Community discussions

MUM Europe 2020
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24317
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

v5rc10 released

Thu Feb 17, 2011 3:04 pm


What's new in 5.0rc10 (2011-Feb-17 14:06):

*) routing - fixed ipv6 connected routes,
IPv6 connected routes disappeared after interface restart;
*) routing - fixed high CPU usage when adding BGP ipv6 routes;
*) winbox - fixed opening terminal window to KVM instance;
*) winbox - fixed connect button in wireless scan;
*) winbox - fixed make-binding in hotspot hosts;
*) ipsec - fix possible crash when ipv6 is enabled;
*) snmp - add usb power reset (see updated MIB);
http://www.mikrotik.com/download.html
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
User avatar
adryfia
newbie
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 9:30 am
Location: Mataram, Lombok, Indonesia, NTB
Contact:

Re: v5rc10 released

Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:54 pm

Still try.... :D
 
ekkas
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 562
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:01 pm
Location: South Africa

Re: v5rc10 released

Thu Feb 17, 2011 5:16 pm

I don't suppose any fix for the AP hang-up or bad connections as mentioned in ROS5rc9 thread have been found/fixed?
 
pbr3000
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 74
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:31 am

Re: v5rc10 released

Thu Feb 17, 2011 6:00 pm

Bug in long distance links in nv2 (10mhz, 42km): disconnects. Bug in vlan: put 2 interfaces in bridge (ether or wlan), create vlan "on the bridge", all works fine. Reboot the router and vlan traffic will stop. There's no problem in rc7. This just happen with vlan's on bridges, and i need this mode in many routers. Found the vlan bug in rc9 and rc10, don't tested in rc8.
PS: To works after reboot i need disable vlan, disable bridge then enable all.
 
petro25
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:49 pm
Location: Novosibirsk

Re: v5rc10 released

Thu Feb 17, 2011 6:19 pm

In 5RC7 VLAN works!

RC8 RC9 RC10 doesn't work!! After reboot to it no MAC in VLAN

Image
 
pbr3000
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 74
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:31 am

Re: v5rc10 released

Thu Feb 17, 2011 6:38 pm

Yes petro25, thank you for better clarification.
 
petro25
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:49 pm
Location: Novosibirsk

Re: v5rc10 released

Thu Feb 17, 2011 6:52 pm

Crutch for VLAN
To add in automatic loading the following script


/interface vlan set vlan1 use-service-tag=yes
/interface vlan set vlan1 use-service-tag=no

Well and to hope that in following release will correct
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Worldwide
Contact:

Re: v5rc10 released

Thu Feb 17, 2011 7:01 pm

We put SR71-A in a couple of x86 and now v5RC9 does not want to upgrade to rc10. It says - router rebooted without proper shutdown. And we can't change any settings on the wlan interfaces - router reboots "without proper shutdown".

:oops: :-? :cry:
wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NetworkPro_on_Quality_of_Service
 
User avatar
sergejs
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 6617
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 3:33 pm
Location: Riga, Latvia
Contact:

Re: v5rc10 released

Thu Feb 17, 2011 7:13 pm

NetworkPro, attach monitor or COM cable to the router and send the output to support after reboot command (support@mikrotik.com).
 
User avatar
sergejs
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 6617
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 3:33 pm
Location: Riga, Latvia
Contact:

Re: v5rc10 released

Thu Feb 17, 2011 7:38 pm

petro25, just curios do you have any other interface on the bridge or mac-address assigned to bridge?
When empty VLAN is added to bridge, there is no MAC-address assigned, as soon as admin-mac is set, the same MAC-address is set to VLAN.
 
kulek
just joined
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:07 am

Re: v5rc10 released

Thu Feb 17, 2011 7:46 pm

We put SR71-A in a couple of x86 and now v5RC9 does not want to upgrade to rc10. It says - router rebooted without proper shutdown. And we can't change any settings on the wlan interfaces - router reboots "without proper shutdown".

:oops: :-? :cry:
+1 , RB411AH , r52n ? It says - router rebooted without proper shutdown. And we can't change any settings on the wlan interfaces - router reboots "without proper shutdown".

send file to (support@mikrotik.com).
 
pbr3000
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 74
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:31 am

Re: v5rc10 released

Thu Feb 17, 2011 8:03 pm

petro25, just curios do you have any other interface on the bridge or mac-address assigned to bridge?
When empty VLAN is added to bridge, there is no MAC-address assigned, as soon as admin-mac is set, the same MAC-address is set to VLAN.
I'm not petro25 :D , but in my setup there's 2 ethernet interfaces in the bridge. In rc7 there's no problem.
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Worldwide
Contact:

Re: v5rc10 released

Thu Feb 17, 2011 8:04 pm

We had a suggestion problem might be in PCI->miniPCI converter voltage may be selected at 5V where as the cards should be given 3.3V http://ubnt.com/downloads/sr71a_datasheet.pdf

The other thing similar to this is - may be not enough power is getting to the card and we would need to solder fatter wires onto the card to supply the amperage through those.

