Community discussions

MUM Europe 2020
 
kenny55
just joined
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu May 12, 2016 9:28 pm

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu May 12, 2016 9:44 pm

Thanks! works great from Israel, 19 hops 8)
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri May 13, 2016 11:43 pm

One thing I have noticed is that sometimes my virtual ROS x86 bandwidth speedtest server running under VMware ESXi will sometimes crash - interesting.

I can't ping it or talk to it using IP. However the VMware ESXi console to the ROS is still active and the ROS does respond to console CLI commands.

I am kinda wondering if the problem is the IP stack dying when under extreme heavy I/O loads.

It's a good thing this not also functioning at a production router under the same loads.

Anyways - a reboot appears to get thing up and running again for another week or so.

FYI - From my Cacti bandwidth graphs, it looks like my ROS bandwidth test server gets a bandwidth test around every 1 to 2 hours ever day.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
kristaps
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 1:37 pm

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue May 17, 2016 12:38 pm

could you make watchdog that genarates supout before it crashes and send to support@mikrotik.com
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue May 17, 2016 11:30 pm

could you make watchdog that genarates supout before it crashes and send to support@mikrotik.com
OK - I modified my auto-reboot - when I get a hit I will send an email to support
North Idaho Tom Jones
-- Thank you --

Netwatch: (Detect a missed ping to something)
Host: 192.0.2.254 (an IP in my network)
Down: log info "Netwatch missed a ping to 192.0.2.254 - starting 5 minute timeout script" ; /system script run NetWatchBoot-192.0.2.254

Scripts: (Verify not false alarm - verify the problem stays around and we lost connectivity)
NetWatchBoot-192.0.2.254
:local addresstoping 192.0.2.254;
:local interface "wlan1";
#
:local continue true;
:local counter 0;
:local maxcounter 18;
:local sleepseconds 10;
:local goodpings 0;
:log error "-----> Tom's Netwatch-Script-Warning - Netwatch could not ping $addresstoping - Will begin further testing in $sleepseconds seconds - and will continue for $maxcounter times $sleepseconds seconds";
:while ($continue) do={
:set counter ($counter + 1);
:delay $sleepseconds;
:if ([/ping $addresstoping interval=1 count=1] =0) do={
:log info "----->ping to $addresstoping failed on attempt $counter of $maxcounter -- Will try again in $sleepseconds seconds";
} else {
:log warning "-----> ping success on to $addresstoping attempt $counter of $maxcounter <----- No Further testing needed --- Program will exit -----";
:set continue false;
:set goodpings ($goodpings +1);
};
}
:if ($counter=$maxcounter) do={:set continue false;}
}
:if ($"goodpings" = 0 ) do={
:log info "-----> Rebooting in 15 seconds";
:delay 5;
/file print file=ScriptRebootReason
/file set ScriptRebootReason.txt contents="Rebooted by Toms script on $[/system clock get date] at $[/system clock get time]"
:log error "-----> Rebooting in 10 seconds";
:delay 5;
:log error "-----> Rebooting in 5 seconds";
:delay 5;
:log error "-----> Rebooting now";
:delay 1;
/system sup-output without-paging file=btest-server
:delay 20;
/system reboot
/system reboot
/system reboot
/system reboot
}
 
voodoovood
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed May 18, 2016 1:21 am

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed May 18, 2016 1:23 am

perfect!
27 hops from Slovakia,
930mbit up/ 930 mbit down
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed May 18, 2016 6:08 pm

perfect!
27 hops from Slovakia,
930mbit up/ 930 mbit down
Perfect :)
Now that is what I like to hear :)

Am I correct in guessing you have a 1-gig Internet connection ?
 
WirelessRudy
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 3089
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:54 pm
Location: Spain

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed May 18, 2016 6:48 pm

I tried your server from Spain now several times and best I ever got download was some 100Mbps.
This is done directly from a CCR as our gateway router.
We are on a 300/300 symmetric line and with other programs can easy push over 250Mbps.

Doing same Mikrotik speedtest with its Window bandwidth tester from my PC gives me less than 1Mb, where a download progam with multiple connection almost inmediately downloads at 120-130 mbps and sometimes up to 280Mbps into my PC. (Still traffic from the rest of my WISP environment using the same 300/300Mbps.)

How come these huge differences?
Show your appreciation of this post by giving me Karma! Thanks.

Rudy R. Puister

WISP operator based on MT routerboard & ROS.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed May 18, 2016 7:01 pm

I tried your server from Spain now several times and best I ever got download was some 100Mbps.
This is done directly from a CCR as our gateway router.
We are on a 300/300 symmetric line and with other programs can easy push over 250Mbps.

Doing same Mikrotik speedtest with its Window bandwidth tester from my PC gives me less than 1Mb, where a download progam with multiple connection almost inmediately downloads at 120-130 mbps and sometimes up to 280Mbps into my PC. (Still traffic from the rest of my WISP environment using the same 300/300Mbps.)

How come these huge differences?
I am guessing at some answers...
- Your up-stream ISP - or their up-stream connection may be over subscribed.
- There could be some bottle-necks somewhere between your location and my location (my connection is physically a 10-gig connection from North Idaho USA into Seattle USA. My account is actually a 2-gig account that is burstable.
- Try running the btest several times at different times. There is a chance that somebody else may of also been performing a btest to my server at the same time you ran a btest to my server - which may result in a slower result.
- Are you testing using TCP or UDP. UDP is normally much faster over many hops.

What is the best speedtest you get when using a PC computer testing to speedtest.net ? What do you get when testing to Seattle USA ?

Can you post traceroute from your location to 207.32.195.2
If you give me your IP address, I will post a traceroute from me to you.
 
WirelessRudy
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 3089
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:54 pm
Location: Spain

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed May 18, 2016 8:55 pm

I tried your server from Spain now several times and best I ever got download was some 100Mbps.
This is done directly from a CCR as our gateway router.
We are on a 300/300 symmetric line and with other programs can easy push over 250Mbps.

Doing same Mikrotik speedtest with its Window bandwidth tester from my PC gives me less than 1Mb, where a download progam with multiple connection almost inmediately downloads at 120-130 mbps and sometimes up to 280Mbps into my PC. (Still traffic from the rest of my WISP environment using the same 300/300Mbps.)

How come these huge differences?
I am guessing at some answers...
- Your up-stream ISP - or their up-stream connection may be over subscribed.
- There could be some bottle-necks somewhere between your location and my location (my connection is physically a 10-gig connection from North Idaho USA into Seattle USA. My account is actually a 2-gig account that is burstable.
- Try running the btest several times at different times. There is a chance that somebody else may of also been performing a btest to my server at the same time you ran a btest to my server - which may result in a slower result.
- Are you testing using TCP or UDP. UDP is normally much faster over many hops.

What is the best speedtest you get when using a PC computer testing to speedtest.net ? What do you get when testing to Seattle USA ?



Can you post traceroute from your location to 207.32.195.2
If you give me your IP address, I will post a traceroute from me to you.
Ok, Traceroute;
Traceroute to 207.32.195.2 by pingplotter.JPG
172.25.48.1 is my gateway, 212.231.164.1 is the cisco of my 300/300M provider.

udp speedtest from you to my CCR; Impossible
udp speedtest to you from CCR;
udp speedtest to 207.32.195.2.JPG
Good speed, 328Mb upload! (To where? Provider might drop these. Do they reach you, don't think so....)

tcp speedtest from you to my CCR;
tcp speedtest from 207.32.195.2.JPG
tcp speedtest to you from my CCR;
tcp speedtest from 207.32.195.2.JPG
udp upload from my PC to you;
tcp speedtest from 207.32.195.2.JPG
udp download from you to my PC; impossible
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Show your appreciation of this post by giving me Karma! Thanks.

Rudy R. Puister

WISP operator based on MT routerboard & ROS.
 
WirelessRudy
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 3089
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:54 pm
Location: Spain

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed May 18, 2016 9:05 pm

Peplink multi stream download from some servers;
peplink multi tcp download test from some servers.JPG
http://www.speedtest.net;
http://www.speedtest to and from local provider's server.JPG
Both up as download on the main pipe reached 185mbps (roughly 100-140mbps client running)

I tried to do some http://www.speedtest's to some servers in Seatle, WA. but speeds where in the range of 2-6Mbps at best. Not very useful.....
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Show your appreciation of this post by giving me Karma! Thanks.

Rudy R. Puister

WISP operator based on MT routerboard & ROS.
 
WirelessRudy
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 3089
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:54 pm
Location: Spain

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed May 18, 2016 9:08 pm

So, maybe we have a provider that is having saturation issues or we are not having a 100% contented to us pipe.

But how to proof? We've had something similar in the past and than the provider comes up with some ftp servers we can download from with ftp and off course, always we reach top speed according contract....

And maybe indeed the route to his servers is OK. How to find where other bottlenecks are to be found.
If I read the several post from other users from all over the world with good results, I'm wondering why I cannot have my contracted speeds?
Any help/suggestions from this forum is appreciated.
Show your appreciation of this post by giving me Karma! Thanks.

Rudy R. Puister

WISP operator based on MT routerboard & ROS.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed May 18, 2016 9:22 pm

Here is a Mikrotik traceroute from my btest server to your ISP router:
traceroute-212-231-164-1.png
I suspect your ISP may have two potential issues:
- their NAT router might be running slow
- some of the hops appear to be bottlenecked ( he.net )
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
chiefbmr
newbie
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 6:22 pm
Location: USA

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue May 31, 2016 11:09 pm

Thanks Tom, tested 500/500 perfectly.
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8319
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Jun 01, 2016 2:22 am

With 186ms RTT, I'm getting 1912.4 Mbps/1933.6 Mbps Tx/Rx, not more. looks like there's somewhere 2G link in-between Belarus and USA :D
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Jun 01, 2016 6:01 pm

FYI - The free public btest server available to all Mikrotik admins is averaging just over 1.5 TB (tera-bytes) of best data a month. Wow - It looks like it gets used/tested against up to 50 times a day. And at least one person ran a 6-hour 200-meg sustained test during the last month.

I would like to ask - if anybody has the extra bandwidth capacity - would you be interested in a 24 hour sustained 1.5 gig up & down test ? I am interested in an opportunity to stress test my un-used spare capacity under heavy load.

Edit: or a bunch of testers running a 24 hour btest against me at what ever they can spare ... I would then set my simple queue to limit at 1.5 gig up & down flat.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Jun 02, 2016 12:17 am

OK - I just setup a 2'nd speedtest server.
This one is at: http://speedtest.rezmail.net

It is hosted on the same VMware ESXi server as my Mikrotik btest server.

Hope this helps to compare a btest and a windows speedtest through your mikrotiks & firewalls.

If ya don't mind - you are welcome to post your btest speeds and your speedtest speeds.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Jun 07, 2016 1:42 am

Heads up - I will be shutting down both speedtest servers in about 30-minutes from now.
They should be turned on in about 15 hours or so.

Our 10-gig fiber is being worked on - My network is going to fall back to a microwave link. To conserve bandwidth, I will temporarily shut down both speedtest servers - then bring them back on-line when the new fiber is connected.

I thought I would post this - because the btest server has many people testing it at all times of the day.
So, when it goes down, it is not you...


North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Jun 16, 2016 1:02 am

could you make watchdog that genarates supout before it crashes and send to support@mikrotik.com
Kristaps,
I am able to duplicate and repeat the lockup with my ROS x86 PUBLIC btest server (hosted on a MvWare ESXi server).
I will shortly be sending an email to support@mikrotik.com
I will describe in the email how to duplicate the lockup.
What happens when the ROS locks up is the following:
 - No IP network access
 - Console & keyboard to ROS CLI is still active
 - Can not ping anything (including WAN IP address and also the 127.0.0.1 loopback IP address)
North Idaho Tom Jones
 
StefanM
newbie
Posts: 49
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2015 1:49 am

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Jun 16, 2016 2:22 am

Thanks for this.
MTCNA
MTCRE
 
sph1nx
just joined
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2016 8:26 am

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Sat Jun 18, 2016 8:30 am

Thank you for the endeavor and for sharing this with the community. As a home user I must say I'm pretty happy about my speedtest results:
 status: done testing
              duration: 31s
            rx-current: 305.7Mbps
  rx-10-second-average: 306.0Mbps
      rx-total-average: 197.7Mbps
          lost-packets: 2740
           random-data: no
             direction: receive
              
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Mon Jun 20, 2016 9:30 pm

Heads up
Starting this morning (Monday 6/20/2016 PST),
I am now running the Mikrotik CHR 64-Bit version or ROS.
The original x86 ROS 32-bit btest server is turned off, while we test the 64-bit CHR ROS.
The new ROS is the following:
     - Running under VMware ESXi (the same server that was hosting the 32-bit  ROS btest server)
     - VMXNET3 Ethernet (paravirtulized Ethernet driver in the Mikrotik ROS) for ether1 (old 32-bit was E1000E)
     - 2 CPUs with 8-Gig ram (Old 32-bit ROS was 1 CPU with 2-Gig ram)
     - Latest ROS version (6.35.4)

If you experience anything other than normal speeds - please let me know.
ALSO - for the Mikrotik admins with a 1-gig or faster connection, please test and let me know if you are able to send & receive at the speeds you were getting in the past.
Mikrotik Bandwidth test server:     207.32.195.2
bandwidth test username:     btest
bandwidth test password:     btest

FYI:  Below is the simple queue I was using on the older x86 32-bit ROS best server.  I kept the same setting for the new CHR btest server.
#

/queue simple
add burst-limit=2200M/3500M burst-threshold=250M/250M burst-time=6m40s/10m max-limit=250M/250M name=3.5-Gig-send-and-2.2-Gig-receive target=""
 
kristaps
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 1:37 pm

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Jun 21, 2016 12:40 am

Looks like clients having RX problems both udp and tcp, Not been able to do more then couple hundred kb to your server form different locations. 
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Jun 21, 2016 12:56 am

Hmm,

I turned off the CCR 64-bit ROS btest server (a few minutes ago)
I turned on the ROS 32-bit ROS btest server
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Jun 21, 2016 1:31 am

Hmm,

I turned off the CCR 64-bit ROS btest server (a few minutes ago)
I turned on the ROS 32-bit ROS btest server
I guess I am going to need to look at what kind of bandwidth the 60 day trial license can support for throughput.
In-house I was able to send to it (from another ROS 32-bit) at near 10 gig.  However - I did not measure how fast the ccr can send.  Is the send speed limited (when running the built-in 60 eval license -or- do I need to do something (license) to kick up the vmxnet3 Ethernet send speed ?
North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Jul 12, 2016 5:56 pm

Almost cool.
This morning I had somebody doing a btest to my public Mikrotik ROS 32-Bit virtual hosted server at an average of 3-Gig for about one hour - and I did not even notice a difference on my network.
 
User avatar
stewartpe
just joined
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 7:49 pm

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Jul 21, 2016 7:41 am

Awesome tool! For the first time, I can test end-to-end.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Jul 21, 2016 8:08 pm

I just updated the public access btest server (207.32.195.2)

It is now version 6.36 (X86 ROS running as a virtual client - which is hosted on my VMware ESXi server_

I welcome the Mikrotik admins to bang away at it to help me determine if it is stable under greater than 1-gig (up to 3-gig) throughput btest loads.
Specifically I want to see if the random lockup condition has now gone/resolved under heavy loads where the simple-queue kicks in.
 
User avatar
Paxy
just joined
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 8:28 pm

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Jul 26, 2016 12:18 pm

Hmm, for some reason I could not connect to 207.32.195.2 using BW test in MT with TCP (user btest/btest) from Serbia.
Is it just some temp issue, or is this project done with testing ?

Great job anyway !
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Jul 26, 2016 6:05 pm

Hmm, for some reason I could not connect to 207.32.195.2 using BW test in MT with TCP (user btest/btest) from Serbia.
Is it just some temp issue, or is this project done with testing ?

Great job anyway !
Sorry about the can't connect.
The problem is the x86 ROS keeps locking up.
From what I think I am seeing, it appears that if somebody continues a btest bandwidth test - and my simple queue kicks in to limit them to 250 meg - and the test continues, then sometimes the TCP/IP stack on my ROS x86 takes a dump and no longer talks.  The console is still responsive but nothing IP talks.  When my ROS does this, it can not even ping the loopback address 127.0.0.1 - it acts like all IP traffic is just turned off.  From the console, I still have CLI commands to the ROS.  To get my btest ROS server back on-line, I have to reboot the MIkrotik ROS.
North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Jul 26, 2016 6:20 pm

For virtualized environment you should try CHR image.
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8319
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Jul 26, 2016 6:25 pm

also, Watchdog should help in that case
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Jul 26, 2016 6:38 pm

also, Watchdog should help in that case
I do use Watchdog
I also have my own custom watchdog.
I do not know whey they are not working when the x86 ROS IP stack dies ???  Something I will need to study when I have the free time.
A note - Even if the watchdog was working - A watchdog is not a fix for the underlying problem - at best a watchdog would be network effecting reboot.
One issue with the Mikrotik watchdog is --- when the simple queue kicks in and starts dropping packets in a RED (Random Early Detect) condition, the simple queue can and will also drop watchdog packets - which will result in un-needed reboots.
My watchdog (netwatch with a script) should be working but for some reason it is not.  My watchdog (netwatch-script-reboot) script will retry many times then perform a reboot after continued/extended ping failures - where the stock Mikrotik watchdog will reboot upon a single ping failure.
Thus with only the Mikrotik stock watchdog - the ROS is subject to rebooting during a btest - thus the reason I do not use it.
North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Jul 26, 2016 11:30 pm

For virtualized environment you should try CHR image.
I thought I replied to this this morning - but I must of forgot to hit the post button.
The reason I use X86 ROS for the btest server is because I received a free complimentary license from Mikrotik and I used it to activate the X86 ROS 32-bit btest server.

FYI - I did try the free version of CHR but I hit some snags :
- The CHR free license does not support high-throughput on the EthernetThe free license has a limitation of only a few meg throughput on the Ethernet which prevents somebody from performing a btest in the hundreds or gigs of bandwidth to support a remote admin running a btest at 1-gig or even multi-gig throughput best.
North Idaho Tom Jones
 
jarda
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 7604
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:46 pm

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Jul 26, 2016 11:44 pm

You can activate 2months unlimited trial license for free. After that period you loose only the update ability. If you need to update you can freely regenerate the system Id and activate new trial license again.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Jul 27, 2016 1:01 am

Sorry about that - the btest server went down again.
I just rebooted it so it should be up again.

