Community discussions

 
doush
Long time Member
Long time Member
Topic Author
Posts: 625
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 3:11 pm

Feature Request: MTR

Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:23 pm

The only thing missing in the tools.

One of the best debugging tool ever
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MTR_%28software%29
 
Devil
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 9:13 am

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Sat Jun 02, 2012 5:15 pm

Yes, that would be helpful
Best Regards
 
LukasSVK
newbie
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 1:57 am
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Sun Jun 03, 2012 12:12 am

+1, MTR is very userful tool
 
User avatar
space007
just joined
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 12:30 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Sun Jun 03, 2012 10:34 am

+1

good idea
 
InoX
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1963
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:44 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Sun Jun 03, 2012 12:52 pm

There is already Traceroute.
 
User avatar
space007
just joined
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 12:30 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:08 am

There is already Traceroute.
yes yes, there is also already ping...

But for you here it is in more detail link .

If you r lazy, here is a summary:
The real advantage of mtr over ping or traceroute is, it shows where exactly the packet loss is happening in the route to the destination host in realtime. It shows the loss percentage on each hosts, which can give us valuable information on which specific provider is having a network issue. Also, since mtr is using ICMP ECHO requests, it will go through the routers which have blocked udp packets. So mtr may work where traceroute is not working.
So yes, mtr is a tool/feature which is good and needed, and no, there is no good excuse to exclude it.


rgrds
 
slech
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 533
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:03 pm
Location: Moldova, Chisinau

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Mon Jun 04, 2012 11:02 am

I will be very nice.
sorry for my english
 
Solaris
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:05 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:48 pm

+1 Really helpful for track routing problems!.
 
Ciambot
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 5:22 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Tue Jun 05, 2012 9:52 am

There is already Traceroute.
yes yes, there is also already ping...

But for you here it is in more detail link .

If you r lazy, here is a summary:
The real advantage of mtr over ping or traceroute is, it shows where exactly the packet loss is happening in the route to the destination host in realtime. It shows the loss percentage on each hosts, which can give us valuable information on which specific provider is having a network issue. Also, since mtr is using ICMP ECHO requests, it will go through the routers which have blocked udp packets. So mtr may work where traceroute is not working.
So yes, mtr is a tool/feature which is good and needed, and no, there is no good excuse to exclude it.


rgrds
So, it is like "pathping".
For sure it is useful, I perform this this test opening a lot of ping's windows...
 
doush
Long time Member
Long time Member
Topic Author
Posts: 625
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 3:11 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Tue Jun 05, 2012 2:03 pm

MT team ?
I am sure a lot more people will find it useful too.

Also if possible, add it to v5.x :)
 
User avatar
LZiX
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 8:33 pm
Location: Kazakhstan

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Sun Jun 17, 2012 1:08 am

+1 helpful
 
ditonet
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 841
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:52 am
Location: Europe/Poland/Konstancin-Jeziorna
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Mon Jun 18, 2012 1:38 am

+1

Regards,
Grzegorz | MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCSE | konsultacje MikroTik Warszawa
It is a book about a Spanish guy called Manual. You should read it. - Dilbert
 
Lupin
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 265
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 10:22 pm
Location: Italy

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:23 am

+1 Thanks
 
User avatar
Mixiron
just joined
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 11:04 am
Location: Iran,Tehran
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Tue Jun 19, 2012 10:33 am

i would be great !!!!
it is a basic linux troubleshooting tools , it should be in Mikrotik for ipv6 and v4, in live format with refresh interval input , reserve DNS option,packet loss in color ,
Mayssam Rahmatian
MTCNA - MTCWE - MTCRE
 
herschel
just joined
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 7:56 am
Location: NYC

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Tue Jun 19, 2012 11:31 am

+1 yup
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8319
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:24 am

why can't you use it from your PC? =)
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
lambert
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 533
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 1:09 am

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:27 pm

Because my PC and I, are not in the same country with the network having difficulties.

Because when my PC and I are on the network having difficulties, return traffic may take a different path than traffic from my location out.