What you think?
wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NetworkPro_on_Quality_of_Service
 
wispwest
Member
Member
Posts: 477
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 3:48 am

Re: v5rc10 released

Thu Feb 17, 2011 9:06 pm

We've noticed a drop in TX/RX signal strengths with our PtP's on every F/W above 4.2. I was thinking that maybe Mikrotik is just calculating the signal strength more accurate, and just reflecting a real signal that is lower, but that is not the case. There appears to be actual power loss when transmitting on the SR71-15 cards. I found this out when I upgraded a 25 mile PtP link where signal on 4.2 was -75db/-77db, and after the upgrade, dropped to -80db/-84db and the link kept dropping and could not keep alive. A site visit and downgrade to 4.2 brought the link back and good again. Will this ever get fixed with new firmwares?
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Worldwide
Contact:

Re: v5rc10 released

Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:17 pm

We have improvement:

We suspect issue could be because we had selected frequency 4800 and HT extension channel below control or something.

We removed the miniPCI cards and did a system reset configuration.

Then on clean config we put the cards back in and connected them together, 18km link.

We now have to find suitable frequencies that the NV2 would have good CCQ on.
wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NetworkPro_on_Quality_of_Service
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24317
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v5rc10 released

Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:36 pm

what about routing, has anyone tested it? there are many improvements in the routing department
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
User avatar
nz_monkey
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1825
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:53 pm
Location: Straya
Contact:

Re: v5rc10 released

Fri Feb 18, 2011 1:06 pm

Yes I have BGP receiving about 4000 routes on a RB1100 with 5.0rc10 as well as OSPF working. Also have OSPF running fine on a RB493AH.

So far (about 10 hours) it seems stable.


I do have MPLS issues on the RB1100, but no idea if these are related, I will email support...
http://thebrotherswisp.com/ | Mikrotik MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCINE | Fortinet FTCNA, FCNSP, FCT | Extreme Networks ENA
 
mars
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 228
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 1:43 pm

Re: v5rc10 released

Fri Feb 18, 2011 1:37 pm

We have improvement:

We suspect issue could be because we had selected frequency 4800 and HT extension channel below control or something.

We removed the miniPCI cards and did a system reset configuration.

Then on clean config we put the cards back in and connected them together, 18km link.

We now have to find suitable frequencies that the NV2 would have good CCQ on.

hi
do you run nv2 on your x86 router and if so does it stay connected
on our x86 with hn cards on n the links keep dropping every few seconds
 
User avatar
sergejs
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 6617
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 3:33 pm
Location: Riga, Latvia
Contact:

Re: v5rc10 released

Fri Feb 18, 2011 3:11 pm

petro25 and pbr3000, thank you very much for the reports.

However I see the same behavior for VLAN interface on bridge at 4.16 and 5.0rc10.

1)
VLAN interface is added to running bridge without any active interface;
- VLAN interface does not get MAC-address, until there is no MAC-address on bridge. Bridge gets MAC-address either by adding running interface to bridge or specifying admin-mac;

2) VLAN interface is added to running bridge with active interface (running state);
- VLAN gets the same MAC-addrress, as bridge got from running interface.

We have found one problem with VLAN on WDS interfaces, we are working on the fix for it, but Ethernet VLANs work correctly.
 
User avatar
neandero
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 243
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 11:43 am
Location: Inside Mind

Re: v5rc10 released

Fri Feb 18, 2011 6:22 pm

I don't know if there is anything I can do to solve the disconnect problem:
log.jpg
I have other RB's with other Radio like R52 and it's working ok, but only with R52hn, I get all disconnect reconnect.

the only time i can stop these disconnects is if i manually enter values for "noise floor threshold" but then i will have some
users not being able to connect at all, and some other will connect but can't surf, and some other will connect and surf but
with a very slow rate..

