Community discussions

 
BeepDog
just joined
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:41 am

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 31, 2014 7:23 am

Posting here, so that others can know about it.

I just read through the entire thread, and I'm not certain if others are having the same problem I am. I have an RB800, and it's started crashing and rebooting for me at random times. Once while I was in the webUI, wondering why the CPU graph was spiking. The WebUI crawled to a halt, and I heard the watchdog beep as it rebooted the thing.
Caught a log output screenshot when it bombed. And yes, I sent the autosupout.rif as well as a supout.rif to mikrotik. I haven't heard anything back, yet, and I'm not sure I will.
MikroTikFailureLog-cropped.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
sdv
just joined
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2013 9:30 am

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 31, 2014 9:14 am

ROS: 6.11
Board: RB1100AHx2
Role: IPSec AES-256 / L2TP-Server / OSPF
Tested bugs:
Performance degradation & spontaneously reboots.
Without any network load (ipsec only) /system resource print shows ~ 14-18% CPU usage.
While bandwidth-test with remote L2TP-peer (~6-7Mbit/s / RB750GL 6.11) CPU usage increases up to ~76%.
With heavy network load (~20-50 Mbit/s) router reboots sometimes.

Hardware encryption support is broken on RB1100AHx2? Or problems with AES-256 still present? :(
 
Majklik
newbie
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 10:20 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 31, 2014 9:36 am

Does anyone able to use the routing mark + the "Content" field working correctly ?

As soon as I add anything inside the field "Content", the connection will timeout . For example, if I type in "facebook" in the Content field, it supposed to mark the route if I go to http://www.facebook.com . And then eventually route to a VPN connection. However, the connection would time out as soon as I go to http://www.facebook.com.

However, if I take out the "Content" field and make it to mark the route unconditionally, when I go to http://www.facebook.com, it will route to the VPN correctly.

Therefore, it seems adding a condition will break the routing mark.
Going to HTTP facebook will automatically redirect you to HTTPS facebook.

Since its HTTPS, the router cant read the packet content (its encrypted), and therefore will NOT find "facebook" in the content, and not route the connection over the VPN.
The HTTPS connection begins with server certificate transfer to the client. This phase is not encrypted so the router can see what is in the certificate body and there are server names:
        0x0340:  3058 820e 2a2e 7879 2e66 6263 646e 2e6e  0X..*.xy.fbcdn.n
        0x0350:  6574 820e 2a2e 7878 2e66 6263 646e 2e6e  et..*.xx.fbcdn.n
        0x0360:  6574 820b 2a2e 6662 7362 782e 636f 6d82  et..*.fbsbx.com.
        0x0370:  0c66 6163 6562 6f6f 6b2e 636f 6d82 0b2a  .facebook.com..*
        0x0380:  2e66 6263 646e 2e6e 6574 820e 2a2e 6661  .fbcdn.net..*.fa
        0x0390:  6365 626f 6f6b 2e63 6f6d 3009 0603 551d  cebook.com0...U.
So this content firewall rule "facebook" can catch connection to the Facebook.
But if is firewall and routing constructed in the way that new connection to the Facebook is opened directly to the Internet and after few packed is rerouted to the VPN then connection may fail if access to the Internet from VPN uplink use different source IP address.
 
skibi82
newbie
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 7:09 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 31, 2014 10:47 am

Temporary overload stack restarts I submit to Support mikrotik from version 6.9 - for now.

Unfortunately, if someone needs a relatively stable versions 6.x, it remains only to downgrade to 6.7 and wait until support finally solve the problem.

