Community discussions

 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24205
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 3:12 pm

What's new in 6.12
*) l2tp - fixed ~no buffer space available~ problem;
*) ipsec - support IPv4 over IPv6 and vice versa;
*) pppoe - report correctly number of active links;
*) updated timezone information;
*) many fixes for CRS managed switch functionality -
particularly improved VLAN support, port isolation, defaults;
*) added trunk support for CRS switches;
*) added policing support for CRS switches;
*) www - added support for HTTP byte ranges;
*) lte - provide signal strength using snmp and make 'info once' work in console;
Simply click “Check for updates” in QuickSet, Webfig or Winbox packages menu. If you run v5 or older, download the newest NPK package from our webpage, upload to your router, and reboot: http://www.mikrotik.com/download
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 3:17 pm

Ticket#2014031766000331
6.10 BUG: user-manager profile limitation can not add profile limitation on command line when default admin customer are renamed, because missing "owner=" parameter.

This bug is still present on last official 6.11.
Still exist on 6.12rc1 2014-04-02
I try the other 2 bug I have discovered later
Still exist on 6.12rc1 (2014-Apr-07 09:04):
STILL EXIST ON 6.12
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 88#p416454

BUG SIGNALED FROM 6.10 AND STILL NOT FIXED??? :evil:

Opened another ticket for that: [Ticket#2014041566000226] 6.12 UNFIXED BUG: user-manager profile limitation


:( OK, I UNDERSTAND,
is more important to fix CRS than this "limited" option....

I wait the fix on 6.13.... :?
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8308
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 3:38 pm

*) updated timezone information;
-3 is still +3:
[admin@TestPlace] > /system clock print 
            time: 15:37:53
            date: apr/15/2014
  time-zone-name: Etc/GMT-3
      gmt-offset: +03:00
this exists even in v5
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
kcybulski
just joined
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 1:45 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 3:45 pm

So far good

Upgraded on RB2011UAS and RB2011L no problems so far.
Packet marks work on RB2011UAS.

Krzysiek
 
User avatar
CyberTod
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 511
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:23 am

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 3:54 pm

RouterOS upgraded fine from v6.11 to v6.12 on a RB951Ui-2HnD, but upgrading the routerboard firmware from 3.12 to 3.14 caused a series of reboot loops before it settled and started working.
Anyone else seeing this ? Because that was my router at home, so no harm done, but I plan to upgrade a few Metal 2SHPn on towers to see if a problem on them is fixed .

P.S. Hmm actually forget the part about the Metal's. i just upgraded 1, but their firmware stays at 3.13.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24205
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 3:57 pm

Chupaka, why don't you just use your city? That one works always

ros code

[admin@auto] /system clock> set time-zone-name=Europe/Minsk
[admin@auto] /system clock> print
            time: 15:56:32
            date: apr/15/2014
  time-zone-name: Europe/Minsk
      gmt-offset: +03:00
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
User avatar
pcunite
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 945
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 5:13 am
Location: USA

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:02 pm

*) www - added support for HTTP byte ranges;
That sounds interesting. Can someone give me a link to the doc's on that?
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:05 pm

THIS KERNEL BUG ARE NOT SOLVED ON 6.12 (final)!!!

http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 00#p417272
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24205
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:06 pm

*) www - added support for HTTP byte ranges;
That sounds interesting. Can someone give me a link to the doc's on that?
http://www.cyberciti.biz/cloud-computin ... line-test/
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
andriys
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1179
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 1:59 pm
Location: Kharkiv, Ukraine

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:07 pm

*) www - added support for HTTP byte ranges;
That sounds interesting. Can someone give me a link to the doc's on that?
RFC2616 section 14.35.1 (see here). :)
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8308
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:10 pm

Sorry, had missed this before. Did you submit a ticket? I wonder how we missed this.
sure, Ticket#2011111666000887. Maris said, "problem will be fixed in one of the next versions". I'm waiting that version for 2,5 years already :D

UPD: I also mentioned this problem in Ticket#2013121166000256
Chupaka, why don't you just use your city? That one works always
I know, but there were recent changes in Belarus timezone, and TZ info was not actual in RouterOS until the december, 2013 :)
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:21 pm

This version has just come out, and for now there are three old ticket still unresolved:

Ticket#2014031766000331 (2014-03-17) Missing parameters on CLI
Ticket#2014032566001217 (2014-03-25) KERNEL CRASH / PANIC
Last edited by normis on Thu Apr 24, 2014 9:39 am, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: not a bug
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
User avatar
doneware
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 515
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:39 pm
Location: Hungary

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:22 pm

l2tp - fixed ~no buffer space available~ problem;
no buffer problem still seems to persist in 6.12.
but this time it's not related to l2tp. i have a box with GRE over IPSec tunnels
(~80 tunnels) and run BGP over them.
just had to restart the device 4 hours ago because of "no buffer space avail".
#TR0359
 
andriys
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1179
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 1:59 pm
Location: Kharkiv, Ukraine

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:27 pm

just had to restart the device 4 hours ago because of "no buffer space avail".
Hm... 6.12 was officially announced less then 4 hours ago...
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24205
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:37 pm

l2tp - fixed ~no buffer space available~ problem;
no buffer problem still seems to persist in 6.12.
but this time it's not related to l2tp. i have a box with GRE over IPSec tunnels
(~80 tunnels) and run BGP over them.
just had to restart the device 4 hours ago because of "no buffer space avail".
If you have it running for more than 4 hours, it could mean you are not running the version that was just released now. Upgrade to the one on the webpage please.
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24205
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:55 pm

rextended, please do NOT re-post all the fixed issues here. Post only NOT fixed issues if you find any. Thanks!
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
User avatar
doneware
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 515
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:39 pm
Location: Hungary

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 5:01 pm

just had to restart the device 4 hours ago because of "no buffer space avail".
Hm... 6.12 was officially announced less then 4 hours ago...
it was the 6.12 from 11th april. Normis posted the url to it in one of the other threads. checked the changelog,
and as it stated the buffer space issue to be fixed, i gave it a try. now i am running the official image
(build date: Apr/14/2014 09:27:45)
#TR0359
 
efaden
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1711
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 1:55 am
Location: New York, USA

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 5:14 pm

When can we expect more complete documentation with examples for the CRS?
 
dtoffo
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:19 am

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 5:23 pm

What about CAPsMAN (wireless-fp package): is it still beta or production-stable?
 
DiabolixZA
newbie
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 5:06 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 5:58 pm

*) lte - provide signal strength using snmp and make 'info once' work in console;
SNMP for LTE signal strength, but yet we see nothing for CCQ..
 
adyb76
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 11:45 am

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 6:55 pm

RB450, RB2011UiAS-2HnD, RB1100AHX2, CCR1036-12G-4S all updated ok

Running PPPoE, OSPF, MPLS and TE

Ade
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 7:39 pm

rextended, please do NOT re-post all the fixed issues here. Post only NOT fixed issues if you find any. Thanks!
Sorry, I have posted that for prevent question like "Are fixed this problem....?" not written on change log.
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
User avatar
macgaiver
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1721
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 5:57 pm
Location: Sol III, Sol system, Sector 001, Alpha Quadrant

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:35 pm

I can give a nickname to this version "CRS Evolution version" it is good that these changes got out as soon as possible, now at least we can start using CRS properly.
I'm sure there will be other version with other fixes soon enough. And if MT fixes your bug you usually can get a RC version to verify that bug is solved.

Now i have lots of new toys in "Switch" menu :)
With great knowledge comes great responsibility, because of ability to recognize id... incompetent people much faster.
 
JanezFord
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 263
Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 10:58 am

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 10:07 pm

Winbox checkboxes and textboxes are back to pre v6.11 style .... good work! I see new switch menu design in winbox on crs125.

upgraded crs125, 450g, 711ua-2hnd, 751u-2hnd, 751g-2hnd, 951g-2hnd, 951ui-2hnd, 2011uas-rm, 2011uas-2hnd-in 912u-2hnd and rb800 to 6.12 + firware where applicable without any issues. All running fine (ipsec, ospf, l2tp)

JF.
 
dlj87
just joined
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2012 8:52 am

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:00 pm

OpenVPN server doesn't work! The same TLS failed error in log as it was in 6.11. Downgrade to 6.10
 
plankanater
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 166
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 3:56 am

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:38 pm

Still loosing interfaces in /Interface Bridge Filters. It will take the interface in the rule then after about 3 seconds after hitting apply it will minimize the interface field on the general page. If I reopen the field it is still, but re-minimizes as soon as OK, or Apply is hit. So the ability to mark packets by interface in a bridge seems to be lost.
 
User avatar
Jetrider
newbie
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 11:31 am

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 12:07 am

Anyone tried DHCP server on VLAN with this ? Is all fine now ?
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 12:12 am

Anyone tried DHCP server on VLAN with this ? Is all fine now ?
Try yourself and post the result.
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
lorsungcu
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 80
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 11:11 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:07 am

6.12 completely broke my ipsec/l2tp tunnels. Not sure what the problem is at this point, but i'll be moving back to 6.11 until i figure it out..
 
efaden
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1711
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 1:55 am
Location: New York, USA

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:09 am

6.12 completely broke my ipsec/l2tp tunnels. Not sure what the problem is at this point, but i'll be moving back to 6.11 until i figure it out..
Interesting. Mine are working just fine.
 
User avatar
nz_monkey
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1818
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:53 pm
Location: Straya
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 5:41 am

6.12 completely broke my ipsec/l2tp tunnels. Not sure what the problem is at this point, but i'll be moving back to 6.11 until i figure it out..
Interesting. Mine are working just fine.
For the first time since about 6.5 upgrading DID NOT break my IPSEC tunnels :) Thanks Mikrotik.
http://thebrotherswisp.com/ | Mikrotik MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCINE | Fortinet FTCNA, FCNSP, FCT | Extreme Networks ENA
 
evharten
newbie
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:20 am
Location: Capelle a/d IJssel, The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 5:56 am

6.12 broke my CRS's, had to go into serial console to reset configuration and build the config as new, system just hangs after updating.

Another CRS hangs even after the reset-configuration, im trying to reproduce it so i can get an supout (if that works at least, since the switch disables ALL ports when it hangs).

Addenum:
Trunk feature does not work properly, trunk stops forwarding packages after some time (802.11ad LACP), after removing and recreating the trunk it works for a while, and then stops working again.
https://www.mikroshop.nl - The Dutch Mikrotik Store!
 
User avatar
chimaster
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 8:54 am
Location: Queenstown
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 7:33 am

Upgrade to 6.12 FW 3.13 no worries on CCR1016-12G. Had major L2TP issues with 6.11 rolled back to 6.6 and have now updated to 6.12 to test L2TP Buffer space issue is resolved.

Five Hours in. So far so good... Fingers crossed for a full recovery from two weeks of absolute instability.
MTCNA - MTCWE - MTCRE - MTCINE - All round good guy and Linux nut
<plug>
HQWiFi making http://www.queenstown.com Wireless since 2001.
</plug>
 
User avatar
Aveyer
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:17 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 8:19 am

Upgraded from 5.26 to 6.12 on RB750GL and RB450G, so far so good.
 
npero
Member
Member
Posts: 316
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:59 pm
Location: Serbia

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 8:20 am

Ticket#2014032466000827 not fixed, it is not working in last couple version, also other user on forum confirm bug.
When it will be fixed ?
 
User avatar
Jetrider
newbie
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 11:31 am

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 9:19 am

Try yourself and post the result.

Sorry, unable to comply. Every version since 6.5 has been a huge disappointment so far resulting major outages. Cannot risk that production environment device. To be honest this "try yourself and post result" attitude got me thinking, that maybe I should fix it myself, too. Or simply not use DHCP maybe ? :D
 
tedkuban
just joined
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 9:15 am

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 9:23 am

IPSEC was totally broken after upgrade from 6.11 and from 5.26. Comments in the changelog on need of changes in a config are absent.
 
evharten
newbie
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:20 am
Location: Capelle a/d IJssel, The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 9:38 am

Try yourself and post the result.

Sorry, unable to comply. Every version since 6.5 has been a huge disappointment so far resulting major outages. Cannot risk that production environment device. To be honest this "try yourself and post result" attitude got me thinking, that maybe I should fix it myself, too. Or simply not use DHCP maybe ? :D
This is the community forums, IF you have bugs that you want fixed you should email support, if something breaks during/after an upgrade you can email support for support (or the company that have sold you the unit).

Here people will say try it, and post results, as that is what we all do ;)
Community is willing to help you, but if you did not try it first yourself, there is nothing we can help, as we do not know your situation nor configuration.
And new features, or bugfixes are fixed (maybe not but thats something WE as community test).

ps. this is not to flame at you! we are merely trying to help you.
https://www.mikroshop.nl - The Dutch Mikrotik Store!
 
infused
Member
Member
Posts: 305
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:33 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 11:01 am

CRS test unit on 6.12 runs sweet as.
 
evharten
newbie
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:20 am
Location: Capelle a/d IJssel, The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 11:04 am

CRS test unit on 6.12 runs sweet as.
You did not have to reset the configuration ?
https://www.mikroshop.nl - The Dutch Mikrotik Store!
 
evharten
newbie
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:20 am
Location: Capelle a/d IJssel, The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 11:16 am

Trunk failure ticket #2014041666000341

Includes the supout.rif at the time of failure.
after disabling one of the interfaces in the trunk it starts working again, seems that the trunk option is not yet 802.11ad compliant.
https://www.mikroshop.nl - The Dutch Mikrotik Store!
 
bootc
just joined
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 1:01 am

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 11:58 am

6.12 broke my CRS's, had to go into serial console to reset configuration and build the config as new, system just hangs after updating.

Another CRS hangs even after the reset-configuration, im trying to reproduce it so i can get an supout (if that works at least, since the switch disables ALL ports when it hangs).
I was running a 6.12rc and it was working fine. Upgraded to 6.12 release and it hung on reboot, and comes up with all ports disabled. I can login at the serial console but commands like
/interface print
just hang. Reset-configuration works (eventually) but putting my config back breaks it after a reboot.

I too am working on a reproducible config that breaks the CCR. I hope to be able to post something soon.
 
firefly
just joined
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 7:23 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 12:05 pm

 
bootc
just joined
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 1:01 am

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 12:25 pm

6.12 broke my CRS's, had to go into serial console to reset configuration and build the config as new, system just hangs after updating.