You don't always know what is going on until you've looked at it from both ends.
...
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 24271
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Mon Jun 25, 2012 8:40 am

Because my PC and I, are not in the same country with the network having difficulties.

Because when my PC and I are on the network having difficulties, return traffic may take a different path than traffic from my location out.

You don't always know what is going on until you've looked at it from both ends.
...
these things are easily solved by tunneling to the router, it's also more secure to manage your router if you are on an encrypted tunnel.
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
mdraca
newbie
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:06 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:16 am

So, looks like no mtr, come on don't be lazy. By the rate new versions are coming out u can put it in, doesnt actually have to work, it will be properly debuged in a year or so and usable a year after that. win-win
 
User avatar
space007
just joined
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 12:30 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Sat Jun 30, 2012 9:11 am

So, looks like no mtr, come on don't be lazy. By the rate new versions are coming out u can put it in, doesnt actually have to work, it will be properly debuged in a year or so and usable a year after that. win-win
Copy/paste the source code, color output match with ROS console, make the basic frame in winbox, with one input, eventually 3-4 most used options.

How big is mtr compiled anyway ? 8)
All in all, ~35kb max !!

Its not that We/I are asking UDP in OVPN or rewrite of syslog format or whatever else regarding complex services in the ROS.
The necessity to need to make this tread so long, its depressing.
 
brixlinda
just joined
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:55 am
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Sun Jul 01, 2012 4:01 am

brixlinda
Industrial grade Serial RS232 to Ethernet Converter, also called a Ethernet to RS232 Converter.
http://www.usconverters.com/index.php?m ... cts_id=225
 
LukasSVK
newbie
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 1:57 am
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Sun Jul 01, 2012 4:25 am

exactly ... we want mtr ! :-)
 
doush
Long time Member
Long time Member
Topic Author
Posts: 625
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 3:11 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:52 pm

Normis;
Could you please shed a light for us if it is possible in the future to see MTR added to the tools to RouterOS ?
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 24271
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:59 pm

Currently we have no such plans. You can run MTR from the PC where you are connecting from.
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
doush
Long time Member
Long time Member
Topic Author
Posts: 625
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 3:11 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:24 pm

Its bad that you dont even consider to implement it.

In ubnt router, you can do apt-get install mtr and use it right away. I wish MT could be more responsive to feature requests this much popular and also relatively easy to implement.
 
jfoshee
just joined
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 6:20 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Wed Jul 11, 2012 5:49 pm

I agree with this one
 
syadnom
Member
Member
Posts: 405
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 7:29 am

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Thu Jul 12, 2012 5:46 pm

+1 thanks
 
odge
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 102
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 2:53 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:25 am

This tool would greatly aid network diagnosis, and would enable large MT based networks to find faults faster.

I really hope you re-review having MTR included as a tool. Adding yourself into a tunnel is not always acceptable, plus it shows your own latency spikes inside the pingpath/mtr printout, making them less reliable, and often unusable.
 
eflanery
Member
Member
Posts: 382
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 10:11 pm
Location: Moscow, ID
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Tue Apr 16, 2013 6:19 pm

MTR (or equivalent) on the routers would come in handy.

Running it over a tunnel from a host isn't nearly as useful, for multiple reasons.

At a minimum, latency and jitter over the tunnel itself can't be eliminated from the results; and it is very difficult to run the test in multiple directions (either simultaneously from both ends of the path in question, or from multiple sources). There are times when it would help to run MTRs from a dozen or more source routers, and setting up a multiple-tunnel/complex-NAT edifice to make that work would take hours.

--Eric
 
odge
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 102
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 2:53 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Tue Apr 16, 2013 6:32 pm

i got a reply saying the just arent planning it anytime soon.

