I was unable to reproduce this problem.issues found on v6.27rc16 (running on mAP lite)
Love the new version with only one wireless package!
However I found some issues
Wireless interface
/interface wireless connect-list does not work on virtual station. (on mAP2nd) When running with logging the network is listed (correct frequency), but the wireless interface claim that there is no network that satisfy the connect list.
--- IMPORTANT! DFS MODE CHANGES:
DFS mode setting is removed, and by default becomes forced to "dfs=radar-detect" for all
devices that use radar frequencies. If your client devices use a scan list with a few
specific frequencies that could conflict with radar frequencies, you could lose the
connection. It is recommended to widen the scan list range, use default scan list, or
change the AP frequency
If you are in some place where you can use the radar frequencies ... Use Superchannel mode and it won't matter--- IMPORTANT! DFS MODE CHANGES:
DFS mode setting is removed, and by default becomes forced to "dfs=radar-detect" for all
devices that use radar frequencies. If your client devices use a scan list with a few
specific frequencies that could conflict with radar frequencies, you could lose the
connection. It is recommended to widen the scan list range, use default scan list, or
change the AP frequency
Oh my God!
The problem is not using the radar frequencies, the problem is the (mis?)detection of radar on other frequencies whenIf you are in some place where you can use the radar frequencies ... Use Superchannel mode and it won't matter
Most likely your wireless package got disabled, this can sometimes happen if you have installed multiple wireless packages. No need to downgrade, just need to re-enable correct wireless npk.6.37rc19 Do not use RB433UAH hide all interfaces wireless (winbox, web) ethernet random refresh, wireless no configuration (remembers previous settings, broadcasts), ....downgrade previous build 6.37rc15
Most likely your wireless package got disabled, this can sometimes happen if you have installed multiple wireless packages. No need to downgrade, just need to re-enable correct wireless npk.6.37rc19 Do not use RB433UAH hide all interfaces wireless (winbox, web) ethernet random refresh, wireless no configuration (remembers previous settings, broadcasts), ....downgrade previous build 6.37rc15
You most definately need to send supout.rif file from rc19 to support@mikrotik.comIt's not this way
wireless packages activate build 6.37rc19 ( wireless AP view air)
build 6.37rc15 upgrade to 6.37rc19 > downgrade 6.37rc15 (works)
You most definately need to send supout.rif file from rc19 to support@mikrotik.com
This is with frequency set to auto on the ap-bridgeI was unable to reproduce this problem.issues found on v6.27rc16 (running on mAP lite)
Love the new version with only one wireless package!
However I found some issues
Wireless interface
/interface wireless connect-list does not work on virtual station. (on mAP2nd) When running with logging the network is listed (correct frequency), but the wireless interface claim that there is no network that satisfy the connect list.
Please provide us more information on that and also the wireless debug logs. Also make sure you select the correct security-profile in the connect-list.
831 Aug/18/2016 16:38:04 memory wireless, debug wlan2: no network that satisfies connect-list, by default choose with strongest signal
832 Aug/18/2016 16:38:04 memory wireless, debug wlan2: failed to select network
833 Aug/18/2016 16:38:04 memory wireless, debug wlan2: must select network
834 Aug/18/2016 16:38:04 memory wireless, debug empty
985 Aug/18/2016 16:41:21 memory wireless, debug <mac address>: on 2462 AP: yes SSID <correct network name> caps 0x1431 rates 0xCCK:11 OFDM:12-54 BW:1x SGI:1x HT:0-23 basic 0xCCK:11 MT: no
986 Aug/18/2016 16:41:21 memory wireless, debug <mac address>: on 2462 AP: yes SSID <correct network name> caps 0x1431 rates 0xCCK:11 OFDM:12-54 BW:1x SGI:1x HT:0-23 basic 0xCCK:11 MT: no
987 Aug/18/2016 16:41:21 memory wireless, debug <mac address>: on 2462 AP: yes SSID <different network name> caps 0x1431 rates 0xCCK:11 OFDM:12-54 BW:1x SGI:1x HT:0-23 basic 0xCCK:11 MT: no
