Community discussions

MUM Europe 2020
 
jarda
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 7604
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:46 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Jan 15, 2018 4:29 pm

How the kid control should work?
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 24337
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Jan 15, 2018 4:32 pm

Jarda https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Kid-control
Current implementation is very basic. In future content filter is planned or other features.
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
jarda
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 7604
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:46 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Jan 15, 2018 4:38 pm

Sorry for my stupidity, I couldn't imagine that you have already created a documentation wiki page for that. Thanks for the link, it looks promising.
 
parham
newbie
Posts: 32
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015 11:35 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Jan 15, 2018 6:46 pm

*) radius - increase allowed RADIUS server timeout to 60s;

Thanks, Guys.
 
User avatar
alexcherry
just joined
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:01 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Jan 15, 2018 6:57 pm

I checked to override with Radius remote user PPP profile ("Mikrotik-Group" attribute) - it works fine.
This is a nice feature that some people where asking for a long time. Now we can define several profiles and set different values there, such as speed per profile, queue type, different pool and then using Radius server say where PPPoE customer belongs.

There is one important option in PPPoE profile - Parent.
The question is how to setup the parent for Simple Queue correctly ? PPPoE queue of customer has a target <pppoe-test@connect>, what should be set to the Parent target ? Remember that it should be set there before any customer connects, because parent is a static queue.

The option is to set 0.0.0.0/0, but then, we can have only one parent per router, because if I add second parent, the 0.0.0.0/0 of previous one will take the whole traffic.

Here is an example, we have two parents, Regular and Business. There are two PPP server profiles, when customer is from business - he is set to Business profile and put under Business Parent Queue.

Picture - Image

Why this is nice to implement - because we can add Simple Queue to parents and according to Janis presentation, it should bring better performance on CCR routers with thousands of Simple queues.
Last edited by alexcherry on Mon Jan 15, 2018 8:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
alexcherry
just joined
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:01 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Jan 15, 2018 8:12 pm

Ok, guys, I have found the answer on my previous question. :-)
Final solution is not that automated as I wanted, but still better than nothing.

Instead of setting 0.0.0.0 to profiles we should do following :

1. Define different IP pool for profile. For example 192.168.101.0/24 - regular users, 192.168.250.0/24 - business users.
2. To parent I can set the range that corresponds to the pool. So, Business Parent queue Target = 192.168.250.0/24. Regular Parent Queue Target = 192.168.101.0/24.
3. I can define the speed limits for Plans inside PPP profile, or Radius can send it as Mikrotik-rate-limit attribute.
4. When PPPoE clients connect, Radius answers with "Mikrotik-Group" = business or "Mikrotik-Group" = regular and Queue is set under correct Partner.

Partner queue can have a Speed limitation - this will provide contention scenario, or Partner can be "unlimited", then Simple Queues will be just well balanced on CCR cores.

Picture : Image
 
User avatar
nz_monkey
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1825
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:53 pm
Location: Straya
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Jan 15, 2018 8:55 pm

*) dhcpv4-server - fixed framed and classless route received from RADIUS server;

What exactly was "fixed" ?
http://thebrotherswisp.com/ | Mikrotik MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCINE | Fortinet FTCNA, FCNSP, FCT | Extreme Networks ENA
 
User avatar
Alessio Garavano
Member
Member
Posts: 304
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 12:49 am
Location: Corrientes, Argentina
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Jan 16, 2018 8:28 am

BAD WIRELESS!!!

Tested in a SXT in "station-bridge" in production connected to a Sextant in "ap-bridge" mode and was lost :( tomorrow need to go physically to the tower to downgrade by ethernet... the SXT client is in Wireless-Protocol=nv2-nstreme, changed the Sextant AP to NV2 or Nstreme and no connect... In rc5 was the same and by the changelog this solve wireless problems and i take the risk... NOT SOLVED!
Alessio Garavano
http://www.isparg.com.ar
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8321
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Jan 16, 2018 12:48 pm

You mean, you're using RC versions on towers? Dude, you're crazy :D
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
th0massin0
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 144
Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 4:16 am
Location: Poland

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:57 pm

Dear Mikrotik Developers,
could you consider to support VirtIO-SCSI: ( viewtopic.php?f=15&t=124905&start=100#p626094 ), please?
 
msatter
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1342
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 12:56 am
Location: Netherlands / Nīderlande

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Jan 16, 2018 3:30 pm

I can confirm that on my 750Gr3 now the conversion from master-slave to bridge works, and that on L2TP/IPSEC now dail-on-demand/timeout is now respected.

Updated: "*) bridge - fixed hw-offload disabling for Mediatek and Realtek switches when STP/RSTP configured;"
upload speed through router is still 500 Mbit/s slower when STP/RSTP is activated on the Bridge
Two RB760iGS (hEX S) in series. One does PPPoE and both do IKEv2.
Running:
RouterOS 6.46 / Winbox 3.20 / MikroTik APP 1.3.9
Having an Android device, use https://github.com/M66B/NetGuard/releases (no root required)
 
User avatar
Alessio Garavano
Member
Member
Posts: 304
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 12:49 am
Location: Corrientes, Argentina
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Jan 16, 2018 5:34 pm

BAD WIRELESS!!!

Tested in a SXT in "station-bridge" in production connected to a Sextant in "ap-bridge" mode and was lost :( tomorrow need to go physically to the tower to downgrade by ethernet... the SXT client is in Wireless-Protocol=nv2-nstreme, changed the Sextant AP to NV2 or Nstreme and no connect... In rc5 was the same and by the changelog this solve wireless problems and i take the risk... NOT SOLVED!
UPDATE: Nstreme work fine... i add the "Management Protection Key" of the Sextant AP to the SXT station and connect OK with Nstreme... NV2 is not working!
Alessio Garavano
http://www.isparg.com.ar
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 1413
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Jan 16, 2018 5:51 pm

You should never have queue with target 0.0.0.0/0. Such queue can limit traffic for specific IP only on one direction (upload and download is limited only by download limit) because every IP goes under 0.0.0.0/0 so queue does not know which is download and which is upload. For example, traffic between x.x.x.x and y.y.y.y will be always matched by this queue under download since x.x.x.x and y.y.y.y is under 0.0.0.0/0. If you set target as x.x.x.x then queue will know that if source address is x.x.x.x, then it is upload and if x.x.x.x is destination, then it is download.
 
andriys
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1192
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 1:59 pm
Location: Kharkiv, Ukraine

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Jan 16, 2018 5:57 pm

Updated: "*) bridge - fixed hw-offload disabling for Mediatek and Realtek switches when STP/RSTP configured;"
upload speed through router is still 500 Mbit/s slower when STP/RSTP is activated on the Bridge
That's as expected since hw-offloaded STP/RSTP is not supported on Realtek, Mediatek and ICPlus175D switches: https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:S ... Offloading. As I understand when you enable STP/RSTP on one of these switches the hw-offload should automatically be turned off, but that didn't happen before, and now they fixed that.
 
idlemind
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1108
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2017 11:15 pm
Location: USA

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Jan 16, 2018 9:33 pm

*) dhcpv6-client - added info exchange support;
*) dhcpv6-client - added support for options 15 and 16;
*) dhcpv6-server - added DHCPv4 style user options;
While it is a worthy mention and any improvement in DHCPv6 support is welcome I feel it is important to remind you that your team is sorely lacking in this area from even a residential router perspective. Look at how OpenWRT / LEDE implements DNSMASQ in LUCI for a valuable interface. We need to be allow per server instance to set the network bits used, aka VLAN11 should always be provider::/56 ending in 11 like provider11::/64, this implies nesting or parent/child functionality that is currently not allowed with your pool system. Additionally, the DHCPv6 server needs to support client address allocation before it is useful. In parallel the SLAAC implementation should not parrot the upstream DNS servers, instead the administrator should be able to set their own. If I use your SLAAC implementation it results in all of my IPv6 DNS queries, which could be a single stack area of my network, not being cached.
 
Grickos
newbie
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 2:57 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Jan 16, 2018 11:53 pm

I have a strange problem.
PPPoe connectivity to ISP modem.
Local devices can not connect to the web site IP address 185.58.74.135 which hosts for a larger number of sites. It can be checked which pages do not work with reverse ip (for example, https://www.ipneighbour.com)

The ROS 6.39.3 version works ok.
The Ros 6.41 and 6.42RC does not work.
Other sites work normally. I do not know if something else site does not work.
 
liviu2004
just joined
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 10:22 pm
Location: Rotterdam

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Jan 17, 2018 8:32 am

My site does not work either, I have a created a topic for that.
 
Grickos
newbie
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 2:57 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Jan 17, 2018 11:14 pm

No feedback what's wrong with pppoe.?
It's not a problem for a RC release, but a current. Especially at this point, Downgrade is not simply because of the implementation bridge.
This is the main thing about roter, website review. it is not a special possibility. Some hosting does not open, they which have about 100 websites.
My production is at 6.39.3, so it's not terrible. At work and at home in newer versions.
Tnx liviu2004 on the topic, I thought something was wrong with me.

Best regards.
Sorry for bad English
 
User avatar
soonwai
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:50 pm
Location: Kuala Lumpur

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 18, 2018 7:32 am

No feedback what's wrong with pppoe.?
It's not a problem for a RC release, but a current. Especially at this point, Downgrade is not simply because of the implementation bridge.
This is the main thing about roter, website review. it is not a special possibility. Some hosting does not open, they which have about 100 websites.
My production is at 6.39.3, so it's not terrible. At work and at home in newer versions.
Tnx liviu2004 on the topic, I thought something was wrong with me.

Best regards.
Sorry for bad English
I tested and have the same problem. Test done with veritas.hr 185.58.74.135. IPv4 only.
RB750Gr3 6.42rc6: Website does not load
Mobile data on my smartphone: Website loads OK

Another shared host website, rtcs.com.my, loads fine.
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8321
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 18, 2018 9:02 am

6.41, sites from https://www.ipneighbour.com/#/lookup/185.58.74.135 list open normally. What error do you see?
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
Grickos
newbie
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 2:57 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 18, 2018 5:13 pm

The list opens normally, the web pages on that list do not open. For example, the web Page pupilla.hr, boletus.hr ...
Just through the Mikrotik pppoe connection is a problem. "Status do not get off of "syn sent"
I have print logs, but the liviu2004 explained everything in his topic.
( I have a backup connection, pppoe on the router ISP, a Mikrotik connected via Lan to that router. . so the company that has to have access to one page has redirected it.)
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 18, 2018 6:23 pm

New RC version released

What's new in 6.42rc11 (2018-Jan-18 12:42):

*) bridge - fixed IGMP Snooping after disabling/enabling bridge;
*) bridge - fixed allowed MSTI priority values;
*) certificate - do not use utf8 for SCEP challange password;
*) chr - automaticly generate new systemID on first startup;
*) crs326 - fixed possible packet leaking from CPU to switch ports;
*) dhcpv4-server - added "dns-none" option to "/ip dhcp-server network dns";
*) dhcpv6-client - implement confirm after reboot;
*) filesystem - fixed situations when "/flash" directory lost files after upgrade;
*) ipsec - fixed AES-CTR and AES-GCM support on RB1200;
*) kidcontrol - added initial support for "/ip kid-control" feature;
*) ppp - changed default value of "route-distance" to 1;
*) ppp - fixed change-mss funcionality in some specific traffic (introduced in v6.41);
*) webfig - fixed MAC address ordering;
*) webfig - fixed wireless snooper address, SSID and other column ordering;
*) winbox - added "dhcp-option-set" to DHCP server;
*) winbox - added "insert-queue-before" to DHCP server;
*) winbox - added DHCPv6 client info request type and updated statuses;
*) winbox - show Bridge Port PVID column by default;
*) wireless - fixed nv2 (introduced in v6.42rc);
 
User avatar
soonwai
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:50 pm
Location: Kuala Lumpur

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 18, 2018 6:43 pm

The list opens normally, the web pages on that list do not open. For example, the web Page pupilla.hr, boletus.hr ...
Just through the Mikrotik pppoe connection is a problem. "Status do not get off of "syn sent"
I have print logs, but the liviu2004 explained everything in his topic.
( I have a backup connection, pppoe on the router ISP, a Mikrotik connected via Lan to that router. . so the company that has to have access to one page has redirected it.)
It's OK now with rc11. Tried veritas.hr, pupilla.hr and boletus.hr. All loading ok.

I guess this fixed it:
*) ppp - fixed change-mss funcionality in some specific traffic (introduced in v6.41);
 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 5989
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 18, 2018 7:19 pm

*) ppp - fixed change-mss funcionality in some specific traffic (introduced in v6.41);
Please give a bit more detail and/or workaround for this issue. Can it be fixed by removing change-mss in PPP and adding a change-mss firewall mangle rule?
When will 6.41.1 be released to fix it?
 
msatter
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1342
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 12:56 am
Location: Netherlands / Nīderlande

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 18, 2018 8:13 pm

What could have been changed?!
RC9: *) ppp - changed default value of "route-distance" to 1;
RC11: *) ppp - changed default value of "route-distance" to 1;

Indeed it is really time to roll-out 6.41.1
Last edited by msatter on Thu Jan 18, 2018 8:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Two RB760iGS (hEX S) in series. One does PPPoE and both do IKEv2.
Running:
RouterOS 6.46 / Winbox 3.20 / MikroTik APP 1.3.9
Having an Android device, use https://github.com/M66B/NetGuard/releases (no root required)
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 18, 2018 8:22 pm

*) ppp - fixed change-mss funcionality in some specific traffic (introduced in v6.41);
Please give a bit more detail and/or workaround for this issue. Can it be fixed by removing change-mss in PPP and adding a change-mss firewall mangle rule?
When will 6.41.1 be released to fix it?
Yes. You can add change mss mangle rules manually to fix the problem, you don't need to turn off setting in ppp profile.
 
msatter
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1342
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 12:56 am
Location: Netherlands / Nīderlande

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 18, 2018 8:52 pm

I have now some new behaviour (RC11) when using when using /IP-firewall-Mangle-Extra-Dst. Address Type.

I used here Address Type "!-local" to exclude the local addresses even it was not on the router itself but directly connected to one port. I have now to include the complete local address range to have it working as before. I use that to decide if a address is in the local network or the WAN and now I have to filter extra on 192.168.88.0/24 to make that decision.

It is now working as in the WiKi manual so I have to do more than before.

UPDATE:

I am back and while investigating why the above did not work any more my router disappeared, not literal but from my network, and I had to restore what was not possible because it wanted a password that was not there and was not needed. [Ticket#2018011822005351]

I went back to 6.40.5, never got a stable 6.41, and build-up from that back to 6.42.RC9 and there also "local" worked again.

The crash was my fault and I was looking at /IP addresses and noticed the line "192.168.88.1/24 192.168.88.0 bridge1" and I removed the "/24" because the Network was stated.....bye bye connection and so router and up to a reset config. DON'T TRY THIS AT HOME OR WORK!!

So the workings of "local" changed in RC11 .

[Ticket#2018011822005351] has now been resolved and it was an error on my side that I missed to hit the checkbox "Don't Encrypt" that time. Potential to avoid this confusing is still there in the graphical interface so that when you miss to click you know what is going to happen.
Last edited by msatter on Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Two RB760iGS (hEX S) in series. One does PPPoE and both do IKEv2.
Running:
RouterOS 6.46 / Winbox 3.20 / MikroTik APP 1.3.9
Having an Android device, use https://github.com/M66B/NetGuard/releases (no root required)
 
Grickos
newbie
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 2:57 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 18, 2018 9:59 pm

The list opens normally, the web pages on that list do not open. For example, the web Page pupilla.hr, boletus.hr ...
Just through the Mikrotik pppoe connection is a problem. "Status do not get off of "syn sent"
I have print logs, but the liviu2004 explained everything in his topic.
( I have a backup connection, pppoe on the router ISP, a Mikrotik connected via Lan to that router. . so the company that has to have access to one page has redirected it.)
It's OK now with rc11. Tried veritas.hr, pupilla.hr and boletus.hr. All loading ok.

I guess this fixed it:
*) ppp - fixed change-mss funcionality in some specific traffic (introduced in v6.41);
Yes, I saw that fix, everything is okay now.
 
Grickos
newbie
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 2:57 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 18, 2018 10:22 pm

One thing has not worked on Winbox for a long time.
If you set Schedule "Start Time = Startup", Next Run shows ok. If you change your mind and put it for example "Start Time = 00:04:00" "Interval = 1d 00:00:00". "Next Run" shows some strange time.
The only way to gain proper time is to create a new Schedule or set time in Terminal. The terminal works fine.
 
msatter
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1342
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 12:56 am
Location: Netherlands / Nīderlande

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:56 pm

Did anyone else noticed a change (6.42.RC11) in behaviour of the Address Type: "local" as described in posting: viewtopic.php?f=21&t=129034&start=50#p637725?
Two RB760iGS (hEX S) in series. One does PPPoE and both do IKEv2.
Running:
RouterOS 6.46 / Winbox 3.20 / MikroTik APP 1.3.9
Having an Android device, use https://github.com/M66B/NetGuard/releases (no root required)
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8321
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:10 pm

Did anyone else noticed a change (6.42.RC11) in behaviour of the Address Type: "local" as described in posting: viewtopic.php?f=21&t=129034&start=50#p637725?
dst-address-type=local should not catch addresses from local network. it should work just as described in docs: "local - if dst-address is assigned to one of router's interfaces"

https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:I ... all/Filter
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
anuser
Member
Member
Posts: 408
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2014 7:27 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:39 pm

Version 6.42rc5 has been released.
:
*) capsman - improved CAPsMAN responsiveness on systems with large amount of CAP interfaces;
:
How many CAP interfaces are we talking about?
 
zajadacz
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2016 12:30 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Jan 20, 2018 12:04 am

*) kidcontrol - added initial support for "/ip kid-control" feature (CLI only);
Why are you working on a new features that are not very important for Mikrotik users (there is firewall which can do much more for experienced users) and you are not fixing existing important issues? When you will solve a problem with with wireless compatibility for low-end client devices? viewtopic.php?f=7&t=102908#p618041
 
biatche
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 6:50 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:48 am

*) kidcontrol - added initial support for "/ip kid-control" feature (CLI only);
Why are you working on a new features that are not very important for Mikrotik users (there is firewall which can do much more for experienced users) and you are not fixing existing important issues? When you will solve a problem with with wireless compatibility for low-end client devices? viewtopic.php?f=7&t=102908#p618041
Yah I was wondering about that too. I'm sure Amazon are very much looking forward to flashing the latest RC so they can have kid control.