Its a pity, hopefully more people review this thread. I assume most people aren't familiar with MTR, unfortunately for them. If they did, they'd find it as useful as a traceroute.
 
bawolek
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 60
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 3:33 pm
Location: Poland/Wroclaw

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Tue Apr 16, 2013 7:29 pm

+1

Regards,
 
Nuke
newbie
Posts: 42
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 7:35 pm
Location: South Africa
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:46 pm

Will add my vote too. I find mtr most usefull.
 
infused
Member
Member
Posts: 305
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:33 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Thu Apr 18, 2013 11:48 am

If it's already an external tool, why bloat routeros?
 
friction
newbie
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 1:27 pm
Location: Werchter, Belgium

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Thu Apr 18, 2013 12:07 pm

Sometimes you don't have access to hosts on a remote network, but you do have access to the router. MTR Can be implemented as a replacement for traceroute, to reduce the 'bloatware-effect'

+1 for MTR
I am not a complete idiot, some parts are missing. [CCNA Sec / CCNP / LPIC-1]
 
doush
Long time Member
Long time Member
Topic Author
Posts: 625
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 3:11 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Thu Apr 18, 2013 3:10 pm

Bloat-ware ?

Are you kidding me ?

We have LCD, SMB etc which are completely useless to %99 of the people and the most useful tool after PING will make it a bloatware ?

If MT is smart enough, they would listen their customers and implement it right away.
 
User avatar
soulflyhigh
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 173
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:20 am

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Fri Apr 19, 2013 9:06 am

Bloat-ware ?

Are you kidding me ?

We have LCD, SMB etc which are completely useless to %99 of the people and the most useful tool after PING will make it a bloatware ?

If MT is smart enough, they would listen their customers and implement it right away.
100% TRUE
MTCRE, MTCTCE
 
rower
newbie
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 2:39 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Fri Apr 26, 2013 4:21 pm

while someone is talking about "bloatware" i would like to remind, that compiled binary is around 60K in size (v0.75, in centos weights 56K). and everybody is able to disable unneeded packages, if there is need to really squeeze something out. unfortunately these packages are much less granulated, than one might wish... :)

as for MTR itself - yes, it would be more than welcome addition to MTROS :)
 
User avatar
natanielklug
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 6:09 pm
Location: Cascavel/PR/Brasil

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:37 pm

+4 from Certto Telecom (Brazil).

MTR on Mikrotik would be a wonderfull tool.
 
User avatar
janisk
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 6283
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 9:46 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Tue Apr 30, 2013 3:27 pm

it is on the drawing board. Just do not hold your breath waiting for it, it could take some time.
 
doush
Long time Member
Long time Member
Topic Author
Posts: 625
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 3:11 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Wed May 01, 2013 2:17 pm

Great news Janisk.
Thanks for listening us.

MTR will be a great addition to the tools.
 
keithy
newbie
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 7:00 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Wed May 01, 2013 3:09 pm

Great news Janisk.
Thanks for listening us.

MTR will be a great addition to the tools.

+1

Thank you!
 
defekt
just joined
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 4:43 pm
Location: Bulgaria

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Thu May 02, 2013 5:57 pm

+1 thanks
 
wildflower42
just joined
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu May 09, 2013 12:43 am

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Thu May 09, 2013 12:50 am

it is on the drawing board. Just do not hold your breath waiting for it, it could take some time.
Having MTR in RouterOS would be wonderful. Thank you for letting us know that MikroTik will work on it.
 
Neilson
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 174
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 10:42 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Wed May 15, 2013 3:44 pm

HaPe

I know your english isn't the greatest but can I please ask you to read through the chain before you reply.

Your reply was posted 1 week after Janisk posted that they have listened to the requests and are planning on putting MTR into RouterOS as soon as their development schedule allows it.

However you have replied to a 10 month old post and be fairly abusive in this response to information that is now out of date.

Thank you
Alexander
 
netwpl
newbie
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:09 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Tue May 28, 2013 7:44 pm

+1 MTR - would be GREAT!

greetz from austria.
 
megazloj
just joined
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu May 23, 2013 3:07 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Thu May 30, 2013 11:18 am

+1!
 
doush
Long time Member
Long time Member
Topic Author
Posts: 625
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 3:11 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Tue Jul 02, 2013 8:10 pm

Any news about MTR ?

