Community discussions

 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24276
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 10:29 am

If you are already running a RouterOS 6 install, Simply click “Check for updates” in QuickSet, Webfig or Winbox packages menu.
What's new in 6.11 (2014-Mar-20 09:16):

*) ipsec - fix aes-cbc hardware acceleration on CCR with key sizes 192 and 256;
*) wireless - add auto frequency feature;
*) ovpn - fixed TLS renegotiation;
*) ovpn - make bridge mode work with big packets (do not leave extraneous padding);
*) ovpn - fixed require-client-certifcate;
*) ppp - revert RADIUS NAS-Port behaviour, report tunnel interface id;
*) ppp - mppe encryption together with mrru locked the router;
*) dhcp - added support for DHCP option 138 - list of CAPWAP IPv4 servers;
*) quickset - added Guest Network setup to Home AP mode;
*) console - no longer required to supply value of '/routing bgp instance vrf'
property 'instance' for 'add' command;
*) ethernet - added option to enable rx/tx flow control
(will be disabled by default);
*) ethernet - added ability to specify advertised modes for copper ports;
*) fixed 100% cpu usage on CCRs;
*) ssl - not finding CRL in local store for any certificate in trust chain will cause connection to fail;
*) lte - support for Huawei ME609 and ME909u-521;
Available separately, is a new Wireless-FP package, which includes the new CAPsMAN feature. This is a beta package, so use only in controlled test networks. The package will replace your default Wireless package upon installation, which means it will also add wireless functionality changes and improvements, not only CAPsMAN. More information about the Wireless Controller (CAPsMAN) is here: http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:CAPsMAN
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
isai
just joined
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2014 4:11 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 10:48 am

What about following regarding SMB issues....???

Mail a little while ago :

[Mikrotik Support]
Hello,

Thank you very much for the report.
Problem will be fixed in the next RouterOS version.

Regards,
Sergejs

02/28/2014 16:22
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24276
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 10:49 am

What about following regarding SMB issues....???

Mail a little while ago :

[Mikrotik Support]
Hello,

Thank you very much for the report.
Problem will be fixed in the next RouterOS version.

Regards,
Sergejs

02/28/2014 16:22
have you checked it?
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
User avatar
CyberTod
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 511
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:23 am

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 10:54 am

This was present in v6.10 as well. I don't remember now if it was fixed after a few reboots.
mikrotik-log.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
JanezFord
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 264
Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 10:58 am

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:22 am

[/quote]
This is external IP of router. Before upgrade everything worked without this rule. I added this rule yesterday.[/quote]

I just tried my RB951G-2HnD and SNTP works fine ... as it did on 6.10 ... it must be something with your configs.

JF
 
User avatar
Jetrider
newbie
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 11:31 am

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:33 am

Have anyone tried DHCP server on VLAN yet ? Any comments ?
 
twingman
just joined
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:10 am
Location: Žilina, Slovakia
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:35 am

What about PPP links and MRRU value? V 6.8 and later were affected, router still reboots.

In changelog there is info that the problem should be resolved, but has someone tested it? Please write there :)

RB 1100AHx2

Thank you
2x CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+
1x CRS328-24P-4S+
many (cca 200) RB951`s, some 2011, 4011, wAPs, ...
 
Lupin
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 265
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 10:22 pm
Location: Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:39 am

This is a beta package, so use only in controlled test networks. The package will replace your default Wireless package upon installation, which means it will also add wireless functionality changes and improvements, not only CAPsMAN.
What are the improvements?
Improved also NV2 protocol?
 
User avatar
NathanA
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 801
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 9:01 am

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:48 am

What about PPP links and MRRU value? V 6.8 and later were affected, router still reboots.

In changelog there is info that the problem should be resolved, but has someone tested it?
It solved the problem for me on x86. I tested 6.11 and no more lockups when using MPPE + MRRU.
RB 1100AHx2
Never tested it on RB1000-series. Why don't you give it a shot on a spare/non-production board? :)

-- Nathan
 
ManyX
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 111
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 12:48 pm
Location: PolanD

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:57 am

wireless - add auto frequency feature; -

Please send me more information about this feature

Regards.
 
ropeba
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 4:13 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:58 am

What's with bug described in topic "6.x is useless" which has disappeared from forum and only Miktotik knows why. Prolem is also described in Ticket#2014022266000216

And this bug also persist from 6.x:
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... mp#p388997
 
mietus
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 11:14 pm
Location: Poland

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 12:02 pm

MT:
"This new package has also other wireless improvments apart from CAPsMAN,
for example Wireless Fast Path for 802.11, and others."

A bit more details about it?
 
dousin
just joined
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 11:54 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 12:11 pm

What about the bug in SSTP (Mikrotik server, connecting from windows 7/8 client)? It simply stopped working in 6.8 and higher. I am still using 6.7.
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=81644
Is the issue still there, or can somebody claim, it works again?
Thx
Dousin. RB493G
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24276
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 12:19 pm

wireless - add auto frequency feature; -

Please send me more information about this feature

Regards.
It will do scan, and choose the least occupied frequency automatically. This happens only once, when you apply this setting, reboot, or disable/enable interface. Similar to DFS, but with no radar-detect.
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
User avatar
leoktv
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 140
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: sweden
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 12:32 pm

HI
How is it with frequency-mode settings in CapsMan or is the settings on the radio the one doing this?
_________________
Leo De Geer, Mikrotik Certified Consultant/Trainer #TR0003, MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE, MTCUME, MTCIPv6E MTCSE MTCASE & MikroTik Distributor
http://www.mikrotik.se
support[at]mikrotik.se
Office: +46 325 660 650
 
User avatar
zervan
Member
Member
Posts: 324
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:43 pm
Location: Slovakia
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 1:04 pm

I've set Flow Control to auto on all my routers. Can I see if it is turned on? Wiki says something about autonegotiation - how can I see the result?
Dusan Zervan from Slovakia
MTCNA, MTCRE
 
Lupin
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 265
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 10:22 pm
Location: Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 1:25 pm

This is a beta package, so use only in controlled test networks. The package will replace your default Wireless package upon installation, which means it will also add wireless functionality changes and improvements, not only CAPsMAN.
What are the improvements?
Improved also NV2 protocol?
We tried Wireless Package and 6.11 and see very good improvements on Upload throughput (CPE to Access Point with NV2 protocol)
A client with, before 9Mbps now reach 25-30Mbps

What syntax 1S/2S stand for?
whatIs.png
Unfortunately I still see high latency when the line is not in use.
And the other problem, that persists, is that a cell with a client who have 25Mbps of bandwidth and another that makes 7Mbps, if launched simultaneously both go to 7Mbps.
The cpe with problems degrade much all other customers
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
usx
newbie
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2013 7:30 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 1:43 pm

RB450G and 2011UiAS-2HnD upgraded without any problems.

RB450 had to be rebooted again a couple of minutes later, since the cpu was averaging at about 45%, but after the reboot it went down to the usual <7% average.
 
uldis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 3425
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 2:55 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 2:01 pm

What syntax 1S/2S stand for?
Spatial Streams:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.1 ... Data_rates
 
User avatar
NathanA
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 801
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 9:01 am

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 2:03 pm

It will do scan, and choose the least occupied frequency automatically. This happens only once, when you apply this setting, reboot, or disable/enable interface. Similar to DFS, but with no radar-detect.
So what is the difference between this and 'dfs-mode=no-radar-detect' ?

-- Nathan
 
Kadafi
newbie
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 5:52 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 2:15 pm

Still no COA in PPP...
Even new ppp package.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24276
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 2:31 pm

It will do scan, and choose the least occupied frequency automatically. This happens only once, when you apply this setting, reboot, or disable/enable interface. Similar to DFS, but with no radar-detect.
So what is the difference between this and 'dfs-mode=no-radar-detect' ?

-- Nathan
easier to find
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24276
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 2:31 pm

Still no COA in PPP...
Even new ppp package.
Yes.
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
skibi82
newbie
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 7:09 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 2:59 pm

Know when you will be added possibility to configure the SRC IP for:
OVPN Client L2TP Client, Client SSTP, PPTP Client

I have another question whether there is a possibility in the future to add posibility to define on ppp connection
parameter to the name of routing table.
 
netwpl
newbie
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:09 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 3:54 pm

hi!

the new CAPMAN feature is nice! everything is working so far.
are there any plans for supporting hotspot-ssid's, without authentification over it ?

the problem is, that the capman wireless ssid's always needs a password when connecting...

or are there other ways to combine mikrotik hotspot-system with the capman functionallity ?

BR
 
User avatar
leoktv
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 140
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: sweden
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 3:59 pm

hi!

the new CAPMAN feature is nice! everything is working so far.
are there any plans for supporting hotspot-ssid's, without authentification over it ?

the problem is, that the capman wireless ssid's always needs a password when connecting...

or are there other ways to combine mikrotik hotspot-system with the capman functionallity ?

BR
Hi
Add a slave config then you are going to get a a VAP in the aps. add it to a bridge inside the Capsmanager router with the hotspot on it then you don't need a encrypted network for it.
_________________
Leo De Geer, Mikrotik Certified Consultant/Trainer #TR0003, MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE, MTCUME, MTCIPv6E MTCSE MTCASE & MikroTik Distributor
http://www.mikrotik.se
support[at]mikrotik.se
Office: +46 325 660 650
 
visalink
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:42 am

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 4:28 pm

This is a beta package, so use only in controlled test networks. The package will replace your default Wireless package upon installation, which means it will also add wireless functionality changes and improvements, not only CAPsMAN.
What are the improvements?
Improved also NV2 protocol?
Unfortunately I still see high latency when the line is not in use.
And the other problem, that persists, is that a cell with a client who have 25Mbps of bandwidth and another that makes 7Mbps, if launched simultaneously both go to 7Mbps.
The cpe with problems degrade much all other customers
+1
 
netwpl
newbie
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:09 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 4:37 pm

hi!

the new CAPMAN feature is nice! everything is working so far.
are there any plans for supporting hotspot-ssid's, without authentification over it ?

the problem is, that the capman wireless ssid's always needs a password when connecting...

or are there other ways to combine mikrotik hotspot-system with the capman functionallity ?

BR
Hi
Add a slave config then you are going to get a a VAP in the aps. add it to a bridge inside the Capsmanager router with the hotspot on it then you don't need a encrypted network for it.
sometimes life could be that simple!

thanks a lot for your help. works like a charm!

BR
 
finalcutroot
newbie
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 9:36 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 6:02 pm

Thanks for your great efforts
 
isai
just joined
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2014 4:11 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 6:23 pm

What about following regarding SMB issues....???

Mail a little while ago :

[Mikrotik Support]
Hello,

Thank you very much for the report.
Problem will be fixed in the next RouterOS version.

Regards,
Sergejs

02/28/2014 16:22
have you checked it?



Yup....same thing still..
 
User avatar
rmmccann
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 182
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:15 pm
Location: USA

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 6:46 pm

Can someone confirm if SSTP is fixed or still broken?
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools. --Douglas Adams
 
morph027
just joined
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 10:58 am

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 7:03 pm

Tried CAPsMAN with auto generated certificates, but the CAP won't send any request for signing (config looks exactly like in the wiki article). However, creating certificates on my own works perfectly. Just tried a simple configuration, but I already love it.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk
 
User avatar
honzam
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2293
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:27 pm
Location: Czech Republic

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 7:03 pm

Normis. I have problem after upgrade SXT Lite5 to 6.11.
Previous version was pre-release 6.11 from 13.Mar with wireless-fp package active. After upgrade to final 6.11 (combined package) is SXT in booting loop.
Mac telnet not work. Ping dont work.
Reset works but nothing changed after reset - still booting loop.
Netinstall dont work - write sending offer --> instaling. But no process. No install :(
How to bring SXT to life? Thanks
LAN, FTTx, Wireless. ISP operator
 
morph027
just joined
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 10:58 am

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 7:05 pm

Auto signing from CAP to CAPsMAN did not work. No request sent. Using my own certificates, everything works fine.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk
 
voxframe
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 126
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 2:51 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 7:46 pm

Can anyone else please confirm SSTP working or still broken???
 
ditonet
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 841
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:52 am
Location: Europe/Poland/Konstancin-Jeziorna
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 7:46 pm

Log shows events with GMT time, not according to timezone.
Tested on RB433AH and RB951-2n with latest RouterOS and RouterBOOT.

Regards,
Grzegorz | MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCSE | konsultacje MikroTik Warszawa
It is a book about a Spanish guy called Manual. You should read it. - Dilbert
 
npero
Member
Member
Posts: 316
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:59 pm
Location: Serbia

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 7:54 pm

Some problem but no rule some RB working some not, 433AH working, 433GL no, one Groove is ok other not.

Solution:
Winbox
1. Open clock
2. Select time zone manual click apply
3. Select back your time zone click apply
4. Click OK (must click ok )

Log time is now ok.
Log shows events with GMT time, not according to timezone.
Tested on RB433AH and RB951-2n with latest RouterOS and RouterBOOT.

Regards,
 
blazej44800
newbie
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2014 6:16 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:01 pm

Good morning, after upgrade I see this - the select box is not full width in WinBox. It's normal or bug? I didn't see this in earlier versions.
screenshot-ros.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
Beeski
newbie
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 4:42 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:09 pm

Have anyone tried DHCP server on VLAN yet ? Any comments ?
+1
 
ffernandes
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:20 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:14 pm

Normis. I have problem after upgrade SXT Lite5 to 6.11.
Previous version was pre-release 6.11 from 13.Mar with wireless-fp package active. After upgrade to final 6.11 (combined package) is SXT in booting loop.
Mac telnet not work. Ping dont work.
Reset works but nothing changed after reset - still booting loop.
Netinstall dont work - write sending offer --> instaling. But no process. No install :(
How to bring SXT to life? Thanks
had something today with that..
use the reset bottom to force it to go for netinstall..... after its easy..
remove old set...
ad new version and install it

spent this afternoon with 1 rb433 and a 912-5hnd...
 
Majklik
newbie
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 10:20 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:20 pm

Can anyone else please confirm SSTP working or still broken???
Which bug?

Unable connect from Windows client - it works with 6.11. I use this SSTP setup:
/ppp profile
add change-tcp-mss=no incoming-filter=rw-in/fwd name=sstp-rw only-one=yes use-compression=no use-encryption=no use-mpls=no use-vj-compression=no
/interface sstp-server server
set authentication=chap,mschap2 certificate=MDPSKRBx  default-profile=sstp-rw enabled=yes force-aes=yes keepalive-timeout=30
A bug that SSTP server do not drop connection if client do not reply (is ignored keepalive-timeout=30) is still there if is used PAP or CHAP authorization and configured the server certificate (is not used certificate=none).
 
ditonet
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 841
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:52 am
Location: Europe/Poland/Konstancin-Jeziorna
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:22 pm

Some problem but no rule some RB working some not, 433AH working, 433GL no, one Groove is ok other not.

Solution:
Winbox
1. Open clock
2. Select time zone manual click apply
3. Select back your time zone click apply
4. Click OK (must click ok )

Log time is now ok.
Log shows events with GMT time, not according to timezone.
Tested on RB433AH and RB951-2n with latest RouterOS and RouterBOOT.

Regards,
npero, thanks, your solution works.
But it's workaround for bug :(

Regards,
Grzegorz | MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCSE | konsultacje MikroTik Warszawa
It is a book about a Spanish guy called Manual. You should read it. - Dilbert
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:57 pm

Ticket#2014031766000331
6.10 BUG: user-manager profile limitation can not add profile limitation on command line when default admin customer are renamed, because missing "owner=" parameter.

This bug is still present on last official 6.11.

the error are replicable:
install with netinstall 6.11 whit NO keep old configuration
routeros-mipsbe-6.11.npk
user-manager-6.11-mipsbe.npk
on a RB750UP with bios 3.13 [hardware no matter...]

on
/tool user-manager profile limitation add name=test2
missing the possibility to set
owner=notadmin
parameter
it suppose everytime the owner are "admin" only.

I paste the terminal output:
[admin@MikroTik] > /tool user-manager profile limitation
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager profile limitation> print
# NAME OWNER
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager profile limitation> add name=test
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager profile limitation> print
# NAME OWNER
0 test admin
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager profile limitation> /tool user-manager customer
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager customer> print
Flags: X - disabled
0 login="admin" password="" backup-allowed=yes time-zone=-00:00 permissions=owner signup-allowed=no paypal-allowed=no paypal-secure-response=no paypal-accept-pending=no
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager customer> set 0 login=notadmin
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager customer> print
Flags: X - disabled
0 login="notadmin" password="" backup-allowed=yes time-zone=-00:00 permissions=owner signup-allowed=no paypal-allowed=no paypal-secure-response=no paypal-accept-pending=no
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager customer> /tool user-manager profile limitation
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager profile limitation> print
# NAME OWNER
0 test notadmin
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager profile limitation> add name=test2
failure: customer does not exist
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager profile limitation>
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager profile limitation>add name=test2 (!!!TAB key pressed!!!)
address-list comment copy-from download-limit group-name ip-pool rate-limit-... transfer-limit upload-limit uptime-limit
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager profile limitation> add name=test2 owner=notadmin
expected end of command (line 1 column 16)
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager profile limitation>
Last edited by rextended on Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:58 pm

This bug are worst on last official 6.11:

http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 00#p415948

winbox on IP of CPE obtained by PPPoE not work correctly
Actually are another bug, also present on 6.8, 6.9 and 6.10
and go worst on 6.11:

Winbox connection from pc directly connected on the gateway/pppoe server [really not matter where pc are connected]
to one CPE on IP obtained from pppoe with MRRU set,
is continually broken after receiving some data from CPE.

The problem regard exclusively Winbox service on RouterOS, bandwidth and other parameters working perfectly with very low latency.

On 6.7 is perfectly stable.

The problem is not present if one ip for wlan1 are used.
I hope is not necessary write all single passages, there is sufficent informations to understand how obtain the problem.
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
madpixel
just joined
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2014 10:55 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:29 pm

There is a bug in netflow on 6.11:
In netflow data from pppoe interfaces input interface has index of output interface and output interface has index of input interface, all other netflow data from such interfaces seems to be correct.

On ethernet interfaces all netflow data is correct.
 
