I am just about to complete a job where there is 2x full duplex wireless n links.

I'm in the testing phase at the moment. I currently have 2x 435g's per end, handling the full duplex part, now to load balance these I'm going to add a rb750g each end. I've got the 435.s doing eoip at the moment. I'm wondering whether I should bond the bridged ether ports from the 435's.

However in balance-rr mode if one of the wireless links was to drop out then it would limit the second link to half duplex as well.

if I was to use pcc instead both links wouldn't be equally utilized. However it would utilise the links better during a failure.

Does anyone have any ideas which would be better or any better ideas.

Thanks in advance
Ryan

___________Vlan1 (id1) -- bridge -- Vlan1 (id1)
---Bonding_________________________________bonding --
___________Vlan2 (id2) -- bridge -- Vlan2 (id2)


ip 10.222.100.1/30 ip 10.222.100.2/30
ip for control

0 R name=bonding1 mtu=1500 mac-address=00:0C:42:A3:AA:67 arp=enabled slaves=vlan1,vlan2
mode=balance-rr primary=none link-monitoring=arp arp-interval=100ms arp-ip-targets=10.222.100.2 mii-interval=100ms
down-delay=0ms up-delay=0ms lacp-rate=1sec transmit-hash-policy=layer-2

Did I mention that It's not a routed network deal, Full Layer 2 Pass Through. There is some QOS to be applied but it's the same network at each end

So I've currently got.

Network -> QOS (RB750g) -> Balance-rr to port 4,5 on RB750g -> EoIP Tunnel across each pair of 435g's.
2 at each end, EoIP 1 to 1 , 2 to 2

OSPF underlying on RB435's to Full Duplex the links.

Is that what you meant? petro25

There is no I not it meant

NO EoIP

need VLAN