Community discussions

 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24206
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Fri Sep 21, 2012 12:05 pm

*RouterOS v6 release candidate 1 has been released*

v6 has many new features, among them:

- Doubles performance for Simple Queues
- New kernel and drivers
- Increases multicore system performance 25% or more
- Increases single core performance 10% or more
- High speed configuration for filters, scripting and other features


What's new in 6.0rc1 (2012-Sep-20 13:13):
*) i386 - increased number of supported cores to 64;
*) userman - fix unpaid profile activation while authenticating;
*) dhcp client - custom options;
*) dhcp options - allow mixing different data types;
*) console - "export compact" now is the default, use "export verbose" to get
previous behaviour;
*) ntp - make it work again;
*) tftpd - if real-file is a existing directory then prefix request with it;
*) RB333 ethernets are back;
*) dns - rotate servers only on failure;
Download it from here: http://www.mikrotik.com/download

To see how much the speed is increased in RouterOS v6, check our our new RB1100AHx2 tests, done on professional testing equiment: http://routerboard.com/RB1100AHx2 (page bottom)

Regards,
MikroTik
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
ayufan
Member
Member
Posts: 331
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:35 pm
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Fri Sep 21, 2012 12:10 pm

Is usb sharing working?
hAP AC, TP-Link Archer C7 v2, RB951G, RB450G, RPI2, RPI zero
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24206
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:48 pm

Is usb sharing working?
I'm sorry to say that final version of RouterOS v6 will not include this feature, as the drivers we tried to use, did not meet our quality standards, and it is a bit too late to write our own implementation from scratch.
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
ste
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1805
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 11:21 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Fri Sep 21, 2012 3:22 pm

> Increases single core performance 10% or more
Will this help older boards (133c3). We did not get them all replaced as
customers are lazy climing up.
Or will we get a problem with memory usage?
 
ffernandes
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:20 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Fri Sep 21, 2012 3:57 pm

i'm seeing some rx drops in my bridge ap

file attach ...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
Kadafi
newbie
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 5:52 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Fri Sep 21, 2012 4:52 pm

http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=49943
What about COA support? Any changes?
 
0ldman
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1446
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 5:01 am

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Fri Sep 21, 2012 5:21 pm

Updated my test/office AP from 5.20 to 6rc1, just a simple bridged AP, RB411AR + R52n. It lost my IP address and default route.

Took about 3 seconds to log in and put it back, but this could be a major issue if it happens somewhere else.
 
kapode3
just joined
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 5:28 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Fri Sep 21, 2012 5:27 pm

After adding in simple queue a time to be active = SQ is going invalid.

EXAMPLE. Different is only in time. Hours BEFORE 3PM ale not known by mikrotik :D



[admin@____TEST____] /queue simple> print
Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic
0 I name="24234" target=5.5.5.5/32 parent=none packet-marks="" priority=8/8 queue=default-small/default-small limit-at=0/0 max-limit=0/0 burst-limit=0/0 burst-threshold=0/0
burst-time=0s/0s time=1s-12h53m58s,sun,mon,tue,wed,thu,fri,sat

1 name="24234_2" target=5.5.5.5/32 parent=none packet-marks="" priority=8/8 queue=default-small/default-small limit-at=0/0 max-limit=0/0 burst-limit=0/0 burst-threshold=0/0
burst-time=0s/0s time=1s-17h53m58s,sun,mon,tue,wed,thu,fri,sat
 
slech
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 533
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:03 pm
Location: Moldova, Chisinau

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:49 pm

Backup size:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
sorry for my english
 
slech
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 533
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:03 pm
Location: Moldova, Chisinau

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Fri Sep 21, 2012 10:37 pm

system backup save name=6.0RC1
Saving system configuration
Failed to save system configuration backup
action timed out - try again, if error continues contact MikroTik support and send
a supout file (13)
sorry for my english
 
panteraboy
just joined
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: Romania

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Sat Sep 22, 2012 12:12 am

On RB 750:
jan/02/1970 02:00:14 system,error,critical System rebooted because of kernel fai
lure
jan/02/1970 02:00:14 system,error,critical router was rebooted without proper sh
utdown

Reboot only on winbox and cpu is 100%
RB750, RB433AH, RB2011RM
 
Ascii
newbie
Posts: 32
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 11:15 pm
Location: Quito, Ecuador

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Sat Sep 22, 2012 1:16 am

any news about the new routing package?
 
DonGould
newbie
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 7:50 am

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Sat Sep 22, 2012 1:38 am

Is usb sharing working?
I'm sorry to say that final version of RouterOS v6 will not include this feature, as the drivers we tried to use, did not meet our quality standards, and it is a bit too late to write our own implementation from scratch.
Bugger, because this is a feature I'm waiting to be working.

This would make the 751 a real consumer option for me.

D
New to RB750G - 1 Jan 2011 - so be nice and sorry for the idiot questions, I'll do my best to read the wiki if you just point me to the right pages. :)
 
User avatar
Ultanium
newbie
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 7:57 pm
Location: Houston, Texas
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Sat Sep 22, 2012 6:44 am

I tested it on a 750 and a 532, seems to be a lot less cpu intensive. Haven't tried the backup yet to see the issue listed above. Hope we can use this on the box full of 133's we have! thank Normis, tell the guys to keep up the good work!! See you in Louisiana if I can get away.