Could all these be the cause because I am using one chain on the R52Hn? I don't know why why why...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
Freqman
newbie
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:06 pm

Re: v5rc10 released

Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:14 pm

Has anyone else giving "Station Bridge" a try? I'm seeing all the traffic from the AP make it to the Station Bridge CPE. If I run a 30M speed test to one customer it shows up as wireless traffic over on the Station Bridge CPE (torch on the Station Bridge CPE WLAN). Fixing Station Pseudobridge for NV2 would make our "day" scratch that, make our year.

Mo C.
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Worldwide
Contact:

Re: v5rc10 released

Sat Feb 19, 2011 1:56 am

v5RC10, x86 with SR71-A - has crashed totally tonight after selecting a frequency around 5900-6100 MHz and HT Above Control. It is not coming back up.
wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NetworkPro_on_Quality_of_Service
 
pbr3000
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 74
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:31 am

Re: v5rc10 released

Sat Feb 19, 2011 7:32 am

petro25 and pbr3000, thank you very much for the reports.

However I see the same behavior for VLAN interface on bridge at 4.16 and 5.0rc10.

1)
VLAN interface is added to running bridge without any active interface;
- VLAN interface does not get MAC-address, until there is no MAC-address on bridge. Bridge gets MAC-address either by adding running interface to bridge or specifying admin-mac;

2) VLAN interface is added to running bridge with active interface (running state);
- VLAN gets the same MAC-addrress, as bridge got from running interface.

We have found one problem with VLAN on WDS interfaces, we are working on the fix for it, but Ethernet VLANs work correctly.
I understand, but i never cared about bridge admin-mac before in this router because until rc7 the bridge works flawless. After each reboot all vlan's just works. I have two ethernet ports in permanent connected state on this bridge (to switchs), then there's always a mac address.
 
bda
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 126
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 11:07 am
Location: Russia,Moscow

Re: v5rc10 released

Sat Feb 19, 2011 10:53 am

NTEL DH67CF and Intel Core i5-2400S 2.5Ghz Soket 1155 still not working normally...
God bless UNIX!
 
tenenbaum
newbie
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 6:59 pm

Re: v5rc10 released

Sun Feb 20, 2011 6:14 am

I apologize if this is in the wrong place. In version 4.x the port had a separate column in Torch window. Now the port is merged with the src or dst IP. Any chance of allowing or giving the option to the user to have a separate column for the port in 5.x?
 
weaselll
just joined
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 12:02 am

Re: v5rc10 released

Mon Feb 21, 2011 1:10 am

scsi support on dell poweredge 2650 not working ... can`t find hdd :(... i have Megaraid ... and still not working.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24317
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v5rc10 released

Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:43 am

NTEL DH67CF and Intel Core i5-2400S 2.5Ghz Soket 1155 still not working normally...
we didn't change any drivers so you shouldn't expect support for new hardware
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
User avatar
sergejs
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 6617
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 3:33 pm
Location: Riga, Latvia
Contact:

Re: v5rc10 released

Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:35 am

pbr3000
I understand, but i never cared about bridge admin-mac before in this router because until rc7 the bridge works flawless. After each reboot all vlan's just works. I have two ethernet ports in permanent connected state on this bridge (to switchs), then there's always a mac address.
When two active Ethernet ports are added to the bridge, then MAC-address is assigned for VLAn added on bridge. (it works for me).

Contact support (support@mikrotik.com) with attached support output file, if you have different behavior.


bda

Please, send us support output file from you router, when you have problems.
Include more detailed problem description as well.
 
stretch
just joined
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 1:25 am

Re: v5rc10 released

Mon Feb 21, 2011 12:56 pm

Hi,

I think v5rc10 broke SNMP. Worked fine on v5rc9 before.


Stretch
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24317
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v5rc10 released

Mon Feb 21, 2011 12:57 pm

Hi,

I think v5rc10 broke SNMP. Worked fine on v5rc9 before.


Stretch
works fine here. what exactly doesn't work for you ?
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
stretch
just joined
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 1:25 am

Re: v5rc10 released

Mon Feb 21, 2011 1:41 pm

Thanks for Your reply Normis, I upgraded two RB1100 last night to v5rc10 and all went well. This morning i checked PRTG and there is no reading after upgrade.

Just now i upgraded RB411 as a test from v5rc9 to v5rc10 and SNMP works fine on same PRTG.

Could it be RB1100 bug?