988 Aug/18/2016 16:41:21 memory wireless, debug <mac address>: on 2462 AP: yes SSID caps 0x1431 rates 0xCCK:11 OFDM:12-54 BW:1x SGI:1x HT:0-23 basic 0xCCK:11 MT: no
989 Aug/18/2016 16:41:21 memory wireless, debug <mac address>: on 2462 AP: yes SSID caps 0x1431 rates 0xCCK:11 OFDM:12-54 BW:1x SGI:1x HT:0-23 basic 0xCCK:11 MT: no
990 Aug/18/2016 16:41:21 memory wireless, debug wlan2: no network that satisfies connect-list, by default choose with strongest signal
991 Aug/18/2016 16:41:21 memory wireless, debug wlan2: failed to select network
992 Aug/18/2016 16:41:22 memory wireless, debug wlan2: must select network
# aug/18/2016 16:46:13 by RouterOS 6.37rc16
# software id = G2LP-VRHH
#
/interface wireless
set [ find default-name=wlan1 ] band=2ghz-b/g/n channel-width=20/40mhz-eC \
disabled=no distance=indoors frequency=2462 mode=ap-bridge ssid=\
MikroTik-149006 wireless-protocol=802.11
add disabled=no mac-address=<mac-address> master-interface=wlan1 mode=\
station-pseudobridge name=wlan2
/ip neighbor discovery
set ether1 discover=no
/interface wireless security-profiles
add authentication-types=wpa-psk,wpa2-psk management-protection=allowed mode=\
dynamic-keys name=profile1 wpa-pre-shared-key=<password> \
wpa2-pre-shared-key=<password>
/ip pool
add name=default-dhcp ranges=192.168.88.10-192.168.88.254
/ip dhcp-server
add address-pool=default-dhcp disabled=no interface=wlan1 name=defconf
/interface wireless connect-list
add interface=wlan2 security-profile=profile1 ssid=<network name>
/ip address
add address=192.168.88.1/24 comment=defconf interface=wlan1 network=\
192.168.88.0
/ip dhcp-client
add comment=defconf dhcp-options=hostname,clientid disabled=no interface=ether1
add default-route-distance=0 dhcp-options=hostname,clientid disabled=no \
interface=wlan2
/ip dhcp-server network
add address=192.168.88.0/24 comment=defconf gateway=192.168.88.1
/ip dns
set allow-remote-requests=yes
/ip dns static
add address=192.168.88.1 name=router
/ip firewall filter
add action=accept chain=input comment="defconf: accept ICMP" protocol=icmp
add action=accept chain=input comment="defconf: accept established,related" \
connection-state=established,related
add action=drop chain=input comment="defconf: drop all from WAN" in-interface=\
ether1
add action=fasttrack-connection chain=forward comment="defconf: fasttrack" \
connection-state=established,related
add action=accept chain=forward comment="defconf: accept established,related" \
connection-state=established,related
add action=drop chain=forward comment="defconf: drop invalid" connection-state=\
invalid
add action=drop chain=forward comment=\
"defconf: drop all from WAN not DSTNATed" connection-nat-state=!dstnat \
connection-state=new in-interface=ether1
/ip firewall nat
add action=masquerade chain=srcnat comment="defconf: masquerade" out-interface=\
ether1
/system clock
set time-zone-name=Europe/Oslo
/system logging
add topics=wireless,debug
/system routerboard settings
set cpu-frequency=650MHz protected-routerboot=disabled
/tool mac-server
set [ find default=yes ] disabled=yes
add interface=wlan1
/tool mac-server mac-winbox
set [ find default=yes ] disabled=yes
add interface=wlan1
At start hap ac wireless interfaces is work. run 2-5 minuts - result: hide all wireless interfaces in inbox menu on 6.37rc19 and networks not working!Most likely your wireless package got disabled, this can sometimes happen if you have installed multiple wireless packages. No need to downgrade, just need to re-enable correct wireless npk.6.37rc19 Do not use RB433UAH hide all interfaces wireless (winbox, web) ethernet random refresh, wireless no configuration (remembers previous settings, broadcasts), ....downgrade previous build 6.37rc15
for me is ok6.37rc19 Do not use RB433UAH hide all interfaces wireless (winbox, web) ethernet random refresh, wireless no configuration (remembers previous settings, broadcasts), ....downgrade previous build 6.37rc15
[raffaello@RJ-AT-MK02 - CAP1] > interface wireless print without-paging
Flags: X - disabled, R - running
0 X ;;; COMERCIAL --- wireless
name="Wap45_comercial" mtu=1500 l2mtu=1600 mac-address=02:15:6D:68:40:71 arp=enabled interface-type=virtual master-interface=wlan1 mode=ap-bridge ssid="comercial_answer" vlan-mode=no-tag vlan-id=1