Sometime within a week or so - I may give CHR another trial run.
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8319
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Jul 28, 2016 12:06 am

One issue with the Mikrotik watchdog is --- when the simple queue kicks in and starts dropping packets in a RED (Random Early Detect) condition, the simple queue can and will also drop watchdog packets - which will result in un-needed reboots.
but if 127.0.0.1 is not pingable after crash, you may use it - it should not be affected by queues :)
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Jul 28, 2016 12:23 am

One issue with the Mikrotik watchdog is --- when the simple queue kicks in and starts dropping packets in a RED (Random Early Detect) condition, the simple queue can and will also drop watchdog packets - which will result in un-needed reboots.
but if 127.0.0.1 is not pingable after crash, you may use it - it should not be affected by queues :)
When the X86 ROS server dies, I have the following conditions then:
 - Console is still responsive
- noting talks IP
- I can not ping 127.0.0.1
- The console CLI appears to look normal - but no IP to anything
- A console CLI reboot does work ( after a reboot - the btest server is on-line and working again )
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8319
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:56 am

That's why I say: set Watchdog Address to 127.0.0.1 :)
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Jul 28, 2016 3:04 am

That's why I say: set Watchdog Address to 127.0.0.1 :)
Mikrotik watchdog now set to 127.0.0.1
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Jul 29, 2016 3:56 am

Another lockup
- the Mikrotik watchdog to 127.0.0.1 did NOT reboot the X86 ROS router
- A console CLI system-reboot did properly reboot it.  After the reboot, it was back online.

Prior to me doing the CLI reboot, I verified the ROS could not ping anything (itself 207.32.195.2 & gateway 207.32.195.1 & 127.0.0.1 loopback)
The only thing in the IP-arp print list (arp table) was the 207.32.195.2 mikrotik itself.

This bring up a question as to why it did not watchdog auto-reboot -
My question is - does the watchdog use a special call or function via an IP stack to the 127.0.0.1 to make a watchdog reboot command to itself ?

The reason I ask is that I have seen some devices with CLI commands which the command is actually talking to itself on 127.0.0.1 to do some things passed to it from the CLI or programs or other ...

--- Some other background information ---
my VMware ESXi server hosting this X86 ROS has several other router/nat virtual hosted servers on it also (Pf Sense).  The other devices all have 10-gig links (vmxnet3) never have a problem.
 
jarda
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 7604
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:46 pm

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Jul 29, 2016 8:22 am

It would be good you could make a supout before reboot and just after the reboot and send them to mikrotik. They are sometimes able to find the reason and correct it.
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Jul 29, 2016 11:49 am

Watchdog on x86 is currently broken.
 
spaxton
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 175
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 12:18 pm

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Jul 29, 2016 2:04 pm

My VM MikroTik server should have 1/1 Gbps but according to this measuring it is not like that... Unless there are too many people testing at the moment.

Here are my test results:

Both directions UDP
Unnamed QQ Screenshot20160729125249.jpg
Only Upload
Unnamed QQ Screenshot20160729125325.jpg
And only Download
Unnamed QQ Screenshot20160729125416.jpg
Thank You for providing us this. It is very useful.

Best Regards!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Jul 29, 2016 6:11 pm

Heads up
Potential slower-than-normal bandwidth btest results to my 207.32.195.2 ROS btest server - every last weekend of the month.

The reason for possible slower than normal results:
My company "Red-Spectrum Communications" now has an all-customer wide-open no-bandwidth-limitations every last-weekend of the month.

Every Friday (normally towards the end of the day) prior to the last weekend of the month -and- Saturday -and- Sunday -and- Monday morning, we remove all speed-limits to all of our customers (thousands of customers).  All of our fiber-to-the-home customers become 500 meg up/down accounts -and- all of our Microwave customer have no limits.
We do this for the following reasons:
-1) We have the bandwidth to support this
-2) Customers experience much faster connections than normal.  It helps to encourage our customers to upgrade their paid-for bandwidths they are purchasing from us.
-3) It gives us an opportunity to load-stress-test our network and look for areas in our network which could use improvements

Although we only have a 10-gig connection Internet feed - we have discovered the total average customer bandwidth only jumps up an additional 150 percent during the last weekend of the month.

Anyways - when we do this every last weekend of every month, it has the potential to effect your test results to our  207.32.195.2 btest server.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
spaxton
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 175
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 12:18 pm

Re: RE: Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Jul 29, 2016 7:03 pm

Heads up
Potential slower-than-normal bandwidth btest results to my 207.32.195.2 ROS btest server - every last weekend of the month.

The reason for possible slower than normal results:
My company "Red-Spectrum Communications" now has an all-customer wide-open no-bandwidth-limitations every last-weekend of the month.

Every Friday (normally towards the end of the day) prior to the last weekend of the month -and- Saturday -and- Sunday -and- Monday morning, we remove all speed-limits to all of our customers (thousands of customers).  All of our fiber-to-the-home customers become 500 meg up/down accounts -and- all of our Microwave customer have no limits.
We do this for the following reasons:
-1) We have the bandwidth to support this
-2) Customers experience much faster connections than normal.  It helps to encourage our customers to upgrade their paid-for bandwidths they are purchasing from us.
-3) It gives us an opportunity to load-stress-test our network and look for areas in our network which could use improvements

Although we only have a 10-gig connection Internet feed - we have discovered the total average customer bandwidth only jumps up an additional 150 percent during the last weekend of the month.

Anyways - when we do this every last weekend of every month, it has the potential to effect your test results to our  207.32.195.2 btest server.

North Idaho Tom Jones
Thanks for the info. I will test again tomorrow.

Best Regards. ;)

Sent from my Redmi Note 2 using Tapatalk
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Jul 29, 2016 7:32 pm

spaxton - questions for you

- Are you testing using a virtual ROS ?
If so ...
- What hardware and operating system & version are you using ?
- What kind on network cards are you using on your virtual ROS ?
- Are you using X86 ROS or the cloud 64-bit version ?
- What do you get when you test to your local loopback address 172.0.0.1 for a btest ?

( me - I use E1000E network card on my virtual ROS.  I get about 17 gig on a btest to 127.0.0.1.  - Also I get about 9.5 gig between two different ROS systems (each hosted on two different physical servers).

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
spaxton
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 175
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 12:18 pm

Re: RE: Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Jul 29, 2016 8:23 pm

spaxton - questions for you

- Are you testing using a virtual ROS ?
If so ...
- What hardware and operating system & version are you using ?
- What kind on network cards are you using on your virtual ROS ?
- Are you using X86 ROS or the cloud 64-bit version ?
- What do you get when you test to your local loopback address 172.0.0.1 for a btest ?

( me - I use E1000E network card on my virtual ROS.  I get about 17 gig on a btest to 127.0.0.1.  - Also I get about 9.5 gig between two different ROS systems (each hosted on two different physical servers).

North Idaho Tom Jones
Hi friend,

I am using x86 64 bit on a virtual machine on proxmox. The machine is supermicro with intel atom processor while the network card is intel E1000E. I could also choose RTL. Testing to 127.0.0.1 resulted with 1800 Mbps. Just tested it with TCP and it shows about 5 Gbps.

That's how my configuration looks like in few words. :)

Best Regards.

Sent from my Redmi Note 2 using Tapatalk
 
l781
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 6:45 pm
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:13 am

thanks a lot for usefull tool!

my result is 400M/400M over 25 hops (Lithuania).
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Aug 10, 2016 7:19 pm

Good news
I now have a 2nd best server
This 2nd btest server is intended for low-speed long-term btest connections
(( This new 2nd btest server is not intended to test bandwidth throughput ))
(( This new 2nd btest server is intended to test long-term connectivity ))

Here are the details:
IP address: 207.32.195.10
User: btest
Passowrd: btest
Local Tx Speed: 25k
Remote Tx Speed: 25k


Duration of your long-term test to this server are not to exceed 7 days

Please set your Tx Speeds to 25k ! If you do not set your Tx Speeds to 25k, then you will create problems for other simultaneous users of this server testing at the same time.

Like any new server - there may be a few kinks to fine-tune and work out.
 
ffathoni
just joined
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2016 7:36 am

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Aug 16, 2016 7:40 am

hi tom, wonderful job for providing this test server.
however I can't connect to your 207.32.195.2, is it down again?

thanks
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Aug 16, 2016 5:45 pm

hi tom, wonderful job for providing this test server.
however I can't connect to your 207.32.195.2, is it down again?

thanks
Yup - it was down again.
I did a system - reboot. It should be up again

The last thing I spotted in the logs was: ... 91.39.152.5 via dude
The way I look at it is that no matter what 91.39.152.5 was doing, it should not of caused a crash (if there was anything related between dude and the crash).
Question for admin of 91.39.152.5 - cat you bang away again at my 207.32.195.2 - I would like to test to see if there is something that will repeat the crash

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:19 pm

Question for others who use x86 ROS

Am I the only person experiencing x86 ROS problems ?
or
Am I the only person pushing an x86 ROS beyond 1 gig throughput with a 10-gig network interface in a virtual environment ?

On a related note...
I have many times tried x86 ROS in a 10-gig multi-Ethernet environment under sustained loads from 500 meg to 8 gig. I have never been able to trust an x86 ROS because they often just lock-up and stop routing. I know my hardware is good and my hypervisor (ESXi) is good because the same VMware boxes also run dozens of PfSense virtual routers/firewalls at the same loads (up to 8 gig sustained).

Sometimes I wonder are the X86 ROS lockup problems are because ROS does not support or have paravirtual drivers (for things like Ethernet & hdd),
i
This btest server 207.32.195.2 has been driving me nuts - since I started it this year - it has locked up well over 100 times !!!!!!!! I have replaced all hardware and rebuilt everything at least a dozen times.
If I had to give ROS (x86) a score for reliability under load , I am sorry to say it would be low (close to zero).
If I had to give PfSense a score for reliability under load, I would give it a score close to 100.
I uave used both for many years. I really like and totally trust Mikrotik wireless products and Mikrotik hardware. I just can't say the same about their x86 ROS products - not good.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
jarda
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 7604
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:46 pm

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Aug 18, 2016 10:57 am

Have you tried chr instead x86? Not sure, maybe could be better in your situation..
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Aug 18, 2016 4:12 pm

Have you tried chr instead x86? Not sure, maybe could be better in your situation..
Yes and no

I have tried it. I do not have a CHR license key. The free version has built-in speed limitations. Without looking it up again I think it was something like 1-meg (or somewhere slowwww and un-useable).

So - yes - I could run CHR with the free license, but btest will top out at the whimpy speeds of about 1-meg tops (or what ever the CHR free license sets the maximum throughput at).

A note - Right now - I do have many remote admins performing regular btest tests several times a day at speeds greater than 1-gig. So, that tells me that those testing at speeds greater than 1-gig are probably on 10-gig hardware and probably on 10-gig Internet connections (like me).

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
jarda
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 7604
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:46 pm

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:20 pm

You can get unlimited trial chr license for free. It will just block updates after two months.... For testing it is great.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Aug 23, 2016 7:37 pm

As of 8/23/2016 9:15 AM PST the btest server is now running on CHR
(CHR, 64-bit, VMXNET-3, 4-Gig ram memory, 128 MB hard disk, 2-CPUs)
I am running VMware ESXi version 6.0.0 to host the Mikrotik ROS CHR btest server

License; not-configured (it will eventually time-out for updates)

btests to itself:
When performing a btest to 127.0.0.1 UDP, it hits 17.5 Gbps (without simple-queue enabled)
When performing a btest to 207.32.195.2 UDP, it hits 17.5 Gbps (without simple-queue enabled)

For Mikrotik admin public best testing, I currently have simple queues enabled:
/queue simple
add burst-limit=2200M/3500M burst-threshold=250M/250M burst-time=6m40s/10m max-limit=250M/250M name=3.5-Gig-send--and--2.2-Gig-receive target=""

To test to it, the same info applies:
IP address 207.32.195.2
user: btest
passowrs: btest

Everybody is welcome to bang away at it. I think we would all like to find out how stable it is under gig+ btest loads
Please post your positive or negative results - thank you

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
format19
just joined
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 12:55 pm
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Aug 24, 2016 4:15 pm

Using 207.32.195.2
I cant seem to get more than 300-800Kbps on TCP Download?

Are others having an issue like this ?
Thanks
 
novelty22
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 1:57 pm

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Aug 24, 2016 4:52 pm

Using 207.32.195.2
I cant seem to get more than 300-800Kbps on TCP Download?

Are others having an issue like this ?
Thanks
That's about what I'm getting as well
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Aug 24, 2016 8:39 pm

TCP verses UDP

UDP is a fire a packet and forget protocol. With UDP you can send many packets. Over long distance links UDP should somewhat retain pretty fast speeds.

TCP is a fire a packet and wait for an ACK from the remote side protocol. With TCP, you have to wait for the remote ACK to be received prior to sending the next packet. As distance and hops and network routers increase, TCP will slow down.

Additional information:
TCP uses RED (Random Early Detect) which helps govern speeds. When there is no ACK received in a short time, the sending unit starts to learn how fast it can send before there are packet drops.
UDP does not use RED. Some protocols using UDP might send many many packets and receive a summary of received packets.

UDP is: fire - fire - fire -fire - fire - fire - fire
TCP is: fire - wait for ACK - fire - wait for ACK - fire - wait for ACK - fire - wait for ACK - fire - wait for ack - fire - wait for ACK - fire - wait for ACK
(Just looking at the two above lines I typed in - I hope you can get an idea why UDP is sometimes a better protocol and why TCP is sometimes a better protocol.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
biland
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:01 pm
Location: tuxtepec, mexico
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:03 am

i love this Tool
but today i also get only 700 to Max 900 Kbps on tcp receive,, down here in Mexico..
upload is working fine
 
gwitowski
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 3:58 pm

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Aug 25, 2016 7:01 pm

Hello. I'm from Poland. Your server is doing a great job, but for a few days, my score is 800 - 900 Kbps. If you can then do something with it. Thank you.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Aug 25, 2016 11:23 pm

Hello. I'm from Poland. Your server is doing a great job, but for a few days, my score is 800 - 900 Kbps. If you can then do something with it. Thank you.
re for a few days ...
Are you stating something like -- for a few days it is now slower results - or faster results

A few days ago - I changed the 207.32.195.2 btest server
It was a x86 ROS 32-bit server
It is now a CCR ROS 64-bit server

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
gwitowski
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 3:58 pm

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Aug 26, 2016 9:05 am

Hello. I'm from Poland. Your server is doing a great job, but for a few days, my score is 800 - 900 Kbps. If you can then do something with it. Thank you.
re for a few days ...
Are you stating something like -- for a few days it is now slower results - or faster results

A few days ago - I changed the 207.32.195.2 btest server
It was a x86 ROS 32-bit server
It is now a CCR ROS 64-bit server

North Idaho Tom Jones

Hello. Previously, it was OK. I have a link 200Mbps / 200Mbps, and my results are only 800 - 900 Kbps if I test download from your server to me. Upload to your server is OK.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Aug 26, 2016 6:13 pm

Hello. I'm from Poland. Your server is doing a great job, but for a few days, my score is 800 - 900 Kbps. If you can then do something with it. Thank you.
re for a few days ...
Are you stating something like -- for a few days it is now slower results - or faster results

A few days ago - I changed the 207.32.195.2 btest server
It was a x86 ROS 32-bit server
It is now a CCR ROS 64-bit server

North Idaho Tom Jones

Hello. Previously, it was OK. I have a link 200Mbps / 200Mbps, and my results are only 800 - 900 Kbps if I test download from your server to me. Upload to your server is OK.
OK - I see the problem/issue also.
The new CHR ROS 64-bit server is the problem.
This morning (Friday 8 AM PST), I went back to the x86 ROS 32-bit system.
Now I am seeing great btest speeds again (faster than 7 Gig) btest results.
Please test and verify you are now testing at full speeds.

I am just not sure how I feel about the CHR ROS 64-bit system. Without a full paid-for license, it is not useable for close to 1-meg throughput or greater.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
gwitowski
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 3:58 pm

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:28 am

Hello. I'm from Poland. Your server is doing a great job, but for a few days, my score is 800 - 900 Kbps. If you can then do something with it. Thank you.
re for a few days ...
Are you stating something like -- for a few days it is now slower results - or faster results

A few days ago - I changed the 207.32.195.2 btest server
It was a x86 ROS 32-bit server
It is now a CCR ROS 64-bit server

North Idaho Tom Jones

Hello. Previously, it was OK. I have a link 200Mbps / 200Mbps, and my results are only 800 - 900 Kbps if I test download from your server to me. Upload to your server is OK.
OK - I see the problem/issue also.
The new CHR ROS 64-bit server is the problem.
This morning (Friday 8 AM PST), I went back to the x86 ROS 32-bit system.
Now I am seeing great btest speeds again (faster than 7 Gig) btest results.
Please test and verify you are now testing at full speeds.

I am just not sure how I feel about the CHR ROS 64-bit system. Without a full paid-for license, it is not useable for close to 1-meg throughput or greater.

North Idaho Tom Jones

Today is Ok. Thank you for solving the problem. Your server is doing a really good job.
 
jrpaz
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 83
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 5:54 am

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:22 pm

Doing good work sir!
 
jarda
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 7604
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:46 pm

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Sun Aug 28, 2016 9:31 am

Sorry you had not so good experience with chr. I am running dude in testing mode so far on chr with trial unlimited free license and I don't see any interface performance problems.
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Mon Aug 29, 2016 1:51 pm

Only free license is limited to 1Mbps, you can run 60-day trial to get this limitation off.
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:CHR#Free_licenses
 
dsliesrn
just joined
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:36 pm

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Sep 20, 2016 2:19 pm

Hi, I can not connect to the server. It is down?


Thanks
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Sep 20, 2016 5:55 pm

Hi, I can not connect to the server. It is down?


Thanks
YES - It was down again
I rebooted it this morning.
FYI - I am still currently running the 32-BIT ROS x86 version.
Sometime, I plan to try again to test out the 64-bit version - when I have time.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
tljatrezmaildotcom
just joined
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2016 8:33 pm

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Sep 20, 2016 8:36 pm

I use this test server all the time - it works great
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Sep 21, 2016 6:45 am

10-gig fiber network outage & spanning-tree fall back to a low-speed microwave up-link.
So - I had to turn off the 207.32.195.2 btest server to help conserve bandwidth for my customers.
Sorry about that - It should be backup around 8 am California time (my time zone here in North Idaho).