User avatar
payday
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 233
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 11:05 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:40 pm

wireless - add auto frequency feature; -
It will do scan, and choose the least occupied frequency automatically. This happens only once, when you apply this setting, reboot, or disable/enable interface. Similar to DFS, but with no radar-detect.
Is this option available in CAPsMAN? I cannot find it in settings.
 
morph027
just joined
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 10:58 am

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 10:19 pm

Tested the new CAPsMAN feature. Works so far. Autorequesting certificates did not work (same config as described in wiki article), using own self signed, all is perfect. Will play around with this next week!
 
plisken
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2425
Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 12:24 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 10:43 pm

NTP don't work on RouterOs 6.11.
Several ntp servers tried to no avail.
After a few hours, after reboot
see attachement
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
ejansson
Member
Member
Posts: 301
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 4:09 pm
Location: Manitoba, Canada

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 10:52 pm

Where is the setting for the auto frequency selection? can't seem to find it anywhere
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8319
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:01 pm

NTP Client works for me on x86 (synchronizes in a few seconds), but it just says 'stopped' in WinBox (although enabled) and 'status: reached' in Terminal
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
blazej44800
newbie
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2014 6:16 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:02 pm

NTP don't work on RouterOs 6.11.
Several ntp servers tried to no avail.
After a few hours, after reboot
see attachement
For me, on RB2011-UAS-2HnD works normal.
Where is the setting for the auto frequency selection? can't seem to find it anywhere
It's last option in Frequency selectbox (auto).
 
huntah
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 3:24 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 22, 2014 12:16 am

DHCP on VLAN seems to be working at least for me on RB751-2HND
 
plisken
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2425
Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 12:24 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 22, 2014 12:21 am

NTP on omnitik don't work sorry but it is true
NTP Client works for me on x86 (synchronizes in a few seconds), but it just says 'stopped' in WinBox (although enabled) and 'status: reached' in Terminal
 
Zavi
newbie
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 1:02 pm
Location: Czech Republic

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 22, 2014 12:41 am

Upgraded RB2011-UiAS. The "starting services" screen stays longer than usual and in log i found one more reboot with kernel failure. Then about minute aftrer start ethernet interfaces were "restarted". Built-in NTP client works, auto-frequency works. Quickset shows WISP AP page, i believe that before it was HOME AP, but i don't use it.

One problem i had was that from virtual interface was lost "static interface" setting, after reassign it works.
RB751G-2HnD & RB2011UiAS-2HnD-IN at home
 
pitr
just joined
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:14 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 22, 2014 2:02 am

My openvpn connections broke again like 2 releases ago. RB951's
 
jkarras
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 224
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 3:07 am
Location: Utah, USA

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 22, 2014 3:27 am

Where is the setting for the auto frequency selection? can't seem to find it anywhere
Choose auto under the frequency selection. Its at the bottom of the list.
 
Iliasla
just joined
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 7:33 pm
Location: Siberia
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 22, 2014 9:35 am

Changed the design of the panels in Winbox, and not for the better. Became scary and very uncomfortable. :? Return back, please, as it was in versions for 6.10 inclusive.

With greetings from participants forum.ixbt.com :wink:

Image
 
User avatar
zervan
Member
Member
Posts: 324
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:43 pm
Location: Slovakia
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 22, 2014 9:58 am

Changed the design of the panels in Winbox, and not for the better. Became scary and very uncomfortable. :? Return back, please, as it was in versions for 6.10 inclusive.
I don't have anything changed in design. Did you try to run Winbox from another computer?

EDIT: Oh, sorry, I was wrong. I thought that new design is related to new empty firewall rule which is the same. But you are right - it is changed when I fill anything.
Last edited by zervan on Sat Mar 22, 2014 11:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
Dusan Zervan from Slovakia
MTCNA, MTCRE
 
neophyte
just joined
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 10:39 am

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 22, 2014 10:07 am

Image
x86
 
Clauu
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 205
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:27 pm
Location: RO

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 22, 2014 10:34 am

Hi there, i'm currently running 6.5, the update package comes with the latest firmware also? Or it must be installed manually, my router has 3.10 and as i see on the router page the latest is 3.12..?
Having fun with RB850Gx2, RB2011UiAS-2HnD, RB260GSP, RB751U-2HnD, CRS112, RB3011UiAS, hAP ac, cAP ac and hAP ac². More others on the way :-)
 
User avatar
noyo
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 114
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 12:25 am
Location: Mazury - Poland
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 22, 2014 11:03 am

47.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
Sander
newbie
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 5:50 am
Location: Shanghai

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 22, 2014 12:05 pm

Routing Mark problem returns on my RB2011L. Downgrade to 6.7 solved the problem.
 
morph027
just joined
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 10:58 am

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 22, 2014 1:55 pm

Does CAPsMAN only load on hardware that has a wireless card? I am able to see it on my upgraded RB951-2n but not on my RB750GL. I was hoping to test it by controlling the 951-2n with the 750GL.
Nope, i'm testing on one of our RB2011iL-RM atm and works fine.
 
challado
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:53 am

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 22, 2014 1:57 pm

Bug on this new interface.
Bridge filters with in/out interface simply "disappear" from winbox but still appears on console.
Image
 
yozz
just joined
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 11:51 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 22, 2014 2:19 pm

What's new in 6.11 (2014-Mar-20 09:16):

*) ipsec - fix aes-cbc hardware acceleration on CCR with key sizes 192 and 256;
*) wireless - add auto frequency feature;
*) ovpn - fixed TLS renegotiation;
*) ovpn - make bridge mode work with big packets (do not leave extraneous padding);
*) ovpn - fixed require-client-certifcate;
*) ppp - revert RADIUS NAS-Port behaviour, report tunnel interface id;
*) ppp - mppe encryption together with mrru locked the router;
*) dhcp - added support for DHCP option 138 - list of CAPWAP IPv4 servers;
*) quickset - added Guest Network setup to Home AP mode;
*) console - no longer required to supply value of '/routing bgp instance vrf'
property 'instance' for 'add' command;
*) ethernet - added option to enable rx/tx flow control
(will be disabled by default);
*) ethernet - added ability to specify advertised modes for copper ports;
*) fixed 100% cpu usage on CCRs;
*) ssl - not finding CRL in local store for any certificate in trust chain will cause connection to fail;
*) lte - support for Huawei ME609 and ME909u-521;


after update. openvpn is down. CERTIFICAT autorization and md5 + blownfish128
i was removed and create new connection but session not started.


in lasted version all was worked (6.10)


now log is - session tedminated by peer(server)!!!

please recover openvpn service!!!!!!
 
yozz
just joined
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 11:51 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 22, 2014 2:31 pm

hello! after update in my routers openvpn will not worked!
 
timk
just joined
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2012 3:33 am

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 22, 2014 2:47 pm

Hi,

Do you know if the IP route cache filling bug (Ticket#2014031066000031) was resolved in this release?

Cheers
 
nicklowe
just joined
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2013 5:06 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 22, 2014 3:58 pm

A SSTP tunnel that I have between two Mikrotik routers broke after the upgrade to 6.11.
It is configured so that the client verifies the server certificate and the server verifies the client certificate.

The certificate and server certificate derive from the same root. The root is one that I generated.

I suspect that it is this that has caused the issue somehow:

*) ssl - not finding CRL in local store for any certificate in trust chain will cause connection to fail.

If there is no CRL defined on a certificate in the trust chain, does this still cause connections to fail? If so, I assume this would be a new bug.

(Having disabled certificate validation at both ends, the tunnel is established successfully.)
 
jarda
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 7604
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:46 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 22, 2014 4:09 pm

All devices of following types upgraded ok:
RB2011, RB750, GrooveA 2Hn, Omnitik, SXT Lite5.

Some of them were upgraded to RouterBoot 3.13.

Changelog is missing: http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/RouterBOOT_changelog ! What has changed?
 
milhorini
just joined
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 1:41 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 22, 2014 4:48 pm

Bug in bridge with v6.11

after I upgrade my ccr 1036 and 1016, my bridge interface disappeared. And queues don't working...

only downgrade to v6.10 to solve..

pictures below

Image

Image

Image
 
shuttle
just joined
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 9:26 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 22, 2014 5:07 pm

Firmware 3.12 show as latest for RB2011UiAS-RM. Is this correct? some sources claim to use 3.13 on routerboards, generally.
 
slech
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 533
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:03 pm
Location: Moldova, Chisinau

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 22, 2014 6:15 pm

My openvpn connections broke again like 2 releases ago. RB951's
ROS 6.11 - RB-951G-2HnD - OVPN Server
ROS 6.11 - RB-951G-2HnD - OVPN Client

All working fine as it was in 6.10, 6,9.
sorry for my english
 
stroebs
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 9:46 pm
Location: Cape Town, ZA

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 22, 2014 10:07 pm

Hi,

Do you know if the IP route cache filling bug (Ticket#2014031066000031) was resolved in this release?

Cheers
This is perhaps the same issue I'm having.

Everything on later 3 (IP) stops responding after a while, can still MAC Winbox but that's about it.

Devices this is happening on in my personal experience:
CCR1016-12G
RB 433UAH
RB SXT 5nD r2
 
dlj87
just joined
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2012 8:52 am

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 22, 2014 10:30 pm

OpenVPN server doesn't work. TLS failed appears in the log. Downgrade to 6.10
 
miszak
just joined
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 8:57 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Sun Mar 23, 2014 12:58 am

In version 6.11 I can't see a greater amount of ports entered in the firewall rule. I have to scroll through them
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
Trisc
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 242
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: Glos, UK

Re: v6.11 released

Sun Mar 23, 2014 10:09 am

Mangle rules no longer working in 6.11 - routing marks have no effect. Downgraded back to 6.10 and everything works again.

+1 with the quality control comment!
 
milhorini
just joined
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 1:41 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Sun Mar 23, 2014 10:16 am

serious BUG in v6.11....

my tecnical suport upgrade two ccr (1 ccr 1016 and 1 1036) both with v6.10 and last routerboot...

after upgrade the problems below appeared.

my 1016 ccr don't return.. just return after netinstall procedure.. BIG problem....
ok after two routeboard with v6.11
bridge interfaces dissapear
filter bridge interfaces dissapear
just show me 1 hotspot nat filter rule... regular had more than 5....
simple queue don't working... don't had bandwidth control in my network....

solution... downgrade to v6.10 and save my weekend...

this just show that routerOs don't have TDD... in 2014 oHHHHHH.....

sorry my bad english...
 
Norman29
just joined
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 9:08 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Sun Mar 23, 2014 12:57 pm

Can not change the ip adress of the local network in quick settings??
The ip adress has changed form the original one to 192.168.2.250??
Edit2: fixed the above, my fault, wrong config.

And what is WISP AP??
mk.jpg
Edit:
Some wireless settings where changed without touching them, like Channel Width...
In Interfaces, settings for masterport where changed...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by Norman29 on Sun Mar 23, 2014 2:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
fronczek
just joined
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2012 1:14 am
Location: Katowice, Poland
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Sun Mar 23, 2014 2:28 pm

Can you please revert width of text fields in WinBox????
 
visalink
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:42 am

Re: v6.11 released

Sun Mar 23, 2014 5:09 pm

Bug on this new interface.
Bridge filters with in/out interface simply "disappear" from winbox but still appears on console.
Image
Also have this problem.
Mikrotik always surprising with their releases ...
 
blazej44800
newbie
Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2014 6:16 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Sun Mar 23, 2014 6:22 pm

Routing Mark problem returns on my RB2011L. Downgrade to 6.7 solved the problem.
I had also problems. CPU was 100% after changing Routing tables. I downgraded to 6.10 and it's ok.
 
jcem
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 4:41 pm
Location: Grebbestad, Sweden

Re: v6.11 released

Sun Mar 23, 2014 10:41 pm

Hi!

If you have high or 100% CPU, try closing some or all windows inside Winbox

or start a fresh session(don't Load previous session)

Works for me. Maybe some old info is stored in the "Previous Session profile....

RGDS
Jörgen
 
killersoft
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 135
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 2:34 pm
Location: Victoria, Australia
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Sun Mar 23, 2014 11:09 pm

NTP Client has stopped working on both of my RB Metal 2SHPn's after upgrading from 6.10 to 6.11.
It just displays the word 'reached' in Winbox, and that's all it does.
MIT, BIT, ITIL, CERT IV Electronics.
 
Majklik
newbie
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 10:20 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 24, 2014 12:03 am

A SSTP tunnel that I have between two Mikrotik routers broke after the upgrade to 6.11.
It is configured so that the client verifies the server certificate and the server verifies the client certificate.

The certificate and server certificate derive from the same root. The root is one that I generated.

I suspect that it is this that has caused the issue somehow:

*) ssl - not finding CRL in local store for any certificate in trust chain will cause connection to fail.

If there is no CRL defined on a certificate in the trust chain, does this still cause connections to fail? If so, I assume this would be a new bug.

(Having disabled certificate validation at both ends, the tunnel is established successfully.)
Yes, it looks like this with ROS6.11. At moment, when is enabled certificate verification then must be used a CRL list. If CA certificate do not have specified URL for the CRL distribution (thus CRL is not downloaded and stored in the router) then check fail.
 
User avatar
zervan
Member
Member
Posts: 324
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:43 pm
Location: Slovakia
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 24, 2014 12:14 am

Careful while upgrading there are ton of bugs - possible u have to do master reset
It is not so bad - I've upgrade all of my 16 various routers and everything works so far.
What Ive want to ask is, there are new futures on ether Auto Negotiation TAB
Tx/Rx Row Control
and Advertise
since I cant find nothing on wiki what exactly those options do?
It is on wiki (Flow Control, not Row), see http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:In ... Properties
Dusan Zervan from Slovakia
MTCNA, MTCRE
 
Lakis
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 701
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 7:52 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 24, 2014 1:59 am

Careful while upgrading there are ton of bugs - possible u have to do master reset
It is not so bad - I've upgrade all of my 16 various routers and everything works so far.
What Ive want to ask is, there are new futures on ether Auto Negotiation TAB
Tx/Rx Row Control
and Advertise
since I cant find nothing on wiki what exactly those options do?
It is on wiki (Flow Control, not Row), see http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:In ... Properties
yea dude u almost got me :)
row.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
patrickmkt
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 157
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 5:21 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 24, 2014 3:11 am

I upgraded a rb2011uas-2HnD from 6.9 to 6.11 and now I can't connect my windows OVPN client to the ROS OVPN server anymore.

The log show: disconnected <TLS failed>

I've checked that the CA and intermediate CA have both a LT status, while the rb2011 cert has a KT status.

If I uncheck the 'require client certificate' in the OVPN server parameters the connection works, but that would defeat the purpose of having a cert authentication in the first place.
 
User avatar
kadosc
just joined
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 3:52 am
Location: Araranguá, SC, BR
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 24, 2014 4:09 am

In my RB1100AHx2 with 500 pppoe connections, i´ve seen 2 times a big drop in the troughput in clients interface, after i reboot, everything back to normal.. some hours after when i changed a ARP entry, the same occours, reboot again.. back to normal.. i will downgrade to 6.7.. :(
 
Sander
newbie
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 5:50 am
Location: Shanghai

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 24, 2014 4:26 am

SSTP connects 6.11 and 5.26 failed with "tls shutdown". Downgrade to 6.7 solved problem.
274.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
Ulypka
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:26 am

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:09 am

Routing Mark problem returns on my RB2011L. Downgrade to 6.7 solved the problem.
+1
any route mark unreachable :lol:
 
User avatar
leoktv
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 140
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: sweden
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 24, 2014 8:47 am

Routing Mark problem returns on my RB2011L. Downgrade to 6.7 solved the problem.
+1
any route mark unreachable :lol:
Hi
All my routingmarks are working ok. Make a supout.rif file and send to support@mikrotik.com so they are able to find your problem.
_________________
Leo De Geer, Mikrotik Certified Consultant/Trainer #TR0003, MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE, MTCUME, MTCIPv6E MTCSE MTCASE & MikroTik Distributor
http://www.mikrotik.se
support[at]mikrotik.se
Office: +46 325 660 650
 
adyb76
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 11:45 am

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 24, 2014 10:57 am

Upgraded CCR1036 which is used solely for QoS and reverted to 6.10 this morning.

Routerboard locked up several times, had to MAC telnet onto device to issue reboot command.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24276
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:00 am

Upgraded CCR1036 which is used solely for QoS and reverted to 6.10 this morning.

Routerboard locked up several times, had to MAC telnet onto device to issue reboot command.
In such situations it's best to make supout.rif file, and email support, before downgrading. Otherwise we can't fix such problem, if you are the only one that had it.
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
patrick7
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 298
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 2:40 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 24, 2014 12:31 pm

At the upgrade from 6.4 to 6.11 some ipsec settings were resetted (eg. Peer AES/SHA -> 3DES/MD5). Someone else?
 
plankanater
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 166
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:56 am

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 24, 2014 1:24 pm

Bug on this new interface.
Bridge filters with in/out interface simply "disappear" from winbox but still appears on console.
Image
+1
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24276
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 24, 2014 2:59 pm

In my RB1100AHx2 with 500 pppoe connections, i´ve seen 2 times a big drop in the troughput in clients interface, after i reboot, everything back to normal.. some hours after when i changed a ARP entry, the same occours, reboot again.. back to normal.. i will downgrade to 6.7.. :(
Please email support with your supout.rif file, we would like to find the cause of this issue.
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
visalink
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:42 am

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 24, 2014 3:24 pm

Can you please revert width of text fields in WinBox????
+1
+1

Normis , this is a modification or a bug?
Last edited by visalink on Mon Mar 24, 2014 3:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
visalink
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:42 am

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 24, 2014 3:25 pm

Bug on this new interface.
Bridge filters with in/out interface simply "disappear" from winbox but still appears on console.
Image
+1
+1

Normis, supout.rif is necessary to know this?
 
voxframe
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 126
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 2:51 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:42 pm

Normis,

Is the winbox text box a bug or on purpose? It is HORRIBLE!

Please revert this back to the previous behavior. I don't see any logic in this change (If it is not a bug)

Seriously, what's happening with the quality control at MT? This is crazy the bugs people are finding. Most are accurate and are able to be reproduced, so they are legitimate. This should not be happening.
 
elgrandiegote
newbie
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 24, 2014 7:38 pm

is very frustrating as a new version to try absolutely anything goes, very unprofessional!!!
 
DmitriiP
just joined
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:42 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 24, 2014 10:40 pm

Why 99% of users just simple complain without simpliest help to developers?

1) make all config backup
2) update
3) if have some problems
- make supout.rif
- reset router
- restore config
- if (fail restore/or same problem) -> make second supout.rif
4) revert for working 5.xx 6.xx and restore config
5) Send supout.rif's to support@mikrotik.com and wait .......