Tommy
 
User avatar
nz_monkey
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1818
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:53 pm
Location: Straya
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Sat Sep 22, 2012 7:40 am

any news about the new routing package?
I am interested in this too.
http://thebrotherswisp.com/ | Mikrotik MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCINE | Fortinet FTCNA, FCNSP, FCT | Extreme Networks ENA
 
rjickity
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 212
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:40 am
Location: Perth, Australia

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Sat Sep 22, 2012 8:38 am

Is mikrotik going to update all the documentation for their devices with ROS 6 throughput data when its final?

Also could we get the new products in your comparison matrix ?
http://routerboard.com/pdf/RouterBOARD_ ... arison.pdf

edit: i see they have updated the throughput results already for RB1100AHx2
http://routerboard.com/RB1100AHx2
Last edited by rjickity on Sat Sep 22, 2012 12:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.
 
TKITFrank
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 236
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:55 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Sat Sep 22, 2012 12:43 pm

Todays buglist.

1) IPv6 Firewall filter not working again.
2) IPv6 Firewall statistics not working. Show thousends of Gigabyte of data on the rules.
MTCNA

"I don't believe UNIX is Utopia. It's just the best set of tools around."
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Worldwide
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Sat Sep 22, 2012 1:13 pm

rx drops - what are we counting here ? frames not destined to our mac address ? frames with crc problems ? I get quote some of these but ping is going without loss (RB450G HW Rev 2009-ish Eth5)
wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NetworkPro_on_Quality_of_Service
 
net365
newbie
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 5:17 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Sat Sep 22, 2012 1:19 pm

Any idea when IPv6 Hotspot will be created?

Thanks. Jon
 
mhugo
newbie
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 11:48 am

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:37 pm

DHCP client is working like 25% of the time even on factory reset unit with only dhcp client enabled on ether1 on 750G
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Worldwide
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:43 am

mhugo, with changed MAC or default MAC ? do you see the gateway's MAC in the arp table? What happens if you add it there manually? Thanks.
wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NetworkPro_on_Quality_of_Service
 
ffernandes
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:20 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:19 am

no one knows the rx drops thing?! i'm seeing it in the bridge......
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Worldwide
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Sun Sep 23, 2012 8:53 am

When the sniffer is Running on that interface - in my case RB450G eth5 - the rx drops are not counted - probably the interface is not in promiscuous mode by default and the counter counts every frame not for itself.
wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NetworkPro_on_Quality_of_Service
 
User avatar
Boter
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 9:55 pm
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:08 pm

Just installed on my SXT5 and RB751G-2HnD :) We'll see what happens
 
mars
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 228
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 1:43 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Sun Sep 23, 2012 5:49 pm

Hi
why is it when upgrading a rb to any of the ros 6 versions the rb must be power cycled after getting stuck after the upgrade to work properly
 
User avatar
Xymox
Member
Member
Posts: 387
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 5:04 pm
Location: Phoenix, Arizona US
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Sun Sep 23, 2012 7:52 pm

To upgrade my RB450G I just dragged over the NPK on top of 5.20. Rebooted and all was well. No need to power cycle for me. Everybody remember to upgrade your firmware too.

So far on my SOHO config no issues. NTP is working.
 
mars
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 228
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 1:43 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:23 am

downgrading on a rb411 to ros 5.20 makes cpu stay on 100%
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Worldwide
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:44 am

yes I can imagine downgrading is not perfect at all and when I was trying different non-final versions in the past I have learned that best is to NetInstall clean after format and expect stability then :)

If the version is official release - I had success with upgrading and downgrading by just uploading npks remotely. 8)
wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NetworkPro_on_Quality_of_Service
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24206
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:51 am

Todays buglist.

1) IPv6 Firewall filter not working again.
2) IPv6 Firewall statistics not working. Show thousends of Gigabyte of data on the rules.
Please send us a supout.rif file with your rules
For God sake go fix your old issues before coming up with something new !
Please clarify which old issues are your priorities. Have fixed many issues in this release, but please be more specific which issues you are facing
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5934
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Mon Sep 24, 2012 12:08 pm

downgrading on a rb411 to ros 5.20 makes cpu stay on 100%
This is LCD related, you will be able to downgrade to v5.21 without issues.
 
TKITFrank
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 236
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:55 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Mon Sep 24, 2012 1:10 pm

Todays buglist.

1) IPv6 Firewall filter not working again.
2) IPv6 Firewall statistics not working. Show thousends of Gigabyte of data on the rules.
Please send us a supout.rif file with your rules
For God sake go fix your old issues before coming up with something new !
Please clarify which old issues are your priorities. Have fixed many issues in this release, but please be more specific which issues you are facing
Hi Normis,
See [Ticket#2012092466000445]
MTCNA

"I don't believe UNIX is Utopia. It's just the best set of tools around."
 
