Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
ibm
Member
Member
Topic Author
Posts: 306
Joined: Mon May 12, 2014 5:16 pm

PPPoE at 1500 MTU with EOIP, OSPF and future VLANS

Mon Feb 09, 2015 3:36 pm

I have a PPPoE server in a routed network and I would provide full 1500 MTU to pppoe clients and in future I could add some vlans from concentrator to clients, so now I have to setup the various interfaces MTU.
PPPoE adds 8 bytes overhead so interfaces MTU and L2MTU have to be at least 1508, but there are also EoIP and vlans... Anyone can help?
 
ibm
Member
Member
Topic Author
Posts: 306
Joined: Mon May 12, 2014 5:16 pm

Re: PPPoE at 1500 MTU with EOIP, OSPF and future VLANS

Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:34 pm

Anyone?
 
troffasky
Member
Member
Posts: 431
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2014 4:37 pm

Re: PPPoE at 1500 MTU with EOIP, OSPF and future VLANS

Sat Feb 14, 2015 12:29 am

What is your actual question?
 
ibm
Member
Member
Topic Author
Posts: 306
Joined: Mon May 12, 2014 5:16 pm

Sat Feb 14, 2015 9:29 am

What MTU and L2MTU I have to set on phisical interfaces and EoIP tunnel to provide 1500 pppoe MTU to the pppoe clients.
 
ibm
Member
Member
Topic Author
Posts: 306
Joined: Mon May 12, 2014 5:16 pm

Re: PPPoE at 1500 MTU with EOIP, OSPF and future VLANS

Thu Feb 26, 2015 8:10 pm

Update.
I set the following MTU:
- PPPoE MTU MRU 1500
- VLAN interfaces MTU 1500
- EoIP interfaces MTU 1512 (calculated as 8 byte for pppoe and 4 bytes for vlan)
- Ethernet interfaces MTU 1554 (calculates as 1512 + 42 byte eoip header )

Are they correct?
 
ibm
Member
Member
Topic Author
Posts: 306
Joined: Mon May 12, 2014 5:16 pm

Re: PPPoE at 1500 MTU with EOIP, OSPF and future VLANS

Mon Mar 02, 2015 9:02 pm

Anyone?
 
User avatar
NathanA
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 829
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 9:01 am

Re: PPPoE at 1500 MTU with EOIP, OSPF and future VLANS

Mon Mar 02, 2015 10:11 pm

Hmm, I thought we had already gone over this before. Are you doing 1500 MTU PPPoE without MRRU *over* the VLANs? Any interface you are running PPPoE over would need to be at least 1508 MTU, including VLANs.
Are they correct?
You tell me. Have you tested it? Does it work? Do you need external validation?

-- Nathan
 
ibm
Member
Member
Topic Author
Posts: 306
Joined: Mon May 12, 2014 5:16 pm

Mon Mar 02, 2015 10:22 pm

We had gone over this but there aren't VLAN and EoIP.
The PPPoE won'be over vlan but they are 2 parallels ways to provide some services. I tested it but I'm not sure because the icmp ping works different in routeros and Windows.
If I ping the pppoe server from Windows attached to pppoe client on a rb with pppoe over eoip I can ping without fragmentation with a maximum of 1472. If I ping from rb with pppoe client I can ping without fragmentation with a maximum of 1500 byte.
 
User avatar
NathanA
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 829
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 9:01 am

Re: PPPoE at 1500 MTU with EOIP, OSPF and future VLANS

Tue Mar 03, 2015 3:53 am

I tested it but I'm not sure because the icmp ping works different in routeros and Windows.
Ah, okay, that's where the confusion is. Yes, Windows treats the "size" parameter for ping differently than other operating systems. As Microsoft documents here, Windows ping size does not include headers, where many other operating systems ping commands do include headers; quoting from the site:
Note that the size parameter used by ping is the size of the data buffer to send, not including headers. The ICMP header consumes 8 bytes, and the IP header would normally be 20 bytes.
20 + 8 = 28, and 1500 - 28 = 1472. So in Windows, when you send pings with size = 1472 bytes, it is actually sending 1500 byte packets, because the 1472 byte size doesn't count the 28 bytes' worth of IP and ICMP headers in each packet sent.

-- Nathan
 
ibm
Member
Member
Topic Author
Posts: 306
Joined: Mon May 12, 2014 5:16 pm

Sat Mar 07, 2015 12:10 am

Many thanks

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot] and 211 guests