janisk, apparently you misunderstood phentry's question. He was not asking for WMM support; I'm sure he knows it is already implemented in 3.0beta7.WMM is already implemented in RouterOS and is available in 3.0beta7
I read that article a while back but it does not answer the question. Do you understand my question or should I rephrase? Interesting that Nathan understands what I'm questioningphendry,NathanA I'm not sure you have read this article, but probably it would help for WMM basics,
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/WMM
Actually, to me from reading that article it does indeed sound like "the higher the priority number, the sooner it will be serviced" is a safe assumption to make.I read that article a while back but it does not answer the question. Do you understand my question or should I rephrase?
In my experience I've found it best not to assume. Although the last centence in the wiki page says "WMM traffic over wireless link will discriminate regular traffic in the air" it doesn't say if "all" priority 6,7 packets will be serviced and only when there are none will priority 4,5 be serviced.Actually, to me from reading that article it does indeed sound like "the higher the priority number, the sooner it will be serviced" is a safe assumption to make.
Will WMM still work on an AP that has both WMM enabled and none WMM enabled clients? Obviously the none WMM clients won't get prioritised but will traffic to the WMM enabled clients still get prioritised?Priority 6,7 will be proccessed firstly for outgoing packets, only if you will have WMM enabled link.
Uldis, do all clients on the AP need to support WMM for it to be active on the ap? Also, if WMM and Nstreme are being run on the same PTM are there any conflicts with both protocols trying to control the traffic or do they enhance each other?
Answers received http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 737#p90737Uldis, do all clients on the AP need to support WMM for it to be active on the ap? Also, if WMM and Nstreme are being run on the same PTM are there any conflicts with both protocols trying to control the traffic or do they enhance each other?
As a reader with high interest in this treath I'm dissapointed that the thread 'bleeds' dead and some of the raised questions aren't answered yet.
Does this mean we readers have to start trying and test to find out ourselves?
Is the answer to your last question found or did you just forget about the issue...