User avatar
kolorasta
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 298
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 11:55 pm
Location: Argentina

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Mon Sep 24, 2012 9:26 pm

After adding in simple queue a time to be active = SQ is going invalid.

EXAMPLE. Different is only in time. Hours BEFORE 3PM ale not known by mikrotik :D



[admin@____TEST____] /queue simple> print
Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic
0 I name="24234" target=5.5.5.5/32 parent=none packet-marks="" priority=8/8 queue=default-small/default-small limit-at=0/0 max-limit=0/0 burst-limit=0/0 burst-threshold=0/0
burst-time=0s/0s time=1s-12h53m58s,sun,mon,tue,wed,thu,fri,sat

1 name="24234_2" target=5.5.5.5/32 parent=none packet-marks="" priority=8/8 queue=default-small/default-small limit-at=0/0 max-limit=0/0 burst-limit=0/0 burst-threshold=0/0
burst-time=0s/0s time=1s-17h53m58s,sun,mon,tue,wed,thu,fri,sat
same problem here... simple queue with time gets invalid... i remove time condition...gets valid
 
User avatar
kolorasta
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 298
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 11:55 pm
Location: Argentina

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:44 pm

maybe i'm wrong but i think if we want a powerful multicore system with ROS6 we will have to wait for Cloud Core Router...

we have to forget about x86 systems

i tried ros5 with several multicore systems (amd and intel) and i have problems with all of them. ros6 i could never make it work with x86.
 
balintos
just joined
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:00 am
Location: Hungary, Bekescsaba

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Mon Sep 24, 2012 11:34 pm

I have problems with RB450G-I use this script ran correctly before ROS5.18 case, but it is not ROS6.0 sending wol commands.

Another problem is that dude 3.6 ran flawlessly before the board, but not now. System/packages in, but dude client does not open it.

: (
 
roadracer96
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 714
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 12:01 am

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:12 am

IPv6 seems to stop working after upgrading from 5.20 to 6rc1. Downgrade made it all work fine again. RB1100, RB1100AH, rb2011
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Worldwide
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:16 am

Some stuff you have to see if enabled as packages and reconfigure I think.
wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NetworkPro_on_Quality_of_Service
 
roadracer96
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 714
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 12:01 am

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:37 am

Packages were enabled. Config was there. Im pretty sure it worked when I tested out 6.0b3 (Stopped using it for other reasons). Tried doing the ol edit save
 
mirhav
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:29 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Tue Sep 25, 2012 1:33 am

I have problem with errors on my Intel Fiber NICs in version 6, NIC failed to working - some errors on RX and TX - on cisco switch i can see colision errors on interface. - ospf on this L3 interface disconect peers.

after downgrade to version 5.XX problem resolved.

tested on two servers, one with pcie fibre nic, one with intel onboard nic - diferent vendor - same problem

Mirek
mirek@gsnet.cz
 
User avatar
sergejs
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 6615
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 3:33 pm
Location: Riga, Latvia
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Tue Sep 25, 2012 10:37 am

Mirek, please provide us with detailed information about the card model, that does not work properly at v6.0rc1.
Thank you for the information.
 
User avatar
sergejs
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 6615
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 3:33 pm
Location: Riga, Latvia
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:54 pm

kapode3 and kolorasta, please check the clock of your router.
queue is invalid during the time that is not in configured range, as soon as queue is back to the range state is changed to black.

roadracer96, please provide us with more detailed description about IPv6 problems at v6.x

balintos You should post your script here and then we can see where is the problem.

TKITFrank We are working on the problem with firewall IPv6 rules and statistic.

slech Please send us /export compact from your router, we will try to see what is the reason for such backups.
I have tried on RB4xx/RB11xx and x86, backup files were in normal range.

panteraboy Please contact support with attached support output file, that is generated after the kernel panic.

ffernandes Please make sure there is no problems on layer2 network at your setup (broken card, wire, etc.).
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Worldwide
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Tue Sep 25, 2012 1:28 pm

Anyone losing and having to restart the routerboard when playing with arp entries (not of the IP we are connected from) ?
wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NetworkPro_on_Quality_of_Service
 
ffernandes
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:20 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Tue Sep 25, 2012 3:06 pm

ffernandes Please make sure there is no problems on layer2 network at your setup (broken card, wire, etc.).[/quote]

there was no problem with v5.20 .....
this rx drops only appeard in the 6.0rc1.......
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Worldwide
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Tue Sep 25, 2012 3:54 pm

There is no problem on mine as well. As I said - when I turn on the sniffer - rx drops are not counted.

MT guys If you want - I will give you access to upload your debug stuff and do whatever you want (without killing the hardware) with the RB.
wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NetworkPro_on_Quality_of_Service
 
User avatar
sergejs
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 6615
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 3:33 pm
Location: Riga, Latvia
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Tue Sep 25, 2012 4:20 pm

NetworkPro yes, remote access can help us.
Please provide us with remote access to your router and give us step by step instructions, how we can repeat the same problem.
 
wispwest
Member
Member
Posts: 477
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 3:48 am

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:09 pm

Normis,

All Simple Queues IP addresses STILL does not apply to RC1!! All queues IP 0.0.0.0/0

Is it that hard of a bug to fix????? I really want to try this out, due to the increased queue performance, but I have 300-400 queues with lost IP addresses now!
 
bkbbkb
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 8:07 am

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:12 pm

I have tried 6.0rc1 on 750G.
DHCP client failed to get IP address from Incognito DHCP server (DOCSIS line).