In 1 may 2 years: P

And, as a side or known if at all you will be added to the vpn src addresses.
The ipsec phase 1 is already possible. leaving only ovpn pptp l2tp SSTP

Regards
 
Majklik
newbie
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 10:20 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:50 am

I agree, configurable source address for SSTP and other VPNs will be nice. But I more miss configurable source IP address of the DNS forwarder (especially in conjuction with IPv6).
For some cases (IPv4) this can be substituted by the SRC-NAT or specific route (/ip route add dst-address=<VPN server> gateway=<My gateway> pref-src=<requested source address>).
 
makstex
newbie
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:31 am

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Mar 31, 2014 12:34 pm

PPTP Server radius authorization not working.
radius monitor numbers=0
           pending: 0
          requests: 0
           accepts: 0
           rejects: 0
           resends: 0
          timeouts: 0
       bad-replies: 0
  last-request-rtt: 0ms
v6.10 working fine
 
Clauu
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 205
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:27 pm
Location: RO

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 01, 2014 12:01 am

Suddenly my cpu was up to 100%, latest actions used was 'ip-arp make static' and 'torch'. Also my logging usb flash was reseted do not know if this was before or after that high cpu usage.Profile was showing 'management' as eating the hole cpu, i was not able to generate any supout file due to this high cpu usage.. latest ros 6.11 mipsbe
Having fun with RB850Gx2, RB2011UiAS-2HnD, RB260GSP, RB751U-2HnD, CRS112, RB3011UiAS, hAP ac, cAP ac and hAP ac². More others on the way :-)
 
infused
Member
Member
Posts: 305
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:33 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 01, 2014 9:26 am

What's the latest stable version for CCR? I need to move from 6.3 (pretty stable). It looks like 6.7 is the next stop?
 
User avatar
zervan
Member
Member
Posts: 324
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:43 pm
Location: Slovakia
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 01, 2014 10:54 am

Suddenly my cpu was up to 100%, latest actions used was 'ip-arp make static' and 'torch'. Also my logging usb flash was reseted do not know if this was before or after that high cpu usage.Profile was showing 'management' as eating the hole cpu, i was not able to generate any supout file due to this high cpu usage.. latest ros 6.11 mipsbe
I have a problem with high CPU usage too - but only when I am connected by WinBox. Profiler says non-senses - sometimes flash, sometimes spi process. It is happening on various routers (mipsbe and powerpc) like RB750G, RB493G, RB1200.
Dusan Zervan from Slovakia
MTCNA, MTCRE
 
argeorge
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:14 pm
Location: Greece

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 01, 2014 2:28 pm

There is a bug on traceroute

Std Dev is not correct
After 1+ minute the Std Dev gets very high,probably instead of averaging worst or another time,std dev uses that value.so while it was 0.2ms it went up to 100-90ms

check screenshots
a)Start
b)after 1minute

it seems to be happening on 6.10 also i just checked
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
Clauu
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 205
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:27 pm
Location: RO

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 01, 2014 6:54 pm

Also to high cpu usage.. my isp is giving me 100Mbs(~10MBs) and at 10MBs the rb2011 cpu is on 100%.. then what's the sense of that gigabit ports, if i will want to upgrade my internet connection to 1000Mbs then what i will have to to, change the router too?
LE. Same problem on the smb share,same problem on all situations with moderate traffic(10MBs isn't such a high speed).. at this point this router is kind a useless since my 5years old e2000 with dd-wrt on a broadcom 400mhz is 80% at 10MBs, in this situation i ended up with a downgrade instead of a upgrade
Having fun with RB850Gx2, RB2011UiAS-2HnD, RB260GSP, RB751U-2HnD, CRS112, RB3011UiAS, hAP ac, cAP ac and hAP ac². More others on the way :-)
 
Erastus
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 133
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 4:14 pm
Location: Cape Town

Re: v6.11 released

Wed Apr 02, 2014 5:52 am

We had a crazy fault in our one 386 system. It was working well on ver .11 for the lat 2 weeks. Yesterday it started to rain very hard and quite consistent. All of a sudden all the radios on this system started to "disconnect".
Signal levels are all +/- -57 and did not change.
After I checked what I could I rebooted the system and the all channels are working 100%.
Don't know if this is weather related or something else.
Weill monitor a do another post if it happens again.
Did any one else experienced something similar?
disconnects.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
Jetrider
newbie
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 11:31 am

Re: v6.11 released

Wed Apr 02, 2014 9:43 am

What's the latest stable version for CCR? I need to move from 6.3 (pretty stable). It looks like 6.7 is the next stop?
Depends on what you use it for. For me I have 6.5, because 6.7 still has DHCP server on VLAN issue.
 
fievel
just joined
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2014 9:48 am

Re: v6.11 released

Wed Apr 02, 2014 9:52 am

I have a problem with openvpn server. I tried a bit yesterday and It's the option "Require Client Certificate" which cause the trouble. I see in changelog a lot of improvements in certificate managing. Do I have to regenerate the certificates ? I use self-signed certificate created with openssl on a Linux box.

