Community discussions

MikroTik App
  4. RouterOS
  5. General

NETCONF / YANG

Post Reply
 
soomanyquestions
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 35
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 6:35 pm

NETCONF / YANG

Sun Oct 09, 2016 7:31 pm

Is there any plans to support configuration and management via NETCONF? This would allow mikrotik devices to be used in some sorts of SDN scenarios which I think would be beneficial to mikrotik.
Top
 
User avatar
nz_monkey
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2103
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:53 pm
Location: Over the Rainbow
Contact:
Contact nz_monkey

Re: NETCONF / YANG

Sun Oct 09, 2016 11:14 pm

There is no support for NETCONF on RouterOS.

But... There is a nice and usable API that will allow you to do just as much as with NETCONF.

See http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:API
Top
 
soomanyquestions
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 35
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 6:35 pm

Re: NETCONF / YANG

Mon Oct 10, 2016 1:30 am

There is no support for NETCONF on RouterOS.

But... There is a nice and usable API that will allow you to do just as much as with NETCONF.

See http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:API

Thats cool and all but it that isnt standards based... I cant input YANG models into that
Top
 
User avatar
nz_monkey
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2103
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:53 pm
Location: Over the Rainbow
Contact:
Contact nz_monkey

Re: NETCONF / YANG

Mon Oct 10, 2016 2:09 pm

I agree, Netconf/YANG is becoming the defacto standard.

Email support@mikrotik.com and see what they have to say.
Top
 
User avatar
Splash
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 206
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2015 10:09 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa

Re: NETCONF / YANG

Tue Oct 18, 2016 5:57 pm

Did Mikrotik respond as I am also interested in NETCONF being supported. Would make systems more standardised.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6241
Top
 
brotherdust
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 130
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:31 am

Re: NETCONF / YANG

Sat Apr 15, 2017 10:20 pm

Totally agree on this one. The quickest way they could do this would be to leverage the free version of Tail-f (now Cisco's) ConfD. Yes, I know it's Cisco; but the work is already done here and it's got a very permissive license. It would make sense to wrap this up into an NPK for RouterOS and call it good. Thoughts?


https://developer.cisco.com/site/confD/
Top
 
netwpl
newbie
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:09 pm

Re: NETCONF / YANG

Tue Mar 13, 2018 6:20 pm

Totally agree on this one. The quickest way they could do this would be to leverage the free version of Tail-f (now Cisco's) ConfD. Yes, I know it's Cisco; but the work is already done here and it's got a very permissive license. It would make sense to wrap this up into an NPK for RouterOS and call it good. Thoughts?


https://developer.cisco.com/site/confD/
++++++
Top
 
MagnAxiom
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:08 pm

Re: NETCONF / YANG

Wed Jul 31, 2019 3:30 pm

I hate when good ideas like this just get crickets for response.
Top
 
akant
just joined
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:29 am

Re: NETCONF / YANG

Tue Sep 24, 2019 6:15 am

+++ 1. Is this around yet?
Top
 
muetzekoeln
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 167
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2018 2:34 pm

Re: NETCONF / YANG

Tue Sep 24, 2019 9:39 am

+++ 1. Is this around yet?
No. Maybe you can add it to a wishlist for ROS 8 features :(
Top
 
User avatar
stevenjacobs
just joined
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2015 5:14 pm
Contact:
Contact stevenjacobs

Re: NETCONF / YANG

Sun Nov 13, 2022 6:49 am

+1
Netconf and data models would make automation on MikroTik devices so much easier, with less room for mistakes.
Top
 
Beone
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 250
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 1:11 pm

Re: NETCONF / YANG

Mon Jun 12, 2023 1:03 pm

Seeing the huge change to DevOps & NetOps

Feature support request: SUP-118950
Top
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: anav, GoogleOther [Bot] and 96 guests
  4. RouterOS
  5. General