Downgrade back to 5.20 solves the issue.
(100% CPU issue was resolved by restoring from backup)
 
balintos
just joined
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:00 am
Location: Hungary, Bekescsaba

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Tue Sep 25, 2012 9:45 pm

Sergejs: This is the script 'wol tool mac = 00:50:8 D: 7C: 49: D1 = ether4 interface ", but it turns out it was another problem (power supply).
THX
 
moly
newbie
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 3:14 pm
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Wed Sep 26, 2012 9:13 am

Router HW : Gigabyte EP45-DS4 , CPU Q9550 , 2G RAM , 2x Intel dual port NIC , 2x intrgrated realtec NIC
IMAG0360.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Martin Cerny
chairman of Oslavany.NET
 
linek1980
newbie
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 1:39 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Wed Sep 26, 2012 9:40 am

when :

mode : bridge

supported-rates-a/g= 6Mbps,9Mbps,12Mbps,18Mbps,24Mbps,36Mbps,48Mbps,54Mbps
wireless-protocol=802.11


station wds

supported-rates-a/g=48Mbps,54Mbps

link does not work

same but : wireless-protocol=nv2 - link work

and

mode : bridge

supported-rates-a/g= 6Mbps,9Mbps,12Mbps,18Mbps,24Mbps,36Mbps,48Mbps,54Mbps (default)
wireless-protocol=802.11

station wds:
supported-rates-a/g= 6Mbps,9Mbps,12Mbps,18Mbps,24Mbps,36Mbps,48Mbps,54Mbps (default)
wireless-protocol=802.11

link work witch 54Mbs
 
sonny
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 208
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 5:14 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Wed Sep 26, 2012 2:40 pm

Hi,
exported script from simplequeues (Version 5.20) cannot be imported.

[admin@RSB-3GHZ-Test-AP] > import QueueBeu.rsc
Opening script file QueueBeu.rsc

Script file loaded successfullyexpected end of command (line 5 column 58
)
Karl Sonnleitner
Senior Wireless-Expert
Restlesspowerbox - managed powersupply for Routerboards
 
User avatar
paka
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 4:25 pm
Location: Bonn, Germany
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Wed Sep 26, 2012 2:59 pm

Hi Normis,

* The User Manager shows some wrong values on GUI. This problem exists since v4.6, until now is not resolved.
Some information is missing on "sessions" table. (see files)
* The informations on GUI are not updated, when i click "F5", only after log off or after restart ros.

Thanks in advance
GUI_Error_01_Users.JPG
GUI_Error_02_Sessions.JPG
GUI_Error_03_Logs.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
paka
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 4:25 pm
Location: Bonn, Germany
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Wed Sep 26, 2012 3:01 pm

Here continuation ...
GUI_Error_04_Payments.JPG
GUI_Error_04_Payments.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by paka on Thu Sep 27, 2012 11:56 am, edited 2 times in total.
 
User avatar
rmmccann
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 182
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:15 pm
Location: USA

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Wed Sep 26, 2012 7:14 pm

Can anyone confirm if hairpin NAT is functional in 6.0rc1? My implementation (per the Wiki) was fully functional in 5.19, however it no longer works in 6.0rc1.
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools. --Douglas Adams
 
0ldman
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1446
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 5:01 am

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Wed Sep 26, 2012 11:46 pm

100% CPU usage with nothing going on. Downgraded to 5.20, same problem, wasn't doing it before the update to RC1.

Downgrade to 5.17 and it works fine.
 
User avatar
TrollMan
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 9:25 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Thu Sep 27, 2012 11:06 am

Shouldn't this release be called beta4? I cant understand the point of releasing a RC1 with so many bugs. When I release SW a RC release is meant to go to production and there should be really no issues found. Only in rare cases will a showstopper be found and a RC2 release be done. I dont work with router software but here I thought it was even more important that the SW for a RC would be of a high quality level.
 
proximus
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 1:46 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Thu Sep 27, 2012 4:50 pm

On RB 750:
jan/02/1970 02:00:14 system,error,critical System rebooted because of kernel fai
lure
jan/02/1970 02:00:14 system,error,critical router was rebooted without proper sh
utdown
I have experienced the same failure on a RB750GL.

autosupout.rif sent to support.
 
User avatar
LZiX
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 8:33 pm
Location: Kazakhstan

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Fri Sep 28, 2012 7:36 pm

downgrading on a rb411 to ros 5.20 makes cpu stay on 100%
+1
I reset it to fix this issue and reconfigure our 411AH
 
User avatar
paka
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 4:25 pm
Location: Bonn, Germany
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:23 pm

Hello Normis,

is there any solution for GUI bug of UM?