Could work on things like LACP with hardware offload.

and allow-signal-out-of-range for capsman............................... critically....... important.............................................
 
msatter
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1342
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 12:56 am
Location: Netherlands / Nīderlande

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Jan 20, 2018 10:58 am

Did anyone else noticed a change (6.42.RC11) in behaviour of the Address Type: "local" as described in posting: viewtopic.php?f=21&t=129034&start=50#p637725?
dst-address-type=local should not catch addresses from local network. it should work just as described in docs: "local - if dst-address is assigned to one of router's interfaces"

https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:I ... all/Filter
It was not mentioned in the RC11 release notes and it good that Mikrotik fixed this because this discrepancy between the docs and reality has been present in at least 6.40 and 6.41 and up to 6.42RC9.
Two RB760iGS (hEX S) in series. One does PPPoE and both do IKEv2.
Running:
RouterOS 6.46 / Winbox 3.20 / MikroTik APP 1.3.9
Having an Android device, use https://github.com/M66B/NetGuard/releases (no root required)
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8321
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Jan 20, 2018 12:41 pm

It was not mentioned in the RC11 release notes and it good that Mikrotik fixed this because this discrepancy between the docs and reality has been present in at least 6.40 and 6.41 and up to 6.42RC9.
Can't confirm on 6.41:
/ip firewall filter
add action=accept chain=output dst-address-type=local log=yes
Router pings itself (192.168.88.1/24) - packets are in log.
Router pings its neighbour (192.168.88.8) - no logging. So, in 6.41 dst-address-type=local also works as expected.
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
msatter
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1342
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 12:56 am
Location: Netherlands / Nīderlande

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Jan 20, 2018 4:16 pm

It was not mentioned in the RC11 release notes and it good that Mikrotik fixed this because this discrepancy between the docs and reality has been present in at least 6.40 and 6.41 and up to 6.42RC9.
Can't confirm on 6.41:
/ip firewall filter
add action=accept chain=output dst-address-type=local log=yes
Router pings itself (192.168.88.1/24) - packets are in log.
Router pings its neighbour (192.168.88.8) - no logging. So, in 6.41 dst-address-type=local also works as expected.
/ip firewall mangle
add action=mark-connection chain=prerouting comment="VPN connection mark" connection-mark=no-mark \
    dst-address-type=!local dst-port=80,443 new-connection-mark=VPN1 passthrough=yes \
    per-connection-classifier=src-port:2/0 protocol=tcp src-address-list=PrivateVPN
        add action=mark-connection chain=prerouting comment="VPN connection mark" connection-mark=no-mark \
    dst-address-type=!local dst-port=80,443 new-connection-mark=VPN2 passthrough=yes \
    per-connection-classifier=src-port:2/1 protocol=tcp src-address-list=PrivateVPN
And the line above does not catch local traffic in RC9 but in RC11 it does. My computer (on the PrivateVPN list) goes to a local device with a webpage on port 80 (non HTTPS) and in RC11 it is marked as traffic that has to go through the VPN.

To make this future proof I am going to add the local network to the address list that unmarks connections that should not go through the VPN.

Update: I have now installed RC11 again and it works now correctly. All dst-address-type=local are now not more present in that part of Mangle so that won't bother me again.

Why it now works and the previous time is still an mystery to me and also why one line underneath needed extra filters to work despite they where not needed. Now it goes correctly as in the manual.
Two RB760iGS (hEX S) in series. One does PPPoE and both do IKEv2.
Running:
RouterOS 6.46 / Winbox 3.20 / MikroTik APP 1.3.9
Having an Android device, use https://github.com/M66B/NetGuard/releases (no root required)
 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 5989
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Jan 20, 2018 7:01 pm

*) kidcontrol - added initial support for "/ip kid-control" feature (CLI only);
Why are you working on a new features that are not very important for Mikrotik users (there is firewall which can do much more for experienced users) and you are not fixing existing important issues?
I always hope (or try to fool myself?) that silly things like kid-control or "detect internet" are assignments for a trainee or graduate, and the normal staff is working on the important stuff (or maybe even on version 7!).
Indeed it would be a shame when time that would otherwise be spent on important stuff is instead wasted on these things...
 
mistry7
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1361
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:57 am
Location: Germany

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Jan 20, 2018 10:41 pm

*) kidcontrol - added initial support for "/ip kid-control" feature (CLI only);
Why are you working on a new features that are not very important for Mikrotik users (there is firewall which can do much more for experienced users) and you are not fixing existing important issues?
I always hope (or try to fool myself?) that silly things like kid-control or "detect internet" are assignments for a trainee or graduate, and the normal staff is working on the important stuff (or maybe even on version 7!).
Indeed it would be a shame when time that would otherwise be spent on important stuff is instead wasted on these things...
What you see is product focus on home router, cheap home router, not at wisp wireless anymore....
If WISP is in focus we had this features before 2016:
- Spectral scan
- GPS Sync
- working NV2 or NV3
 
dadoremix
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 119
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 11:31 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Jan 20, 2018 11:25 pm

Make some app
To controll 100+ mikrotik os remote
Like ubiquiti have
Dude is not that app
I can upgrade via dude
But how i can pull backup?
One click? No
Maybe with massive script, bum im not programer
 
msatter
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1342
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 12:56 am
Location: Netherlands / Nīderlande

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Jan 20, 2018 11:46 pm

I only know this APP viewtopic.php?t=98407 and not the Dude APP you mention.
Two RB760iGS (hEX S) in series. One does PPPoE and both do IKEv2.
Running:
RouterOS 6.46 / Winbox 3.20 / MikroTik APP 1.3.9
Having an Android device, use https://github.com/M66B/NetGuard/releases (no root required)
 
Nando_lavras
newbie
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 4:38 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Jan 22, 2018 2:36 pm


Since 6.41:

- bridge - fixed hw-offload disabling when adding a port with "horizon" set;


I've tried with the last 6.42RC11 in a CRS326, when i add a port with horizon=1 this port not activate the hw-offload, this is correct? I trying to isolate all ports, all the ports have to communicate only with the uplink port, but without loosing the hw-offload.

Fernando.
 
anuser
Member
Member
Posts: 408
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2014 7:27 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Jan 22, 2018 3:10 pm

Is there any difference between 6.42rc11 and 6.41 concerning wifi? Reason I ask: Today I tested with one customer and a smartphone with Android 7.0 He was standing in front of one wAP AC with 6.41. Signal was -61db. It used the 2.4Ghz band. He was able to connect and was thrown out of the access point after some seconds/minutes. According to the CAPSMAN controller, the reason was: "disconnected, too weak signal" I updated the wAP AC to 6.42rc11 and he´s now surfing without any problems since 40 minutes.
 
TestCRS
just joined
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 4:49 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Jan 22, 2018 5:02 pm

Please inform about your plans,
when will work LACP with hardware offload in RouterOS (on crs 317)?
Depends on your answer, we will buy your equipment or not.
Thank you.
 
biatche
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 6:50 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Jan 22, 2018 7:26 pm

Please inform about your plans,
when will work LACP with hardware offload in RouterOS (on crs 317)?
Depends on your answer, we will buy your equipment or not.
Thank you.
Yeah been waiting for it too, but they could be busy working on other extremely important enterprise features like kid control.
Last edited by biatche on Tue Jan 23, 2018 1:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
JimmyNyholm
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2016 2:16 am
Location: Sweden

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Jan 22, 2018 8:56 pm

HW LACP is must.
 
klaus007
just joined
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:11 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Jan 22, 2018 10:37 pm

I'm also waiting for this feature!!
 
JimmyNyholm
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2016 2:16 am
Location: Sweden

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Jan 22, 2018 11:15 pm

HW LACP is must.
[Ticket#2018012222005306] RE: LACP HW CRS317-1G-16 [...]
 
JimmyNyholm
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2016 2:16 am
Location: Sweden

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Jan 22, 2018 11:17 pm

I would love VLan Translation on CRS317-1G-16S+RM as well... when can vi se that?
 
uldis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 3427
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 2:55 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Jan 23, 2018 9:02 am

Version 6.42rc5 has been released.
:
*) capsman - improved CAPsMAN responsiveness on systems with large amount of CAP interfaces;
:
How many CAP interfaces are we talking about?
More than 100 CAPs.
 
JimmyNyholm
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2016 2:16 am
Location: Sweden

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Jan 23, 2018 10:34 am

HW LACP is must.
[Ticket#2018012222005306] RE: LACP HW CRS317-1G-16 [...]
Hello,

We are currently working on this feature. We hope to see it soon.

Best regards,
Arturs C.

--
MikroTik.com

Come to the MUM conferences, registration open in Cameroon, Kenya, Russia (Ekaterinburg), Russia (St. Petersburg), Europe (Berlin), Australia, New Zealand! https://mum.mikrotik.com/
Got reply from support that they are working on and trying to release soon... That feels like a message all would like to hear.....
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 1413
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Jan 23, 2018 3:45 pm

Version 6.42rc12 has been released.

Changes since previous release:

*) bridge - fixed "mst-override" export;
*) chr - added "open-vm-tools" on VMware installations;
*) chr - added "qemu-guest-agent" on KVM installations;
*) chr - added "xe-daemon" on Xen installations;
*) chr - fixed interface naming order when adding more that 4 interfaces on VMware installations;
*) chr - fixed suspend on Xen installations;
*) chr - make additional disks visible under "/disk" on Xen installations;
*) chr - make virtio disks visible under "/disk" on KVM installations;
*) dhcpv6-server - added DHCPv4 style user options (CLI only);
*) interface - improved interface configuration responsiveness;
*) ippool - added ability to specify comment (CLI only);
*) kidcontrol - added initial support for "/ip kid-control" feature;
*) ppp - fixed change-mss functionality in some specific traffic (introduced in v6.41);
*) quickset - properly detect LTE interface on startup;
*) routerboard - added RouterBOOT "auto-upgrade" after RouterOS upgrade (extra reboot required) (CLI only);
*) snmp - added "/caps-man interface print oid";
*) snmp - improved request processing performance for wireless and CAP interfaces;
*) wireless - fixed "wds-slave" channel selection when single frequency is specified;

If you experience version related issues, then please send supout file from your router to support@mikrotik.com. File must be generated while router is not working as expected or after crash.
 
th0massin0
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 144
Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 4:16 am
Location: Poland

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Jan 23, 2018 4:49 pm

Does booting from VirtIO-SCSI supported?
 
anuser
Member
Member
Posts: 408
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2014 7:27 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Jan 23, 2018 5:01 pm

Version 6.42rc5 has been released.
:
*) capsman - improved CAPsMAN responsiveness on systems with large amount of CAP interfaces;
:
How many CAP interfaces are we talking about?
More than 100 CAPs.
I setup a new controller (coming from the CHR release) with an RB1100AHX4 and put new CAPs (wAP AC, HAP AC, HAP AC lite) on the controller, step by step. After nearly 3 days without any problem,
I experienced my first problems again today, i.e. the controller lost the connection to all of the CAPs concurrently.

- The RB1100AHX4 is monitored from two different probes (10s ping) within my network. There was no single loss to it. My monitoring was able pull all information with SNMP. No connection loss here.
- RouterOS version on RB1100AHX4: 6.41
- RouterOS version on CAPs: 6.42rc11
- sessions displayed on RB1100AHX4 when right before the loss: ~23000
- amount of clients connected on all CAP right before the loss: 723
- CPU load on RB1100AHX4 right before the loss: CPU1: 25%, CPU2: 38%, CPU3: 19%, CPU4: 19%
- Amount of CAPS: 46
- Amount of CAP interfaces displayed within CAPSMAN => CP Interfaces: 268 (we have multiple SSIDs on 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz)
----> That´s the critical 100 "CAP interface barrier" I assume?

All CAPs tell me within their logs: "CAP connect to MikroTik (::ffff:....) failed: timeout
The CAPSMAN controller tells me for each CAP: "caps,debug [::ffff:.....,Run,[6C:3B:6B:B7:01:95]] lost connection, keepalive timeout"

So will 6.42rc11 running on the RB1100AHX4 help?
(I had those issues as well on a the CHR version before with ~80 CAPs and it didn´t matter what CPU cores I used, going from 2 core up to 16, the controller lost its connection to the CAPs)
 
planetcoop
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 2:32 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Jan 23, 2018 6:53 pm

Updated my btest CHR to 6.42rc12 with legit open-vmware-tools.... So nice to suspend or gracefully shutdown a CHR.
 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 5989
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Jan 23, 2018 7:26 pm

*) chr - added "open-vm-tools" on VMware installations;
HOORAY!!! finally!
 
User avatar
Cha0s
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 916
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 4:53 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Jan 23, 2018 8:18 pm

*) routerboard - added RouterBOOT "auto-upgrade" after RouterOS upgrade (extra reboot required) (CLI only);
What's the point if we have to do an extra reboot?
The whole point of a feature like this would be to update both ROS and RouterBOOT with one reboot.
 
mervincm
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 55
Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 10:02 pm
Location: Canada

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Jan 24, 2018 1:26 am

Any hope outstanding for hardware LACP bonded links on CRS226? been waiting for years!
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 1413
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Jan 24, 2018 7:41 am

As many other features, also "auto-upgrade" is only in rc state and is still work on progress.
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8321
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Jan 24, 2018 8:40 am

*) chr - make virtio disks visible under "/disk" on KVM installations;
So, is it possible now to run CHR on Google Cloud Platform?..
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
uldis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 3427
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 2:55 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Jan 24, 2018 10:54 am

Version 6.42rc5 has been released.
:
*) capsman - improved CAPsMAN responsiveness on systems with large amount of CAP interfaces;
:
How many CAP interfaces are we talking about?
More than 100 CAPs.
I setup a new controller (coming from the CHR release) with an RB1100AHX4 and put new CAPs (wAP AC, HAP AC, HAP AC lite) on the controller, step by step. After nearly 3 days without any problem,
I experienced my first problems again today, i.e. the controller lost the connection to all of the CAPs concurrently.

- The RB1100AHX4 is monitored from two different probes (10s ping) within my network. There was no single loss to it. My monitoring was able pull all information with SNMP. No connection loss here.
- RouterOS version on RB1100AHX4: 6.41
- RouterOS version on CAPs: 6.42rc11
- sessions displayed on RB1100AHX4 when right before the loss: ~23000
- amount of clients connected on all CAP right before the loss: 723
- CPU load on RB1100AHX4 right before the loss: CPU1: 25%, CPU2: 38%, CPU3: 19%, CPU4: 19%
- Amount of CAPS: 46
- Amount of CAP interfaces displayed within CAPSMAN => CP Interfaces: 268 (we have multiple SSIDs on 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz)
----> That´s the critical 100 "CAP interface barrier" I assume?

All CAPs tell me within their logs: "CAP connect to MikroTik (::ffff:....) failed: timeout
The CAPSMAN controller tells me for each CAP: "caps,debug [::ffff:.....,Run,[6C:3B:6B:B7:01:95]] lost connection, keepalive timeout"

So will 6.42rc11 running on the RB1100AHX4 help?
(I had those issues as well on a the CHR version before with ~80 CAPs and it didn´t matter what CPU cores I used, going from 2 core up to 16, the controller lost its connection to the CAPs)
The fix should be applied on the CAPsMAN.
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 1413
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Jan 24, 2018 3:10 pm

Version 6.42rc14 has been released.

Changes since previous release:

*) bridge - fixed ARP option changing on bridge (introduced v6.41);
*) bridge - fixed VLAN filtering when "use-ip-firewall" is enabled (introduced in v6.41);
*) certificate - added PKCS#10 version check;
*) certificate - dropped DES support and added AES instead for SCEP;
*) certificate - dropped MD5 support and require SHA1 as minimum for SCEP;
*) certificate - fixed PKCS#10 version;
*) netinstall - improved LTE package description;
*) ovpn - fixed resource leak on systems with high CPU usage;
*) ppp - added initial support for NETGEAR AC340U and ZyXEL WAH1604;
*) rb433/rb450 - fixed port flapping on bridged Ethernet interfaces if hw-offload is enabled (introduced in v6.41);
*) routerboard - added RouterBOOT "auto-upgrade" after RouterOS upgrade (extra reboot required) (CLI only);
*) userman - added support for ARM and MMIPS platforms;
*) wireless - improved packet processing on ARM platform devices;
*) wireless - improved wireless scan functionality for devices with multiple wireless interfaces;

If you experience version related issues, then please send supout file from your router to support@mikrotik.com. File must be generated while router is not working as expected or after crash.

Note: if SCEP and CAPsMAN is used, make sure to upgrade clients first, only then upgrade server side. Otherwise after server upgrade old clients will not be able to get certificates.
 
dasvos
newbie
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2015 7:10 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Jan 24, 2018 3:22 pm

Userman for ARM? Thank you Mikrotik.

Sent from my WAS-LX1 using Tapatalk

 
evince
Member
Member
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 12:11 pm
Location: Weiswampach - Luxemburg
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Jan 24, 2018 6:24 pm

irghost, raffav, Cha0s - Seems that we have found an issue with new TLS matcher. We will try to fix it as soon as possible;
v6.42rc14, and still not working
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 1413
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Jan 24, 2018 8:04 pm

evince - Have you opened support ticket regarding this issue? We have not received any more complaints that this option would not work and have not experienced any more issues with it in our lab.
 
