Community discussions

 
soomanyquestions
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 6:35 pm

NETCONF / YANG

Sun Oct 09, 2016 7:31 pm

Is there any plans to support configuration and management via NETCONF? This would allow mikrotik devices to be used in some sorts of SDN scenarios which I think would be beneficial to mikrotik.
 
User avatar
nz_monkey
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1821
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:53 pm
Location: Straya
Contact:

Re: NETCONF / YANG

Sun Oct 09, 2016 11:14 pm

There is no support for NETCONF on RouterOS.

But... There is a nice and usable API that will allow you to do just as much as with NETCONF.

See http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:API
http://thebrotherswisp.com/ | Mikrotik MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCINE | Fortinet FTCNA, FCNSP, FCT | Extreme Networks ENA
 
soomanyquestions
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 6:35 pm

Re: NETCONF / YANG

Mon Oct 10, 2016 1:30 am

There is no support for NETCONF on RouterOS.

But... There is a nice and usable API that will allow you to do just as much as with NETCONF.

See http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:API

Thats cool and all but it that isnt standards based... I cant input YANG models into that
 
User avatar
nz_monkey
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1821
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:53 pm
Location: Straya
Contact:

Re: NETCONF / YANG

Mon Oct 10, 2016 2:09 pm

I agree, Netconf/YANG is becoming the defacto standard.

Email support@mikrotik.com and see what they have to say.
http://thebrotherswisp.com/ | Mikrotik MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCINE | Fortinet FTCNA, FCNSP, FCT | Extreme Networks ENA
 
User avatar
Splash
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2015 10:09 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa

Re: NETCONF / YANG

Tue Oct 18, 2016 5:57 pm

Did Mikrotik respond as I am also interested in NETCONF being supported. Would make systems more standardised.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6241
MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCINE, MTCTCE, MTCIPv6E, MTCUME
 
brotherdust
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:31 am

Re: NETCONF / YANG

Sat Apr 15, 2017 10:20 pm

Totally agree on this one. The quickest way they could do this would be to leverage the free version of Tail-f (now Cisco's) ConfD. Yes, I know it's Cisco; but the work is already done here and it's got a very permissive license. It would make sense to wrap this up into an NPK for RouterOS and call it good. Thoughts?


https://developer.cisco.com/site/confD/
 
netwpl
newbie
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:09 pm

Re: NETCONF / YANG

Tue Mar 13, 2018 6:20 pm

Totally agree on this one. The quickest way they could do this would be to leverage the free version of Tail-f (now Cisco's) ConfD. Yes, I know it's Cisco; but the work is already done here and it's got a very permissive license. It would make sense to wrap this up into an NPK for RouterOS and call it good. Thoughts?


https://developer.cisco.com/site/confD/
++++++
 
MagnAxiom
just joined
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:08 pm

Re: NETCONF / YANG

Wed Jul 31, 2019 3:30 pm

I hate when good ideas like this just get crickets for response.
 
akant
just joined
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:29 am

Re: NETCONF / YANG

Tue Sep 24, 2019 6:15 am

+++ 1. Is this around yet?
 
muetzekoeln
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 145
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2018 2:34 pm

Re: NETCONF / YANG

Tue Sep 24, 2019 9:39 am

+++ 1. Is this around yet?
No. Maybe you can add it to a wishlist for ROS 8 features :(

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 123 guests