wds-mode=disabled wds-default-bridge=none wds-ignore-ssid=no bridge-mode=enabled default-authentication=no default-forwarding=no default-ap-tx-limit=0 default-client-tx-limit=0 hide-ssid=no
security-profile=comercial_answer
1 X ;;; DIRETORIA --- wireless
name="Wap75_diretoria" mtu=1500 l2mtu=1600 mac-address=02:15:6D:68:40:74 arp=enabled interface-type=virtual master-interface=wlan1 mode=ap-bridge ssid="diretoria_answer" vlan-mode=no-tag vlan-id=1
wds-mode=disabled wds-default-bridge=none wds-ignore-ssid=no bridge-mode=enabled default-authentication=yes default-forwarding=yes default-ap-tx-limit=0 default-client-tx-limit=0 hide-ssid=no
security-profile=diretoria_answer
2 X ;;; LOGISTICA --- wireless
name="Wap85_logistica" mtu=1500 l2mtu=1600 mac-address=02:15:6D:68:40:70 arp=enabled interface-type=virtual master-interface=wlan1 mode=ap-bridge ssid="logistica_answer" vlan-mode=no-tag vlan-id=1
wds-mode=disabled wds-default-bridge=none wds-ignore-ssid=no bridge-mode=enabled default-authentication=yes default-forwarding=yes default-ap-tx-limit=0 default-client-tx-limit=0 hide-ssid=no
security-profile=logistica_answer
3 X ;;; VISITANTE --- wireless
name="Wap145_visitante" mtu=1500 l2mtu=1600 mac-address=02:15:6D:68:40:6F arp=enabled interface-type=virtual master-interface=wlan1 mode=ap-bridge ssid="visitante_answer" vlan-mode=no-tag vlan-id=1
wds-mode=disabled wds-default-bridge=none wds-ignore-ssid=no bridge-mode=enabled default-authentication=yes default-forwarding=yes default-ap-tx-limit=0 default-client-tx-limit=0 hide-ssid=no
security-profile=visitante_answer
4 X ;;; MOBILE-RJ --- wireless
name="Wap146_mobile-rj" mtu=1500 l2mtu=1600 mac-address=02:15:6D:69:38:B0 arp=enabled interface-type=virtual master-interface=wlan1 mode=ap-bridge ssid="answer_mobile" vlan-mode=no-tag vlan-id=146
wds-mode=disabled wds-default-bridge=none wds-ignore-ssid=no bridge-mode=enabled default-authentication=yes default-forwarding=yes default-ap-tx-limit=0 default-client-tx-limit=0 hide-ssid=no
security-profile=mobile_answer
5 X ;;; TI --- Wireless
name="Wap155_TI" mtu=1500 l2mtu=1600 mac-address=02:15:6D:68:40:75 arp=enabled interface-type=virtual master-interface=wlan1 mode=ap-bridge ssid="TI_answer" vlan-mode=no-tag vlan-id=155 wds-mode=disabled
wds-default-bridge=none wds-ignore-ssid=no bridge-mode=enabled default-authentication=yes default-forwarding=yes default-ap-tx-limit=0 default-client-tx-limit=0 hide-ssid=no security-profile=TI_answer
6 X ;;; TI --- Wireless Mobile
name="Wap156_MOBILE" mtu=1500 l2mtu=1600 mac-address=02:15:6D:69:38:AF arp=enabled interface-type=virtual master-interface=wlan1 mode=ap-bridge ssid="W_TI" vlan-mode=no-tag vlan-id=1 wds-mode=disabled
wds-default-bridge=none wds-ignore-ssid=no bridge-mode=enabled default-authentication=no default-forwarding=no default-ap-tx-limit=0 default-client-tx-limit=0 hide-ssid=yes security-profile=TI_Mobile
7 X ;;; managed by CAPsMAN
;;; channel: 2412/20/g(21dBm), SSID: diretoria_answer, CAPsMAN forwarding
name="wlan1" mtu=1500 l2mtu=1600 mac-address=D4:CA:6D:14:01:F3 arp=enabled interface-type=Atheros AR5413 mode=ap-bridge ssid="answer_wireless" frequency=auto band=2ghz-b/g channel-width=20mhz
scan-list=default wireless-protocol=802.11 antenna-mode=ant-a vlan-mode=no-tag vlan-id=97 wds-mode=disabled wds-default-bridge=none wds-ignore-ssid=no bridge-mode=disabled default-authentication=no
default-forwarding=no default-ap-tx-limit=0 default-client-tx-limit=0 hide-ssid=yes security-profile=TI_answer compression=no
[raffaello@RJ-AT-MK02 - CAP1] > system package print
Flags: X - disabled
# NAME VERSION SCHEDULED
0 routeros-mipsbe 6.37rc19
1 system 6.37rc19
2 ipv6 6.37rc19
3 wireless 6.37rc19
4 hotspot 6.37rc19
5 dhcp 6.37rc19
6 mpls 6.37rc19
7 routing 6.37rc19
8 ppp 6.37rc19
9 security 6.37rc19
10 advanced-tools 6.37rc19
raffaello@RJ-AT-MK02 - CAP1] > system resource print
uptime: 6m35s
version: 6.37rc19 (testing)
build-time: Aug/18/2016 06:45:52
free-memory: 104.7MiB
total-memory: 128.0MiB
cpu: MIPS 24Kc V7.4
cpu-count: 1
cpu-frequency: 680MHz
cpu-load: 4%
free-hdd-space: 492.1MiB
total-hdd-space: 512.0MiB
write-sect-since-reboot: 237
write-sect-total: 45367767
bad-blocks: 0.2%
architecture-name: mipsbe
board-name: RB433UAH
platform: MikroTik
okraffav I use „Extra packages” (all_packages...) the terminal I was not looking, important WinBox