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
paams
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 216
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 6:26 pm

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Sep 27, 2016 1:43 pm

Great Tool and Great Service. I really appreciate. Keep it up :)
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:34 pm

Every morning - first thing, I check my Cacti bandwidth graphs for my entire network to see who is pulling what amount of abnormal bandwidth traffic.
It is sometimes WTF when you discover a huge spike on your Internet traffic by several gig-per-second then realize it was only the 207.32.195.2 btest server - lol

Which brings up a question I have to those who often use it.
My question is, for those with fast Internet accounts (high bandwidth), are your throughput btest results to 207.32.195.2 consistent ?

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:03 pm

Yesterday - I upgraded the 207.32.195.2 public access btest server. I tested it after the upgrade - everything looked good.

However ... I forgot to re-enable the simple-queue to limit the bandwidth test so that it can't consume my entire 10-gig internet feed...
Well ... Yesterday - somebody got a lengthy 6 gig+ btest -and- somebody else got a 4 gig+ btest - lol

My bad - lol.
I will try to not forget about the simple queue - because I do not want to saturate my 10-gig Internet feed or somebody else with a 10-gig feed testing to me and relying on my simple queue to not kill their feed also.

Related info - I have seen it hit up to 9.8 gig on a btest to somebody remote out on the Internet testing to me a few months ago...
And - if any of you ever want to perform a quick btest higher than 4-gig, let me know and I can setup something temporary just for you.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
040mvz
just joined
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:31 am

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:57 pm

Peaking the max of my 500/500MBIT FTTH with ISP KPN in The Netherlands!

Thanks a lot! this helped me great!

Image
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Sep 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Peaking the max of my 500/500MBIT FTTH with ISP KPN in The Netherlands!

Thanks a lot! this helped me great!

Image
You are most welcome.
That is exactly the reason I have this 207.32.195.2 btest server running. So that we can all test and verify our contracted Internet speeds - and take possible actions to correct an environment where we/you do not get what we are paying for.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
PeterO
just joined
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:39 am

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Oct 05, 2016 12:47 pm

Works also perfectly from the Netherlands.
Got my full 200 Mb Down and 20 Mb Up!
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Oct 05, 2016 6:29 pm

Works also perfectly from the Netherlands.
Got my full 200 Mb Down and 20 Mb Up!
Thank you
Posting your test results also help me know my network is talking correctly to the Internet also.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Oct 05, 2016 7:12 pm

FYI - This is a Cacti bandwidth graph of the last 24-hours of my 207.32.195.2 btest server.
The needle like spikes indicate a 5-minute average of the bandwidth (up/down).
Thus a 3 Gig btest executed for only a few seconds may only show a very small spike in the graphs.
The far right of the graph indicates a 180 meg btest. This could of been a 180 meg btest for 5 minutes - or a 360 meg btest for 2.5 minutes or 900 meg btest for 1 minute or a 1.8 gig btest for 30 seconds or a 2.7 gig btest for 20 seconds.

As you can see, the total traffic for 24 hours is actually pretty low (which averages out to a 24-hour total load of about 45 meg sustained over 24-hours), but the real-time-traffic-spikes can actually be very high - especially when I have the simple-queue disabled.
24-hours-btest-server.png
North Idaho Tom Jones
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8319
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:05 pm

Tom, I heard this server is quite popular among RouterOS admins :)

If you do not mind, I'd like to make this topic sticky on the forum so it stay on top
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Oct 07, 2016 12:31 am

Tom, I heard this server is quite popular among RouterOS admins :)

If you do not mind, I'd like to make this topic sticky on the forum so it stay on top

Hey - you are more than welcome
Everybody is welcome to btest to it.
*** thank goodness for simple-queues :) --- otherwise my network could saturate at 10 gig lol

Also - I am open to the idea of other test servers doing other mikrotik related things (tunnel test - vpn test - or what ever could help out the Mikrotik community )

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.5 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Oct 07, 2016 7:07 pm

Good news everybody :)

I just increased the simple-queue settings for the 207.32.195.2 btest server.

The btest server now supports 3.6 Gig testing speeds.

The new speed settings are supported for both send & receive tests (up & down settings are now identical)

I also increased the time duration for how long a 3.6 Gig test can run before it throttles down to a lower speed.

I also increased the sustainable extended btest server to now support a continuous 1/2 Gig (500 Meg)

NOTE: I have a few points I would like to clearly state:
- Do not abuse this btest server
- Do not use this btest server to create/generate unwanted & undesired saturation issues with your Internet provider
- If and when there are two or more tests occurring at the same time (two or more different remote Internet locations at the same time), the simple-queue will rate-limit the combined tests of everybody. Example - two admins can not test at 3.6 gig at the same time.
- If you run an extended test - you are also preventing others from bursting to 3.6 Gig or also running an extended btest
- You are welcome and encouraged to post your tested speeds and where you are located
- This btest server is solely intended to support the good purposes and good intentions of all Mikrotik admins

To use this btest server, perform a Mikrotik ROS bandwidth test to 207.32.195.2 (test user name is: btest -and- test password is: btest)

North Idaho Tom Jones
Below are some screen snapshots of the simple-queue settings:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Oct 11, 2016 3:46 am

Sorry about that - It locked up again and I had to reboot it.
 
User avatar
CZFan
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1455
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2016 8:25 pm
Location: South Africa, Randburg
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Sun Oct 16, 2016 6:54 pm

Hi Tom,

Seems like an excellent tool for the Miktotik community, thx for providing

I am unable to connect though and not sure I am doing something wrong or if it is down at the moment, I am connecting to 207.32.195.2 with usr/pwd btest?

Kind regards from South Africa
MTCNA, MTCTCE, MTCRE & MTCINE
 
lty1993
just joined
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 11:12 am

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Sun Oct 16, 2016 7:13 pm

Looks like the server down again, and I cannot even ping the server.
Screenshot from 2016-10-16 16-05-23.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
NetHorror
just joined
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 8:12 am

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Oct 19, 2016 12:10 pm

can`t connect :(
MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCTCE, MTCWE
 
silversword
newbie
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 3:36 pm

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Oct 19, 2016 7:50 pm

Thx Tom!

FYI testing from Atlanta, GA on AT&T Gigapower.
btest from mikrotik hardware (CPU throttled)
DSL reports and speedtest.net for comparison (fastpath enabled only way to get high speeds without CPU bottleneck)
Can't connect via UDP, only TCP. Wouldn't be surprised if AT&T is filtering UDP out at their interconnects so their backbone doesn't get flooded with infected devices.
VPN tunnel test anyone? :)
Tested with windows Mikrotik bandwidth test util (v0.1) and was only getting 10-20Mbps, not sure why.

Image
 
jasko
just joined
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:11 pm
Location: Argentina
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:19 pm

Hello Tom,

Thanks you to offer this tool for free.

Here are the results of my test:
[img]
btest.png
[/img]

I would ask you: How to configure a user to just have permission on the banwidth-test tool of the server?

thanks in advantage
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Oct 19, 2016 9:50 pm

jasko - re I would ask you: How to configure a user to just have permission on the banwidth-test tool of the server?

Rather than type the answer to your question, I just made some image snapshots.
Is this what you was asking for ?

North Idaho Tom Jones
btest-user.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Oct 19, 2016 9:54 pm

silversword - re: Can't connect via UDP, only TCP

Interesting ...
Are you behind a firewall ?
Is your test device on a live IP address ?

devices/programs/computers/servers talking on the Internet need both TCP and UDP

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Oct 19, 2016 10:20 pm

Can't hurt asking ...

Anybody want to donate a Mikrotik with a 10-gig port to replace my x86 32-bit 207.32.195.2 btest server ?

I would like to find a hardware solution Mikrotik something that can btest up to near 10-gig (or at least 4-gig).

I would like to see the stability & throughput difference .

anybody - Mikrotik how about you ????

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
silversword
newbie
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 3:36 pm

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Oct 20, 2016 1:13 am

silversword - re: Can't connect via UDP, only TCP

Interesting ...
Are you behind a firewall ?
Is your test device on a live IP address ?
No firewall, live public IP from AT&T Uverse, the Gigapower division.

It's consumer 1Gbit, so I'm sure they have protection mechanisms for large quantities of UDP traffic aiming across the Atlantic ;)

If I had a closer server with btest listening I'd test that...nothing setup atm.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Oct 20, 2016 1:46 am

silverswood

What do you get when you do the same traceroute again but this time using UDP instead of icmp ?

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
silversword
newbie
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 3:36 pm

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Oct 20, 2016 5:59 am

What do you get when you do the same traceroute again but this time using UDP instead of icmp ?
....you can traceroute with UDP. My "learned something new" for the day! Makes sense if you think about it though. :)

Image

Re-testing apparently it's only the receive part I'm not getting...though quite slow, guessing a 1Mbps limit.

Image

Considering you're trying to "receive" a UDP, there must be a tcp control channel for the btest that is telling the btest server to send udp at you, so somewhere it must be dropping it. I'll send you a PM with my IP and btest server if you'd like to test.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Oct 20, 2016 7:06 pm

silverswood

Based on your last traceroute - I just noticed you are coming from an RFC-1918 NAT network (10.x.x.x).
This implies you have a firewall/NAT device between your Mikrotik and the Internet.
The firewall/NAT device may need a port-forward so that Mikrotik UDP packets from the Internet are forwarded to your internal Mikrotik.
This may be starting to sound more complex to configure than the time you may want to invest just to be able to perform a btest to-and-from my 207.32.195.2 btest server.

What might be easier would be to move and reconfigure your Mikrotik to be the live IP address NAT device for your RFC-1918 internal 10.x.x.x network. Then you should be able to perform UDP btests in both directions - and it may give you more control over what your network is doing.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
Jeroen1000
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 195
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 2:05 pm

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Oct 20, 2016 9:07 pm

Just wanted to say thanks for your server. I've been able to test both my connections. One weird Mikrotik thing found: when uploading (10 megabit) the test server process makes a routerbord 450G's CPU spike to 100%. When just doing a speedtest on speedtest.net, it does not go over 10%
 
jarda
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 7604
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:46 pm

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Oct 21, 2016 10:02 am

Because btest is very cpu hungry while generating traffic.
 
silversword
newbie
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 3:36 pm

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Oct 21, 2016 4:16 pm

Based on your last traceroute - I just noticed you are coming from an RFC-1918 NAT network (10.x.x.x).
This implies you have a firewall/NAT device between your Mikrotik and the Internet.
The firewall/NAT device may need a port-forward so that Mikrotik UDP packets from the Internet are forwarded to your internal Mikrotik.
This may be starting to sound more complex to configure than the time you may want to invest just to be able to perform a btest to-and-from my 207.32.195.2 btest server.
No, the 10. is the private side of the Mikrotik. traceroute must default to the default internal private bridge unless specified otherwise.

Running the btest directly from the Mikrotik using winbox.

Image
 
jllz
just joined
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2016 12:59 am

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Oct 21, 2016 11:12 pm

So It looks like my routers running 6.37 and 6.37.1 just shows 0 my routers with older firmware work with it tho.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Sat Oct 22, 2016 2:14 am

Instead of trying BOTH, try send by itself then try receive by itself.
Also you might want to try and verify you can ping 207.32.195.2 (the btest server)

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
jllz
just joined
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2016 12:59 am

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Mon Oct 24, 2016 4:17 pm

So looks like it works with tcp but not udp.
 
gardenstate
just joined
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2013 7:40 pm

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Oct 27, 2016 8:00 pm

Thank you for this service, NI Tom Jones.

(BTW, grew up in the Panhandle up near Murray.)
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Oct 27, 2016 8:45 pm

Thank you for this service, NI Tom Jones.

(BTW, grew up in the Panhandle up near Murray.)
Murray Idaho - Originally started as a mining camp back in the 1880s. Lots of trees, mountains and critters. Small community but a very beautiful place.
I am actually in Plummer Idaho - about 30 minutes or so south of Coeur d'Alene.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
netflow
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 61
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:53 pm

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Sat Oct 29, 2016 6:05 pm

Thanks for the service Tom. It is a great alternative to speedtest. I hope you can keep it running despite its increasing notoriety.

Note to other testers: Windows v0.1 client is not up to the level of the ROS client. It should be avoided for any realistic figures.
 
RonJohn63
newbie
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 10:04 pm

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Nov 02, 2016 11:05 pm

(Had to temporarily disable the FW rule on dropping all WAN packets.)

Otherwise, it matches well with my 150/10 cable tier.
[admin@MikroTik] /tool> /tool bandwidth-test address=207.32.195.2 user=btest password=btest \
 	duration=00:01:00 direction=receive random-data=yes protocol=udp
                status: done testing
              duration: 1m1s
            rx-current: 163.0Mbps
  rx-10-second-average: 163.0Mbps
      rx-total-average: 146.3Mbps
          lost-packets: 1571
           random-data: yes
             direction: receive
               rx-size: 1500
[admin@MikroTik] /tool> /tool bandwidth-test address=207.32.195.2 user=btest password=btest \
	duration=00:01:00 direction=transmit  random-data=yes protocol=udp
                status: done testing
              duration: 1m1s
            tx-current: 10.8Mbps
  tx-10-second-average: 10.8Mbps
      tx-total-average: 11.1Mbps
           random-data: yes
             direction: transmit
               tx-size: 1500
 
User avatar
interpoint
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 3:42 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Nov 03, 2016 10:17 pm

Greetings from Ireland !!

Firstly: Many thanks for providing this very useful btest facility.

We also had problems with the CHR's running on VMware ESXi 6.0 using Hotlava 10G Cards.

We experienced the VMware host would "Pink Screen of Death" complaining about the Network card approx once every 6 weeks approx.

We gave up and moved to CHR1072. It is not as good for BGP convergence on a CCR1072, however it doesn't crash - which is way more important :D

BGP Convergence of 1080219 routes to the Internet is around 20 minutes after startup. Single core limitation.

Did this test from one of our CCR1072's - she was RX'ing at 1G of live traffic at the time when I ran this test.

We have a 10G connection to the Internet on the CCR1072

Interesting that I can pull 2Gbps (on the RX) from your test server but can only manage 1.2Gbps (TX) to your test server.

[XXXXX@CCR1] > /tool bandwidth-test direction=receive local-tx-speed=2000M remote-tx-speed=2000M user=btest password=btest protocol=udp address=207.32.195.2
status: running
duration: 10s
rx-current: 1917.1Mbps
rx-10-second-average: 1918.8Mbps
rx-total-average: 1918.8Mbps
lost-packets: 0
random-data: no
direction: receive
rx-size: 1500

[XXXXX@CCR1] > /tool bandwidth-test direction=transmit local-tx-speed=2000M remote-tx-speed=2000M user=btest password=btest protocol=udp address=207.32.195.2
status: running
duration: 14s
tx-current: 1219.2Mbps
tx-10-second-average: 1180.7Mbps
tx-total-average: 1153.7Mbps
random-data: no
direction: transmit
tx-size: 1500

I have 19 hops between your router and mine.
capture.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Shane Hartigan
Director - Integrated Media Solutions
MikroTik Certified Trainer
MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCINE, MTCTCE, MTCIPv6E
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Nov 04, 2016 5:26 pm

interpoint

Greetings from Ireland !!

Firstly: Many thanks for providing this very useful btest facility.
....


Hey - thanks for the feedback.

I am very interested in possibly changing the 207.32.195.2 btest server from a 32-bit ROS system running under VMware ESXi 6.something to a physical mikrotik hardware solution with 10-gig network cards.
I know that btest only uses 1 CPU when there are multi-cores available. Thus a btest server comes down to CPU clock speed to function well as a btest server.
So - I would like to ask you a favor please
On any of your Mikrotik platforms with 10-gig Ethernet, what do you get when you do a UDP btest to 127.0.0.1 ???
If I can find something that cat run at or near 10-gig, I want to try to switch the 207.32.195.2 btest server over to it - then see if it can handle the load while still delivering same speed results.

again - thanks for your post

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
Makoto
newbie
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 3:24 pm

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Nov 08, 2016 10:51 am

Hi,

is servers still runing ? I did try few times last couple of days but never able to connect !

It would be so cool if Mikrotik has someting like that for at least 100Mbit test:)!
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Nov 08, 2016 2:42 pm

Hi,

is servers still runing ? I did try few times last couple of days but never able to connect !

It would be so cool if Mikrotik has someting like that for at least 100Mbit test:)!
Yea it's running. Uptime about a week or so.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Nov 08, 2016 7:52 pm

Hi,

is servers still runing ? I did try few times last couple of days but never able to connect !

It would be so cool if Mikrotik has someting like that for at least 100Mbit test:)!
Have you been able to test to it in the past ?
Can you ping it ?
Is your Mikrotik behind a firewall ?
 
RonJohn63
newbie
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 10:04 pm

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Nov 08, 2016 10:01 pm

Hi,

is servers still runing ? I did try few times last couple of days but never able to connect !

It would be so cool if Mikrotik has someting like that for at least 100Mbit test:)!
I had the same problem, then enabled logging on the FW rule chain=input action=drop tcp-flags="" in-interface=ether1 log=no log-prefix="" and saw tons of drops.

Thus, I added this just above that rule:
add action=accept chain=input comment="IP address of public bandwidth tester" protocol=udp src-address=207.32.195.2
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Nov 09, 2016 4:12 am

:shock: Well - my x86 ROS 32-bit locked up again and I had to restart it

It locked up at California USA time 2016/11/08 17:49:23 ((( 5:49 PM ))

It is back up now

I am glad I don't use this as a primary high-bandwidth router.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
Makoto
newbie
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 3:24 pm

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Nov 10, 2016 10:38 am

Hi,

no I did not able to test in the past but I am able to ping the server, maybe it is firewall but not mine !
In a few days I am geting new dedicate line I whill try then!
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Nov 10, 2016 3:39 pm

Hi,

no I did not able to test in the past but I am able to ping the server, maybe it is firewall but not mine !
In a few days I am geting new dedicate line I whill try then!
Hmmm

Please post a tracefoute from your mikrotik

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
Makoto
newbie
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2013 3:24 pm

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Nov 11, 2016 10:48 am

Hi

timeout at the moment :) !

I can try again later
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Nov 11, 2016 7:43 pm

Hi

timeout at the moment :) !

I can try again later
Yup - my Mikrotik ROS x86 32-bit btest server was locked up again. I reset it and it should be running again.

I have a question to everybody - does anybody have a Mikrotik anything that is actually standing up to gig+ sustained routed bandwidth loads (like what my btest server goes through) ?

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
jasko
just joined
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:11 pm
Location: Argentina
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Nov 16, 2016 1:29 pm

jasko - re I would ask you: How to configure a user to just have permission on the banwidth-test tool of the server?

Rather than type the answer to your question, I just made some image snapshots.
Is this what you was asking for ?

North Idaho Tom Jones
btest-user.png
Thanks Tom,
that was the answer I need

Great work!!
 