Edit: Ok see topic : http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 03&start=0
Last edited by fievel on Wed Apr 02, 2014 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
uldis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 3424
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 2:55 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Wed Apr 02, 2014 11:02 am

/interface wireless set 0 frequency=auto channel-width=20/40mhz-ht-below

interface wireless monitor 0                 
                 status: running-ap
                   band: 2ghz-n
              frequency: 2412MHz
      wireless-protocol: 802.11

This puts the ht below and computers have issues connecting.

Can we get channel-width=20/40mhz-ht-auto?
With the new wireless-fp package the the driver will have that feature.
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Wed Apr 02, 2014 4:13 pm

Ticket#2014031766000331
6.10 BUG: user-manager profile limitation can not add profile limitation on command line when default admin customer are renamed, because missing "owner=" parameter.

This bug is still present on last official 6.11.
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 88#p416454

Still exist on 6.12rc1 2014-04-02
I try the other 2 bug I have discovered later
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
nuru
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 11:02 pm
Location: Kaduna, Nigeria

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Apr 03, 2014 2:41 pm

Has anyone tried the CAPsMan over wireless link. The CAP is connecting to the CAPsManager via NV2 radio using layer 3. The CAP get registered to the CAPsManager and 802.11b/g client are registered on the CAPsManager. The forwarding mode is enabled and datapath is a bridge with no physical interface on the bridge port and has a DHCP server. The 802.11b/g client is able to obtain an IP address after associating but cannot ping the IP on the bridge interface (Datapath).
However if the CAP is connected via wire to the CAPsManager it works flawlessly.
 
nuru
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 11:02 pm
Location: Kaduna, Nigeria

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Apr 03, 2014 4:01 pm

Has anyone tried the CAPsMan over wireless link. The CAP is connecting to the CAPsManager via NV2 radio using layer 3. The CAP get registered to the CAPsManager and 802.11b/g client are registered on the CAPsManager. The forwarding mode is enabled and datapath is a bridge with no physical interface on the bridge port and has a DHCP server. The 802.11b/g client is able to obtain an IP address after associating but cannot ping the IP on the bridge interface (Datapath).
However if the CAP is connected via wire to the CAPsManager it works flawlessly.
Am not sure if the problem was NV2. After changing the wireless protocol to 802.11, it started working
 
Clauu
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 205
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:27 pm
Location: RO

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Apr 04, 2014 9:42 am

I have mailed a ticket to suport but no answer.. after upgrade to latest ros 6.11 my vpn pptp connection keep reseting after couple of hours ~10-20 with the log error 'terminating peer not responding'. The internet connection its a business one from my work so it has nothing to do with it since the whole business is related to its uptime. Also in this time i have left a ping cmd opened between my network - work network and there is no interrupts 0 loss
Having fun with RB850Gx2, RB2011UiAS-2HnD, RB260GSP, RB751U-2HnD, CRS112, RB3011UiAS, hAP ac, cAP ac and hAP ac². More others on the way :-)
 
lelo
just joined
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 3:20 pm
Location: Poland

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Apr 04, 2014 5:48 pm

Hi all..

This is my first post on this forum.

Few days ago I have upgraded all our RB's in company from ROS 5.26 to 6.11.
The configuration we have is quite complex, vpn's (ipsec), ospf...

Today morning I received call from friend from office - nothing is working...

After quick investigation:

DHCP servers bounded to VLAN interfaces on our core RB1100AHx2 router had stopped functioning properly.
The log says:
server4 offering lease x.x.x.x for AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:FF without success
Thank's god.. I have unused RB450G with old ROS 5.26, on which I have set up DHCP for all VLAN's over single cable.

I very, very disappointed.
Why are guys releasing "stable" versions of ROS with such a BUGS ??
 
lelo
just joined
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 3:20 pm
Location: Poland

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Apr 04, 2014 5:49 pm

Hi all..

