Then why do you post to the forum?I do not need your advice , I need an official response , when there will be the realization of a normal iptv
And do you think it is somehow our fault, and we have to hear about your issues every day?I will write about this problem EVERY DAY until you decide to choose.
I'm tired of these network problems.
And this makes it OK to threat us with post flooding? Please think again.if reading my posts , you would see that the support staff does not respond to them
there are exceptions in all of rules, therefore I ask to do an exception and name exemplary terms thoughIn these cases is official answer always the same: when it will be then it will be. If you are not willing to wait, obtain devices of other manufacturers that are you sure will provide whole set of features you need.
OK, if you do not need it , give me the settings for normal operation iptvAs It was determined in other topics you created, you don't even need feature you are requesting. IGMP snooping is for switches, but you are trying to route Multicast streams over your router, in this case IGMP-proxy should be used which RouterOS already supports.
As far as I remember information already was provided and you already started to use it?
Here are the configuration example again
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Ro ... y#Examples
It surely goes to all ports, since you have one master port and the other slaves.the flow goes on all ports , the CPU load is increased to 80 , the router crashes , filtering does not help
ok, thank you, describe please more detailed as it to do, it is possible the personal reportIt surely goes to all ports, since you have one master port and the other slaves.the flow goes on all ports , the CPU load is increased to 80 , the router crashes , filtering does not help
Filtering does not work on slave ports, only on masters, so your filter rules do not work as expected.
If you really want filters, get all ports out of the switch, use them individually, put them in a bridge and filter at bridge level.
This is the only solution for the moment. But you will be limited by your CPU and the fact that there is a bottleneck between switch and CPU.
Alternatively, you could put your console on a separate subnet/interface if it is directly connected to the router.
once againWhen you disable switch configuration and add all slave ports to the bridge, then igmp-proxy should send multicast streams only on those bridge ports where client, that joined the multicast group, is connected. So bridge filters are not needed.
if is a question not quite clear you, why you write an answer??If you filter multicast on port 3,4 then of course it will not go to clients connected to those ports. It's not exactly clear what you want to set up and why you need those filters.
ok, thank you, describe please more detailed as it to do, it is possible the personal report
if will I filter multicastes for example on 3, 4 port, and there will be 20 clients on wi fi, all 20 a stream will go again??
Maybe the question is poorly asked ? Docmarius has clearly explained why in his opinion your filters for eth3 and eth4 do not work.if is a question not quite clear you, why you write an answer??
read a post # 32... we need to live with that fact ...
Do not scare us ... I do understand Russianп.с.
может банить менять хоть милион раз, я все равно найду способ сюда зайти, прокси никто не отменял
1. If you do not have an answer on the question , save yourself from writing messages PLEASE)))))))A. Please .... focus on your own problem and do not start stupid flame war without reason.
B. PLEASE DO NOT call me "клоун" in public. There is no reason to do that.
C. Please do not use Russian ... it is forum in English language.
kemerovo, Mrz is trying to help you.If you filter multicast on port 3,4 then of course it will not go to clients connected to those ports. It's not exactly clear what you want to set up and why you need those filters.
If you read my one of the previous posts it states that when switch config is removed and slave ports are added as bridge ports then igmp proxy will do the same as igmp snooping - only ports where clients, that joined multicast group, will receive the stream.if is a question not quite clear you, why you write an answer??If you filter multicast on port 3,4 then of course it will not go to clients connected to those ports. It's not exactly clear what you want to set up and why you need those filters.
and a problem is in that is needed that multicastes clients got only starting pleer, but not all in succession clients which are limited the use of one interface
example - 3 port is connected to 10 computers via a switch, 10 is connected via Wi Fi, and other interfaces are not involved. multicast needs on two computers which are connected to 3 port and one is connected via Wi Fi.question-multicast will receive 1 compuetr for Wi Fi and all 3 port or something different?If you read my one of the previous posts it states that when switch config is removed and slave ports are added as bridge ports then igmp proxy will do the same as igmp snooping - only ports where clients, that joined multicast group, will receive the stream.
I understood your opinion for the first time yet. And I mostly agree with you. But anyway shouldn't we take this topic out of this thread and create a separate discussion about the crime and punishment?Jarda. Have you translated this comment to "not gently" version ? Aren't you impressed that it has taken him 1.5h to write such comment ? Do you say "hello cosmic idiots" to welcome all when you go to the meeting ?
I have not decided to be a prison cook .... yet
How to add bridge ports?it is possible to send a screenshot?Remove switch configuration
/interface ethernet set [find] master-port=none
And then add each ethernet to bridge ports (except WAN port of course).
did your settings, nothing has changedHow to add bridge ports?
You can find an example in the manual
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:In ... #Example_2
e-mail I wrote many times, you do not answerThis is user experience forum. It is not clear whether you have misconfigured your device or whether there is real problem. If you do not publish your full config, we cannot help you. If you insist on error and you are able to proove it, you need to communicate with support via e-mail.
I not against to wait, I perfectly understand that it is very difficult to add one or another function to the device, but the first request of users was 5 years back and it is not yet known how many will decide, I am ready to wait name exemplary termsI do not have to answer. I have no relation to mikrotik support, I am the same poor user like you. My experience with support is quite good, they are trying to answer within a week or so. Be patient, you will get an answer sooner or later.
I without your advices will understand that to doYou need to understand, that you can be asking for something for 10 years and mikrotik will not do what you want. It is their decision what to implement and what not, and if so, when it will be. Everything cost resources and they decide to do only those things that they believe will bring more money back. If you want to force them whatever more above it, you need to buy mikrotikls company to be able to give them an order they must fulfil.