This is more efficient then don't like/worse/disappointed/+1
 
TonyJr
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 201
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 1:30 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 12:17 am

Why 99% of users just simple complain without simpliest help to developers?

1) make all config backup
2) update
3) if have some problems
- make supout.rif
- reset router
- restore config
- if (fail restore/or same problem) -> make second supout.rif
4) revert for working 5.xx 6.xx and restore config
5) Send supout.rif's to support@mikrotik.com and wait .......

This is more efficient then don't like/worse/disappointed/+1
I agree, it is getting like children in a playground now.

The correct procedure for dealing with problems and errors is repeated over and over again.

The forum is not for official support from MikroTik staff. It is supposed to be a nice community based forum.

Sent from my BlackBerry 9900 using Tapatalk
 
DmitriiP
just joined
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:42 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 4:02 am

I don't like to be betatester too for released products.
In last two years i don't meet (software/game/system for pc/mac/phones/mediaplayers/control systems/routers/..) update at all that didn't break anything working before
Every time first impression "wow they fix this", second "f..k for what they break that?"

But this is how it is and Impression's don't help for resolving problems.....
 
m3gaman
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2013 10:24 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 6:11 am

There's a post from user "ropebih" showing his dificulties on ccr with ipv6 where dhcp server gone( http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=83215 ), the problem happens here too(dell server). It occurs when whe use DHCPv6-PD pool option in pppoe profile. The pppoe conects them send the ipv6 pool and if the pppoe conection drop the dhcp-server gone and only solutiuon is to reboot the router.
 
exxtreme
just joined
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 10:35 am

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:50 am

what is auto feature in this version?
 
Dadon
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 9:39 am

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:22 am

Bug on this new interface.
Bridge filters with in/out interface simply "disappear" from winbox but still appears on console.
Image
+1
+1

Normis, supout.rif is necessary to know this?
+1
 
Dadon
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 9:39 am

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:34 am

In my RB1100AHx2 with 500 pppoe connections, i´ve seen 2 times a big drop in the troughput in clients interface, after i reboot, everything back to normal.. some hours after when i changed a ARP entry, the same occours, reboot again.. back to normal.. i will downgrade to 6.7.. :(
+1 No add static ARP entry
 
User avatar
Raf
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 171
Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 4:26 pm
Location: Olesnica, Poland
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 9:02 am

Why 99% of users just simple complain without simpliest help to developers?

1) make all config backup
2) update
3) if have some problems
- make supout.rif
- reset router
- restore config
- if (fail restore/or same problem) -> make second supout.rif
4) revert for working 5.xx 6.xx and restore config
5) Send supout.rif's to support@mikrotik.com and wait .......

This is more efficient then don't like/worse/disappointed/+1
Bug tracking system is needed. 'nuff saif. E-mail with tickets is rather... old solution. Other users can't see my problem(s) and if they have it also, they could leave their observations on bug track. Atlassian Jira or something different and many problems could be gone.
Rafał Wójcik from AWB-NET
High Definition enthusiast
 
ok2slc
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 10:33 am

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 9:10 am

I upgraded a rb2011uas-2HnD from 6.9 to 6.11 and now I can't connect my windows OVPN client to the ROS OVPN server anymore.

The log show: disconnected <TLS failed>

I've checked that the CA and intermediate CA have both a LT status, while the rb2011 cert has a KT status.

If I uncheck the 'require client certificate' in the OVPN server parameters the connection works, but that would defeat the purpose of having a cert authentication in the first place.
Same problem here!
+1 :(
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 10:43 am

Ticket#2014031766000331
6.10 BUG: user-manager profile limitation can not add profile limitation on command line when default admin customer are renamed, because missing "owner=" parameter.

This bug is still present on last official 6.11.

the error are replicable:
install with netinstall 6.11 whit NO keep old configuration
routeros-mipsbe-6.11.npk
user-manager-6.11-mipsbe.npk
on a RB750UP with bios 3.13 [hardware no matter...]

on
/tool user-manager profile limitation add name=test2
missing the possibility to set
owner=notadmin
parameter
it suppose everytime the owner are "admin" only.

I paste the terminal output:
[admin@MikroTik] > /tool user-manager profile limitation
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager profile limitation> print
# NAME OWNER
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager profile limitation> add name=test
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager profile limitation> print
# NAME OWNER
0 test admin
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager profile limitation> /tool user-manager customer
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager customer> print
Flags: X - disabled
0 login="admin" password="" backup-allowed=yes time-zone=-00:00 permissions=owner signup-allowed=no paypal-allowed=no paypal-secure-response=no paypal-accept-pending=no
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager customer> set 0 login=notadmin
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager customer> print
Flags: X - disabled
0 login="notadmin" password="" backup-allowed=yes time-zone=-00:00 permissions=owner signup-allowed=no paypal-allowed=no paypal-secure-response=no paypal-accept-pending=no
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager customer> /tool user-manager profile limitation
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager profile limitation> print
# NAME OWNER
0 test notadmin
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager profile limitation> add name=test2
failure: customer does not exist
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager profile limitation>
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager profile limitation>add name=test2 (!!!TAB key pressed!!!)
address-list comment copy-from download-limit group-name ip-pool rate-limit-... transfer-limit upload-limit uptime-limit
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager profile limitation> add name=test2 owner=notadmin
expected end of command (line 1 column 16)
[admin@MikroTik] /tool user-manager profile limitation>

Still present on x86 6.12 2014/03/24 08:25:43
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 10:44 am

Good morning, after upgrade I see this - the select box is not full width in WinBox. It's normal or bug? I didn't see this in earlier versions.
screenshot-ros.png


Still present on x86 6.12 2014/03/24 08:25:43
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
soosp
just joined
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 7:10 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 11:46 am

OpenVPN server doesn't work. TLS failed appears in the log. Downgrade to 6.10
+1
 
User avatar
karina
Member
Member
Posts: 446
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:18 am
Location: Spain

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 1:11 pm

I must admit it is difficult to know which Comments are actual Bugs confirmed by Mikrotik and which are not. Assuming users are reporting these things to Mikrotik in the proper way and not just posting here. Mikrotik have never posted an official Bug list. This feature would not only help us but stop a lot of negative posting which must be really be gut wrenching for the developers who work extremely hard and deserve a bit more credit for producing the worlds greatest routing OS. I will post a feature request for this. the more users that do the same the more chance Mikrotik will consider the idea
 
drank
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 1:50 pm
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 1:57 pm

Why 99% of users just simple complain without simpliest help to developers?

1) make all config backup
2) update
3) if have some problems
- make supout.rif
- reset router
- restore config
- if (fail restore/or same problem) -> make second supout.rif
4) revert for working 5.xx 6.xx and restore config
5) Send supout.rif's to support@mikrotik.com and wait .......

This is more efficient then don't like/worse/disappointed/+1
Great tip, thanks. But how is this preventing us from stumbling on regression bugs, which are the most often mentioned ones here? Too many of them. Which means MikroTik do not do any QA whatsoever and rely on the end-users to do the testing. I'm a SOHO user so it's fine with me but there are many who use MT in production and its not their duty to do MT's job.

IMHO MT have some issues in the software department, maybe lack of resources. It still puzzles me though why they do not deploy an issue tracking system.

Great thread though - it helped me not update to 6.11

Best regards
My setup: RB951G-2HnD, RouterOS v6.10
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24276
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 2:08 pm

I must admit it is difficult to know which Comments are actual Bugs confirmed by Mikrotik and which are not. Assuming users are reporting these things to Mikrotik in the proper way and not just posting here. Mikrotik have never posted an official Bug list. This feature would not only help us but stop a lot of negative posting which must be really be gut wrenching for the developers who work extremely hard and deserve a bit more credit for producing the worlds greatest routing OS. I will post a feature request for this. the more users that do the same the more chance Mikrotik will consider the idea
Unfortunately 90% of issues posted here, are never reported to support, even if we ask for more info. Many issues are config problems and some issues are very specific to the config user has made in their device.
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 2:25 pm

I must admit it is difficult to know which Comments are actual Bugs confirmed by Mikrotik and which are not. Assuming users are reporting these things to Mikrotik in the proper way and not just posting here. Mikrotik have never posted an official Bug list. This feature would not only help us but stop a lot of negative posting which must be really be gut wrenching for the developers who work extremely hard and deserve a bit more credit for producing the worlds greatest routing OS. I will post a feature request for this. the more users that do the same the more chance Mikrotik will consider the idea
Unfortunately 90% of issues posted here, are never reported to support, even if we ask for more info. Many issues are config problems and some issues are very specific to the config user has made in their device.
Ticket#2014031766000331
6.10 BUG: user-manager profile limitation can not add profile limitation on command line when default admin customer are renamed, because missing "owner=" parameter.

Still present on x86, mpls, ppc [not try other] 6.12 2014/03/24 08:25:43 two verson later.

Anyone open winbox / ip / firewall on 6.11 can see misaligned active fields:
On 6.11 or 6.12 open Winbox 2.2.18 (download from mikrotik.com or from http://$routerboardip/ is the same)
Go to IP, Firewall, NAT,
Click on "+",
On General tab, click on any field,
The field are now aligned on the right and the space available is small.
Still present on x86,mipsle,ppc [not try other] 6.12 2014/03/24 08:25:43

I must try on new 6.12: "The winbox service over pppoe from 6.8 are unstable, worst from 6.10 and 6.11".
I'm not sure if is solved on x86 6.12 2014/03/24 08:25:43 two verson later.
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24276
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 2:29 pm

6.11 another version to skip?
Seem to yes. And i think it will be good - skip all versions with a new PPP package and new features up to 6.18 at least. If You do not want be beta tester of Muikrotik, of course. We will have stable version in about a year with this style of development
What problems do you have in v6.11?
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24276
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 2:31 pm

E-mail with tickets is rather... old solution. Other users can't see my problem(s) and if they have it also, they could leave their observations on bug track. Atlassian Jira or something different and many problems could be gone.
This has been discussed. Most of the reports are not bugs. Bug tracker would quickly fill up with false reports and config problems, and cause panic among other users.
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24276
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 2:32 pm

What about the bug in SSTP (Mikrotik server, connecting from windows 7/8 client)? It simply stopped working in 6.8 and higher. I am still using 6.7.
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=81644
Is the issue still there, or can somebody claim, it works again?
Thx
SSTP problems were fixed in v6.9, it works fine in v6.11 also.
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 2:34 pm

6.11 another version to skip?
Seem to yes. And i think it will be good - skip all versions with a new PPP package and new features up to 6.18 at least. If You do not want be beta tester of Muikrotik, of course. We will have stable version in about a year with this style of development
What problems do you have in v6.11?
some_bug_togheter.PNG
Some of the problems, with ticket already opened from 6.10:
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 00#p417209
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24276
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 2:41 pm

  • NTP package has not been changed (zero commits) for the last year at least. Please check if your NTP server is responding, or try a different NTP server.
  • Winbox field width is a bug, and is confirmed, don't worry, it will not remain like this.
Everyone please stick to topic. Unrelated complaints should be posted in a different topic or emailed to MikroTik.
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
visalink
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:42 am

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 2:41 pm

E-mail with tickets is rather... old solution. Other users can't see my problem(s) and if they have it also, they could leave their observations on bug track. Atlassian Jira or something different and many problems could be gone.
This has been discussed. Most of the reports are not bugs. Bug tracker would quickly fill up with false reports and config problems, and cause panic among other users.
Normis, and these are bugs?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by visalink on Tue Mar 25, 2014 2:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 2:42 pm

... cause panic among other users ...
Cause more panic seeing old bug (with ticket) not solved, and continuosly discovering new, with new version.

You staff never think about:
6. odd = stable, fixed all bug already discovered, and no single one new features. code untouched, only for fix bug.
6. even = for relasing and testing new features?
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24276
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 2:43 pm

MikroTik do not do any QA whatsoever and rely on the
This version was running on several hundred volunteer networks for more than a week, before we released it. The bugs that are found here only are apparent in very specific situations, and don't apply to everybody.
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 2:48 pm

... NTP package has not been changed (zero commits) for the last year at least. Please check if your NTP server is responding, or try a different NTP server. ...
Exactly, you have right, there is no problem in NTP packages, if you not put ntp client on CPE can obtain IP trough pppoe-client, tested on 6.8.....6.12

But if the ntp client are configured on CPE can obtain IP trough pppoe-client, sometime ntp-client stop working, are worst from 6.11
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 2:51 pm

MikroTik do not do any QA whatsoever and rely on the
This version was running on several hundred volunteer networks for more than a week, before we released it. The bugs that are found here only are apparent in very specific situations, and don't apply to everybody.
How is possible this 6.8~6.10 bug (fixed from 6.11rc1 v4):
*) ppp - mppe encryption together with mrru locked the router;
Never happen with testers, how many specific situations is? :shock:

But do not worry, from some weeks I am inside the group of volunteer.... :lol:
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 2:54 pm

For Normis only:

Es ceru, ka ne apvainot, neprot angļu valodu, mans negribēja būt pretrunas.

Es atvainojos, tikai gadījumā, ja es aizvainojis tevi.

Paldies vēlreiz.
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
drank
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 1:50 pm
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:00 pm

This version was running on several hundred volunteer networks for more than a week, before we released it. The bugs that are found here only are apparent in very specific situations, and don't apply to everybody.
There is a difference between running a software and testing the software. Testing implies focus on finding bugs and regressions in ALL subsystems. Running only slightly touches some of the subsystems. Your answer proves the point that MT is lacking in the QA dep. I hope this does not get deleted as well :)

Best regards
My setup: RB951G-2HnD, RouterOS v6.10
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24276
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:03 pm

This version was running on several hundred volunteer networks for more than a week, before we released it. The bugs that are found here only are apparent in very specific situations, and don't apply to everybody.
There is a difference between running a software and testing the software. Testing implies focus on finding bugs and regressions in ALL subsystems. Running only slightly touches some of the subsystems. Your answer proves the point that MT is lacking in the QA dep. I hope this does not get deleted as well :)

Best regards
I can assure you, all kinds of testing is done prior to release. You are still missing the point. Most of the posts here are not bugs.

Drank, do you have any issues in v6.11? Have you already emailed MikroTik support?
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:04 pm

This version was running on several hundred volunteer networks for more than a week, before we released it. The bugs that are found here only are apparent in very specific situations, and don't apply to everybody.
There is a difference between running a software and testing the software. Testing implies focus on finding bugs and regressions in ALL subsystems. Running only slightly touches some of the subsystems. Your answer proves the point that MT is lacking in the QA dep. I hope this does not get deleted as well :)

Best regards
PLEASE, now we must stop complain.
Expend your time, instead, to case study on bug, and how exactly duplicate the problem.
AND WHEN YOU CAN DUPLICATE THE BUG, SEND THE PROCEDURE BY E-MAIL to support@mikrotik.com
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
drank
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 1:50 pm
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:14 pm

Drank, do you have any issues in v6.11? Have you already emailed MikroTik support?
No, since I have not yet upgraded to 6.11. But OK, I will, so that I do not speak without facts. I can always revert to 6.10, right?

Thanks and best regards :)
My setup: RB951G-2HnD, RouterOS v6.10
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:16 pm

I have just rebooted my CPE with 6.12alpha at my home, for test winbox/pppoe-client bug posted before in this thread, for see if are solved.

Too much time the users have problem with (for example) 6.5 but never install 6.11 WITH CLEAN INSTALLATION AND CLEAN RECONFIGURATION for see if the problem are solved or not.
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:22 pm

:cry: :cry: :cry: the problem is still present on 6.12 "alpha"
winbox on pc directly connected on ethernet on gateway
inside the gateway are a pppoe-server mppe encrypted with mrru 1614
remote cpe (over various other machine) are taking ip address from pppoe-client

the winbox link from pc to cpe freeze after some kb of traffic inbound from cpe to pc.

Must revert to 6.7 for make disappear this bug.
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24276
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:23 pm

:cry: :cry: :cry: the problem is still present on 6.12 "alpha"
winbox on pc directly connected on ethernet on gateway
inside the gateway are a pppoe-server mppe encrypted with mrru 1614
remote cpe (over various other machine) are taking ip address from pppoe-client

the winbox link from pc to cpe freeze after some kb of traffic inbound from cpe to pc.

Must revert to 6.7 to disappear this bug.

Tell me your Support ticket number, I will check if there is any progress with your report
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:28 pm

:cry: :cry: :cry: the problem is still present on 6.12 "alpha"
winbox on pc directly connected on ethernet on gateway
inside the gateway are a pppoe-server mppe encrypted with mrru 1614
remote cpe (over various other machine) are taking ip address from pppoe-client

the winbox link from pc to cpe freeze after some kb of traffic inbound from cpe to pc.

Must revert to 6.7 to disappear this bug.

Tell me your Support ticket number, I will check if there is any progress with your report
(I hope your read my previous message for you)


I like to be extreme precise with bug report,
please see:
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 00#p411334 (I miss the ticket number in the post, but are solved on 6.11)
and
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 00#p417160 (not solved from 6.6)
for example.

I must write the exact procedure of how duplicate the problem, before send to support.

The email sended to support have exact the same detail as in the posts.

Thanks for your attention.
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
patrickmkt
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 157
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 5:21 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:34 pm


Unfortunately 90% of issues posted here, are never reported to support, even if we ask for more info. Many issues are config problems and some issues are very specific to the config user has made in their device.
Normis, how can you do a supout of a router but omitting private information like password and keys? Not that I don't trust you, but it will go against our security policy. And I can't afford to have a spare unit of each single router to create a second config without sensitive info just to do a test for you and send a supout.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24276
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:35 pm


Unfortunately 90% of issues posted here, are never reported to support, even if we ask for more info. Many issues are config problems and some issues are very specific to the config user has made in their device.
Normis, how can you do a supout of a router but omitting private information like password and keys? Not that I don't trust you, but it will go against our security policy. And I can't afford to have a spare unit of each single router to create a second config without sensitive info just to do a test for you and send a supout.
passwords and keys are not included in these files. you can already check what the file contains if you log into your mikrotik.com account, and use the "supout.rif viewer" tool.
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 3:39 pm

the problem is still present on 6.12 "alpha"
winbox on pc directly connected on ethernet on gateway
inside the gateway are a pppoe-server mppe encrypted with mrru 1614
remote cpe (over various other machine) are taking ip address from pppoe-client

the winbox link from pc to cpe freeze after some kb of traffic inbound from cpe to pc.

Must revert to 6.7 for make disappear this bug.
Disable encryption over pppoe-client (with no MRRU, MRRU=1600 or MRRU=1614 not matter) solve the problem. :o
Also the NTP work again as expected disabling pppoe-client encription. :shock:

I tink the problem are on new mppe encryption packages maded from 6.8, 8)
in same way obstruct "output" chain from packet generated by router services...