Thanks,

Stretch
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24317
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v5rc10 released

Mon Feb 21, 2011 1:45 pm

We tested RB1100 and it works also. Send a supout.rif to support please, we will check what's wrong
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
uldis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 3427
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 2:55 pm

Re: v5rc10 released

Mon Feb 21, 2011 1:50 pm

Has anyone else giving "Station Bridge" a try? I'm seeing all the traffic from the AP make it to the Station Bridge CPE. If I run a 30M speed test to one customer it shows up as wireless traffic over on the Station Bridge CPE (torch on the Station Bridge CPE WLAN). Fixing Station Pseudobridge for NV2 would make our "day" scratch that, make our year.

Mo C.
Thank you for the report - we will try to fix it.
 
mattx86
just joined
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 5:48 am

Re: v5rc10 released

Tue Feb 22, 2011 2:19 am

Is anyone else having an issue with CLI tab completion now? I.e., "/ping address[TAB]" ==> "/ping address% " I think it's been like that since the last few RCs; I just forgot to report it.
 
mattx86
just joined
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 5:48 am

Re: v5rc10 released

Tue Feb 22, 2011 7:09 am

I've found some more issue(s):

- Disabling a laptop's wireless adapter, sometimes results in all clients disconnecting for the same reason.
- Manually enabling/disabling a laptop's wireless adapter OR turning on/off a laptop will, most of the time, disconnect my DSL PPPoE client interface.

To rule out UPnP, UPnP is and was configured with an external (dsl-pppoe) and internal (lan-bridge) interface like so:
[X] Enabled
[ ] Allow To Disable External Interface
[X] Show Dummy Rule

Here's a log sample containing both issues, one happening after the other during my tests:
22:11:57 wireless,info 00:24:2C:xx:xx:xx@wlan1: disconnected, received disassoc: sending station leaving (8) <== manually disabled wireless adapter on laptop
22:12:03 wireless,info 00:26:5E:xx:xx:xx@wlan1: disconnected, received disassoc: sending station leaving (8) <== happened as a result? (a netbook)
22:12:06 wireless,info 00:26:5E:xx:xx:xx@wlan1: connected <== netbook automatically reconnected
22:12:06 pppoe,ppp,info dsl-pppoe: terminating... - disconnected <== PPPoE client interface disconnecting
22:12:06 pppoe,ppp,info dsl-pppoe: disconnected
22:12:06 pppoe,ppp,info dsl-pppoe: initializing...
22:12:06 pppoe,ppp,info dsl-pppoe: dialing...
22:12:11 pppoe,ppp,info dsl-pppoe: terminating... - disconnected
22:12:11 pppoe,ppp,info dsl-pppoe: disconnected
22:12:11 pppoe,ppp,info dsl-pppoe: initializing...
22:12:11 pppoe,ppp,info dsl-pppoe: dialing...
...
22:13:03 pppoe,ppp,info dsl-pppoe: authenticated
22:13:03 pppoe,ppp,info dsl-pppoe: connected <== finally reconnected (I don't think the time it takes to reconnect is MT-related; a cold-boot scenario results in first-time connects with recent versions)
The setup:
[Phone Jack]<--RJ11-->[DSL Modem as PPPoE relay]<--Cat7-->[10/100 Unman. Eth. Switch (Wired LAN)]<--Cat7-->[RB532 mipsle v5.0rc10/bridged with CM9 Atheros AR5213 providing 802.11 B/G with WPA/WPA2 PSK aes-ccm encryption]

With my desktop connected to the same unmanaged ethernet switch, my WinBox stays connected to the RB532, where I can view the log in real-time. (So it can't be a bridge issue, can it? When the last wireless client disconnects, it doesn't disrupt my WinBox connection.)

I'll e-mail support with a supout linking to this post.
Last edited by mattx86 on Tue Feb 22, 2011 9:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
janisk
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 6283
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 9:46 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v5rc10 released

Tue Feb 22, 2011 9:03 am

Is anyone else having an issue with CLI tab completion now? I.e., "/ping address[TAB]" ==> "/ping address% " I think it's been like that since the last few RCs; I just forgot to report it.
you do not have to use
/ping adddress=<IP address>
instead use
 /ping <IP address>
you only have to use address in API sentence, like this:
/ping
=address=<IP address>
 
mattx86
just joined
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 5:48 am

Re: v5rc10 released

Tue Feb 22, 2011 9:49 am

Thanks, I know. :)

By the way everyone, as far as the CLI tab completion issue, support informs me they are aware of it and it will be fixed in an upcoming version.
 