Cause only ones that can help you are reachable via that mail, to make sure that RC20 doesn't have this problem.macgaiver: why he wrote it? post+1? your is spamer
You most definately need to send supout.rif file from rc19 to support@mikrotik.com
wrong(. every time cap have a new number of virtual cap wlan on reconnect. if it's was be so easy i'm not write here. but thank you for your answer).Don't use dynamic enable
Use enable only
Enviado de meu XT1580 usando Tapatalk
Sorry, but sometimes is wrong there,wrong(. every time cap have a new number of virtual cap wlan on reconnect. if it's was be so easy i'm not write here. but thank you for your answer).Don't use dynamic enable
Use enable only
Enviado de meu XT1580 usando Tapatalk
Can you be more specific? What simple queue configurations are affected? how much?*) simple queues - fixed issue which caused additional/unnecessary CPU load;
I try fistly write br number in datapath but nothing(.Sorry, but sometimes is wrong there,wrong(. every time cap have a new number of virtual cap wlan on reconnect. if it's was be so easy i'm not write here. but thank you for your answer).Don't use dynamic enable
Use enable only
Enviado de meu XT1580 usando Tapatalk
My cap number don't change when devices is rebooted
Edit:
Now I got it
I understand another Dynamic number [emoji57]
The caps number on the cap device it Is normal to increase ( Why need to be like that I don't know)
The trick is to use data path settings so the caps interface go to the correct bridge
Enviado de meu XT1580 usando Tapatalk
unset something is not the same as setting an empty value for it. it may work out the same in some cases, but be different in others.Feature request:
Allow unset at every place where it's possible to set an empty value (example: bgp update source, unset update-source does not work, set update-source=none is needed. firewall log prefix, set log-prefix="" works, but unset log-prefix does not work.).
[admin@cr1.zrh1] /routing bgp peer> :put [get 6 update-source ]
[admin@cr1.zrh1] /routing bgp peer> set 6 update-source=1.2.3.4
[admin@cr1.zrh1] /routing bgp peer> :put [get 6 update-source ]
1.2.3.4
[admin@cr1.zrh1] /routing bgp peer> unset 6 update-source
input does not match any value of value-name
[admin@cr1.zrh1] /routing bgp peer> set 6 update-source=none
[admin@cr1.zrh1] /routing bgp peer> :put [get 6 update-source ]
I too am looking for more information. Don't see anything in the wiki yet?*) snmp - added script table which executes script and returns it's output on get request;
Please explain how to use this feature, because I cannot find it in the user interface...
Yes, tried resetting config, and the RB fw is up to date. Mikrotik responded that it could be a new way signal strenght is calculated...Have you tried resetting the wireless config and redoing it? Is your RB firmware up to date?
performance seems to be the same, all signal led lights are still on my Groove...I think I noticed that, but related to chain numbers... maybe the case as you have only one chain. Have you tested the link to see if there are actual performance differences?
So we (using Groove) had false info for wireless signal strenght this whole time? MikroTik, what did you change for the RC versions so it shows different signal quality? A bug, or?48db signal to noise sounds just about impossible in the real world on unlicensed freq. We have licensed links running under -50 that don't see 48db SNR. I would guess the first set of numbers are more accurate.
OK, but what I need is someone from MikroTik to confirm that it isn't just a bug that will come into the next stable version.To enhance those wireless values precision. They're crucial in order to tune and troubleshoot wireless links.
Remember a 3dB diference is actually a double increase or a half decrease...
Just a silly question
Just a silly question
It not to check TX and RX on both chain?
Enviado de meu XT1580 usando Tapatalk
NoJust a silly question
It not to check TX and RX on both chain?
Enviado de meu XT1580 usando Tapatalk
what silly i have click on tx chain 1 and u see on my image there my registered client not having a chain1 sgnal...zoom it see clearly
NoJust a silly question
It not to check TX and RX on both chain?