[process ppp-mppe on tool / profile go to 50% CPU without any traffic...
like to be connected with this bug already solved:
*) ppp - mppe encryption together with mrru locked the router;]
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
Insider
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 200
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 4:51 pm
Location: Czech
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 4:54 pm

RB 2011 UAS under 6.11 after some period CPU 100load, then it exits some services.. Hard to reboot remotely.. take long time.. Solution downgrade back to 6.9
Frequency microwave transvertors, design, development, manufacture
http://Pojitko.cz
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 5:25 pm

[Ticket#2014032566001217]
BUG 6.12: Replicable kernel crash when try to discover why winbox not working well from 6.8 over IP obtained from pppoe-client

Hi,

when I try to replicate this problem:
"Winbox connection freeze after some kb received over mppe encrypted connection"
RouterOS version affected: all from 6.8, 6.9, 6.10, 6.11, 6.12 (2014/03/24)
From 6.10 the problem go worst.
I get continuosly kernel failure and routerboard reboot with this configuration:

For this example I use one RB1100AHx2 and one RB951G-2HnD,
netinstalled with ***NO*** Keep old configuration and routeros-powerpc-6.12.npk / routeros-mipsbe-6.12.npk
both have last 3.10 / 3.12 bios.

The connection maded with ethernet cable are:

PC -> PoE - > ether13 RB1100AHx2
RB1100AHx2 ether2 -> RB951G-2HnD ether2
power jack -> RB951G-2HnD

The PoE and the ethernet cable do not matter, also tried to change.

RB1100AHx2 and RB951G-2HnD:
after netinstall
disable all packages except for:
routeros-powerpc / routeros-mipsbe
ppp
system
and reboot

paste this on RB1100AHx2 terminal

ros code

/interface eoip
add keepalive=10 local-address=192.168.3.1 mac-address=02:AE:6D:55:61:E2 name=eoip-tunnel1 remote-address=192.168.3.2 tunnel-id=666
/interface bridge settings
set use-ip-firewall=yes
/interface pppoe-server server
add authentication=mschap2 default-profile=default-encryption disabled=no interface=eoip-tunnel1 mrru=1614 service-name=service1
/ip address
add address=192.168.2.1/24 interface=ether13 network=192.168.2.0
add address=192.168.3.1/24 interface=ether2 network=192.168.3.0
/ip firewall connection tracking
set enabled=yes
/ppp secret
add local-address=10.0.0.1 name=test password=test profile=default-encryption remote-address=10.0.0.2
/system identity
set name="Test Gateway"
paste this on RB951G-2HnD terminal

ros code

/interface eoip
add keepalive=10 local-address=192.168.3.2 mac-address=02:08:2C:28:55:D6 name=eoip-tunnel1 remote-address=192.168.3.1 tunnel-id=666
/interface pppoe-client
add ac-name="" add-default-route=yes allow=mschap2 default-route-distance=1 dial-on-demand=no disabled=no interface=eoip-tunnel1 keepalive-timeout=60 max-mru=1480 max-mtu=1480 mrru=1614 name=pppoe-out1 password=test profile=default-encryption \
    service-name="" use-peer-dns=yes user=test
/interface bridge settings
set use-ip-firewall=yes
/ip address
add address=192.168.3.2/24 interface=ether2 network=192.168.3.0
/ip firewall connection tracking
set enabled=yes
/system identity
set name="Test CPE"
When you open with winbox 10.0.0.2 [after 1 hour, or 1 minutes are equal]
the RB1100AHx2 continuosly reboot / freeze without creating any autosupout.rif,
but with kernel failure on log and on terminal on serial port:
[admin@Test Gateway] /file> Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#1]
SMP NR_CPUS=2 RB1120
NIP: 8021a730 LR: 8021a46c CTR: 00000000
REGS: dffefd30 TRAP: 0700   Not tainted  (3.3.5-smp)
MSR: 00029000 <CE,EE,ME>  CR: 42000028  XER: 20000000
TASK = 8036d3c0[0] 'swapper/0' THREAD: 80380000 CPU: 0
GPR00: 8021a46c dffefde0 8036d3c0 fffffff2 de6f58aa 00000001 de6f4e50 dc870cd2
GPR08: 120ff29a 0000001d 00000000 8021a400 42000022 00000001 dd9fc300 00000012
GPR16: 00000003 00000000 e1811a40 000005e2 de6dd414 e1811a2c e18119c8 e18119ec
GPR24: 00000012 e1811828 de6dd484 0000003b 000000fd dd9fc300 dd9fc300 de6dd3c0
NIP [8021a730] __pskb_pull_tail+0x330/0x340
LR [8021a46c] __pskb_pull_tail+0x6c/0x340
Call Trace:
[dffefde0] [8021a46c] __pskb_pull_tail+0x6c/0x340 (unreliable)
[dffefe00] [e180df30] ppp_register_channel+0xb20/0x1b4c [ppp_generic@0xe180c000]
[dffefe30] [e180f8d4] ppp_output_wakeup+0x978/0xa20 [ppp_generic@0xe180c000]
[dffefe90] [e180fb30] ppp_input+0xf0/0x12a4 [ppp_generic@0xe180c000]
[dffefeb0] [e18494d0] 0xe18494d0 [pppoe@0xe1849000]
[dffefed0] [80221f9c] __netif_receive_skb+0x220/0x400
[dffeff30] [802224a0] process_backlog+0xac/0x178
[dffeff60] [80223870] net_rx_action+0xc0/0x170
[dffeffa0] [80031a14] __do_softirq+0xf4/0x178
[dffefff0] [8000c054] call_do_softirq+0x14/0x24
[80381e80] [80003f5c] do_softirq+0x98/0xc4
[80381ea0] [80031d84] irq_exit+0xa0/0xd4
[80381eb0] [80003c44] do_IRQ+0x94/0x190
[80381ee0] [8000d71c] ret_from_except+0x0/0x18
--- Exception: 501 at cpu_idle+0x8c/0xe0
    LR = cpu_idle+0x8c/0xe0
[80381fc0] [8034076c] start_kernel+0x2d4/0x2e8
[80381ff0] [800003f8] skpinv+0x2e4/0x320
Instruction dump:
7fdcf378 3b400000 4bffffa0 7fc3f378 7c84f850 4bfffced 2f830000 409eff9c
7f43d378 4bffe9c9 38600000 4bffff00 <0fe00000> 38c00001 7cc903a6 4bfffd90
---[ end trace 72421d3cf3d534d4 ]---

Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt

panicSaver: dumping panic to flash
flash: erase 10
flash: prg 10
flash: prg err 0
Rebooting in 1 seconds..
------------[ cut here ]------------
Kernel BUG at 800a3a70 [verbose debug info unavailable]
Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#2]
SMP NR_CPUS=2 RB1120
NIP: 800a3a70 LR: 800113ec CTR: 00000000
REGS: dffefa60 TRAP: 0700   Tainted: G      D       (3.3.5-smp)
MSR: 00021000 <CE,ME>  CR: 22000024  XER: 20000000
TASK = 8036d3c0[0] 'swapper/0' THREAD: 80380000 CPU: 0
GPR00: 800113ec dffefb10 8036d3c0 00001000 00000001 00000001 e1000000 edffc000
GPR08: 000000d0 80017554 00000300 fffffffd 22000024 00000001 dd9fc300 00000012
GPR16: 00000003 00000000 e1811a40 000005e2 de6dd414 e1811a2c e18119c8 e18119ec
GPR24: 80017554 80380000 e1000000 edffc000 000000d0 00000001 00000001 80017554
NIP [800a3a70] __get_vm_area_node.isra.31+0x34/0x180
LR [800113ec] __ioremap_caller+0x170/0x1a4
Call Trace:
[dffefb10] [e137c43c] flash_fixed_cmd+0x140/0x204 [flash@0xe137b000] (unreliable
)
[dffefb40] [800113ec] __ioremap_caller+0x170/0x1a4
[dffefb70] [80017554] rb1120_restart+0x68/0xa4
[dffefb90] [8000b35c] machine_restart+0x48/0x60
[dffefbb0] [802ad3b0] panic+0x198/0x1e8
[dffefc00] [800096b4] die+0x244/0x284
[dffefc30] [8000984c] _exception+0x100/0x114
[dffefd20] [8000d6d0] ret_from_except_full+0x0/0x4c
--- Exception: 700 at __pskb_pull_tail+0x330/0x340
    LR = __pskb_pull_tail+0x6c/0x340
[dffefe00] [e180df30] ppp_register_channel+0xb20/0x1b4c [ppp_generic@0xe180c000]
[dffefe30] [e180f8d4] ppp_output_wakeup+0x978/0xa20 [ppp_generic@0xe180c000]
[dffefe90] [e180fb30] ppp_input+0xf0/0x12a4 [ppp_generic@0xe180c000]
[dffefeb0] [e18494d0] 0xe18494d0 [pppoe@0xe1849000]
[dffefed0] [80221f9c] __netif_receive_skb+0x220/0x400
[dffeff30] [802224a0] process_backlog+0xac/0x178
[dffeff60] [80223870] net_rx_action+0xc0/0x170
[dffeffa0] [80031a14] __do_softirq+0xf4/0x178
[dffefff0] [8000c054] call_do_softirq+0x14/0x24
[80381e80] [80003f5c] do_softirq+0x98/0xc4
[80381ea0] [80031d84] irq_exit+0xa0/0xd4
[80381eb0] [80003c44] do_IRQ+0x94/0x190
[80381ee0] [8000d71c] ret_from_except+0x0/0x18
--- Exception: 501 at cpu_idle+0x8c/0xe0
    LR = cpu_idle+0x8c/0xe0
[80381fc0] [8034076c] start_kernel+0x2d4/0x2e8
[80381ff0] [800003f8] skpinv+0x2e4/0x320
Instruction dump:
9421ffd0 bf010010 542a0024 90010034 7c9d2378 7cbe2b78 7cda3378 814a000c
7cfb3b78 7d1c4378 7d384b78 554a016e <0f0a0000> 70a90001 41820018 7c690034
---[ end trace 72421d3cf3d534d5 ]---
I hope that I've explained everything well and sufficently detailed all.

Thanks to all.
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
User avatar
lancang76
just joined
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 7:12 am

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 5:46 pm

:cry: http://forum.mikrotik.com/posting.php?mode=smilies&f=1#

Normis, Your upgrade version 6.11 Truly BIG PROBLEM with Hotspot Features

nOw back to 6.10

Please check it my support it
Tq
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 6:09 pm

:cry: http://forum.mikrotik.com/posting.php?mode=smilies&f=1#

Normis, Your upgrade version 6.11 Truly BIG PROBLEM with Hotspot Features

nOw back to 6.10

Please check it my support it
Tq

YOU MUST WRITE AND SEND AUTOSUPOUT TO support@mikrotik.com
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 6:15 pm

:cry: http://forum.mikrotik.com/posting.php?mode=smilies&f=1#

Normis, Your upgrade version 6.11 Truly BIG PROBLEM with Hotspot Features

nOw back to 6.10

Please check it my support it
Tq

YOU MUST WRITE AND SEND AUTOSUPOUT TO support@mikrotik.com
and also write (to support) what problem you have encountered, not limited to "nOw back to 6.10".
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
User avatar
vadimbn
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 6:41 pm
Location: Russia, Berdsk
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 6:33 pm


Seem to yes. And i think it will be good - skip all versions with a new PPP package and new features up to 6.18 at least. If You do not want be beta tester of Muikrotik, of course. We will have stable version in about a year with this style of development
What problems do you have in v6.11?
For example - [Ticket#2014021466000802] - Permanent disconnections from Winbox via tunnels and non stable tunnels. This problem is actual for all versions newer than 6.7. My beautiful RB1100AHx2 works in far datacenter and i already afraid to install updates of ROS. I tried to update up to 6.9 and 6.10 - but every time was forced to downgrade to 6.7.

I repeat - you made beautiful and wonderful routers with good architecture, i can do more and more configurations with it. But these small and numerous bugs spoils everything.
Veni. Vidi. Feci.
RBSXTLTE3-7, CRS326-24G-2S+RM, RB850Gx2, RBMRTG, RB1100AHx4, RB750Gr3, RBD52G-5HacD2HnD-TC, Woobm-USB
 
tom211
just joined
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 12:07 am

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 6:45 pm

Hey, thanks for deleting my post!

This just shows me that my decision is right.
SSTP problems were fixed in v6.9, it works fine in v6.11 also.
Just for the records to stick to the topic: SSTP is broken again, no connection from 6.11/6.10 (client) to 6.11 (server); just getting "internal error (6)"
Last edited by tom211 on Tue Mar 25, 2014 6:51 pm, edited 3 times in total.
 
User avatar
lancang76
just joined
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 7:12 am

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 6:46 pm

oh 'thank you, I'll send it to support,
my problem 'after some time hotspot menu is gone, and as a direct connection without dhcp and login page.

see log

You can be the same problem as me

tq
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
Clauu
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 205
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:27 pm
Location: RO

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 10:06 pm

Having fun with RB850Gx2, RB2011UiAS-2HnD, RB260GSP, RB751U-2HnD, CRS112, RB3011UiAS, hAP ac, cAP ac and hAP ac². More others on the way :-)
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Mar 25, 2014 10:12 pm

Do not bring back 2009 post, when the solution are already written inside.
Have you read the whole thread?
To get support for the card, you have to write e-mail to support, where you should send supout.rif file, where 6.11 version is installed and card is plugged in. Support e-mail is support@mikrotik.com
(original reply message adapted from 2009 to 2014)
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
ddejager
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:13 am

Re: v6.11 released

Wed Mar 26, 2014 12:07 am

I upgraded my RB2011UAS-2HnD from 6.0 to 6.11. All works ok, though I also see the Winbox formatting problem that everyone else reports.

I do observe one strange thing: I have some Ethernet switch ports that are slaves to other masters. In all cases after upgrading traffic is being shown on the slave ports rather than the master ports (unless there is active Ethernet activity on the master port). Is this a change? I thought that previously no traffic was reported on the slave ports. Can I be sure that even though traffic is being reported on the slave ports that LAN traffic between two switch ports is not going through the router's CPU?
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Wed Mar 26, 2014 12:16 am

I upgraded my RB2011UAS-2HnD from 6.0 to 6.11. All works ok, though I also see the Winbox formatting problem that everyone else reports.

I do observe one strange thing: I have some Ethernet switch ports that are slaves to other masters. In all cases after upgrading traffic is being shown on the slave ports rather than the master ports (unless there is active Ethernet activity on the master port). Is this a change? I thought that previously no traffic was reported on the slave ports. Can I be sure that even though traffic is being reported on the slave ports that LAN traffic between two switch ports is not going through the router's CPU?
Is a new feature from 6.5 to report the traffic,
*) ethernet interface stats that are behind switch chip
show real hw stats instead of just the traffic that goes through cpu;
remember to update also the firmware!!!
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
jkarras
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 224
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 3:07 am
Location: Utah, USA

Re: v6.11 released

Wed Mar 26, 2014 6:13 am

E-mail with tickets is rather... old solution. Other users can't see my problem(s) and if they have it also, they could leave their observations on bug track. Atlassian Jira or something different and many problems could be gone.
This has been discussed. Most of the reports are not bugs. Bug tracker would quickly fill up with false reports and config problems, and cause panic among other users.
Normis other tech companies I have dealt with professionally have bug tracking systems that are open to anyone (Cisco to name one). The bugs are not submitted by end users but by the development teams or other authorized individuals at the company. They are then referenced by tech support when looking for issues. Not all bugs are immediately publicly viewable. Once a bug has been fully confirmed and understood by the dev team the bug is opened up to the public. The bug record contains workaround instructions if available, version numbers affected, and versions that the bug is fixed in. I don't know that anyone is expecting user submitted bugs in a bug tracker like say an opensource project does. Typically those systems are also doubling as a issue tracker.

Folks just want straight forward answers about bugs that do exist so they can be worked around in their environment. When the limitations of the device or the software version that is being deployed are known it gives a lot more confidence in deploying it. If there are a lot of unknown issues or stigma attached to a version its hard to want to deploy it. A publicly viewable bug tracker is as much about managing expectations and rumors as it is about reducing support calls. It also builds trust in the company and their products.
 
npero
Member
Member
Posts: 316
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:59 pm
Location: Serbia

Re: v6.11 released

Wed Mar 26, 2014 8:35 am

Anyone can confirm this bug:
1. Not very important, upgrade to 6.11 Groove, SxLite, RB711, lost default LED indication for wireless signal strength. On RB411 try to add new LED, LED appears as unknown closing, open again new led windows in WinBox help to back to normal.

2. Before last couple version have problem with OpenVPN in bridge configuration, no problem with connection. Network is bridged connect to OpenVPN also bridge configuration have access to all device in bridge network but can't access device where is OpenVPN server, other device in network is accessible. But connect to other device in network can connect to MT where is OpenVPN server check bridge and OpenVPN client is in the bridge. This is on x86 tested again on RB433GL also 6.11 some thing happens.

Any one see this problem.

Of course send supout to support waiting answer.
 
User avatar
honzam
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2293
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:27 pm
Location: Czech Republic

Re: v6.11 released

Wed Mar 26, 2014 8:57 am

Normis other tech companies I have dealt with professionally have bug tracking systems that are open to anyone (Cisco to name one). The bugs are not submitted by end users but by the development teams or other authorized individuals at the company. They are then referenced by tech support when looking for issues. Not all bugs are immediately publicly viewable. Once a bug has been fully confirmed and understood by the dev team the bug is opened up to the public. The bug record contains workaround instructions if available, version numbers affected, and versions that the bug is fixed in. I don't know that anyone is expecting user submitted bugs in a bug tracker like say an opensource project does. Typically those systems are also doubling as a issue tracker.

Folks just want straight forward answers about bugs that do exist so they can be worked around in their environment. When the limitations of the device or the software version that is being deployed are known it gives a lot more confidence in deploying it. If there are a lot of unknown issues or stigma attached to a version its hard to want to deploy it. A publicly viewable bug tracker is as much about managing expectations and rumors as it is about reducing support calls. It also builds trust in the company and their products.
+1
LAN, FTTx, Wireless. ISP operator
 
User avatar
cbrown
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 1840
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:57 pm
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Wed Mar 26, 2014 12:34 pm

Normis other tech companies I have dealt with professionally have bug tracking systems that are open to anyone (Cisco to name one). The bugs are not submitted by end users but by the development teams or other authorized individuals at the company. They are then referenced by tech support when looking for issues. Not all bugs are immediately publicly viewable. Once a bug has been fully confirmed and understood by the dev team the bug is opened up to the public. The bug record contains workaround instructions if available, version numbers affected, and versions that the bug is fixed in. I don't know that anyone is expecting user submitted bugs in a bug tracker like say an opensource project does. Typically those systems are also doubling as a issue tracker.