Thanks in advance
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8308
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Sun Sep 30, 2012 4:36 pm

All Simple Queues IP addresses STILL does not apply to RC1!! All queues IP 0.0.0.0/0

Is it that hard of a bug to fix????? I really want to try this out, due to the increased queue performance, but I have 300-400 queues with lost IP addresses now!
why not just export queues config, do upgrade, delete queues and import config back?..
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
User avatar
otgooneo
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 570
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 3:24 am
Location: Mongolia
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Sun Sep 30, 2012 6:44 pm

Did someone test RC1 with 1000 pppoe clients, queue tree and 1000 simple pppoe queues? Last time I have tried to decrease my router CPU usage installing new 6.0beta1 with this live router, but not success. Router restarted few time when pppoe clients reached 400.
If someone did this kind of test please let me know. Thank you.
----------------------------
Want to learn more and more...
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Worldwide
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Tue Oct 02, 2012 7:54 am

Last night I lost 2 hours before I realised that NetInstall does not work on Windows 8 (rather XP).

This is exactly the sort of thing that can get frustrated users running around and complaining. It is very easy to get the users in this mode especially when they are used to things just working like what the rest of the IT industry tries to sell them.

But I am hardcore and I drank a glass of cold water and I am back online with a fresh install of 6 "RC1" to discover wonderful new bugs.
wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NetworkPro_on_Quality_of_Service
 
User avatar
janisk
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 6283
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 9:46 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:32 am

care to share some details about what you tried and how exactly it did not work?
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24206
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:38 am

Last night I lost 2 hours before I realised that NetInstall does not work on Windows 8 (rather XP).

This is exactly the sort of thing that can get frustrated users running around and complaining. It is very easy to get the users in this mode especially when they are used to things just working like what the rest of the IT industry tries to sell them.

But I am hardcore and I drank a glass of cold water and I am back online with a fresh install of 6 "RC1" to discover wonderful new bugs.
works fine for us, on all windows versions. please clarify step by step how you tried to use it, and at which point it failed.
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
TKITFrank
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 236
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:55 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:46 am

Hi,

Any progress on Ticket#2012092466000445 ? :)
MTCNA

"I don't believe UNIX is Utopia. It's just the best set of tools around."
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Worldwide
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:48 am

RB450G 2009-ish hw rev., bootloader 2.41/latest with its config - reset and over-clocked to 800 (active cooling) RB is powered by 12 volt ATX PSU

I ran NetInstall.exe as Administrator , turned On the NetBoot option, I put in an IP address that is within the subnet that I have on the NIC TCP/IPv4 conifg.

The RouterBOARD finds the NetBoot and waits for the RouterOS to come in. On the serial console I see a message about pressing Ctr-Alt-Del which does not make sense - please fix it? :)

On Windows 8 NetInstall I select the RB and click Install it starts sending packets and stops after 5-6 small udp packets.

I did the same on the other machine with the XP and it worked straight away, NetInstall found the RB waiting and I just had to select and hit Install.


Firewall: off
protocols and services on NIC: all off besides TCP/IP v4
cFosSpeed: off and services stopped (driver stopped and service stopped)
Tried two different NICs one Bcm 1000, one Rtl 100
MTU Settings: 1500
All available "offload" settings in Drivers Advanced page: ON
OS "offload" settings: turned On but not active according to netstat.

Wireshark showed packets going from around 76 bytes to 91 bytes and then the NetInstall fails without the packet size going up.

p.s. wait a second, you don't think the npf/winpcap could have caused this ..?

p.s. it could be because I tried to turn on chimney offload, I can test at some point when I want to donate the time ..


Now that the 6rc1 is clean installed the whole router seems more stable - only my ISP1 juniper does not appear easily in the arp table so I had to add it manually... (DHCP ...)
wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NetworkPro_on_Quality_of_Service
 
riggerman
newbie
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:27 pm
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1 - SIMPLE QUEUES

Thu Oct 04, 2012 2:12 am

Hi All,

Reading scrollback I see others also have issues with simple queues and time ranges. I can confirm that I HAVE checked my clock settings and there really IS an issue with simple queues and time ;-)

There's 2 issues that occur (one Mikrotik needs to fix ;-):

Issue that needs fixing 1st:
I have Clock configured for Time Zone Name: Africa/Johannesburg. This means +02:00. Lets say I want a queue to start at 01:08:00 in the morning. To get it to activate at the right time I must set the time on the queue to 23:08:00. This seems to indicate Mikrotik are comparing UTC with Queue time and forgetting the Offset.

2nd issue - I can live with:
What appears to happen is that the queue stays invalid for around 20 - 30 seconds "after" the time indicated on the queue start time ... so when we're testing it appears broken... I thought so too and was busy typing up my post to add to the chorus of complaints when I noticed it DOES become valid ... it just takes its sweet time...


Other queue related issues:
*) Cannot rename a queue. Create queue called "queue1" try to edit name and always end up with error "already have such name"
-- to contact me rather use my other account: "regardtv"
 
linek1980
newbie
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 1:39 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Thu Oct 04, 2012 9:07 am

where is quick set ? :)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
angboontiong
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1115
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 9:59 am

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:36 pm

Any good news for this on wireless part?
Can be RB411AH to provide 100/100 real TCP with No card ???
 