User avatar
asus
Member
Member
Posts: 403
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Mumbai, India

Re: v5rc10 released

Tue Feb 22, 2011 2:40 pm

I want to upgrade my router from rc5. can we use rc10 test usermanager? anything fixed in it?
Last edited by asus on Tue Feb 22, 2011 2:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24317
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v5rc10 released

Tue Feb 22, 2011 2:40 pm

can we use rc10 test usermanager? anything fixed in it?
sorry but not yet
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
Freqman
newbie
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:06 pm

Re: v5rc10 released

Tue Feb 22, 2011 4:28 pm

Thanks for the follow up. Just so everyone knows NV2 has been treating us great with throughput. 10 711's (all about 3KM) off an RB800 with a R52HN card we get about 30M speed test to each customer. Much thanks MT for this new protocol we just need to iron out the wrinkles before a larger implementation.


Has anyone else giving "Station Bridge" a try? I'm seeing all the traffic from the AP make it to the Station Bridge CPE. If I run a 30M speed test to one customer it shows up as wireless traffic over on the Station Bridge CPE (torch on the Station Bridge CPE WLAN). Fixing Station Pseudobridge for NV2 would make our "day" scratch that, make our year.

Mo C.
Thank you for the report - we will try to fix it.
 
ekkas
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 562
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 1:01 pm
Location: South Africa

Re: v5rc10 released

Tue Feb 22, 2011 4:49 pm

before a larger implementation.
You should maybe say "longer distance implementation." ;-)
We had major issues with our long range clients, (1)some disconnect completely, (2)some is unstable and others (3)have bad VoIP call quality. (In order of long to medium range links)
But MT is aware of it (I hope, since I've sent supouts) so I'm sure it will be fixed soon.

Once NV2 and/or the 4.16 nv2 wireless package is fixed, we'll love to replace a bunch of short-range UBNT CPEs with SXTs and upgrade longer links with MT dual-pol links.
 
Panoulis
just joined
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:32 am

Re: v5rc10 released

Tue Feb 22, 2011 8:53 pm

ovpn server is dead in RC10 :(

it was working just fine in rc9 now it just doesn't do nothing :(
 
User avatar
DogHead
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 194
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 9:36 pm
Location: Anywhere you want me to be

Re: v5rc10 released

Wed Feb 23, 2011 1:08 am

We have OVPN working fine under 5.0rc10. Upgrade worked fine and link works fine. We are using two MT routers to link remote offices.
WOOF BANG!
 
mindragon
newbie
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:50 pm

RTFM...and it works better now!

Wed Feb 23, 2011 2:38 am

Okay...so I re-read everything on how to setup an 802.11n transparent bridge properly. Turns out that with NV2 it is best to use AP Bridge + WDS on one side and Station WDS on the other. For whatever reason the other way that I was doing the point to point bridge didn't work at all. Best method to follow is here:

For the radio link: http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/802.11n_Setup_Guide -- pay close attention to the HT notes -- you can't put your radio on channel 8 and have "HT extension channel", for instance.
For WDS -- this basically works: http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Transpare ... o_Networks
No need to create the WDS as Mikrotik does it automagically.

Now using the 2.4ghz band, I see over 200mbps of bandwidth from time to time but I still see a 50% drop overall on my internet connection. On a PC off the main router, I see over 10mbps to the internet. On a PC off the bridge I see 5mbps on average.

I'm going to try to switch it to 5ghz and see how that works.
 
bda
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 126
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 11:07 am
Location: Russia,Moscow

Re: v5rc10 released

Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:32 am

NTEL DH67CF and Intel Core i5-2400S 2.5Ghz Soket 1155 still not working normally...
we didn't change any drivers so you shouldn't expect support for new hardware
Thanks for reply. Can I hope on drivers update?
God bless UNIX!
 
Panoulis
just joined
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:32 am

Re: v5rc10 released

Wed Feb 23, 2011 10:53 am

We have OVPN working fine under 5.0rc10. Upgrade worked fine and link works fine. We are using two MT routers to link remote offices.
well im using ubuntu as a client and it works now just and wen i can connect to the router if i disconnect it needs reboot to work again :/
 
WirelessRudy
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 3089
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:54 pm
Location: Spain

Re: v5rc10 released

Thu Feb 24, 2011 1:14 am

I see in v5.0rc10 that IP address is not showing "Broadcast" IP any more? (Both winbox and telnet)
Is this v5.x specific?
Any reason for this? (Although never changed it is helpfull while building or troubleshooting your network...)
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: v5rc10 released