Another CRS hangs even after the reset-configuration, im trying to reproduce it so i can get an supout (if that works at least, since the switch disables ALL ports when it hangs).
I too am working on a reproducible config that breaks the CCR. I hope to be able to post something soon.
The following configuration sets up the CRS for a fall, but still works at this point after a reboot:
/interface ethernet
set [ find default-name=ether2 ] master-port=ether1
set [ find default-name=ether3 ] master-port=ether1
set [ find default-name=ether4 ] master-port=ether1
set [ find default-name=ether5 ] master-port=ether1
set [ find default-name=ether6 ] master-port=ether1
set [ find default-name=ether7 ] master-port=ether1
set [ find default-name=ether8 ] master-port=ether1
set [ find default-name=ether9 ] master-port=ether1
set [ find default-name=ether10 ] master-port=ether1
set [ find default-name=ether11 ] master-port=ether1
set [ find default-name=ether12 ] master-port=ether1
set [ find default-name=ether13 ] master-port=ether1
set [ find default-name=ether14 ] master-port=ether1
set [ find default-name=ether15 ] master-port=ether1
set [ find default-name=ether16 ] master-port=ether1
set [ find default-name=ether17 ] master-port=ether1
set [ find default-name=ether18 ] master-port=ether1
set [ find default-name=ether19 ] master-port=ether1
set [ find default-name=ether20 ] master-port=ether1
set [ find default-name=ether21 ] master-port=ether1
set [ find default-name=ether22 ] master-port=ether1
set [ find default-name=ether23 ] master-port=ether1
set [ find default-name=ether24 ] master-port=ether1
set [ find default-name=sfp1 ] master-port=ether1
/interface vlan
add interface=ether1 vlan-id=1
add interface=ether1 vlan-id=1000
/interface ethernet switch
set forward-unknown-vlan=no
/interface ethernet switch vlan
add ports=ether1,ether2,switch1-cpu vlan-id=1
add ports=ether23,ether24 vlan-id=1000
Adding the following will appear to "work" after it's been added (it doesn't due to the lack of matching egress config, but would work if that was added too), but causes the switch to fail at reboot:
/interface ethernet switch ingress-vlan-translation
add new-customer-vid=1 ports=ether1,ether2
add new-customer-vid=1000 ports=ether23,ether24
 
killersoft
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 134
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 2:34 pm
Location: Victoria, Australia
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 12:52 pm

NTP Client seems to still have an issue(as of 6.11, v6.10 had no issues) on MT Metals 2SHPn's(WILL NOT SET System clock time).
My RB951G(v5.26) on the same subnet with the same NTP config has no issue with setting the system time.
Think it might be Supout.rif time... !
MIT, BIT, ITIL, CERT IV Electronics.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24205
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:19 pm

NTP Client seems to still have an issue(as of 6.11, v6.10 had no issues) on MT Metals 2SHPn's(WILL NOT SET System clock time).
My RB951G(v5.26) on the same subnet with the same NTP config has no issue with setting the system time.
Think it might be Supout.rif time... !
did you try another server ?
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
infused
Member
Member
Posts: 305
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:33 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:23 pm

CRS test unit on 6.12 runs sweet as.
You did not have to reset the configuration ?
I hardly had any config. The config I had worked fine though.
 
bawolek
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 60
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 3:33 pm
Location: Poland/Wroclaw

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:44 pm

what about with link aggregation (802.3ad) doing on switch-chip ..
i'm waiting for that on CRS ...
 
Fatum
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:22 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:03 pm

 
hengst
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 3:04 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:37 pm

BUG ?

dhcp request via radius.

wont send anything to radius server when "Called ID" is used. ( nothing in log )

without anything in the "Called ID" , radius request is sent to radius server and all ok.

typo somwhere ? caller id / called id ? just my 2 cents
 
Krisken
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 132
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:35 am

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:26 pm

Is the DHCP server problem for vlans fixed?
 
Zorro
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 676
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:43 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:30 pm

all RB2011's and 951's so far so good.
not tested 450g, 433 and AP's yet, but kinda enthusiastically about.
found its both boots and works faster(and marginal but very welcome and handy latency drop) and also L2 filtering on copper start working again(cool !! no need to use v5.xx in such cases anymore).
i guess that's was new routerboard firmware impact.
also thanks for fixing fields in firewall management, back ).
previous versions (both 6.10 and 6.11)was looped into panic-reboot/netinstall after upgrade on some of rb2011 bodies. some right after reboot, some - after firmware update. 6.12 is okay on ALL, cool(no downtime is cool, isn't ? :)

p.s.
any chance to get CoDel in future releases ? :)
 
pateutz
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 5:55 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:49 pm

Hi all,

after upgrade from 6.11 to 6.12 the IPSEC tunnels not working any more. I have downgraded back to 6.11 and now i am able to make connections to my IPSEC VPN tunnels.
I have defined the the configuration of the IPSEC VPN tunnels since version 5. So since then i have never change anything in the configuration.

Best Regards,

Daniel
 
User avatar
paoloaga
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 222
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:52 am
Location: Vaprio d'Agogna (NO) - Italy
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:52 pm

6.12 broke my CRS's, had to go into serial console to reset configuration and build the config as new, system just hangs after updating.
Another CRS hangs even after the reset-configuration, im trying to reproduce it so i can get an supout (if that works at least, since the switch disables ALL ports when it hangs).
I was running a 6.12rc and it was working fine. Upgraded to 6.12 release and it hung on reboot, and comes up with all ports disabled. I can login at the serial console but commands like
/interface print
just hang. Reset-configuration works (eventually) but putting my config back breaks it after a reboot.

I too am working on a reproducible config that breaks the CCR. I hope to be able to post something soon.
I am experiencing the very same problem. The switch seems to run fine with the default config, but as soon as I add some vlan features (ingress vlan translation and egress vlan translation) works for a few minutes and then hangs. It also keeps hanging at the boot, responds to the console but it doesn't execute "/print interface ethernet".

I'm working to generate a supout.rif.

Edit: it doesn't execute "/interface ethernet print" -- apologize for the typo.
Last edited by paoloaga on Wed Apr 16, 2014 6:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
fposavec
newbie
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 12:59 pm
Location: Čakovec
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 4:18 pm

6.12 broke my CRS's, had to go into serial console to reset configuration and build the config as new, system just hangs after updating.
Another CRS hangs even after the reset-configuration, im trying to reproduce it so i can get an supout (if that works at least, since the switch disables ALL ports when it hangs).
I was running a 6.12rc and it was working fine. Upgraded to 6.12 release and it hung on reboot, and comes up with all ports disabled. I can login at the serial console but commands like
/interface print
just hang. Reset-configuration works (eventually) but putting my config back breaks it after a reboot.

I too am working on a reproducible config that breaks the CCR. I hope to be able to post something soon.
I am experiencing the very same problem. The switch seems to run fine with the default config, but as soon as I add some vlan features (ingress vlan translation and egress vlan translation) works for a few minutes and then hangs. It also keeps hanging at the boot, responds to the console but it doesn't execute "/print interface ethernet".

I'm working to generate a supout.rif.
I already send support.rif to support, waiting to anwser...
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8308
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 4:22 pm

Anyone tried DHCP server on VLAN with this ? Is all fine now ?
Is the DHCP server problem for vlans fixed?
what was the problem? I have a CCR with DHCP Servers on VLANs, it worked fine on v6.7 and it works now on v6.12
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
huntah
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 3:24 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 7:15 pm

DHCP on VLAN was also working on 6.11.. I am using it right now without problems. I reported that back in 6.11 released topic..
 
Clauu
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 205
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:27 pm
Location: RO

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 7:35 pm

Good job devs team now with the latest update the usb power is much more stable :) I have almost 1 day uptime of a usb 3g modem where on <=6.11 it was a nightmare no more than 2hours of uptime
Having fun with RB850Gx2, RB2011UiAS-2HnD, RB260GSP, RB751U-2HnD, CRS112, RB3011UiAS, hAP ac, cAP ac and hAP ac². More others on the way :-)
 
Test471
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:39 am

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 8:55 pm

What's new in CAPsMAN 6.12?
 
bawolek
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 60
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 3:33 pm
Location: Poland/Wroclaw

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 9:15 pm


:) thanks I don't read wiki with crs option :)
 
ners
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 99
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 9:57 pm

CRS on 6.12, ip addresses on physical interfaces ("native VLAN") stopped working:

ros code

/ip address
add address=172.16.16.8/24 interface=ether24 network=172.16.16.0
/interface ethernet
set [ find default-name=sfp1 ] master-port=ether24
set [ find default-name=ether1 ] master-port=ether24
set [ find default-name=ether2 ] master-port=ether24
set [ find default-name=ether3 ] master-port=ether24
set [ find default-name=ether4 ] master-port=ether24
set [ find default-name=ether5 ] master-port=ether24
set [ find default-name=ether6 ] master-port=ether24
set [ find default-name=ether7 ] master-port=ether24
set [ find default-name=ether8 ] master-port=ether24
set [ find default-name=ether9 ] master-port=ether24
set [ find default-name=ether10 ] master-port=ether24
set [ find default-name=ether11 ] master-port=ether24
set [ find default-name=ether12 ] master-port=ether24
set [ find default-name=ether13 ] master-port=ether24
set [ find default-name=ether14 ] master-port=ether24
set [ find default-name=ether15 ] master-port=ether24
set [ find default-name=ether16 ] master-port=ether24
set [ find default-name=ether17 ] master-port=ether24
set [ find default-name=ether18 ] master-port=ether24
set [ find default-name=ether19 ] master-port=ether24
set [ find default-name=ether20 ] master-port=ether24
set [ find default-name=ether21 ] master-port=ether24
set [ find default-name=ether22 ] master-port=ether24
set [ find default-name=ether23 ] master-port=ether24

/interface ethernet switch
set drop-if-invalid-or-src-port-not-member-of-vlan-on-ports="ether1,ether2,ether3,ether4,ether5,ether6,ether7,ether8,ether9,ether10,\
    ether11,ether12,ether13,ether14,ether15,ether16,ether17,ether18,ether19,ether20,ether21,ether22,ether23,ether24" \
    forward-unknown-vlan=no
/interface ethernet switch egress-vlan-tag
add tagged-ports=ether24 vlan-id=59
/interface ethernet switch ingress-vlan-translation
add customer-vid=0 new-customer-vid=59 ports=ether1 sa-learning=yes
/interface ethernet switch vlan
add ports=ether1,ether24 vlan-id=59
172.16.16.8 cannot be pinged from other hosts in the network.
 
h17
just joined
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 10:01 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 16, 2014 10:21 pm

Anyone tried DHCP server on VLAN with this ? Is all fine now ?
Is the DHCP server problem for vlans fixed?
what was the problem? I have a CCR with DHCP Servers on VLANs, it worked fine on v6.7 and it works now on v6.12
Same here. I've been using DHCP Servers on VLANs at home since version 3.x, through almost every one
till now (6.11, didn't upgrade to 6.12 yet - I'm on vacation). I've never spotted any single problem with this.
Tested on 433AH, 435GUAH, 450G, 1100AHx2 and CCR1036-12G-4S.

P.S.
This is my first post here. Hello everyone. :)
 
User avatar
dibatech
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 81
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 10:14 am

CCR1016-12G vlan issue.

Wed Apr 16, 2014 11:12 pm

CCR1016-12G
Strange vlan issue.
Added vlan 1286 on ether12 via winbox.
Close winbox, reopen, vlan now missing.
Under vlans tab in interfaces setup, there is a ppp-XXXX dynamic user listed??
Seems like the vlan interface name / index however mikrotik does it gets corrupted.

Resetted board to defaults, restored config from rsc export. Same result.
Downgraded to 6.7 and all seems well again.

Could not create supout.rif, as this unit was in production at the time and clients was going crazy.
Will try and recreate again and log ticket.
 
User avatar
Aveyer
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:17 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 17, 2014 1:19 am

I'm using DHCP on vlans on RB750GL and RB450G, no issues at all.
 
ddt
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 3:18 am

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 17, 2014 3:22 am

Old VLAN code working on 6.11:
/interface ethernet switch ingress-vlan-translation
add customer-vid=0 new-customer-vid=701 ports=ether2 sa-learning=yes
/interface ethernet switch egress-vlan-translation
add customer-vid=701 new-customer-vid=0 ports=ether2
This correctly exports on a CRS still running 6.11.

New export code of the above if put into 6.12:
/interface ethernet switch ingress-vlan-translation
add customer-vid=0 new-customer-vid=701 ports=ether2 sa-learning=yes
/interface ethernet switch egress-vlan-translation
add customer-vid=701 new-customer-vid="(unknown)" ports=ether2
If more than one entry is in the egress field with "(unknown)" the router will freeze on bootup during the "Starting services" display output on the LCD.
 
littlebill
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 231
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 3:11 am

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:42 am

is pptp and winbox fixed? how about sstp and windows clients? did anyone confirm this working? its been broken a while
 
User avatar
Aveyer
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:17 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 17, 2014 7:22 am

On one of my RB450G', opening the OSPF menu causes winbox to crash everytime. This doesn't happen on all the rest that I upgraded however, which are in production.
This router wasn't in production, it was connected directly to laptop.

I had to reset to defaults and reconfigure, then no more crashing.
 
mboy
just joined
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 7:23 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:10 am

New export code of the above if put into 6.12:
/interface ethernet switch ingress-vlan-translation
add customer-vid=0 new-customer-vid=701 ports=ether2 sa-learning=yes
/interface ethernet switch egress-vlan-translation
add customer-vid=701 new-customer-vid="(unknown)" ports=ether2
If more than one entry is in the egress field with "(unknown)" the router will freeze on bootup during the "Starting services" display output on the LCD.
I have the same problem, what can be done?
 
ners
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 99
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:42 am

Old VLAN code working on 6.11:
/interface ethernet switch ingress-vlan-translation
add customer-vid=0 new-customer-vid=701 ports=ether2 sa-learning=yes
/interface ethernet switch egress-vlan-translation
add customer-vid=701 new-customer-vid=0 ports=ether2
This correctly exports on a CRS still running 6.11.

New export code of the above if put into 6.12:
/interface ethernet switch ingress-vlan-translation
add customer-vid=0 new-customer-vid=701 ports=ether2 sa-learning=yes
/interface ethernet switch egress-vlan-translation
add customer-vid=701 new-customer-vid="(unknown)" ports=ether2
If more than one entry is in the egress field with "(unknown)" the router will freeze on bootup during the "Starting services" display output on the LCD.
Just delete the following section altogether:

ros code

/interface ethernet switch egress-vlan-translation
add customer-vid=701 new-customer-vid="(unknown)" ports=ether2
I found out setting egress-vlan-translation is not needed to make the port "access" anymore. Just "ingress-vlan-translation" is all that needs to be set.
 