Folks just want straight forward answers about bugs that do exist so they can be worked around in their environment. When the limitations of the device or the software version that is being deployed are known it gives a lot more confidence in deploying it. If there are a lot of unknown issues or stigma attached to a version its hard to want to deploy it. A publicly viewable bug tracker is as much about managing expectations and rumors as it is about reducing support calls. It also builds trust in the company and their products.
+1
+1
C.Brown

cbrown[at]ravenrocknetworks.com
MTCNA - MTCRE - MTCWE - MTCTCE
MTCSE - TRAINER-0179
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24276
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.11 released

Wed Mar 26, 2014 12:35 pm

Thank you all for the input!
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
Kadafi
newbie
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 5:52 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Wed Mar 26, 2014 1:37 pm

Still no COA in PPP...
Even new ppp package.
Yes.
All of our hardware support COA, but not RouterOS. No new features, only bugs with new versions.
Wny not use accel-ppp? In-kernel supported out of the box, just binary daemon needed.
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Wed Mar 26, 2014 2:30 pm

Anyone can confirm this bug:
1. Not very important, upgrade to 6.11 Groove, SxLite, RB711, lost default LED indication for wireless signal strength. On RB411 try to add new LED, LED appears as unknown closing, open again new led windows in WinBox help to back to normal.

2. Before last couple version have problem with OpenVPN in bridge configuration, no problem with connection. Network is bridged connect to OpenVPN also bridge configuration have access to all device in bridge network but can't access device where is OpenVPN server, other device in network is accessible. But connect to other device in network can connect to MT where is OpenVPN server check bridge and OpenVPN client is in the bridge. This is on x86 tested again on RB433GL also 6.11 some thing happens.

Any one see this problem.

Of course send supout to support waiting answer.
1) I confirm the bug, I must write how to replicate the problem and send to support@mikrotik.com

2) I not test this problem.
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
McTedson
newbie
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:04 pm
Location: .ro

Re: v6.11 released

Wed Mar 26, 2014 2:34 pm

Anyone can confirm this bug:
2. Before last couple version have problem with OpenVPN in bridge configuration, no problem with connection. Network is bridged connect to OpenVPN also bridge configuration have access to all device in bridge network but can't access device where is OpenVPN server, other device in network is accessible. But connect to other device in network can connect to MT where is OpenVPN server check bridge and OpenVPN client is in the bridge. This is on x86 tested again on RB433GL also 6.11 some thing happens.

Any one see this problem.

Of course send supout to support waiting answer.
+1
I am stuck with 6.7 where this works ok, just because.
Example

OVPN client (192.168.1.231) ---> OVPN Server (192.168.1.1) - bridge ------> lan 192.168.1.0/24

client can ping anyone in lan, lan can ping client, client cannot ping 192.168.1.1 .
As such , i cannot use 192.168.1.1 to route to other subnets that the 192.168.1.1 server knows about since it's not reachable.
In 6.7 it works ok.
 
psajdak
just joined
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:42 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Wed Mar 26, 2014 4:23 pm

Hello i have this problem:
mt.JPG
this is not fixed?
What's new in 6.11 (2014-Mar-20 09:16):

*) ipsec - fix aes-cbc hardware acceleration on CCR with key sizes 192 and 256;
*) wireless - add auto frequency feature;
*) ovpn - fixed TLS renegotiation;
*) ovpn - make bridge mode work with big packets (do not leave extraneous padding);
*) ovpn - fixed require-client-certifcate;
*) ppp - revert RADIUS NAS-Port behaviour, report tunnel interface id;
*) ppp - mppe encryption together with mrru locked the router;
*) dhcp - added support for DHCP option 138 - list of CAPWAP IPv4 servers;
*) quickset - added Guest Network setup to Home AP mode;
*) console - no longer required to supply value of '/routing bgp instance vrf'
property 'instance' for 'add' command;
*) ethernet - added option to enable rx/tx flow control
(will be disabled by default);
*) ethernet - added ability to specify advertised modes for copper ports;
*) fixed 100% cpu usage on CCRs;
*) ssl - not finding CRL in local store for any certificate in trust chain will cause connection to fail;
*) lte - support for Huawei ME609 and ME909u-521;
In 6.10 openvpn dont work good, 6.11 work very good but only one day, now i have this error.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
plisken
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2425
Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 12:24 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Wed Mar 26, 2014 8:00 pm

Ntp hangs on reached
 
lyma
just joined
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 4:00 am
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Mar 27, 2014 12:54 am

E-mail with tickets is rather... old solution. Other users can't see my problem(s) and if they have it also, they could leave their observations on bug track. Atlassian Jira or something different and many problems could be gone.
This has been discussed. Most of the reports are not bugs. Bug tracker would quickly fill up with false reports and config problems, and cause panic among other users.
Normis other tech companies I have dealt with professionally have bug tracking systems that are open to anyone (Cisco to name one). The bugs are not submitted by end users but by the development teams or other authorized individuals at the company. They are then referenced by tech support when looking for issues. Not all bugs are immediately publicly viewable. Once a bug has been fully confirmed and understood by the dev team the bug is opened up to the public. The bug record contains workaround instructions if available, version numbers affected, and versions that the bug is fixed in. I don't know that anyone is expecting user submitted bugs in a bug tracker like say an opensource project does. Typically those systems are also doubling as a issue tracker.

Folks just want straight forward answers about bugs that do exist so they can be worked around in their environment. When the limitations of the device or the software version that is being deployed are known it gives a lot more confidence in deploying it. If there are a lot of unknown issues or stigma attached to a version its hard to want to deploy it. A publicly viewable bug tracker is as much about managing expectations and rumors as it is about reducing support calls. It also builds trust in the company and their products.
+1
 
User avatar
Maggiore81
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 221
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:10 pm
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Mar 27, 2014 12:14 pm

Upgraded RB951-2n from 6.10 to 6.11
Bridge network and wlan1 interface disappears.
reboot and it works normal. after a few minutes it disappears.
Dott. Elia Spadoni
---
Network Administrator,
MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCTCE, MTCINE, MTCWE
Spadhausen Internet Provider
Ravenna, ITALY
http://www.spadhausen.com
 
argeorge
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:14 pm
Location: Greece

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Mar 27, 2014 1:16 pm

Good morning, after upgrade I see this - the select box is not full width in WinBox. It's normal or bug? I didn't see this in earlier versions.
screenshot-ros.png
Same here
 
mpreissner
Member
Member
Posts: 356
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:16 pm
Location: Columbia, MD

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Mar 27, 2014 1:19 pm

I'm seeing an interesting issue with VLAN 1 since my upgrade to ROS 6.11. I have an RB751GL. I've passed VLAN 1 down to the switch chip, and have it trunked out ether2, and set up on ether4 as an access port. Ether2 goes to an RB260GS, and ether4 to my wireless AP. Since upgrading to 6.11, I can only ping either the RB260GS or my WAP, but never both. It seems to depend on which device was the most recent to go live on the network. If I reboot my WAP, then I can ping it, but I can no longer ping the 260GS. If I reboot the 260, then I can ping the 260, but I lose my WAP. If I reboot the 751, sometimes I'll get the 260, and sometimes I'll get the WAP, but never both. I'm considering downgrading to 6.10, as everything worked on that release, but I'd rather be on the latest version.

Has anyone else noticed this behavior?
Michael Preissner
CISSP, CCSP, CEH, PMP
 
User avatar
paoloaga
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 222
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:52 am
Location: Vaprio d'Agogna (NO) - Italy
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Mar 27, 2014 1:52 pm

I also think that a bug tracking tool is useful, not only for users who can save time knowing that a bug exist, but also for Mikrotik staff: if someone opens a bug which is not-really-a-bug, other users can leave a feedback helping both the first user and saving time to Mikrotik developers.

Moreover I don't think that customers would be scared, at least not more than reading the official forum. Every complex software has bugs.
 
voxframe
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 126
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 2:51 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Mar 27, 2014 2:47 pm

+1

Agreed.
Something needs to change. The current bug submission/tracking system is slow and does not have the ability for other users to see what is considered an active real bug, or user error.

I have no way to know if I am seeing a real bug until I submit a ticket, and wait... and wait... This is not acceptable in a live environment.
If there's a bug tracker, I can at least quickly check and see if anyone else has the same symptoms, and then I know if this could be a real bug, or I know if I need to check my settings.

Problem 2)
Normis, a lot of people don't bother to check their settings. You know this obviously. But the problem is, I have never seen MT release such bad firmware in the past. There are a LOT of unacceptable bugs in 6.x. Please STOP any development on future additions and concentrate on the bugs and more quality testing before releasing. Bugs are understandable, and unavoidable, but the quantity and severity of the ones being released lately are ridiculous. To make matters worse, because there is no official bug tracking system, users don't know if it's their fault or a global bug... But because of the reputation of 6.x, it's become pretty normal for clients to think it's a bug.

To make matters even worse, your changelog does not mention modules that were touched. Or they do not give proper explanations of the original bugs/fixes. There needs to be more information listed. Generic items like "Fixed PPPoE client timeout" doesn't mean anything useful. What was this bug? What caused it? Is there a workaround? These are all things that can be solved by a proper bug tracking system.

I love MT, and I can understand how hard it is for the developers to keep up with everything, but normis, you guys are supposed to be a professional company, and everything I have seen in the past few months looks very unprofessional. You have serious "carrier" grade equipment, it's time to start behaving like a "carrier" grade company as well.
 
bennyng
newbie
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2013 11:31 am

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Mar 27, 2014 3:44 pm

If you are already running a RouterOS 6 install, Simply click “Check for updates” in QuickSet, Webfig or Winbox packages menu.
What's new in 6.11 (2014-Mar-20 09:16):

*) ipsec - fix aes-cbc hardware acceleration on CCR with key sizes 192 and 256;
*) wireless - add auto frequency feature;
*) ovpn - fixed TLS renegotiation;
*) ovpn - make bridge mode work with big packets (do not leave extraneous padding);
*) ovpn - fixed require-client-certifcate;
*) ppp - revert RADIUS NAS-Port behaviour, report tunnel interface id;
*) ppp - mppe encryption together with mrru locked the router;
*) dhcp - added support for DHCP option 138 - list of CAPWAP IPv4 servers;
*) quickset - added Guest Network setup to Home AP mode;
*) console - no longer required to supply value of '/routing bgp instance vrf'
property 'instance' for 'add' command;
*) ethernet - added option to enable rx/tx flow control
(will be disabled by default);
*) ethernet - added ability to specify advertised modes for copper ports;
*) fixed 100% cpu usage on CCRs;
*) ssl - not finding CRL in local store for any certificate in trust chain will cause connection to fail;
*) lte - support for Huawei ME609 and ME909u-521;
Available separately, is a new Wireless-FP package, which includes the new CAPsMAN feature. This is a beta package, so use only in controlled test networks. The package will replace your default Wireless package upon installation, which means it will also add wireless functionality changes and improvements, not only CAPsMAN. More information about the Wireless Controller (CAPsMAN) is here: http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:CAPsMAN
Can you share more about " fixed 100% cpu usage on CCRs", what had been fixed, and what is the problem that related?
 
voxframe
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 126
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 2:51 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Mar 27, 2014 4:33 pm

I have never seen MT release such bad firmware in the past. There are a LOT of unacceptable bugs in 6
Can you please name a few ?
I don't remember exactly what versions, but all experienced in 6.x

1) Firmware bug on CRS that turns it into a hub.
2) Current winbox text box layout.
3) winbox - fixed problem where all previous session opened windows were read only;
4) Port flapping on CCR
5) MORE port flapping on CCR
6) ipsec, I don't even know where to start with this mess
7) ppp bridging mess

I'm not going to waste my time with an argument. Simply put, there needs to be a lot better quality control before releasing firmware. I know to expect small bugs when upgrading to latest versions. But not complete bullshit where I need to net-install or reset-export-reload etc. Or major bugs like above that completely break the functionality of modules (There have been more than what I listed, but I'm not wasting time doing it)

Simple message - You guys need to improve your bug ticket handling, and spend more time testing before allowing firmware to be released. Perhaps a "pre-release" and "stable" branch with proper known issues being listed? This was different when you were "a small company" building small boards. Now you call yourselves "enterprise" and "carrier"... It's time to behave like it!
 
nicklowe
just joined
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2013 5:06 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Mar 27, 2014 7:21 pm

A SSTP tunnel that I have between two Mikrotik routers broke after the upgrade to 6.11.
It is configured so that the client verifies the server certificate and the server verifies the client certificate.

The certificate and server certificate derive from the same root. The root is one that I generated.

I suspect that it is this that has caused the issue somehow:

*) ssl - not finding CRL in local store for any certificate in trust chain will cause connection to fail.

If there is no CRL defined on a certificate in the trust chain, does this still cause connections to fail? If so, I assume this would be a new bug.

(Having disabled certificate validation at both ends, the tunnel is established successfully.)
Just a quick update on this...

The issue that I experienced has been confirmed by support as a bug and will be fixed in 6.12. (It, however, may or may not be related to CRL handling. I was not given specifics about what the nature of the regression was, just that it has been identified and will be resolved.)

Cheers,

Nick
 
visalink
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:42 am

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Mar 27, 2014 7:26 pm

Simple message - You guys need to improve your bug ticket handling, and spend more time testing before allowing firmware to be released. Perhaps a "pre-release" and "stable" branch with proper known issues being listed? This was different when you were "a small company" building small boards. Now you call yourselves "enterprise" and "carrier"... It's time to behave like it!
voxframe
You are absolutely right.
 
Athan
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 89
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 2:48 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Mar 27, 2014 7:37 pm

Simple message - You guys need to improve your bug ticket handling, and spend more time testing before allowing firmware to be released. Perhaps a "pre-release" and "stable" branch with proper known issues being listed? This was different when you were "a small company" building small boards. Now you call yourselves "enterprise" and "carrier"... It's time to behave like it!
Well said!
Athan
 
steen
Member
Member
Posts: 469
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 2:15 am
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Mar 27, 2014 8:16 pm

Hello Folks!

I face issues since RoS6.7 and could not upgrade anything in production since.

I have made supout for the routing marks some while back, but can not play with production server so doing another test in production is out of question for weeks from now.

This parts still does not work:
* Routing mark does not work.
* L2TP passes only a few kilobytes before it stops working, opening a new sessions makes it work one more time. WinBox hangs when opening over L2TP tunnels.
* CRS is still leaking using the switch for vlan.
* Suddenly ethernet ports stop working/pass at random, traffic and sometimes start work again or router need to be rebooted.
* Then a long run bug, some devices ethernet port (RB411) does not work after upgrating from 5.X to 6.X, so customers is stuck to 5.20

I think it is nesesary to pause upgrades for the months ahead till Mikrotik engineers have sorted out all problems.
 
drank
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 1:50 pm
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Mar 27, 2014 8:19 pm

Can you please name a few ?
Normis, if this is a bickering then this does not do you any good. If not then again, why ask? You must know all your bugs and not ask you customers to provide the list.

It is obvious that you try to deny the existence of some bugs. It is also obvious that your customers are sure that there are bugs. Deploying a bug tracking system, with access to customers, will clear all this confusion. Continuing to deny that there are indeed bugs will not convince anybody here.

Think about it in this way - even if you're right and these are not bugs then MT failed to pass the message to the customers (obviously). This calls for some corrective actions from MT to fix the things. How do you intend to fix all this growing confusion and dissatisfaction with the quality of the releases and the QA process? Nobody says you're doing everything wrong. But that does not mean you're guaranteed you're doing it right. Sometimes it is better to admit, correct and continue.

Wish you all the best and thank you for trying to improve.
My setup: RB951G-2HnD, RouterOS v6.10
 
elgrandiegote
newbie
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Mar 27, 2014 8:55 pm

Can you please name a few ?
Normis, if this is a bickering then this does not do you any good. If not then again, why ask? You must know all your bugs and not ask you customers to provide the list.

It is obvious that you try to deny the existence of some bugs. It is also obvious that your customers are sure that there are bugs. Deploying a bug tracking system, with access to customers, will clear all this confusion. Continuing to deny that there are indeed bugs will not convince anybody here.

Think about it in this way - even if you're right and these are not bugs then MT failed to pass the message to the customers (obviously). This calls for some corrective actions from MT to fix the things. How do you intend to fix all this growing confusion and dissatisfaction with the quality of the releases and the QA process? Nobody says you're doing everything wrong. But that does not mean you're guaranteed you're doing it right. Sometimes it is better to admit, correct and continue.

Wish you all the best and thank you for trying to improve.
+1
 
myke1124
just joined
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:15 am

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:42 am

/interface wireless set 0 frequency=auto channel-width=20/40mhz-ht-below

interface wireless monitor 0                 
                 status: running-ap
                   band: 2ghz-n
              frequency: 2412MHz
      wireless-protocol: 802.11

This puts the ht below and computers have issues connecting.

Can we get channel-width=20/40mhz-ht-auto?
 
synnest
just joined
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 2:12 pm
Location: Tallinn

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:07 pm

Hotspot login page not working, clients get error opening page. Downgrading to 6.10 solved the problem.
 
fitless
just joined
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:01 pm
Location: RU\Moscow

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:08 pm

Upgraded RB951-2n from 6.10 to 6.11
Bridge network and wlan1 interface disappears.
reboot and it works normal. after a few minutes it disappears.
I think I have similar problem! After half or few days router became not accessible from network and only hard reboot can help. How to view LOG at that moment I don't know... but after reboot I see string like "unexpected reboot" in the LOG.

Somebody tell me where to download v6.10 for downgrading?
 
myke1124
just joined
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:15 am

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 28, 2014 3:54 pm

Upgraded RB951-2n from 6.10 to 6.11
Bridge network and wlan1 interface disappears.
reboot and it works normal. after a few minutes it disappears.
I think I have similar problem! After half or few days router became not accessible from network and only hard reboot can help. How to view LOG at that moment I don't know... but after reboot I see string like "unexpected reboot" in the LOG.