MartijnVdS
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 93
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2014 9:36 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Jan 24, 2018 10:02 pm

Note: if SCEP and CAPsMAN is used, make sure to upgrade clients first, only then upgrade server side. Otherwise after server upgrade old clients will not be able to get certificates.
Does the basic "request a certificate" option in CAPsMAN use SCEP? Or does that use something else?
 
mistry7
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1361
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:57 am
Location: Germany

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Jan 24, 2018 10:03 pm

*) userman - added support for ARM and MMIPS platforms;

a miracle after 3 years
 
biatche
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 6:50 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Jan 24, 2018 11:35 pm

The new "/interface wireless access-list allow-signal-out-of-range" feature in 6.41 dramatically improved roaming wireless clients' connectivity. Thanks! Is it possible to add this functionality to "/caps-man access-list" as well? I am getting quite a few too-strong and too-weak disconnects on CAP managed APs:
12:32:29 caps,info XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX@cap6 connected 
12:32:32 caps,info XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX@cap6 disconnected, too strong signal 
12:32:37 caps,info XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX@cap6 connected 
12:32:41 caps,info XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX@cap6 reassociating 
12:32:41 caps,info XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX@cap6 connected 
12:32:53 caps,info XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX@cap6 disconnected, too strong signal 
12:32:56 caps,info XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX@cap6 connected 
12:32:59 caps,info XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX@cap6 disconnected, too weak signal
i emailed support and they said they don't plan on adding this feature for capsman. so they find this important for wireless but not capsman. very 'logical' right?
 
huntah
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 3:24 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 25, 2018 12:26 am

I am very glad Mikrotk is working on Certificates. I dont use SCEP but rather more and more popular LetsEncypt (hotstpot, SSTP and IKEv2 VPN !).
I would be great if Mikrotik could implement something like acme.sh . I have used this guide https://www.ollegustafsson.com/en/letsencrypt-routeros/
to automate renew, upload and install the certificates but its quite a hassle.
Wouldn't it be great if we could just have someting like this:
/system certificates add type=LE hostname=remote.mikrotik.com challenge=DNS-manual services=SSL hotspot=profile1 ipsec-peer="name of the peer"
MK would create an ACME challenge and we would put it simply in our DNS:
Domain: '_acme-challenge.remote.mikrotik.com'
TXT value: 'ddasdLAoGgAtZYSGIodasudsw4fdsNhvCNd1qnu0cdmnE'

For me this means:
1.No need for dedicated linux machine:
2. No need to SSH RSA login
3. No need for scheduled task to import any new certs

I think that for majority of us it would be enough ACME DNS manual challange.

Just a suggestion because you are in the middle of Certificate updates :)
I know this is not exatcly related to 6.42RC but I think it is on the point what would many of us need!
 
td32
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 92
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2016 5:55 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 25, 2018 12:36 am

*) userman - added support for ARM and MMIPS platforms;

a miracle after 3 years
what a news...
so next step: support EAP
 
dmingo
just joined
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:06 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 25, 2018 2:08 am

Hello:
For Mk support.
Very low performance in nv2 (10Mbps), 802.11 (> 100Mbps) ok
Bandwidht Test (TCP) Mk Link PtP 2.1Km Model: LHG5 ac arm(IPQ4019)
Regards.
Last edited by dmingo on Thu Jan 25, 2018 2:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
typicalwisp
just joined
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2018 8:45 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 25, 2018 2:19 am

The new "/interface wireless access-list allow-signal-out-of-range" feature in 6.41 dramatically improved roaming wireless clients' connectivity.
i emailed support and they said they don't plan on adding this feature for capsman. so they find this important for wireless but not capsman. very 'logical' right?

Hopefully, there was a misunderstanding. I suppose they could fix the bugs related to signal strength calculations instead of adding allow-signal-out-of-range. Obviously, I don't have clients connecting at above 120dBm (1,000 Mega Watt) even though we regularly see disconnects for "too strong signal."

These bugs make caps-man virtually useless for 802.11 clients. Modern OS wireless drivers often auto-reconnect, but older ones stay disconnected when the AP sends a de-auth frame. This is fine when the clients go out of range, but my customers have multiple devices less than 6 meters from an access point disconnecting and reconnecting because of "too strong/weak signal." In the logs I copied it was the same non-moving device for all the log entries.

I assume that Mikrotik is working on something to mitigate the signal issue in access-list. I'm not picky about how it gets fixed. If there is anything I can do to speed this along, please let me know.
 
biatche
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 6:50 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 25, 2018 3:38 am

The new "/interface wireless access-list allow-signal-out-of-range" feature in 6.41 dramatically improved roaming wireless clients' connectivity.
i emailed support and they said they don't plan on adding this feature for capsman. so they find this important for wireless but not capsman. very 'logical' right?

Hopefully, there was a misunderstanding. I suppose they could fix the bugs related to signal strength calculations instead of adding allow-signal-out-of-range. Obviously, I don't have clients connecting at above 120dBm (1,000 Mega Watt) even though we regularly see disconnects for "too strong signal."

These bugs make caps-man virtually useless for 802.11 clients. Modern OS wireless drivers often auto-reconnect, but older ones stay disconnected when the AP sends a de-auth frame. This is fine when the clients go out of range, but my customers have multiple devices less than 6 meters from an access point disconnecting and reconnecting because of "too strong/weak signal." In the logs I copied it was the same non-moving device for all the log entries.

I assume that Mikrotik is working on something to mitigate the signal issue in access-list. I'm not picky about how it gets fixed. If there is anything I can do to speed this along, please let me know.
in our email conversation, they mentioned they want logs. maybe you could provide that. although i have a huge complaint about logs. it doesnt mention signal strength. i wish they'd consider linux type logs instead of windows type logs. logs should have useful detailed information and not just "signal too strong/weak"
 
jondavy
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 11:14 pm
Location: Brasil

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 25, 2018 4:13 am

PPPoE server does not work on VLAN interfaces when cpe (customer) is of another brand that is not mikrotik
 
User avatar
typicalwisp
just joined
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2018 8:45 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 25, 2018 5:31 am

Here is the config from one controller:
/caps-man access-list
# Main rule to allow strong clients to have a high-speed connection
add action=accept ap-tx-limit=40000000 client-tx-limit=10000000 interface=all signal-range=-80..120
# Rule to prevent clients on the fringe from using 100% of the radio bandwidth
add action=accept ap-tx-limit=500000 client-tx-limit=500000 interface=all signal-range=-87..-80
add action=accept ap-tx-limit=200000 client-tx-limit=200000 interface=all signal-range=-120..-88
# Catch-all rule to test if there is a bug in signal-range matching code
add action=accept ap-tx-limit=100000 client-tx-limit=100000 interface=all signal-range=-120..120
# Catch-all rule to see if a rule without signal-range still checks the signal... it does
add action=accept ap-tx-limit=100000 client-tx-limit=100000 interface=all

Recent logs... I am pretty sure there aren't any client devices capable of 1 GigaWatt.
jan/24 17:49:06 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 17:49:14 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 17:49:25 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 17:50:02 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 17:51:53 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 17:53:58 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 17:58:45 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:11@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 17:59:52 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:11@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 18:00:09 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 18:11:29 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 18:12:31 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 18:28:02 caps,info EC:88:92:XX:XX:F1@cap20 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 18:28:10 caps,info EC:88:92:XX:XX:F1@cap21 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 18:33:27 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:11@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 18:43:38 caps,info D0:22:BE:XX:XX:30@cap21 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 18:43:54 caps,info D0:22:BE:XX:XX:30@cap21 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 18:43:57 caps,info 90:68:C3:XX:XX:4A@cap12 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 18:55:41 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:11@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 18:57:32 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 19:06:20 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:11@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 19:06:24 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:11@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 19:38:43 caps,info F8:62:14:XX:XX:60@cap20 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 19:46:13 caps,info E4:58:E7:XX:XX:D0@cap10 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 19:47:10 caps,info 30:10:B3:XX:XX:60@cap12 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 19:55:38 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:11@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 20:01:54 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:11@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 20:13:45 caps,info F8:62:14:XX:XX:60@cap20 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 20:19:08 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:11@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 20:23:30 caps,info B8:E8:56:XX:XX:72@cap20 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 20:23:34 caps,info B8:E8:56:XX:XX:72@cap20 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 20:39:54 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:11@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 20:48:49 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 20:59:44 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 21:01:40 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 21:15:12 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
 
djtechwork
just joined
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2018 9:23 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 25, 2018 9:33 am

Version 6.42rc14 has been released.


Just tested on RB750GR-3. Works fine, except the usermanager. Unable to access it via web browser...
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 1413
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 25, 2018 10:08 am

djtechwork - You installed latest rc version and User Manager package, can access "/tool user-manager" from CLI, but can not open it on WEB browser (x.x.x.x/userman)? If this is correct, then please generate supout file on your router and send it to support@mikrotik.com.
 
djtechwork
just joined
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2018 9:23 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 25, 2018 10:18 am

djtechwork - You installed latest rc version and User Manager package, can access "/tool user-manager" from CLI, but can not open it on WEB browser (x.x.x.x/userman)? If this is correct, then please generate supout file on your router and send it to support@mikrotik.com.
OK. Thank you..
 
evince
Member
Member
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 12:11 pm
Location: Weiswampach - Luxemburg
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 25, 2018 11:21 am

evince - Have you opened support ticket regarding this issue? We have not received any more complaints that this option would not work and have not experienced any more issues with it in our lab.
Hello Strods, i'll open a ticket right now, thank you.
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 1413
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 25, 2018 12:31 pm

User Manager issue must be resolved within next rc release. Thank you for your report. Issue was fixed based on your report.

Good example why you should write to support not only report it in forum :)
 
sindy
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 4197
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 9:19 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 25, 2018 12:48 pm

Good example why you should write to support not only report it in forum :)
Well, from https://mikrotik.com/support:
If you have bought a RouterOS license or a RouterBOARD product, limited support service might be provided by e-mail for 30 days after the purchase by support@mikrotik.com. Contact your distributor for help and support, if device is not purchased from MikroTik directly.
This does not exactly encourage people to send anything to support@mikrotik.com unless they fulfil the formal requirement or are audacious or desperate enough to try :-)
Instead of writing novels, post /export hide-sensitive. Use find&replace in your favourite text editor to systematically replace all occurrences of each public IP address potentially identifying you by a distinctive pattern such as my.public.ip.1.
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 1413
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 25, 2018 12:52 pm

MikroTik is manufacturer and wholesaler. All the assistance in particular projects as well as regional sales are provided through our distributors and consultants. They all have knowledgeable specialists in their companies who can suggest you the most suitable equipment to use and help with the configuration / installation.

If there is an actual issue with software and/or hardware, then such problems can be resolved only through support@mikrotik.com. None of users in forum, consultants or distributors will not be able to fix issues in RouterOS.
 
sindy
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 4197
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 9:19 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 25, 2018 1:22 pm

If there is an actual issue with software and/or hardware, then such problems can be resolved only through support@mikrotik.com. None of users in forum, consultants or distributors will not be able to fix issues in RouterOS.
If only the PM was working so that I could have sent my previous post to you directly rather than spamming the topic... I perfectly understand that the support team cannot deal with elementary questions of every end user, but to tell a misconfiguration from a bug or even a deliberate limitation (see userman and support of Radius fields required to support EAP) is sometimes not easy even for experienced specialists, so don't be surprised that not everyone dares to send what he believes to be a bug to support unless encouraged to do so by someone at the forum.
Instead of writing novels, post /export hide-sensitive. Use find&replace in your favourite text editor to systematically replace all occurrences of each public IP address potentially identifying you by a distinctive pattern such as my.public.ip.1.
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8321
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 25, 2018 3:18 pm

If only the PM was working so that I could have sent my previous post to you directly rather than spamming the topic...
That's why PMs are disabled :) support@mikrotik.com is his PM
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
msatter
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1342
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 12:56 am
Location: Netherlands / Nīderlande

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Jan 25, 2018 3:40 pm

If only the PM was working so that I could have sent my previous post to you directly rather than spamming the topic...
That's why PMs are disabled :) support@mikrotik.com is his PM
That looks to me a bit selfish because all others have also no private messaging abilities.
Two RB760iGS (hEX S) in series. One does PPPoE and both do IKEv2.
Running:
RouterOS 6.46 / Winbox 3.20 / MikroTik APP 1.3.9
Having an Android device, use https://github.com/M66B/NetGuard/releases (no root required)
 
User avatar
kometchtech
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 194
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 4:25 am
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Jan 26, 2018 3:12 am

Hello everyone,

Regarding CRS317, when updating from ROS6.42rc12 to ROS6.42rc14, it stopped with 'jumping to kernel code' and it can not be started.
Before I mention, CRS317 in my environment has not succeeded in updating packages from system -> package so far.

I have already told this about Mikrotik support, but at the moment it is not possible to recover by netinstall(6.41 and 6.42rc14) as well.

For a while, it may be better to look at the situation with CRS317.

Best regards.
--
Routerboard Users Group JP
http://www.rb-ug.jp/
CCR1009-8G-1S-1S+, RB750Gr3, CRS226-24G-2S+, RB850Gx2, RB960PGS, CRS317-1G-16S+,
RB2011UAS, CRS125-24G-1S, RB962UiGS-5HacT2HnT, CRS212-1G-10S-1S+, RB3011UiAS
 
biatche
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 6:50 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Jan 26, 2018 10:25 am

Here is the config from one controller:
/caps-man access-list
# Main rule to allow strong clients to have a high-speed connection
add action=accept ap-tx-limit=40000000 client-tx-limit=10000000 interface=all signal-range=-80..120
# Rule to prevent clients on the fringe from using 100% of the radio bandwidth
add action=accept ap-tx-limit=500000 client-tx-limit=500000 interface=all signal-range=-87..-80
add action=accept ap-tx-limit=200000 client-tx-limit=200000 interface=all signal-range=-120..-88
# Catch-all rule to test if there is a bug in signal-range matching code
add action=accept ap-tx-limit=100000 client-tx-limit=100000 interface=all signal-range=-120..120
# Catch-all rule to see if a rule without signal-range still checks the signal... it does
add action=accept ap-tx-limit=100000 client-tx-limit=100000 interface=all

Recent logs... I am pretty sure there aren't any client devices capable of 1 GigaWatt.
jan/24 17:49:06 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 17:49:14 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 17:49:25 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 17:50:02 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 17:51:53 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 17:53:58 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 17:58:45 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:11@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 17:59:52 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:11@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 18:00:09 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 18:11:29 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 18:12:31 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 18:28:02 caps,info EC:88:92:XX:XX:F1@cap20 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 18:28:10 caps,info EC:88:92:XX:XX:F1@cap21 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 18:33:27 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:11@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 18:43:38 caps,info D0:22:BE:XX:XX:30@cap21 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 18:43:54 caps,info D0:22:BE:XX:XX:30@cap21 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 18:43:57 caps,info 90:68:C3:XX:XX:4A@cap12 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 18:55:41 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:11@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 18:57:32 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 19:06:20 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:11@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 19:06:24 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:11@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 19:38:43 caps,info F8:62:14:XX:XX:60@cap20 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 19:46:13 caps,info E4:58:E7:XX:XX:D0@cap10 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 19:47:10 caps,info 30:10:B3:XX:XX:60@cap12 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 19:55:38 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:11@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 20:01:54 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:11@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 20:13:45 caps,info F8:62:14:XX:XX:60@cap20 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 20:19:08 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:11@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 20:23:30 caps,info B8:E8:56:XX:XX:72@cap20 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 20:23:34 caps,info B8:E8:56:XX:XX:72@cap20 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 20:39:54 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:11@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 20:48:49 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 20:59:44 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 21:01:40 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
jan/24 21:15:12 caps,info 5C:CF:7F:XX:XX:56@cap17 disconnected, too strong signal 
well... in our email conversation, they finally said they would add this to their list..... didn't sound as if they were gonna add it immediately.

maybe you could email support@mikrotik.com and persuade them why its necessary and that they should have it added to 6.42.
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 1413
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Jan 26, 2018 12:28 pm

Version 6.42rc15 has been released.

Changes since previous release:

*) dhcpv4-server - added "dns-none" option to "/ip dhcp-server network dns";
*) dhcpv6 - make sure that time is set before restoring bindings;
*) dhcpv6-client - added possibility to specify options;
*) dhcpv6-server - added DHCPv4 style user options;
*) fetch - added "output" option for all modes in order to return result to file, variable or ignore it;
*) ippool - added ability to specify comment;
*) radius - added warning if PPP authentication over RADIUS is enabled;
*) routerboard - added RouterBOOT "auto-upgrade" after RouterOS upgrade (extra reboot required);
*) sfp - improved SFP module compatibility;
*) userman - added support for ARM and MMIPS platform;
*) webfig - do not show "hw" option on non-ethernet interfaces;
*) winbox - added "crl-store" setting to certficate settings;
*) winbox - fixed typo from "UPtime" to "Uptime";
*) winbox - fixed Winbox closing when viewing graph which does not contain any data;

If you experience version related issues, then please send supout file from your router to support@mikrotik.com. File must be generated while router is not working as expected or after crash.
 
evince
Member
Member
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 12:11 pm
Location: Weiswampach - Luxemburg
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Jan 26, 2018 2:32 pm

Version 6.42rc15 has been released.

Changes since previous release:

*) routerboard - added RouterBOOT "auto-upgrade" after RouterOS upgrade (extra reboot required);

If you experience version related issues, then please send supout file from your router to support@mikrotik.com. File must be generated while router is not working as expected or after crash.
Hello Strods, can you exlain this feature please?
 
eriitguy
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 1:16 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Jan 26, 2018 2:42 pm

Version 6.42rc15 has been released.

Changes since previous release:

*) routerboard - added RouterBOOT "auto-upgrade" after RouterOS upgrade (extra reboot required);

If you experience version related issues, then please send supout file from your router to support@mikrotik.com. File must be generated while router is not working as expected or after crash.
Hello Strods, can you exlain this feature please?

RouterBOOT "auto-upgrade"!


Thank you!
 
huntah
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 3:24 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Jan 26, 2018 6:36 pm

*) sfp - improved SFP module compatibility;
That this means thaht the following SFP modules are working:
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=120190&p=591082&hi ... 02#p591082

If yes will there be an update for SwOS also?
 
irghost
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 282
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2016 1:49 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Jan 27, 2018 9:36 am

Version 6.42rc15 has been released.

Changes since previous release:

*) dhcpv4-server - added "dns-none" option to "/ip dhcp-server network dns";
*) dhcpv6 - make sure that time is set before restoring bindings;
*) dhcpv6-client - added possibility to specify options;
*) dhcpv6-server - added DHCPv4 style user options;
*) fetch - added "output" option for all modes in order to return result to file, variable or ignore it;
*) ippool - added ability to specify comment;
*) radius - added warning if PPP authentication over RADIUS is enabled;
*) routerboard - added RouterBOOT "auto-upgrade" after RouterOS upgrade (extra reboot required);
*) sfp - improved SFP module compatibility;
*) userman - added support for ARM and MMIPS platform;
*) webfig - do not show "hw" option on non-ethernet interfaces;
*) winbox - added "crl-store" setting to certficate settings;
*) winbox - fixed typo from "UPtime" to "Uptime";
*) winbox - fixed Winbox closing when viewing graph which does not contain any data;

If you experience version related issues, then please send supout file from your router to support@mikrotik.com. File must be generated while router is not working as expected or after crash.
/ip dhcp-client add dhcp-options=hostname,clientid disabled=no interface=ether1


DHCP-client just return after reboot
on vmware template 6.42 rc15
MTCNA MTCRE MTCTCE MTCUME MTCWE MTCIPv6E MTCINE
 
User avatar
frank333
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 12:17 pm
Location: italy Router model: RB3011UiAS-RM

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Jan 27, 2018 11:30 pm

implementing a new type of queue such cake or fq_codel would be a great addition, what do you think?
Metarouter for arm?
 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 5989
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sun Jan 28, 2018 12:26 pm

implementing a new type of queue such cake or fq_codel would be a great addition, what do you think?
Metarouter for arm?
From the Codel Wiki:
CoDel - in order to run well at line rate - requires the Linux 3.3 Byte Queue Limits . It has proven too hard to backport BQL to Linux 3.2 or earlier (an attempt for 3.2 exists, but no driver support), so you will need to upgrade to Linux 3.5 or later, and have a driver that supports BQL (only about 24 as of the present writing).