Enviado de meu XT1580 usando Tapatalk
what silly i have click on tx chain 1 and u see on my image there my registered client not having a chain1 sgnal...zoom it see clearly
On your 1 print
You check chain 0 TX and RX
chain 1 only Rx is checked
On 2 print on chain 1 only TX is checked
My silly question was
the correct way is not to check both TX and RX on both chain 01
Enviado de meu XT1580 usando Tapatalk
OkNoJust a silly question
It not to check TX and RX on both chain?
Enviado de meu XT1580 usando Tapatalk
what silly i have click on tx chain 1 and u see on my image there my registered client not having a chain1 sgnal...zoom it see clearly
On your 1 print
You check chain 0 TX and RX
chain 1 only Rx is checked
On 2 print on chain 1 only TX is checked
My silly question was
the correct way is not to check both TX and RX on both chain 01
Enviado de meu XT1580 usando Tapatalk
dear brother .... i did not post here what is corect way to check..my basicaly point to show chain 1 not working...here i tel u why.....i have mostly speed issue through that...so i test it deeply why it happen ,mostly only with these devcies....so i decide to check chains....
device have tx and rx wht ever i select on chain..but should have click on tx and rx for receiving and sending data...
1)when i checked on "TX AND RX ON CHAIN 0" my system connect with my accesspoint and i use my internet and shering services...device working on single chain..
2)and when i checked on "TX AND RX ON CHAIN 1" then my system not connected with my accesspoint....thats show chain 1 not working....
3)in images i show the behaviour of chain 1 .... when i click on TX "CHAIN 1" with tx and rx chain0 ..my system connected with it and show the chain0 and chain 1 sgnal on registered client properties..giving sgnal its not the sign that device transfer the data through chain 1...and anotherway when i checked on tx and rx chain 0 and rx only chain 1 ..then also my system conet with my accesspoint..and regitered client properties not show the chain 1 signal....i hope some admin note it ....if i am rong then correct me...
can there be some detail "unnecessary CPU usage in simple queues", eg not sources code of course but explanations a bit ?
Simple Queue hashing algorithm had an issue which caused hash rebuilds. This caused additional CPU load. This fix affects all Simple Queue configurations but improvement depends on queue count and complexity.
This issue was found on Intel based x86 installation with ~6500 Simple Queues. Load after upgrade went down from 70-80% to 20-30%.
I already mail to support mikrotik...and i dnt think so it startex with 6.37rc22..i have speed issue from 1st day...mostly people said wirless giving bad reception...so i test deeply it and discover that issue...u saw img that i post link http://imgur.com/a/bJptd...i click on tx rx chain 0 and tx on chain 1....but in registerd client sgnl status client not have chain 1 sgnal...i downgradge to v5.26 both chain working good...but problem is here oly one basebox2 working ..2nd basebox giving license issue ..on erery reboot software id chage randomly...so i upgrate it back to 6.37rc22...is there any solution i downgradge it to 5.26 without licence errorvikibhai, please contact support@mikrotik.com about your TX/RX chain0/chain1 signal reading problem. The problem of the signal not reading started with v6.37rc22?
Also please note that chain0 RX should always be enabled as chain0 is considered the main chain.
[admin@RB411_102] > interface ethernet
[admin@RB411_102] /interface ethernet>
.. -- go up to interface
blink -- Generate traffic to blink leds
cable-test --
comment -- Set comment for items
disable -- Disable items
edit --
enable -- Enable items
export -- Print or save an export script that can be used to restore configuration
find -- Find items by value
get -- Gets value of item's property
monitor -- Monitor interface status
print -- Print values of item properties
reset-counters --
reset-mac-address --
set -- Change item properties
switch --
[admin@RB411_102] /interface ethernet>
Yeah, I'm wondering if this can help with the CRS shortcoming (no STP for switch group ports). I haven't purchased CRS yet because of this.About loop protect: How is that handled if interface is in a bridge / switch group?
How is routing performance improved?
@emils maybe?I too am looking for more information. Don't see anything in the wiki yet?*) snmp - added script table which executes script and returns it's output on get request;
Please explain how to use this feature, because I cannot find it in the user interface...
where?!) ethernet - added new loop-protect feature for ethernet,vlan,eoip,eoipv6 interfaces (http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Loop_Protect);
(I presume this is about the snmp script table)This is just the initial release for this new feature. We are still polishing it, writing documentation and fixing some bugs. Until it is done, you will have to explore it by yourselves.
under interfaces.Can you at least indicate where this feature can be found in the command structure?
I have been looking in /system script and in /snmp but I have been unable to find any command or option referring to a script table.
/interface ethernet set <tab><tab>
I am taliking about this:under interfaces.Can you at least indicate where this feature can be found in the command structure?
I have been looking in /system script and in /snmp but I have been unable to find any command or option referring to a script table.