User avatar
HumanDamned
newbie
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 11:21 am
Location: Tallinn

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Sat Nov 19, 2016 12:11 am

Subject: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server
Here are the details for my server:
- x86 ROS hosted on VMware ESXi server (with 10-gig connection to the Internet)
- Burstable to 250 Meg up/down
- Sustained traffic is limited to 100 Meg up/down (after about 30 to 60 seconds)
- Your maximum connection time for testing is not to exceed 10 minutes.
- IP Address: 207.32.195.2
- btest user authentication needed: User: btest Password: btest
- You may NOT winbox to this machine - you may bandwidth test to it.
Hi and Thanks for the server, but i cant understand why Btest to your server shows average TCP Tx Rx 15.0 Mbps/49.5 Mbps and speedtest.net - Tx Rx 661 Mbps/641 Mbps ?
The result are so much different...
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Sat Nov 19, 2016 1:53 am

Subject: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server
Here are the details for my server:
- x86 ROS hosted on VMware ESXi server (with 10-gig connection to the Internet)
- Burstable to 250 Meg up/down
- Sustained traffic is limited to 100 Meg up/down (after about 30 to 60 seconds)
- Your maximum connection time for testing is not to exceed 10 minutes.
- IP Address: 207.32.195.2
- btest user authentication needed: User: btest Password: btest
- You may NOT winbox to this machine - you may bandwidth test to it.
Hi and Thanks for the server, but i cant understand why Btest to your server shows average TCP Tx Rx 15.0 Mbps/49.5 Mbps and speedtest.net - Tx Rx 661 Mbps/641 Mbps ?
The result are so much different...
My guess would be the speedtest.net server you are testing to might be closer than my btest server.
Try a speedtest.net speedtest using Seattle and see if that looks near the same as my btest server.
Also - are you btest ing using UDP or TCP? UDP should be faster.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
HumanDamned
newbie
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 11:21 am
Location: Tallinn

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Sat Nov 19, 2016 1:16 pm

My guess would be the speedtest.net server you are testing to might be closer than my btest server.
Try a speedtest.net speedtest using Seattle and see if that looks near the same as my btest server.
Also - are you btest ing using UDP or TCP? UDP should be faster.
Oh, I see, it's in USA, then maybe that is the reason. I'm using TCP because speedtest also uses TCP, just wanted to compare the results.
Today results are - Btest up 31.8 Mbps/ down 66.4 Mbps and speedtest to Seattle up 697 Mbps/ down 141 Mbps.
Really crazy =)
 
gunguy7007
just joined
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 4:15 pm

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Nov 22, 2016 4:16 pm

Thank you, this helps a ton in troubleshooting.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Nov 23, 2016 12:55 am

I just updated the 207.32.195.2 btest server (on 11/22/2016 3:PM California time) to the new ROS release v6.37.2

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
Yarisken
just joined
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 6:34 pm

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:55 pm

Thx for the tool :-). Working great here.
 
kevgits
just joined
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 2:08 pm

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Nov 25, 2016 12:54 pm

Hi,

I'm trying to ping the server from Kenya and it's timing out. Could you kindly confirm if it's running?

C:\Users\TOSH>ping 207.32.195.2

Pinging 207.32.195.2 with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.

On the mikrotik it returns the error "can't connect".
 
fabvit
just joined
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2016 11:07 am

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Nov 25, 2016 6:05 pm

As of today for me too the server is not pingable (Rome, Italy)
 
User avatar
dash
newbie
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 12:05 pm

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Nov 25, 2016 10:37 pm

same here
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:31 pm

x86 ROS under load has a MTBF (meat time before failure) of less than 1 day. This is across all versions of x86 ROS for the last year.

If you can not ping or btest to this server, it is 99.999 percent because it locked up again. This btest server sometimes has to be reset up to 3 times a day.

I can only hope that CHR or anything else is better at faster than gig btest speeds.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
mp3turbo
just joined
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 9:24 pm

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Nov 29, 2016 1:15 am

Tom, what locks up ? Is it the x86 ROS virtual machine or is the whole physical server crashing under the load ? Can you post DETAILED information about your HW config especially about NW cards their models etc, versions of BIOS, ILO/DRAC card firmware if you have HP/Dell hardware (or equivalent of other vendors') ? If you have white box ("home made" computer), please post motherboard name, BIOS version.

Ideally in both cases, screenshots of BIOS settings would be great. Especially PCI Latency Timer, if you have one.

I'm running virtualized x86 ROSes with 100.0% uptime for years and yes, I have big bandwidths.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Nov 29, 2016 3:39 pm

Tom, what locks up ? Is it the x86 ROS virtual machine or is the whole physical server crashing under the load ? Can you post DETAILED information about your HW config especially about NW cards their models etc, versions of BIOS, ILO/DRAC card firmware if you have HP/Dell hardware (or equivalent of other vendors') ? If you have white box ("home made" computer), please post motherboard name, BIOS version.

Ideally in both cases, screenshots of BIOS settings would be great. Especially PCI Latency Timer, if you have one.

I'm running virtualized x86 ROSes with 100.0% uptime for years and yes, I have big bandwidths.
I am running the following configuration:
- Physical server: I have tried Dell but now I run on a SuperMicro (SAS 12 tb hdd and 127 gig ram and intel 10-gig nics and two Xeon CPUs 10-core each with a crap-load of CPU cache.)
- Boot operating system on physical server: VMware ESXi 6.0.0 (I have also run ESXi version 5.x
- btest server is an x86 ROS 32-bit server (have tried many different fresh installs from scratch).
- Virtual host (ROS) configuration: Memory 2 gig - CPUs (Tried 1,2,3 and 4) currently 1 - HDD thin 8 Gig - single Network card E1000E

I have rebuilt and replaces and reconfigured everything to do with the btest server dozens of times.

I currently have 20 other additional virtual host servers/routers also running on my VMware ESXi machine. None of the other virtual routers (PfSense) or other virtual servers (DNS, sendmail, apache, radius, syslog, cacti etc ...) ever lock up. The only thing that locks up is ROS - never anything else.

When ROS locks up, it appears to be a complete loss of the TCP/IP stack. When it is locked up, the console is still alive and there is still an Ethernet link - but anything to do with IP anything is dead. When locked up, ROS can not even ping it's local loopback address of 127.0.0.1

If I had to take a guess at what the problem is, I would start with a guess that the ROS lack of paravirtual network drivers/support is the biggest potential problem. In my opinion, any x86 operating system without full set of paravirtual (tools, HDD, network, KVM) is pretty much a trusted brick if you are building a house - and only a brick.

It is very frustrating !!! I pretty much give x86 ROS a rating (0 to 10) of a solid -8 (negative 8), and I suggest in a virtual routing environment to instead use PfSense for stability to achieve a never crash virtual environment.

Don't get me wrong and think I am down/against Mikrotik - I totally love ROS and Mikrotik has the best bang for the buck when it comes to wireless products. I know - I have more than 1,000 Mikrotik wireless devices. But when it comes to central core greater than 1-gig throughput processing, this I don't feel Mikrotik is a solution. In my opinion, Mikrotik uses slow cheap wimpy weak CPUs and are unable to reliably compete in the 500 meg to over 10-gig market. I am under the option that Mikrotik has nothing that can reliably handle the sustained often greater than 1-gig btest loads my btest server gets every day. However - for small office and residential use (less than 300 meg), mikrotik has some good products to consider.

North Idaho Tom Jones
Last edited by TomjNorthIdaho on Tue Nov 29, 2016 3:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Nov 29, 2016 3:46 pm

One thing I will add,

It appears that when somebody is running a btest at high speeds (800 meg up to 10-gig), is when the ROS TCP/IP stack dies.

and note - I have some PfSense virtual routers on the same VmWare server often holding that sustained amount of traffic (near 8-gig sustained) for sometimes several hours.
 
User avatar
chechito
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1746
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2014 3:14 am
Location: Bogota Colombia
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Dec 01, 2016 6:58 pm

Subject: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server
EDIT: Feb 24 2016 --- Now supports up to 3.5 Gig speedtest - read all the posts
EDIT: October 7th 2016 --- This btest server now supports 3.6 Gig for both send and receive tests - please read through all the posts
thx very much for the server Tom

I have tested successfully a gpon connection of 120mbps/60mbps udp and tcp with a RB750Gr2
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:57 pm

Subject: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server
EDIT: Feb 24 2016 --- Now supports up to 3.5 Gig speedtest - read all the posts
EDIT: October 7th 2016 --- This btest server now supports 3.6 Gig for both send and receive tests - please read through all the posts
thx very much for the server Tom

I have tested successfully a gpon connection of 120mbps/60mbps udp and tcp with a RB750Gr2
Re: I have tested successfully a gpon connection of 120mbps/60mbps udp and tcp with a RB750Gr2
chechito - right now you are new best friend :)

I am trying to bring up a Mikrotik SFP GPON in one of my Mikrotiks.
My head-end to terminate my customer GPON devices is an Adtran TA-5000

I have some questions I would like to ask you.
Is your GPON network using a Mikrotik SFP GPON in a Mikrotik ?
Or is your GPON non-Mikrotik and you simply have a Mikrotik connected ?

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
chechito
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1746
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2014 3:14 am
Location: Bogota Colombia
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Dec 02, 2016 1:13 am

Re: I have tested successfully a gpon connection of 120mbps/60mbps udp and tcp with a RB750Gr2
chechito - right now you are new best friend :)

I am trying to bring up a Mikrotik SFP GPON in one of my Mikrotiks.
My head-end to terminate my customer GPON devices is an Adtran TA-5000

I have some questions I would like to ask you.
Is your GPON network using a Mikrotik SFP GPON in a Mikrotik ?
Or is your GPON non-Mikrotik and you simply have a Mikrotik connected ?

North Idaho Tom Jones
Sorry My isp brings a CPE which receive optical fiber directly, behind it i connect MIkrotik with ethernet copper
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Dec 02, 2016 6:25 pm

FYI: I just upgraded the Mikrotik ROS 32-bit public btest 207.32.195.2 server to version 6.37.3

When I did this - I know I bumped somebody off who was doing a btest at the time - sorry about that

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:57 pm

FYI: December 7th 2016
I just replaced the Mikrotik ROS 32-bit public btest 207.32.195.2 server.
It is now a CHR 64-bit system.
It is hosted on the same VMware ESXi server which hosted the older 32-bit x86 ROS server.

So far it appears to have the same throughput capabilities. A local btest to the loopback 127.0.0.1 comes out between 18 to 19 gig.

There is still a simple-queue which limits peak testing to 3.6 gig up or down (and also limits sustained testing down to about 500 meg).

You are welcome to hammer away on it.
I would like to find out and verify if CHR is more stable/reliable under the same peak loads when compared to the original 32-bit ROS btest server.

btest server: 207.32.195.2
user: btest
password: btest
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8319
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Dec 08, 2016 1:01 am

Just tested, 3.6G down (to me)/1875M up with UDP

Well... Wow :) I'm from Belarus, it's 8500km from Idaho =) RTT is 185 ms

With TCP it's only 1550M down/540M up

By the way, "Lost Packets: 0" after 5 seconds at 3.6G :D
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Dec 08, 2016 2:46 am

Just tested, 3.6G down (to me)/1875M up with UDP

Well... Wow :) I'm from Belarus, it's 8500km from Idaho =) RTT is 185 ms

With TCP it's only 1550M down/540M up

By the way, "Lost Packets: 0" after 5 seconds at 3.6G :D
Hey - sounds like you have a greater than 3.6 gig internet feed
If you ever want to do a brief no bandwidth test - just let me know
It would be interesting to see what it can go up to ...
North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Dec 13, 2016 3:34 pm

Interesting, since upgrading from 32-bit x86 ROS to CHR on December 7th 2016, the btest server has not locked-up/died.
Normally I would of performed up to 15 resets/reboots by now.
I can only guess that the paravirtulized 10-gig network card drivers "vmxnet3" are working correctly.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Dec 14, 2016 6:51 pm

Hope ya don't mind if I ask ...

Would somebody happen to be running a CHR or 32-bit ROS on a Amazon Web Services (AWS) account ?

This is not a problem. I just happened to look at who was connected to the 207.32.195.2 btest server and spotted a connection from AWS.

My question for you, what kind of throughput and processing ability are you able to get with AWS ?

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
marting
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 169
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 2:07 pm

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:22 pm

Thank you for providing this server!

Although I wonder why ROS does not correctly track their own BTEST UDP/Receive connections. I have same issue with UDP Receving like some other in this thread. I allow ESTABLISHED&RELATED in input and forward chain. But I have to disable my REJECT chains for UDP for the BTEST packets not to drop. Of course I could allow my btest IPs but in my opinion this should be covered by the connection tracking.
 
yoozieck
just joined
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:08 pm

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Dec 22, 2016 10:43 am

Hello,
Is there any problem with the 207.32.195.2 test server?
I cannot connect today, nor can't ping it, this is my traceroute:
Image

but using ping.eu comes with transmitted/received packets 100% success.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Dec 22, 2016 6:52 pm

Hello,
Is there any problem with the 207.32.195.2 test server?
I cannot connect today, nor can't ping it, this is my traceroute:
Image

but using ping.eu comes with transmitted/received packets 100% success.
Yea - it was down
in fact my entire network was down
huge spanning tree issue and native vlan issues across hundreds of network devices.

It should be up and running normally now.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Dec 22, 2016 7:20 pm

Heads up -
Because I am still having some network problems (non-related to Mikrotik anything), I have turned off the 207.32.195.2 public btest server.
It will remain turned off until mid next week.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Dec 22, 2016 9:19 pm

new feature wish list for Mikrotik ROS and CHR

I would like to see a new feature option in the bandwidth test setting (for server and clinet), where there is a new setting for maximum amount of time a btest can be performed.

Example:
- Where somebody connected up to my 207.32.195.2 btest server (from their client ROS/CHR device) and no matter what, the test will terminate after a set number of HH:MM:SS has elapsed.

This would be great for both client and server in btest.

One of the potential issues I often see with my 207.32.195.2 btest server is that somebody starts a btest to me and lets it run all night long. This can force the simple-queue to kick in after a few minutes and then slow down everything to what ever I have my simple-queue set for. When this happens, a second remote person wanting to also run a btest to my server may not be able to connect or get slower-than-normal results - or possibly not able to run a btest at all.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
yoozieck
just joined
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:08 pm

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Dec 23, 2016 12:06 am

Heads up -
Because I am still having some network problems (non-related to Mikrotik anything), I have turned off the 207.32.195.2 public btest server.
It will remain turned off until mid next week.

North Idaho Tom Jones
Thanks for your response.
I want to thank you, you are doing great work. Hope you'll get server running quick.
Merry Christmas from Poland to you, North Idaho Tom Jones, and to the whole forum :)
 
biland
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:01 pm
Location: tuxtepec, mexico
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Mon Dec 26, 2016 1:53 am

merry cristmas
and i love this server :)
on each mikrotik i can proof the speed for my client localy, without going there and show it on his windows..
does anybody know another server you can use, for the same mather (even slower, i dont mind)
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Dec 27, 2016 6:28 pm

I just turned back on the public 207.32.195.2 btest server

Please - no 10+ minute continuous extended bandwidth tests.
It's OK to use - but please don't do lengthy tests. Recently I've had some tests that have lasted for several hours or more.

I hope everybody had a good holiday - and will have a good New Years.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Dec 27, 2016 10:55 pm

here is what i was able to test at on a 10gbps comcast fiber connection. Thank you for the public btest site.
1-traceroute.png
2-udp-15-seconds.png
3-tcp-15-seconds.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Dec 27, 2016 11:04 pm

here are two other random speed tests from beta.speedtest.net and speedtest.googlefiber.net
4-beta-speedtest-net.png
5-speedtest-googlefiber.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Tue Dec 27, 2016 11:17 pm

On your hop 9 - it looks like there is a pretty big latency hit in Seattle - which is where I go through.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Dec 28, 2016 12:08 am

I still think it looks good though. I have run a few tests with a dslreports.com admin and have had semi mixed results. Not Mikrotik related but just in general with high speed links. on my end, windows 10 is for sure the weak link. Some live Linux examples do better but anything above a few gigabit seem less reliable. I am using a CCR1036 with the 2 port sfp+.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Dec 28, 2016 12:49 am

I still think it looks good though. I have run a few tests with a dslreports.com admin and have had semi mixed results. Not Mikrotik related but just in general with high speed links. on my end, windows 10 is for sure the weak link. Some live Linux examples do better but anything above a few gigabit seem less reliable. I am using a CCR1036 with the 2 port sfp+.
FYI -
Try turning off the firewalls on your Windows 10 machine and killing all in-necessary programs (anti-virus ...)
And try disabling hyper-threading on your Windows 10 machine
Sometimes - this will kick up the testing speeds on your Win 10 machine

Tom Jones
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Wed Dec 28, 2016 1:27 am

Roger that. I am into tuning process queues on the intel nic. I have tested a variety of settings in the ccr and the hp switch. So far rss on the nic and buffer size seem to have the most impact on a single host. I have a number of servers and to the best of my testing tengb is great in aggregate. Although I dare to get the best desktop test yet. :)
 
macns
just joined
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2014 12:36 pm

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Dec 30, 2016 11:53 am

Can't thank you enough for this. It has proven to be a most reliable tool whether we use it for debug or just rate checking.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Dec 30, 2016 6:20 pm

Thought I would post a brief summary of the 207.32.195.2 btest server total data passed.
On average, since original activation in January 2016:

- The btest traffic averages out to the equivalent amount of data transferred as a sustained 40 meg load (yearly total average).
- It has had hundreds of btest testing faster than 1-gig (up and down)
- On average, somebody is testing to it about 20 percent of the time.
- At peak times, I have seen it busy all day with different testers
- CHR appears to work well as a btest server.
- I do not suggest an x86 ROS btest server - it tends to die under heavy btest loads.
- Because my Internet account is pretty fast, I have never felt any slowdown in my network while anybody is running a faster than gig btest.
- Surprisingly, I do not think the btest server has been used in a negative way by anybody to create problems & network congestion intended to make problems to other ISPs or Internet networks.

--- Also, thank you for posting your btest results and where you are in the world. I think this information helps everybody.

I plan to keep it running in 2018

EDIT - Kinda funny, I remember when I first proposed a day of public btest servers... Somebody commented "The day the Internet died." - lol

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
jarda
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 7604
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:46 pm

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Fri Dec 30, 2016 11:32 pm

Hope you can keep it running in 2017 so far.
I am glad you gave the chance to chr as I suggested even you were not believe in it originally.
Happy new year to you and all over the world!