There you have your answer. You will have to wait for RouterOS V7 at least.
 
User avatar
frank333
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 12:17 pm
Location: italy Router model: RB3011UiAS-RM

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sun Jan 28, 2018 12:44 pm

From the Codel Wiki:
CoDel - in order to run well at line rate - requires the Linux 3.3 Byte Queue Limits . It has proven too hard to backport BQL to Linux 3.2 or earlier (an attempt for 3.2 exists, but no driver support), so you will need to upgrade to Linux 3.5 or later, and have a driver that supports BQL (only about 24 as of the present writing).

There you have your answer. You will have to wait for RouterOS V7 at least.
  • ROS7 will be ready in a year I think.
  • Instead metarouter for ARM devices do you know when it could be ready?
Last edited by frank333 on Mon Jan 29, 2018 3:23 am, edited 2 times in total.
 
hawk
just joined
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:46 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:50 am

I have the problem with MSTP. I configured everything but the machine not see the root path cost and designated bridge. Not calculate costs in MSTP.(CRS317)
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8321
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Jan 29, 2018 12:54 pm

  • ROS7 will be ready in a year I think.
I think the same. For the last few years :)
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
User avatar
frank333
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 12:17 pm
Location: italy Router model: RB3011UiAS-RM

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Jan 29, 2018 5:16 pm

  • ROS7 will be ready in a year I think.
I think the same. For the last few years :)
Is it like saying that there is no hope?
And yet ARM devices are very good in my opinion;would be a real shame.
 
evince
Member
Member
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 12:11 pm
Location: Weiswampach - Luxemburg
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Jan 30, 2018 9:47 am

irghost, raffav, Cha0s - Seems that we have found an issue with new TLS matcher. We will try to fix it as soon as possible;
v6.42rc14, and still not working
Ok it is working, it was a problem of configuration.
 
User avatar
nz_monkey
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1825
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:53 pm
Location: Straya
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Jan 30, 2018 10:21 am

  • ROS7 will be ready in a year I think.
I think the same. For the last few years :)
5 years and counting for me :(

I am not exaggerating when I say my hair has turned gray in the time it has taken for v7 to be released...
http://thebrotherswisp.com/ | Mikrotik MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCINE | Fortinet FTCNA, FCNSP, FCT | Extreme Networks ENA
 
hapi
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 223
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 11:21 am
Location: Czech Republic

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Jan 30, 2018 3:47 pm

Add flow control status to ethernet status in winbox. thx
 
metricmoose
newbie
Posts: 38
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2015 2:03 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Jan 30, 2018 7:47 pm

Version 6.42rc15 has been released.

*) fetch - added "output" option for all modes in order to return result to file, variable or ignore it;
I have been trying to test the ability to store downloaded data in a variable, though I haven't had any luck yet.
[admin@Mikrotik] > /tool fetch https://api.ipify.org/ output=user 
      status: finished
  downloaded: 0KiBC-z pause]
       total: 0KiB
    duration: 0s
        data: [My IP Address was here] 
I can see the data showing up, which is great. Though I can't seem to store that in a variable, I'm used to using "get" in other cases with Mikrotik scripting, but that doesn't seem to be available here. I'm fairly new to Mikrotik scripting, so I hope I'm not missing anything obvious.
 
User avatar
null31
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 6:07 pm
Location: Brazil

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Jan 31, 2018 3:02 am

Hi.
I noted that PVID field has the value 65 as default when add a port to a bridge under the Winbox.
Under terminal is ok, set the value 1 to that field.

Unit RB951Ui-2HnD
ROS 6.42rc15
Winbox 3.11 under wine 3.0 on Arch Linux


Image
 
mducharme
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 879
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2016 6:45 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Jan 31, 2018 7:37 pm

Hi.
I noted that PVID field has the value 65 as default when add a port to a bridge under the Winbox.
Under terminal is ok, set the value 1 to that field.
Confirmed, I see the same thing on rc12
 
JimmyNyholm
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2016 2:16 am
Location: Sweden

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 01, 2018 12:22 pm

that pvid could be seen in 41rc's aswell if you set something it goes away though
 
gumbi2400
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 4:28 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 01, 2018 5:00 pm

I think I found an odd bug.

I recently set up an L2TP/IPSEC VPN connection to an external provider (ipvanish). I noticed that the connection when connecting directly from my local computer I get about 98% of my max internet speed (330Mbps). Setting up this same connection on my rb750gr3 and connecting through there I get no more than 1.5Mbps.

I initially assumed I set up something wrong and went through everything I could think of. Eventually I turned on the packet sniffer to see if I could see anything odd. I ran the speed test again, and I got 98Mbps, not as good as a full blown computer but not bad! When disabling the packet sniffer speed drops back down to 1.5.

In Summary: When using L2TP/IPSEC VPN enabling the packet sniffer increases speed dramatically.

Please let me know if additional information is needed.
 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 5989
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 01, 2018 5:05 pm

You need to turn off fastpath and fasttrack in that case.
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 01, 2018 5:06 pm

Make sure that packets are not catched by fasttrack. If packet is fasttracked it will not be seen by ipsec policy and you get packet loss/slow tunnels.
 
gumbi2400
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 4:28 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 01, 2018 5:29 pm

Ah not a bug after all. My apologies! I feel a bit silly as I thought I already disabled that. Thanks!
 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 5989
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 01, 2018 6:02 pm

Please please please do some work on IPv6!
E.g. following priorities from this posting: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=123302

Things I really need, the sooner the better:
- route marking and multi route tables using marks as in IPv4
(via ipv6 firewall mangle and/or ipv6 route rule)
- configurable IPv6 nameservers in DHCPv6 and RA, or at least the option to publish the router's own
address as nameserver instead of the configured external DNS servers
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 1413
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:03 am

Version 6.42rc18 has been released.

Changes since previous release:

*) bridge - show "hw" flags only on Ethernet interfaces and interface lists;
*) crs3xx - added switch port "storm-rate" limiting options;
*) kidcontrol - added initial support for "/ip kid-control" feature;
*) lte - fixed AT communication with modem (introduced in v6.42rc12);
*) switch - hide "ingress-rate" and "egress-rate" for non-crs3xx switches;
*) tile - improved stability in high throughput HW accelerated IPsec setups ("/system routerboard upgrade" required);
*) upgrade - improved RouterOS upgrade process and restrict upgrade from RouterOS older than v5.16;
*) webfig - fixed backup loading from Webfig on RouterBOARD running default configuration;
*) winbox - allow to comment new object without committing it;
*) wireless - fixed incompatibility with macOS clients;
*) wireless - fixed wireless protocol mode restrictions if lock package is installed and has limits for it;

If you experience version related issues, then please send supout file from your router to support@mikrotik.com. File must be generated while router is not working as expected or after crash.
 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 5989
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:13 pm

*) winbox - allow to comment new object without committing it;
Great!
Another potential improvement in this area: allow to set comment on an object without causing any reconfiguration or state-change on it.
(in some cases the configured object goes down-up when you change the comment!)
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8321
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:19 pm

(in some cases the configured object goes down-up when you change the comment!)
Please report exact cases. They fix it :)
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 1413
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:20 pm

pe1chl - Seems that you misunderstood the fix. Assume that you add firewall rule, specify different parameters and do not press "Ok" button yet. Now you press "Comment" button and specify comment. When you press "Ok" on comment form, then in the past whole rule was added to firewall. Now "Ok" button on comment accepts only comment - it does not create a new rule right away.
 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 5989
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 02, 2018 2:06 pm

(in some cases the configured object goes down-up when you change the comment!)
Please report exact cases. They fix it :)
I think it is easier for them to find all cases where this is handled incorrectly than for me trying to hunt them down and potentially miss some.
It looks like it really happens *everywhere*, however not in all cases there is an observable impact on operations.
(like a connection being dropped and re-established, or similar)
 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 5989
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 02, 2018 2:09 pm

pe1chl - Seems that you misunderstood the fix. Assume that you add firewall rule, specify different parameters and do not press "Ok" button yet. Now you press "Comment" button and specify comment. When you press "Ok" on comment form, then in the past whole rule was added to firewall. Now "Ok" button on comment accepts only comment - it does not create a new rule right away.
I understand that and I think it is great, because in the past I have sometimes gone wrong with that, e.g. because it stored something that was not configured correctly yet after doing a COPY, and I wanted to reset the comment as one of the first steps. In fact, it would be better when the comment is just a separate TAB on the object, like in Webfig.

However, what I mean is when using the yellow icon to only change the comment on an existing object, it should just change the comment and not do anything else with the object.
 
drbunsen
newbie
Posts: 37
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 7:24 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 02, 2018 2:28 pm

I've updated a crs317 from rc6 to rc18 and now the fan is kicking in regularly. It seems it's trying to keep the cpu temperature below 40C as this is the point when it stops again.
There's nothing in the changelog about it and before that I've even seen cpu temperatures of almost 50C without the fan starting. Has this been changed?

At living room temperatures and idling the fan now iterates between running 30 seconds and being 1-2 minutes off. A little bit annoying and I guess also not the best running conditions for the fans on log term. Especially as it was totally quiet before and not remarkably hotter with like around 44C.
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 1413
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 02, 2018 2:47 pm

Version 6.42rc20 has been released.

Changes since previous release:

*) upgrade - improved RouterOS upgrade process and restrict upgrade from RouterOS older than v5.16;

If you experience version related issues, then please send supout file from your router to support@mikrotik.com. File must be generated while router is not working as expected or after crash.
 
drbunsen
newbie
Posts: 37
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 7:24 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 02, 2018 4:10 pm

I've updated a crs317 from rc6 to rc18 and now the fan is kicking in regularly. It seems it's trying to keep the cpu temperature below 40C as this is the point when it stops again.
There's nothing in the changelog about it and before that I've even seen cpu temperatures of almost 50C without the fan starting. Has this been changed?

At living room temperatures and idling the fan now iterates between running 30 seconds and being 1-2 minutes off. A little bit annoying and I guess also not the best running conditions for the fans on log term. Especially as it was totally quiet before and not remarkably hotter with like around 44C.
OK, that was too annoying and I've installed 6.41.1 stable now. Fan stays off with cpu at 42C.
Mikrotik you might want to look into this. Oviously there was some sort of change and as it's not in the changelog I assume it's not intended?
 
User avatar
armandfumal
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 125
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 5:50 pm
Location: Huldange,LUX
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 02, 2018 9:16 pm

*) chr - added "open-vm-tools" on VMware installations;

tested. at least !!!

thanks

Just missing BGP routing in multicore cpu....need this please !!!!
Armand Fumal
________________________________________________________________
MikroTik & Ubiquity
 
User avatar
nz_monkey
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1825
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:53 pm
Location: Straya
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:27 pm

Just missing BGP routing in multicore cpu....need this please !!!!
Please see viewtopic.php?f=3&t=129649#p638204
http://thebrotherswisp.com/ | Mikrotik MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCINE | Fortinet FTCNA, FCNSP, FCT | Extreme Networks ENA
 
jmi2
just joined
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2018 11:41 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Feb 05, 2018 12:19 pm

short version: With this routerOS version, if there is single client with older card like CM9, then all other clients got no change to communicate without issues.
Simply if such client is connected to AP, then mobile and notebook have horrible connectivity and LG TV and hama radio got disconnected always after few seconds.

long version: Starting with 6.37 (actually already before, if previous FWs like 6.36.4 were switched to use wireless-rep) in combination with old HW like CM9, R52 on client side, wireless channel becomes useless for all (other clients of same AP and also clients of other APs on same channel). Same issue is still there with 6.42rc20.

details:
Starting with 6.37 (and already in previous release, if wireless-rep was enabled), also with 6.40.5 and 6.42rc20 i observed below described issue, when old hardware like CM0, r52 and few others were used. I did test always with boards RB433, but i guess it's wireless issue, as it depends on wireless package used. There is no issue if HW r5nH or r52nM is used.
Issue exists in both G-only and A-only mode.

My setup was indoor:
- mikrotik AP bridge
- mikrotik client1
- mikrotik client2
Tested with fixed data rate and fixed power.

1) Each client works fine, if it's alone on AP.
2) In moment, when 2nd client with CM9 and FW 6.37(.3) or newer (or with wireless-rep package) connects, then for others: CCQ is going down, latencies up (even to hundreds on empty links), loss occurs, or client gets disconnected after few seconds (e.g. LG TV, hama radio, mikrotik with r52nM. But e.g. CM9 client survices with loss (Actually both clients have loss, if both a on version 6.37+). Note: 2nd client is not doing any traffic on AP (expect for neighbours discovery and similar, simply only few packets per second).
3) I also tried to setup 2 APs on same channel and connect 1 CM9 client per AP. If clients were on 6.36.4, it all worked fine, even throughput like 10-15mbit on each AP while sharing channel was possible. However, once i updated one client to affected version (tried with 6.40.5 or 6.42rc20), in moment CM9 connected to one AP, problem occured with client on another AP.
4) I wasn't able to reproduce the issue if using only R5nH / R52nM cards in my test setup. Tested with 6.40.5 and all worked fine.

First i spent one night trying to figure out what went wrong with AP or TV ... then i realized it's enough to turn off mikrotik client with CM9, which was updated to latest version, to get my TV, radio and laptop working fine (e.g. with CM9 client turned on speedtest to internet was 0.5mbit, without CM9 client it was 25mbit)
Then I did tests only between 3-4 mikrotik devices (As described) with client on versions 3.30, 4.17, 5.26, 6.0, 6.29.1, 6.33.3, 6.35.4, 6.36.4, where all was fine
and with 6.36.4 with wireless-rep, 6.37.3, 6.38.5, 6.38.7, 6.39.3, 6.40.5, 6.42rc20 where it was causing described problems.

I also did tests for AP side, so far my outcome is, that AP side has not this issue, e.g. works well if AP is with CM9 and 6.40.5. That means, all clients (cm9, r52nM, r5nH) of this AP are working fine (unless that CM9 client is on affected version of routeros).

For configuration: routerOs was fresh after reset, only IP and wifi configured. For wifi i tried with wpa2 aes and also without security. Also tried to disable roaming (if routerOS allowed it).

For me it looks like that with affected versions CM9 / r52 are constantly sending something to the air, which prevents others to communicate.
 
raffav
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 291
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:40 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Feb 05, 2018 4:55 pm

Hello
can someone give me a example how to use TLS-host i tryed to use facebook youtube, allot of site no one worked
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8321
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Feb 06, 2018 7:23 am

can someone give me a example how to use TLS-host i tryed to use facebook youtube, allot of site no one worked
/ip firewall filter
add action=passthrough chain=forward dst-port=443 protocol=tcp tls-host=*.facebook.com
At least I put that rule before Fasttrack rule - and it caught my connection to facebook :)
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
anuser
Member
Member
Posts: 408
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2014 7:27 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Feb 06, 2018 7:58 am

*) wireless - fixed incompatibility with macOS clients;
What problems exist with macOS clients? Which OS X versions are affected? ( I'm running 6.41 on all CAPs and have no issues being reported by OS X clients...)
 
uldis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 3427
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 2:55 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Feb 06, 2018 10:44 am

*) wireless - fixed incompatibility with macOS clients;
What problems exist with macOS clients? Which OS X versions are affected? ( I'm running 6.41 on all CAPs and have no issues being reported by OS X clients...)
If you were setting priorities for the WMM then sometimes the macOS clients didn't accept packets with some priorities.
 
User avatar
frank333
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 12:17 pm
Location: italy Router model: RB3011UiAS-RM

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Feb 06, 2018 12:59 pm

in Bandwidth_Test you might have a box to save the ip of test servers without recompile it all the time?
 
hawk
just joined
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:46 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Feb 06, 2018 2:53 pm

I have the problem with MSTP. I configured everything but the machine not see the root path cost and designated bridge. Not calculate costs in MSTP.(CRS317)
 
User avatar
frank333
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 12:17 pm
Location: italy Router model: RB3011UiAS-RM

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 1:11 am

Tip for developers, so that you do not enter the possibility of a percentage value instead of max-limits in the queue tree?
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8321
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:00 am

Percentage of what?
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
User avatar
frank333
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 12:17 pm
Location: italy Router model: RB3011UiAS-RM

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 11:36 am

Percentage of what?
I meant to say that, instead of entering the max limit value you could assume a fixed value in percentage or at choice.
Of course, ROS should read the bandwidth instantly or after a set time.
(e. g. 10% bandwidth istantly / 1.10=max-limit)
Last edited by frank333 on Thu Feb 08, 2018 11:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
 
sindy
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 4197
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 9:19 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 11:43 am

Percentage of what?
I meant to say that, instead of entering the max limit value you could assume a fixed value in percentage (e. g. 10%) or at choice.
Of course, ROS should read the bandwidth instantly or after a set time.
Again, percentage of what? Interface speed? Some queues are not related to any particular interface.
Instead of writing novels, post /export hide-sensitive. Use find&replace in your favourite text editor to systematically replace all occurrences of each public IP address potentially identifying you by a distinctive pattern such as my.public.ip.1.
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 1413
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 12:02 pm

Version 6.42rc23 has been released.

Changes since previous release:

*) console - fixed "idpr-cmtp" protocol by changing its value from 39 to 38 (CLI only);
*) crs3xx - added initial hw-offload support for 802.3ad and balance-xor bonding
*) disk - fixed disk related processes becoming unresponsive after unplugging used disk;
*) kidcontrol - added initial support for "/ip kid-control" feature;
*) ppp - do not lose "/ppp profile" script configuration after other profile parameters are edited;
*) routerboard - properly report warnings under "/system routerboard" menu;
*) sniffer - fixed situation when "/tool sniffer packet" returned packets in incorrect order;
*) snmp - added w60g support;
*) upgrade - improved RouterOS upgrade process and restrict upgrade from RouterOS older than v5.16;
*) w60g - fixed "/interface w60g reset-configuration";
*) winbox - changed default bridge port PVID value to 1;
*) wireless - added initial support for "nstreme-plus";
*) wireless - improved compatibility with specific wireless AC standard clients;

If you experience version related issues, then please send supout file from your router to support@mikrotik.com. File must be generated while router is not working as expected or after crash.
 
