That's great normis!I don't think that 98% is correct. All Apple computers support 802.11ac
MikroTik is working on .ac products for this year.
That's the beauty of the PtP and PtMP (as opposed to BYOD) environments most of this gear is used in. We don't care what most people have as we're building it all ourselves. 802.11ac in its later revisions will be very important (mu-MIMO for one).That's great normis!I don't think that 98% is correct. All Apple computers support 802.11ac
MikroTik is working on .ac products for this year.
We'll appreciate higher speeds.
Regarding the numbers... like I wrote - just figurative. I saw a presentation recently and such high number was cited there. But I still believe that it will take at least couple of years for the 11ac standard to pick up speed. Especially in the consumer market.
The consumer market is there, just the providers aren't. Since my local provider started delivering gigabit internet to home at decent prices, everyone suddenly wants .ac. There was no need for it until now.But I still believe that it will take at least couple of years for the 11ac standard to pick up speed. Especially in the consumer market.
There is and was definitly an market, how about streaming locally from your nas to your laptop ? goes a lot smoother with 802.11ac , so the provider aint that important thereThe consumer market is there, just the providers aren't. Since my local provider started delivering gigabit internet to home at decent prices, everyone suddenly wants .ac. There was no need for it until now.But I still believe that it will take at least couple of years for the 11ac standard to pick up speed. Especially in the consumer market.
Was that photo-shopped? How come the 6.11 final doesn't show that...It seems that something is going on with 6.11rc1 and new wireless package.
rc1 versions can contain all sorts of strange thingsWas that photo-shopped? How come the 6.11 final doesn't show that...It seems that something is going on with 6.11rc1 and new wireless package.
There are no WISP focused AC products out of beta.Do You mean strange is that we see ac is being worked on?
Or it was kind of april fool's joke we were supposed to encounter to see smile on our faces
Either the way it's always about money, our money. The other maker gear for 5GHz is already on the market. Assuming it would be as reliable as 24GHz model, time is really running out.
Since ar92xx ros does not support extra channel width making this obsolete chip the most effective right now in mtik.
I have to choose new solution for my network and I decided to go with products from another maker.
Is that possible to announce when will 802.11ac be supported by routeros?
The only answer you'll get is: "When it's done it's done". I like this policy as it does not mislead with wrong promises as some other vendors do.I would like to know exact date when there is support QCA9882, or you can start to move to another manufacturer's equipment, which is not very much like to, accustomed to mikrotik.
technically - there wasn't any much of interest among WISP to AC.There are no WISP focused AC products out of beta.Do You mean strange is that we see ac is being worked on?
Or it was kind of april fool's joke we were supposed to encounter to see smile on our faces
Either the way it's always about money, our money. The other maker gear for 5GHz is already on the market. Assuming it would be as reliable as 24GHz model, time is really running out.
Since ar92xx ros does not support extra channel width making this obsolete chip the most effective right now in mtik.
I have to choose new solution for my network and I decided to go with products from another maker.
Is that possible to announce when will 802.11ac be supported by routeros?
Sure there is, when there's AC stuff with GPS, I'll be hanging it.technically - there wasn't any much of interest among WISP to AC.
so probably topicstarter talks not about carrier-grade sfuff nor something for BH deployment(cause range .
Uldis said they work on .ac. I say GPS will not happen with MT. To do this you've to dig deep into the wifi chipset and make changes there. UBNT failed to do it while promising and selling it. MT did not make promises. If you need GPS you've to look elsewhere.Sure there is, when there's AC stuff with GPS, I'll be hanging it.technically - there wasn't any much of interest among WISP to AC.
so probably topicstarter talks not about carrier-grade sfuff nor something for BH deployment(cause range .
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk
GPS on Atheros works for Cambium and Radwin.Uldis said they work on .ac. I say GPS will not happen with MT. To do this you've to dig deep into the wifi chipset and make changes there. UBNT failed to do it while promising and selling it. MT did not make promises. If you need GPS you've to look elsewhere.Sure there is, when there's AC stuff with GPS, I'll be hanging it.technically - there wasn't any much of interest among WISP to AC.
so probably topicstarter talks not about carrier-grade sfuff nor something for BH deployment(cause range .
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk
I hope .ac gives a push to the market. At least with short ptp links we'll see great speeds. We'll need good antennas and fast cpus.
No. (GPS)-Sync always help reduce interference. MU-Mimo would increase the capacityMU-MIMO may mitigate the need for GPS... *MAY*.
So you did not run into interference problems? I see this with our unsynced radwin links too. Using 160mhz channels the spectrum is eaten at once. Doing this unsynced you need great antennas a lot of distance at the tower and shielding.Guys! I'm not expecting super extra features from equipment worth a few hundred $. I don't care about sync mu-mimo etc, I need plain wider channels 80-160mhz with QAM16 resilient modulation to achieve dozens or a few hundreds more mbps on ptp links.
I don't expect to have all the 802.11ac features right now, just wider channels.
btw. I paid a lot $ yesterday for 5 complete Radwin links, and that is my concern.
And thinking about malfunction of GPS/glonass/galileo whatever is a kind of theoretical and never to fulfill expectations. and even if it would become truth I doubt if our not syncronised link would be biggest problem of modern world around us. I would rather be afraid of falling planes, enormous traffic jam, crashes etc.
And YES there are WISP products using 802.11ac already deployed and tested in EU. so what is the problem ?