And please, do not copy one reply over dozen of threads. It was not nice from you...
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Sat Dec 31, 2016 12:24 am

Hope you can keep it running in 2017 so far.
I am glad you gave the chance to chr as I suggested even you were not believe in it originally.
Happy new year to you and all over the world!

And please, do not copy one reply over dozen of threads. It was not nice from you...
Your point is noted

My poor excuse is - I was trying to put-to-rest several un-answered threads with the same related topic.

FYI - It would be nice if there were some additional static forum topics (instead of General) for key places to look/read/post on topics such as (GPON, ROS wish-lists, VPNs, 802.1q/Vlans, VRF, Walled-Garden/Captive-Portal/Rate-Limiting, how-other-ISPs-WISPs-Do-It, managing-large-quantities-of-Mikrotiks) which only contain these specific topics - instead of having a General where anything else often end up over and over again.
Just my two cents ...

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
jarda
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 7604
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:46 pm

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Sat Dec 31, 2016 12:31 am

You could answer in one thread and link all others to it. Normally people would stay in there if they would like to reply so you could effectively join all the open topics to one which continues further. But never mind - just a sidenote.
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Sun Jan 01, 2017 7:50 pm

Tom and crew,
I have setup a test CHR too. lets see what happens with results on this 10gbps uncapped CHR. I have limited the CHR to 50 concurrent sessions.

Host: btest.planetcoop.com
ipv4: 50.235.23.218
ipv6: 2001:559:8062::20
user and pass: btest
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Tue Jan 03, 2017 9:00 pm

Tom, i didnt mean to hijack the forum post. i have seen a number of tests.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Tue Jan 03, 2017 10:19 pm

Tom, i didnt mean to hijack the forum post. i have seen a number of tests.
Hey - you are not hijacking anything ...
It's great that you are also offering a btest server also. (+1)

I think it benefits all Mikrotik admins , including you and myself.
You posts/messages are much welcome ...

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Tue Jan 03, 2017 10:57 pm

 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jan 04, 2017 12:17 am

Question - what are you using to collect the SNMP information on your CHR and making the web page public ?

Myself - I use Cacti on everything.

FYI - the "5 Minute Average" is almost not a real measurement. Let's say you have almost zero traffic for 4 minutes 40 seconds, then somebody hits the btest server at gig + speeds - know what I mean ...


North Idaho Tom Jones
 
dadoremix
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 119
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 11:31 am

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jan 04, 2017 12:22 am

These graps are from mikrotik
Tools/graphing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jan 04, 2017 12:27 am

These graps are from mikrotik
Tools/graphing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
OK - I am gonna take a stab at it and see how to configure it on my btest server also ...
North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jan 04, 2017 12:30 am

These graps are from mikrotik
Tools/graphing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
OK - I am gonna take a stab at it and see how to configure it on my btest server also ...
North Idaho Tom Jones
Wow - that was easy :)
http://207.32.195.2/graphs/iface/ether1/
 
dadoremix
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 119
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 11:31 am

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jan 04, 2017 12:52 am

Anyone have big speed/bw in eu?
Ping to your tom from me is 227ms from croatia
And net is 150/75Mbit
Max for buy is 500/500 by optik


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jan 04, 2017 2:13 am

These graps are from mikrotik
Tools/graphing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
OK - I am gonna take a stab at it and see how to configure it on my btest server also ...
North Idaho Tom Jones
Wow - that was easy :)
http://207.32.195.2/graphs/iface/ether1/
I also use observium FREE and solarwinds Orion, not free. i also know you can share cacti graphs anonymously and its also FREE. I am trying to find out if observium can share anon links too.
Small Graph https://observium.planetcoop.com/graph. ... legend=yes
Large Graph https://observium.planetcoop.com/graph. ... width=1152
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8319
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:42 pm

using 'read' group for 'btest' user is probably not a good idea. anybody can login to the router and see its configuration, even sensitive information
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
Boter
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 73
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 9:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:01 pm

I've been looking for this for a long time. Thanks! I cant find icon to give the reputation. Just great. Now I can really test bandwidth without killing the cpu.
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jan 04, 2017 6:45 pm

using 'read' group for 'btest' user is probably not a good idea. anybody can login to the router and see its configuration, even sensitive information
The good news is this is a dedicated chr for btest. The other side of it is to share info. Is there a way to restrict some of the more sensitive config parts while still allowing some read? In the mean time i have restricted the box btest user to a limited test group.
 
majestic
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 81
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2016 11:19 am

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jan 04, 2017 9:13 pm

I just wanted to say, thank you for the access to your test servers. Its helped me dearly to tweak my QoS rules so I can now saturate the line without breakups.
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Thu Jan 05, 2017 12:44 am

using 'read' group for 'btest' user is probably not a good idea. anybody can login to the router and see its configuration, even sensitive information
The good news is this is a dedicated chr for btest. The other side of it is to share info. Is there a way to restrict some of the more sensitive config parts while still allowing some read? In the mean time i have restricted the box btest user to a limited test group.
I have ironed out the permissions to "test" and "winbox". It looks like permissions have not been working most of the day but i was just able to reset them and complete several tests. Have fun testing and thank you for recommending the permissions review.
 
emikrotik
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 71
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 9:30 am

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Jan 05, 2017 1:14 am

Hope ya don't mind if I ask ...

Would somebody happen to be running a CHR or 32-bit ROS on a Amazon Web Services (AWS) account ?

This is not a problem. I just happened to look at who was connected to the 207.32.195.2 btest server and spotted a connection from AWS.

My question for you, what kind of throughput and processing ability are you able to get with AWS ?

North Idaho Tom Jones
Hello,

I am running CHR 3.37.3 on a t2.medium instance on AWS Singapore 1b.

Download I am getting ~140Mbps
Upload I am getting 1Mbps

Is anyone else getting slow upload speeds from AWS Singapore?

When I run a cli bandwidth from a centos 7 box behind CHR I am only getting 1Mbps download/upload.
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Thu Jan 05, 2017 4:51 am

Hope ya don't mind if I ask ...

Would somebody happen to be running a CHR or 32-bit ROS on a Amazon Web Services (AWS) account ?

This is not a problem. I just happened to look at who was connected to the 207.32.195.2 btest server and spotted a connection from AWS.

My question for you, what kind of throughput and processing ability are you able to get with AWS ?

North Idaho Tom Jones
Hello,

I am running CHR 3.37.3 on a t2.medium instance on AWS Singapore 1b.

Download I am getting ~140Mbps
Upload I am getting 1Mbps

Is anyone else getting slow upload speeds from AWS Singapore?

When I run a cli bandwidth from a centos 7 box behind CHR I am only getting 1Mbps download/upload.
Verify the license as a demo license is limited to 1mb/s and i cant remember what i had seen before, but i think it was a TX limit or a RX limit, not both. I have also run the CHR prior to production release like an RC and had odd btest numbers.
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8319
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Thu Jan 05, 2017 1:03 pm

Is there a way to restrict some of the more sensitive config parts while still allowing some read?
looks like 'sensitive' permission is what you're looking for :) uncheck it
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri Jan 06, 2017 9:15 am

So, not sure who pulled this off, but a 9.9Gbps out bound test for several minutes? I realize the whole test was not that fast but happen to capture some data. I have also save a copy of the larger Observium graph for the time. I then though to capture the CPU load on the CCR 1036 that was performing the NAT from public to private IPv4 space in LAN. Notice in the year of 10Gbps internet I have not seen that kind of CPU load and sustained bandwidth usage.
btest-1.png
btest-2.png
btest-3.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
macsrwe
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 655
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 5:43 am
Location: Arizona, USA
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri Jan 06, 2017 5:23 pm

Thank you! Discovered my go-to speed-test servers were both out of service, just as I needed to use them to test and accept a speed upgrade cutover. Found yours in the nick of time. I need a good external speed-test server for about three minutes a half dozen times a year. Really, really hope you are able to keep offering this service without suffering abuse problems.
 
emikrotik
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 71
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 9:30 am

Re: 3.6 GIG - Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server

Mon Jan 09, 2017 7:42 am

Hope ya don't mind if I ask ...

Would somebody happen to be running a CHR or 32-bit ROS on a Amazon Web Services (AWS) account ?

This is not a problem. I just happened to look at who was connected to the 207.32.195.2 btest server and spotted a connection from AWS.

My question for you, what kind of throughput and processing ability are you able to get with AWS ?

North Idaho Tom Jones
Hello,

I am running CHR 3.37.3 on a t2.medium instance on AWS Singapore 1b.

Download I am getting ~140Mbps
Upload I am getting 1Mbps

Is anyone else getting slow upload speeds from AWS Singapore?

When I run a cli bandwidth from a centos 7 box behind CHR I am only getting 1Mbps download/upload.
Verify the license as a demo license is limited to 1mb/s and i cant remember what i had seen before, but i think it was a TX limit or a RX limit, not both. I have also run the CHR prior to production release like an RC and had odd btest numbers.
Thank you. This was the issue, after purchasing a P1 license I am now getting good transfer speeds.

On a t2.xlarge instance in Singapore I was getting ~370Mbps upload/download.
On a t2.nano instance in Singapore I am getting ~600Mbps download and ~190Mbps upload.
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Mon Jan 09, 2017 11:50 pm

 
gotsprings
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 801
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 9:30 pm

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Mon Jan 16, 2017 7:12 pm

Just tried this for the first time. THANK YOU!!!

Numbers match speedtest.

I am in the DC metro area.

Your server tested from one of my APs.
65.6 Mbps/59.1 Mbps

My laptop against the Fios Server
65.48 / 57.88
"It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so."
Mark Twain
 
Zorro
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 676
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:43 pm

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Feb 01, 2017 11:39 am

ROS still not scale well over multi-core and many-core processors. (as does Linux they built ROS around)
orginal Tilera "Zero Overhead Linux" tailored by them for platform are built Enteriely differently with lot of stuff "in userspace", which Completely interfere with "minimal footprint/bloating" ROS approach and "ductape netfilter to kernel" -esque minimalism :)
to achieve similar scalability without moving to similar framework MT may adopt LWKT from DragonflyBSD and DFBSD kernel in future.
combined with Erlang-written code it allow achieve Impressive scalabilty in many-core, and in Distributed systems.
 
alexandrecorrea
just joined
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: Sacramento, MG, Brasil
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Thu Feb 09, 2017 3:45 am

Nice service !!! btw, our CCR1036-8g-2S+ can only btest 2.5gbit/s (cpu running btest goes to 100%).
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Thu Feb 09, 2017 3:51 am

Nice service !!! btw, our CCR1036-8g-2S+ can only btest 2.5gbit/s (cpu running btest goes to 100%).
Nice test, i see the traffic. What connection type did you test with, Comcast Gigabit-Pro? I ask due to the locations you listed in your profile. :) My server is in Roseville, CA
 
alexandrecorrea
just joined
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: Sacramento, MG, Brasil
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Thu Feb 09, 2017 3:59 am

Testing from Brazil (city: Sacramento, State: Minas Gerais)

17 hops away !!!
bbbbbbbbbb.png
router interface:
ccccccccccccc.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Thu Feb 09, 2017 7:04 pm

Questions re the Mikrotik CCR1036-8g-2S and btest throughput

Q1: What kind of UDP bandwidth btest speed to you get when you test to 127.0.0.1 (your local loopback address) ?

Q2: Can the CCR1036-8g-2S be over clocked ? (Winbox -> System -> Routerboard -> Settings -> CPU Frequency)

If so, I have found the following results on all of my Mikrotik devices:
- #1; Overclocking to the second to fastest speed always works
- #2; Overclocking to the fastest speed -almost- always works (sometimes it is not stable and then I have to back down to the second to fastest speed available)
- #3; Overclocking always improves throughput. (to verify this - best to 127.0.0.1 at the default CPU speed - then btest again to 127.0.0.1 with the CPU overclocked).
- #4; Overclocking almost never increases Ethernet switched ports, but always increases Ethernet software bridged ports (and increases routing throughput).
- #5; I have about 100 Mikrotik APs (5 GHz running NV2) and throughput on all of them has increased some when the APs and/or/also Clients are overclocked.
- #6; I have a very busy, heavy traffic WDS link between two Mikrotik 922UAGS-5HPacD (AC only & HT chain 0-and-1 & NV2 & channel width 20/40/80) distance about 13 km & average link connect speed greater than 468 meg) , when both ends are overclocked to the maximum, it always runs much faster.
- - - If you test this , please post any btest throughput results. I am interested if others are also seeing a difference.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
alexandrecorrea
just joined
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: Sacramento, MG, Brasil
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Thu Feb 09, 2017 7:36 pm

Q1: 900Mbit/s (cpu core goes to 100%)

Q2: max 1200mhz
Questions re the Mikrotik CCR1036-8g-2S and btest throughput

Q1: What kind of UDP bandwidth btest speed to you get when you test to 127.0.0.1 (your local loopback address) ?

Q2: Can the CCR1036-8g-2S be over clocked ? (Winbox -> System -> Routerboard -> Settings -> CPU Frequency)

If so, I have found the following results on all of my Mikrotik devices:
- #1; Overclocking to the second to fastest speed always works
- #2; Overclocking to the fastest speed -almost- always works (sometimes it is not stable and then I have to back down to the second to fastest speed available)
- #3; Overclocking always improves throughput. (to verify this - best to 127.0.0.1 at the default CPU speed - then btest again to 127.0.0.1 with the CPU overclocked).
- #4; Overclocking almost never increases Ethernet switched ports, but always increases Ethernet software bridged ports (and increases routing throughput).
- #5; I have about 100 Mikrotik APs (5 GHz running NV2) and throughput on all of them has increased some when the APs and/or/also Clients are overclocked.
- #6; I have a very busy, heavy traffic WDS link between two Mikrotik 922UAGS-5HPacD (AC only & HT chain 0-and-1 & NV2 & channel width 20/40/80) distance about 13 km & average link connect speed greater than 468 meg) , when both ends are overclocked to the maximum, it always runs much faster.
- - - If you test this , please post any btest throughput results. I am interested if others are also seeing a difference.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Thu Feb 09, 2017 7:51 pm

FYI re: Q1

Slightly unrelated to a Mikrotik CCR1036-8g-2S

My Mikrotik CHR (public 207.32.195.2 btest server) - Virtual machine running on a very busy VMware ESXi server :

Just now tested: 18.2 Gbps

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Thu Feb 09, 2017 8:07 pm

I did ok on a busy server and 4 core CHR @ 16.8Gbps. From what i have seen the btest application is single core per session test. its worth mention that my topology is a ccr1036 with 2sfp+ on the edge running IPv4 nat and IPv6 L3. The CHR is behind that with a nat'ed IPv4 and Public IPv6 address.
You can see the individual CPU cores on the CCR:
https://observium.planetcoop.com/graph. ... width=1152
You can see the individual CPU cores on the CHR:
https://observium.planetcoop.com/graph. ... width=1152
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Thu Feb 09, 2017 9:03 pm

The VMware ESXi box I run my CHR on is a SuperMicro has two 10-core Xeon processors with HyperThreading enabled ( 40 logical processors ).
My VMware Summery reports:
20 CPUs x 2.999 Ghz
Intel Xeon CPU E5-2690 V2 @ 3.00 GHz
Logical Processors: 40

My CHR has only one CPU and 2 Gig RAM and one VMXNET-3 network card allocated to it via my VmWare ESXi hyper-visor.

In my opinion - It's not only CPU clock speed that counts , it's also the amount of CPU cache built into the processor. CPU cache memory is way way way faster than external RAM on the motherboard. I am pretty confident that most of my active CHR stuff is probably running mostly in CPU cache most of the time.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Thu Feb 09, 2017 10:02 pm

Really close in hardware
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8319
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri Feb 10, 2017 12:43 am

Q1: 900Mbit/s (cpu core goes to 100%)
huh... my ccr-1036-2g-2s+ shows ~400 Mbps... ROS v6.33
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
whitbread
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 108
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 9:55 pm

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Sat Feb 11, 2017 2:59 pm

RB2011UiAS and RB951G show same results with ~380 Mbps

Funny thing is my RB951Ui shows ~470Mbps
 
User avatar
dgnevans
Member
Member
Posts: 463
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2013 11:24 am
Location: Zimbabwe
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Sat Feb 11, 2017 10:05 pm

1100ahx2 no firewall or queues 1050 mbps
ccr1009 with nat firewal mangle and queues 580 mbps
ccr1009 our the box with just fast track 1180 mbps
 
revellion
just joined
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 9:53 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri Feb 17, 2017 11:28 pm

Great service!.

Tested a 1gbit Bidi link using your BTest server.

984mbit RX/TX with IPv6 traffic :).

Close to maximum of the gig link for the event it's gonna host in a few weeks..
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Tue Feb 21, 2017 8:04 pm

Please use these public btest servers for brief periods of time.
When one person performs an extended 4-hour-long 400 meg btest, you are preventing everybody else from btesting at the same time because of Simple QOS rate-limiting settings.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:00 pm

I just upgraded my pubic btest server from 6.38.1 to 6.38.3
((( This is a virtual CHR hosted on a VMware ESXi physical server )))

My public btest server info:
TomjNorthIdaho btest server:
ipv4: 207.32.195.2
user and pass: btest
traffic graph of this btest server: http://207.32.195.2/graphs/iface/ether1/


Also - a second public btest server hosted by: planetcoop
planetcoop btest server:
Host: btest.planetcoop.com
ipv4: 50.235.23.218
ipv6: 2001:559:8062::20
user and pass: btest
traffic graph of this btest server: https://btest.planetcoop.com:10443/graphs/iface/ether1/


You are welcome and encouraged to post your btest throughput results - and please let us know where you are located:
Also; A Reputation +1 is always welcome.


Please - limit your btests to short periods of time. We are also using some of our bandwidth for our customers also.

Thank you

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
mikelindj
just joined
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2017 1:01 am

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Sun Mar 05, 2017 7:57 am

VM RouterOS 6.38.1 on a Singtel Fibre Optic line in Singapore.
I'm support to get 300mbps up and down.

This is pretty close.
Image


Although in another deployment where I've got 2m down 16m up, my users complain of 0.69mbps.
Any idea? Similar vm deployment.
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8319
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri Mar 10, 2017 12:59 pm

Using 207.32.195.2
I cant seem to get more than 300-800Kbps on TCP Download?

Are others having an issue like this ?
upto gigabit w/o any problem :)
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri Mar 10, 2017 6:20 pm

Using 207.32.195.2
I cant seem to get more than 300-800Kbps on TCP Download?

Are others having an issue like this ?
TCP and UDP are different types of Internet communications protocols.