User avatar
kometchtech
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 194
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 4:25 am
Location: Japan
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 12:24 pm

Version 6.42rc23 has been released.

Changes since previous release:

*) console - fixed "idpr-cmtp" protocol by changing its value from 39 to 38 (CLI only);
*) crs3xx - added initial hw-offload support for 802.3ad and balance-xor bonding
*) disk - fixed disk related processes becoming unresponsive after unplugging used disk;
*) kidcontrol - added initial support for "/ip kid-control" feature;
*) ppp - do not lose "/ppp profile" script configuration after other profile parameters are edited;
*) routerboard - properly report warnings under "/system routerboard" menu;
*) sniffer - fixed situation when "/tool sniffer packet" returned packets in incorrect order;
*) snmp - added w60g support;
*) upgrade - improved RouterOS upgrade process and restrict upgrade from RouterOS older than v5.16;
*) w60g - fixed "/interface w60g reset-configuration";
*) winbox - changed default bridge port PVID value to 1;
*) wireless - added initial support for "nstreme-plus";
*) wireless - improved compatibility with specific wireless AC standard clients;

If you experience version related issues, then please send supout file from your router to support@mikrotik.com. File must be generated while router is not working as expected or after crash.
Hi all,

When rc23 was applied, Interface was no longer recognized by OS on the following Routerboard.

- CCR1009-8G-1S-1S+

This was a segmentation fault.

- RB850Gx2

I think that it is better to stop being applied if possible.

Best regards.
Last edited by kometchtech on Thu Feb 08, 2018 12:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
--
Routerboard Users Group JP
http://www.rb-ug.jp/
CCR1009-8G-1S-1S+, RB750Gr3, CRS226-24G-2S+, RB850Gx2, RB960PGS, CRS317-1G-16S+,
RB2011UAS, CRS125-24G-1S, RB962UiGS-5HacT2HnT, CRS212-1G-10S-1S+, RB3011UiAS
 
User avatar
frank333
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 12:17 pm
Location: italy Router model: RB3011UiAS-RM

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 12:33 pm

Percentage of what?
I meant to say that, instead of entering the max limit value you could assume a fixed value in percentage (e. g. 10%) or at choice.
Of course, ROS should read the bandwidth instantly or after a set time.
Again, percentage of what? Interface speed? Some queues are not related to any particular interface.
Image
I thought that in the queue-tree they were divided only into main and parents. I am a beginner.
 
carnivean
just joined
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 4:41 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 12:37 pm

nstreme-plus ? What is it ? ;)
 
chrryd
just joined
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2017 3:03 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 12:44 pm

Version 6.42rc23 has been released.

Changes since previous release:

*) crs3xx - added initial hw-offload support for 802.3ad and balance-xor bonding
Oh! Do we finally get 802.3ad link aggregation in HW on routeros - I've been waiting for that for a long time :-) Any documentation on how to set that up?
 
User avatar
eworm
Member
Member
Posts: 429
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 9:23 am
Location: Oberhausen, Germany
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 12:50 pm

This broke my CHR installation, though I am not sure if 6.42rc23 is involved at all. The system was running 6.42rc20. I booted it and tried to update, the system told me there is not enough free space. After reboot it hangs at "Loading system with initrd".
Manage RouterOS scripts and extend your devices' functionality: RouterOS Scripts
 
mistry7
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1361
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:57 am
Location: Germany

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 1:00 pm

nstreme-plus ? What is it ? ;)
thats my question too
 
morf
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 159
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 5:31 pm
Location: Saint-Petersburg

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 1:10 pm

nstreme-plus ? What is it ? ;)
thats my question too
+
 
User avatar
pietroscherer
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2015 3:05 pm
Location: RS, Brazil
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 1:48 pm

nstreme-plus ? What is it ? ;)
+ 32984920 :lol:
Pietro Scherer
http://www.tchesolutions.com.br [ISPs Consulting and Training]
http://www.routermage.com [Backup and Automation System]
:D
 
UMarcus
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 10:11 am
Location: Europe

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 2:01 pm

*) wireless - improved compatibility with specific wireless AC standard clients;
What does 'improve compatibility' mean ? Also speed related ?
 
fibernet4u
newbie
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 12:44 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 2:05 pm

Dear Admin Team,

Do include as fix in latest release.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=130587&p=641235#p641235
 
th0massin0
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 144
Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 4:16 am
Location: Poland

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 2:25 pm

May I ask about boot from VirtIO-SCSI (in CHR) in this release?
 
User avatar
null31
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 6:07 pm
Location: Brazil

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 2:39 pm

This broke my CHR installation, though I am not sure if 6.42rc23 is involved at all. The system was running 6.42rc20. I booted it and tried to update, the system told me there is not enough free space. After reboot it hangs at "Loading system with initrd".
Same here, except by the message about free space.
Upgrade from 6.42rc20 to 6.42rc23, after reboot, CHR is broken.
Detects one interface only and with mac-address filled with zero.

Linux live and scp to get the supout.rif.

Image from CHR cli: https://i.imgur.com/kfKnjjF.png

I sent a ticket to MikroTik support. [Ticket#2018020822005224]
Last edited by null31 on Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
zryny4
just joined
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2016 12:29 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 2:45 pm

After upgrade from rc20 to rc23, I cannot login to router via http: "ERROR: Not Found", ssh -- ok, login not default admin.
 
doush
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 625
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 3:11 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 2:47 pm

what is nstreme-plus ?
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 1413
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:00 pm

Main part of upgrade process happens on old version.

For example, rc21 -> rc23. If upgrade fails, then it is caused by rc21 version. As you can see in changelog we are still working on upgrade improvements. At the moment latest fixes are included in rc23. You can test upgrade improvements only when upgrade from rc23 to, for example, rc24 will be available.

In future, if you experience problems with upgrade, then remember to mention from which precise RouterOS version and to which you made an upgrade.
 
User avatar
eworm
Member
Member
Posts: 429
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 9:23 am
Location: Oberhausen, Germany
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:04 pm

Main part of upgrade process happens on old version.

For example, rc21 -> rc23. If upgrade fails, then it is caused by rc21 version. As you can see in changelog we are still working on upgrade improvements. At the moment latest fixes are included in rc23. You can test upgrade improvements only when upgrade from rc23 to, for example, rc24 will be available.
Sure. But with "not enough free space available" the system should cancel upgrade and stay with old version, no?
Are you interested in the broken image?
Manage RouterOS scripts and extend your devices' functionality: RouterOS Scripts
 
User avatar
null31
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 6:07 pm
Location: Brazil

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:43 pm

For example, rc21 -> rc23. If upgrade fails, then it is caused by rc21 version. As you can see in changelog we are still working on upgrade improvements. At the moment latest fixes are included in rc23. You can test upgrade improvements only when upgrade from rc23 to, for example, rc24 will be available.
Well...
I tried boot-up a VDI, VMDK and Ova (imported to vbox) from CHR 6.42rc23, all of them show the same message.
Message: https://i.imgur.com/3rs5CPZ.png

Now, I booted-up a VDI from CHR 6.41.1 with IP address, one DNS and one default route. I upgrade to 6.42rc23, no problems after upgrade, but was over a minimal config to access internet and nothing more.

Edit after rc24: Even the VDI of CHR 6.42rc24 show the above message about Missing OS...
Print from CHR 6.42rc24: https://i.imgur.com/Dlg9NSm.png

I feel this release (rc23/24) like a lulz from development team. :lol:
Last edited by null31 on Thu Feb 08, 2018 4:12 pm, edited 5 times in total.
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 1413
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 4:01 pm

Version 6.42rc24 has been released.

Changes since previous release:

*) crs3xx - added initial hw-offload support for 802.3ad and balance-xor bonding
*) export - fixed "/system routerboard mode-button" compact export;
*) firewall - fixed "tls-host" firewall feature (introduced v6.41);

If you experience version related issues, then please send supout file from your router to support@mikrotik.com. File must be generated while router is not working as expected or after crash.t
 
blingblouw
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 278
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:43 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 4:02 pm

Nstreme-plus?
 
User avatar
mozerd
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 288
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 3:39 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:28 pm

this AM I Installed [upgraded] 6.42rc24 on my CCR1009 and now no connectivity --- Winbox cannot discover the Router

How do I recover from this please?

[EDIT] following is what I did to recover:
1. connect my serial cable
2. connect my Ethernet cable to ether7
3. run netinstall
4. reboot the CCR1009 ... use the reset button and hold reset in then power up the router, observer the netinstall screen until it recognizes the router THEN release the reset
5.via netinstall install RouterOS v6.41
6. reconfigure the CCR1009 then upgrade to 6.42rc24 .... so far everything is OK

Thanks to Dan from https://www.balticnetworks.com/ for the excellent help.
Last edited by mozerd on Mon Feb 12, 2018 2:43 pm, edited 3 times in total.
 
User avatar
null31
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 6:07 pm
Location: Brazil

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:35 pm

this AM I Installed 6.42rc24 on my CCR1009 and now no connectivity --- Winbox cannot discover the Router

How do I recover from this please?
Access the router over physical console, or netinstall it!
-----------
CHR v6.42rc24 persist the problem about Missing OS.
I asked to a friend to configure and boot VHDX image on Hyper-V over windows 10.
The result? Fail.
Print from him: https://i.imgur.com/7jVC4oe.png
 
105547111
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 132
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:46 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 6:06 pm

Version 6.42rc24 has been released.

Changes since previous release:

*) crs3xx - added initial hw-offload support for 802.3ad and balance-xor bonding
*) export - fixed "/system routerboard mode-button" compact export;
*) firewall - fixed "tls-host" firewall feature (introduced v6.41);

If you experience version related issues, then please send supout file from your router to support@mikrotik.com. File must be generated while router is not working as expected or after crash.t
Strods,

Doesn't this also have the kernel crash fix for CCR introduced in 6.41.1?
 
raffav
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 291
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:40 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 6:28 pm

@Strods

Since this new crs Poe series is out, so this version belongs to the same of crs1xx having the same features or it have new features available on crs3xx series?


Enviado do meu iPad usando Tapatalk
 
User avatar
honzam
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2298
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:27 pm
Location: Czech Republic

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 6:53 pm

Nstreme-plus?
I upgrade old rb711-5Hnd to 6.42rc24. There is no possibility set nstreme-plus
LAN, FTTx, Wireless. ISP operator
 
Airell
just joined
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 3:40 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 7:03 pm

I bricked my RB850Gx2 when updating to 6.42rc23...
It did not came up and WinBox did not find any mac-address neighbours any of the interfaces.
Clearing config (using hardware reset button) did not work either, I had to use netinstall to get it back to life. :(

Cheers, Airell.
 
raffav
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 291
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:40 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 8:59 pm

MT support
i can confirme that has a bug on this RC 24 version the dhcp-client is buggy, i cant make it work it has a Invalid on terminal
i will set ip manual and sent a suport file to MT email

edit
unfortunately I cant set up manually because i get interface as invalid , so i cant send you a support file
 
LIV2
newbie
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:42 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 9:48 pm

@Strods

Since this new crs Poe series is out, so this version belongs to the same of crs1xx having the same features or it have new features available on crs3xx series?


Enviado do meu iPad usando Tapatalk
It would be nice to finally get LACP on the CRS125. the fact that we haven't got it by now and the changelog only mentions the CRS3XX series doesn't fill me with much hope though.
 
raffav
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 291
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 4:40 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 11:22 pm

Where is the dude client for RC24?
 
CapFloor
just joined
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 1:38 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 08, 2018 11:44 pm

Hi, rc24 didn't only kill one crs1009, it does the same with an rb1100ah4, both out-of-the-box with default configuration. Netinstall brought them back to life.
 
birchman
just joined
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2018 5:04 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 09, 2018 5:24 am

I bricked my CCR1009 when updating to 6.42rc23 :(
What to do?
The Netinstall cant install on a Flash Card or USB
Net boot don't work...
 
alexjhart
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 193
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 8:03 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 09, 2018 6:49 am



*) crs3xx - added initial hw-offload support for 802.3ad and balance-xor bonding
What does "initial" mean here?
-----
Alex Hart

The Brothers WISP
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 1413
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 09, 2018 6:50 am

Main part of upgrade process happens on old version.

For example, rc21 -> rc23. If upgrade fails, then it is caused by rc21 version. As you can see in changelog we are still working on upgrade improvements. At the moment latest fixes are included in rc23. You can test upgrade improvements when upgrading from rc23 to, for example, rc24.

At the moment we are not aware about any problems with upgrade starting from 6.42rc23 version.

In future, if you experience problems with upgrade, then remember to mention from which precise RouterOS version and to which you made an upgrade.
 
CapFloor
just joined
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 1:38 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 09, 2018 11:03 am

Hi,
I did the upgrade to rc24 on both the ccr1009 and the rb1100ahx4 from rc20. Both were bricked then.
BR
 
PatrickKan
just joined
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 7:10 pm

v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 09, 2018 11:36 am

I bricked my CCR1036-8G-2S+ too after flashing rc24 - it got stuck at "Starting services" - tried resetting configurations but nothing works. I managed to force etherboot via serial console but bootp kept trying to connect PC to the router (port 8 ) without success so netinstall failed too. What else can I do?
 
User avatar
null31
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 6:07 pm
Location: Brazil

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 09, 2018 12:59 pm

At the moment we are not aware about any problems with upgrade starting from 6.42rc23 version.
Are you serious about this?
Did you saw my previous posts?
> viewtopic.php?f=21&t=129034&start=150#p641249
> viewtopic.php?f=21&t=129034&start=150#p641262
> viewtopic.php?f=21&t=129034&p=641436#p641289

When has a clean config, upgrade occours normally, but when have various settings, the CHR fail to start or no detect correctly the interfaces.
I reported the problems with CHR and when I download a image from MT's website, I can't use a new image because the ROS doesn't boot and show that message "Missing OS"... this isn't a simple problem from "upgarde", the image available is a problem itself.
To me, this isn't a upgrade problem and yes a "Oops!" in the commit of code with problems to the rc branch.
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 1413
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 09, 2018 1:48 pm

We did explain upgrade process few posts ago. Upgrade happens on old version not on the one which you want to install:
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=129034&p=641456#p641392

Upgrade from 6.42rc20 (not from rc23):
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=129034&start=150#p641249
If I did understand post correctly, then this is about fresh installation, not an upgrade:
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=129034&start=150#p641262
Version from which upgrade was made is not mentioned:
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=129034&p=641436#p641289

I would also like to remind that rc versions are beta versions for RouterOS enthusiasts who are willing to test new features and can Netinstall/re-install RouterOS if necessary.
 
User avatar
null31
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 6:07 pm
Location: Brazil

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 09, 2018 2:22 pm

Upgrade from 6.42rc20 (not from rc23):
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=129034&start=150#p641249
If I did understand post correctly, then this is about fresh installation, not an upgrade:
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=129034&start=150#p641262
Version from which upgrade was made is not mentioned:
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=129034&p=641436#p641289
On the first link, the rc24 hadn't out yet.
On the second link, is about fresh install (rc23 and rc24) where I showed that images don't work, no boot. Also I showed a upgrade over a fresh install (6.41.1 > rc24), worked with no problems.
On the third link, is about a fresh install (rc24) over another platform of virtualizer, to show that problem not occur only on VirtualBox.

On the two last links, I tried to say that rc23 and rc24 doesn't work from a fresh install, they are bricked in the source, the MT's webiste.

The SHA256 of VDI image is ok, then isn't corrupted by download. But if I try to boot them, I receive that message that doesn't have a OS.
[kaze@hueragem3 Downloads]$ sha256sum -c chr-6.42rc24.vdi.sha256
chr-6.42rc24.vdi: OK
If a fresh install don't work, is complicate to use a CHR above of rc20... I'm trying to help about problems, I saw them, are serious and were reported.
I tried to help.
I hope that now is more clear than before.

Remind that CHR don't have Netinstall mode.
I know how the version works on MikroTik and how to be not 7uck3d, and that is why the CHR is my guinea pig, so isn't a problem if they die on upgarde process.

Thanks strods for reply.
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 1413
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 09, 2018 2:30 pm

Thank you for explanation. We will fix this "fresh" installation issue of CHR instances as soon as possible.
 
PtDragon
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 77
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 8:52 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 09, 2018 3:58 pm

update from .20 to .24 build made my ccr1036 hang totally on boot, it did not even respond to reset button.
Netinstall was the only thing that saved the day.
Be careful please with this update!
CCR1036-12G-4S +6x100Mbit ^_^
 
User avatar
null31
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 6:07 pm
Location: Brazil

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 09, 2018 4:13 pm

Did someone tried to do a downgrade to rc18 or more old and then upgrade to rc24?
I saw that 6.42rc20 is a bomb as origin of upgrade to rc23/rc24.

Edit:
Well, I did upgrade on two RB: hap ac lite (rc14) and RB951Ui-2HnD (rc20).
Both to rc24, and no problems with upgrade.
Maybe isn't be a bomb, but...
Last edited by null31 on Fri Feb 09, 2018 5:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 09, 2018 4:18 pm

Be careful with downgrade from rc. It may brick the router.
 
JimmyNyholm
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2016 2:16 am
Location: Sweden

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 09, 2018 4:27 pm

*) crs3xx - added initial hw-offload support for 802.3ad and balance-xor bonding
Jiiiha!.... Will test prompty. Offcourse 4 tuble ip hash srcip srcport dstip dstport will come later right!?
 
User avatar
null31
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 6:07 pm
Location: Brazil

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 09, 2018 4:52 pm

Did someone tried to do a downgrade to rc18 or more old and then upgrade to rc24?
I saw that 6.42rc20 is a bomb as origin of upgrade to rc23/rc24.
Well, I made some tests with CHR only.
CHR images that not have the "Missing OS" is rc15 and below.
I took a rc15 image and did upgrade to rc20 using routeros-x86 npk package, then I rebooted and then made a upgrade from rc20 to rc24, mac-address filled with zero as result.
Before upgrade to rc24, I made a clone from rc20.
I did downgrade from rc20 to rc18 and then, upgrade from rc18 to rc24, Vbox closes the VM due crash to start CHR. :lol:
Upgrade from rc15 to rc24 have no problems.