Thu Feb 24, 2011 9:14 am

RC8 changelog
*) removed broadcast setting from ip address;
 
forne
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 3:18 pm

Re: v5rc10 released

Thu Feb 24, 2011 10:40 am

[admin@router] > /system script add name=test source=":global var 10"
[admin@router] > /system script run test
[admin@router] > /environment print
"var"=10
[admin@router] > /system script environment print
 # USER                            NAME                          VALUE
 0 admin                           var                           10
[admin@router] > /system script environment remove 0
[admin@router] > /environment print
[admin@router] > /system script environment print
 # USER                            NAME                          VALUE
[admin@router] > /system script run test
[admin@router] > /environment print
"var"=10
[admin@router] > /system script environment print
 # USER                            NAME                          VALUE
Why the variable "var" is no longer shown under /system script environment? Is this a bug?
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: v5rc10 released

Thu Feb 24, 2011 10:59 am

This is a known bug. Avoid removing variables form environment manually for now.
 
uldis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 3427
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 2:55 pm

Re: RTFM...and it works better now!

Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:11 pm

Okay...so I re-read everything on how to setup an 802.11n transparent bridge properly. Turns out that with NV2 it is best to use AP Bridge + WDS on one side and Station WDS on the other. For whatever reason the other way that I was doing the point to point bridge didn't work at all. Best method to follow is here:

For the radio link: http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/802.11n_Setup_Guide -- pay close attention to the HT notes -- you can't put your radio on channel 8 and have "HT extension channel", for instance.
For WDS -- this basically works: http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Transpare ... o_Networks
No need to create the WDS as Mikrotik does it automagically.

Now using the 2.4ghz band, I see over 200mbps of bandwidth from time to time but I still see a 50% drop overall on my internet connection. On a PC off the main router, I see over 10mbps to the internet. On a PC off the bridge I see 5mbps on average.

I'm going to try to switch it to 5ghz and see how that works.
What was the first method that you tried to use with Nv2?
Please tell us more about that 50% drop.
 
User avatar
adryfia
newbie
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 9:30 am
Location: Mataram, Lombok, Indonesia, NTB
Contact:

Re: v5rc10 released

Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:59 pm

I have a slight problem on RB750 with ROS v5.0rc10, I used queue trees for hotspots with 1024k limit and full bandwidth utilization when the loading page will be open very long, whereas the ROS v.4.16 never happened like this. If my setting is wrong then the stable version was bound to happen this way but in the stable version is not the case. Hopefully this can be corrected by the team MIKROTIK.
 
Homa
just joined
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 11:55 am

Re: v5rc10 released

Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:15 pm

sstp timeout still buggy
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: v5rc10 released

Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:35 am

I have a slight problem on RB750 with ROS v5.0rc10, I used queue trees for hotspots with 1024k limit and full bandwidth utilization when the loading page will be open very long, whereas the ROS v.4.16 never happened like this. If my setting is wrong then the stable version was bound to happen this way but in the stable version is not the case. Hopefully this can be corrected by the team MIKROTIK.
Send mail to support with a supout file generated at the time when this problem happens.
 
mattx86
just joined
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 5:48 am

Re: v5rc10 released

Fri Feb 25, 2011 1:56 pm

Following up on my bug report (earlier in this thread) of WLAN clients connecting/disconnecting causing my PPPoE session to drop: Despite my Winbox session staying connected during the issue, MikroTik support and I have determined it to be a bridge issue, whereby once the last wireless client disconnects (or the first wireless client connects), the MAC address of the bridge swaps. I now specify the Admin MAC of the bridge, and so far so good.
 
bda
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 126
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 11:07 am
Location: Russia,Moscow

Re: v5rc10 released

Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:58 am

NTEL DH67CF and Intel Core i5-2400S 2.5Ghz Soket 1155 still not working normally...
we didn't change any drivers so you shouldn't expect support for new hardware
Can we hope on update?
God bless UNIX!
 
tanjil
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 54
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 11:15 pm

Re: v5rc10 released

Tue Mar 01, 2011 3:08 am

Dear Sir

im using 5.0 rc4... will it be good if i upgrade to 5.0rc10?

i mean which version is stable between 5.04 and 10

Thanks in advance
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24317
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v5rc10 released

Tue Mar 01, 2011 7:58 am

rc10 is very good
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
jcem
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 4:41 pm
Location: Grebbestad, Sweden

Re: v5rc10 released

Tue Mar 01, 2011 9:44 am

WDS-Slave is very unstable. Stops responding, suddenly very high
latency and traffic stops. Drop connection helps for a while.

Also virtual AP does not work on top of WDS-Slave

Had to downgrade to 4.16.