MimiFleX
newbie
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 2:36 pm
Location: France

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Fri Oct 05, 2012 1:02 pm

Strange behaviour with vlan and IP addresses :lol:
Bug or feature ? Mail+supout has been sent to support.

  MMM      MMM       KKK                          TTTTTTTTTTT      KKK
  MMMM    MMMM       KKK                          TTTTTTTTTTT      KKK
  MMM MMMM MMM  III  KKK  KKK  RRRRRR     OOOOOO      TTT     III  KKK  KKK
  MMM  MM  MMM  III  KKKKK     RRR  RRR  OOO  OOO     TTT     III  KKKKK
  MMM      MMM  III  KKK KKK   RRRRRR    OOO  OOO     TTT     III  KKK KKK
  MMM      MMM  III  KKK  KKK  RRR  RRR   OOOOOO      TTT     III  KKK  KKK

  MikroTik RouterOS 6.0rc1 (c) 1999-2012       http://www.mikrotik.com/

 
[admin@TOU1-CNR-X8G-2] > /interface vlan
[admin@TOU1-CNR-X8G-2] /interface vlan> pr
Flags: X - disabled, R - running, S - slave
 #    NAME                                                  MTU ARP        VLAN-ID INTERFACE                                              
[admin@TOU1-CNR-X8G-2] /interface vlan> add interface=ether1 vlan-id=10
[admin@TOU1-CNR-X8G-2] /interface vlan> pr
Flags: X - disabled, R - running, S - slave
 #    NAME                                                  MTU ARP        VLAN-ID INTERFACE                                              
 0 R  vlan1                                                1500 enabled         10 ether1                                                 
[admin@TOU1-CNR-X8G-2] /interface vlan> /ip address add address=192.168.10.1/24 interface=vlan1
[admin@TOU1-CNR-X8G-2] /interface vlan> /ip address pr
Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic
 #   ADDRESS            NETWORK         INTERFACE                                                                                         
 0   192.168.88.1/24    192.168.88.0    admin                                                                                             
 1   192.168.10.1/24    192.168.10.0    vlan1                                                                                             
[admin@TOU1-CNR-X8G-2] /interface vlan> pr
Flags: X - disabled, R - running, S - slave
 #    NAME                                                  MTU ARP        VLAN-ID INTERFACE                                              
 0 R  vlan1                                                1500 enabled         10 ether1                                                 
[admin@TOU1-CNR-X8G-2] /interface vlan> remove 0
[admin@TOU1-CNR-X8G-2] /interface vlan> pr
Flags: X - disabled, R - running, S - slave
 #    NAME                                                  MTU ARP        VLAN-ID INTERFACE                                              
[admin@TOU1-CNR-X8G-2] /interface vlan> /ip address pr
Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic
 #   ADDRESS            NETWORK         INTERFACE                                                                                         
 0   192.168.88.1/24    192.168.88.0    admin                                                                                             
 1 I 192.168.10.1/24    192.168.10.0    vlan1

## Huh ?! vlan1 doesn't exist anymore !                                                                                     

[admin@TOU1-CNR-X8G-2] /interface vlan> add interface=ether1 vlan-id=10
[admin@TOU1-CNR-X8G-2] /interface vlan> pr
Flags: X - disabled, R - running, S - slave
 #    NAME                                                  MTU ARP        VLAN-ID INTERFACE                                              
 0 R  vlan2                                                1500 enabled         10 ether1  

## Huh ?! seems that vlan1 still exists internaly as my new vlan is named vlan2 !
                                              
[admin@TOU1-CNR-X8G-2] /interface vlan> /ip address
[admin@TOU1-CNR-X8G-2] /ip address> pr
Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic
 #   ADDRESS            NETWORK         INTERFACE                                                                                         
 0   192.168.88.1/24    192.168.88.0    admin                                                                                             
 1   192.168.10.1/24    192.168.10.0    vlan2         

## Huh ?! I don't want that ! Well, let's try creating a vlan on other phy iface and other tag to see..
                                                                                   
[admin@TOU1-CNR-X8G-2] /ip address> /interface vlan
[admin@TOU1-CNR-X8G-2] /interface vlan> print
Flags: X - disabled, R - running, S - slave
 #    NAME                                                  MTU ARP        VLAN-ID INTERFACE                                              
 0 R  vlan2                                                1500 enabled         10 ether1                                                 
[admin@TOU1-CNR-X8G-2] /interface vlan> remove 0
[admin@TOU1-CNR-X8G-2] /interface vlan> pr
Flags: X - disabled, R - running, S - slave
 #    NAME                                                  MTU ARP        VLAN-ID INTERFACE                                              
[admin@TOU1-CNR-X8G-2] /interface vlan> add interface=ether4 vlan-id=150
## Note : now using ether4 instead of ether1 and using tag=150 instead of 10.