UDP is a "Fire and Forget" protocol. The sending device will send a packet or packets and not wait for the intended remote receiver device to acknowledge that anything was received. Kinda like shooting a machine gun - it just sends.

TCP is a "Fire and wait for from the intended remote receiver device to return an acknowledgement (ACK) that a packet was received". After the ACK is received back by the original sending device, then the next TCP packet is sent - and the wait for answer routine begins again. Kinda like shooting a single bullet from a rifle and waiting for somebody to tell you that you hit the target before you shoot again.

UDP can be great for something like a movie stream where if something gets missed , then you just continue on sending the rest of the movie. Thus there is no real guarantee that what you sent was verified that it was received.

TCP can be great for something like pulling up a web page. The web server gets acknowledgement (ACKs) back from the workstation that the web page was properly received. Thus you get fewer communication mistakes.

Let's assume the following (below) are some data packets you want to send - which protocol would you want to use ?
- Packet 1 "Hello Robert , please "
- Packet 2 "don't "
- Packet 3 "call me on the phone"
If using UDP and "Packet 2" is dropped/lost, then the entire message could be understood as something totally different"
If using TCP, the entire communications session can be much slower because there is a wait time for everything.

Now in your scenario where "I cant seem to get more than 300-800Kbps on TCP Download" , the answer could be that you are many hops away (somewhere on the other side of the world), and waiting time for a round-trip answer takes an extended period of time. With UDP, there could be multiple packets going through the Internet that the sender sent and has not been received yet - because those multiple packets are still traveling through the Internet.

There are also some other possible causes of slow TCP traffic such as QOS, priority, network saturation, firewall behavior, symmetric or asymmetric paths through the Internet and others.

I hope I partially answered your question.
((( lol - if you absolutely need faster TCP bandwidth to 207.32.195.2, then mabey you need to move to North Idaho - lol )))

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
olkitu
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 51
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 7:04 pm

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri Mar 10, 2017 9:24 pm

Nice testing server!

CCR1072-1G-8S+ and 10Gbps Fiber link just we open from Finland. Maybe need get up also similar speedtest server here for testing :)

Image
Network Specialist

Need know where is cellular tower? Try CellMapper to get know where is cellular tower:
https://www.cellmapper.net/map
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Sat Mar 11, 2017 2:42 am

olkitu

Re: ...Maybe need get up also similar speedtest server here for testing...

So you thinking about setting up a public btest server ?
I suspect it would be very useful to all Mikrotik admins - especially near your part of the world.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
abanghasan
just joined
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 10:48 am
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Sun Mar 12, 2017 10:52 am

It is a good bandwith,,it is affordable?and share untul how much user
 
louisk
just joined
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 9:24 pm

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Sun Mar 12, 2017 9:28 pm

Hi there, I have been trying to test my CCR1009 connected to a 2Gbit fiber connection and I have tried both servers listed in this thread. I can consistently get 2GB's down (about 2.1-2.3 actually), but never really more than 1Gb up. Is there something I am doing wrong? I had the ISP come test, and they validated 2GB in each direction using their own tests so they claim the problem is in the CCR router.

Is there a way for me to reliably test 2GB in each direction? I am doing UDP testing.
 
olkitu
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 51
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 7:04 pm

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Tue Mar 14, 2017 10:30 am

olkitu

Re: ...Maybe need get up also similar speedtest server here for testing...

So you thinking about setting up a public btest server ?
I suspect it would be very useful to all Mikrotik admins - especially near your part of the world.

North Idaho Tom Jones
Yeah it's nice but let see when i have time to buy licence for 10G+ CHR and put that to VPS... We are ISP and Hosting Company so we have own peering what is 10G+ now. Also we are sell Mikrotik devices here Finland... Also need QOS rules because someone can use that make connection down... Also need server with 10G+ port, now mostly we have only 1G+...

This connection shared also to our customer also :)
Network Specialist

Need know where is cellular tower? Try CellMapper to get know where is cellular tower:
https://www.cellmapper.net/map
 
olkitu
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 51
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 7:04 pm

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Tue Mar 14, 2017 10:32 am

Hi there, I have been trying to test my CCR1009 connected to a 2Gbit fiber connection and I have tried both servers listed in this thread. I can consistently get 2GB's down (about 2.1-2.3 actually), but never really more than 1Gb up. Is there something I am doing wrong? I had the ISP come test, and they validated 2GB in each direction using their own tests so they claim the problem is in the CCR router.

Is there a way for me to reliably test 2GB in each direction? I am doing UDP testing.
I think on this free open servers have upload limits... Also where are u? So example here Finland cannot get 10G+ because too long line and too much peering... Thats why need also speedtest server here so can test :) - Both server is in US
Network Specialist

Need know where is cellular tower? Try CellMapper to get know where is cellular tower:
https://www.cellmapper.net/map
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Sat Mar 25, 2017 7:13 am

Hi there, I have been trying to test my CCR1009 connected to a 2Gbit fiber connection and I have tried both servers listed in this thread. I can consistently get 2GB's down (about 2.1-2.3 actually), but never really more than 1Gb up. Is there something I am doing wrong? I had the ISP come test, and they validated 2GB in each direction using their own tests so they claim the problem is in the CCR router.

Is there a way for me to reliably test 2GB in each direction? I am doing UDP testing.
Let me guess Comcast gigabit-pro? Either way where are you located and what kind of configuration do you have on the ccr? Like NAT or only layer-3? firewall rules or even regex operations?
 
Groov
just joined
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2017 12:27 am

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Apr 05, 2017 12:32 am

Ukraine Dnepr
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Apr 05, 2017 5:59 pm

3 Gig btest - wow, you definitely have high-speed Internet access.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
npmarshall
just joined
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 6:51 am

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Tue Apr 11, 2017 2:38 am

Nevada - performed with a CCR1036-8G-2S+. Thank you very much.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
kei888
newbie
Posts: 47
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 7:54 am

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Thu Apr 20, 2017 3:39 am

Thank you so much for this. :)

More power!

God bless!
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:45 am

O come on now ...

It's one thing to run a brief bandwidth test to the public btest server at 207.32.195.2
But it's another thing to run a sustained btest for hours or days non-stop.

Although I have the bandwidth, the simple queues on this btest server will drop down in throughput rates when you keep a sustained btest running. Thus if anybody else tries to btest to the same server, they will never be able to see their peak throughput (because you have the simple queue slowing down the btest server for the next person wanting to test.)

So with that, 216.218.22.xx and 94.142.173.xx , you are more than welcome to btest to 207.32.195.2 - however please make these btest tests brief so the next person can also btest at full speed.

Thank you

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri Apr 28, 2017 4:15 am

Yo , planetcoop

Thought I would ask ...

Are you up for a btest server to btest server test ? (my 207.32.195.2 btest server to your 50.235.23.218 btest server) ?

If you have the bandwidth and available resources ...
Sometime tomorrow morning, I would like to run a 4 hours long btest ( both directions - UDP - with up and down speeds set to 1250M ).

I would like to stress test and hold both directions slightly faster than 1-gig. This way I can verify we are on 10-gig routers and switches end to end and that my normal ISP client traffic does not take any slowdown hits during this hours long test.

I was thinking about starting sometime after 8 AM PST tomorrow Friday. But I will wait for your permission btest first.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri Apr 28, 2017 4:53 am

let it rip... :) You can try to PM me or email me if you want, i wouldn't mind an offline conversation.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri Apr 28, 2017 6:13 pm

let it rip... :) You can try to PM me or email me if you want, i wouldn't mind an offline conversation.
The btest is running now

Say - shoot me an email with your contact info - and I will call you

My email address is < tjones -at- cdatribe-nsn -dot- gov

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri Apr 28, 2017 7:15 pm

you should have an email from me and i have confirmed the test @ 1.35Gbps?
confirmed.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri Apr 28, 2017 10:04 pm

Previous testing
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri Apr 28, 2017 10:06 pm

Tom, today's test
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri Apr 28, 2017 10:41 pm

btest-4-hours.png
Here are the results of the 4-hour long Mikrotik btest test we just performed:

Public btest server 207.32.195.2 to public btest server 50.235.23.218

This 4-hour long extended btest through the Internet used the following settings:
Local Tx Speed 1250M (aka 1.25 Gig)
Remote Tx Speed 1250M (aka 1.25 Gig)

Amount of data transmitted was more than 2.7 TB -&- amount of data received was more than 2.7 TB

North Idaho Tom Jones
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:07 pm

FYI: public btest server was just software upgraded moments ago.
As of April 28th, 2017 1PM PST, the Mikrotik CHR-P10 is now running CHR-ROS version v6.39


by the way - - - If there are any other Mikrotik admins willing to run a public btest server , please post and let us know. If you do, we can offer some advice for how to limit the maximum btest bandwidth so that your networks continue running correctly during a btest session.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:31 pm

FYI: public btest server was just software upgraded moments ago.
As of April 28th, 2017 1PM PST, the Mikrotik CHR-P10 is now running CHR-ROS version v6.39


by the way - - - If there are any other Mikrotik admins willing to run a public btest server , please post and let us know. If you do, we can offer some advice for how to limit the maximum btest bandwidth so that your networks continue running correctly during a btest session.

North Idaho Tom Jones
I update my edge and btest at 5:30AM PST in preparation for today's btests. So far no issues. :)
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed May 03, 2017 5:24 pm

BUMPED to 6.39.1 current. :)
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed May 03, 2017 6:08 pm

BUMPED to 6.39.1 current. :)
 
wombat
newbie
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu May 14, 2015 10:12 pm

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri May 12, 2017 7:18 pm

Hi,

Why doesn't work only UDP receive direction? All the time only "0 bps" with Both or TCP no problem.
Image
 
Sob
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 4853
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:11 pm

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri May 12, 2017 7:36 pm

Firewall, most likely. UDP packets from BTest server look like unsolicited traffic.
People who quote full posts should be spanked with ethernet cable. Some exceptions for multi-topic threads may apply.
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri May 12, 2017 9:12 pm

I have posted some high speed feedback for new device considerations in the other post, just mentioning it here to also check out. viewtopic.php?f=2&t=121533
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri May 12, 2017 9:32 pm

Re: ... Firewall, most likely. UDP packets from BTest server look like unsolicited traffic. ...

I agree

The 207.32.195.2 btest server does not have any firewall rules.
The 207.32.195.2 btest server is not behind another firewall.
The 207.32.195.2 btest server is directly connected to the Internet.

If somebody is having problems with a TCP and/or UDP btest in either or both directions, then you may want to examine your firewall rules.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
wombat
newbie
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu May 14, 2015 10:12 pm

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri May 12, 2017 10:54 pm

Ok, i have default firewall. When i disable drop rule. So it works good. Have I bad firewall rules?
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri May 12, 2017 11:08 pm

no, typically you do not want the internet or random networks hitting the input chain. you would have to allow for this with a rule additional to default rules but you can also enable/disable rules based on testing or other requirements.

As Tom said in his previous post about the btest, mine is not as accessible due to ipv4 limitations i have. Mine is NAT4 behind an address on a ccr1036 and is also available on ipv6 directly routed through the ccr1036. In my own testing the NATipv4 configuration is not a limitation in testing and has a port range to support testing.
 
jarda
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 7604
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:46 pm

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri May 12, 2017 11:19 pm

Most probably it is better than nothing. Just add accepting rule for the traffic from the ip addresses you want to get packets from.
 
User avatar
k6ccc
Member
Member
Posts: 481
Joined: Fri May 13, 2016 12:01 am
Location: Glendora, CA, USA (near Los Angeles)

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Tue May 30, 2017 9:48 pm

First of all, thanks guys for offering these bandwidth tests.
I'm trying to set this up as a script with the output to a file which will then be E-Mailed to me. The idea being that once a day, the router will perform the test. If I see substantial changes in performance, I can investigate. For testing this, I am using the following commands:
[admin@RB750Gr3 #2] /tool> bandwidth-test 50.235.23.208 direction=both duration=15s random-data=yes user=btest password=btest

This produces a correct output after 15 seconds:
status: done testing
duration: 16s
tx-current: 12.1Mbps
tx-10-second-average: 12.1Mbps
tx-total-average: 11.8Mbps
rx-current: 121.2Mbps
rx-10-second-average: 95.4Mbps
rx-total-average: 68.8Mbps
lost-packets: 0
random-data: yes
direction: both
tx-size: 1500
rx-size: 1500

Then I change the command to:
[admin@RB750Gr3 #2] /tool> bandwidth-test 50.235.23.208 direction=both duration=15s random-data=yes user=btest password=btest file="BW_test.txt"

This produces the file BW_test.txt as expected, but not with the expected data. All I get in the output file is:
# may/30/2017 11:28:43 by RouterOS 6.39.1
# software id = [redacted]
#
status: connecting
duration: 0s
tx-current: 0bps
tx-10-second-average: 0bps
tx-total-average: 0bps
rx-current: 0bps
rx-10-second-average: 0bps
rx-total-average: 0bps
lost-packets: 0
random-data: yes
direction: both
tx-size: 1500
rx-size: 1500

I never get any results after connecting.

Any suggestions about what I'm missing???

BTW, this is from the Los Angeles area on my newly installed Spectrum cable based connection (massive improvement over my DSL!)

Thanks
RB750Gr3, RB750r2, CRS326-24G-2S (in SwitchOS), CSS326-24G-2S, CSS106-5G-1S, RB260GS
Not sure if I beat them in submission, or they beat me into submission


Jim
 
User avatar
k6ccc
Member
Member
Posts: 481
Joined: Fri May 13, 2016 12:01 am
Location: Glendora, CA, USA (near Los Angeles)

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Thu Jun 01, 2017 6:14 pm

BTW, ignore my typo of the IP address that I'm using for my testing. I really am using 50.235.23.218
RB750Gr3, RB750r2, CRS326-24G-2S (in SwitchOS), CSS326-24G-2S, CSS106-5G-1S, RB260GS
Not sure if I beat them in submission, or they beat me into submission


Jim
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Tue Jun 06, 2017 3:23 pm

I have updated my CHR btest 50.235.23.218 to 6.39.2: viewtopic.php?f=21&t=122322
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Tue Jun 06, 2017 10:22 pm

I have updated my CHR btest 207.32.195.2 to 6.39.2
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Tue Jun 06, 2017 10:29 pm

btest002.png
btest001.png
FYI - below is a cacti graph of my 207.32.195.2 btest server
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Tue Jun 06, 2017 11:44 pm

Anyone notice the pickup in testing between both servers and the sustained testing?
bleeding.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jun 07, 2017 1:43 am

Anyone notice the pickup in testing between both servers and the sustained testing?
bleeding.png
On the 207.32.195.2 btest server, I have been seeing some btest sessions that appear to not quit after a few minutes.
I have seen some btest sessions that will go 24 hours non-stop.

Hay everybody - please do not run sustained btest tests. These btest servers are intended for brief btest testing.
When one person holds a continued non-stop btest, then other Mikrotik admins can get skewed results to the same btest server.

Example - on my 207.32.195.2 btest server, I have a simple-queue that will auto drop the bandwidth after a minute or so to around 500 meg in both directions.
When somebody holds an extended btest test, the simple-queue kicks in. Then when a 2nd Mikrotik admin starts a btest, then both admins are sharing a 500 meg max throughput session.
I often see 5 btest tests at the same time - this means that when one person has triggered the simple-queue (because of a lengthy btest) , then all 5 Mikrotik admins can only get a slice to the 500 meg (due to simple-queue).
When nobody in btesting, the simple-queue clears itself and the first person to execute a btest test can actually hit 2-gig and faster for a minute-or-so until the simple-queue kicks in again.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jun 07, 2017 1:49 am

Re - the sustained btest Mikrotik tests

We know who the extended non-stop btest testers are. We just use our Winbox and go to Tools - BTest server - Sessions (there is your IP testing to our btest server)

Please play nice and fair for other btest testers and please do not hold extended non-stop btest tests.

If you have a special need, we can and are willing to set-up something special for temporary extended testing.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jun 07, 2017 1:56 am

Re - the sustained btest Mikrotik tests

Yo Mikrotk ROS programmers ... Is there a possibility of a newer ROS to have a new option in the btest server ?
[ ] Enabled
[ ] Authenticate
Allocate UDP Ports from: [ 2000 ]
Max Sessions: [ 100 ]
Timeout per btest session in seconds [ 300 ]
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jun 07, 2017 3:23 am

I really did not want to do this - but I had a customer trying to use the btest server
So I had to simple-queue a continuous non-stop btest from a remote location

138-117-109-222.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jun 07, 2017 4:17 am

Here is the raw filter i am thinking of. ID the user source address with a timer of 5 minutes and then block all traffic for 2 hours until the next time. :)
raw filters.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jun 07, 2017 4:19 am

I have enabled my rules. :)
raw filters tested.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by planetcoop on Wed Jun 07, 2017 4:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jun 07, 2017 4:21 am

Here is the raw filter i am thinking of. ID the user source address with a timer of 5 minutes and then block all traffic for 2 hours until the next time. :)
raw filters.png
Looks interesting :)

Does it block only the single IP address for 2 hours and allow everybody else to still test ?

I am gonna have to take a look at this !

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jun 07, 2017 4:25 am

yes, source ip addresses

/ip firewall raw
add action=accept chain=prerouting comment="testers accepted" src-address-list=tester
add action=drop chain=prerouting comment="previous testers drop" src-address-list=previous
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=tester address-list-timeout=5m chain=prerouting comment="add to tester" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=tcp
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=tester address-list-timeout=5m chain=prerouting comment="add to tester" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=udp
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=previous address-list-timeout=2h chain=prerouting comment="add to previous" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=tcp
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=previous address-list-timeout=2h chain=prerouting comment="add to previous" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=udp
raw filters results.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by planetcoop on Wed Jun 07, 2017 4:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jun 07, 2017 4:28 am

yes, sent you an email if you want to call


/ip firewall raw
add action=accept chain=prerouting comment="testers accepted" src-address-list=tester
add action=drop chain=prerouting comment="previous testers drop" src-address-list=previous
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=tester address-list-timeout=5m chain=prerouting comment="add to tester" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=tcp
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=tester address-list-timeout=5m chain=prerouting comment="add to tester" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=udp
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=previous address-list-timeout=2h chain=prerouting comment="add to previous" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=tcp
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=previous address-list-timeout=2h chain=prerouting comment="add to previous" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=udp
It's almost the end of my work day and I am getting tired...
Do you need to enter a specific IP address , or is it automatic ?
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jun 07, 2017 4:32 am

Post wars, its automagic and RAW is wirespeed
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jun 07, 2017 4:43 am

Post wars, its automagic and RAW is wirespeed
I am heading home
Tomorrow I will make a backup and give it a try.