This is my first post on this forum.

Few days ago I have upgraded all our RB's in company from ROS 5.26 to 6.11.
The configuration we have is quite complex, vpn's (ipsec), ospf...

Today morning I received call from friend from office - nothing is working...

After quick investigation:

DHCP servers bounded to VLAN interfaces on our core RB1100AHx2 router had stopped functioning properly.
The log says:
server4 offering lease x.x.x.x for AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:FF without success
Thank's god.. I have unused RB450G with old ROS 5.26, on which I have set up DHCP for all VLAN's over single cable.

I am very, very disappointed.
Why are guys releasing "stable" versions of ROS with such a BUGS ??
 
grzes
just joined
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:17 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Apr 05, 2014 2:25 am

I have another problem. IP->ARP. On list when trying to 'make static' all defined bridges are removed :?
I tried twice and twice removed bridges.
 
User avatar
docmarius
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1210
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: Timisoara, Romania
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Apr 05, 2014 9:54 am

Just upgraded a brand new RB1100AHx2 to 6.11.
Under Resources, it shows Sector writes since reboot 0, Total sector writes 0, although I did save the configuration at least 3 times and have a dyndns script which writes a file on IP change.
Can anyone else confirm this?
Torturing CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+, RB450G, RB750GL, RB951G-2HnD, RB960PGS, RB260GSP, OmniTIK 5HnD and NetMetal 922UAGS-5HPacD + R11e-5HnD in my home network.
 
abeggled
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 4:00 pm
Location: Zollikofen, Switzerland

Re: v6.11 released

Sat Apr 05, 2014 9:59 am

Yes, but not for RB1100AHx2, for RB1100AH.
 
User avatar
chimaster
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:54 am
Location: Queenstown
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Apr 07, 2014 5:24 am

Over the weekend we upgraded our CCR1016-12G to 6.11, including Firmware to 3.12.

It runs approximately 80 L2TP DSL connections and some BGP/OSPF. After upgrade we've had our primary router fail twice, requiring power resets on both occasions. As it's off site in a Co-Lo it's hard to physically view it going down. Our secondary is also running 6.11 3.12 and operates as backup, it's been up for 2Days 18 Hours (since upgrade) even with load from DSL failing over to it for approx 10 Hours. We don't see any strange CPU spikes or anything, just stops.!

We're trying to run everything on secondary router to see if it stops after 10 hours of 80+ connections. Anyone else had stability issues with CCR on 6.11? Keen to hear.

Cheers
MTCNA - MTCWE - MTCRE - MTCINE - All round good guy and Linux nut
<plug>
HQWiFi making http://www.queenstown.com Wireless since 2001.
</plug>
 
lelo
just joined
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 3:20 pm
Location: Poland

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Apr 07, 2014 8:41 pm

docmarius, I confirm.
On my RB1100AHx2 after upgrade to 6.11:

Both Sector Writes Since Reboot and Total Sector Writes: 0
 
User avatar
chimaster
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:54 am
Location: Queenstown
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Apr 07, 2014 10:07 pm

Came in this morning, both primary and backup routers down. As secondary is in my office I Mac Winboxed in to receive these lovely messages.

apr/08 06:46:01 route,bgp,info RemoteAddress=10.1.1.1
apr/08 06:46:07 route,bgp,info Failed to open TCP connection: No buffer space available
apr/08 06:46:07 route,bgp,info RemoteAddress=112.68.40.192
apr/08 06:46:21 route,bgp,info Failed to open TCP connection: No buffer space available
apr/08 06:46:21 route,bgp,info RemoteAddress=112.68.40.192
apr/08 06:46:59 route,bgp,info Failed to open TCP connection: No buffer space available
apr/08 06:46:59 route,bgp,info RemoteAddress=112.68.40.192
apr/08 06:47:02 route,bgp,info Failed to open TCP connection: No buffer space available
apr/08 06:47:02 route,bgp,info RemoteAddress=10.1.1.1
apr/08 06:47:13 route,bgp,info Failed to open TCP connection: No buffer space available
apr/08 06:47:13 route,bgp,info RemoteAddress=112.68.40.192
apr/08 06:47:55 route,bgp,info Failed to open TCP connection: No buffer space available
apr/08 06:47:55 route,bgp,info RemoteAddress=112.68.40.192
apr/08 06:48:00 route,bgp,info Failed to open TCP connection: No buffer space available
apr/08 06:48:00 route,bgp,info RemoteAddress=10.1.1.1

