skins are stored as files in /skins with the <skin name>.jsonIs there a way to delete unnecessary skin?
Yes, I fully second this!Wy dont you make the check/uncheck options to winbox? !
before webfig everyone asked for an OS independent interface. now it's backwards againYes, I fully second this!Wy dont you make the check/uncheck options to winbox? !
I want a browser independent management program for ros. But winbox could definately have more edit functionality...
One of the MT-ros advantages over ubnt-ros is the fact that no matter if my browser is crashed, not loading or whatever, I can still reach my unit with a gui.
I can even prioritize my gui (winbox) in my network. With http for only management this becomes much more complicated.
MT, don't copy too much from ubnt. The groove is a very good idea, but their html management gui sucks imho.
No, I never asked for it. And me, but also some others, have been asking for winbox improvements since the day 2.xx versions where in use.before webfig everyone asked for an OS independent interface. now it's backwards again
I also prefer Winbox and the command line via ssh or a terminal session.well, I am sure I am not the only one preferring winbox above all other, with CLI in case winbox won't work.
This concerns me, while IE is continously bashed for it's lack of standards, security flaws, you can't escape that it's on (almost) every Windows PC out there, and if there are "firewall nazis" there are certainly workstation equivalents that don't want programs installed without authorisation, including web browsers.webfig is mainly tested on mozilla firefox and google chrome. There might be some quirks with IE as it lacks features in some areas (eg. standard support)
Normis, Good Answer !!We have no plan to discontinue Winbox. Both interfaces will coexist.
That's great! Thanks, Steve.If you haven't tried WebFig lately, please give it a try before posting here, I think you will be impressed. This is a great step forward and the Design Skin gives you the ability to customize or "dumb down" the UI for your customers. I think this is what we have asked for and it works very well. I am adding it to my MTCNA curriculum.
thank you. So isnt there a way to change the webfig login, like I do with the hotspot login page?you can change the login page with the branding package, which is available to resellers and distributors.can I change the webfig skin html and/or the html of login page (ex. add company logo) ?
- user try to load direct link to Wireless
- webfig go to skin file, to see what are seting for wireless menu
- if wireless enable , open page normal
- if wireless disable do redirect on status page , or block with some other method
There is no problem with security, it's easy to create 'read-only' user group.webfig skins are not a security feature - it allows to tailor user interface to fit the user. it is still possible to access hidden pages.
It is not a security tool. If user has sufficient rights it is possible to access hidden features by other means.
I am using this with 5.26, but still not working. Any further help pleaseDid you try this?Found the answer myself
its probably a bug in 5.11.
Upgraded (manually as auto upgrade is not implemented in 5.11) to 5.26 and everything works fine.
False alarm after all...
Thanks for your suggestion, but i am sorry. I cleared the cache of my browser and try to open the winfig web browser and its still opening same normal winfig web browser and not specific designed one. I'm not getting why this is so? Any further help from anyone out there to fix this webfig skin designed issued?Not sure I can help but if I were you I would clear the cache of my browser or try a browser I haven't visited webfig with before. Control+F5 is on my Firefox but other browsers may (will) have a different command. Similar effect is if you use "Incognito mode" or "Private browsing".
Please let me know if it worked.
The skin has to be assigned to user group of the user.
Thanks for keep supporting. I really appreciate. I am using latest version v5.26 and created skin as per the link you have provided and explained other ones on net. But unfortunately nothing happened. Created a new user group with restricted rights as much as possible and assigned this new skin to it. What i'm missing to cofig. the setting now? Please review the attached screenshort for more clear details and would heartily appreciated your further help on this to fix this.Hi. I already showed you how to do it: http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 96#p426596.
Try the newer version, i am not going to install 5.x and check if it is possible or how it is possible. Unfortunatelly the pictures are damaged in my tapatalk client - will look later.
absolutely ..even a simple find/edit/fix is hard on relatively complex firewalls without columns customizationIn particular, is there a way to add columns like "to-address" in nat and all other firewall columns?
Without them, webfig is not very useful for firewall.
Yes of course, just disable http access in /ip servicecan I disable access from webfig, and only access via winbox. in ver 6.7?
I have a little issue with my webfig desing skin feature, and i hope you guys will be able to help me. Problem is, that some parts work - and some dont. For example, i can hide everything from main panel located on the left, but when im trying to hide something specific, like wireless card options, it just wont save. I mean, im unchecking the box next to the option that i want to be hidden, click save, refresh the page and nothing happens. Same goes for translating. After save + refresh procedure, everything stays the same.
Im using RB 433 with v6.22 soft, firefox browser (but i have tested it with chrome also).
Any ideas ?
pardon me, SSH ? secure, platform/OS independant, fast, clean... did i mention secure ?before webfig everyone asked for an OS independent interface. now it's backwards again
I also look for a way to disable these "disable" and "remove" buttons in the overview/table page. I tried to disable the "Enabled" field in the details page but this does not have an effect on the overview. It is a really big risk to accidentially disable a primary interface without safe mode.Love webfig, however I would like to see the ability to disable the "disable eable buttons" particuarly in "interfaces" you can click the "D" to disable the interface, would like a read-only or remove option for those buttons, either for individual interfaces or as a whole.