User avatar
cdiedrich
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 905
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 2:03 pm
Location: Basel, Switzerland // Bremen, Germany
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:49 am

after upgrade from 6.11 to 6.12 the IPSEC tunnels not working any more. I have downgraded back to 6.11 and now i am able to make connections to my IPSEC VPN tunnels.
I have defined the the configuration of the IPSEC VPN tunnels since version 5. So since then i have never change anything in the configuration.
Cannot confirm this.
We have some (three) 2011UiAS managing about 25 IPSEC site2site tunnels (talking to Cisco ASA, Cisco 3005 and RB2011s) and after upgrade to 6.12 they're running perfectly.
It even seems that IKE handshake is gotten faster.
Christopher Diedrich
MTCNA, MTCUME, MTCWE
Basel, Switzerland
Bremen, Germany

There are 10 types of people: Those who understand binary and those who don't.
There are two types of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
 
Clauu
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 205
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:27 pm
Location: RO

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 17, 2014 9:31 am

Good job devs team now with the latest update the usb power is much more stable :) I have almost 1 day uptime of a usb 3g modem where on <=6.11 it was a nightmare no more than 2hours of uptime
Ok so unfortunately happened again :( now it will last for ~ 1day and after that reset occurs again..
Having fun with RB850Gx2, RB2011UiAS-2HnD, RB260GSP, RB751U-2HnD, CRS112, RB3011UiAS, hAP ac, cAP ac and hAP ac². More others on the way :-)
 
User avatar
iossol
just joined
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 6:27 pm
Location: Nuremberg / Germany

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 17, 2014 12:41 pm

:(
RB2011UAS stops responding some hours after upgrade from 6.11 to 6.12.
The System is used as a l2tp/ipsec dialin Router with Radius.

The System is placed in a Colocation Center, I'm actually waiting for some Info or a powercycle from the Centers Support Staff.

The Router was pretty stable up to RouterOS 6.7, after that it becomes a nightmare.
 
User avatar
cdiedrich
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 905
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 2:03 pm
Location: Basel, Switzerland // Bremen, Germany
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 17, 2014 12:54 pm

Just a cosmetic one:

Bridge filters show up incompletely in Winbox.
Creating/editing rules works perfectly. But in the list view the Interface columns are empty.
When reopening a rule in Winbox the appropriate sections come up collapsed but when opening them, the interfaces are there.
Everything shows up correctly in console/telnet/ssh/winbox console.
Christopher Diedrich
MTCNA, MTCUME, MTCWE
Basel, Switzerland
Bremen, Germany

There are 10 types of people: Those who understand binary and those who don't.
There are two types of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
 
remojames
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:19 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 17, 2014 1:27 pm

I had problem with Kernel panic and after upgrade firmware to 3.13 everything is ok now
 
gotsprings
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 774
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 9:30 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 17, 2014 2:53 pm

Yup...

On vacation and clicked on Download and Upgrade 6.12 for my Home CRS.
It's off line now.

Guess I will get to try to fix this on Friday when I get home. Please put up a warning. AS it seems a few others have seen the same thing with CRS.
"It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so."
Mark Twain
 
User avatar
pcunite
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 945
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 5:13 am
Location: USA

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 17, 2014 2:55 pm

I had to reset to defaults and reconfigure, then no more crashing.
That is the secret to fixing many user level issues. The parsing engine is really to blame for most troubles.
 
User avatar
iossol
just joined
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 6:27 pm
Location: Nuremberg / Germany

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 17, 2014 3:31 pm

:(
RB2011UAS stops responding some hours after upgrade from 6.11 to 6.12.
The System is used as a l2tp/ipsec dialin Router with Radius.

The System is placed in a Colocation Center, I'm actually waiting for some Info or a powercycle from the Centers Support Staff.

The Router was pretty stable up to RouterOS 6.7, after that it becomes a nightmare.
Just a short update:
Touchpanel was responsive, but no packets on any ethernet port. Looks like the switch stops working.
After powercycle, normal access was possible.
Config reset is not possible, since the RB2011 is in an external Colocation Center which is 3 hours away from my office.
For now a backup 2011 with RouterOS 6.7 is in production and the other one has to wait for 6.13 or for my next visit.
 
User avatar
Aveyer
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 11:17 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 17, 2014 3:40 pm

I had to reset to defaults and reconfigure, then no more crashing.
That is the secret to fixing many user level issues. The parsing engine is really to blame for most troubles.
It's strange, there was no problem with the other 3 in production that were upgraded, just the one on my desk which was preconfigured for deployment to another site.

So it's like OSPF messed up on this one because OSPF didn't get to connect to the network.
 
brainy
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 149
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:08 pm
Location: Unterschleissheim, Germany
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 17, 2014 3:47 pm

Anyone tried DHCP server on VLAN with this ? Is all fine now ?
Is the DHCP server problem for vlans fixed?
what was the problem? I have a CCR with DHCP Servers on VLANs, it worked fine on v6.7 and it works now on v6.12
The problem was with dhcp server on vlan interface(s) on bonding-interface(s) giving wrong netmasks.
 
Zorro
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 676
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:43 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:30 pm

about winbox crashing - try import really messy/complex stuff into any part of config and it crash.
probably parser was slightly memory-limited to do some things.
for example importing updated pgl.yoyo.org adslist to blackhole advertisers or lists of red-flagged(botnet pandemic or persistently ran offensive payloads)segments of internet - can, due to lenght.
 
jondavy
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 11:14 pm
Location: Brasil

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 17, 2014 5:48 pm

all pppoe and vpls interfaces are disappeared , but still working,
was using version 6.11 CCR-1-1612G, now updated to version 6.12, and how it has all ok
 
kotsius
just joined
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 9:58 am

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 17, 2014 9:14 pm

SSTP problems still persist:

We have SSTP server-client interconnections between 6 MT routers, all of which share *exactly* the same settings. After upgrading them to v6.12, some pairs would connect without problems, others however would disconnect after roughly one minute, mostly returning a "negotiation timeout" on the server side. There was no obvious pattern, some pairings would work, others simply wouldn't. PPP profile encryption is set to "no", but "yes" failed just as well. Changing keepalive timeouts on both sides had no visible effect, nor had disabling certificate verification.

We are now back to v6.6, having already tried most in between versions...
 
ndbjorne
just joined
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:06 pm
Location: Italy

Re: v6.12 released

Fri Apr 18, 2014 12:14 am

SSTP problems still persist:

We have SSTP server-client interconnections between 6 MT routers, all of which share *exactly* the same settings. After upgrading them to v6.12, some pairs would connect without problems, others however would disconnect after roughly one minute, mostly returning a "negotiation timeout" on the server side. There was no obvious pattern, some pairings would work, others simply wouldn't. PPP profile encryption is set to "no", but "yes" failed just as well. Changing keepalive timeouts on both sides had no visible effect, nor had disabling certificate verification.

We are now back to v6.6, having already tried most in between versions...
6 MT routerboards connect to SSTP server, after upgrading them all to 6.12 connections continuosly reset after 2m.
...
22:45:09 sstp,ppp,info sstp-out1: connected 
22:47:08 sstp,ppp,info sstp-out1: terminating... - conn timeout 
22:47:08 sstp,ppp,info sstp-out1: disconnected 
22:47:08 sstp,ppp,info sstp-out1: initializing... 
22:47:08 sstp,ppp,info sstp-out1: connecting... 
22:47:09 sstp,ppp,info sstp-out1: authenticated 
22:47:10 sstp,ppp,info sstp-out1: connected 
22:49:09 sstp,ppp,info sstp-out1: terminating... - conn timeout 
22:49:09 sstp,ppp,info sstp-out1: disconnected 
22:49:09 sstp,ppp,info sstp-out1: initializing... 
22:49:09 sstp,ppp,info sstp-out1: connecting... 
22:49:10 sstp,ppp,info sstp-out1: authenticated 
22:49:11 sstp,ppp,info sstp-out1: connected
...
Downgraded server back to 6.11: tunnels now seem stable.

Bye
Andrea
 
stefan803
just joined
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 12:30 am

Re: v6.12 released

Fri Apr 18, 2014 12:29 am

Hi,

I can see the same here for 3 sstp links, always a reconnect after 2 minutes saying "terminating... - conn timeout" in the logs of the client.

A link from Windows to the router using sstp seems not to be reset after 2 minutes.
 
humppa
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 5:44 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Fri Apr 18, 2014 8:18 am

RB951G-2HnD
Too many records in Log:

XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX@wlan1: disconnected, group key exchange timeout
wlan1: data from unknown device XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX, sent deauth

where XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX exactly my device.
 
dtoffo
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:19 am

Re: v6.12 released

Fri Apr 18, 2014 9:09 am

OpenVPN server doesn't work! The same TLS failed error in log as it was in 6.11. Downgrade to 6.10
for me a 6.9 with ovpn server functioning, upgraded to 6.10 or 6.11 had TLS error, upgraded to 6.12 (with no configuration changes) works ok

d.
 
dtoffo
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:19 am

Re: v6.12 released

Fri Apr 18, 2014 9:12 am

What about CAPsMAN (wireless-fp package): is it still beta or production-stable?
What's new in CAPsMAN 6.12?
Anyone from Mikrotik support can give just a word about CAPsMAN ?

d.
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.12 released

Fri Apr 18, 2014 12:14 pm

What about CAPsMAN (wireless-fp package): is it still beta or production-stable?
Read:
Wireless test package which includes the new CAPsMAN feature (Controlled AP system manager).
Anyone from Mikrotik support can give just a word about CAPsMAN ?
Search:
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
tmorrison88
just joined
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2013 11:18 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:49 pm

There is still a bug in RouterOS 6.12 that was introduced in RouterOS 6.11 regarding bridge filter rules. I've found if you create bridge filter rules specifying an interface, the interface shown will go into hidden/minimized state in Winbox. The interface is still there and bridge filter is working but there is this hidden effect that is happening.

Create the bridge filter rule with bridge/interface specified. Double click on that same rule you had just created. There is a drop down arrow (menu field collapse/expand arrow) specifying the interface it will show as minimized, vs having that drop down arrow always maximized showing you what is applied on that rule.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
ncd
just joined
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 10:18 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Fri Apr 18, 2014 7:27 pm


I was running a 6.12rc and it was working fine. Upgraded to 6.12 release and it hung on reboot, and comes up with all ports disabled. I can login at the serial console but commands like
/interface print
just hang. Reset-configuration works (eventually) but putting my config back breaks it after a reboot.

I too am working on a reproducible config that breaks the CCR. I hope to be able to post something soon.
I am experiencing the very same problem. The switch seems to run fine with the default config, but as soon as I add some vlan features (ingress vlan translation and egress vlan translation) works for a few minutes and then hangs. It also keeps hanging at the boot, responds to the console but it doesn't execute "/print interface ethernet".

I'm working to generate a supout.rif.
I already send support.rif to support, waiting to anwser...
I've tried this a few times today with 6.12 and it's not just print in the interface section that will cause it to lock up, exporting config also causes the device to hard lock up.

Should add I started with a clean configuration and then applied the config bit by bit, the entire config was accepted without error but lockups occurred when printing out to confirm it had been interpreted.
Last edited by ncd on Fri Apr 18, 2014 9:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
rpingar
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 539
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 2:46 pm
Location: Italy

Re: v6.12 released

Fri Apr 18, 2014 8:14 pm

There is still a bug in RouterOS 6.12 that was introduced in RouterOS 6.11 regarding bridge filter rules. I've found if you create bridge filter rules specifying an interface, the interface shown will go into hidden/minimized state in Winbox. The interface is still there and bridge filter is working but there is this hidden effect that is happening.

Create the bridge filter rule with bridge/interface specified. Double click on that same rule you had just created. There is a drop down arrow (menu field collapse/expand arrow) specifying the interface it will show as minimized, vs having that drop down arrow always maximized showing you what is applied on that rule.
+1

regards
Ros
 
elmer
newbie
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:02 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Fri Apr 18, 2014 9:14 pm

RouterOS 6.x don`t have "/interface ethernet poe" command?
My RB from MUM Italy still looks like that ;)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.12 released

Fri Apr 18, 2014 10:53 pm

RouterOS 6.x don`t have "/interface ethernet poe" command?
My RB from MUM Italy still looks like that ;)
Elmer, devi andate in interface / ethernet / ether10 / PoE

ros code

[admin@MATRIX] /system package> print
Flags: X - disabled 
 #   NAME                     VERSION                    SCHEDULED              
 0   routeros-mipsbe          6.12                                              
 1   system                   6.12                                              
 2 X ipv6                     6.12                                              
 3   wireless                 6.12                                              
 4   hotspot                  6.12                                              
 5   dhcp                     6.12                                              
 6 X mpls                     6.12                                              
 7 X routing                  6.12                                              
 8   ppp                      6.12                                              
 9   security                 6.12                                              
10   advanced-tools           6.12                                              
11   user-manager             6.12                                              
12   ntp                      6.12
[admin@MATRIX] /system routerboard> print
       routerboard: yes
             model: RB951Ui-2HnD
     serial-number: [...]
  current-firmware: 3.14
  upgrade-firmware: 3.14
[admin@MATRIX] /interface ethernet poe> print
            ;;; PPPoE client
          name: ether5
       poe-out: auto-on
  poe-priority: 10
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
tkgit
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 59
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 8:32 am
Location: Dunedin, NZ
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Sat Apr 19, 2014 1:44 am

how about "random missing interface"
2014040766000072
 
janel
just joined
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 10:41 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Sat Apr 19, 2014 9:40 pm

I've tried this a few times today with 6.12 and it's not just print in the interface section that will cause it to lock up, exporting config also causes the device to hard lock up.
Should add I started with a clean configuration and then applied the config bit by bit, the entire config was accepted without error but lockups occurred when printing out to confirm it had been interpreted.
Same thing here, after upgrade the router is stuck at "Starting services" on the LCD and all the ports are disabled. Reset configuration, reboot, paste the whole config (I have tried to remove /interface ethernet switch egress-vlan-translation - the same) and everything works until the next reboot.

Downgraded to 6.11 which is at least stable if not secure. :(
That's on the CRS125-24G-1S.

Upgraded just fine on 951G-2HnD, 751G-2HnD and 951Ui-2HnD.
 
User avatar
armandfumal
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 125
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 5:50 pm
Location: Huldange,LUX
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Sat Apr 19, 2014 10:41 pm

DHCP on VLAN was also working on 6.11.. I am using it right now without problems. I reported that back in 6.11 released topic..
same for me DHCP on vlan is working for me...
Armand Fumal
________________________________________________________________
MikroTik & Ubiquity
 
rpingar
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 539
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 2:46 pm
Location: Italy

Re: v6.12 released

Sun Apr 20, 2014 12:54 am

Ticket#2014041966000282

pppoe client present into the list of eoip interface, and some new eoip interface disappear.
Seems a problem of mismatch interface id. Very weird bahavior.

regards
Ros
 
Dadon
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 9:39 am

Re: v6.12 released

Sun Apr 20, 2014 4:37 am

There is still a bug in RouterOS 6.12 that was introduced in RouterOS 6.11 regarding bridge filter rules. I've found if you create bridge filter rules specifying an interface, the interface shown will go into hidden/minimized state in Winbox. The interface is still there and bridge filter is working but there is this hidden effect that is happening.