With that - a note to all Mikrotik admins who btest to the 207.32.195.2 server , I am going to be testing the above changes tomorrow.
I will post a final config and then ask for user input on how well it is performing.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jun 07, 2017 6:35 am

Forum and friends. I have just banned any address related to AS14868 and any related AS as i was just hit with a massive wave of btests.
https://ipinfo.io/AS14868

This isnt a business btest server, but rather a CHR in my home. It is free to use and conduct random tests. Please do not use my personal network for business deployments or use without my expressed permission.
abuse.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jun 07, 2017 7:46 am

Well, this is getting fun. I have now blocked 176.0.0.0-201.0.0.0. Sorry for the inconvenience to the rest of my fellow testers.
 
User avatar
pukkita
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 2986
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:09 am
Location: Spain

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jun 07, 2017 11:05 am

Hello guys!

It's sad how some people spoils others good will and hard work :evil:

I helped another forum user to apply queues to bw-test.

Posting here as this is the most dense-packed thread on bw-test.
Simplicity is the Ultimate Sophistication - Da Vinci
Getting the most out of this forum
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jun 07, 2017 4:34 pm

Ok, my current IP ban list blocked from my network:
/ip firewall address-list
add address=176.0.0.0/4 list=blocklist
add address=192.0.0.0/5 list=blocklist
add address=200.0.0.0/7 list=blocklist
add address=77.xx.xxx.132 list=blocklist
add address=160.0.0.0/4 list=blocklist

/ip firewall raw
add action=accept chain=prerouting comment="allow lan" src-address=192.168.0.0/24
add action=drop chain=prerouting comment="testers to block" src-address-list=blocklist
add action=accept chain=prerouting comment="testers accepted" src-address-list=tracking
add action=accept chain=prerouting comment="testers accepted" disabled=yes src-address-list=tester
add action=drop chain=prerouting comment="previous testers drop" disabled=yes src-address-list=previous
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=tester address-list-timeout=5m chain=prerouting comment="add to tester" disabled=yes dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=tcp
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=tester address-list-timeout=5m chain=prerouting comment="add to tester" disabled=yes dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=udp
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=previous address-list-timeout=2h chain=prerouting comment="add to previous" disabled=yes dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=tcp
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=previous address-list-timeout=2h chain=prerouting comment="add to previous" disabled=yes dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=udp
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=tracking address-list-timeout=1d chain=prerouting comment="add to previous" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=tcp
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=tracking address-list-timeout=1d chain=prerouting comment="add to previous" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=udp

I will also be changing my btest rules. I will remove the 5 minute limitation and the every 2 hour rules. The past 8 hours have proved effective and my CHR has not been abused otherwise. Enjoy.
1f7zvoFbGoj9tn0U.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jun 07, 2017 6:26 pm

planetcoop

Is this all I need to do to try your settings ?

[admin@207-32-195-2-CHR-P10] > ip
[admin@207-32-195-2-CHR-P10] /ip> firewall
[admin@207-32-195-2-CHR-P10] /ip firewall> export
# jun/07/2017 08:15:57 by RouterOS 6.39.2
# software id =
#
[admin@207-32-195-2-CHR-P10] /ip firewall> raw
[admin@207-32-195-2-CHR-P10] /ip firewall raw> export
# jun/07/2017 08:16:29 by RouterOS 6.39.2
# software id =
#
[admin@207-32-195-2-CHR-P10] /ip firewall raw> ..
[admin@207-32-195-2-CHR-P10] /ip firewall> export
# jun/07/2017 08:16:34 by RouterOS 6.39.2
# software id =
#
[admin@207-32-195-2-CHR-P10] /ip firewall> /ip firewall raw
[admin@207-32-195-2-CHR-P10] /ip firewall raw> add action=accept chain=prerouting comment="testers accepted" src-address-list=tester
[admin@207-32-195-2-CHR-P10] /ip firewall raw> add action=drop chain=prerouting comment="previous testers drop" src-address-list=previous
[admin@207-32-195-2-CHR-P10] /ip firewall raw> add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=tester address-list-timeout=5m chain=prerouting comment="add to tester" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=tcp
[admin@207-32-195-2-CHR-P10] /ip firewall raw> add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=tester address-list-timeout=5m chain=prerouting comment="add to tester" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=udp
[admin@207-32-195-2-CHR-P10] /ip firewall raw> add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=previous address-list-timeout=2h chain=prerouting comment="add to previous" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=tcp
[admin@207-32-195-2-CHR-P10] /ip firewall raw> add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=previous address-list-timeout=2h chain=prerouting comment="add to previous" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=udp
[admin@207-32-195-2-CHR-P10] /ip firewall raw>

planetcoop - is this correct and should work ?
I am not experienced with ROS firewalls. For core, in-house, for business firewalls, I generally use PfSense instead or Cisco firewalls.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jun 07, 2017 6:58 pm

That should be it with several assumptions, 5 minute test window every 2 hours based on source ip. This will also include your address ranges. Also that tcp/udp 2000-2100 for the port range.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jun 07, 2017 7:07 pm

That should be it with several assumptions, 5 minute test window every 2 hours based on source ip. This will also include your address ranges. Also that tcp/udp 2000-2100 for the port range.
OK - some questions:
- What is needed for a allow this network at all times? Such as I want to allow all of my Class C networks at all times where they skip the firewall raw configs.
- Is there a way to see what IP address are temporarily in the 2-hour blocked window & when those IPs entered that state?
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jun 07, 2017 7:25 pm

/ip firewall address-list
add address=YOURNET/22 list=tester

/ip firewall raw
add action=accept chain=prerouting comment="allow lan" src-address=192.168.0.0/24
add action=drop chain=prerouting comment="testers to block" src-address-list=blocklist
add action=accept chain=prerouting comment="testers accepted" src-address-list=tracking
add action=accept chain=prerouting comment="testers accepted" disabled=yes src-address-list=tester
add action=drop chain=prerouting comment="previous testers drop" disabled=yes src-address-list=previous
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=tester address-list-timeout=5m chain=prerouting comment="add to tester" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=tcp
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=tester address-list-timeout=5m chain=prerouting comment="add to tester" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=udp
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=previous address-list-timeout=2h chain=prerouting comment="add to previous" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=tcp
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=previous address-list-timeout=2h chain=prerouting comment="add to previous" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=udp
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=tracking address-list-timeout=1d chain=prerouting comment="add to previous" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=tcp
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=tracking address-list-timeout=1d chain=prerouting comment="add to previous" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=udp
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jun 07, 2017 8:32 pm

1st - a special thanks to planetcoop for all of his help and assistance and participation in the public btest servers for all Mikrotik admins.

Below is my 207.32.195.2 best server configuration (as of today):

[admin@207-32-195-2-CHR-P10] > export
# jun/07/2017 10:09:19 by RouterOS 6.39.2
# software id =
#
/interface ethernet
set [ find default-name=ether1 ] loop-protect=off
/queue simple
add burst-limit=3600M/3600M burst-threshold=500M/500M burst-time=11m40s/11m40s max-limit=500M/500M name=3.6-Gig
/snmp community
((( My SNMP configuration settings )))
/user group
add name=btest policy=test,winbox,romon,tikapp,!local,!telnet,!ssh,!ftp,!reboot,!read,!write,!policy,!password,!web,!sniff,!sensitive,!api,!dude
/ip address
add address=207.32.195.2/30 interface=ether1 network=207.32.195.0
/ip dns
set servers= ((( My DNS servers )))
/ip firewall address-list
add address= ((( One of my networks ))) list=tester
add address= ((( One of my networks ))) list=tester
add address= ((( One of my networks ))) list=tester
add address= ((( One of my networks ))) list=tester
add address= ((( One of my networks ))) list=tester
add address= ((( One of my networks ))) list=tester
/ip firewall raw
add action=accept chain=prerouting comment="allow lan" src-address=192.168.0.0/24
add action=drop chain=prerouting comment="testers to block" src-address-list=blocklist
add action=accept chain=prerouting comment="testers accepted" src-address-list=tracking
add action=accept chain=prerouting comment="testers accepted" disabled=yes src-address-list=tester
add action=drop chain=prerouting comment="previous testers drop" disabled=yes src-address-list=previous
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=tester address-list-timeout=5m chain=prerouting comment="add to tester" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=tcp
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=tester address-list-timeout=5m chain=prerouting comment="add to tester" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=udp
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=previous address-list-timeout=2h chain=prerouting comment="add to previous" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=tcp
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=previous address-list-timeout=2h chain=prerouting comment="add to previous" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=udp
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=tracking address-list-timeout=1d chain=prerouting comment="add to previous" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=tcp
add action=add-src-to-address-list address-list=tracking address-list-timeout=1d chain=prerouting comment="add to previous" dst-port=2000-2100 protocol=udp
/ip route
add distance=1 gateway=207.32.195.1
/ip service
((( My NTP configuration setting )))
/snmp
((( My SNMP configuration settings )))
/system clock
set time-zone-autodetect=no time-zone-name=America/Los_Angeles
/system identity
set name=207-32-195-2-CHR-P10
/system ntp client
((( My NTP configuration settings )))
/tool graphing interface
add interface=ether1
/tool netwatch
add comment="btest server in Plummer at Red-Spectrum" host=207.32.195.2
[admin@207-32-195-2-CHR-P10] >

If any Mikrotik admins experience any new problems with my public 207.32.195.2 btest server, please let me know. Also, if it appears to be running normal and behaving as you have experienced in the recent past, again please let us know.

FYI - I will let some traffic pass for several hours then post a newer/updated bandwidth graph for this btest server.

Again - thanks to everybody who helps support everybody in this btest project :) Your comments and support help everybody :)

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jun 07, 2017 9:21 pm

planetcoop

Question for you
what are the two grayed out items (marked inside the red box) and what do they do if I enable them - should they be enabled ?

Thanks
North Idaho Tom Jones
question1.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Thu Jun 08, 2017 12:24 am

Sorry for the delay, but you should enable them. It enforces the 5 minute and 2 hour rules.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Thu Jun 08, 2017 4:44 am

info btest server 207.32.195.2

I have some new rules in place in the configuration to block and stop "robo-btest testing". Where a remote mikrotik is scripted to perform robo btests to 207.32.195.2
Also
Please limit your btest tests to 1 minute. Anything longer will auto place you in a block for a period of time.

Note: When we see robo automated btest tests to the public btest servers - and when we see non-stop-continouis btest tests to the public btest servers, we conclude the following:
- Somebody is abusing the public btest servers
-and/or-
- Somebody may be abusing their Internet ISP by creating sustained network loads on their ISP and all router paths to the public btest servers

Again - Everybody is welcome to manually test to the btest servers, however please limit the actual btest session to 1-minute or less - and please wait a minimum of 15 minutes before starting your next btest. Please remember, there are many many many other Mikrotik admins in many countries also using these btest servers.

Thank you

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Thu Jun 08, 2017 8:40 pm

Great news for the day, the DDOS was hitting "btest.planetcoop.com" has been blocked for the moment and the CHR up time is over 48 hours now. Additionally, this should allow for more beneficial test results. Please update us if you are having any issues with btest throughput.
 
Greg
just joined
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 11:59 pm
Location: Switzerland

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Sun Jun 11, 2017 12:06 am

First things first, thank you for making those servers available.

We got a solid performance from Geneva, Switzerland, Europe.
Image

The graph page at https://btest.planetcoop.com:10443/graphs/iface/ether1/ didn't seem to show the test however.
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Mon Jun 12, 2017 6:15 am

First things first, thank you for making those servers available.

We got a solid performance from Geneva, Switzerland, Europe.
Image

The graph page at https://btest.planetcoop.com:10443/graphs/iface/ether1/ didn't seem to show the test however.
Depending on the length of test the graph wont show it. I think the shortest interval is 5 minutes per average. You would have to run it for 5 or more minutes to start showing detail. If you would like you may run the test longer.
 
User avatar
JohnSmith75
just joined
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2017 2:14 pm
Location: USA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Mon Jun 12, 2017 2:24 pm

Thanks for the service Tom. Very useful one, in my opinion, it's great alternative to speedtest.
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Mon Jun 19, 2017 8:05 pm

Happy to report this week that i have not seen any issues without blocking select ip addresses and a 5 minute per hour rule. Please let me know if you have issue with "btest.planetcoop.com". Also as it has been said before, if you have a special use case for a longer test or other requirement, please PM or post here so that we can help test and support the Mikrotik community.
 
ajack46
newbie
Posts: 38
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 9:08 am

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Tue Jun 20, 2017 12:13 pm

Thanks for the service Tom. Very useful one, in my opinion, it's great alternative to speedtest.
Couldn't agree more, some good tool for speed test indeed.
 
aliclubb
just joined
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2017 12:29 pm
Location: Cambridge, UK

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Thu Jun 29, 2017 1:39 pm

Happy to report this week that i have not seen any issues without blocking select ip addresses and a 5 minute per hour rule. Please let me know if you have issue with "btest.planetcoop.com". Also as it has been said before, if you have a special use case for a longer test or other requirement, please PM or post here so that we can help test and support the Mikrotik community.
Can't seem to PM you, but would really like to discuss current list of blocked IPs, suspect I was a dipstick and left a btest running on a customers router by accident as a certain portion of our IPs seem to be unable to btest to btest.planetcoop.com now.
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri Jun 30, 2017 1:56 am

Happy to report this week that i have not seen any issues without blocking select ip addresses and a 5 minute per hour rule. Please let me know if you have issue with "btest.planetcoop.com". Also as it has been said before, if you have a special use case for a longer test or other requirement, please PM or post here so that we can help test and support the Mikrotik community.
Can't seem to PM you, but would really like to discuss current list of blocked IPs, suspect I was a dipstick and left a btest running on a customers router by accident as a certain portion of our IPs seem to be unable to btest to btest.planetcoop.com now.
I am currently using several rule sets to block ip addresses as discussed in this thread:
viewtopic.php?f=9&t=98804

Additionally i have the 5 minute btest rule per every hour as well. I have finally created one rule for a 5 minute test every 12 hours with an ending ip of .132. If this is your ip it is not a problem and i am willing to allow it to use the 5 minute out of the hour in my main rule set. At this point i am trying to understand the traffic patterns as you have seen my previous posts about abuse from Brazil-net AS network that are un-secure.

FYI, i am also not sure on the PM part of the forum.
 
User avatar
pukkita
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 2986
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 11:09 am
Location: Spain

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri Jun 30, 2017 11:07 am

PM is disabled.
Simplicity is the Ultimate Sophistication - Da Vinci
Getting the most out of this forum
 
aliclubb
just joined
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2017 12:29 pm
Location: Cambridge, UK

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Tue Jul 04, 2017 2:12 pm

Happy to report this week that i have not seen any issues without blocking select ip addresses and a 5 minute per hour rule. Please let me know if you have issue with "btest.planetcoop.com". Also as it has been said before, if you have a special use case for a longer test or other requirement, please PM or post here so that we can help test and support the Mikrotik community.
Can't seem to PM you, but would really like to discuss current list of blocked IPs, suspect I was a dipstick and left a btest running on a customers router by accident as a certain portion of our IPs seem to be unable to btest to btest.planetcoop.com now.
I am currently using several rule sets to block ip addresses as discussed in this thread:
viewtopic.php?f=9&t=98804

Additionally i have the 5 minute btest rule per every hour as well. I have finally created one rule for a 5 minute test every 12 hours with an ending ip of .132. If this is your ip it is not a problem and i am willing to allow it to use the 5 minute out of the hour in my main rule set. At this point i am trying to understand the traffic patterns as you have seen my previous posts about abuse from Brazil-net AS network that are un-secure.

FYI, i am also not sure on the PM part of the forum.
Ok, no that's not our IP. Would you be able to shoot me an email to ali@airbroadband.co.uk to discuss this further in private? I'm still having issues, and just looked at it further and there is some weird behaviour going on, potentially on your servers end?
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Tue Jul 04, 2017 11:45 pm

I have sent an email. If anyone else has an issue please post here. I am not trying to eliminate bandwidth usage but I am trying to keep my network from contributing to internet abuses. Thank you.
 
shaider
just joined
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 6:54 am
Location: Taytay, Philippines
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Thu Jul 20, 2017 5:56 pm

may i know if the btest server is still active or online? at first its working on my end then today. i cant get any results.
thank you for sharing your network ^^,v
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Thu Jul 20, 2017 6:12 pm

may i know if the btest server is still active or online? at first its working on my end then today. i cant get any results.
thank you for sharing your network ^^,v
My 207.32.195.2 btest server is working. (However I just rebooted it to make sure).

planetcoop and I ( TomJ North Idaho ) , both run public accessible Mikrotik CHR btest servers which are connected to the Internet using 10-gig interfaces.

We both made some changes somewhat recently which block/drop extended/lengthy/non-stop/frequently-repeating btests. We both have slightly different rules for the configuration.

My 207.32.195.2 btest test server (here in North Idaho) has the following:
- Max up/down speeds of about 3-gig btest
- I have a limit of about 2 minutes for a btest then the test auto terminates - then you will need to wait a few minutes before you can btest again.

I configured the rules on my 207.32.195.2 btest server because we were seeing extended/lengthy/non-stop btests and/or auto-repeating btests every minute of every hour of every day. This was preventing other btesters from getting good/clean btest results because the btest server bandwidth was shared between everybody testing at the same time - which made slower btest results for everybody testing at the same time.

I am pretty sure planetcoop has very similar reasons for his btest limits also.