RGDS
Last edited by jcem on Tue Mar 01, 2011 3:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
uldis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 3427
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 2:55 pm

Re: v5rc10 released

Tue Mar 01, 2011 9:58 am

Station WDS is very unstable. Stops responding, suddenly very high
latency and traffic stops. Drop connection helps for a while.

Also virtual AP does not work on top of Station WDS

Had to downgrade to 4.16.

RGDS
please provide us more info on that problem. What configuration you have? What hw-retries value you have on the AP, try to lower it to 7 or 4.

Also virtual AP will never work on top of station-wds interface, it's not meant to work in this way
 
jcem
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 4:41 pm
Location: Grebbestad, Sweden

Re: v5rc10 released

Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:45 am

I have been running with hw-retries=10. The AP is RC10 an works fine. It's only the
WDS-Slave that is not working in RC10. The station is a simple 411 with L4 working as a repeater.

I like to have the Virtual AP (with dhcp on that interface) on top of the WDS-Slave.
Then I have a Virtual AP with DHCP(hidden SSID) as an easy way to enter for service.
It's been working great until 5.0

Too bad if this stops working with v5

RGDS
Last edited by jcem on Tue Mar 01, 2011 2:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24317
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v5rc10 released

Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:49 am

You can't have station and AP modes on one wireless card. StationWDS and VirtualAP will not work on the same interface. It's not a bug, it's something that is not made because it's not possible (at least in v5). It has not worked before.
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
alexspils
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 176
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 8:57 pm

Re: v5rc10 released

Tue Mar 01, 2011 12:38 pm

can we have oids for ups line voltage and battary charge ?
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24317
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v5rc10 released

Tue Mar 01, 2011 12:52 pm

can you show "print" output of what values you see currently? and "print oid"?
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
mangust
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 224
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 11:14 am

Re: v5rc10 released

Tue Mar 01, 2011 1:05 pm

rc10 is very good
Hope it is last RC in V5. :)
 
jcem
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 4:41 pm
Location: Grebbestad, Sweden

Re: v5rc10 released

Tue Mar 01, 2011 2:01 pm

I have been running with hw-retries=10. The AP is RC10 an works fine. It's only the
WDS-slave that is not working in RC10. The station is a simple 411 with L4 working as a repeater.

I like to have the Virtual AP (with dhcp on that interface) on top of the WDS-slave.
Then I have a Virtual AP with DHCP(hidden SSID) as an easy way to enter for service.
It's been working great until 5.0

Too bad if this stops working with v5

RGDS
I'm sorry I been telling the wrong storry. When I've been writing Station-WDS when I
really wanted to say WDS - Slave.

Sorry.....

But the real problem is still WDS-slave with rc10. Something that works in 4.16.

Rgds

(updated my previous question to avoid confusion)
 
alexspils
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 176
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 8:57 pm

Re: v5rc10 released

Tue Mar 01, 2011 2:40 pm

[alex@router] /system ups> pr oid
expected end of command (line 1 column 4)
[alex@router] /system ups> monitor ups1
on-line: yes
runtime-left: 15m25s
battery-charge: 100%
line-voltage: 229V
output-voltage: 229V
load: 34%

I can see runtimeleft via snmp but nothing else.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
uldis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 3427
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 2:55 pm

Re: v5rc10 released

Tue Mar 01, 2011 3:14 pm

jcem, please email support about that problem, as we are not aware of it.
It would be great if you could send us the support output files from your routers when it is working fine in v4.16.
Then we could try to reproduce it locally.
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Worldwide
Contact:

Re: v5rc10 released

Thu Mar 03, 2011 5:34 am

... breaks FTP using Explicit SSL (Auth TLS)

My bad, root cause was Nth load balancing.
Last edited by NetworkPro on Sat Mar 05, 2011 2:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NetworkPro_on_Quality_of_Service
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Worldwide
Contact:

Re: v5rc10 released

Fri Mar 04, 2011 2:57 am

... a traceroute that looks like there is a route loop.
nope, turns out to have been caused by a NAT rule upstream that cough this traffic in error.



v5 RC up to 9 x86 : USB Flash store - router may stop knowing that it has a USB store and start thinking that it has none therefore reverting to default configs. I suspect this is caused by too long periods of inactivity to the store and that it can be painfully circumvented by enabling graphing to be saved, which would wear out the Flash :|
Last edited by NetworkPro on Wed Mar 09, 2011 3:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.
wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NetworkPro_on_Quality_of_Service
 
kirshteins
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 592
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 10:55 am