Simplifying, downgrade from rc18 and above isn't a option, the better is wait in rc15 for newer versions.
If you are in rc18 and rc20, well, prepare your netinstall. :)
 
JimmyNyholm
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2016 2:16 am
Location: Sweden

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 09, 2018 5:08 pm

*) crs3xx - added initial hw-offload support for 802.3ad and balance-xor bonding
Jiiiha!.... Will test prompty. Offcourse 4 tuble ip hash srcip srcport dstip dstport will come later right!?
Ok So I tested on a CRS326-24G-2S+ but neither winbox nor cli shows anything anywhere. Initial maybe initial not ready for test yet or do I need to do something other then define bond and add the bond to the bridge?
 
User avatar
rtacheny
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 58
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 7:13 pm
Location: Braham, MN USA
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 09, 2018 5:08 pm

Are we going to get any kind of response onto what nstreme-plus is? Please?
 
User avatar
indnti
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 11:53 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 09, 2018 6:06 pm

FYI. Upgrade from 6.42rc15 to rc24 on CRS125-24G-1S works fine
 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 5989
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 09, 2018 8:34 pm

When I update my CHR (under ESXi) from 6.42rc20 to 6.42rc24 there is a problem with the interfaces. Looking on the console I see that there
is only ether1 and the references to ether2 are replaced by *2 but both interfaces fail to work. "direct route" is no longer present (default route is)

I understand the real cause is in rc20 and I will need to do a fresh install as I don't have a snapshot backup with older version anymore...
(restoring to rc20 made it working again but update will of course kill it)
 
bbs2web
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 201
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 6:25 pm
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Feb 10, 2018 11:44 am

Could MikroTik please fix BGP peer exports not containing 'remote-as=64512'. We note this behavior on both a 6.41 CHR and CCR1036:
/routing bgp peer
  add default-originate=if-installed in-filter=X-in name=Y out-filter=X-out remote-address=1.1.1.2 tcp-md5-key=secret123 ttl=default remote-as=64512

Then review resulting export:
[admin@router] > /routing bgp peer export
  /routing bgp peer
    add default-originate=if-installed in-filter=X-in name=Y out-filter=X-out remote-address=1.1.1.2 tcp-md5-key=secret123 ttl=default
 
mistry7
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1361
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:57 am
Location: Germany

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Feb 10, 2018 2:24 pm

Are we going to get any kind of response onto what nstreme-plus is? Please?

too secret to tell everyone!
 
User avatar
Jotne
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1312
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2016 11:17 am
Location: jo.overland at gmail.com

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Feb 10, 2018 3:34 pm

Are we going to get any kind of response onto what nstreme-plus is? Please?

too secret to tell everyone!

If this is correct:
nstream is a wireless protocol mikrotik proprietary.
(found using google)
Then I guess that nstreme-plus is the same as nstreme with some more funtion.
 
How to use Splunk to monitor your MikroTik Router

MikroTik->Splunk
 
 
User avatar
rtacheny
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 58
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 7:13 pm
Location: Braham, MN USA
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:06 pm

Are we going to get any kind of response onto what nstreme-plus is? Please?

too secret to tell everyone!

If this is correct:
nstream is a wireless protocol mikrotik proprietary.
(found using google)
Then I guess that nstreme-plus is the same as nstreme with some more funtion.
Googling nstreme is not the answer, protocols can vary vastly. nstreme and NV2 (nstreme version 2) are entirely different. I want details on what is actually different in nstreme plus and would like to know if it was developed specifically for any type of hardware (there have been many complaints with nstreme and nv2 on AC). We have abandoned mikrotik for wireless on 2.4 and 5ghz but still rely on them for some remaining 900mhz customers. I want to know if this will be applicable for us.
 
nkourtzis
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 206
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:56 am
Location: Greece

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Feb 10, 2018 9:23 pm

Dear Mikrotik,

Thank you for including the option for automatic upgrade of the bootloader. Since the new version numbering scheme for routerboot was introduced, this option was the only sensible thing to include. Can you also though make it automatically perform the second -required- reboot? From the moment it is checked, it means that the user desires routerboot to be automatically upgraded when routeros is upgraded. Not performing the reboot essentially leaves the bootloader upgrade process half-finished. It makes sense to complete it by automatically rebooting the unit a second time. It go one step further, I would suggest to have both steps of the upgrade (upgrade and reboot) take place if possible before starting any other services or before the double beep. Possibly you could even introduce a special beep pattern during boot to signal that the bootloder is taking place, maybe a long then short one.

Thank you.
Passionate about networks
Enthusiastic about Mikrotik
MTCNA | MTCRE | MTCINE

No trees were killed to send this message,
but a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
 
0ldman
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1446
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 5:01 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Feb 10, 2018 11:16 pm

Nstreme plus, any hints?

I'm about to update a couple of test units...
 
ste
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1816
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 11:21 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sun Feb 11, 2018 9:26 am

Nstreme plus, any hints?

I'm about to update a couple of test units...
+1

We have some remaining sites with MT wireless. Forced to replace them by customer demands. Would love to do a SW upgrade to keep them running.

@MT could you please describe what nstreme plus will do better ?
 
sup5
Member
Member
Posts: 322
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 12:37 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sun Feb 11, 2018 12:23 pm

The Dude Client is broken after updating to 6.42rc24:
Please wait while updating:
"Bad http response from cloud"


Where is the download for the windows-client?

Edit:
It seems like the Dude-Client tries to fetch this URL:
https://upgrade.mikrotik.com/routeros/6 ... 42rc24.tgz
But it just throws this error message:
This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it. The document tree is shown below.
<Error>
<Code>AccessDenied</Code>
<Message>Access Denied</Message>
<RequestId>C8CAC51C5479E518</RequestId>
<HostId>
3aRnHLgJqfV4AKF81siOXhSgng8kYK1qYiDci7AL7PPOYkAmt0jMpV6AGcyVhvyLNrws/PYiJqQ=
</HostId>
</Error>
I tried a few version numbers. It seems that 6.42rc20 is the newest Dude-Client downloadable.

Mikrotik: fix this please.
Last edited by sup5 on Sun Feb 11, 2018 1:08 pm, edited 2 times in total.
 
server8
Member
Member
Posts: 413
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2011 1:27 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sun Feb 11, 2018 12:32 pm

+1 nstreme plus info update
 
0ldman
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1446
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 5:01 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sun Feb 11, 2018 9:51 pm

Updated two test units, eager to tinker.

There are no new nstreme options, nothing for nv2, nada.

Where/how do we access this and what do they do?
 
Florian
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 67
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2016 9:45 am
Location: France

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Feb 12, 2018 8:21 am

So, if we are under r20 and don't want to "clean flash", we're screwed and can't upgrade, right ?
- Sorry for my english -
 
Smoerrebroed
just joined
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2018 10:21 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Feb 12, 2018 10:24 am

Is it normal that installing 6.42rc24 does not correctly create a bootable system disk when used on x86 hardware? Comes up with "no OS found" or such. 6.42rc15 was just fine in that respect.

Cheers

Smoerrebroed
 
telcouk
just joined
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2018 3:50 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Feb 12, 2018 10:49 am

!) tile - improved overall system performance and stability ("/system routerboard upgrade" required);

Anyone have any details as to what this means?
 
server8
Member
Member
Posts: 413
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2011 1:27 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Feb 12, 2018 12:39 pm

We have started a massive and very expensive migration to other vendor due to low wireless performance with NV2, is it possible to know something about nstreme plus?

I know it's hard for mikortik reveal own strategy but we are working not joking and if we can save money it 'll be very appreciated.

Normis please

Thank you in advance Giuseppe
 
uldis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 3427
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 2:55 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Feb 12, 2018 1:04 pm

Nstreme-plus is almost the same Nstreme protocol but with some additional tweaks to get better compatibility with latest ARM based wireless chipset hardware that we started to release recently.
 
mistry7
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1361
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:57 am
Location: Germany

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Feb 12, 2018 7:34 pm

Nstreme-plus is almost the same Nstreme protocol but with some additional tweaks to get better compatibility with latest ARM based wireless chipset hardware that we started to release recently.
That's exactly what we feared
again only patchwork and no innovation
 
User avatar
rtacheny
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 58
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 7:13 pm
Location: Braham, MN USA
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Feb 12, 2018 9:27 pm

Nstreme-plus is almost the same Nstreme protocol but with some additional tweaks to get better compatibility with latest ARM based wireless chipset hardware that we started to release recently.
So no sync options or anything like that?
 
jmi2
just joined
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2018 11:41 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Feb 12, 2018 9:41 pm

was this thread correct place to report viewtopic.php?f=21&t=129034&p=640649#p640649 ? (as i see neither hint nor confirmation of issue)? Should i post it elsewhere? Thank you.
 
nkourtzis
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 206
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:56 am
Location: Greece

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Feb 12, 2018 9:58 pm

Nstreme-plus is almost the same Nstreme protocol but with some additional tweaks to get better compatibility with latest ARM based wireless chipset hardware that we started to release recently.
That's exactly what we feared
again only patchwork and no innovation

Mate, Mikrotik is mainly routing. Wireless is a peripheral offering, not core business for them. They do not have the horsepower to pursue both of them equally. If you want wireless, go to one of the guys that do that as their main business and then combine the best of both worlds.
Passionate about networks
Enthusiastic about Mikrotik
MTCNA | MTCRE | MTCINE

No trees were killed to send this message,
but a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
 
LeoCombes
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 3:56 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Feb 13, 2018 6:58 pm

*) radius - increase allowed RADIUS server timeout to 60s;

To add an important reason to the too short limit problem of timeout in radius:
Successful authentications are answered immediately (in order of milliseconds if possible), but to protect the server from brute-force attacks and DOS-type attacks, radius is usually configured in order that in case of failed authentication, the response is delayed for a longer time (usually 4 or 5 seconds). In that way the attack slows down and is not effective.

For that it is important to be able to configure a "large" timeout time.
 
mistry7
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1361
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:57 am
Location: Germany

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:26 pm

Nstreme-plus is almost the same Nstreme protocol but with some additional tweaks to get better compatibility with latest ARM based wireless chipset hardware that we started to release recently.
nstreme Connection with this RC ist not working on LHG ac
 
sindy
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 4197
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 9:19 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Feb 13, 2018 9:09 pm

Mate, Mikrotik is mainly routing. Wireless is a peripheral offering, not core business for them. They do not have the horsepower to pursue both of them equally. If you want wireless, go to one of the guys that do that as their main business and then combine the best of both worlds.
Hm, this is probably the reason why the wireless product line contains much more items than the wireless-less ;-) one.
Instead of writing novels, post /export hide-sensitive. Use find&replace in your favourite text editor to systematically replace all occurrences of each public IP address potentially identifying you by a distinctive pattern such as my.public.ip.1.
 
jkarras
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 224
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 3:07 am
Location: Utah, USA

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Feb 13, 2018 9:45 pm

*) radius - increase allowed RADIUS server timeout to 60s;

To add an important reason to the too short limit problem of timeout in radius:
Successful authentications are answered immediately (in order of milliseconds if possible), but to protect the server from brute-force attacks and DOS-type attacks, radius is usually configured in order that in case of failed authentication, the response is delayed for a longer time (usually 4 or 5 seconds). In that way the attack slows down and is not effective.

For that it is important to be able to configure a "large" timeout time.

This isn't actually true as the radius server will return either an accept or deny (if bad password) immediately. This timeout only affects no response from the radius server before it tries to send the exact same packet again. Its still very helpful when your radius server is at a remote site across a high latency link.
 
User avatar
andersonmarin
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 3:21 pm
Location: Brasil
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Feb 14, 2018 9:39 am

nstreme-plus ? What is it ? ;)
+ 32984920 :lol:
Nstreme-plus is almost the same Nstreme protocol but with some additional tweaks to get better compatibility with latest ARM based wireless chipset hardware started to release recently.
Anderson Marin Matozinhos
MikroTik Certified Training Partner
MikroTik Consultant
 
JimmyNyholm
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2016 2:16 am
Location: Sweden

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:25 am

*) radius - increase allowed RADIUS server timeout to 60s;

To add an important reason to the too short limit problem of timeout in radius:
Successful authentications are answered immediately (in order of milliseconds if possible), but to protect the server from brute-force attacks and DOS-type attacks, radius is usually configured in order that in case of failed authentication, the response is delayed for a longer time (usually 4 or 5 seconds). In that way the attack slows down and is not effective.

For that it is important to be able to configure a "large" timeout time.

This isn't actually true as the radius server will return either an accept or deny (if bad password) immediately. This timeout only affects no response from the radius server before it tries to send the exact same packet again. Its still very helpful when your radius server is at a remote site across a high latency link.
And you all miss upon proxied multifactor stuff where upstream servers is waiting on user action on other device. The timeout need to be high so that user have time to respond and router not destroying auth process by resending same request again and being denied due to replay attack.
Auth can be a complicated beast if you dwell down the rabbit hole.
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Feb 14, 2018 11:54 am

60s RADIUS timeout was added exactly for two factor authentication cases.
 
LeoCombes
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 3:56 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Feb 14, 2018 4:14 pm

*) radius - increase allowed RADIUS server timeout to 60s;

To add an important reason to the too short limit problem of timeout in radius:
Successful authentications are answered immediately (in order of milliseconds if possible), but to protect the server from brute-force attacks and DOS-type attacks, radius is usually configured in order that in case of failed authentication, the response is delayed for a longer time (usually 4 or 5 seconds). In that way the attack slows down and is not effective.

For that it is important to be able to configure a "large" timeout time.
This isn't actually true as the radius server will return either an accept or deny (if bad password) immediately. This timeout only affects no response from the radius server before it tries to send the exact same packet again. Its still very helpful when your radius server is at a remote site across a high latency link.
http://networkradius.com/doc/3.0.10/raddb/security.html

reject_delay parameter is used to delay responses, so, server will not return reject immediately if is set to 5 seconds, as I have configured and work as expected.
Accept response is in 120ms roundtrip and reject responses is in 5120ms approximately.
 
alexjhart
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 193
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 8:03 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Feb 14, 2018 4:45 pm



*) crs3xx - added initial hw-offload support for 802.3ad and balance-xor bonding
What does "initial" mean here?
Strods?
-----
Alex Hart

The Brothers WISP
 
105547111
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 132
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:46 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Feb 14, 2018 10:39 pm

Is IGMP snooping fixed in rc24 or in 6.41.2?

Got yelled at last time so I've left it off for now :-)
 
NetflashTechnical
just joined
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 3:43 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 12:54 am

Is IGMP snooping fixed in rc24 or in 6.41.2?

Got yelled at last time so I've left it off for now :-)
Response to my ticket to support@ is that they plan on addressing it in 6.42 eventually, but it doesn't look like it's been touched yet
 
w0lt
Member
Member
Posts: 486
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 2:12 pm
Location: Minnesota USA

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 1:11 am

Doesn't work correctly for me yet using a CRS-125.
MTCNA - 2011

" The Bitterness of Poor Quality Remains Long After the Sweetness of Low Price is Forgotten "

Image
 
anuser
Member
Member
Posts: 408
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2014 7:27 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 10:25 am

Throughput test with laptop (Intel AC3168) + WAP AC + 6.42rc24 and internal test server:
- low download
- good upload

Image
Last edited by anuser on Thu Feb 15, 2018 1:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
ste
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1816
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 11:21 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 12:41 pm

This is a S+RJ10 plugged into CRS317 connected with 1GE to a foreign switch which is not capable of doing 10GE.
Status shows rate=10Gbps which is wrong. Connection works.

Unplugging Ethernetcable makes the port flapping. Show connected/disconnected.



[admin@G10S01] > interface ethernet monitor sfp-sfpplus1 once
;;; TRUNK ins RZ
name: sfp-sfpplus1
status: link-ok
auto-negotiation: done
rate: 10Gbps
full-duplex: yes
tx-flow-control: no
rx-flow-control: no
advertising:
link-partner-advertising:
sfp-module-present: yes
sfp-rx-loss: no
sfp-tx-fault: no
sfp-type: SFP-or-SFP+
sfp-connector-type: RJ45
sfp-link-length-copper: 1m
sfp-vendor-name: MikroTik
sfp-vendor-part-number: S+RJ10
sfp-vendor-revision: 1.0
sfp-vendor-serial: 815D03C24FA5
sfp-manufacturing-date: 17-08-28
sfp-wavelength: 1280nm
eeprom-checksum: good
eeprom: 0000: 03 04 22 00 00 00 00 00 08 00 00 00 64 00 00 00 .."..... ....d...
0010: 00 00 01 00 4d 69 6b 72 6f 54 69 6b 20 20 20 20 ....Mikr oTik
0020: 20 20 20 20 00 00 02 00 53 2b 52 4a 31 30 20 20 .... S+RJ10
0030: 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 31 2e 30 20 05 00 00 31 1.0 ...1
0040: 00 02 00 00 38 31 35 44 30 33 43 32 34 46 41 35 ....815D 03C24FA5
0050: 20 20 20 20 31 37 30 38 32 38 20 20 00 00 00 a6 1708 28 ....
0060: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ ........
0070: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ ........
0080: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ ........
0090: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ ........
00a0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ ........
00b0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ ........
00c0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ ........
00d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ ........
00e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ ........
00f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ ........
 
edinorog
just joined
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2014 3:23 pm
Location: Россия

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 4:07 pm

Image

6.42rc24 :evil: ....................................... 6.42rc27 :evil: how long will this last?
 
huntermic
newbie
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 4:25 pm

Damn, i will be pissed if i get the same netinstall party going again.
Had the same issue when updating from 6.42rc18 -> 6.42.rc24 and it cost me a lot of time. that was on a RB3011UiAS-RM



6.42rc24 :evil: ....................................... 6.42rc27 :evil: how long will this last?
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 4:54 pm

As it was mentioned several times before in this topic. Upgrade happens on old version
6.42rc17 - 6.42rc24 are bad versions, so if you want to upgrade from these versions, use netinstall from the beginning.
 
huntermic
newbie
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 4:59 pm

I read somewhere that 6.42rc24 would not be a version with known issues, so that has changed now?

-------------
Main part of upgrade process happens on old version.

For example, rc21 -> rc23. If upgrade fails, then it is caused by rc21 version. As you can see in changelog we are still working on upgrade improvements. At the moment latest fixes are included in rc23. You can test upgrade improvements when upgrading from rc23 to, for example, rc24.

At the moment we are not aware about any problems with upgrade starting from 6.42rc23 version.