Thanks, I see the entries now.pe1chl, you can download the latest Mikrotik.mib file and look for differences between the previous version. Mikrotik.mib.
This is just the initial release for this new feature. We are still polishing it, writing documentation and fixing some bugs. Until it is done, you will have to explore it by yourselves.
irghost, are you sure you have the latest release candidate version installed? On what RouterBOARD you can not find this function?
/interface ethernet set etherX loop-protect<tab>
Just upgraded board from 6.35.4, with 4 wireless packages on it -fp and -cm2 (in bundle) -cm2 and -rep separately, enabled -rep.All known wireless package issues after system upgrade should be fixed now.
I agree with this! I use wireless-rep without a direct bridge as setup when using it as a repeater.Feature request for wireless-package:
As we have the mode "aligment only", I'd like to have a mode "Virtual only".
I would like to have it too. Very useful.I agree with this! I use wireless-rep without a direct bridge as setup when using it as a repeater.Feature request for wireless-package:
As we have the mode "aligment only", I'd like to have a mode "Virtual only".
The station should connect to a WiFi AP, then I setup a VPN over that link, and the VPN network is offered on the bridge-ap configured using wireless-rep.
It is very inconvenient that the bridge-ap does not work when the station is not connected, e.g. you want to set the password on the station
by logging in to the MikroTik. That is now only possible using a cable.
(of course I understand the trouble beneath this: when the station is not connected it will be scanning the frequencies to find an AP,
and the bridge-ap is using the same hardware so the same frequency, which is not stable then. however, with dual-chain devices
or some clever timeouts this can probably be solved?)
Hi Sergejs + Team,*) mpls - fixed memory leak;
Lately changelog is as precise as they are willing/allowed to answer. for example - you wouldn't like them to reveal information that can potentially be used to trigger this on purpose. Especially while the fix is only in RC versions. Questions like this are dangerous.Hi Sergejs + Team,
Can you please provide more detail on this fix. Specifically what the triggers for the memory leak were, this way we can know exactly what problems it will solve.
Thanks!
17:24:09 system,info package wireless@ is scheduled for disable by ***
17:24:18 system,info disabled wireless@-6.37rc34
17:24:21 system,info router rebooted
/system package print terse where disabled=no name=wireless
0 name=wireless version=6.37rc34 build-time=sep/12/2016 13:06:07 scheduled="" bundle=routeros-mipsbe
Thanks Sergejs, macgaiver perfectly explained with a context I had not thought about.nz_monkey,
We had ticket with MPLS configuration, that produced memory leak. This is fixed, however it is actual for very specific configurations. And I do not have to add more that previous poster replied.
DHCPv6 still does not work like before v 6.33.6.Version 6.37rc34 has been released,
Changes since 6.37rc32:
*) dhcpv6 - improved interface status tracking;
*) modem - added d-link dwm-222 support;
I stand corrected. Thank you. I will re-check the version and try again with latest.6.37rc36 @ RB433 does not see rc38 for download.
How to solve this?
How to remove the old used Wireless Pack?
what winbox loader version are you using?6.37rc38 on hAP AC
Trying to use QuickSet from Winbox in Home AP Dual mode - unable to save config as 'Band' always stays red whatever settings for 2GHz and 5GHz are chosen. Works ok from Web config page though.
It is supported for a while already or you are looking some other setting:Is there any reason why NTP client still does not support DNS? It would be great if I could finally get rid of my script for this.
/system ntp client set server-dns-names=NTP_SERVER_NAME
I don't have server-dns-names as a configuration parameter. These are the options I have on MikroTik hardware:It is supported for a while already or you are looking some other setting:Code: Select all/system ntp client set server-dns-names=NTP_SERVER_NAME
[admin@MikroTik] > system ntp client set
enabled mode primary-ntp secondary-ntp
Do you maybe using ntp package ?Both primary-ntp and secondary-ntp require an IP address.
withoutsystem ntp client set
enabled mode primary-ntp secondary-ntp
if you don't need ntp server don't have any reason to use ntp package.system ntp client set
enabled primary-ntp secondary-ntp server-dns-names
Thanks! That was the issue.if you don't need ntp server don't have any reason to use ntp package.
It does make sense. The NTP package provides an NTP server and it works with fixed server addresses. Sure it would beIt doesn't make sense to me that the server-dns-names option should not be available with the NTP package installed.
I really don't buy this argument. What you describe is really an implementation rather than technical (or even best-practices) issue.It does make sense. The NTP package provides an NTP server and it works with fixed server addresses. Sure it would be
nice if there was the possibility to use DNS names there, but you should understand that in that case the DNS names would
be resolved only one time after router reboot. And there may even be dependency problems in that the router wants to set
the clock correctly before it has started the DNS resolver.