[admin@TOU1-CNR-X8G-2] /interface vlan> pr
Flags: X - disabled, R - running, S - slave
 #    NAME                                                  MTU ARP        VLAN-ID INTERFACE                                              
 0 R  vlan3                                                1500 enabled        150 ether4 

## Same here ! seems that vlan2 or vlan1 still exist.
                                               
[admin@TOU1-CNR-X8G-2] /interface vlan> /ip address
[admin@TOU1-CNR-X8G-2] /ip address> pr
Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic
 #   ADDRESS            NETWORK         INTERFACE                                                                                         
 0   192.168.88.1/24    192.168.88.0    admin                                                                                             
 1   192.168.10.1/24    192.168.10.0    vlan3      

## Hey ?! Why this IP address is automatically stucked to a new vlan ?                                                                                 

Here are the command lines to reproduce this behaviour :
/interface vlan
pr
add interface=ether1 vlan-id=10
pr
/ip address add address=192.168.10.1/24 interface=vlan1
/ip address pr
pr
remove 0
pr
/ip address pr
add interface=ether1 vlan-id=10
pr
/ip address
pr
/interface vlan
print
remove 0
pr
add interface=ether4 vlan-id=150
pr
/ip address
pr
 
User avatar
otgooneo
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 570
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 3:24 am
Location: Mongolia
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Fri Oct 05, 2012 1:54 pm

Strange behaviour with vlan and IP addresses :lol:
Bug or feature ? Mail+supout has been sent to support.
Great feature :lol:
----------------------------
Want to learn more and more...
 
User avatar
honzam
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2287
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:27 pm
Location: Czech Republic

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Fri Oct 05, 2012 3:29 pm

I see - demo is 6.0RC2.
MT team, can you give us some pre-release changelog?
I would like to help with testing but we need to know what has changed?

Do you think it's possible?
LAN, FTTx, Wireless. ISP operator
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24206
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Fri Oct 05, 2012 3:37 pm

I see - demo is 6.0RC2.
MT team, can you give us some pre-release changelog?
I would like to help with testing but we need to know what has changed?

Do you think it's possible?
Do you have access to pre-release testing page? if not, email support with your account name. Changelog is also there.
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
wispwest
Member
Member
Posts: 477
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 3:48 am

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:57 am

All Simple Queues IP addresses STILL does not apply to RC1!! All queues IP 0.0.0.0/0

Is it that hard of a bug to fix????? I really want to try this out, due to the increased queue performance, but I have 300-400 queues with lost IP addresses now!
why not just export queues config, do upgrade, delete queues and import config back?..
I have about 50 Mikrotik's with over 100 queues, that I would upgrade. Can't Mikrotik just fix the simple queue issue? Simple queue management is taking up 70% CPU on some of my Mikrotiks now, REALLY would be nice to test out 6.0!!
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Worldwide
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Sat Oct 06, 2012 11:11 am

http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... 6.0rc2.npk do not use this version as if something breaks there would be the person who installed it to blame. Its not released at all.

unpredicted behaviour report: with arp disabled and a static arp entry in place, dhcp client does not work properly because the static arp entry is red, invalid ?

cool new thing I like: traffic generator

cool new thing 2: Starting from v6.0rc2 default connection-tracking value is auto. Which means that connection tracking is disabled until at least one firewall rule is added.

problem: my mouse is set to high speed and when I doubleclick on the simple queue - log says it was moved and the queue stops working every time it gets moved. even though it is moved to the same place it was - only queue in there.

Can we please make WinBox not Move stuff when doubleclicked and the queue not stop working when "moved" to the same place?

Thanks.
Last edited by NetworkPro on Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NetworkPro_on_Quality_of_Service
 
jandafields
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1514
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 6:12 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:49 pm

Last night I lost 2 hours before I realised that NetInstall does not work on Windows 8 (rather XP).

This is exactly the sort of thing that can get frustrated users running around and complaining. It is very easy to get the users in this mode especially when they are used to things just working like what the rest of the IT industry tries to sell them.

But I am hardcore and I drank a glass of cold water and I am back online with a fresh install of 6 "RC1" to discover wonderful new bugs.
NetInstall works fine on Windows 8! You just need to do the same troubleshooting that you would do for Windows 7.
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Worldwide
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:08 pm

Which is? I tried with Compatibility mode.
wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NetworkPro_on_Quality_of_Service
 
jandafields
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1514
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 6:12 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:37 pm

Which is? I tried with Compatibility mode.
It works fine for me. See screenshot. No compatibility mode, nothing special. Just double-click on it. The first time it runs, the firewall option pops up. Just tell it to allow communication on the private AND public network.

That's it. If it doesn't work, then either you have a Virtual Box adapter installed... or your firewall isn't set properly... or your computer IP address is wrong... or the net booting in NetInstall isn't enabled or set to the right IP address.

SCREENSHOT BELOW.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Worldwide
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:48 pm

I have a VMware thing installed.
wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NetworkPro_on_Quality_of_Service
 
jandafields
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1514
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 6:12 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:49 pm

Sorry, wrong picture was attached. See the following picture to see the successful NetInstall AFTER it installed to the device:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
janisk
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 6283
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 9:46 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Tue Oct 09, 2012 8:46 am

just to check - have you set "net booting" ip address that netinstalled system will get to install over network?
 