Create the bridge filter rule with bridge/interface specified. Double click on that same rule you had just created. There is a drop down arrow (menu field collapse/expand arrow) specifying the interface it will show as minimized, vs having that drop down arrow always maximized showing you what is applied on that rule.
+1

regards
Ros
+1
 
telepro
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 63
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 7:50 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Sun Apr 20, 2014 4:41 am

SSTP problems still persist:

We have SSTP server-client interconnections between 6 MT routers, all of which share *exactly* the same settings. After upgrading them to v6.12, some pairs would connect without problems, others however would disconnect after roughly one minute, mostly returning a "negotiation timeout" on the server side. There was no obvious pattern, some pairings would work, others simply wouldn't. PPP profile encryption is set to "no", but "yes" failed just as well. Changing keepalive timeouts on both sides had no visible effect, nor had disabling certificate verification.

We are now back to v6.6, having already tried most in between versions...
Also experiencing same problem. In our environment: 50+ identical 951G, each acting as SSTP clients, and single 1100AHx2 as SSTP server. Have submitted a Ticket#2014031866000446 ago with Supout files from both client and server sides, logs from both clients and servers, and wireshark recordings. Some connections work for extended periods of time. Others will loop with ~ 2 minute connection, disconnect, the reconnect for ~ 2 minutes...

Have not found stable configuration with 6.5 or later.
 
infused
Member
Member
Posts: 305
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:33 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:32 am

Any issues with CCR reported on 6.12?
 
rpingar
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 539
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 2:46 pm
Location: Italy

Re: v6.12 released

Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:43 am

Any issues with CCR reported on 6.12?
Ticket#2014041966000282

pppoe client present into the list of eoip interface, and some new eoip interface disappear.
Seems a problem of mismatch interface id. Very weird bahavior.

regards
Ros
 
skibi82
newbie
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 7:09 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Sun Apr 20, 2014 12:36 pm

Super LACP has been added ond CRS and when it will be implemented protocol support xSTP [STP / RSTP / MSTP / ....]?

Of course, talking about the hardware switch
 
User avatar
omidkosari
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 616
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:18 pm
Location: Iran , Karaj
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Sun Apr 20, 2014 3:17 pm

CRS port leaking bug does not fixed :(
MTCNA , MTCRE, MTCWE, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
 
staslabs
newbie
Posts: 38
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 9:38 pm
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Sun Apr 20, 2014 9:32 pm

In 6.12 ver. is not stable work NSTREME from new wireless+capsman package.

After downgrade to 6.9 links work fine again.
 
evharten
newbie
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:20 am
Location: Capelle a/d IJssel, The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Mon Apr 21, 2014 6:18 am

When copy'ing an file from an NAS, the cpu peaks to 100% and stays there, why ? i do not use any firewall or other rules just basic switching.
It completely slows all traffic.

Supout.rif in Ticket#2014042166000116

EDIT: 100% usage is also present without traffic at all.
Last edited by evharten on Tue Apr 22, 2014 5:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
https://www.mikroshop.nl - The Dutch Mikrotik Store!
 
User avatar
MadEngineer
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 134
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 10:47 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: v6.12 released

Mon Apr 21, 2014 10:41 am

/log print shows current time (time of log in) as 07:xx:xx

/system clock shows time of 19:xx:xx

Timezone (pacific/auckland), GMT Offset (+12), SNTP Client and dates on newly created files are all correct. Checked with another Mikrotik device on an earlier release and it shows the log times as being correct. Anyone else got this?
MTCNA
 
elmer
newbie
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:02 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Mon Apr 21, 2014 1:50 pm

RouterOS 6.x don`t have "/interface ethernet poe" command?
My RB from MUM Italy still looks like that ;)
Elmer, devi andate in interface / ethernet / ether10 / PoE

ros code

[admin@MATRIX] /system package> print
Flags: X - disabled 
 #   NAME                     VERSION                    SCHEDULED              
 0   routeros-mipsbe          6.12                                              
 1   system                   6.12                                              
 2 X ipv6                     6.12                                              
 3   wireless                 6.12                                              
 4   hotspot                  6.12                                              
 5   dhcp                     6.12                                              
 6 X mpls                     6.12                                              
 7 X routing                  6.12                                              
 8   ppp                      6.12                                              
 9   security                 6.12                                              
10   advanced-tools           6.12                                              
11   user-manager             6.12                                              
12   ntp                      6.12
[admin@MATRIX] /system routerboard> print
       routerboard: yes
             model: RB951Ui-2HnD
     serial-number: [...]
  current-firmware: 3.14
  upgrade-firmware: 3.14
[admin@MATRIX] /interface ethernet poe> print
            ;;; PPPoE client
          name: ether5
       poe-out: auto-on
  poe-priority: 10
How about poe firmware upgrade, still showing 0.0 version...
 
mtmx80
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 11:12 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Mon Apr 21, 2014 5:36 pm

RB2011UAS issues after upgrade to v6.12:

- Dynamic routing protocols registered routes wrongly after first start. A simple reboot resolves this issue.
- Ports are flapping. There is a very short outage every few minutes. SNMP monitoring agents on servers sends tons of alerts. There is no RX/TX errors, but there are packet lost even on LAN. :?
- Inconsistent / bad auto negotiation. Router side see 1Gbps or 10Mbps Half, server runs on 100Mbps FD. After disabling/enabling ports change advertised rates, then restore to default (select all) it looks normally on both side. - (1Gbps FD)
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.12 released

Mon Apr 21, 2014 6:45 pm

How about poe firmware upgrade, still showing 0.0 version...
From 6.7 PoE firmware is bundled on RouterOS, you not need more to update PoE firmware....


BUT


PoE firmware can be upgraded only on RB750UP and on OmniTIK UPA-5HnD (both max 1A for each port, but 2A max total, all port monitorable)
RB2011 "i" variants and RB951Ui-2HnD have only simple PoE out (500mA max not monitorable).
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
BanjoJay
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2014 2:18 am

Re: v6.12 released

Mon Apr 21, 2014 9:39 pm

I have notice some problems with PPPoE. It seems to be terminating the link alot. I just got my CCR and have only try using 6.12 so far. Is there a downgrade version that works better? Right now unless I can get the link stable I am going to have to pull it out of my network. My old netgear router works fine so it does not seem to be on my ISP side of things. Any help would be great!
I have include my config so far. I do not have any firewall rules yet since I am just now trying to bring it up.

/interface bridge
add admin-mac=D4:CA:6D:FA:72:E1 auto-mac=no l2mtu=1588 name=bridge-local

/interface wireless
set [ find default-name=wlan1 ] band=2ghz-b/g/n channel-width=\
20/40mhz-ht-above disabled=no distance=indoors hide-ssid=yes l2mtu=2290 \
mode=ap-bridge ssid=**** wireless-protocol=802.11

/interface wireless security-profiles
set [ find default=yes ] authentication-types=wpa-psk,wpa2-psk mode=\
dynamic-keys wpa-pre-shared-key=****** wpa2-pre-shared-key=*****

/ip pool
add name=dhcp ranges=192.168.88.50-192.168.88.254

/ip dhcp-server
add address-pool=dhcp disabled=no interface=bridge-local lease-time=10m name= default

/interface pppoe-client
add ac-name="" add-default-route=yes allow=pap,chap,mschap1,mschap2 \
default-route-distance=1 dial-on-demand=no disabled=no interface=\
ether1-gateway keepalive-timeout=60 max-mru=1480 max-mtu=1480 mrru=\
disabled name=pppoe-out1 password=******* profile=default service-name="" \
use-peer-dns=yes user=******

/interface bridge port
add bridge=bridge-local interface=ether2-master-local
add bridge=bridge-local interface=wlan1

/interface bridge settings
set use-ip-firewall=yes use-ip-firewall-for-pppoe=yes

/ip address
add address=192.168.88.1/24 comment="default configuration" interface=\
ether2-master-local network=192.168.88.0

/ip dhcp-server network
add address=192.168.88.0/24 comment="default configuration" dns-server=192.168.88.1 gateway=192.168.88.1

/ip firewall nat
add action=masquerade chain=srcnat comment="default configuration" out-interface=pppoe-out1
 
pitr
just joined
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:14 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Mon Apr 21, 2014 10:01 pm

For me the PPTP server broke in 6.12. Nothing in the logging after "TCP connection".
Downgraded to 6.10, since it's the last version where both PPTP and OpenVPN work.
 
estdata
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 99
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 9:05 pm
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 22, 2014 7:31 am

Please, do the time, I upgrading 6.12, 6.10 in addition before was it and then forget about it, the community began believing it. so mince IPTV. thing igmp proxy. And no longer can also ssh port forwarding does not work, do the thing when the redirect to the local ip address, if you want from the outside in
don't forget to give me karma if got help
....
 
User avatar
bysard
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 295
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 2:53 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 22, 2014 8:22 am

Still using version 5.26. I think I will skip RoS 6 all together, because this is ridicilous. Normis, you need another list of bugs, should we name a few?
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8308
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:20 pm

Normis, you need another list of bugs, should we name a few?
sure! don't keep silence!
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24205
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:22 pm

Please make sure you open a new ticket in support@mikrotik.com for each issue, this will guarantee that we check them out and fix them as well. Forum is for user discussions, and things can get lost here (no issue tracking)
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
jarda
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 7602
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:46 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:28 pm

Why mikrotik cannot keep official buglist on their webpage with report date and expected solution version? Also the improvement list and expected delivery version would be good. It should be centalized so everyone could know what is going on so we can plan our own actions.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24205
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:31 pm

Why mikrotik cannot keep official buglist on their webpage with report date and expected solution version? Also the improvement list and expected delivery version would be good. It should be centalized so everyone could know what is going on so we can plan our own actions.
Somebody needs to verify these reports first.
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
jarda
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 7602
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:46 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:38 pm

Of course. Therefore it should be only in your hands. But actualized for us to let us know.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24205
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:39 pm

Of course. Therefore it should be only in your hands. But actualized for us to let us know.
We are thinking of some solution for this, it has been requested before.
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
npero
Member
Member
Posts: 316
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:59 pm
Location: Serbia

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:57 pm

Normis what about Ticket#2014032466000827 almost one month pass no answer.
 
Zito
just joined
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 11:41 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 22, 2014 1:01 pm

RB2011UAS issues after upgrade to v6.12:
- Ports are flapping. There is a very short outage every few minutes. SNMP monitoring agents on servers sends tons of alerts. There is no RX/TX errors, but there are packet lost even on LAN.
100mbit ports flaps when CPU get 100% load, try to disable some unused features. I disable l7-filter from my firewall rules and ports are stable.
 
wiyat
newbie
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:38 pm
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 22, 2014 1:21 pm

Hi
Mikrotik professional

I dont know if you have this problem or not but I post here with the objetive that you test on your network and if you have the same problem please report with Mikrotik.

Situation:
The btest to PPPoE Client Interface from some CCR with Firmware different I get less MB
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
vihai
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 5:03 am

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 22, 2014 1:48 pm

Ticket#2014042266000516

I've just upgraded a VPN concentrator to 6.12 and discovered that the intermediate certificate is not being sent anymore.

Previously (6.11) the root certificate was also incorrectly sent, but ignored by the clients, now neither is sent, thus breaking client connections.


Here is the s_client output for 6.11:

vihai@seviolab:~$ openssl s_client -connect vpn1dev.sevio.it:443
CONNECTED(00000003)
depth=2 C = IL, O = StartCom Ltd., OU = Secure Digital Certificate Signing, CN = StartCom Certification Authority
verify error:num=19:self signed certificate in certificate chain
verify return:0
---
Certificate chain
 0 s:/description=O52Gm9gv4K7FoF9c/C=IT/ST=Monza Brianza/L=Seveso/O=Utility Line Italia S.R.L./CN=*.sevio.it/emailAddress=hostmaster@sevio.it
   i:/C=IL/O=StartCom Ltd./OU=Secure Digital Certificate Signing/CN=StartCom Class 2 Primary Intermediate Server CA
 1 s:/C=IL/O=StartCom Ltd./OU=Secure Digital Certificate Signing/CN=StartCom Class 2 Primary Intermediate Server CA
   i:/C=IL/O=StartCom Ltd./OU=Secure Digital Certificate Signing/CN=StartCom Certification Authority
 2 s:/C=IL/O=StartCom Ltd./OU=Secure Digital Certificate Signing/CN=StartCom Certification Authority
   i:/C=IL/O=StartCom Ltd./OU=Secure Digital Certificate Signing/CN=StartCom Certification Authority
---

Here is the s_client output for 6.12:
vihai@seviolab:~$ openssl s_client -connect vpn1dev.sevio.it:443
CONNECTED(00000003)
depth=0 description = O52Gm9gv4K7FoF9c, C = IT, ST = Monza Brianza, L = Seveso, O = Utility Line Italia S.R.L., CN = *.sevio.it, emailAddress = hostmaster@sevio.it
verify error:num=20:unable to get local issuer certificate
verify return:1
depth=0 description = O52Gm9gv4K7FoF9c, C = IT, ST = Monza Brianza, L = Seveso, O = Utility Line Italia S.R.L., CN = *.sevio.it, emailAddress = hostmaster@sevio.it
verify error:num=27:certificate not trusted
verify return:1
depth=0 description = O52Gm9gv4K7FoF9c, C = IT, ST = Monza Brianza, L = Seveso, O = Utility Line Italia S.R.L., CN = *.sevio.it, emailAddress = hostmaster@sevio.it
verify error:num=21:unable to verify the first certificate
verify return:1
---
Certificate chain
 0 s:/description=O52Gm9gv4K7FoF9c/C=IT/ST=Monza Brianza/L=Seveso/O=Utility Line Italia S.R.L./CN=*.sevio.it/emailAddress=hostmaster@sevio.it
   i:/C=IL/O=StartCom Ltd./OU=Secure Digital Certificate Signing/CN=StartCom Class 2 Primary Intermediate Server CA
---
 
vihai
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 5:03 am

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 22, 2014 1:50 pm

Ticket#2014042266000552

I have a very basic configuration involving VRFs:
/ip address
add address=192.168.1.1/24 interface=ether2 network=192.168.1.0
/ip dhcp-client
add add-default-route=no dhcp-options=hostname,clientid disabled=no \
    interface=ether1
/ip route
add distance=1 gateway=192.168.1.1 scope=10
/ip route vrf
add interfaces=ether2 routing-mark=VRF
The interface with DHCP client receives an address in the 192.168.1.0/24 network which is perfectly legal.