Still the same problems... now the same with RC40...Package list (Check For Updates) doesn't seem to grab the latest RC version.
It is the same in all NTP server implementations. NTP servers lock onto reference servers, and would not work OK when the actualI really don't buy this argument. What you describe is really an implementation rather than technical (or even best-practices) issue.
OK, I have now updated to the latest rc (6.37rc40) by downloading from mikrotik.com/download and updating routeros manually.6.37rc36 @ RB433 does not see rc38 for download.
Let it work the same way as other ntp servers do, that's fine. No one asks for hostname being resolved again and again for each poll.NTP servers lock onto reference servers, and would not work OK when the actual
server changes for subsequent polls. So NTP server implementations lookup the DNS name only when started.
I am considering adding screenshots to give a better idea of what I mean in case someone does not understand the problem. Unfortunately, I haven't figured out how to upload screenshots. If I try to insert an image, then it looks like it expects the image to exist already on the internet, but I would like upload the image from my computer - how do I do that on this forum?OK, I have now updated to the latest rc (6.37rc40) by downloading from mikrotik.com/download and updating routeros manually.6.37rc36 @ RB433 does not see rc38 for download.
I did the same test: Do a download via the 5Ghz 802.11ac. My hardware is an Intel 7260 a/b/g/n/ac adapter. When I download via my Asus RT-AC68U router which uses a Broadcom BCM4360 chipset, I get full mimo transfers at up to 866 Mb/s (actual transfer speed is about 320Mb/s). Unfortunately, when the Intel card is connected to the 5 Ghz hAP ac MikroTik router, then I only get a bitrate of 433Mb/s max (1 chain) on receiving or around 210Mb/s and 866 Mb/s (2 chains) on transmitting. Again, this issue happens also on 6.36.3 and 6.34.6 versions. Interestingly, the bug only happens when the receive signal is negotiate above 195 Mb/s.
Qiet72
I seem to remember that you have to use the mac address of the ap you want to connect to instead of the ssid when you want to connect to a hidden access point.Is it possible to use the wireless-connect-list to connect to HIDDEN ssid's? Am I blind, or is there no possibility?
Thanks for your answer, I tried it without success. My Ap has several hidden wifi with the same mac, so how can the microtik connection-list determine whichI seem to remember that you have to use the mac address of the ap you want to connect to instead of the ssid when you want to connect to a hidden access point.
Qiet72
Ohh boy... that is not good! Did the AP allow you to configure it that way? Did you have to force it somehow?My Ap has several hidden wifi with the same mac
You may be overthinking it. DNS resolver in RouterOS is simple service, it must start up in no time. Making it a dependency for NTP client should not be a problem. And even if not, and NTP client was not able to resolve hostname, it would succeed a second later. No big deal to most users.Maybe the issue could be solved by adding the capability for at least 2 DNS names in addition to the existing 2 fixed
addresses, and the NTP server could delay the resolving of DNS names until it has DNS available.
You say: "My Ap has several hidden wifi with the same mac" - do you mean you have multiple Virtual AP's with the same mac address beside the one physical AP?Thanks for your answer, I tried it without success. My Ap has several hidden wifi with the same mac, so how can the microtik connection-list determine whichI seem to remember that you have to use the mac address of the ap you want to connect to instead of the ssid when you want to connect to a hidden access point.
Qiet72
wifi to choose, when it has no information about the ssid? Maybe that's the reason why it didn't work in my test?
No, I have ONE AP(not mikrotik) with several hidden SSIDs. each of this ssids have a name, like private-net and guestnet.You say: "My Ap has several hidden wifi with the same mac" - do you mean you have multiple Virtual AP's with the same mac address beside the one physical AP?
Qiet72
Every virtual AP should, by default, get its own unique mac address. Otherwise, clients will get confused even when the network is visible.No, I have ONE AP(not mikrotik) with several hidden SSIDs. each of this ssids have a name, like private-net and guestnet.You say: "My Ap has several hidden wifi with the same mac" - do you mean you have multiple Virtual AP's with the same mac address beside the one physical AP?
Qiet72
Every hidden ssid has the same mac-adresss.
So when i want to connect to the "private-net", how can i be shure that i'm connected to this net when i use ssid=MAC instead of ssid=private-net?
Please verify that again. I don't think it is true, and if it is true I don't think it can work.No, I have ONE AP(not mikrotik) with several hidden SSIDs. each of this ssids have a name, like private-net and guestnet.
Every hidden ssid has the same mac-adresss.
This will be fixed/added in the RouterOS v7 only as current implementation doesn't allow that to add in v6 for the NTP package.Thanks! That was the issue.if you don't need ntp server don't have any reason to use ntp package.