Anyways - if you are testing to my North Idaho 207.32.195.2 btest server , try waiting 4 minutes , then run a btest for about 1 minute up , wait 4 minutes then run a btest for about 1 minute down - then optionally repeat a few times to make sure your btest results come out the same.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
shaider
just joined
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 6:54 am
Location: Taytay, Philippines
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:02 pm

i see. maybe thats the reason why i coudnt do any btest. but lately i did. i was able to do btest twice. and thats the limitation per day..
thank you for sharing your network. Image
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:50 pm

I have limited my btest CHR to a 5 minute window once per hour. once the server sees traffic or the session from you it will block you at the end of the five minutes and then allow the connection 60 minutes after first contact again. As Tom has described we have seen some lengthy testing. Please feel free to test as much as you want within that window to btest.planetcoop.com. If you need additional testing, please reach out as i can work with you to add you on a longer testing white list.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Sat Jul 22, 2017 1:02 am

I have limited my btest CHR to a 5 minute window once per hour. once the server sees traffic or the session from you it will block you at the end of the five minutes and then allow the connection 60 minutes after first contact again. As Tom has described we have seen some lengthy testing. Please feel free to test as much as you want within that window to btest.planetcoop.com. If you need additional testing, please reach out as i can work with you to add you on a longer testing white list.
planetcoop - a question re the "5 minute window once per hour" on your btest server

Will this work below (without your rules blocking for an hour) ?:
1 minute btest TCP send
1 minute btest TCP receive
1 minute btest UDP send
1 minute btest UDP receive

(or any combination of different btest(s) within an hour prior to adding up to 5-minutes within the hour)

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Mon Jul 24, 2017 3:31 pm

I have limited my btest CHR to a 5 minute window once per hour. once the server sees traffic or the session from you it will block you at the end of the five minutes and then allow the connection 60 minutes after first contact again. As Tom has described we have seen some lengthy testing. Please feel free to test as much as you want within that window to btest.planetcoop.com. If you need additional testing, please reach out as i can work with you to add you on a longer testing white list.
planetcoop - a question re the "5 minute window once per hour" on your btest server

Will this work below (without your rules blocking for an hour) ?:
1 minute btest TCP send
1 minute btest TCP receive
1 minute btest UDP send
1 minute btest UDP receive

(or any combination of different btest(s) within an hour prior to adding up to 5-minutes within the hour)

North Idaho Tom Jones
At the moment it is by ip address and the remote address starts the 5 minute timer. So for example your btest to my btest. The first packet starts the timer and you have 5 minutes to conduct any testing. After 5 minutes, the btest CHR blocks the address for the next 55 minutes. After that, the temporary blocked address is removed and valid to pursue any further tests with the same ongoing rules as above. It is harsh, but i have found that to be very effective and it dynamically weeds out abuse. I have also said i can whitelist any tester if they need additional testing as we have in the past tested beyond a 5 minute test. :)
 
gdo
just joined
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 12:30 am

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Jul 26, 2017 1:20 am

thank u
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Thu Jul 27, 2017 8:27 pm

Notice: I just upgraded my 207.32.195.2 public accessible Mikrotik CHR btest server to v6.40

If you experience any issues, please let me know

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
shaider
just joined
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 6:54 am
Location: Taytay, Philippines
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri Jul 28, 2017 2:56 am

Thank you TomjNorthIdaho for the btest server. we are now using it right now. and we added some script to make things easier.

:do {
:local MTUSRPHsource "https://s.mep.ph/btest/";
:local scriptName "btest.rsc";
:put "Downloading btest script...";
:do {
/tool fetch url="$MTUSRPHsource$scriptName" mode=https dst-path="/$scriptName";
} on-error={
:put "Error. Download failed";
}
:put "Importing update script...";
:do {
/import "$scriptName";
} on-error={
:put "import failed. unknown error.";
}
:put "Removing update script...";
:do {
/file remove "$scriptName";
} on-error={}
:put "Update Complete.";
}
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri Jul 28, 2017 8:25 pm

Notice: I just upgraded my 207.32.195.2 public accessible Mikrotik CHR btest server to v6.40

If you experience any issues, please let me know

North Idaho Tom Jones
Updated btest.planetcoop.com to 6.40 yesterday as well. Enjoy :)
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri Jul 28, 2017 8:26 pm

Thank you TomjNorthIdaho for the btest server. we are now using it right now. and we added some script to make things easier.

:do {
:local MTUSRPHsource "https://s.mep.ph/btest/";
:local scriptName "btest.rsc";
:put "Downloading btest script...";
:do {
/tool fetch url="$MTUSRPHsource$scriptName" mode=https dst-path="/$scriptName";
} on-error={
:put "Error. Download failed";
}
:put "Importing update script...";
:do {
/import "$scriptName";
} on-error={
:put "import failed. unknown error.";
}
:put "Removing update script...";
:do {
/file remove "$scriptName";
} on-error={}
:put "Update Complete.";
}
I have reviewed your script and i will give it a try, but please be careful, your gmail account details are in the script and un-encrypted.... You could pull the tool section and make it another script not publicly available.
 
shaider
just joined
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 6:54 am
Location: Taytay, Philippines
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Sat Jul 29, 2017 9:34 am

thank you planetcoop for the concern about the email on the rsc.. its ok to put it on public. we just use it here in Philippines for or as sending recipient on our routerboard..
once again thank you so much for the btest server. ^^,v
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:20 pm

FYI - I just upgraded the public accessible 207.32.195.2 btest server from v6.40 to v6.40.1
If you encounter any new/strange issues , please let me know.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
JKais
just joined
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 1:51 pm

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Fri Aug 18, 2017 2:43 pm

Hi,

I have been trying to do it from our office in Spain, but haven't been able to do it. Any suggestion?

Would be super appreciate it.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Aug 23, 2017 3:19 pm

Hi,

I have been trying to do it from our office in Spain, but haven't been able to do it. Any suggestion?

Would be super appreciate it.
Is it working now ?

Over the weekend, I had to turn-off the 207.32.195.2 btest server. I had a 10-gig fiber cut and my business fell back to a less-than-500-meg Microwave link. Everything was turned back on Tuesday morning.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
CZFan
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1455
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2016 8:25 pm
Location: South Africa, Randburg
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Aug 23, 2017 5:02 pm

Hi,

I have been trying to do it from our office in Spain, but haven't been able to do it. Any suggestion?

Would be super appreciate it.
Is it working now ?

Over the weekend, I had to turn-off the 207.32.195.2 btest server. I had a 10-gig fiber cut and my business fell back to a less-than-500-meg Microwave link. Everything was turned back on Tuesday morning.

North Idaho Tom Jones
Unfortunately does not seem to be working, I just tried and it ties to connect and then fails to connect
MTCNA, MTCTCE, MTCRE & MTCINE
 
User avatar
ionas
just joined
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 9:41 pm
Location: Nicosia
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Aug 23, 2017 7:30 pm

Thank you so much! It is so helpful!

Tested from Holland
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Aug 23, 2017 8:08 pm

Request - a little help please ...

I suspect my 10-Gig physical Internet connection (2-Gig burstable to 4-Gig), may not be achieving what I am paying for. It appears like I am only running on a 1-Gig Internet connection.
Thus, I suspect my 207.32.195.2 btest server may also not be performing at greater than 1-Gig btest speeds.

This is where I am asking for help.
Just now, I disabled all bandwidth limits and rules on my 207.32.195.2 btest server.
Please, will the Mikrotik admins with 1-Gig and faster Internet connections please perform a couple of btests to my 207.32.195.2 btest server and then please post their btest throughput results.

I will attempt to keep the 207.32.195.2 btest server open & un-limited for a few days - or until I begin to experience bandwidth load issues - or until I am able to confirm my upstream bandwidth problems.

Note - please limit your btest testing to a maximum of 1 to 2 minutes per test.

btest server: 207.32.195.2
User: btest
Password: btest
Thank you

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Sun Aug 27, 2017 10:32 pm

Request - a little help please ...

I suspect my 10-Gig physical Internet connection (2-Gig burstable to 4-Gig), may not be achieving what I am paying for. It appears like I am only running on a 1-Gig Internet connection.
Thus, I suspect my 207.32.195.2 btest server may also not be performing at greater than 1-Gig btest speeds.

This is where I am asking for help.
Just now, I disabled all bandwidth limits and rules on my 207.32.195.2 btest server.
Please, will the Mikrotik admins with 1-Gig and faster Internet connections please perform a couple of btests to my 207.32.195.2 btest server and then please post their btest throughput results.

I will attempt to keep the 207.32.195.2 btest server open & un-limited for a few days - or until I begin to experience bandwidth load issues - or until I am able to confirm my upstream bandwidth problems.

Note - please limit your btest testing to a maximum of 1 to 2 minutes per test.

btest server: 207.32.195.2
User: btest
Password: btest
Thank you

North Idaho Tom Jones
3.6/1.7gbps in separate tests.
down-and-up.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
rbobbitt
just joined
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:25 pm

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Aug 30, 2017 5:05 pm

Tom,

First: Thank you for the Outstanding service that you are providing to the Mikrotik community!

Now to my problem.

Do you have any IP's blocked at the firewall?
When I test through my 100x100 Spectrum Cable link all is well but when I test trough my 100x100 Windstream Cloud Firewall connection (via MPLS) I cannot connect.
My public IP on the Windstream service is in the 40.138.114.0 space.

Windstream says that they are made a policy that is "wide open" for my source address but I still cannot connect through them.

I've tried TCP, UDP, packet size 500 to 1500 etc.

Any ideas anyone?

Thanks,

Ray
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Aug 30, 2017 6:50 pm

Tom,

First: Thank you for the Outstanding service that you are providing to the Mikrotik community!

Now to my problem.

Do you have any IP's blocked at the firewall?
When I test through my 100x100 Spectrum Cable link all is well but when I test trough my 100x100 Windstream Cloud Firewall connection (via MPLS) I cannot connect.
My public IP on the Windstream service is in the 40.138.114.0 space.

Windstream says that they are made a policy that is "wide open" for my source address but I still cannot connect through them.

I've tried TCP, UDP, packet size 500 to 1500 etc.

Any ideas anyone?

Thanks,

Ray
Thank you for your nice reply :)

My 207.32.195.2 btest server does not have any firewalls - except for the following:
There is a rule that after a couple minutes of testing, it will auto block your IP address for about an hour. Then after the hour has elapsed, the IP address will be released.

What IP address are you testing from?
If you are able to reply promptly, I can then drop all rules , then post for you to try it. Then later re-enable my btest usage rules.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:37 pm

Please -

Please , do not robo auto-btest

I see at least one auto/robo/automated btest every-20-minutes

I can understand why you would want something like this, but a robo automated btest to my 207.32.195.2 best server is not what I intended it for (especially one I see running every 20 minutes) . Also, if it auto btests during any other manual btest at the same time, the results can be incorrect because of the shared bandwidth while the two btest(s) were running at the same time.

I might be able to work with an automated 1-time-a-day after midnight my time robo btest , but I would want to know and set the schedule.

Currently, the intent is supposed to be for all mikrotik admins performing brief manual btests at any time of the day.

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Sat Sep 09, 2017 2:37 am

Please ...

No robo automated btest clients to the 207.32.195.2 btest server !!!!
I see at least 4 robo btest servers auto testing to the 207.32.195.2 btest server.

I want to be a nice guy
I don't want to have to place your robo test IP address into a full blocked access to my network or my 207.32.195.2 btest server
If I have to block it, I will also publish the IP address of your robo btest IP address - and who you are.

This server is intended to be used by a physical person who is manually testing bandwidth. It is not for robo btest devices to auto-check the performance of your network every few minutes or hours or days. Please - manual btest performed by a human only.

If you need a full-time dedicated btest server for your robo test device to test to 24x7, then lets talk about a co-location server that you pay for instead of me.

Please - lets play nice :)

North Idaho Tom Jones

EDIT: Do I really need to block the following ?:
109117138222.ip73.static.mediacommerce.com.co [138.117.109.222]
inetnum: 138.117.108/22
status: allocated
aut-num: N/A
owner: Media Commerce Partners S.A
ownerid: CO-CUOC1-LACNIC
responsible: Víctor Fabián Serna Villa

EDIT: 138.117.109.222 You are now blocked.
Last edited by TomjNorthIdaho on Sat Sep 09, 2017 6:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:05 am

I am sorry to say, i have already blocked 138.0.0.0/8 due to massive ip flooding of my btest.planetcoop.com CHR... Thanks for playing 138. I have also seen special traffic from 0.0.0.0 so i have blocked it obviously as forged traffic. I have started long term btest ip address logging and review ip address counts daily.

Sadly my block list is very long:
0.0.0.0
46.163.178.0/24
46.163.179.0/24
46.163.188.0/24
138.0.0.0/8
160.0.0.0/4
176.0.0.0/4
192.0.0.0/5
200.0.0.0/7
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Sun Sep 10, 2017 4:43 pm

TomjNorthIdaho"]
Please ...No robo automated btest clients to the 207.32.195.2 btest server !!!!


2017-09-09 138.117.109.222 - You are now blocked ( banned because of continued automated non-stop robo btesting )

2017-09-10 185.34.121.32 - You are now blocked ( banned because of continued automated non-stop robo btesting )
 
User avatar
BrianHiggins
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 598
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 6:07 am
Location: Norwalk, CT
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:21 pm

Months ago I embedded a 10 second duration upload and download test into our web provisioning platform to assist with determining bandwidth performance when doing new installations (this generates at most less than 5 or 10 minutes of collective tests spread over the course of a month, so definitely not abuse levels!), and noticed today that the planetcoop test server (50.235.23.218) isn't accepting any connections, and when I manually tried the 207.32.195.2 server, it blocked me after about 2 minutes from running the first download test, before I could conduct a upload test.

Would an update on the current status and details on the rules you are both applying be possible? Really appreciate having the tools available, but need to know the limits and availability on using it.
-Brian

http://www.aditumims.com
Complete web based ISP in-a-box solution, designed specifically for Multi-Tenant properties, works great for WISPs too.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:50 pm

Months ago I embedded a 10 second duration upload and download test into our web provisioning platform to assist with determining bandwidth performance when doing new installations (this generates at most less than 5 or 10 minutes of collective tests spread over the course of a month, so definitely not abuse levels!), and noticed today that the planetcoop test server (50.235.23.218) isn't accepting any connections, and when I manually tried the 207.32.195.2 server, it blocked me after about 2 minutes from running the first download test, before I could conduct a upload test.

Would an update on the current status and details on the rules you are both applying be possible? Really appreciate having the tools available, but need to know the limits and availability on using it.
I would guess that planetcoop and myself are willing to consider almost anything that benefits all Mikrotik admins, providing the item being considered does not have a negative effect on the btest servers.

However, prior to considering other options, please note - at this time :
- planetcoop and myself are wanting to avoid the use of automated robo client btest servers.
- planetcoop and myself are saying that the use of manual human-at-the-controls-in-real-time client btest are permitted.

One possibly important item I discovered recently that needs some research to be verified is the following:

- Last week I wrote up my own in-house robo-client btest application which would sequence one-at-a-time through several hundred of my Mikrotik clients and have them perform robo-btest(s) to my 207.32.195.2 btest server. I was using a Linux server with a telnet/ssh expect script to Mikrotik clients using the CLI which would login into each client Mikrotik and have them perform UDP download speed tests.
- What I discovered (possibly a bug), is that after the time allocated in the btest command, and after the Linux telnet/ssh expect script /quit the connection, the 207.32.195.2 btest server would sometimes still continue the UDP btest send to the client Mikrotik (even after the client btest time allocated had expired and the remote login had logged-out). The result was a continued btest that would not-stop and would continue running indefinitely. When sequencing one-at-a-time through about 50 client Mikrotiks, I could end up with 3 to 10 btest that would continue running non-stop long after the expect script to the client had timed-out the btest, waited a minute then logged out.
- The logs on the remote client Mikrotik used to initiate the btest session did show the login and the logout - however - after the logout and the log showing the logout, the btest still continued to run.
- I suspect this may be a bug

For this reason (and my past statements in this forum) , I am asking the Mikrotik admin community to please not use robo-automated-btest sessions to the btest servers.
When a human is at the controls, this condition is easily identifiable and correctable. If this happens with a robo-automated-btest client to a btest server, the effects can possibly saturate networks and make the results of other Mikrotik admins performing a btest to the same server give skewed bandwidth results (and also have a lasting effect on my network until each problem client is rebooted or the btest server is rebooted).
I suspect I may off seen this many times with multiple long-time-btest sessings that appeared to never stop. If I remember correctly, (prior to some additional rules), I had seen some btest sessions running non-stop for several days.

Thank you

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
User avatar
BrianHiggins
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 598
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 6:07 am
Location: Norwalk, CT
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Sep 13, 2017 12:14 am

Just to be clear, my implementation is done only upon one of our admins clicking the test bandwidth button inside the web admin console they use to manage their hardware, and it's hard coded to run only a single 10 second test up, followed by a single 10 second test down, it then disables the test button once it's been ran once. They would have to exit and re-enter that configuration screen to be able to run it a 2nd time. so while it's automated in the sense that it is launched programmatically through the hardware, it is initiated and requested by an admin.

Before test is ran:
before testing.PNG
After test is ran:
After test.PNG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-Brian

http://www.aditumims.com
Complete web based ISP in-a-box solution, designed specifically for Multi-Tenant properties, works great for WISPs too.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: Public-Mikrotik-Bandwidth-Test-Server(s)

Wed Sep 13, 2017 1:03 am

Just to be clear, my implementation is done only upon one of our admins clicking the test bandwidth button inside the web admin console they use to manage their hardware, and it's hard coded to run only a single 10 second test up, followed by a single 10 second test down, it then disables the test button once it's been ran once. They would have to exit and re-enter that configuration screen to be able to run it a 2nd time. so while it's automated in the sense that it is launched programmatically through the hardware, it is initiated and requested by an admin.

Before test is ran:
before testing.PNG

After test is ran:
After test.PNG
So much to think about. My brain hurts - lol

My robo-testing to my 207.32.195.2 btest server was initiated from a remote Linux computer. What I discovered is that when using any "duration=" value on even a single client Mikrotik would sometimes start the non-stop continuous btest.

I tried and tested a few hundred variants of the line below many times to a single Mikrotik and to many Mikrotiks (in a sequence one-after-another) and I was able to randomly repeat the problem.
/tool bandwidth-test 207.32.195.2 duration=15 protocol=udp direction=receive without-paging interval=00:00:05 remote-tx-speed=27500000

This was in a my Linux sh script as shown below ( sh ./Script-Name.sh a.b.c.d )
#
host=$1
#
echo > logfile.txt
#
/usr/bin/expect <<EOF | tee TEMP-FILE-Results.txt > ./Results-Directory/$1
spawn telnet $host
expect "Login"
send "admin+c132we\r"
expect "Password"
#
send "ClientMtikPassword\r"
expect "command"
expect ">"
#sleep 1
send "..\r"
#sleep 1
send "..\r"
#sleep 1
send "..\r"
expect ">"
send "/tool bandwidth-test 207.32.195.2 duration=15 protocol=udp direction=receive without-paging interval=00:00:05 remote-tx-speed=27500000\r"
--- Note - login & password not shown in above line ---
sleep 60
expect ">"
#
send "/quit\r"
expect eof


I tested hundreds of variants of this script and discovered that at random, the btest session would not terminate and would even continue after the telnet/ssh script has logged out of the client Mikrotik.
The random problem may of appeared to happen more often on weaker/worse/more-distant client Mikrotiks.

Until I get an understanding of what is happening, I do ask to please not use any script initiated btest sessions.

Thank you

North Idaho Tom Jones

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 131 guests