We've made no changes since 6.6 which we were on aside from ROS and Firmware update. Otherwise exact same routers. I'm either going to roll back to 6.6 or take on board any other suggestions??? Generating support file and ticket also. Just thought I'd update everyone in case similar issues are being experienced.
MTCNA - MTCWE - MTCRE - MTCINE - All round good guy and Linux nut
<plug>
HQWiFi making http://www.queenstown.com Wireless since 2001.
</plug>
 
User avatar
docmarius
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1210
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: Timisoara, Romania
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:22 pm

I have seen another problem with 6.11, on the CRS-125:
After upgrading from 6.10, after about 2 days of functioning well, the device hangs completely, as if the switch would go amok.
No access to it, just a reset bringing it out of it (it can be reset from the LCD panel). There is no spout.
This happened to me twice, at almost perfect 45 hours interval.
Downgrade to 6.10 keeps it stable.
I will try to upgrade again to confirm the behavior.
Torturing CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+, RB450G, RB750GL, RB951G-2HnD, RB960PGS, RB260GSP, OmniTIK 5HnD and NetMetal 922UAGS-5HPacD + R11e-5HnD in my home network.
 
User avatar
chimaster
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:54 am
Location: Queenstown
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:33 am

Reporting Same issue, not 4 hours since moving back to primary router. Will be downgrading to 6.10 until resolved. Lots of flapping, 30 attempts to winbox in, slow, logs are not relevant to issue. Issuing reboot command can't afford to muck around as no physical access to router. However as router hasn't died but is in deaththrows failover is not active for our Layer 2.
MTCNA - MTCWE - MTCRE - MTCINE - All round good guy and Linux nut
<plug>
HQWiFi making http://www.queenstown.com Wireless since 2001.
</plug>
 
WirelessRudy
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 3078
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:54 pm
Location: Spain

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:35 am

After reading this lengthily tread several times I'll guess we can consider 6.10 to be the last stable version for now.... :?

Glad I didn't use the auto upgrade function. My whole network (with almost every type of rb's, vlan's, dhcp servers (over vlan), bridged and static routes) runs .10 now, some since it came out. No issues so far.
I have one cpe running 6.11. I'll guess that's as far as I'll have it penetrate my network...

See what .12 might bring us....


For the impatience among us, don't bother if MT is not answering your support request or any answers on this tread. The amount of reported bugs/problems is at such a scale they are obviously working hard to find out what went where and why and how wrong to correct them asap in a new release... be patient and keep the good spirit! :D
Show your appreciation of this post by giving me Karma! Thanks.

Rudy R. Puister

WISP operator based on MT routerboard & ROS.
 
nuru
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 11:02 pm
Location: Kaduna, Nigeria

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 08, 2014 2:05 am

Has anyone tried the CAPsMan over wireless link. The CAP is connecting to the CAPsManager via NV2 radio using layer 3. The CAP get registered to the CAPsManager and 802.11b/g client are registered on the CAPsManager. The forwarding mode is enabled and datapath is a bridge with no physical interface on the bridge port and has a DHCP server. The 802.11b/g client is able to obtain an IP address after associating but cannot ping the IP on the bridge interface (Datapath).
However if the CAP is connected via wire to the CAPsManager it works flawlessly.
Am not sure if the problem was NV2. After changing the wireless protocol to 802.11, it started working
Its not NV2 because it stopped pinging after rebooting. I think the CAPsMan does not work over wireless link.
 
samsung172
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1186
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 3:45 am
Location: Østfold - Norway
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 08, 2014 2:24 am

Failed to open TCP connection: No buffer space available <- A bug. also to be seen in pppoe. Is there a somehow memory leak or something "buffer leak" in 6.11?
 
AlexS
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 258
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 7:21 am

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 08, 2014 8:56 am

What's the latest stable version for CCR? I need to move from 6.3 (pretty stable). It looks like 6.7 is the next stop?