I already started to hold my breath :)
 
szastan
newbie
Posts: 32
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2011 7:44 pm
Location: Gdansk, Poland
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Wed Jul 03, 2013 1:35 pm

I'll give my vote, this is most common used tool by me, and having it on CCR sitting in core would be more than appreciated.
 
LeoCombes
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 3:56 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Fri Jul 05, 2013 1:32 am

+1!
 
User avatar
Cha0s
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 908
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 4:53 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Sat Jul 06, 2013 4:48 pm

+1 :)
 
voxframe
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 126
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 2:51 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Mon Jul 08, 2013 3:44 pm

+1 for MTR
 
User avatar
soulflyhigh
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 173
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:20 am

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Mon Aug 12, 2013 4:27 pm

What's new in 6.3rc1 (2013-Aug-09 11:56):

*) traceroute - added mtr like pinging;
*) fix queues - correct queue was not installed when last child removed;
*) fix simple queues - sometimes some simple queues would stop working after configuration changes;
*) console - fixed issue with local variables having non-empty value
before first assignment;
*) console - fixed command ":global name" without second argument to not
create or change global variable "name", only effect is to make "name"
refer to global variable.
*) console - fixed passing local variables as argument to function;


THANK YOU!!!!!!!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
MTCRE, MTCTCE
 
HaPe
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:24 pm
Location: Poland

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:30 pm

Is it a joke?
In anticipation on new The Dude release.
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8319
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:34 pm

nope, it's official and is available for beta-testers :)
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
HaPe
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:24 pm
Location: Poland

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:35 pm

I will make a test on rb750. MTR works under CLI?
What does it mean Std.Dev column?
In anticipation on new The Dude release.
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8319
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:43 pm

yep, works fine, just without graphs:
[admin@TestPlace] > tool traceroute 8.8.8.8 
 # ADDRESS                          LOSS SENT    LAST     AVG    BEST   WORST STD-DEV MPLS                                                                        
 1 192.168.200.250                    0%   17   0.1ms     0.2     0.1     0.4       0
 2 10.25.1.1                          0%   17     2ms     1.7     1.3     3.4     0.5
 3 192.168.0.201                      0%   17     1ms     0.6     0.2       1     0.2
 4 172.20.0.30                        0%   17   0.6ms     0.9     0.4     1.8     0.4
 5 212.98.161.197                     0%   17   1.6ms     1.4     0.9       2     0.2
 6 86.57.252.38                       0%   17   1.7ms    14.5     1.1   166.9    39.8
 7 93.85.80.137                       0%   17   5.7ms     6.2       2     9.7     2.3
 8 93.85.80.102                       0%   17   1.8ms     1.7     1.2     2.4     0.4
 9 80.81.193.108                      0%   17  28.7ms    28.1    27.4      29     0.4
10 72.14.238.46                       0%   17  29.8ms    33.7      29    57.7     8.8
11 209.85.251.180                     0%   17    29ms    29.4    28.5    30.9     0.7
12 209.85.254.112                     0%   17  29.7ms    30.4    29.5    34.2       1
13                                  100%   17 timeout
14 8.8.8.8                            0%   17  29.4ms    29.8    29.2    30.5     0.4
-- [Q quit|D dump|C-z pause]
Std. Dev: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_deviation
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
oriondotnet
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 9:27 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Mon Aug 12, 2013 7:27 pm

+10 for MTR

Thanks for listening..
 
HaPe
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 10:24 pm
Location: Poland

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Mon Aug 12, 2013 7:31 pm

It is this same what jitter?
In anticipation on new The Dude release.
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8319
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Tue Aug 13, 2013 1:23 am

It is this same what jitter?
RFC 3393 says "The variation in packet delay is sometimes called "jitter". This term, however, causes confusion because it is used in different ways by different groups of people."

so, Std. Dev is exact mathematical expression of what's happening with delays :)
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
eflanery
Member
Member
Posts: 382
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 10:11 pm
Location: Moscow, ID
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:56 pm

Awesome!

Thanks guys!