Somebody tell me where to download v6.10 for downgrading?
If you look at the download link to the current version, it provides a clue to the older versions.
http://download2.mikrotik.com/routeros/6.11/routeros-mipsbe-6.11.npk
Change both of the current version numbers in the link to the version number you want.
 
drank
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 1:50 pm
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 28, 2014 4:19 pm

My setup: RB951G-2HnD, RouterOS v6.10
 
Kencomp
just joined
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 11:28 am

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 28, 2014 4:49 pm

Hi Guys,

Love the fact you're now listing known bugs in the changes file. Maybe however you could list the bugs that you're going to introduce in the next version so that we have some indication in advance what's not going to work anymore!!!!!

V6.11 is SERIOUSLY damaged. It randomly loses EOIP tunnels, then replaces the port entry in the bridge with a PPPoE Client. Bridges and ports are also randomly forgotten. On Bridge Filters the input/output ports are lost if you press COPY and a whole hosts of issues that didn't exist in previous versions.

CONGRATULATIONS, you should patent this version, it's the first OS to successfully simulate Senile Dementia!!!!!ImageImage

PS Have sent the supout file to support
 
User avatar
paoloaga
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 222
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:52 am
Location: Vaprio d'Agogna (NO) - Italy
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 28, 2014 7:40 pm

I am writing a lot of software to automate various tasks, and I am getting crazy with lots of regexps to parse the "print terse" outputs.

Is it possible to implement a "print json" ?

for example:

> /system package print json
[{\"id\":\"0\",\"enable\":\"true\",\"name\":\"routing\",\"version\":\"6.1\",\"build-time\":\"jun/12/2013 11:50:54\",\"scheduled\":\"\"},
{\"id\":\"1\",\"enable\":\"true\",\"name\":\"dhcp\",\"version\":\"6.1\",\"build-time\":\"jun/12/2013 11:50:54\",\"scheduled\":\"\"},
{\"id\":\"2\",\"enable\":\"true\",\"name\":\"multicast\",\"version\":\"6.1\",\"build-time\":\"jun/12/2013 11:50:54\",\"scheduled\":\"\"},
{\"id\":\"3\",\"enable\":\"true\",\"name\":\"ipv6\",\"version\":\"6.1\",\"build-time\":\"jun/12/2013 11:50:54\",\"scheduled\":\"\"},
{\"id\":\"4\",\"enable\":\"true\",\"name\":\"security\",\"version\":\"6.1\",\"build-time\":\"jun/12/2013 11:50:54\",\"scheduled\":\"\"},
{\"id\":\"5\",\"enable\":\"true\",\"name\":\"advanced-tools\",\"version\":\"6.1\",\"build-time\":\"jun/12/2013 11:50:54\",\"scheduled\":\"\"},
{\"id\":\"6\",\"enable\":\"true\",\"name\":\"ntp\",\"version\":\"6.1\",\"build-time\":\"jun/12/2013 11:50:54\",\"scheduled\":\"\"},
{\"id\":\"7\",\"enable\":\"true\",\"name\":\"ppp\",\"version\":\"6.1\",\"build-time\":\"jun/12/2013 11:50:54\",\"scheduled\":\"\"},
{\"id\":\"8\",\"enable\":\"true\",\"name\":\"system\",\"version\":\"6.1\",\"build-time\":\"jun/12/2013 11:50:54\",\"scheduled\":\"\"}]

JSON is a widely used encoding and would take a lot of pain away when developing tools.
 
User avatar
boen_robot
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2411
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 4:43 pm
Location: europe://Bulgaria/Plovdiv

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 28, 2014 8:48 pm

I am writing a lot of software to automate various tasks, and I am getting crazy with lots of regexps to parse the "print terse" outputs.

Is it possible to implement a "print json" ?
There's the API protocol you know.
PEAR2_Net_RouterOS(1.0.0b6) - My API client in PHP
(Rate my posts? If you want... no pressure...)
 
User avatar
paoloaga
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 222
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:52 am
Location: Vaprio d'Agogna (NO) - Italy
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 28, 2014 10:26 pm

[/quote]There's the API protocol you know.[/quote]

Yes, but AFAIK it does not use a secure protocol like SSH. Does it?
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Mar 28, 2014 11:49 pm

Added support for API over TLS (SSL) from 6.1:
see on IP / Services / api-ssl
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
BeepDog
just joined
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:41 am

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 29, 2014 4:20 am

Posting here, so that others can know about it.

I just read through the entire thread, and I'm not certain if others are having the same problem I am. I have an RB800, and it's started crashing and rebooting for me at random times. Once while I was in the webUI, wondering why the CPU graph was spiking. The WebUI crawled to a halt, and I heard the watchdog beep as it rebooted the thing.

I've already made a supout.rif and sent it in, but I saw something else about autosupout.rif. I have one of those on my router as well, should I also email that in? The support page for Mikrotik.com doesn't indicate as such, and so I don't want to send in unneccessary things.

Otherwise, to add to the bugs for 6.x :), the MetaRouter no longer works :(

If the reboots keep happening, I may have to downgrade to 6.10, but I'd rather help get whatever is wrong fixed first.

Thanks for posting guys, and thanks MikroTik for responding when you can.
 
staslabs
newbie
Posts: 38
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 9:38 pm
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 29, 2014 11:40 am

6.11 on CCR-1036 is not stable - lock and freeze twice, after working for an hour after the upgrade. Went back to version 6.7 - its works stable
 
User avatar
colebert
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 187
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 3:45 am

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 29, 2014 12:45 pm

Another downvote for the new "dropbox" interface. It's bad.

I downgraded to get back the old look.
Amateurs built the Ark.
Professionals built the Titanic.
 
sdugoten
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:55 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 29, 2014 1:41 pm

Does anyone able to use the routing mark + the "Content" field working correctly ?

As soon as I add anything inside the field "Content", the connection will timeout . For example, if I type in "facebook" in the Content field, it supposed to mark the route if I go to http://www.facebook.com . And then eventually route to a VPN connection. However, the connection would time out as soon as I go to http://www.facebook.com.

However, if I take out the "Content" field and make it to mark the route unconditionally, when I go to http://www.facebook.com, it will route to the VPN correctly.

Therefore, it seems adding a condition will break the routing mark.

Image
 
User avatar
tomaskir
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 2:32 pm
Location: Slovakia

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 29, 2014 1:47 pm

Does anyone able to use the routing mark + the "Content" field working correctly ?

As soon as I add anything inside the field "Content", the connection will timeout . For example, if I type in "facebook" in the Content field, it supposed to mark the route if I go to http://www.facebook.com . And then eventually route to a VPN connection. However, the connection would time out as soon as I go to http://www.facebook.com.

However, if I take out the "Content" field and make it to mark the route unconditionally, when I go to http://www.facebook.com, it will route to the VPN correctly.

Therefore, it seems adding a condition will break the routing mark.
Going to HTTP facebook will automatically redirect you to HTTPS facebook.

Since its HTTPS, the router cant read the packet content (its encrypted), and therefore will NOT find "facebook" in the content, and not route the connection over the VPN.
Unimus - configuration management, automation and backup solution
Mass Config Push, network-wide RouterOS upgrades, and more!
 
sdugoten
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:55 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 29, 2014 1:54 pm

Does anyone able to use the routing mark + the "Content" field working correctly ?

As soon as I add anything inside the field "Content", the connection will timeout . For example, if I type in "facebook" in the Content field, it supposed to mark the route if I go to http://www.facebook.com . And then eventually route to a VPN connection. However, the connection would time out as soon as I go to http://www.facebook.com.

However, if I take out the "Content" field and make it to mark the route unconditionally, when I go to http://www.facebook.com, it will route to the VPN correctly.

Therefore, it seems adding a condition will break the routing mark.
Going to HTTP facebook will automatically redirect you to HTTPS facebook.

Since its HTTPS, the router cant read the packet content (its encrypted), and therefore will NOT find "facebook" in the content, and not route the connection over the VPN.
It doesn't matter what value you set in Content, it will time out. You can try to set "whatismyipaddress" to Content, and then try to go to whatismyipaddress.com. It will timeout.
 
hero12
just joined
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:34 am

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:34 pm

Hello,
I have found another problem with 6.11. In winbox' s bridge filter, the added interfaces disappeare after a few seconds. But there are available after editing the rules.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
Clauu
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 205
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:27 pm
Location: RO

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 29, 2014 5:10 pm

On the last ros 6.11 suddenly my lan bridge went out, it's just disappeared.. :shock: wth
LE. Seems like this is happening when you select a bridge in the pptp profile, a random bridge will get deleted..
Having fun with RB850Gx2, RB2011UiAS-2HnD, RB260GSP, RB751U-2HnD, CRS112, RB3011UiAS, hAP ac, cAP ac and hAP ac². More others on the way :-)
 
wrobli
just joined
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:39 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 29, 2014 8:05 pm

RB750, sxt, omnitik and 2011 upgraded without any problems.
 
User avatar
paoloaga
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 222
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:52 am
Location: Vaprio d'Agogna (NO) - Italy
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Mar 29, 2014 9:06 pm

Added support for API over TLS (SSL) from 6.1:
see on IP / Services / api-ssl
I am trying accessing this using Ruby and OpenSSL. All connection methods fail, except for SSLv2 which just hangs and doesn't allow me to proceed. Should this be considered a bug?

Has someone been able to connect to the SSL API using Ruby?
 
hero12
just joined
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:34 am

Re: v6.11 released

Sun Mar 30, 2014 1:08 am

And now i want do connect to my CCR and my password was reset to default :/ - reboot and all ok ????
 
argeorge
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:14 pm
Location: Greece

Re: v6.11 released

Sun Mar 30, 2014 2:17 am

For those had issues with routing marks,
i ve seen the issue after upgrading from 6.7 to 6.9,i guess the same happened with 6.10 and 6.11

I was not able to reproduce and show to mikrotik,
Although a possible fix(not 100% if that fixed the issue) is to downgrade to 5.26 and upgrade back to latest version

Regarding eoip and bridge interfaces disappearing as somebody said above, it happened on 6.10,
i was able to fix it with same solution(downgrade to 5.26 and upgrade to latest)

hope it helps...
 
sdugoten
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:55 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Sun Mar 30, 2014 9:52 am

For those had issues with routing marks,
i ve seen the issue after upgrading from 6.7 to 6.9,i guess the same happened with 6.10 and 6.11

I was not able to reproduce and show to mikrotik,
Although a possible fix(not 100% if that fixed the issue) is to downgrade to 5.26 and upgrade back to latest version

Regarding eoip and bridge interfaces disappearing as somebody said above, it happened on 6.10,
i was able to fix it with same solution(downgrade to 5.26 and upgrade to latest)

hope it helps...
I think the "Content" field is pretty reliable to reproduce even at v6.7 (the only known version work with routing mark). I just make a quick record here http://youtu.be/I5hLiX1sic8
As you can see in the video

1. At the beginning I have a working VPN to Japan, which you can see the IP from whatismyip.com

2. As soon as I add a value "whatismyip" in the Content field, you first notice the connection will timeout for at least 30 seconds before you can do anything.

3. After that "always broken 30 second timeout", The connection can go anywhere else except URL with string "whatismyip", which suppose any URL with string "whatismyip" should route to the Japan VPN, but instead it just timeout.

4. Take out the "Content" field will render the connection timeout for another 30 seconds before you can do anything.

5. After that "always broken 30 second timeout", Everything back to normal, I can access whatismyip.com with my Japan VPN just fine again.

So, basically, even if you have a working VPN setup with a working routing mark, as soon as you add *anything* in the Content field, the connection will timeout consistently when your URL consist of the value of the Content field. And the "always broken 30 second timeout" is another unknown why it is doing it.
 
babel
just joined
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 10:38 am

Re: v6.11 released

Sun Mar 30, 2014 1:47 pm

Hi!
I have a problems after upgrade on v6.11 on my RB751U-2HnD (firmware: v3.13):

Device just freeze every 3-4 hours - it`s very bad for my work. I do power of and on. Later i set IP adress in "watchdog" tab, and device reboot automaticaly and works fine 3-4 hours and history repeat.
I aways updgrade new version in this device when new release at soon, and i never not have problem. Whats wrong?

...But another my device RB751U-2HnD, and more different models works fine, but hes is works with a most simple configuration

Of cause? I don`t imagine my work without MikroTik! Perfectly product line!

Sorry for my Eng.. :o

Thanks!
Last edited by babel on Sun Mar 30, 2014 4:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
rainmaker
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:32 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Sun Mar 30, 2014 4:00 pm

Dear Friends
It will also be helpful to add thing that actually works
as per the changelog.
Thanks
l don't think mikrotik is totally bad. Even though they can do better.
Keep up the good work.

Please the whole world production is full of Bugs.
Cars ,Medicine and even Jets.
My 2 pesewas
 
patrick7
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 298
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 2:40 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Sun Mar 30, 2014 8:14 pm

What do you mean with "dropbox interface"?
 
BeepDog
just joined
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:41 am

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 31, 2014 7:23 am

Posting here, so that others can know about it.

I just read through the entire thread, and I'm not certain if others are having the same problem I am. I have an RB800, and it's started crashing and rebooting for me at random times. Once while I was in the webUI, wondering why the CPU graph was spiking. The WebUI crawled to a halt, and I heard the watchdog beep as it rebooted the thing.
Caught a log output screenshot when it bombed. And yes, I sent the autosupout.rif as well as a supout.rif to mikrotik. I haven't heard anything back, yet, and I'm not sure I will.
MikroTikFailureLog-cropped.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
sdv
just joined
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2013 9:30 am

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 31, 2014 9:14 am

ROS: 6.11
Board: RB1100AHx2
Role: IPSec AES-256 / L2TP-Server / OSPF
Tested bugs:
Performance degradation & spontaneously reboots.
Without any network load (ipsec only) /system resource print shows ~ 14-18% CPU usage.
While bandwidth-test with remote L2TP-peer (~6-7Mbit/s / RB750GL 6.11) CPU usage increases up to ~76%.
With heavy network load (~20-50 Mbit/s) router reboots sometimes.

Hardware encryption support is broken on RB1100AHx2? Or problems with AES-256 still present? :(
 
Majklik
newbie
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 10:20 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 31, 2014 9:36 am

Does anyone able to use the routing mark + the "Content" field working correctly ?

As soon as I add anything inside the field "Content", the connection will timeout . For example, if I type in "facebook" in the Content field, it supposed to mark the route if I go to http://www.facebook.com . And then eventually route to a VPN connection. However, the connection would time out as soon as I go to http://www.facebook.com.

However, if I take out the "Content" field and make it to mark the route unconditionally, when I go to http://www.facebook.com, it will route to the VPN correctly.

Therefore, it seems adding a condition will break the routing mark.
Going to HTTP facebook will automatically redirect you to HTTPS facebook.

Since its HTTPS, the router cant read the packet content (its encrypted), and therefore will NOT find "facebook" in the content, and not route the connection over the VPN.
The HTTPS connection begins with server certificate transfer to the client. This phase is not encrypted so the router can see what is in the certificate body and there are server names:
        0x0340:  3058 820e 2a2e 7879 2e66 6263 646e 2e6e  0X..*.xy.fbcdn.n
        0x0350:  6574 820e 2a2e 7878 2e66 6263 646e 2e6e  et..*.xx.fbcdn.n
        0x0360:  6574 820b 2a2e 6662 7362 782e 636f 6d82  et..*.fbsbx.com.
        0x0370:  0c66 6163 6562 6f6f 6b2e 636f 6d82 0b2a  .facebook.com..*
        0x0380:  2e66 6263 646e 2e6e 6574 820e 2a2e 6661  .fbcdn.net..*.fa
        0x0390:  6365 626f 6f6b 2e63 6f6d 3009 0603 551d  cebook.com0...U.
So this content firewall rule "facebook" can catch connection to the Facebook.
But if is firewall and routing constructed in the way that new connection to the Facebook is opened directly to the Internet and after few packed is rerouted to the VPN then connection may fail if access to the Internet from VPN uplink use different source IP address.
 
skibi82
newbie
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 7:09 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 31, 2014 10:47 am

Temporary overload stack restarts I submit to Support mikrotik from version 6.9 - for now.

Unfortunately, if someone needs a relatively stable versions 6.x, it remains only to downgrade to 6.7 and wait until support finally solve the problem.

In 1 may 2 years: P

And, as a side or known if at all you will be added to the vpn src addresses.
The ipsec phase 1 is already possible. leaving only ovpn pptp l2tp SSTP

Regards
 
Majklik
newbie
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 10:20 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:50 am

I agree, configurable source address for SSTP and other VPNs will be nice. But I more miss configurable source IP address of the DNS forwarder (especially in conjuction with IPv6).
For some cases (IPv4) this can be substituted by the SRC-NAT or specific route (/ip route add dst-address=<VPN server> gateway=<My gateway> pref-src=<requested source address>).
 
makstex
newbie
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:31 am

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 31, 2014 12:34 pm

PPTP Server radius authorization not working.
radius monitor numbers=0
           pending: 0
          requests: 0
           accepts: 0
           rejects: 0
           resends: 0
          timeouts: 0
       bad-replies: 0
  last-request-rtt: 0ms
v6.10 working fine
 
Clauu
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 205
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:27 pm
Location: RO

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 01, 2014 12:01 am

Suddenly my cpu was up to 100%, latest actions used was 'ip-arp make static' and 'torch'. Also my logging usb flash was reseted do not know if this was before or after that high cpu usage.Profile was showing 'management' as eating the hole cpu, i was not able to generate any supout file due to this high cpu usage.. latest ros 6.11 mipsbe
Having fun with RB850Gx2, RB2011UiAS-2HnD, RB260GSP, RB751U-2HnD, CRS112, RB3011UiAS, hAP ac, cAP ac and hAP ac². More others on the way :-)
 
infused
Member
Member
Posts: 305
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:33 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 01, 2014 9:26 am

What's the latest stable version for CCR? I need to move from 6.3 (pretty stable). It looks like 6.7 is the next stop?
 