@MikroTik, please fix the inconsistency. It doesn't make sense to me that the server-dns-names option should not be available with the NTP package installed.
There are so many things that will be available in v7 only, the most important (for me) are IPv6 routing enhancements (like the recursive lookup of BGP routes), I hope that we will be able to see it soon enough!This will be fixed/added in the RouterOS v7 only as current implementation doesn't allow that to add in v6 for the NTP package.
Excuse my persistence, but can anyone answer me, why double recursive route is inactive while it's gateway is active?..Does anyone have problems with recursive routing? I used this manual (Multiple host checking per Uplink), and everything works fine on first router. But exactly the same configuration (except gateways, of course) doesn't work on another two routers. When i add default route via virtual host 10.1.1.1, this route becomes active for several seconds, then becomes inactive. When i checked 10.1.1.1 (terminal-ip route check 10.1.1.1) - everything is ok. It seems to me, it's a bug. Tested on 6.36.2/6.36.3/6.36rc40/6.37
That is not true. All countries in the EU, and the USA should have already been using this setting for a long time, and there are no problems like you describe.with "radar-detect" enabled will end in endless frequency search loop, even when there is realy no radar
RouterOS already has a superchannel mode that does exactly this.I hope taht there will be country "other"
please make a new topic and post some details of actual config and state ("/ip route print detail", etc). as you can see, your question is not about 6.37rc exactlyExcuse my persistence, but can anyone answer me, why double recursive route is inactive while it's gateway is active?..Does anyone have problems with recursive routing? I used this manual (Multiple host checking per Uplink), and everything works fine on first router. But exactly the same configuration (except gateways, of course) doesn't work on another two routers. When i add default route via virtual host 10.1.1.1, this route becomes active for several seconds, then becomes inactive. When i checked 10.1.1.1 (terminal-ip route check 10.1.1.1) - everything is ok. It seems to me, it's a bug. Tested on 6.36.2/6.36.3/6.36rc40/6.37
thanks BartoszP for answering, i know that 6.37 only has one wireless-package.2 year old sony-tv does not work with wireless-rep package. wireless-cm2 works as expected.
Thanks for answering.It could depend on some settings, e.g. aes/tkip for group ciphers.
Try to enable tkip for group cipher.Thanks for answering.It could depend on some settings, e.g. aes/tkip for group ciphers.
I posted a more in-dept message in the new 6.37 thread and think we should continoue there...?
My settings are the same on every MT-AP-device: WPA2-PSK and aes-ccm, no tkip.
No difference. Here is the Debuglog from 3.26.3 with enables TKIPTry to enable tkip for group cipher.
02:02:31 wireless,debug wlan1: 00:12:F0:6E:DD:XX attempts to associate
02:02:31 wireless,debug wlan1: reject 00:12:F0:6E:DD:XX, banned (last failure - extensive data loss)
02:02:34 wireless,debug wlan1: 00:12:F0:6E:DD:XX attempts to associate
02:02:34 wireless,debug wlan1: reject 00:12:F0:6E:DD:XX, banned (last failure - extensive data loss)
02:02:37 wireless,debug wlan1: 00:12:F0:6E:DD:XX attempts to associate
02:02:37 wireless,debug wlan1: reject 00:12:F0:6E:DD:XX, banned (last failure - extensive data loss)
02:02:40 wireless,debug wlan1: 00:12:F0:6E:DD:XX attempts to associate
02:02:40 wireless,debug wlan1: 00:12:F0:6E:DD:XX not in local ACL, by default accept
02:02:40 wireless,info 00:12:F0:6E:DD:XX@wlan1: connected
02:02:43 wireless,debug wlan1: 00:12:F0:6E:DD:XX attempts to associate
02:02:43 wireless,info 00:12:F0:6E:DD:XX@wlan1: reassociating
02:02:43 wireless,info 00:12:F0:6E:DD:XX@wlan1: disconnected, ok
02:02:43 wireless,debug wlan1: 00:12:F0:6E:DD:XX not in local ACL, by default accept
02:02:43 wireless,info 00:12:F0:6E:DD:XX@wlan1: connected
02:02:46 wireless,debug wlan1: 00:12:F0:6E:DD:XX attempts to associate
02:02:46 wireless,info 00:12:F0:6E:DD:XX@wlan1: reassociating
02:07:15 wireless,debug wlan1: 00:12:F0:6E:DD:XX attempts to associate
02:07:15 wireless,debug wlan1: 00:12:F0:6E:DD:XX not in local ACL, by default accept
02:07:15 wireless,info 00:12:F0:6E:DD:XX@wlan1: connected