If, however, it gets such an address major issues arise:

Packets that whould be going to the default route (in the main table) are dropped as if the default is missing.

[admin@BACO] > ping 8.8.8.8
HOST                             SIZE TTL TIME  STATUS
                                                no route to host
                                                no route to host
    sent=2 received=0 packet-loss=100%

[admin@BACO] > /ip route print
Flags: X - disabled, A - active, D - dynamic,
C - connect, S - static, r - rip, b - bgp, o - ospf, m - mme,
B - blackhole, U - unreachable, P - prohibit
 #      DST-ADDRESS        PREF-SRC        GATEWAY            DISTANCE
 0 ADC  192.168.1.0/24     192.168.1.1     ether2                    0
 1 ADC  192.168.1.0/24     192.168.1.143   ether1                    0
Adding an explicit /32 to 8.8.8.8 does not help.
 
vihai
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 5:03 am

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 22, 2014 2:12 pm

Also... minor issue not worth opening a ticket.... downgrading from 6.12 to 6.11 removes server certificate from OpenVPN server
 
vihai
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 5:03 am

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 22, 2014 2:27 pm

Also.... 6.12, removing an intermediate/CA certificate has no effect, it is still sent to the client until reboot.
 
iqt
just joined
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri Jun 07, 2013 11:04 am

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 22, 2014 3:00 pm

What happened to /certificate sign-ca ... in 6.12?
 
samsung172
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1186
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 3:45 am
Location: Østfold - Norway
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 22, 2014 7:22 pm

Ticket#2014042266000552

I have a very basic configuration involving VRFs:
/ip address
add address=192.168.1.1/24 interface=ether2 network=192.168.1.0
/ip dhcp-client
add add-default-route=no dhcp-options=hostname,clientid disabled=no \
    interface=ether1
/ip route
add distance=1 gateway=192.168.1.1 scope=10
/ip route vrf
add interfaces=ether2 routing-mark=VRF
The interface with DHCP client receives an address in the 192.168.1.0/24 network which is perfectly legal.

If, however, it gets such an address major issues arise:

Packets that whould be going to the default route (in the main table) are dropped as if the default is missing.

[admin@BACO] > ping 8.8.8.8
HOST                             SIZE TTL TIME  STATUS
                                                no route to host
                                                no route to host
    sent=2 received=0 packet-loss=100%

[admin@BACO] > /ip route print
Flags: X - disabled, A - active, D - dynamic,
C - connect, S - static, r - rip, b - bgp, o - ospf, m - mme,
B - blackhole, U - unreachable, P - prohibit
 #      DST-ADDRESS        PREF-SRC        GATEWAY            DISTANCE
 0 ADC  192.168.1.0/24     192.168.1.1     ether2                    0
 1 ADC  192.168.1.0/24     192.168.1.143   ether1                    0
Adding an explicit /32 to 8.8.8.8 does not help.

add a dst=0.0.0.0/0 to Your route add? :)

You are missing default GW, and cannot Reach anyting else than Your 192 net.
 
vihai
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 5:03 am

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 22, 2014 7:28 pm

Ticket#2014042266000981

I setup a SSTP client connecting to a server with a properly signed wildcard certificate (CN=*.sevio.it).

The server is correctly sending the certificates chain.

The client is configured to use the server's hostname vpn1dev.sevio.it.


The client connects, the server's certificate is verified successfully, however the connection is dropped and the log reads:



18:17:37 sstp,info vpn3: initializing...
18:17:37 sstp,info vpn3: connecting...
18:17:38 sstp,info vpn3: terminating... - server's IP address does not match certificate
18:17:38 sstp,info vpn3: disconnected
 
vihai
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 5:03 am

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 22, 2014 8:01 pm

add a dst=0.0.0.0/0 to Your route add? :)

You are missing default GW, and cannot Reach anyting else than Your 192 net.
No, I'm not missing it, I forgot to re-enable the DHCP client default route after trying to add a static default route. The issue remains.
[admin@BACO] > /ip route print
Flags: X - disabled, A - active, D - dynamic, 
C - connect, S - static, r - rip, b - bgp, o - ospf, m - mme, 
B - blackhole, U - unreachable, P - prohibit 
 #      DST-ADDRESS        PREF-SRC        GATEWAY            DISTANCE
 0  DC  192.168.1.0/24     192.168.1.1     ether2                  255
 1 ADS  0.0.0.0/0                          192.168.1.1               0
 2 ADC  192.168.1.0/24     192.168.1.143   ether1                    0

[admin@BACO] > ping 8.8.8.8   
HOST                                     SIZE TTL TIME  STATUS                 
                                                        no route to host       
                                                        no route to host     
 
samsung172
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1186
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 3:45 am
Location: Østfold - Norway
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:16 pm

add a dst=0.0.0.0/0 to Your route add? :)

You are missing default GW, and cannot Reach anyting else than Your 192 net.
No, I'm not missing it, I forgot to re-enable the DHCP client default route after trying to add a static default route. The issue remains.
[admin@BACO] > /ip route print
Flags: X - disabled, A - active, D - dynamic, 
C - connect, S - static, r - rip, b - bgp, o - ospf, m - mme, 
B - blackhole, U - unreachable, P - prohibit 
 #      DST-ADDRESS        PREF-SRC        GATEWAY            DISTANCE
 0  DC  192.168.1.0/24     192.168.1.1     ether2                  255
 1 ADS  0.0.0.0/0                          192.168.1.1               0
 2 ADC  192.168.1.0/24     192.168.1.143   ether1                    0

[admin@BACO] > ping 8.8.8.8   
HOST                                     SIZE TTL TIME  STATUS                 
                                                        no route to host       
                                                        no route to host     
does yor default Routing table or Your vrf tabel have the Gateway?
 
User avatar
congo
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:40 am
Location: Hungary

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:24 pm

On my home router (RB951G) v6.12 is crashing every few days, since installed.
I cannot recommend to use it in production.
 
stefan803
just joined
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 12:30 am

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 23, 2014 12:03 am

SSTP problems still persist:

We have SSTP server-client interconnections between 6 MT routers, all of which share *exactly* the same settings. After upgrading them to v6.12, some pairs would connect without problems, others however would disconnect after roughly one minute, mostly returning a "negotiation timeout" on the server side. [...]
Just noticed two things:
a) For me with 6.12 it started to drop sstp-connections every 2 minutes... then at some point it stopped this and worked... whyever
b) now I noticed when setting the "keepalive-timeout" on the client to same value the connection starts reconnecting every "keepalive-timeout" x 2, so setting the keepalive timeout to 10 for example it starts to reconnect every 20 seconds
 
vihai
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 5:03 am

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 23, 2014 12:10 am

does yor default Routing table or Your vrf tabel have the Gateway?
The defaul route is installed in the main table by the DHCP client. A static route does the same, however.

The VRF is pretty empty, just an interface with a single static IP address.


BTW, if I disable the interface in the VRF and release the DHCP acquired address it, sometimes, start working. If I boot with the interface in the VRF altready disable and enable it afterwise it works.

It's clearly a bug.
 
jondavy
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 11:14 pm
Location: Brasil

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 23, 2014 12:29 am

I scheduled a script I /system reboot at dawn to uninstall a package that is not used "wireless" in the morning just gone all pppoe-outs, vpls and bridges and all interfaces again be named as factories ether1 ... ether13 was using version 6.12 on a RB1100AH​​, then went back to version 5.26 that this seemingly more stable...
 
tkgit
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 59
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 8:32 am
Location: Dunedin, NZ
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 23, 2014 12:58 am

I scheduled a script I /system reboot at dawn to uninstall a package that is not used "wireless" in the morning just gone all pppoe-outs, vpls and bridges and all interfaces again be named as factories ether1 ... ether13 was using version 6.12 on a RB1100AH​​, then went back to version 5.26 that this seemingly more stable...
do you use IGMP proxy or PIM?
 
User avatar
thedoc
just joined
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 12:51 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 23, 2014 1:07 am

b) now I noticed when setting the "keepalive-timeout" on the client to same value the connection starts reconnecting every "keepalive-timeout" x 2, so setting the keepalive timeout to 10 for example it starts to reconnect every 20 seconds
Same problem here with one connection. 3 x the timeout of the client side disconnect the sstp tunnel.
Strange thing is that many (40 pcs) SSTP tunnels keep on running perfect at same system
Server is 6.12
Clients are always 5.x version and never 6.x
 
jondavy
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 11:14 pm
Location: Brasil

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 23, 2014 2:34 am

I scheduled a script I /system reboot at dawn to uninstall a package that is not used "wireless" in the morning just gone all pppoe-outs, vpls and bridges and all interfaces again be named as factories ether1 ... ether13 was using version 6.12 on a RB1100AH​​, then went back to version 5.26 that this seemingly more stable...
do you use IGMP proxy or PIM?
no, not yet used pim igmp proxy or, more future we intend to use, had a similar problem with our main router a CCR, which also disappeared all pppoe clients and vpls interfaces.
 
samsung172
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1186
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 3:45 am
Location: Østfold - Norway
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:16 am

does yor default Routing table or Your vrf tabel have the Gateway?
The defaul route is installed in the main table by the DHCP client. A static route does the same, however.

The VRF is pretty empty, just an interface with a single static IP address.


BTW, if I disable the interface in the VRF and release the DHCP acquired address it, sometimes, start working. If I boot with the interface in the VRF altready disable and enable it afterwise it works.

It's clearly a bug.
Well. i still cant tell the problem. unless you force the vrf to "leak" to main table- it should not work trough Your default Gateway. - It should be total separate and just Reach it own routes.
 
fievel
just joined
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2014 9:48 am

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 23, 2014 11:29 am

I can confirm that the issue with openvpn server with option "Require client certificate" not working anymore (bug found in 6.11) (http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=83203) is fixed in version 6.12 BUT you have to delete and re-import your certificates.
 
User avatar
NathanA
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 798
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 9:01 am

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 24, 2014 8:47 am

In 6.12 ver. is not stable work NSTREME from new wireless+capsman package.

After downgrade to 6.9 links work fine again.
Why did you downgrade? In 6.12, the wireless-fp/CAPsMAN package is completely optional. In fact, it's not even the default. Even if you install it, you can always go back to the old wireless package without downgrading the whole OS.

-- Nathan
 
uldis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 3425
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 2:55 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:12 am

Any issues with CCR reported on 6.12?
Ticket#2014041966000282

pppoe client present into the list of eoip interface, and some new eoip interface disappear.
Seems a problem of mismatch interface id. Very weird bahavior.

regards
Ros
This problem should be fixed in RotuterOS v6.13. You can get links to the development version from the Mikrotik account server.
 
uldis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 3425
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 2:55 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:22 am

In 6.12 ver. is not stable work NSTREME from new wireless+capsman package.

After downgrade to 6.9 links work fine again.
This problem is fixed in the newer RouterOS test builds RouterOS v6.13rc7 - you can get it from the development section in your Mikrotik Account server.
 
McTedson
newbie
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:04 pm
Location: .ro

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 24, 2014 1:38 pm

Running some IPIP/IPSEC tunnels between some sites with RIP over them.
Routing tables show up ok on each router/site, but no traffic goes over the tunnels...
Funny thing is the routers do show up on IP/Neighbours, so MDP seems to be working between therm, but nothing else works.
Downgrading to 6.11 gets it working again.
 
User avatar
afink
just joined
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 7:16 pm
Location: Basel & Reykjavik
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 24, 2014 4:59 pm

OSPFv3 for IPv6 still heavily broken and totally unusable if you have two or more ethernet between two routers. [Ticket#2013121266000031]
 
Clauu
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 205
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:27 pm
Location: RO

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 24, 2014 5:12 pm

rb2011 with latest 6.12, since yesterday i have high cpu usage, looked into tools-profile and 'dns' is eating 50% cpu.. wth is this?
From where i can restart/reset that service since i don't want to reboot the whole router just for that..?
Having fun with RB850Gx2, RB2011UiAS-2HnD, RB260GSP, RB751U-2HnD, CRS112, RB3011UiAS, hAP ac, cAP ac and hAP ac². More others on the way :-)
 
jarda
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 7602
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:46 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 24, 2014 5:19 pm

Probably publicly opened dns service under attack. Search the forum first.
 
w0lt
Member
Member
Posts: 484
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 2:12 pm
Location: Minnesota USA

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 24, 2014 5:38 pm

On my home router (RB951G) v6.12 is crashing every few days, since installed.
I cannot recommend to use it in production.
I've found, at times, I needed to netinstall an upgrade after it appears unstable but not all devices.
Can't explain why, but it seemed to help.

With that in mind, I've been running v6.12 on a several RB2011's, RB951's, RB1100AHx2, without any major issues and no crashes.
I've also upgraded all the boot firmware to each devices current version.

Not sure if I should cross my fingers or not. 8)

-tp
MTCNA - 2011

" The Bitterness of Poor Quality Remains Long After the Sweetness of Low Price is Forgotten "

Image
 
sash555
just joined
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 11:28 am

Re: v6.12 released

Thu Apr 24, 2014 7:59 pm

There is still a bug in RouterOS 6.12 that was introduced in RouterOS 6.11 regarding bridge filter rules. I've found if you create bridge filter rules specifying an interface, the interface shown will go into hidden/minimized state in Winbox. The interface is still there and bridge filter is working but there is this hidden effect that is happening.

Create the bridge filter rule with bridge/interface specified. Double click on that same rule you had just created. There is a drop down arrow (menu field collapse/expand arrow) specifying the interface it will show as minimized, vs having that drop down arrow always maximized showing you what is applied on that rule.
+1
 
visalink
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 1:42 am

Re: v6.12 released

Fri Apr 25, 2014 3:30 am

There is still a bug in RouterOS 6.12 that was introduced in RouterOS 6.11 regarding bridge filter rules. I've found if you create bridge filter rules specifying an interface, the interface shown will go into hidden/minimized state in Winbox. The interface is still there and bridge filter is working but there is this hidden effect that is happening.

Create the bridge filter rule with bridge/interface specified. Double click on that same rule you had just created. There is a drop down arrow (menu field collapse/expand arrow) specifying the interface it will show as minimized, vs having that drop down arrow always maximized showing you what is applied on that rule.
+1
What Mikrotik said about it:

Hello,

thank you for writing to us. We will resolve this issue in future releases of
RouterOS. As this is only graphical bug it is of low priority.