User avatar
zervan
Member
Member
Posts: 324
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:43 pm
Location: Slovakia
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 01, 2014 10:54 am

Suddenly my cpu was up to 100%, latest actions used was 'ip-arp make static' and 'torch'. Also my logging usb flash was reseted do not know if this was before or after that high cpu usage.Profile was showing 'management' as eating the hole cpu, i was not able to generate any supout file due to this high cpu usage.. latest ros 6.11 mipsbe
I have a problem with high CPU usage too - but only when I am connected by WinBox. Profiler says non-senses - sometimes flash, sometimes spi process. It is happening on various routers (mipsbe and powerpc) like RB750G, RB493G, RB1200.
Dusan Zervan from Slovakia
MTCNA, MTCRE
 
argeorge
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:14 pm
Location: Greece

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 01, 2014 2:28 pm

There is a bug on traceroute

Std Dev is not correct
After 1+ minute the Std Dev gets very high,probably instead of averaging worst or another time,std dev uses that value.so while it was 0.2ms it went up to 100-90ms

check screenshots
a)Start
b)after 1minute

it seems to be happening on 6.10 also i just checked
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
Clauu
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 205
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:27 pm
Location: RO

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 01, 2014 6:54 pm

Also to high cpu usage.. my isp is giving me 100Mbs(~10MBs) and at 10MBs the rb2011 cpu is on 100%.. then what's the sense of that gigabit ports, if i will want to upgrade my internet connection to 1000Mbs then what i will have to to, change the router too?
LE. Same problem on the smb share,same problem on all situations with moderate traffic(10MBs isn't such a high speed).. at this point this router is kind a useless since my 5years old e2000 with dd-wrt on a broadcom 400mhz is 80% at 10MBs, in this situation i ended up with a downgrade instead of a upgrade
Having fun with RB850Gx2, RB2011UiAS-2HnD, RB260GSP, RB751U-2HnD, CRS112, RB3011UiAS, hAP ac, cAP ac and hAP ac². More others on the way :-)
 
Erastus
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 133
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 4:14 pm
Location: Cape Town

Re: v6.11 released

Wed Apr 02, 2014 5:52 am

We had a crazy fault in our one 386 system. It was working well on ver .11 for the lat 2 weeks. Yesterday it started to rain very hard and quite consistent. All of a sudden all the radios on this system started to "disconnect".
Signal levels are all +/- -57 and did not change.
After I checked what I could I rebooted the system and the all channels are working 100%.
Don't know if this is weather related or something else.
Weill monitor a do another post if it happens again.
Did any one else experienced something similar?
disconnects.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
Jetrider
newbie
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 11:31 am

Re: v6.11 released

Wed Apr 02, 2014 9:43 am

What's the latest stable version for CCR? I need to move from 6.3 (pretty stable). It looks like 6.7 is the next stop?
Depends on what you use it for. For me I have 6.5, because 6.7 still has DHCP server on VLAN issue.
 
fievel
just joined
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2014 9:48 am

Re: v6.11 released

Wed Apr 02, 2014 9:52 am

I have a problem with openvpn server. I tried a bit yesterday and It's the option "Require Client Certificate" which cause the trouble. I see in changelog a lot of improvements in certificate managing. Do I have to regenerate the certificates ? I use self-signed certificate created with openssl on a Linux box.

Edit: Ok see topic : http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 03&start=0
Last edited by fievel on Wed Apr 02, 2014 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
uldis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 3425
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 2:55 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Wed Apr 02, 2014 11:02 am

/interface wireless set 0 frequency=auto channel-width=20/40mhz-ht-below

interface wireless monitor 0                 
                 status: running-ap
                   band: 2ghz-n
              frequency: 2412MHz
      wireless-protocol: 802.11

This puts the ht below and computers have issues connecting.

Can we get channel-width=20/40mhz-ht-auto?
With the new wireless-fp package the the driver will have that feature.
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Wed Apr 02, 2014 4:13 pm

Ticket#2014031766000331
6.10 BUG: user-manager profile limitation can not add profile limitation on command line when default admin customer are renamed, because missing "owner=" parameter.

This bug is still present on last official 6.11.
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 88#p416454

Still exist on 6.12rc1 2014-04-02
I try the other 2 bug I have discovered later
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
nuru
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 11:02 pm
Location: Kaduna, Nigeria

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Apr 03, 2014 2:41 pm

Has anyone tried the CAPsMan over wireless link. The CAP is connecting to the CAPsManager via NV2 radio using layer 3. The CAP get registered to the CAPsManager and 802.11b/g client are registered on the CAPsManager. The forwarding mode is enabled and datapath is a bridge with no physical interface on the bridge port and has a DHCP server. The 802.11b/g client is able to obtain an IP address after associating but cannot ping the IP on the bridge interface (Datapath).
However if the CAP is connected via wire to the CAPsManager it works flawlessly.
 
nuru
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 11:02 pm
Location: Kaduna, Nigeria

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:01 pm

Has anyone tried the CAPsMan over wireless link. The CAP is connecting to the CAPsManager via NV2 radio using layer 3. The CAP get registered to the CAPsManager and 802.11b/g client are registered on the CAPsManager. The forwarding mode is enabled and datapath is a bridge with no physical interface on the bridge port and has a DHCP server. The 802.11b/g client is able to obtain an IP address after associating but cannot ping the IP on the bridge interface (Datapath).
However if the CAP is connected via wire to the CAPsManager it works flawlessly.
Am not sure if the problem was NV2. After changing the wireless protocol to 802.11, it started working
 
Clauu
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 205
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:27 pm
Location: RO

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Apr 04, 2014 9:42 am

I have mailed a ticket to suport but no answer.. after upgrade to latest ros 6.11 my vpn pptp connection keep reseting after couple of hours ~10-20 with the log error 'terminating peer not responding'. The internet connection its a business one from my work so it has nothing to do with it since the whole business is related to its uptime. Also in this time i have left a ping cmd opened between my network - work network and there is no interrupts 0 loss
Having fun with RB850Gx2, RB2011UiAS-2HnD, RB260GSP, RB751U-2HnD, CRS112, RB3011UiAS, hAP ac, cAP ac and hAP ac². More others on the way :-)
 
lelo
just joined
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 3:20 pm
Location: Poland

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Apr 04, 2014 5:48 pm

Hi all..

This is my first post on this forum.

Few days ago I have upgraded all our RB's in company from ROS 5.26 to 6.11.
The configuration we have is quite complex, vpn's (ipsec), ospf...

Today morning I received call from friend from office - nothing is working...

After quick investigation:

DHCP servers bounded to VLAN interfaces on our core RB1100AHx2 router had stopped functioning properly.
The log says:
server4 offering lease x.x.x.x for AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:FF without success
Thank's god.. I have unused RB450G with old ROS 5.26, on which I have set up DHCP for all VLAN's over single cable.

I very, very disappointed.
Why are guys releasing "stable" versions of ROS with such a BUGS ??
 
lelo
just joined
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 3:20 pm
Location: Poland

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Apr 04, 2014 5:49 pm

Hi all..

This is my first post on this forum.

Few days ago I have upgraded all our RB's in company from ROS 5.26 to 6.11.
The configuration we have is quite complex, vpn's (ipsec), ospf...

Today morning I received call from friend from office - nothing is working...

After quick investigation:

DHCP servers bounded to VLAN interfaces on our core RB1100AHx2 router had stopped functioning properly.
The log says:
server4 offering lease x.x.x.x for AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:FF without success
Thank's god.. I have unused RB450G with old ROS 5.26, on which I have set up DHCP for all VLAN's over single cable.

I am very, very disappointed.
Why are guys releasing "stable" versions of ROS with such a BUGS ??
 
grzes
just joined
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:17 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Apr 05, 2014 2:25 am

I have another problem. IP->ARP. On list when trying to 'make static' all defined bridges are removed :?
I tried twice and twice removed bridges.
 
User avatar
docmarius
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1219
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: Timisoara, Romania
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Apr 05, 2014 9:54 am

Just upgraded a brand new RB1100AHx2 to 6.11.
Under Resources, it shows Sector writes since reboot 0, Total sector writes 0, although I did save the configuration at least 3 times and have a dyndns script which writes a file on IP change.
Can anyone else confirm this?
Torturing CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+, RB450G, RB750GL, RB951G-2HnD, RB960PGS, RB260GSP, OmniTIK 5HnD and NetMetal 922UAGS-5HPacD + R11e-5HnD in my home network.
 
abeggled
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 4:00 pm
Location: Zollikofen, Switzerland

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Apr 05, 2014 9:59 am

Yes, but not for RB1100AHx2, for RB1100AH.
 
User avatar
chimaster
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:54 am
Location: Queenstown
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Apr 07, 2014 5:24 am

Over the weekend we upgraded our CCR1016-12G to 6.11, including Firmware to 3.12.

It runs approximately 80 L2TP DSL connections and some BGP/OSPF. After upgrade we've had our primary router fail twice, requiring power resets on both occasions. As it's off site in a Co-Lo it's hard to physically view it going down. Our secondary is also running 6.11 3.12 and operates as backup, it's been up for 2Days 18 Hours (since upgrade) even with load from DSL failing over to it for approx 10 Hours. We don't see any strange CPU spikes or anything, just stops.!

We're trying to run everything on secondary router to see if it stops after 10 hours of 80+ connections. Anyone else had stability issues with CCR on 6.11? Keen to hear.

Cheers
MTCNA - MTCWE - MTCRE - MTCINE - All round good guy and Linux nut
<plug>
HQWiFi making http://www.queenstown.com Wireless since 2001.
</plug>
 
lelo
just joined
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 3:20 pm
Location: Poland

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Apr 07, 2014 8:41 pm

docmarius, I confirm.
On my RB1100AHx2 after upgrade to 6.11:

Both Sector Writes Since Reboot and Total Sector Writes: 0
 
User avatar
chimaster
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:54 am
Location: Queenstown
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Apr 07, 2014 10:07 pm

Came in this morning, both primary and backup routers down. As secondary is in my office I Mac Winboxed in to receive these lovely messages.

apr/08 06:46:01 route,bgp,info RemoteAddress=10.1.1.1
apr/08 06:46:07 route,bgp,info Failed to open TCP connection: No buffer space available
apr/08 06:46:07 route,bgp,info RemoteAddress=112.68.40.192
apr/08 06:46:21 route,bgp,info Failed to open TCP connection: No buffer space available
apr/08 06:46:21 route,bgp,info RemoteAddress=112.68.40.192
apr/08 06:46:59 route,bgp,info Failed to open TCP connection: No buffer space available
apr/08 06:46:59 route,bgp,info RemoteAddress=112.68.40.192
apr/08 06:47:02 route,bgp,info Failed to open TCP connection: No buffer space available
apr/08 06:47:02 route,bgp,info RemoteAddress=10.1.1.1
apr/08 06:47:13 route,bgp,info Failed to open TCP connection: No buffer space available
apr/08 06:47:13 route,bgp,info RemoteAddress=112.68.40.192
apr/08 06:47:55 route,bgp,info Failed to open TCP connection: No buffer space available
apr/08 06:47:55 route,bgp,info RemoteAddress=112.68.40.192
apr/08 06:48:00 route,bgp,info Failed to open TCP connection: No buffer space available
apr/08 06:48:00 route,bgp,info RemoteAddress=10.1.1.1

We've made no changes since 6.6 which we were on aside from ROS and Firmware update. Otherwise exact same routers. I'm either going to roll back to 6.6 or take on board any other suggestions??? Generating support file and ticket also. Just thought I'd update everyone in case similar issues are being experienced.
MTCNA - MTCWE - MTCRE - MTCINE - All round good guy and Linux nut
<plug>
HQWiFi making http://www.queenstown.com Wireless since 2001.
</plug>
 
User avatar
docmarius
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1219
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: Timisoara, Romania
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:22 pm

I have seen another problem with 6.11, on the CRS-125:
After upgrading from 6.10, after about 2 days of functioning well, the device hangs completely, as if the switch would go amok.
No access to it, just a reset bringing it out of it (it can be reset from the LCD panel). There is no spout.
This happened to me twice, at almost perfect 45 hours interval.
Downgrade to 6.10 keeps it stable.
I will try to upgrade again to confirm the behavior.
Torturing CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+, RB450G, RB750GL, RB951G-2HnD, RB960PGS, RB260GSP, OmniTIK 5HnD and NetMetal 922UAGS-5HPacD + R11e-5HnD in my home network.
 
User avatar
chimaster
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:54 am
Location: Queenstown
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:33 am

Reporting Same issue, not 4 hours since moving back to primary router. Will be downgrading to 6.10 until resolved. Lots of flapping, 30 attempts to winbox in, slow, logs are not relevant to issue. Issuing reboot command can't afford to muck around as no physical access to router. However as router hasn't died but is in deaththrows failover is not active for our Layer 2.
MTCNA - MTCWE - MTCRE - MTCINE - All round good guy and Linux nut
<plug>
HQWiFi making http://www.queenstown.com Wireless since 2001.
</plug>
 
WirelessRudy
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 3089
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:54 pm
Location: Spain

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:35 am

After reading this lengthily tread several times I'll guess we can consider 6.10 to be the last stable version for now.... :?

Glad I didn't use the auto upgrade function. My whole network (with almost every type of rb's, vlan's, dhcp servers (over vlan), bridged and static routes) runs .10 now, some since it came out. No issues so far.
I have one cpe running 6.11. I'll guess that's as far as I'll have it penetrate my network...

See what .12 might bring us....


For the impatience among us, don't bother if MT is not answering your support request or any answers on this tread. The amount of reported bugs/problems is at such a scale they are obviously working hard to find out what went where and why and how wrong to correct them asap in a new release... be patient and keep the good spirit! :D
Show your appreciation of this post by giving me Karma! Thanks.

Rudy R. Puister

WISP operator based on MT routerboard & ROS.
 
nuru
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 11:02 pm
Location: Kaduna, Nigeria

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 08, 2014 2:05 am

Has anyone tried the CAPsMan over wireless link. The CAP is connecting to the CAPsManager via NV2 radio using layer 3. The CAP get registered to the CAPsManager and 802.11b/g client are registered on the CAPsManager. The forwarding mode is enabled and datapath is a bridge with no physical interface on the bridge port and has a DHCP server. The 802.11b/g client is able to obtain an IP address after associating but cannot ping the IP on the bridge interface (Datapath).
However if the CAP is connected via wire to the CAPsManager it works flawlessly.
Am not sure if the problem was NV2. After changing the wireless protocol to 802.11, it started working
Its not NV2 because it stopped pinging after rebooting. I think the CAPsMan does not work over wireless link.
 
samsung172
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1186
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 3:45 am
Location: Østfold - Norway
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 08, 2014 2:24 am

Failed to open TCP connection: No buffer space available <- A bug. also to be seen in pppoe. Is there a somehow memory leak or something "buffer leak" in 6.11?
 
AlexS
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 259
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 7:21 am

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 08, 2014 8:56 am

What's the latest stable version for CCR? I need to move from 6.3 (pretty stable). It looks like 6.7 is the next stop?

I am running 6.10 on CCR1036-8G-2S+

I had to move to 6.10 to lacp working.
Apart from not being able to push > 1Gb/s tcp sessions through the box, everything else seems to be working fine.

But it sounds like 6.11 might not be ready for me
 
User avatar
chimaster
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:54 am
Location: Queenstown
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:37 am

Confirm. Downgraded to 6.10. Stable again. Just downgrading secondary router tonight when everyone else is sleeping...
MTCNA - MTCWE - MTCRE - MTCINE - All round good guy and Linux nut
<plug>
HQWiFi making http://www.queenstown.com Wireless since 2001.
</plug>
 
farshidar
just joined
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 5:05 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:48 pm

Hi!
I have a problems after upgrade on v6.11 on my RB751U-2HnD (firmware: v3.13):

Device just freeze every 3-4 hours - it`s very bad for my work. I do power of and on. Later i set IP adress in "watchdog" tab, and device reboot automaticaly and works fine 3-4 hours and history repeat.
I aways updgrade new version in this device when new release at soon, and i never not have problem. Whats wrong?

...But another my device RB751U-2HnD, and more different models works fine, but hes is works with a most simple configuration

Of cause? I don`t imagine my work without MikroTik! Perfectly product line!

Sorry for my Eng.. :o

Thanks!

I have a same problem-Downgrade to 6.10
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 08, 2014 2:13 pm

Ticket#2014031766000331
6.10 BUG: user-manager profile limitation can not add profile limitation on command line when default admin customer are renamed, because missing "owner=" parameter.

This bug is still present on last official 6.11.
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 88#p416454

Still exist on 6.12rc1 2014-04-02
I try the other 2 bug I have discovered later
Still exist on 6.12rc1 (2014-Apr-07 09:04):
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 08, 2014 2:17 pm

Image

6.12rc1 (2014-Apr-07 09:04):

Winbox field alignment on Firewall section FIXED.
Last edited by rextended on Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
User avatar
chimaster
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:54 am
Location: Queenstown
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Wed Apr 09, 2014 1:19 am

6.10 crashed again this morning, rolling right back to 6.6. Can't afford more of these outages.
MTCNA - MTCWE - MTCRE - MTCINE - All round good guy and Linux nut
<plug>
HQWiFi making http://www.queenstown.com Wireless since 2001.
</plug>
 
User avatar
SiB
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 182
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: Poland

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:01 am

CCR1016-12G v6.11 and after 11h (max 70h) I have DENY/BLOCK any communication via IPv4 to/from MT.
Connection to MT are work only via RS232.

One core have 100%:
6 cpu6 100% 1% 0%

Output by L3:
/ping 217.67.x.y    
HOST                                     SIZE TTL TIME  STATUS                 
                                                        105 (No buffer space...
                                                        105 (No buffer space...
                                                        105 (No buffer space...
                                                        105 (No buffer space...
    sent=4 received=0 packet-loss=100%
/ping arp-ping=yes address=217.67.x.y interface=ether1
HOST                                     SIZE TTL TIME  STATUS                 
00:0C:CF:FC:58:1A                                 0ms  
00:0C:CF:FC:58:1A                                 0ms  
    sent=7 received=7 packet-loss=0% min-rtt=0ms avg-rtt=0ms max-rtt=0ms
But MicroTik Discovery Protocol not work from outsite, test on 3 interfaces.

Case is report to Microtik support, I plan downgrade to 6.4 (last working version with hung/watchdog reboot about 2-3mts).

BTW. LCD is freeze when I go to 'Interfaces > ether1 > Stats > Bandwidth', screen: prntscr.com/38m4n5
Log in reboot process: 'failed to stop lcdstat: std failure: timeout (13)'
 
User avatar
chimaster
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:54 am
Location: Queenstown
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Apr 10, 2014 11:15 am

Sounds like same issue as me. Did you have any BGP running?
MTCNA - MTCWE - MTCRE - MTCINE - All round good guy and Linux nut
<plug>
HQWiFi making http://www.queenstown.com Wireless since 2001.
</plug>
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5942
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Apr 10, 2014 2:02 pm

no buffer space is related to L2TP. If you have L2TP configured then this problem will be fixed in v6.12.
 