User avatar
NetworkPro
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: Worldwide
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Tue Oct 09, 2012 9:18 am

Yes I did do that. That part worked. It was the later step that failed when I click Install.
wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NetworkPro_on_Quality_of_Service
 
jandafields
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1514
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 6:12 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Tue Oct 09, 2012 3:31 pm

I have a VMware thing installed.
I do't use VMWare, but when I have a Virtual Box network adapter... it won't even detect routers with the Winbox Login Dropdown. Delete the Virtual Box adapter, and all works fine.

You might try deleting the VMWare network adapter and make sure it isn't selected within the physical adapter's properties as well.
 
User avatar
janisk
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 6283
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 9:46 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Wed Oct 10, 2012 3:27 pm

if router is already found by netinstall and only fail when install is pressed - bight be problem with windows firewall not passing tftp data through when packets are transferred to router.
 
jandafields
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1514
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 6:12 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Wed Oct 10, 2012 7:38 pm

Firewall: off
 
linek1980
newbie
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 1:39 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Fri Oct 12, 2012 1:38 pm

ROS 6.0RC2 version from yesterday
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
uldis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 3425
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 2:55 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Fri Oct 12, 2012 4:58 pm

please redownload the RouterOs v6.0rc2 - we made a new build. If in that version the wireless still uses 100% please make a support output file and send that to support@mikrotik.com
 
linek1980
newbie
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 1:39 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:39 pm

<font><font>proszę ponownie pobrać RouterOS v6.0rc2 - zrobiliśmy nowy build. </font><font>Jeśli w tej wersji bezprzewodowej nadal używa 100% prosimy o plik wyjściowy wsparcia i wysłać, do support@mikrotik.com</font></font>

Now looks good :D

////////////////////edit///////////

if AP ROS6.02rc2 - CPE ROS 6.0rc1 and wireles protocol NV2, PtMP - constantly disconnects
if AP ROS6.02rc2 - CPE ROS 6.0cr2 and wireles protocol NV2, PtMP - works better but still :
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
saaremaa
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 156
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 7:48 pm
Location: Baltijos šalių miestas

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Mon Oct 15, 2012 12:02 am

I need of CoA on PPPoE! This is the right solution to manage PPPoE users than SSH.
CMDR Saaremaa (Gutamaya Sierra Alpha Alpha)
 
User avatar
nz_monkey
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1818
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:53 pm
Location: Straya
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Mon Oct 15, 2012 2:47 am

I need of CoA on PPPoE! This is the right solution to manage PPPoE users than SSH.
You and everyone else !
http://thebrotherswisp.com/ | Mikrotik MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCINE | Fortinet FTCNA, FCNSP, FCT | Extreme Networks ENA
 
User avatar
otgooneo
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 570
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 3:24 am
Location: Mongolia
Contact:

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Mon Oct 15, 2012 7:09 am

I need of CoA on PPPoE! This is the right solution to manage PPPoE users than SSH.
+1 like
----------------------------
Want to learn more and more...
 
rado3105
Member
Member
Posts: 480
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Wed Oct 17, 2012 6:29 pm

maybe i'm wrong but i think if we want a powerful multicore system with ROS6 we will have to wait for Cloud Core Router...

we have to forget about x86 systems

i tried ros5 with several multicore systems (amd and intel) and i have problems with all of them. ros6 i could never make it work with x86.
I run ros v5.20 on intel dn2800mt, it works like a charm....with intel pci-express network card....
 
sattva
just joined
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:00 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:12 pm

Image[/url]

please help! how to free up disk space?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
rado3105
Member
Member
Posts: 480
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Thu Oct 18, 2012 10:17 pm

v6 rc2 on rb2011(fastpath - just routing, dhcp-server) without problems(upgrade and everything), upgraded from 5.21, consumes much less cpu....
 
challado
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:53 am

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Fri Oct 19, 2012 2:39 pm

ffernandes Please make sure there is no problems on layer2 network at your setup (broken card, wire, etc.).

there was no problem with v5.20 .....
this rx drops only appeard in the 6.0rc1.......
Same problem with me. I Already sended a supout.rif file to support.mikrotik.com. That's is the answer.
Hello,

I did not find any specific problem but we are working to fix some x86 ethernet
controller issues in version 6. Currently, you should downgrade back to v5.xx
 
mars
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 228
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 1:43 pm

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Sun Oct 21, 2012 6:33 pm

after downgrading from ros 6rc2 to ros 5.21 backup file is now 5.3meg
also most of the packages was missing and no routing
why is this
 
bunlim
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 6:39 am

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Mon Oct 22, 2012 6:48 am

RouterOS v6rc1 can not downgrade to v5 on RB750, Please help
RouterOS v6rc1 have problem with simple queues!
 
jcem
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 4:41 pm
Location: Grebbestad, Sweden

Re: RouterOS v6 release candidate 1

Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:11 pm

Is usb sharing working?
I'm sorry to say that final version of RouterOS v6 will not include this feature, as the drivers we tried to use, did not meet our quality standards, and it is a bit too late to write our own implementation from scratch.
Hi!

Any chance this feature will be available?

RGDS
Jörgen

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSN [Bot] and 99 guests