Regards,
Janis Krumins

Ticket#2014032766000581
 
infused
Member
Member
Posts: 305
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:33 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Fri Apr 25, 2014 6:46 am

RB2011UAS issues after upgrade to v6.12:

- Dynamic routing protocols registered routes wrongly after first start. A simple reboot resolves this issue.
- Ports are flapping. There is a very short outage every few minutes. SNMP monitoring agents on servers sends tons of alerts. There is no RX/TX errors, but there are packet lost even on LAN. :?
- Inconsistent / bad auto negotiation. Router side see 1Gbps or 10Mbps Half, server runs on 100Mbps FD. After disabling/enabling ports change advertised rates, then restore to default (select all) it looks normally on both side. - (1Gbps FD)
I run this router too.

I don't see port flapping.
Also, I had auto negotiation issues as well. I replaced my network cables with better ones and they seem to negotiate now at 1gbps on all links.
 
kez
newbie
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:13 am

Re: v6.12 released

Fri Apr 25, 2014 5:42 pm

Hello guys,
can I use fast-path on VLANs on my mips based RBs with 6.12?
I guess there is no VLAN fast-path handler available(yet, I hope...).
Cheers
 
mtandrew
just joined
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 8:54 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:04 pm

we lost complete vrrp config with 6.12 upgrade, it's simply gone.
also one router didn't boot at all, investigating.

so far crapiest upgrade ever.
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.12 released

Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:43 pm

Primary BUG: Webfig created script or schedule do not have ftp, winbox, api rights and are impossible to set that rights on Webfig

Secondary BUG: Winbox do not have the possibility to change ftp, winbox, api rights on script or schedule

VERSION AFFECTED: ALL VERSION OF ROUTEROS. Included last 6.13rc7

When one script are created on Winbox or on CLI, the default right applied are:
ftp,reboot,read,write,policy,test,winbox,password,sniff,sensitive,api

But when the script are created by webfig, the only right can be applied are:
reboot,read,write,policy,test,password,sniff,sensitive
MISSING ftp,winbox,api

Without ftp right some command like "/export file=filename;" are not doable on script / schedule created with WebFig.

Walkthrought: obviously using the CLI you can set the missing rights.

When I have time I open a Ticket for this.
But is clear what is the problem, without any other investigation.
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
thanga005
just joined
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 2:09 pm

Issue Updating My GROOVE

Sat Apr 26, 2014 6:49 am

Hi Guys,
I have been using mikrotik products for the last 6 months, since the day i started working in ISP.
It was really great to work with mikrotik RouterOS, From the first day i learned to update the version and firmware and so,
But just yesterday i bought 2 Groove 52HPn for a PtP Link, i made the connection between them as usually and they were working fine, the problem is it has license level 3 and shows upgradable to V7.x, it came with the version 5.25ROS and in download page it shows only 5.26version and it gut upgraded to 5.26, but i cannot upgrade to 6.x, i tried dragging the lastest packages and also netinstall too but no use,

any idea why it shows only 5.26 as latest version?

and any solution to update to ver 6x?

Thank you,
 
acung
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 5:57 pm
Location: Jakarta

Re: v6.12 released

Sat Apr 26, 2014 7:13 am

BUG: Enable ipv6 on rb751u-2hnd, reboot, then suddenly wlan interface disabled and all wireless configuration reset to default itself.
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.12 released

Sat Apr 26, 2014 12:39 pm

BUG: Enable ipv6 on rb751u-2hnd, reboot, then suddenly wlan interface disabled and all wireless configuration reset to default itself.
You must be more specific.
RouterOS version? BIOS? How to replicate?

You reach to replicate the problem?

If you can not replicate problem, do not expect any fix.
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
tkgit
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 59
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 8:32 am
Location: Dunedin, NZ
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Sun Apr 27, 2014 3:21 am

BUG: Enable ipv6 on rb751u-2hnd, reboot, then suddenly wlan interface disabled and all wireless configuration reset to default itself.
do you use tunnel broker?
same case with me, process suddenly rise to 100%, then some interface (usually bridge,mesh,vlan) missing, disable IPv6 package solve this problem
 
acung
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 5:57 pm
Location: Jakarta

Re: v6.12 released

Mon Apr 28, 2014 6:36 am

BUG: Enable ipv6 on rb751u-2hnd, reboot, then suddenly wlan interface disabled and all wireless configuration reset to default itself.
do you use tunnel broker?
same case with me, process suddenly rise to 100%, then some interface (usually bridge,mesh,vlan) missing, disable IPv6 package solve this problem
Not doing anything yet, just enable ipv6 package then reboot, then wlan interface disable by itself and the config reset to default.
Solve it by enable the wlan interface and reconfigure it.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24205
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.12 released

Mon Apr 28, 2014 10:18 am

Primary BUG: Webfig created script or schedule do not have ftp, winbox, api rights and are impossible to set that rights on Webfig.
Thanks, missing checkboxes noted.
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
MarcusW
just joined
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 11:02 am

Re: v6.12 released

Mon Apr 28, 2014 6:13 pm

When using the binary backup format; why is the MAC-addresses of the interfaces saved and used when restoring?!? (They are not changed from the default ones in the MT were the backup was taken.)

This was not the case with 5.x versions... which I think was the right behavior.
Last edited by MarcusW on Mon Apr 28, 2014 6:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5934
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Mon Apr 28, 2014 6:16 pm

Mac addresses were always saved in backups, with v5.x, too.
 
MarcusW
just joined
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 11:02 am

Re: v6.12 released

Mon Apr 28, 2014 6:27 pm

Mac addresses were always saved in backups, with v5.x, too.
Well, yes they are saved but they where NOT restored in 5.x. Why has this changed?
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5934
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Mon Apr 28, 2014 6:30 pm

Were saved and restored always.
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8308
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: Issue Updating My GROOVE

Mon Apr 28, 2014 7:18 pm

i cannot upgrade to 6.x, i tried dragging the lastest packages and also netinstall too but no use,

any idea why it shows only 5.26 as latest version?

and any solution to update to ver 6x?
the reason is in Log after reboot

5.26 is the latest in version checking because you have to upgrade to v6 manually
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
lunchboxrts
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 144
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 6:40 am
Location: United States

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 29, 2014 2:34 am

CRS125-24G-1S

Massive port flapping on CRS125 on latest 6.12 and 6.13rc7. Email sent with supout to support.
jan/02/1970 00:00:15 interface,info ether2 link up (speed 100M, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:16 interface,info ether1 link up (speed 10M, half duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:19 interface,info ether2 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:20 interface,info ether1 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:24 interface,info ether2 link up (speed 100M, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:25 interface,info ether1 link up (speed 10M, half duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:29 interface,info ether4 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:33 interface,info ether8 link up (speed 100M, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:34 interface,info ether4 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:37 interface,info ether4 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:38 interface,info ether4 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:41 interface,info ether4 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:44 interface,info ether4 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:45 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:45 interface,info ether8 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:46 interface,info ether8 link up (speed 100M, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:47 interface,info ether4 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:47 interface,info ether8 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:49 interface,info ether8 link up (speed 100M, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:52 interface,info ether10 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:53 interface,info ether10 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:56 interface,info ether10 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:57 interface,info ether10 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:57 interface,info ether12 link up (speed 100M, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:59 interface,info ether4 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:59 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:01:00 interface,info ether10 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:01:01 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:01:01 interface,info ether10 link down
jan/02/1970 00:01:02 interface,info ether4 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:01:03 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:01:04 interface,info ether10 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:01:07 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:01:10 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:01:13 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:01:46 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:01:49 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:01:59 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:02:02 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:02:03 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:02:06 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:02:26 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:02:28 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:02:34 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:02:39 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:02:40 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:02:43 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:02:44 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:02:50 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:06:05 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:06:08 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:10:45 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:10:48 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:17:34 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:17:37 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:19:35 interface,info ether10 link down
jan/02/1970 00:19:37 interface,info ether10 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:19:45 interface,info ether10 link down
jan/02/1970 00:19:47 interface,info ether10 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
 
MarcusW
just joined
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 11:02 am

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 29, 2014 10:16 am

Were saved and restored always.
Listen to me! They where NOT saved and restored always.

I have now taken a backup on an empty router with default MAC. Restoring this backup on a router with version 5.21 does nothing with the MAC-addresses in that router. Restoring this backup on a router with version 6.12 does change the MAC-addresses to the ones in the backup.

My question now is, once again; Why has this changed? Shouldn't the MAC:s be transfered ONLY when they where changed in the router were the backup was created?
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24205
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 29, 2014 10:48 am

Sorry marcus, apparently those routers are different in some way, because I also can verify that they are saved and restored in v5 also.

This is one of the reasons to use "export" file instead of backup
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
MarcusW
just joined
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 11:02 am

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 29, 2014 11:05 am

Sorry marcus, apparently those routers are different in some way, because I also can verify that they are saved and restored in v5 also.

This is one of the reasons to use "export" file instead of backup

Okay, but the tests I have done is on the same router, going back and forth with the versions and restore configuration from the same backup and for me I always get the MAC:s when using 6.12 and never with 5.21. We have also produced a lot of routers with 5.21 this way...

We don't use export because we haven't, amoung other things, found a way to also include users in the export file.. (In production it's also better it they don't need to go into the console...) We will try the export function again and then add users and so on to that file.
 
User avatar
chrone
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 81
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 7:16 am
Location: planet earth

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 29, 2014 3:57 pm

BUG: Tx and Rx Flow Control settings always get reset on reboot on RB450 ROS v6.12 with firmware v3.10.

I tested on 2 RB450s to enable the Tx and Rx Flow Control in Interface > Ethernet with no luck sticking the setting on reboot. :)
everytime i get ahead, i feel more dead.
 
acung
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 5:57 pm
Location: Jakarta

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 29, 2014 4:30 pm

CRS125-24G-1S

Massive port flapping on CRS125 on latest 6.12 and 6.13rc7. Email sent with supout to support.
jan/02/1970 00:00:15 interface,info ether2 link up (speed 100M, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:16 interface,info ether1 link up (speed 10M, half duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:19 interface,info ether2 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:20 interface,info ether1 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:24 interface,info ether2 link up (speed 100M, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:25 interface,info ether1 link up (speed 10M, half duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:29 interface,info ether4 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:33 interface,info ether8 link up (speed 100M, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:34 interface,info ether4 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:37 interface,info ether4 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:38 interface,info ether4 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:41 interface,info ether4 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:44 interface,info ether4 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:45 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:45 interface,info ether8 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:46 interface,info ether8 link up (speed 100M, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:47 interface,info ether4 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:47 interface,info ether8 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:49 interface,info ether8 link up (speed 100M, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:52 interface,info ether10 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:53 interface,info ether10 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:56 interface,info ether10 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:57 interface,info ether10 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:57 interface,info ether12 link up (speed 100M, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:59 interface,info ether4 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:59 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:01:00 interface,info ether10 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:01:01 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:01:01 interface,info ether10 link down
jan/02/1970 00:01:02 interface,info ether4 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:01:03 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:01:04 interface,info ether10 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:01:07 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:01:10 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:01:13 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:01:46 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:01:49 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:01:59 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:02:02 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:02:03 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:02:06 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:02:26 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:02:28 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:02:34 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:02:39 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:02:40 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:02:43 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:02:44 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:02:50 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:06:05 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:06:08 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:10:45 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:10:48 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:17:34 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:17:37 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:19:35 interface,info ether10 link down
jan/02/1970 00:19:37 interface,info ether10 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:19:45 interface,info ether10 link down
jan/02/1970 00:19:47 interface,info ether10 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
Just checked our two CRS125-24G-1S, with ros 6.12, have the same issue
 
xrayd
newbie
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2014 7:28 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Tue Apr 29, 2014 8:58 pm

Hello,
this VLAN Bug known?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
domainlider
just joined
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:33 am

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:36 am

I'm not found in 6.12 /certificate sign-ca . How do I get sign-ca ?
 
domainlider
just joined
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:33 am

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:40 am

Im not found /certificate sign-ca . How do I get sign-ca ?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
armandfumal
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 125
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 5:50 pm
Location: Huldange,LUX
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 30, 2014 8:33 am

PROBLEM REPORT

Hi all,

we are facing to CPU usage problem, all core are used to 50% at the same time every 10 sec.

We found that is DUDE using snmp query that causing that. stopping DUDE to use SNMP resolve the problem but I can't monitor cpu (graphing in dude) without SNMP.
And in profiling the cpu usage is under unclassified.
RouterOS 6.12
CCR1036

On 1100Ahx2 with same config and 6.12, no cpu issue. this behavior is on CCR plateform.

Thanks

Armand
Armand Fumal
________________________________________________________________
MikroTik & Ubiquity
 
domainlider
just joined
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:33 am

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 30, 2014 10:47 am

Hello,
this VLAN Bug known?
I encountered a similar problem. I'm helped :
1. Backup configuration
2. Reset to defaults
3. Restore configuration
 
xrayd
newbie
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2014 7:28 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 30, 2014 11:52 am

Hello,
this VLAN Bug known?
I encountered a similar problem. I'm helped :
1. Backup configuration
2. Reset to defaults
3. Restore configuration

You use mikrotik x86?
 
domainlider
just joined
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:33 am

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 30, 2014 12:24 pm

Hello,
this VLAN Bug known?
I encountered a similar problem. I'm helped :
1. Backup configuration
2. Reset to defaults
3. Restore configuration

You use mikrotik x86?
I'm use 1100AHx2 . After upgrade (fw 2.6 => 3.10, os 6.10 => 6.12) i'm detect several problems
1. Several ip adress link <unknown> interface
2. One ipip tunnel down after connect pptp client to router
3. /int ipip shows one pptp client - Bug?

After full reset configuration and restore - router worked!
 
estdata
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 99
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 9:05 pm
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 30, 2014 7:17 pm

I recently went to 6.12 apart and I started to mess with the router, and the lag, both in the internet and iptv. I went back to 6.10, and say that I am happy with that. No longer going anywhere no loudspeaker upgrade
don't forget to give me karma if got help
....
 
OrCAD
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 132
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:37 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Wed Apr 30, 2014 9:01 pm

I've bug with eoip interface disappear with some pppoe registrations. Is impossible to add new eoip tunnel with pppoe server on it.

When release 6.13 ?
or where I can download RC?

thans in advance.
IM
MTCNA - MTCRE - MTCTCE - MTCINE
 
rpingar
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 539
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 2:46 pm
Location: Italy

Re: v6.12 released

Thu May 01, 2014 12:14 am

I've bug with eoip interface disappear with some pppoe registrations. Is impossible to add new eoip tunnel with pppoe server on it.