In future, if you experience problems with upgrade, then remember to mention from which precise RouterOS version and to which you made an upgrade.
-------------

As it was mentioned several times before in this topic. Upgrade happens on old version
6.42rc17 - 6.42rc24 are bad versions, so if you want to upgrade from these versions, use netinstall from the beginning.
 
edinorog
just joined
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2014 3:23 pm
Location: Россия

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 5:08 pm

As it was mentioned several times before in this topic. Upgrade happens on old version
6.42rc17 - 6.42rc24 are bad versions, so if you want to upgrade from these versions, use netinstall from the beginning.

I'm wildly sorry! It's now constantly necessary so to install RC via netinstall?
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 5:09 pm

No, only if older version was 6.42rc17 - 6.42rc24
 
edinorog
just joined
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2014 3:23 pm
Location: Россия

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 5:14 pm

No, only if older version was 6.42rc17 - 6.42rc24
Then why when upgrading from version 6.42rc20 to version 6.42rc27 the router again ceased to give signs of life?
 
huntermic
newbie
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 5:16 pm

And we should just believe you when you say it all works perfectly again starting from the untested ( by users ) 6.42.rc27 version?
No, only if older version was 6.42rc17 - 6.42rc24
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 5:18 pm

Because you are upgrading from bad version. upgrade from any of my previously mentioned rc versions most likely will fail.
 
huntermic
newbie
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 5:18 pm

6.42rc20 falls within the range of faulty firmwares ( 6.42rc17 - 6.42rc24 )
No, only if older version was 6.42rc17 - 6.42rc24
Then why when upgrading from version 6.42rc20 to version 6.42rc27 the router again ceased to give signs of life?
 
edinorog
just joined
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2014 3:23 pm
Location: Россия

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 5:24 pm

Because you are upgrading from bad version. upgrade from any of my previously mentioned rc versions most likely will fail.

If I understood you correctly .... then even when the release will be released ... will it be updated to it from the "bad" version it does not work out? I understand the way out 2?
1. Rolls back to the RC version earlier than 17 and is already updated to 27
2. Update the version via netinstall
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 5:35 pm

And we should just believe you when you say it all works perfectly again starting from the untested ( by users ) 6.42.rc27 version?
You don't have to believe me,but upgrade from rc26 to rc27 works, so there is very big chance that upgrade from rc27 will also work :D It is still an RC version anyway so anything can happen.
I do not see the reason for complains, RC was always test version for those who are willing to test it on routers in test environment where netinstalling router is not a problem.
If you put test version on production router or only remotely reachable routers then that is on you.

@edinorog Yes, if you upgrade from bad version upgrade may fail even if you upgrade to final 6.42.
 
User avatar
null31
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 6:07 pm
Location: Brazil

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 5:58 pm

Successful upgrade on hAP ac lite and RB951Ui-2HnD, from rc24 to rc27. And hEX r2 from rc15 to rc27.
Finally is available the band 5Ghz n/ac. :)

CHR's VDI image is working now from fresh install.

Can be added the channel width 40/80mhz?
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 6:23 pm

What's new in 6.42rc27 (2018-Feb-14 11:53):

*) bridge - fixed false MAC address learning on hAP ac2, cAP ac;
*) bridge - fixed incorrect "fast-forward" enabling when ports were switched;
*) bridge - hide options for disabled bridge features in CLI;
*) capsman - added "allow-signal-out-off-range" option for Access List entries (CLI only);
*) capsman - added support for "interface-list" in Access List entries (CLI only);
*) capsman - added support for "interface-list" in datapath (CLI only);
*) capsman - log "signal-strength" when successfully connected to AP;
*) chr - fixed fresh installations (including ISO images) (introduced in v6.42rc24);
*) kidcontrol - initial work on "/ip kid-control" feature;
*) lte - added initial support for SIM7600 LTE modem interface;
*) smb - improved NetBIOS name handling and stability;
*) snmp - added "/interface w60g print oid";
*) tile - fixed occasional reporting of bogus voltage;
*) upgrade - improved RouterOS upgrade process and restrict upgrade from RouterOS older than v5.16;
*) wireless - added "realm-raw" setting for "/interface wireless interworking-profiles" (CLI only);
*) wireless - added initial support for "nstreme-plus";
*) wireless - added support for "band=5ghz-n/ac" (CLI only);
*) wireless - added support for "interface-list" in Access List entries (CLI only);
*) wireless - fixed long "scan-list" entries not working for ARM based wireless interfaces;
 
0ldman
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1446
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 5:01 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 6:36 pm

Throughput test with laptop (Intel AC3168) + WAP AC + 6.42rc24 and internal test server:
- low download
- good upload

Image
Just a heads up, Mikrotik usually has some issue with Intel cards, they generally get them fixed, but Intel's drivers are garbage.

If you can swap from Intel wireless you'll be happier for it. I've done side by side testing with more than just MT APs, every OS from 98 to 10, several versions of Linux. Intel's hardware is sound. Their drivers controlling that hardware are garbage. The only time I really was happy with my Intel cards was when they released the source and someone else made a 2200bg driver for Linux. I don't know if the driver's source is available any more.
 
huntermic
newbie
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 7:12 pm

Why isn't there a test that you can run as developers to see wether you can use a version to upgrade to a version with a higher number? Should be a basic test that prevents us from heaving these issues.
And we should just believe you when you say it all works perfectly again starting from the untested ( by users ) 6.42.rc27 version?
You don't have to believe me,but upgrade from rc26 to rc27 works, so there is very big chance that upgrade from rc27 will also work :D It is still an RC version anyway so anything can happen.
I do not see the reason for complains, RC was always test version for those who are willing to test it on routers in test environment where netinstalling router is not a problem.
If you put test version on production router or only remotely reachable routers then that is on you.

@edinorog Yes, if you upgrade from bad version upgrade may fail even if you upgrade to final 6.42.
 
User avatar
null31
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 6:07 pm
Location: Brazil

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 7:38 pm

Why isn't there a test that you can run as developers to see wether you can use a version to upgrade to a version with a higher number? Should be a basic test that prevents us from heaving these issues.
Developer doing a debug? Well, they know how to don't the wrong things passively.
The users are the best debuggers, they can do something that developers doesn't think.
 
biatche
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 6:50 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 8:41 pm

*) capsman - added "allow-signal-out-off-range" option for Access List entries (CLI only);
thanks for adding that... but i hope the spelling within winbox is allow-signal-out-of-range
 
sid5632
Member
Member
Posts: 358
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 6:05 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 8:57 pm

What's new in 6.42rc27 (2018-Feb-14 11:53):
Where is the Dude client? Again?
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 1413
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 9:17 pm

Please remember what we have been telling from the first public rc release - rc versions are provided for MikroTik enthusiasts who are ready to Netinstall router if necessary. Versions are tested on few routers and released right away. If you are experiencing issues with an upgrade and do not want to Netinstall devices any more, then you should wait for a final 6.42 release.
 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 5989
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 9:34 pm

Is it safe to make a backup of a CHR running 6.42rc20 then install 6.42rc27 using OVA and then restore the backup?
Or will that re-introduce the problem?
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 1413
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 9:55 pm

Issue is not with the device or configuration, it is the upgrade process itself. We recommend that you make export file, try to upgrade (if you had problematic rc installed), if fail, then Netinstall device or make a new installation (CHR, VM) and import configuration back.

Unfortunately sometimes you have to make sacrifices in order to get a better results. This time sacrifice is a batch of few bad rc versions in order to make upgrade process much more reliable.

Thank you for those who are testing rc versions and reporting results back to support. We really appreciate that and other RouterOS users also have much less problems when full releases come out.
 
User avatar
TomjNorthIdaho
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1007
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:25 pm
Location: North Idaho
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:18 pm

Re: What's new in 6.42rc27 (2018-Feb-14 11:53):

hmmm , would somebody shed some light/information on the following:
*) chr - fixed fresh installations (including ISO images) (introduced in v6.42rc24);
*) wireless - added "realm-raw" setting for "/interface wireless interworking-profiles" (CLI only);
*) wireless - added initial support for "nstreme-plus";
*) wireless - fixed long "scan-list" entries not working for ARM based wireless interfaces;

North Idaho Tom Jones
 
105547111
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 132
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:46 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 16, 2018 12:56 am

Please remember what we have been telling from the first public rc release - rc versions are provided for MikroTik enthusiasts who are ready to Netinstall router if necessary. Versions are tested on few routers and released right away. If you are experiencing issues with an upgrade and do not want to Netinstall devices any more, then you should wait for a final 6.42 release.
Okay this is indeed perfectly true, but why do support insist on a 6.41.1 and 6.41.2 tickets running RC on production routers or else the fix will have to wait until 6.42 final?
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 1413
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 16, 2018 6:40 am

105547111 - Sometimes we can make potential fix for the problem based on supout files. After that fix must be tested (if we can not reproduce the same problem locally). We are not forcing anyone to test rc versions. These fixes are introduced with an option - if you do not mind testing the fix, then try out rc version. Fixes are not included in 6.x.y versions (without confirmation that fix has actually helped) so you would have as much reliable release as possible.
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 1413
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 16, 2018 3:23 pm

What's new in 6.42rc28 (2018-Feb-16 07:02):

*) chr - added "virtio-scsi" driver on KVM installations;
*) chr - added support for Hyper-V ballooning;
*) chr - added support for Hyper-V guest quiescing;
*) chr - added support for Hyper-V host-guest file transfer;
*) chr - added support for Hyper-V integration services;
*) chr - added support for Hyper-V static IP injection;
*) chr - added support for NIC hot-plug on VMware and Xen installations;
*) chr - fixed additional disk detaching on Xen installations;
*) ipsec - properly detect interface for "mode-config" client IP address assignment;
*) gps - improved NMEA sentence handling;
*) r11e-lte - improved LTE connection initialization process;

If you experience version related issues, then please send supout file from your router to support@mikrotik.com. File must be generated while router is not working as expected or after crash.
 
User avatar
indnti
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 11:53 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 16, 2018 3:47 pm

As it was mentioned several times before in this topic. Upgrade happens on old version
6.42rc17 - 6.42rc24 are bad versions, so if you want to upgrade from these versions, use netinstall from the beginning.

Will there be no fix that is ist possible to upgrade from one of this versions?
Or what a bout a downgrade e.g. from 6.42.rc20 to 6.41.2 ?
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 24337
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 16, 2018 3:51 pm

As it was mentioned several times before in this topic. Upgrade happens on old version
6.42rc17 - 6.42rc24 are bad versions, so if you want to upgrade from these versions, use netinstall from the beginning.

Will there be no fix that is ist possible to upgrade from one of this versions?
Or what a bout a downgrade e.g. from 6.42.rc20 to 6.41.2 ?
Answered many times before! The old version is the one that performs upgrade. We can't fix a released and installed version.
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
User avatar
ziegenberg
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 11:14 am
Location: Vienna
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:45 pm

Well!
What's new in 6.42rc28 (2018-Feb-16 07:02):

*) chr - added "virtio-scsi" driver on KVM installations;
*) chr - added support for Hyper-V ballooning;
*) chr - added support for Hyper-V guest quiescing;
*) chr - added support for Hyper-V host-guest file transfer;
*) chr - added support for Hyper-V integration services;
*) chr - added support for Hyper-V static IP injection;
*) chr - added support for NIC hot-plug on VMware and Xen installations;
Thank you very, very much!!
 
sindy
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 4197
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 9:19 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:46 pm

As it was mentioned several times before in this topic. Upgrade happens on old version

Will there be no fix that it is possible to upgrade from one of this versions?
We can't fix a released and installed version.
Well, you definitely cannot, but I assume it would be technically possible to provide a dedicated application (as an npk file) which would both perform the configuration upgrade and then install the software upgrade instead of the running version. I understand that this would be way too much effort to spend on every single RC version just to save the adrenaline addicts who use RC for machines they cannot easily reach for netinstall, but I had a case of losing conifguration when upgrading from 6.41 stable to 6.42rc9. Netinstall wasn't necessary in this case, but I would have been very disappointed if that would have happened to me when upgrading the 6.41 to 6.41.2 1500 km crow line away on the same model (which luckily didn't happen).

And don't be surprised that it is hard for people to get the concept - the upgrade process of every other vendor I've met works on the principle that the new software knows how the configuration structure looked like in the previous versions and converts it into its own format if necessary. In your case, with just a little bit of exaggeration, each version must be a future-teller and expect what any of the future versions will require. A much more interesting challenge to deal with, I guess. (I actually assume that the truth is somewhere in between and that the leaving version has to export its configuration into some generic format which the coming version then converts into whatever it needs, and that this export process is where the bugs are, but the more it should be possible to create a "postfix" application which would export the running configuration into that generic format instead of the leaving version itself, maybe into another file which the coming version would prefer over the one created by the leaving application if it would find it).
Instead of writing novels, post /export hide-sensitive. Use find&replace in your favourite text editor to systematically replace all occurrences of each public IP address potentially identifying you by a distinctive pattern such as my.public.ip.1.
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 16, 2018 5:17 pm

I think you are mixing two different things. Upgrade failure had nothing to do with configuration. Software installation process was redesigned, which led to "bricked" (unable to boot) routers in those RC versions.
 
sindy
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 4197
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2017 9:19 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 16, 2018 5:39 pm

I think you are mixing two different things. Upgrade failure had nothing to do with configuration. Software installation process was redesigned, which led to "bricked" (unable to boot) routers in those RC versions.
Apologies, this is probably because my imagination was not wild enough to admit that the task of downloading a binary and applying it could go so much wrong :-) So I've assumed that the configuration conversion must be the culprit.

Do I read you right that a reboot with just a single new .npk module (like hotspot) would brick the machine as well if it runs a "bad" RC version?

Regardless the above, when the machine is far/high/deep enough to be physically connected to, it is not a big difference whether you need to netinstall it or "only" restore the default configuration and then modify or replace it.
Instead of writing novels, post /export hide-sensitive. Use find&replace in your favourite text editor to systematically replace all occurrences of each public IP address potentially identifying you by a distinctive pattern such as my.public.ip.1.
 
owsugde
just joined
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:01 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 16, 2018 7:10 pm

6.42rc28 wrecked my CHR on libvirtd / Qemu KVM setup. Virtio network interfaces (or any interfaces at all) aren't recognized anymore.

Do not install 6.42rc28 on KVM CHR!

Still trying to salvage this thing, will write more later...

Add: Just managed to get 6.41.2 installed. Had to get the stable package file to the guest first somehow, which if you don't have any way of officially interacting with the guest on the host (interfaces are all down) is quite the ordeal:
  • mount raw image with manually calculated offset
  • put file in right place in Linux file system underlying RouterOS
  • run guest, qemu console to it, login, do /system package downgrade
I can only repeat: Don't install rc28 on QEMU/KVM!!
Last edited by owsugde on Fri Feb 16, 2018 9:12 pm, edited 3 times in total.
 
drbunsen
newbie
Posts: 37
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 7:24 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 16, 2018 8:40 pm

CHR on rc28:
- disabled package dude
- disabled package wireless
- disabled package hotspot
- enabled package ipv6

After reload, packages show correctly to be disabled/enabled, but in WebFig CapsMan, Wireless and Dude menus are still there and IPv6 one is missing. On the terminal IPv6 is there and the others are gone.

Edit: Not sure what happened, but after configuring some more stuff WebFig now shows IPv6 and the disabled ones are gone. Maybe it was a browser issue as I also closed the Tab completely in between?
Last edited by drbunsen on Fri Feb 16, 2018 10:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
105547111
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 132
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:46 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 16, 2018 9:14 pm

6.42rc28 wrecked my CHR on libvirtd / Qemu KVM setup. Virtio network interfaces aren't recognized anymore.

Do not install 6.42rc28 on KVM CHR!

Still trying to salvage this thing, will write more later...
:-( Oh no... I also had a CHR running same RC in qemu/kvm and bang wouldn't even boot. Quickest fix was I had backup image of the CHR and always download current backups. Copied over current image and then uploaded the backup and restored, since its the same CHR.

Now anytime I take a VM down I backup the image :-)
 
UpRunTech
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 96
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2012 12:11 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 16, 2018 10:12 pm

*) wireless - fixed incompatibility with macOS clients


What was fixed or improved here? Will this also improve IOS clients? I have some sites with a lot of Macbook Airs and iPads so am keen to know,
 
Pea
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 192
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2015 11:07 pm
Location: Czech

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 16, 2018 10:50 pm

Already answered in this topic:
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=129034&start=150#p640819
 
UpRunTech
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 96
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2012 12:11 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 16, 2018 11:33 pm

Derp, well that's good. I am definitely mangling packets with prio. from high 3 DSCP bits to make sure Airplay works as well as possible with WMM. Still I wonder, will this help IOS units too or do they not have this problem? When did the bug get introduced or was it always there?
 
anuser
Member
Member
Posts: 408
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2014 7:27 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Feb 17, 2018 1:45 am

What's new in 6.42rc27 (2018-Feb-14 11:53):
*) wireless - added support for "band=5ghz-n/ac" (CLI only);
1. setting this one within CAPSMAN would be nice to have.
2. What will be the difference between "band=5ghz-a/n/ac" and "5ghz-n/ac"? Some kind of old compatible mode on the first one that will be disabled on the second and therefore results in higher performance?
 
User avatar
null31
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 6:07 pm
Location: Brazil

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Feb 17, 2018 1:51 am

2. What will be the difference between "band=5ghz-a/n/ac" and "5ghz-n/ac"? Some kind of old compatible mode on the first one that will be disabled on the second and therefore results in higher performance?
It's like the 2ghz-g/n, where is disabled the 802.11b.
 
ckleea
newbie
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:19 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Feb 17, 2018 2:28 am

Is it ok to upgrade from 6.42rc3 to 6.42rc28?

I tried to upgrade from v21 to v24 and it caused by x86 routerOS fail to have connection. I have used sometimes to restore the older working version. The one I got at home was rc3.
 
biatche
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 6:50 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Feb 17, 2018 6:24 am

*) wireless - fixed incompatibility with macOS clients
can mikortik tell us if this is (presumably) implied for capsman as well?
 
biatche
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 6:50 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Feb 17, 2018 6:26 am

What's new in 6.42rc27 (2018-Feb-14 11:53):
*) wireless - added support for "band=5ghz-n/ac" (CLI only);
1. setting this one within CAPSMAN would be nice to have.
2. What will be the difference between "band=5ghz-a/n/ac" and "5ghz-n/ac"? Some kind of old compatible mode on the first one that will be disabled on the second and therefore results in higher performance?
yes mikrotik, please tell us if disabling an old band mode results in an improvement. dont make me create a new email ticket for every question
 
User avatar
Alessio Garavano
Member
Member
Posts: 304
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 12:49 am
Location: Corrientes, Argentina
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Feb 17, 2018 6:52 am

Hi guys, it would be great if you allow to select, within each update channel, 5 or 6 previous versions, in order to update the RC versions correctly and correlatively.
Or make a downgrade directly to the previous version that we liked or better worked for us.

