If I understand correctly, most of those devices listed on the link have similar range/coverage and same or similar antenna gain, so there is little difference in coverage area between the models. Which models would you recommend for this scenario? We are looking for one cheaper base model that customers get for free, and one advanced option that they can pay the price difference for if they want.
Also, I'm working on creating best standardized config for this scenario. Currently I have the following config defined. Not sure about including the fasttrack, since I have never used it, so I would really appreciate if someone could help me with expanding the config in best possible way.
Code: Select all
/interface bridge add name=bridge /interface bridge port add bridge=bridge interface=all /ip address add address=192.168.1.2/24 interface=bridge network=192.168.1.0 /ip dns set servers=X.X.X.X,X.X.X.X /ip route add distance=1 gateway=192.168.1.1 /interface wireless set [ find default-name=wlan1 ] antenna-gain=2 band=2ghz-g/n channel-width=20/40mhz-Ce country=croatia disabled=no distance=indoors frequency=auto frequency-mode=regulatory-domain installation=indoor mode=ap-bridge ssid=XXXXXX wireless-protocol=802.11 wps-mode=disabled security-profile=default /interface wireless security-profiles set [ find default=yes ] authentication-types=wpa-psk,wpa2-psk mode=dynamic-keys wpa-pre-shared-key=XXXXXX wpa2-pre-shared-key=XXXXXX /snmp set contact=XXXXXX@XXXX.XX location=XXXXXX enabled=yes /tool graphing interface add /tool graphing queue add /tool graphing resource add /system package update set channel=long-term /system clock set time-zone-name=Europe/Zagreb /system ntp client set primary-ntp=X.X.X.X secondary-ntp=X.X.X.X enabled=yes /user set [ find name=admin ] password=XXXXXX
We will use autoconfiguration system (either TR-069 or custom solution, still evaluating pros and cons) for mass config and software updates.