When release 6.13 ?
or where I can download RC?

thans in advance.
IM

I reported the exact same bug on ticket: #2014041966000282
Seems it is related to some internal interfaces index bug.

They told me to be fixed in v6.13

regards
Ros
 
xrayd
newbie
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2014 7:28 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Thu May 01, 2014 1:21 am

Hello,
this VLAN Bug known?
I encountered a similar problem. I'm helped :
1. Backup configuration
2. Reset to defaults
3. Restore configuration


You use mikrotik x86?

I'm use 1100AHx2 . After upgrade (fw 2.6 => 3.10, os 6.10 => 6.12) i'm detect several problems
1. Several ip adress link <unknown> interface
2. One ipip tunnel down after connect pptp client to router
3. /int ipip shows one pptp client - Bug?

After full reset configuration and restore - router worked!
can someone confirm this bug on x86 ??
 
robertik
just joined
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:45 pm

Re: CCR1016-12G vlan issue.

Thu May 01, 2014 12:14 pm

Hi,

I have the same issue - I have created vlan on 6.12 and after some time it was missing.
Reported to support ticket number: 2014050166000161
CCR1016-12G
Strange vlan issue.
Added vlan 1286 on ether12 via winbox.
Close winbox, reopen, vlan now missing.
Under vlans tab in interfaces setup, there is a ppp-XXXX dynamic user listed??
Seems like the vlan interface name / index however mikrotik does it gets corrupted.

Resetted board to defaults, restored config from rsc export. Same result.
Downgraded to 6.7 and all seems well again.

Could not create supout.rif, as this unit was in production at the time and clients was going crazy.
Will try and recreate again and log ticket.
 
tkgit
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 59
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 8:32 am
Location: Dunedin, NZ
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Fri May 02, 2014 5:05 am

can mikrotik engineer change linux kernel in ROS v6 to other longterm version or stable version?
 
TechKiwi
just joined
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 6:12 am

Re: v6.12 released

Fri May 02, 2014 8:13 am

As a reference I have had issues with 6.12 and using the SSTP VPN.

After upgrading clients can connect but it will not pass VPN traffic (No changes to the configuration at all).

I have since rolled back to 6.10 and it is working again perfectly.

If anyone wants me to send logs feel free to send a message.
 
DjM
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 111
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 2:44 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Fri May 02, 2014 8:51 am

As a reference I have had issues with 6.12 and using the SSTP VPN.

After upgrading clients can connect but it will not pass VPN traffic (No changes to the configuration at all).

I have since rolled back to 6.10 and it is working again perfectly.

If anyone wants me to send logs feel free to send a message.
Make support file from VPN server and 2 clients and send it to support@mikrotik.com . I had similar issues with SSTP VPN so I also have to rollback to older version.
 
kellogs
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 114
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:55 am

Re: v6.12 released

Fri May 02, 2014 3:01 pm

do you guys have packet loss issues on 6.12?
 
iqt
just joined
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri Jun 07, 2013 11:04 am

Re: v6.12 released

Fri May 02, 2014 3:10 pm

I'm not found in 6.12 /certificate sign-ca . How do I get sign-ca ?
I had the same question and got no answer. http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 00#p422356

I guess you have to open a ticket.

Meanwhile use openssh to generate a self-signed CA or go back to ROS 6.11
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5934
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Fri May 02, 2014 3:20 pm

Please read description of "sign" command
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Sy ... neral_Menu
 
iqt
just joined
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri Jun 07, 2013 11:04 am

Re: v6.12 released

Fri May 02, 2014 4:12 pm

Please read description of "sign" command
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Sy ... neral_Menu
Thank you for updating the documentation.
CA certificates are created if key-usage=key-cert-sign set in the template.
If this is the new procedure, may I ask to adapt Winbox for new certificates please:
a) "Sign CA": Button is no longer needed
b) "Sign": CA-field should be optional (to create self-signed CA)
 
theprism
newbie
Posts: 27
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:11 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Sat May 03, 2014 6:10 pm

It looks like wireless "tx-power-mode=card-rates" is not supported anymore... however, the command still exists.
Does anyone know why?

P.S. Not sure if it's from v6.12 or before, since I upgraded from v6.0...
 
skibi82
newbie
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 7:09 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Sun May 04, 2014 11:41 am

Question I need to put on windows 8.1 ROS.
Unfortunately can not see network interfaces with Hyper-V.
Is ROS in general 6.x adapters work with Hyper-V?
 
marizo
newbie
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 8:41 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Sun May 04, 2014 9:40 pm

Yesterday I upgraded my home AP RB411AH to ROS 6.12 (from 5.26) and now script is broken.
I'm new in MT so I don't know - it's 6.12 or script fault. It sends me IP adress of Ethernet interface.
global ipadd;
:global ipaddext;
:local thisip [/ip address get [find interface=ether1] address];
/tool fetch url="http://myip.dnsomatic.com/" mode=http dst-path=mypublicip.txt
:local ipext [file get mypublicip.txt contents ]
put $ipaddext
:if ($ipadd != $thisip || $ipaddext != $ipext) do={
/tool e-mail send to=xxx@yyy.lv subject="$[/system identity get name] $[/system clock get time] $[/system clock get date] IP change"  body="New local IP $thisip New public IP $ipext" tls=yes;
   set ipadd $thisip;
   set ipaddext $ipext;
}
So far i understand - script can't fetch url or make mypublicip.txt.

Update:
Made some search in Google and repaired script:
:global oldlocalIP;
:global oldglobalIP;

:local localIP  [/ip address get [find interface="ether1"] address];
:local strDate [/system clock get date]
:local strTime [/system clock get time]
:local strSystemName [/system identity get name]

/tool fetch url="http://myip.dnsomatic.com/" mode=http dst-path=mypublicip.txt
:local globalIP [file get mypublicip.txt contents ]


:if ($localIP != $oldlocalIP || $globalIP != $oldglobalIP) do={
   /tool e-mail send to=xxx@yyy.lv subject="$strSystemName IP adreses maina $strDate $strTime" body="New ext IP: $globalIP New local IP: $localIP"
   set oldlocalIP $localIP;
   set oldglobalIP $globalIP;
}
Last edited by marizo on Tue May 13, 2014 7:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
saaremaa
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 156
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 7:48 pm
Location: Baltijos šalių miestas

Re: v6.12 released

Mon May 05, 2014 1:25 pm

can someone confirm this bug on x86 ??
this error we see on the bridge and vlan interfaces authorization PPPoE. RB 1000Ah2 6.13rc9 Apr/29/2014 08:02:26
and when SXT (sextant) is connected via a base station wds RB433L 6.12 Apr/14/2014 09:27:45 wds breaks vlan interface.
CMDR Saaremaa (Gutamaya Sierra Alpha Alpha)
 
odge
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 102
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 2:53 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Mon May 05, 2014 10:09 pm

Hi,

I can see the same here for 3 sstp links, always a reconnect after 2 minutes saying "terminating... - conn timeout" in the logs of the client.

A link from Windows to the router using sstp seems not to be reset after 2 minutes.

SSTP driving me crazy... why is it so unreliable. We have have x86 concentrator sitting in a datacenter, and about 50 sites connecting back to it, for sending netflow data, and for weeks some sstp clients work, then one day when they reconnect, they timeout after 2 minutes over and over again... and some other site starts working again normally.
 
leonset
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 9:09 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Tue May 06, 2014 10:01 am

Question I need to put on windows 8.1 ROS.
Unfortunately can not see network interfaces with Hyper-V.
Is ROS in general 6.x adapters work with Hyper-V?
AFAIK, ROS is not and will not be supported under Hyper-V. You may have better luck with Virtualbox or VMWare, but I have no personal experience with any of them wiht ROS.
 
User avatar
bysard
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 295
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 2:53 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Tue May 06, 2014 10:03 am

Hi,

PPTP also seems somehow bugged. I have upgraded 3x RB751U-2hnd from 5.26 to 6.12 in a lab enviroment. All three routers connect to the main x86 VMware virtualized RoS 5.26 router via PPTP VPN. I can also ping the routers from VPN endpoint without any lost packets. The connection seems up, but RIP doesn't exchange routes. If I try to connect via winbox to a VPN IP of the affected routers, I get DC in 5 seconds and nothing but router name loads. I have no problem accessing routers via LAN, but ove PPTP VPN I cannot. Everything was working without a problem with 5.26. Before I had winbox for 6.12 on RB751 DLL's loaded into memory I couldn't even get connected as the connection always hung at 189,2 KB received. When I connected through LAN I got the DLL, can manage router but as soon as I try to connect via VPN IP I get DC.
 
wolfeyes
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 11:37 am

Re: v6.12 released

Tue May 06, 2014 11:45 am

CRS125-24G-1S

Massive port flapping on CRS125 on latest 6.12 and 6.13rc7. Email sent with supout to support.
jan/02/1970 00:00:15 interface,info ether2 link up (speed 100M, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:16 interface,info ether1 link up (speed 10M, half duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:19 interface,info ether2 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:20 interface,info ether1 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:24 interface,info ether2 link up (speed 100M, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:25 interface,info ether1 link up (speed 10M, half duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:29 interface,info ether4 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:33 interface,info ether8 link up (speed 100M, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:34 interface,info ether4 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:37 interface,info ether4 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:38 interface,info ether4 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:41 interface,info ether4 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:44 interface,info ether4 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:45 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:45 interface,info ether8 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:46 interface,info ether8 link up (speed 100M, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:47 interface,info ether4 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:47 interface,info ether8 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:49 interface,info ether8 link up (speed 100M, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:52 interface,info ether10 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:53 interface,info ether10 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:56 interface,info ether10 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:57 interface,info ether10 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:57 interface,info ether12 link up (speed 100M, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:00:59 interface,info ether4 link down
jan/02/1970 00:00:59 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:01:00 interface,info ether10 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:01:01 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:01:01 interface,info ether10 link down
jan/02/1970 00:01:02 interface,info ether4 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:01:03 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:01:04 interface,info ether10 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:01:07 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:01:10 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:01:13 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:01:46 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:01:49 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:01:59 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:02:02 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:02:03 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:02:06 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:02:26 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:02:28 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:02:34 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:02:39 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:02:40 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:02:43 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:02:44 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:02:50 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:06:05 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:06:08 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:10:45 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:10:48 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:17:34 interface,info ether5 link down
jan/02/1970 00:17:37 interface,info ether5 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:19:35 interface,info ether10 link down
jan/02/1970 00:19:37 interface,info ether10 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
jan/02/1970 00:19:45 interface,info ether10 link down
jan/02/1970 00:19:47 interface,info ether10 link up (speed 1G, full duplex)
Just checked our two CRS125-24G-1S, with ros 6.12, have the same issue

Same problem stands also for me and for the very same device.
 
AlexS
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 258
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 7:21 am

Re: v6.12 released

Wed May 07, 2014 2:27 am

Did an upgrade of 2 ccr1036 to 6.12 from 6.10

went well, i had held of because of other reports.

All seems well.

I have lost my netflow info... strange still works on my x86 VM's not on my on ccr....
 
acung
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 5:57 pm
Location: Jakarta

Re: v6.12 released

Wed May 07, 2014 12:28 pm

CRS125-24G-1S




Same problem stands also for me and for the very same device.
Mikrotik support told me to ground the switch, did that and the port still flapping.
 
Neilson
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 174
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 10:42 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

Re: v6.12 released

Wed May 07, 2014 12:44 pm

Did an upgrade of 2 ccr1036 to 6.12 from 6.10

went well, i had held of because of other reports.

All seems well.

I have lost my netflow info... strange still works on my x86 VM's not on my on ccr....
Have you tried going into netflow and disabling the netflow then click ok.

Then go back in and turn it back on and see if you get your netflow data back.

I found my Netflow data playing up but it has seemed to come back after I tried this.

Regards
Alexander
 
Muqatil
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 574
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:03 pm
Location: London - UK
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Wed May 07, 2014 5:19 pm

It looks like wireless "tx-power-mode=card-rates" is not supported anymore... however, the command still exists.
Does anyone know why?

P.S. Not sure if it's from v6.12 or before, since I upgraded from v6.0...
Same here.. isn't Card Rates better than All rates Fixed mode? i don't think it was intended to be disabled..
Renato Bernardi

skype: medtech5
 
poli5681
newbie
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:47 am

Re: v6.12 released

Wed May 07, 2014 6:39 pm

It looks like wireless "tx-power-mode=card-rates" is not supported anymore... however, the command still exists.
Does anyone know why?

P.S. Not sure if it's from v6.12 or before, since I upgraded from v6.0...
Same here.. isn't Card Rates better than All rates Fixed mode? i don't think it was intended to be disabled..
As far as i know card-rates does not work with some newer models. I guess it´s a hardware limitation.
I remember it was mentioned to use "antenna gain" setting or "all rates fixed" (which is of course dangerous) instead.
 
telepro
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 63
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 7:50 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Wed May 07, 2014 6:55 pm

Hi,

I can see the same here for 3 sstp links, always a reconnect after 2 minutes saying "terminating... - conn timeout" in the logs of the client.

A link from Windows to the router using sstp seems not to be reset after 2 minutes.



SSTP driving me crazy... why is it so unreliable. We have have x86 concentrator sitting in a datacenter, and about 50 sites connecting back to it, for sending netflow data, and for weeks some sstp clients work, then one day when they reconnect, they timeout after 2 minutes over and over again... and some other site starts working again normally.

We are experiencing same problem with Mikrotik routers at both Client (951G) and Server (1100AHx2) ends. Same scenario: working for period of time, starts dropping connection every two minutes for random time (8 minutes to several days), then recovers and stays connected. Have submitted support request Ticket#2014031866000446 to support@mikrotik.com with documentation. Feel free to add your documentation to this ticket - perhaps it will provide the necessary information to help solve the problem (or at a minimum, generate a response)
 
AlexS
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 258
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 7:21 am

Re: v6.12 released

Thu May 08, 2014 12:05 am

Did an upgrade of 2 ccr1036 to 6.12 from 6.10

went well, i had held of because of other reports.

All seems well.

I have lost my netflow info... strange still works on my x86 VM's not on my on ccr....
Have you tried going into netflow and disabling the netflow then click ok.

Then go back in and turn it back on and see if you get your netflow data back.

I found my Netflow data playing up but it has seemed to come back after I tried this.

Regards
Alexander
Im a cli guy but yes

turned off
remove target
added target
turned on.

strangely I get some netflow, but only when I pushing 200Mbps + and it doesn't corrospond to the traffic :(



EDIT

/ip traffic-flow> monitor
finished-flows: 11005366
active-flows: 2979
unmanaged-packets: 0
unmanaged-bytes: 0

yet on nfsen I see no flow for the last 6 hours and I see no packets leaving the ccr for this ...
 