--Eric
 
eflanery
Member
Member
Posts: 382
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 10:11 pm
Location: Moscow, ID
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Tue Aug 27, 2013 11:56 pm

So, while this is awesome, there does seem to be a bit of a glitch when running from the command line (particularly when telneting from a DOS window), where the MPLS label column doesn't show. This will make certain troubleshooting tricky in certain circumstances.

Would it be possible to ensure that all columns are always displayed?

And/or, make the mtr-style traceroute optional?

Perhaps call it something like '/tool traceping' (or whatever), and restore the old '/tool traceroute' functionality?

Or perhaps make it an option, perhaps like this: '/tool traceroute w.x.y.z mtr-style=yes' (or similar)?

Thanks,
--Eric
 
eflanery
Member
Member
Posts: 382
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 10:11 pm
Location: Moscow, ID
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Wed Aug 28, 2013 6:10 pm

Yikes.

It seems that in the latest build, MPLS labels are entirely missing from /tool traceroute, both on the CLI and in WinBox. Not good.

Please restore that functionality, it's really very important for us!

Thanks,
--Eric
 
User avatar
maximan
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 549
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 12:10 am
Location: Rio Cuarto, Argentina
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Wed Aug 28, 2013 6:18 pm

ready on v6.3!!

M.
MKE Solutions > Professional Support IT (Spanish / English)
FastNetMon / FNM Manager: DDoS Detection Tools.
 
doush
Long time Member
Long time Member
Topic Author
Posts: 625
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 3:11 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Thu Aug 29, 2013 11:35 am

Thanks MT for implementing the mtr by listening to your users.

When I first created this thread, my intention was not to replace the traceroute but to have an additional tool or an option for /tool trace for mtr like functionality.

I hope we will not loose the regular traceroute.
 
User avatar
Campano
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 2:35 am
Location: Ñuñoa - Chile
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Thu Aug 29, 2013 10:59 pm

Its amazing! For a long time this request has been requested for a many users, great work with this add.
 
eflanery
Member
Member
Posts: 382
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 10:11 pm
Location: Moscow, ID
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Wed Sep 04, 2013 8:59 pm

Yikes.

It seems that in the latest build, MPLS labels are entirely missing from /tool traceroute, both on the CLI and in WinBox. Not good.

Please restore that functionality, it's really very important for us!

Thanks,
--Eric
I can confirm that this is fixed in the 6.3 release version. Thanks guys!

I'd still like to see both the MTR-like and the traditional traceroute available, either as separate tools, or as an option.

Thanks,
--Eric
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8319
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Thu Sep 05, 2013 1:56 am

I'd still like to see both the MTR-like and the traditional traceroute available, either as separate tools, or as an option.
yep, just like ping: "count=1" for use non-interactively in scripts or something :)
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
odge
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 102
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 2:53 pm

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:47 am

Thank you thank you thank you
 
mxmxmxmxmx
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 69
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 1:27 am

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Thu Oct 10, 2013 1:01 pm

Colour logic is taken from signal strenght from quickset :)
It should be inverted :) green is better than orange in MTR
 
User avatar
Hammy
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 737
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 5:53 pm
Location: DeKalb, IL
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Sat Mar 29, 2014 7:02 pm

Another vote for adding MTR.
-----
Mike Hammett

The Brothers WISP
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8319
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Mon Mar 31, 2014 3:50 am

Another vote for adding MTR.
have you read previous posts or use current version? it's already here for half a year, from v6.3!
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
User avatar
Hammy
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 737
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 5:53 pm
Location: DeKalb, IL
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Mon Mar 31, 2014 6:32 am

Another vote for adding MTR.
have you read previous posts or use current version? it's already here for half a year, from v6.3!
I don't consider ROS stable until at least x.15. ;-)
-----
Mike Hammett

The Brothers WISP
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8319
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: Feature Request: MTR

Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:48 pm

I don't consider ROS stable until at least x.15. ;-)
that's your personal problem. I'm just stating that MTR was already added ;)

Image
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 102 guests