Elissen
just joined
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:27 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Apr 10, 2014 5:01 pm

no buffer space is related to L2TP. If you have L2TP configured then this problem will be fixed in v6.12.
I've been sending supout files in relation to no buffer space errors. Unfortunatly I did not get a response to my e-mails. Could you please look at 2013050666000323 if my issues is the same issue?
And yes, we use l2tp a lot.
 
nosovk
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:25 am
Location: Ukraine
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Apr 11, 2014 12:28 am

vlans is down.
All is ok on RoS 6,9.
6,10-6,11 doesnt work. You cant get adress from dhcp server via vlan.
Аренда Програмного обеспечения
https://www.CloudZZ.com
Микротики на Украине оптом
mikrotik.kharkov.ua
 
User avatar
Alfabi
newbie
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 9:52 am
Location: Ukraine
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:29 am

im have troubles with bridges - bridge become unknown, reboot fix problem....

where download link 6.12 is already fixed????
http://www.bios-computer.com - Fastest WISP in UA
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24276
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:58 am

docmarius, I confirm.
On my RB1100AHx2 after upgrade to 6.11:

Both Sector Writes Since Reboot and Total Sector Writes: 0
This was never supported on RB1100 due to specific file system on RB1100. It was not showing on previous versions too
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
User avatar
SiB
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 182
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: Poland

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:46 pm

no buffer space is related to L2TP. If you have L2TP configured then this problem will be fixed in v6.12.
Thanks, I have sure now about that release have got fix on this problem. I plan upgrade to this v6.12rc1 asap.
I'm not use BGP.
 
willbur
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 58
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 8:58 am

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Apr 11, 2014 4:52 pm

im have troubles with bridges - bridge become unknown, reboot fix problem....

where download link 6.12 is already fixed????
Same. So disgusted with MK right now! It's not like we can easily drive to our customer sites.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24276
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Apr 11, 2014 5:03 pm

im have troubles with bridges - bridge become unknown, reboot fix problem....

where download link 6.12 is already fixed????
Same. So disgusted with MK right now! It's not like we can easily drive to our customer sites.
try this pre-release issue (not final, some issues with tunnels not completely fixed):

CCR http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... e-6.12.npk
PPC: http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... c-6.12.npk
MIPS BE: http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... e-6.12.npk
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
willbur
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 58
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 8:58 am

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Apr 11, 2014 6:18 pm

im have troubles with bridges - bridge become unknown, reboot fix problem....

where download link 6.12 is already fixed????
Same. So disgusted with MK right now! It's not like we can easily drive to our customer sites.
try this pre-release issue (not final, some issues with tunnels not completely fixed):

CCR http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... e-6.12.npk
PPC: http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... c-6.12.npk
MIPS BE: http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... e-6.12.npk
What are the risks of downgrading while not having someone out onsite? I hate to say it Normunds, but were at the point of not knowing which versions are truly the stable ones... We've got about 20% of routers coming back because of this exact issue with 6.11. I think Mikrotik is taking on too much between CAPSman, wireless, new products, etc. I think its time to slow down and start focusing on what needs to be fixed rather than launching a continual of products with bugs.
 
willbur
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 58
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 8:58 am

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Apr 11, 2014 8:13 pm

After reading this lengthily tread several times I'll guess we can consider 6.10 to be the last stable version for now.... :?

Glad I didn't use the auto upgrade function. My whole network (with almost every type of rb's, vlan's, dhcp servers (over vlan), bridged and static routes) runs .10 now, some since it came out. No issues so far.
I have one cpe running 6.11. I'll guess that's as far as I'll have it penetrate my network...

See what .12 might bring us....


For the impatience among us, don't bother if MT is not answering your support request or any answers on this tread. The amount of reported bugs/problems is at such a scale they are obviously working hard to find out what went where and why and how wrong to correct them asap in a new release... be patient and keep the good spirit! :D
The entirety of V6 seems to be botched with no end in sight.
 
User avatar
payday
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 233
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 11:05 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Apr 11, 2014 8:42 pm

The entirety of V6 seems to be botched with no end in sight.
In V5 everything was fixed in 5.26, so in V6 we are not even in half way.... ;) ;)
 
wrobli
just joined
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:39 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Apr 11, 2014 8:51 pm

+ 1
 
madpixel
just joined
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2014 10:55 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Apr 12, 2014 12:47 pm

http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... =1#p416465
is still not fixed in latest 6.12 pre-release :(
This bug is present only on CCR(i see it on CCR1016 router), on RB2011 all netflow data is OK
 
zero13th
just joined
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri May 20, 2011 12:11 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:04 pm

@Normis,
Does RouterOS affected by Heartbleed bug?

6.11? 5.26? 4.17?
 
User avatar
docmarius
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1219
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: Timisoara, Romania
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Apr 12, 2014 7:02 pm

A search reveals:

Heartbleed vulnerability OpenSSL [RouterOS IS NOT affected]
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=83815
Torturing CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+, RB450G, RB750GL, RB951G-2HnD, RB960PGS, RB260GSP, OmniTIK 5HnD and NetMetal 922UAGS-5HPacD + R11e-5HnD in my home network.
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 10:47 am

Ticket#2014031766000331
6.10 BUG: user-manager profile limitation can not add profile limitation on command line when default admin customer are renamed, because missing "owner=" parameter.

This bug is still present on last official 6.11.
Still exist on 6.12rc1 2014-04-02
I try the other 2 bug I have discovered later
Still exist on 6.12rc1 (2014-Apr-07 09:04):
STILL EXIST ON 6.12 (2014-Apr-14)
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 88#p416454

BUG SIGNALED FROM 6.10 AND STILL NOT FIXED??? :evil:

Opened another ticket for that: [Ticket#2014041566000226] 6.12 UNFIXED BUG: user-manager profile limitation


:( OK, I UNDERSTAND,
is more important to fix CRS than this "limited" option....

I wait the fix on 6.13.... :?
Last edited by rextended on Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
User avatar
doneware
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 539
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:39 pm
Location: Hungary

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 2:33 pm

no buffer space is related to L2TP. If you have L2TP configured then this problem will be fixed in v6.12.
sure?
i have more boxes with GRE tunnels + IPSec ESP transport mode to encrypt tunnels. There is no L2TP whatsoever in them.
they still consume more and more "route cache entries" and end up throwing the "No buffer space available" errmsg.

Apr/03/2014 11:30:19 route,bgp,info Failed to open TCP connection: No buffer space available
Apr/03/2014 11:30:19 route,bgp,info RemoteAddress=10.x.x.x

there are like 80 or so individual GRE tunnels in the box (act as hub device) and each tunnel has IPSec ESP transport.
i also use tunnel keepalives (10 sec interval). there is BGP running in the tunnels to steer traffic into the encrypted path.
the traffic is fairly low, so the RB2011 handles it pretty well...

i upgraded to 6.12 (pre-release, the one from 11.07) and the issue still persists.
#TR0359
 
huntah
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 3:24 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 10:55 pm

[Ticket#2014032566001217]
BUG 6.12: Replicable kernel crash when try to discover why winbox not working well from 6.8 over IP obtained from pppoe-client

Hi,

when I try to replicate this problem:
"Winbox connection freeze after some kb received over mppe encrypted connection"
RouterOS version affected: all from 6.8, 6.9, 6.10, 6.11, 6.12 (2014/03/24)
From 6.10 the problem go worst.
I get continuosly kernel failure and routerboard reboot with this configuration:

For this example I use one RB1100AHx2 and one RB951G-2HnD,
netinstalled with ***NO*** Keep old configuration and routeros-powerpc-6.12.npk / routeros-mipsbe-6.12.npk
both have last 3.10 / 3.12 bios.

The connection maded with ethernet cable are:

PC -> PoE - > ether13 RB1100AHx2
RB1100AHx2 ether2 -> RB951G-2HnD ether2
power jack -> RB951G-2HnD

The PoE and the ethernet cable do not matter, also tried to change.

RB1100AHx2 and RB951G-2HnD:
after netinstall
disable all packages except for:
routeros-powerpc / routeros-mipsbe
ppp
system
and reboot

paste this on RB1100AHx2 terminal

ros code

/interface eoip
add keepalive=10 local-address=192.168.3.1 mac-address=02:AE:6D:55:61:E2 name=eoip-tunnel1 remote-address=192.168.3.2 tunnel-id=666
/interface bridge settings
set use-ip-firewall=yes
/interface pppoe-server server
add authentication=mschap2 default-profile=default-encryption disabled=no interface=eoip-tunnel1 mrru=1614 service-name=service1
/ip address
add address=192.168.2.1/24 interface=ether13 network=192.168.2.0
add address=192.168.3.1/24 interface=ether2 network=192.168.3.0
/ip firewall connection tracking
set enabled=yes
/ppp secret
add local-address=10.0.0.1 name=test password=test profile=default-encryption remote-address=10.0.0.2
/system identity
set name="Test Gateway"
paste this on RB951G-2HnD terminal

ros code

/interface eoip
add keepalive=10 local-address=192.168.3.2 mac-address=02:08:2C:28:55:D6 name=eoip-tunnel1 remote-address=192.168.3.1 tunnel-id=666
/interface pppoe-client
add ac-name="" add-default-route=yes allow=mschap2 default-route-distance=1 dial-on-demand=no disabled=no interface=eoip-tunnel1 keepalive-timeout=60 max-mru=1480 max-mtu=1480 mrru=1614 name=pppoe-out1 password=test profile=default-encryption \
    service-name="" use-peer-dns=yes user=test
/interface bridge settings
set use-ip-firewall=yes
/ip address
add address=192.168.3.2/24 interface=ether2 network=192.168.3.0
/ip firewall connection tracking
set enabled=yes
/system identity
set name="Test CPE"
When you open with winbox 10.0.0.2 [after 1 hour, or 1 minutes are equal]
the RB1100AHx2 continuosly reboot / freeze without creating any autosupout.rif,
but with kernel failure on log and on terminal on serial port:
[admin@Test Gateway] /file> Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#1]
SMP NR_CPUS=2 RB1120
NIP: 8021a730 LR: 8021a46c CTR: 00000000
REGS: dffefd30 TRAP: 0700   Not tainted  (3.3.5-smp)
MSR: 00029000 <CE,EE,ME>  CR: 42000028  XER: 20000000
TASK = 8036d3c0[0] 'swapper/0' THREAD: 80380000 CPU: 0
GPR00: 8021a46c dffefde0 8036d3c0 fffffff2 de6f58aa 00000001 de6f4e50 dc870cd2
GPR08: 120ff29a 0000001d 00000000 8021a400 42000022 00000001 dd9fc300 00000012
GPR16: 00000003 00000000 e1811a40 000005e2 de6dd414 e1811a2c e18119c8 e18119ec
GPR24: 00000012 e1811828 de6dd484 0000003b 000000fd dd9fc300 dd9fc300 de6dd3c0
NIP [8021a730] __pskb_pull_tail+0x330/0x340
LR [8021a46c] __pskb_pull_tail+0x6c/0x340
Call Trace:
[dffefde0] [8021a46c] __pskb_pull_tail+0x6c/0x340 (unreliable)
[dffefe00] [e180df30] ppp_register_channel+0xb20/0x1b4c [ppp_generic@0xe180c000]
[dffefe30] [e180f8d4] ppp_output_wakeup+0x978/0xa20 [ppp_generic@0xe180c000]
[dffefe90] [e180fb30] ppp_input+0xf0/0x12a4 [ppp_generic@0xe180c000]
[dffefeb0] [e18494d0] 0xe18494d0 [pppoe@0xe1849000]
[dffefed0] [80221f9c] __netif_receive_skb+0x220/0x400
[dffeff30] [802224a0] process_backlog+0xac/0x178
[dffeff60] [80223870] net_rx_action+0xc0/0x170
[dffeffa0] [80031a14] __do_softirq+0xf4/0x178
[dffefff0] [8000c054] call_do_softirq+0x14/0x24
[80381e80] [80003f5c] do_softirq+0x98/0xc4
[80381ea0] [80031d84] irq_exit+0xa0/0xd4
[80381eb0] [80003c44] do_IRQ+0x94/0x190
[80381ee0] [8000d71c] ret_from_except+0x0/0x18
--- Exception: 501 at cpu_idle+0x8c/0xe0
    LR = cpu_idle+0x8c/0xe0
[80381fc0] [8034076c] start_kernel+0x2d4/0x2e8
[80381ff0] [800003f8] skpinv+0x2e4/0x320
Instruction dump:
7fdcf378 3b400000 4bffffa0 7fc3f378 7c84f850 4bfffced 2f830000 409eff9c
7f43d378 4bffe9c9 38600000 4bffff00 <0fe00000> 38c00001 7cc903a6 4bfffd90
---[ end trace 72421d3cf3d534d4 ]---

Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt

panicSaver: dumping panic to flash
flash: erase 10
flash: prg 10
flash: prg err 0
Rebooting in 1 seconds..
------------[ cut here ]------------
Kernel BUG at 800a3a70 [verbose debug info unavailable]
Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#2]
SMP NR_CPUS=2 RB1120
NIP: 800a3a70 LR: 800113ec CTR: 00000000
REGS: dffefa60 TRAP: 0700   Tainted: G      D       (3.3.5-smp)
MSR: 00021000 <CE,ME>  CR: 22000024  XER: 20000000
TASK = 8036d3c0[0] 'swapper/0' THREAD: 80380000 CPU: 0
GPR00: 800113ec dffefb10 8036d3c0 00001000 00000001 00000001 e1000000 edffc000
GPR08: 000000d0 80017554 00000300 fffffffd 22000024 00000001 dd9fc300 00000012
GPR16: 00000003 00000000 e1811a40 000005e2 de6dd414 e1811a2c e18119c8 e18119ec
GPR24: 80017554 80380000 e1000000 edffc000 000000d0 00000001 00000001 80017554
NIP [800a3a70] __get_vm_area_node.isra.31+0x34/0x180
LR [800113ec] __ioremap_caller+0x170/0x1a4
Call Trace:
[dffefb10] [e137c43c] flash_fixed_cmd+0x140/0x204 [flash@0xe137b000] (unreliable
)
[dffefb40] [800113ec] __ioremap_caller+0x170/0x1a4
[dffefb70] [80017554] rb1120_restart+0x68/0xa4
[dffefb90] [8000b35c] machine_restart+0x48/0x60
[dffefbb0] [802ad3b0] panic+0x198/0x1e8
[dffefc00] [800096b4] die+0x244/0x284
[dffefc30] [8000984c] _exception+0x100/0x114
[dffefd20] [8000d6d0] ret_from_except_full+0x0/0x4c
--- Exception: 700 at __pskb_pull_tail+0x330/0x340
    LR = __pskb_pull_tail+0x6c/0x340
[dffefe00] [e180df30] ppp_register_channel+0xb20/0x1b4c [ppp_generic@0xe180c000]
[dffefe30] [e180f8d4] ppp_output_wakeup+0x978/0xa20 [ppp_generic@0xe180c000]
[dffefe90] [e180fb30] ppp_input+0xf0/0x12a4 [ppp_generic@0xe180c000]
[dffefeb0] [e18494d0] 0xe18494d0 [pppoe@0xe1849000]
[dffefed0] [80221f9c] __netif_receive_skb+0x220/0x400
[dffeff30] [802224a0] process_backlog+0xac/0x178
[dffeff60] [80223870] net_rx_action+0xc0/0x170
[dffeffa0] [80031a14] __do_softirq+0xf4/0x178
[dffefff0] [8000c054] call_do_softirq+0x14/0x24
[80381e80] [80003f5c] do_softirq+0x98/0xc4
[80381ea0] [80031d84] irq_exit+0xa0/0xd4
[80381eb0] [80003c44] do_IRQ+0x94/0x190
[80381ee0] [8000d71c] ret_from_except+0x0/0x18
--- Exception: 501 at cpu_idle+0x8c/0xe0
    LR = cpu_idle+0x8c/0xe0
[80381fc0] [8034076c] start_kernel+0x2d4/0x2e8
[80381ff0] [800003f8] skpinv+0x2e4/0x320
Instruction dump:
9421ffd0 bf010010 542a0024 90010034 7c9d2378 7cbe2b78 7cda3378 814a000c
7cfb3b78 7d1c4378 7d384b78 554a016e <0f0a0000> 70a90001 41820018 7c690034
---[ end trace 72421d3cf3d534d5 ]---
I hope that I've explained everything well and sufficently detailed all.

Thanks to all.

Do you power RB1100 over POE ?

I had a similiar problem when my main RB2011 (powered over classing DC adapter) got POE on ether2. One of my collegues attached test SXT wrong (POE went to RB2011 and LAN to SXT :). In this setup my RB2011 rebooted sporadicly (15 min, then 1h, then 3 min then again 4h etc..). I tried to change ROS from 6.5 to 6.11.
Everytime it was kernel panic, and reboot. However router made autosupp.out which I sent to support@mikrotik. By the time they answered me I found the POE culprit (he called me saying my SXT is not working.. :)) After correctly attached SXT no more reboots..

I answered the support team of my solution but you can try if it is the same problem..
 
remojames
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:19 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:25 pm

I have CCR1036-12G-4S after upgrade to 6.12 when I do /export file=backup kernel panic and reboot :)
other thing's Look's fine at the moment
I have question should I make upgrade firmware to 3.13? now i have 3.10.

thanks
remo
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:40 pm

Do you power RB1100 over POE ?

I had a similiar problem when my main RB2011 (powered over classing DC adapter) got POE on ether2. One of my collegues attached test SXT wrong (POE went to RB2011 and LAN to SXT :). In this setup my RB2011 rebooted sporadicly (15 min, then 1h, then 3 min then again 4h etc..). I tried to change ROS from 6.5 to 6.11.
Everytime it was kernel panic, and reboot. However router made autosupp.out which I sent to support@mikrotik. By the time they answered me I found the POE culprit (he called me saying my SXT is not working.. :)) After correctly attached SXT no more reboots..

I answered the support team of my solution but you can try if it is the same problem..
I have all my machine on CED powered @ 24V* by PoE on ether13, 2 RB1100AH and 4 RB1100AHx2, no one single reboot, kernel panic / or kernel failure before 6.8.
(Really are scheduled each 28 days @ 04:00AM all the system reboots, and for all I intend all the devices/cpe on my network...)

Really when I made test procedure, hardware no matter, if powered by poe or by jack / 230V power plug.

*Exactly 24V from voltage regulator attached on 13,8V + 13,8V 110AH batteries

For the support I write the procedure with specific hardware, but I can use one RB600A for server and one RB133C3 for client, both powered by jack, and the bug is the same....
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24276
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.11 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 10:36 am

No answer to your question? How to write posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests