BGP works on all cores for many versions now. Only the loading of the routing table is done on one core, but when this is complete, all other processes use all cores. The most important tasks have all core supportWorking quickly and efficiently BGP. Currently, the three BGP peers, the time of recalculation of routes is far from acceptable. The whole is counted on one core, the declaration of support on is to be fixed in version 7 system. I heard it for the first time nearly a year ago - So the question is. When will be released?
I want to join if it is shown here that I also carried out.When we can expect first 7.0beta to testing?
what is new beside this ?In RouterOS v7 that we have now in alpha testing, CCR loads 15 million routes in approx 15 minutes. A router from a different manufacturer and a very big name, takes nearly twice as long. So future looks bright
I also agree.I hope the Web UI is much better.
some of my friend say that the Mikrotik Web UI is not user friendly enough.
I would like to have the bugs you said you wouldn't fix in 6.x fixed, no more than that.What specific things do you want to see in RouterOS 7?
Currently there are no drastic changes, because it is still a long time before v7 is ready for betawhat is new beside this ?In RouterOS v7 that we have now in alpha testing, CCR loads 15 million routes in approx 15 minutes. A router from a different manufacturer and a very big name, takes nearly twice as long. So future looks bright
I hope we can get more info about the new RouterOS v7
Hehe, nice one. @Utomo you can't expect to have a menu like on the soho routers. All this things that you can do have to be configured and for that there need to be lots of menus. It is pretty good structured. Actually there is QuickSet now that can help a home user to configure mikrotik for basic home usage.like adding a button 'Make everything working'?
So routers do not need redundancy?@andreacoppini it sounds like you are looking for a enterprise firewall rather than a router....
what do you mean?..the filters mechanism, different routing table for BGP <...> currently we do not have this in Mikrotik
an example?for example what I do in the bird several entries (in filters) in the Mikrotik often I have to create tens
filters mechanism in mikrotik is not intuitive and need to create large quantity's rules for more complex solution,
for example what I do in the bird several entries (in filters) in the Mikrotik often I have to create tens
(i think that filters must by like cisco/bird style)
another problem ... for example I have router witch 4 full prefix table for bgp and 4 incomplete table for bgp, on the same router I have ospf with public and private prefixes and one prefix for network menagement, on bird I create prefix table for bgp (on this prefix table work bird) and ip roule for rest... and thats all ....
please do the same on mikrotik ... you have to use routing mark, routing filters, (incoming, outgoing) and many many other things ....and on the end when you have to do troubleshoting you have to wait 10 minutes for print one prefix when you use "find prefix=" .... and this is on 36cores machine (ccr)....
I have one word to sum it up === disaster
PIM is on the cisco switch which is stands in one of IX node, then goes via VLAN to our CCR (another VLAN on the same port is for bgp session that goes to other participants in the this IX node)bawolek, how do you route/switch multicast traffic on CCR? it's not clear from your post
hm, I have almost the same config (multicast VLAN is bridged between ether1 and sfp-sfpplus1, tagged on both interfaces) - no problem so far with more than 2Gbps on sfp+CCR is nothing doing with multicast... he only untag vlan ... then multicast goes to stb...
VLAN is on ETH2, and this vlan is bridged with SFP1what port exactly your vlan is bridged to? Can you try 6.19rc on your CCR?
which is quite common PART of routers functionality. in recent 5 years - demand for Decent(DPI and etc) firewall in netoworking gear, rather than conntrack - was skyrocketing.@andreacoppini it sounds like you are looking for a enterprise firewall rather than a router....