Re: v5rc10 released

Fri Mar 04, 2011 12:41 pm

v5RC10 mipsbe: having an IP on a loopback interface (a bridge interface with no ports) router thinks it has to forward ICMP traffic to its loopback interface so it decrements the TTL once redundantly leading to a traceroute that looks like there is a route loop.
Is this problem repeatable in older versions than v5.0rc10? Is there any device in between? I was not able to reproduce this problem with very simple setup. Perhaps its good idea to send supout.rif file to support@mikrotik.com.
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Worldwide
Contact:

Re: v5rc10 released

Fri Mar 04, 2011 6:40 pm

Thank you very much. Supout sent.
v5 RC up to 9 x86 : USB Flash store - router may stop knowing that it has a USB store and start thinking that it has none therefore reverting to default configs. I suspect this is caused by too long periods of inactivity to the store and that it can be painfully circumvented by enabling graphing to be saved, which would wear out the Flash :|
Are you investigating this? This happened on different Intel machines, one was an Atom one.
wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NetworkPro_on_Quality_of_Service
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Worldwide
Contact:

Re: v5rc10 released

Wed Mar 09, 2011 3:07 pm

v5RC10 mipsbe: having an IP on a loopback interface (a bridge interface with no ports) router thinks it has to forward ICMP traffic to its loopback interface so it decrements the TTL once redundantly leading to a traceroute that looks like there is a route loop.
Is this problem repeatable in older versions than v5.0rc10? Is there any device in between? I was not able to reproduce this problem with very simple setup. Perhaps its good idea to send supout.rif file to support@mikrotik.com.
My bad, NAT rule on upstream router caused this. Sorry. I should increase the caffeine dosage it seems.
wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NetworkPro_on_Quality_of_Service
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8319
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: v5rc10 released

Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:49 am

Thank you very much. Supout sent.
v5 RC up to 9 x86 : USB Flash store - router may stop knowing that it has a USB store and start thinking that it has none therefore reverting to default configs. I suspect this is caused by too long periods of inactivity to the store and that it can be painfully circumvented by enabling graphing to be saved, which would wear out the Flash :|
Are you investigating this? This happened on different Intel machines, one was an Atom one.
we see something like that periodically on v3.28 with HDD... graphing is set to be saved each 5min, but after a month or two (2month ago it took about two weeks) HDD can disappear, passwords are reset to empty ones... when trying to issue /system reboot, I get kernel panic almost every time... huh, just my 2c
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Worldwide
Contact:

Re: v5rc10 released

Sun Mar 13, 2011 9:12 am

This issue still happens on v5RC12 of 10th March, with User Manager.

All of a sudden, in the log there are a bunch of errors about not being able to find the database. Then when I check Store - there's nothing there, it's gone.

I am not able to save a Supout - probably because there is no store to save it to.

I am able to click Restart in WinBox to bring the machine back to normal operation.

This happens even when the graphing with saving on HDD is turned on.

Happens on all kinds of hardware (Intel chipsets) where RouterOS is on a USB Flash stick. The USB Flash sticks are all Verbatim, from a good source.

Tested RouterOS versions are all v5 RC ones
wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NetworkPro_on_Quality_of_Service
 
User avatar
nz_monkey
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1825
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:53 pm
Location: Straya
Contact:

Re: v5rc10 released

Mon Mar 28, 2011 11:02 am

We have found one problem with VLAN on WDS interfaces, we are working on the fix for it, but Ethernet VLANs work correctly.
Hi Sergejs

Has the issue with vlan's on dynamic WDS bridges been resolved ? It has been causing me pain the last two weeks.

Ticket#2011032766000014

I have figured out a work-around, but it would be better to get a release with this bug fixed.
http://thebrotherswisp.com/ | Mikrotik MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCINE | Fortinet FTCNA, FCNSP, FCT | Extreme Networks ENA
 
kirshteins
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 592
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 10:55 am

Re: v5rc10 released

Mon Mar 28, 2011 12:15 pm

Starting from v5.0rc7 there is a bug with VLAN interface not inheriting bridge MAC address. It will be fixed in next release.
 
User avatar
nz_monkey
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1825
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:53 pm
Location: Straya
Contact:

Re: v5rc10 released

Mon Mar 28, 2011 12:19 pm

Thanks kirshteins

It sounds like there are a lot of fixes in the upcoming release.
http://thebrotherswisp.com/ | Mikrotik MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCINE | Fortinet FTCNA, FCNSP, FCT | Extreme Networks ENA

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 81 guests