I am running 6.10 on CCR1036-8G-2S+

I had to move to 6.10 to lacp working.
Apart from not being able to push > 1Gb/s tcp sessions through the box, everything else seems to be working fine.

But it sounds like 6.11 might not be ready for me
 
User avatar
chimaster
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:54 am
Location: Queenstown
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:37 am

Confirm. Downgraded to 6.10. Stable again. Just downgrading secondary router tonight when everyone else is sleeping...
MTCNA - MTCWE - MTCRE - MTCINE - All round good guy and Linux nut
<plug>
HQWiFi making http://www.queenstown.com Wireless since 2001.
</plug>
 
farshidar
just joined
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 5:05 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:48 pm

Hi!
I have a problems after upgrade on v6.11 on my RB751U-2HnD (firmware: v3.13):

Device just freeze every 3-4 hours - it`s very bad for my work. I do power of and on. Later i set IP adress in "watchdog" tab, and device reboot automaticaly and works fine 3-4 hours and history repeat.
I aways updgrade new version in this device when new release at soon, and i never not have problem. Whats wrong?

...But another my device RB751U-2HnD, and more different models works fine, but hes is works with a most simple configuration

Of cause? I don`t imagine my work without MikroTik! Perfectly product line!

Sorry for my Eng.. :o

Thanks!

I have a same problem-Downgrade to 6.10
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 08, 2014 2:13 pm

Ticket#2014031766000331
6.10 BUG: user-manager profile limitation can not add profile limitation on command line when default admin customer are renamed, because missing "owner=" parameter.

This bug is still present on last official 6.11.
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 88#p416454

Still exist on 6.12rc1 2014-04-02
I try the other 2 bug I have discovered later
Still exist on 6.12rc1 (2014-Apr-07 09:04):
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.11 released

Tue Apr 08, 2014 2:17 pm

Image

6.12rc1 (2014-Apr-07 09:04):

Winbox field alignment on Firewall section FIXED.
Last edited by rextended on Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
User avatar
chimaster
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:54 am
Location: Queenstown
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Wed Apr 09, 2014 1:19 am

6.10 crashed again this morning, rolling right back to 6.6. Can't afford more of these outages.
MTCNA - MTCWE - MTCRE - MTCINE - All round good guy and Linux nut
<plug>
HQWiFi making http://www.queenstown.com Wireless since 2001.
</plug>
 
User avatar
SiB
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: Poland

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Apr 10, 2014 10:01 am

CCR1016-12G v6.11 and after 11h (max 70h) I have DENY/BLOCK any communication via IPv4 to/from MT.
Connection to MT are work only via RS232.

One core have 100%:
6 cpu6 100% 1% 0%

Output by L3:
/ping 217.67.x.y    
HOST                                     SIZE TTL TIME  STATUS                 
                                                        105 (No buffer space...
                                                        105 (No buffer space...
                                                        105 (No buffer space...
                                                        105 (No buffer space...
    sent=4 received=0 packet-loss=100%
/ping arp-ping=yes address=217.67.x.y interface=ether1
HOST                                     SIZE TTL TIME  STATUS                 
00:0C:CF:FC:58:1A                                 0ms  
00:0C:CF:FC:58:1A                                 0ms  
    sent=7 received=7 packet-loss=0% min-rtt=0ms avg-rtt=0ms max-rtt=0ms
But MicroTik Discovery Protocol not work from outsite, test on 3 interfaces.

Case is report to Microtik support, I plan downgrade to 6.4 (last working version with hung/watchdog reboot about 2-3mts).

BTW. LCD is freeze when I go to 'Interfaces > ether1 > Stats > Bandwidth', screen: prntscr.com/38m4n5
Log in reboot process: 'failed to stop lcdstat: std failure: timeout (13)'
 
User avatar
chimaster
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:54 am
Location: Queenstown
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Apr 10, 2014 11:15 am

Sounds like same issue as me. Did you have any BGP running?
MTCNA - MTCWE - MTCRE - MTCINE - All round good guy and Linux nut
<plug>
HQWiFi making http://www.queenstown.com Wireless since 2001.
</plug>
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5913
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Apr 10, 2014 2:02 pm

no buffer space is related to L2TP. If you have L2TP configured then this problem will be fixed in v6.12.
 