Antares
just joined
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 4:23 am

Re: v6.12 released

Thu May 08, 2014 8:58 am

Strange bug on CCR1036-12G-4S with ROS 6.12:
After 8 new vlan added, some vlan disappeared after a short time. IPv4 addresses and other features on these vlan show as "unknown" interface.
I try to add them again but getting error "this interface already exist".

Anyone else got similar problems?
CCR1036-12G-4S, CCR1016-12G, CRS125-24G-1S-RM, RB2011UAS-RM, RB2011UiAS-RM, RB2011UiAS-2HnD-IN, RB450G, RB912UAG-5HPnD, RB911G-5HPnD, SXTG-5HPnD-HGr2, SXTG-5HPnD-SAr2, OmnitikUPA-5HnD, BaseBox5, SXT G-5HnD, SXT 5HPnD, SXT Lite5.
 
angine
just joined
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 1:46 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Thu May 08, 2014 1:52 pm

ROS 6.12 RB2011. no buffer space available... Network doesn't work. After reboot everything ok. I tried to update the firmware but does not help.
 
AlexS
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 258
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 7:21 am

Re: v6.12 released

Thu May 08, 2014 2:00 pm

Strange bug on CCR1036-12G-4S with ROS 6.12:
After 8 new vlan added, some vlan disappeared after a short time. IPv4 addresses and other features on these vlan show as "unknown" interface.
I try to add them again but getting error "this interface already exist".

Anyone else got similar problems?
that happened on my upgrade but to my vlans' but when i re entered and I got the error, they magically re appeared and all has been fine since.
 
Kindis
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 248
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 6:54 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Sat May 10, 2014 11:19 pm

Question I need to put on windows 8.1 ROS.
Unfortunately can not see network interfaces with Hyper-V.
Is ROS in general 6.x adapters work with Hyper-V?

Use emulated network cards. That should work. Synthetic devices needs support from kernel which is not part of ROS kernel.





Sent from my RM-937_eu_euro1_935 using Tapatalk
 
steen
Member
Member
Posts: 469
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 2:15 am
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Sun May 11, 2014 7:47 pm

Hello Folks!

I have severe problems with CRS and v6.12.
Configuration is "Port Based VLAN" per the examples from here: http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:CRS_examples

The router was configured with one difference, master port is ether1 (recommendation from my distributor).

When the router is restarted, all ethernet switchports is "lost", the do not come on-line again.
If you try to do interface ethernet print, the device is stuck direktly and has to be unplugged and plugged in again.

We have another CRS not used for vlan, it is a pure switch, that one has no problems at all what we can see.

So it must be related to some bug or error in examples causing the.

Anybody out there who ever got CRS switch chip and vlans working ?
 
QCTIK
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 11:02 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Sun May 11, 2014 11:07 pm

MEGA BUG with crs-125

i've tried the vlan example (dated 17 april 2014)with port vlan using a group of switched port. Everything is fine until you put a tag on a port that desn't belong to the initial selected port in the group


the switch doesnt' boot it get stuck to starting services......

i replicated with two units.....

very urgent and pissing bug.....
 
janel
just joined
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 10:41 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Sun May 11, 2014 11:53 pm

same problem here, steen. Downgrade to the previous version worked for me.
 
becs
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 479
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 8:26 am

Re: v6.12 released

Mon May 12, 2014 8:38 am

Hello,
You can get an access to new RouterOS version which contains fixes for CRS VLAN tagging problem (v6.12) by writing to MikroTik support.
 
Antares
just joined
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 4:23 am

Re: v6.12 released

Mon May 12, 2014 11:09 am

Hi all!
I can`t configure vlans on CRS with ROS 6.12.
I try to use ROS 6.13rc14, tagged vlans routed by switch correct, tag/untag not correct. I configure tag/untag by CPU (like on RB2011 or other routers), it works for me.

Tagged vlans routing:
/interface ethernet switch egress-vlan-tag
add tagged-ports=ether1,ether4 vlan-id=21
add tagged-ports=ether1,ether5 vlan-id=22
Tag/untag vlan by create bridge from vlan and ethernet port:
/interface bridge
add l2mtu=1584 name=bridge1
/interface bridge port
add bridge=bridge1 interface=vlan23
add bridge=bridge1 interface=ether9
Last edited by Antares on Mon May 12, 2014 11:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
CCR1036-12G-4S, CCR1016-12G, CRS125-24G-1S-RM, RB2011UAS-RM, RB2011UiAS-RM, RB2011UiAS-2HnD-IN, RB450G, RB912UAG-5HPnD, RB911G-5HPnD, SXTG-5HPnD-HGr2, SXTG-5HPnD-SAr2, OmnitikUPA-5HnD, BaseBox5, SXT G-5HnD, SXT 5HPnD, SXT Lite5.
 
wolfeyes
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 11:37 am

Re: v6.12 released

Mon May 12, 2014 11:24 am


Mikrotik support told me to ground the switch, did that and the port still flapping.

After rolling back to v6.11 port flapping has been completely disappeared. Device in my case was grounded by the beginning of the installation. After all these days since last downgrade switch works smoothly and it is quite quite obvious that incident is clearly related to sw release.

@Mikrotik staff. We all saw how quick you responded for the vlan tagging issue. Why don't you also focus on the port flapping issue given the feedback you received on the reported incident? :?:
 
User avatar
bysard
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 295
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 2:53 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Tue May 13, 2014 8:40 am

Very stable, production ready release.... again.
 
User avatar
TrollMan
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 9:25 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Tue May 13, 2014 9:19 am

I too have the portflapp on my ccr1036 after 6.12. I only use 4 ports where two are connected with spf and two wiith copper. The flapping is on all ports, more or less the same second they all flapp, about once every hour or two.

I had to disable one of the copper ports (connected to a Netgear 105e) and the LCD. Since then I have had no flapping.
 
inframe
just joined
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 10:20 am

Re: v6.12 released

Tue May 13, 2014 10:28 am

Hello! My question is, how soon is support for UDP for OpenVPN? :-? .. I need it for VOIP
 
onnoossendrijver
Member
Member
Posts: 418
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 11:10 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: v6.12 released

Tue May 13, 2014 11:11 am

As Mikrotik has said many times there will be no UDP support for OpenVPN.
There are lots of alternatives for OpenVPN.
And if you desperately need OpenVPN with UDP you can install OpenWRT in metarouter or just use a second physical router for OpenVPN. These things are VERY cheap and power efficient.
Linux/network engineer: ITIL, LPI1, CCNA R+S, CCNP R+S, JNCIA, JNCIS-SEC
 
lelo
just joined
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 3:20 pm
Location: Poland

Re: v6.12 released

Tue May 13, 2014 1:10 pm

Hi Guys

About problem with DHCP server on VLAN interface, see my posts here:
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... 11#p425811
 
McTedson
newbie
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:04 pm
Location: .ro

Re: v6.12 released

Wed May 14, 2014 1:31 pm

ROS 6.12 RB2011. no buffer space available... Network doesn't work. After reboot everything ok. I tried to update the firmware but does not help.
Same problem here as well after uptime of 4 weeks....
 
User avatar
dibatech
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 81
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 10:14 am

RIP erratic between 5.26 and 6.12

Wed May 14, 2014 3:20 pm

Hi guys.
Can confirm that RIP seems to be behaving erratic when propagating connected routes between version 5.26 and 6.12.

I would like to tender my resignation to the Mikrotik Beta testing program. V6 Sucks. Period.
Please do me a favor and PM me when version 6 is useable.
 
User avatar
bysard
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 295
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 2:53 pm

Re: RIP erratic between 5.26 and 6.12

Wed May 14, 2014 3:41 pm

Hi guys.
Can confirm that RIP seems to be behaving erratic when propagating connected routes between version 5.26 and 6.12.

I would like to tender my resignation to the Mikrotik Beta testing program. V6 Sucks. Period.
Please do me a favor and PM me when version 6 is useable.
Don't you like the new icons in Winbox? :)
 
jarda
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 7602
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:46 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Wed May 14, 2014 5:27 pm

Please do me a favor and PM me when version 6 is useable.
PM functionality is disabled here...
 
Goasler
just joined
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2012 10:06 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Wed May 14, 2014 8:43 pm

Hello,

mipsbe v6.12 works fine on RB2011U-2HnD-in

Thanks, bye.
 
ners
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 99
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Wed May 14, 2014 11:05 pm

ROS 6.12 RB2011. no buffer space available... Network doesn't work. After reboot everything ok. I tried to update the firmware but does not help.
Same problem here as well after uptime of 4 weeks....
Same here, seems to be tied to L2TP/IPSec since I started experiencing this when I set up L2TP/IPSec access and started using it. Happened to me on 6.10 and 6.12.
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.12 released

Thu May 15, 2014 12:03 am

BEFORE EXIT 6.13 PLEASE FIX THIS BUG (present also on the last 6.13rc23):

BUG: THE PACKAGE CAN NOT BE DISABLED OR UNINSTALLED AFTER FIRST INSTALL WITH NETINSTALL.



EDIT: FIXED!!!
Last edited by rextended on Thu May 15, 2014 8:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
madpixel
just joined
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2014 10:55 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Thu May 15, 2014 5:34 am

Same thing
Cannot disable package on 6.13
On CCR1016 with 6.13rc23 I tried to disable ipv6 package.
Before reboot it is scheduled to disable, but after reboot it is enabled.
 
ners
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 99
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Thu May 15, 2014 9:23 am

RB2011UAS + ROS 6.12 + Firmware 3.14
09:51:01 l2tp,info first L2TP UDP packet received from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
09:51:01 l2tp,ppp,info,account coaxial logged in, 172.16.12.186
09:51:02 l2tp,ppp,info <l2tp-coaxial>: authenticated
09:51:02 l2tp,ppp,info <l2tp-coaxial>: connected
10:16:41 l2tp,ppp,info <l2tp-coaxial>: terminating... - disconnected
10:16:41 l2tp,ppp,info,account coaxial logged out, 1540 2978822 33503749 30339 31998
10:16:41 l2tp,ppp,info <l2tp-coaxial>: disconnected
10:18:16 system,info,account user xxx logged in via local

[xxx@rt-office.xxxxxxxx.net] > /ping 8.8.8.8
HOST SIZE TTL TIME STATUS
132 (No buffer space available)
132 (No buffer space available)
sent=2 received=0 packet-loss=100%

[xxx@rt-office.xxxxxxxx.net] > /sys reboot
Reboot, yes? [y/N]:
y
system will reboot shortly
This is maddening. L2TP+IPSec is very unreliable. The router has a high chance to stop forwarding traffic when someone is connected via L2TP+IPSec. When you try to ping something from the router, it returns "No buffer space available"

The only way to recover it seems to me is to log in via serial and reboot the router.
Last edited by ners on Thu May 15, 2014 11:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
 
McTedson
newbie
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:04 pm
Location: .ro

Re: v6.12 released

Thu May 15, 2014 11:24 am

ROS 6.12 RB2011. no buffer space available... Network doesn't work. After reboot everything ok. I tried to update the firmware but does not help.
Same problem here as well after uptime of 4 weeks....
Same here, seems to be tied to L2TP/IPSec since I started experiencing this when I set up L2TP/IPSec access and started using it. Happened to me on 6.10 and 6.12.
I am also using IPSEC on the routers which experienced the issue. I did not have logging enabled to disk, but now I do. Waiting for a lock up to see what the logfile says. IF it says ....
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.12 released

Thu May 15, 2014 8:15 pm

BEFORE EXIT 6.13 PLEASE FIX THIS BUG (present also on the last 6.13rc23):

BUG: THE PACKAGE CAN NOT BE DISABLED OR UNINSTALLED AFTER FIRST INSTALL WITH NETINSTALL.



EDIT: FIXED!!!

FIXED ON 6.13 (2014-05-15 18:36:58)!!! (but you must use netinstall to upgrade from 6.13rc23 to 6.13)
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
lotnybartek
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:22 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Thu May 15, 2014 9:22 pm

How can I get 6.13?
 
morf
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 159
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 5:31 pm
Location: Saint-Petersburg

Re: v6.12 released

Thu May 15, 2014 9:39 pm

Where i can see changelog in v6.13 ?
 
Shiro
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 6:44 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Thu May 15, 2014 11:45 pm

What's new in 6.13 (2014-May-15 16:03)::
*) console - comments are now accepted where new command can start, that is,
    where '/' or ':' characters can be used to start new command, e.g.
	/interface { # comment until the end of the line
	    print
	}
*) backup - backups by default are encrypted now (with user password).
   To use backup on older versions, you should disable encryption with dont-encrypt
   flag when creating it;
*) files with '.sensitive.' in the filename require 'sensitive'
    permission to manipulate;
*) lcd - reduce CPU usage when displaying static screens;
*) l2tp - fixed occasional server lockup;
*) pptp - fixed memory leak;
*) sstp - fixed crashes;
Issues so far on CCR-1009. Switch menu still missing from Winbox, its available on cli.
Upgrading from 6.13rc* to 6.13 failed, instant CCR crash, had to Netinstall to get it installed.
 
lotnybartek
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:22 pm

Re: v6.12 released

Fri May 16, 2014 8:29 am

Hmm, what about fixing L2TP/IPSec cache not flushing? I HOPE this is fixed in 6.13.

WHERE Can I download 6.13?
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.12 released

Fri May 16, 2014 9:48 am

Wait, is coming out, or subscribe to mikrotik site and write to support@mikrotik.com to be inserted in beta test program.
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.12 released

Fri May 16, 2014 9:49 am

What's new in 6.13 (2014-May-15 16:03)::
*) console - comments are now accepted where new command can start, that is,
    where '/' or ':' characters can be used to start new command, e.g.
	/interface { # comment until the end of the line
	    print
	}
*) backup - backups by default are encrypted now (with user password).
   To use backup on older versions, you should disable encryption with dont-encrypt
   flag when creating it;
*) files with '.sensitive.' in the filename require 'sensitive'
    permission to manipulate;
*) lcd - reduce CPU usage when displaying static screens;
*) l2tp - fixed occasional server lockup;
*) pptp - fixed memory leak;
*) sstp - fixed crashes;
Issues so far on CCR-1009. Switch menu still missing from Winbox, its available on cli.
Upgrading from 6.13rc* to 6.13 failed, instant CCR crash, had to Netinstall to get it installed.
You can use netinstall 6.12 for install 6.13 or other any versions from 4.16 to 6.13
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
User avatar
sergejs
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 6615
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 3:33 pm
Location: Riga, Latvia
Contact:

Re: v6.12 released

Fri May 16, 2014 11:10 am

Thank you very much for all reports.
v6.13 is released.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSN [Bot] and 97 guests