Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
GJS
Member
Member
Topic Author
Posts: 418
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 4:07 pm
Location: London

Quick VPN Help Needed Please!

Tue Feb 21, 2006 3:44 am

I have a MT with two interfaces, public which faces the public Internet and private which faces a private wireless network. I NAT private addresses on the wireless side to a single public address on the public side. I have a wireless customer who says he cannot get his VPN service to work (I do not yet know what type of VPN it is). He is trying to run it from his machine to a VPN server on the Internet. In my MT logs I have serveral entries like this when he tries to connect:

feb/20/2006 10:21:48 received ISAKMP packet from 212.135.38.10:500, phase 2, Quick >
feb/20/2006 10:21:48 no peer configuration found (remote unknown)
feb/20/2006 10:21:48 cannot start quick mode without phase 1 (remote unknown)

Is this because he is trying to connect from a private NATed address? Or does anyone have any other ideas why it is not working?

Many thanks.
Guy
 
User avatar
mag
Member
Member
Posts: 376
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 12:32 pm
Location: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Contact:

Tue Feb 21, 2006 10:12 am

Depends on the type of VPN she/he is trying to use, obviously some IPSec-Client. This will not work without NAT-T on the router itself, or a transparent IP-connection without NAT.

Not really a solution, sorry.
 
GJS
Member
Member
Topic Author
Posts: 418
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 4:07 pm
Location: London

Tue Feb 21, 2006 10:36 am

Thanks for your reply, Mag. I've read a bit about IPSec and IKE and as you say, they will not work across NAT. I'm going to try proxying a public address to this customer and see if that works.

Cheers,
Guy
 
User avatar
djape
Member
Member
Posts: 465
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 7:54 pm
Location: Serbia

Tue Feb 21, 2006 10:47 am

No, it should work accross NAT, customer just need to have both src and dst nat configured (public address). If he is masquaraded, then it can't work.

Cheers...
 
GJS
Member
Member
Topic Author
Posts: 418
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 4:07 pm
Location: London

Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:35 am

Thanks, Djape. I should have said, more correctly, that I am masquerading the private addresses to the public ones.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: harisir18, jaclaz, McSee, r0nzzibb, Thisced1952 and 188 guests