Elissen
just joined
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:27 pm

Re: v6.11 released

Thu Apr 10, 2014 5:01 pm

no buffer space is related to L2TP. If you have L2TP configured then this problem will be fixed in v6.12.
I've been sending supout files in relation to no buffer space errors. Unfortunatly I did not get a response to my e-mails. Could you please look at 2013050666000323 if my issues is the same issue?
And yes, we use l2tp a lot.
 
nosovk
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:25 am
Location: Ukraine
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Apr 11, 2014 12:28 am

vlans is down.
All is ok on RoS 6,9.
6,10-6,11 doesnt work. You cant get adress from dhcp server via vlan.
Аренда Програмного обеспечения
https://www.CloudZZ.com
Микротики на Украине оптом
mikrotik.kharkov.ua
 
User avatar
Alfabi
newbie
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 9:52 am
Location: Ukraine
Contact:

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:29 am

im have troubles with bridges - bridge become unknown, reboot fix problem....

where download link 6.12 is already fixed????
http://www.bios-computer.com - Fastest WISP in UA
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24077
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:58 am

docmarius, I confirm.
On my RB1100AHx2 after upgrade to 6.11:

Both Sector Writes Since Reboot and Total Sector Writes: 0
This was never supported on RB1100 due to specific file system on RB1100. It was not showing on previous versions too
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
User avatar
SiB
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 73
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: Poland

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:46 pm

no buffer space is related to L2TP. If you have L2TP configured then this problem will be fixed in v6.12.
Thanks, I have sure now about that release have got fix on this problem. I plan upgrade to this v6.12rc1 asap.
I'm not use BGP.
 
willbur
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 58
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 8:58 am

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Apr 11, 2014 4:52 pm

im have troubles with bridges - bridge become unknown, reboot fix problem....

where download link 6.12 is already fixed????
Same. So disgusted with MK right now! It's not like we can easily drive to our customer sites.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24077
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Apr 11, 2014 5:03 pm

im have troubles with bridges - bridge become unknown, reboot fix problem....

where download link 6.12 is already fixed????
Same. So disgusted with MK right now! It's not like we can easily drive to our customer sites.
try this pre-release issue (not final, some issues with tunnels not completely fixed):

CCR http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... e-6.12.npk
PPC: http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... c-6.12.npk
MIPS BE: http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... e-6.12.npk
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
willbur
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 58
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 8:58 am

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Apr 11, 2014 6:18 pm

im have troubles with bridges - bridge become unknown, reboot fix problem....

where download link 6.12 is already fixed????
Same. So disgusted with MK right now! It's not like we can easily drive to our customer sites.
try this pre-release issue (not final, some issues with tunnels not completely fixed):

CCR http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... e-6.12.npk
PPC: http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... c-6.12.npk
MIPS BE: http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... e-6.12.npk
What are the risks of downgrading while not having someone out onsite? I hate to say it Normunds, but were at the point of not knowing which versions are truly the stable ones... We've got about 20% of routers coming back because of this exact issue with 6.11. I think Mikrotik is taking on too much between CAPSman, wireless, new products, etc. I think its time to slow down and start focusing on what needs to be fixed rather than launching a continual of products with bugs.
 
willbur
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 58
Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 8:58 am

Re: v6.11 released

Fri Apr 11, 2014 8:13 pm

After reading this lengthily tread several times I'll guess we can consider 6.10 to be the last stable version for now.... :?

Glad I didn't use the auto upgrade function. My whole network (with almost every type of rb's, vlan's, dhcp servers (over vlan), bridged and static routes) runs .10 now, some since it came out. No issues so far.
I have one cpe running 6.11. I'll guess that's as far as I'll have it penetrate my network...

See what .12 might bring us....


For the impatience among us, don't bother if MT is not answering your support request or any answers on this tread. The amount of reported bugs/problems is at such a scale they are obviously working hard to find out what went where and why and how wrong to correct them asap in a new release... be patient and keep the good spirit! :D
The entirety of V6 seems to be botched with no end in sight.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests