Community discussions

MUM Europe 2020
 
rastod
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 122
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 11:35 pm
Location: Slovakia

CCQ on wireless-test

Sun Feb 05, 2006 10:30 pm

Hi all,

I noticed that CCQ value on wireless interface si much higher when using wireless-test package. Why?

Before enabling wireless-test I had valuses about 10-20%, now I have over 60%-90%
 
cibernet
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 610
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 7:22 pm
Location: Marcos Juárez, Córdoba, Argentina
Contact:

Re: CCQ on wireless-test

Sun Feb 05, 2006 10:31 pm

Hi all,

I noticed that CCQ value on wireless interface si much higher when using wireless-test package. Why?

Before enabling wireless-test I had valuses about 10-20%, now I have over 60%-90%
The driver has been improved on new wireless package

Regards
José Ignacio Acosta
MikroTik Consultant IDAR0001
Mikronet

Movile: +54 9 3472-624722
Email/Msn: info[at]mikronet.com.ar
 
rastod
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 122
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 11:35 pm
Location: Slovakia

Mon Feb 06, 2006 12:55 am

So higher CCQ is incorrect? Or how to understand?
 
cibernet
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 610
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 7:22 pm
Location: Marcos Juárez, Córdoba, Argentina
Contact:

Mon Feb 06, 2006 12:59 am

So higher CCQ is incorrect? Or how to understand?
No, it´s correct, because the wireless driver has been inproved you see that difference :D

Regards
José Ignacio Acosta
MikroTik Consultant IDAR0001
Mikronet

Movile: +54 9 3472-624722
Email/Msn: info[at]mikronet.com.ar
 
rastod
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 122
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 11:35 pm
Location: Slovakia

Mon Feb 06, 2006 1:01 am

And how should I understand the growth? What was changed?
 
cibernet
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 610
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 7:22 pm
Location: Marcos Juárez, Córdoba, Argentina
Contact:

Mon Feb 06, 2006 1:12 am

And how should I understand the growth? What was changed?
Ask mikrotik about it... i only know it was been inproved... but i dont know what especific :lol: and i see the diference in my ap and backhauls


Regards
 
User avatar
djape
Member
Member
Posts: 469
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 7:54 pm
Location: Serbia

Mon Feb 06, 2006 12:30 pm

Why do you complain?
60-90% ccq is better then 10-20%
You don't like your wireless to have good ccq? :shock:
I drink like a pirate and smoke like a hippie...
 
cibernet
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 610
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 7:22 pm
Location: Marcos Juárez, Córdoba, Argentina
Contact:

Mon Feb 06, 2006 10:15 pm

Why do you complain?
60-90% ccq is better then 10-20%
You don't like your wireless to have good ccq? :shock:
:lol:
José Ignacio Acosta
MikroTik Consultant IDAR0001
Mikronet

Movile: +54 9 3472-624722
Email/Msn: info[at]mikronet.com.ar

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 52 guests