Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
dadaniel
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 220
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 11:51 pm

CRS default config: Bridge and Interface MAC in IP Neighbors

Tue Sep 24, 2019 4:38 pm

I have several CRS connected with 10G fiber using the default config.
Now every switch is listed twice in IP neighbors: one time with interface MAC and switch model and the second line is the bridge MAC without any additional information and 0 uptime.

Is this a bug or is there a way to hide those entries?
bridge.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
xvo
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1237
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2018 1:12 am
Location: Moscow, Russia

Re: CRS default config: Bridge and Interface MAC in IP Neighbors

Tue Sep 24, 2019 5:08 pm

I think that's because you run neighbour discovery on "all" interface list.
Create a list containing only the bridge (or only physical interfaces).
Then open "discovery settings" and choose that list.
 
User avatar
Joni
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 156
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 2:46 pm
Contact:

Re: CRS default config: Bridge and Interface MAC in IP Neighbors

Sat Feb 22, 2020 11:07 am

Same issue, suggested solution doesn't help. Hardware CRS109, CRS125, RB960PGS.
The lists duplicate items always contain the bridge mac address without proper details and the discovery interface mac address with proper details. (just like in the original op post)

All running long-term current
[admin] > /system routerboard print   
       routerboard: yes
             model: CRS125-24G-1S-2HnD
     serial-number: x
     firmware-type: ar9344
  factory-firmware: 3.41
  current-firmware: 6.45.8
  upgrade-firmware: 6.45.8
 
User avatar
macsrwe
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1007
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 5:43 am
Location: Arizona, USA
Contact:

Re: CRS default config: Bridge and Interface MAC in IP Neighbors

Thu Mar 05, 2020 6:58 am

There are other threads about this same issue. It was introduced in an upgrade version within the past six months or so. It's pretty clearly a bug.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 4l4R1, Mr47, pellerb, pfturner, Thechriss and 110 guests