Thanks and regards,
Alessio Garavano
http://www.isparg.com.ar
 
WireDick
just joined
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2017 3:26 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Feb 17, 2018 2:27 pm

Bricked RB3011UiAS-RM by updating from rc20 To rc27.

LCD shows always "starting services"...

Netinstall wont work anymore... LCD shows ether Boot but Router will not apear in netinstall GUI. Troubleshoot this with other mikrotik products they imedatly apear on the GUI at the same win7 machine with same settings and cable/port...

don't update from any RC!!! it will brick the device.
 
User avatar
osc86
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 58
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2017 1:15 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Feb 17, 2018 2:36 pm

CPU hog issue is still not fixed in rc28
(Ticket#2018010522007579)

Image
 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 5989
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sun Feb 18, 2018 12:25 am

I had a CHR that was originally installed on VMware ESXi some versions ago when only the bare disk image was available.
(using the trick of converting the image to SCSI)
It initially had ether1 connected to a LAN network (which has access to internet via another router), later ether2 was added
directly connected to internet, and configured in RouterOS. It had Dude installed but not enabled at this time.

As it was effectively stuck at 6.42rc20 because of the update bug, I exported the config and the dude database and created a
new VM from the 6.42rc28 OVA file. I connected ether1 to the LAN and added a second network interface to the VM, again
connected to internet as before.

However, whatever I try, RouterOS sees the LAN interface as ether2 and the internet interface as ether1. So what is called
network interface 1 in ESXi is ether2 in RouterOS.
Even when I deleted the second network interface and reset the configuration, seeing that LAN is ether1 and everything is correct,
as soon as I added the extra interface the names were swapped again.

I gave in and edited my exported config to match the swapped ether1 and ether2 and everything now works as before,
but what is going on here? it is confusing and inconvenient.
 
User avatar
null31
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 6:07 pm
Location: Brazil

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sun Feb 18, 2018 4:11 am

However, whatever I try, RouterOS sees the LAN interface as ether2 and the internet interface as ether1. So what is called
network interface 1 in ESXi is ether2 in RouterOS.
Even when I deleted the second network interface and reset the configuration, seeing that LAN is ether1 and everything is correct,
as soon as I added the extra interface the names were swapped again.
The same occurs in VirtualBox since rc23 (I saw this after the upgrade from rc20 to rc23).

I configured a fresh CHR in rc27, on first try, swapped the interfaces. On second try, was disabled the NIC #2 and I did a MAC reinitialize in both interfaces. Booted with one interface and I added a new IP to ether1 and then was shutdown. Was enabled NIC #2 and booted, then the problem stopped.
I upgraded to rc28 and no problem with swapped interfaces.

The interfaces that I use in VBox are "Intel PRO/1000 MT Desktop", NIC #1 as bridged and NIC #2 as NAT Network.
 
User avatar
indnti
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 11:53 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sun Feb 18, 2018 11:17 pm

Answered many times before! The old version is the one that performs upgrade. We can't fix a released and installed version.

If you bring out a version that *bricks* hardware you must consider that it will not happen. maybe a special intermediate version to repair version rc20-24. It can not be true that one be forced to use rc20 till the end of lifetime of that hardware!
 
User avatar
ziegenberg
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 11:14 am
Location: Vienna
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:06 am

Hello!
If you bring out a version that *bricks* hardware you must consider that it will not happen. maybe a special intermediate version to repair version rc20-24. It can not be true that one be forced to use rc20 till the end of lifetime of that hardware!
Well, RC Versions are not meant to be production ready versions. So expect them to break stuff. And because of that, only use them in a lab or test environment, where you are happy to do netinstall if things break.

PS: I still advocate that MikroTik changes the name of the "release candidate" version to "beta", "development" or "unstable" version. Just to be crystal clear about it's purpose and for the sake of customer happiness.
 
kasparskr
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 112
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 11:46 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Feb 19, 2018 10:17 am

Could you please send the supout file to support, we would like to take a look at it.

Which ESXi version are you using?
I had a CHR that was originally installed on VMware ESXi some versions ago when only the bare disk image was available.
(using the trick of converting the image to SCSI)
It initially had ether1 connected to a LAN network (which has access to internet via another router), later ether2 was added
directly connected to internet, and configured in RouterOS. It had Dude installed but not enabled at this time.

As it was effectively stuck at 6.42rc20 because of the update bug, I exported the config and the dude database and created a
new VM from the 6.42rc28 OVA file. I connected ether1 to the LAN and added a second network interface to the VM, again
connected to internet as before.

However, whatever I try, RouterOS sees the LAN interface as ether2 and the internet interface as ether1. So what is called
network interface 1 in ESXi is ether2 in RouterOS.
Even when I deleted the second network interface and reset the configuration, seeing that LAN is ether1 and everything is correct,
as soon as I added the extra interface the names were swapped again.

I gave in and edited my exported config to match the swapped ether1 and ether2 and everything now works as before,
but what is going on here? it is confusing and inconvenient.
 
kasparskr
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 112
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 11:46 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Feb 19, 2018 10:21 am

Could you please send us to support the supout file, we would like to take a look.

Also, please explain in more detail what exactly did you do: did you upgrade from an earlier rc? Or from current version? From which?

Thanks.
6.42rc28 wrecked my CHR on libvirtd / Qemu KVM setup. Virtio network interfaces (or any interfaces at all) aren't recognized anymore.

Do not install 6.42rc28 on KVM CHR!

Still trying to salvage this thing, will write more later...

Add: Just managed to get 6.41.2 installed. Had to get the stable package file to the guest first somehow, which if you don't have any way of officially interacting with the guest on the host (interfaces are all down) is quite the ordeal:
  • mount raw image with manually calculated offset
  • put file in right place in Linux file system underlying RouterOS
  • run guest, qemu console to it, login, do /system package downgrade
I can only repeat: Don't install rc28 on QEMU/KVM!!
 
ste
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1816
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 11:21 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Feb 19, 2018 10:50 am

Hello!
If you bring out a version that *bricks* hardware you must consider that it will not happen. maybe a special intermediate version to repair version rc20-24. It can not be true that one be forced to use rc20 till the end of lifetime of that hardware!
Well, RC Versions are not meant to be production ready versions. So expect them to break stuff. And because of that, only use them in a lab or test environment, where you are happy to do netinstall if things break.

PS: I still advocate that MikroTik changes the name of the "release candidate" version to "beta", "development" or "unstable" version. Just to be crystal clear about it's purpose and for the sake of customer happiness.
Yes. "Release Candidate" normaly is something that is expected to be near production quality:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_ ... _candidate
And at least CRS317-1G-16S+RM needs the rc to work. And there is no hint CRS317-1G-16S+RM is a beta product.

So please MT increase your SW Development Quality control to protect your customers from bad experience.
 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 5989
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Feb 19, 2018 11:29 am

I encountered another problem in my "fresh 6.42rc28 install then import old config" that I forgot to mention above:
I am using the serial port on this CHR (configured to map to the hardware serial port in the VMware ESXi config) to
connect to the serial port of a CCR router at the same site. This is an emergency access in case there is some
error in the CCR config. (the CHR is on a bridge in the CCR so it will not always be useful, but one can always try)

Well, for that config in the previous version there was this:
/port
set 0 baud-rate=115200
On the new version this config is refused with "cannot set speed because port is in use".
(and the import stops there! that is another issue that should be fixed: when such an error is encountered when
importing a config, the import should just go on with the next step. this kind of problem makes it impossible to
do a /system reset-configuration no-defaults=yes run-after-reset=scriptname because almost always there is some
minor hiccup like this and you are left with an unconfigured router)

When examining the situation I found it is now required to go to /system console and disable the console on the
serial port. After doing that, it is again possible to set the serial port speed.

However, when looking in the /export after that, this command:
/system console
set [ find ] disabled=yes
appears way down in the /export and the /port (same as above) still appears near the top.
So importing this config on a freshly reset router will still fail!
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Feb 19, 2018 12:19 pm

It can not be true that one be forced to use rc20 till the end of lifetime of that hardware!
You are not forced to use rc20. Use netinstall to install version.
 
User avatar
indnti
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 11:53 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Feb 19, 2018 6:06 pm

It can not be true that one be forced to use rc20 till the end of lifetime of that hardware!
You are not forced to use rc20. Use netinstall to install version.
What about that experience:
Bricked RB3011UiAS-RM by updating from rc20 To rc27.
LCD shows always "starting services"...
Netinstall wont work anymore... LCD shows ether Boot but Router will not apear in netinstall GUI. Troubleshoot this with other mikrotik products they imedatly apear on the GUI at the same win7 machine with same settings and cable/port...
don't update from any RC!!! it will brick the device.
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Mon Feb 19, 2018 6:12 pm

If you use netinstall to install newer version then there will be no problems. It was already mentioned before several times.
 
timoid
newbie
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 8:20 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Feb 20, 2018 2:10 am

rc28 broken for chr+esxi?

using vmxnet3 drivers, two interfaces becomes one and the one interface that's there has a mac of all zeros.
 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 5989
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:12 am

rc28 broken for chr+esxi?

using vmxnet3 drivers, two interfaces becomes one and the one interface that's there has a mac of all zeros.
I have it working on ESXi but see above for an issue I have (the sequence of the ESXi interfaces is not the same as the ether#)

Maybe you have upgraded from a version around 6.42rc20? Then, this is indeed the problem that you will have.
You will need to re-install from the OVA or image!
 
tigro11
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:31 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Feb 20, 2018 3:28 pm

hi guys, on my rb750Gr3 with firmware 6.42rc28 I wanted to mount a hotspot for a job. I can not install the user-manager package.
Are there any solutions?
thank you all

Valerio
 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 5989
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Feb 20, 2018 3:31 pm

hi guys, on my rb750Gr3 with firmware 6.42rc28 I wanted to mount a hotspot for a job. I can not install the user-manager package.
Are there any solutions?
No. There is no usermanager for this router, also not for stable version.
It is unclear why this is, e.g. there is a dude (network monitoring) package for this router, so the smallish (low-end) type should not be the reason.
Anyway, you need another router type or use an external RADIUS server e.g. a Raspberry Pi with freeradius.
(which provides a lot more functionality than usermanager anyway, and you could use it to host a local webpage too)
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Feb 20, 2018 3:36 pm

Yes, there is 6.42rc changelog:
*) userman - added support for ARM and MMIPS platform;

Download MMIPS extra packages, there will be userman package in archive.
 
tigro11
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:31 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Feb 20, 2018 4:07 pm

in the zip file is not present in the package, or have changed package name.
 
User avatar
mrz
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm
Location: Latvia
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Feb 20, 2018 4:25 pm

um-snap.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
tigro11
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:31 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Feb 20, 2018 4:29 pm

it is only present on the beta version.
I tried to install it, but it does not install.
I have also installed the beta firmware but do not install lost
 
tigro11
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:31 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Feb 20, 2018 7:17 pm

I see that the previous posts have been deleted.
Returning to the question, it turns out to you that the package is not installed?
is this a problem already reported?
thank you
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8321
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Feb 20, 2018 9:30 pm

Why it doesn't install? What's in Log after reboot? We're not telepathists...
Russian-speaking forum: https://forum.mikrotik.by/. Welcome!

For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

MikroTik. Your life. Your routing.
 
kez
newbie
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:13 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Feb 20, 2018 9:53 pm

[removed]
Last edited by kez on Fri Feb 23, 2018 8:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
 
tigro11
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:31 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:42 pm

Why it doesn't install? What's in Log after reboot? We're not telepathists...
then, after doing a reset and installing version 6.41.2 I tried to reinstall the package user-manager-6.42rc20-mmips.npk but nothing to do. after reboot the package is not installed

now he is continuously restarting by making a beep
Last edited by tigro11 on Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 5989
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:46 pm

then, after doing a reset and installing version 6.41.2 I tried to reinstall the package user-manager-6.42rc20-mmips.npk but nothing to do. after reboot the package is not installed
That is normal! You can ONLY install the same version!
 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 5989
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:47 pm

I see that the previous posts have been deleted.
That is a pity indeed. It looks like the forum database has crashed and a backup has been loaded.
 
tigro11
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:31 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:12 pm

I tried to reset it, but it keeps rebooting with a beep at every reboot. How can I rewrite the firmware?
thank you
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 1413
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Feb 21, 2018 7:47 am

What's new in 6.42rc30 (2018-Feb-20 10:44):

*) console - improved console stability after it has not been used for a long time;
*) filesystem - implemented additional system storage maintenance checks on ARM CPU based devices;
*) filesystem - improved error correcting process on RB1100AHx4 storage;
*) gps - added GPS port support for Quectel EC25-E modem when used in LTE mode;
*) ipsec - properly detect interface for "mode-config" client IP address assignment;
*) kidcontrol - initial work on "/ip kid-control" feature;
*) lte - fixed rare situation when r11-LTE interface is missing after reboot;
*) lte - improved IP configuration request process for r11e-LTE-US card;
*) netwatch - limit to read, write, test and reboot policies for Netwatch script execution;
*) tr069-client - correctly return TransferComplete after vendor configuration file transfer;
*) usb - improved packet processing over USB modems;
*) wireless - improved wireless stability on hAP ac2 devices while USB is being used;

If you experience version related issues, then please send supout file from your router to support@mikrotik.com. File must be generated while router is not working as expected or after crash.

Note that release candidate versions are published strictly for testing purposes and should not be used on production routers.
 
User avatar
eworm
Member
Member
Posts: 429
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 9:23 am
Location: Oberhausen, Germany
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:23 am

*) ipsec - properly detect interface for "mode-config" client IP address assignment;
This is broken again. Sent my info to [Ticket#2018012322003459].
Manage RouterOS scripts and extend your devices' functionality: RouterOS Scripts
 
tigro11
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:31 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:25 am

I have the rb 750gr3 in continuous loop, after 5 seconds reboots and makes a beep, can you restore the firmware maybe via micro sd or with the usb port?
With netinstall it does not see the cpu.
 
User avatar
null31
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 6:07 pm
Location: Brazil

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Feb 21, 2018 1:58 pm

I have the rb 750gr3 in continuous loop, after 5 seconds reboots and makes a beep, can you restore the firmware maybe via micro sd or with the usb port?
With netinstall it does not see the cpu.
Try the ether1 on hEX (750Gr3) and connect it directly to PC.
Tips: viewtopic.php?f=13&t=131072#p643620
 
owsugde
just joined
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:01 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:17 pm

Installing 6.42rc30 from rc20 makes the RB3011 unbootable! See other descriptions of update bug.

Updated from rc20 to rc30, didn't boot back up. Resetting didn't do anything, so I had to netinstall back the stable. And that even only worked after three tries. :shock:
Last edited by owsugde on Wed Feb 21, 2018 6:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 5989
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:20 pm

6.42rc30 makes the RB3011 unbootable! Don't install!

Updated from rc20 to rc30, didn't boot back up. Resetting didn't do anything, so I had to netinstall back the stable. And that even only worked after three tries. :shock:
This is wellknown, no need to report it, read above. The problem is that rc20 won't update to anything. Not a problem with rc30 as you suspect.
 
tigro11
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 68
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:31 am

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:26 pm

I have the rb 750gr3 in continuous loop, after 5 seconds reboots and makes a beep, can you restore the firmware maybe via micro sd or with the usb port?
With netinstall it does not see the cpu.
Try the ether1 on hEX (750Gr3) and connect it directly to PC.
Tips: viewtopic.php?f=13&t=131072#p643620
Hi guys, I solved with windows xp, with win10 I could not see the rb750g
 
owsugde
just joined
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:01 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:27 pm

Oh OK, I was under the impression that the problem was with updating from rc20 to rc24. Didn't know it was even worse than that.
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 1413
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Wed Feb 21, 2018 4:49 pm

Once more - if you upgrade/downgrade from 6.42rc versions below rc25 - you might (not will) experience issues. Does not matter which version you install. If you experience such problems, then Netinstall will be required. This is know problem which is already resolved. At the moment (after rc25) we have not experienced or received complaints about issues with upgrade/downgrade.
 
amokkatmt
newbie
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 3:31 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Thu Feb 22, 2018 2:23 pm

Hello. So now we can not use global variables in scripts called by or put as is in netwatch??? Is this by design now?? My scripts using global vars, now netwatch can not get/set values.
Yes, checked manuals, Mikrotik removed "policy" policy for netwatch scripts and global variables now can not be accessed. Seems like all global vars are "created by another users", so can't be accessed. Not the best upgrade IMHO...
 
Insider
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 200
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 4:51 pm
Location: Czech
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 23, 2018 1:13 pm

There is a bug in last versions, you cant usually add interface to bridge port via winbox.. Via CLI no problem
Frequency microwave transvertors, design, development, manufacture
http://Pojitko.cz
 
pe1chl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 5989
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2015 12:09 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 23, 2018 1:57 pm

There is a bug in last versions, you cant usually add interface to bridge port via winbox..
Did you update winbox too?
 
Insider
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 200
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 4:51 pm
Location: Czech
Contact:

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Fri Feb 23, 2018 2:45 pm

There is a bug in last versions, you cant usually add interface to bridge port via winbox..
Did you update winbox too?
3.12
Frequency microwave transvertors, design, development, manufacture
http://Pojitko.cz
 
buzzdee
newbie
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 1:22 pm

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sat Feb 24, 2018 10:17 pm

@jmi2
short version: With this routerOS version, if there is single client with older card like CM9, then all other clients got no change to communicate without issues.
Simply if such client is connected to AP, then mobile and notebook have horrible connectivity and LG TV and hama radio got disconnected always after few seconds.

long version: Starting with 6.37 (actually already before, if previous FWs like 6.36.4 were switched to use wireless-rep) in combination with old HW like CM9, R52 on client side, wireless channel becomes useless for all (other clients of same AP and also clients of other APs on same channel). Same issue is still there with 6.42rc20.
...
original post here

Did you check different frequencies? I had two 912UAG-5HPnD and one 411U with R52 connected to another 411U with R52 at 5200MHz with one 912 constantly dropping connection. Can't completely rule out, that nothing else was using the spectrum at that frequency but scanning for wlans at 20MHz bandwidth didn't show anything. But changing to 5220MHz stabilized the connection
 
JimmyNyholm
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2016 2:16 am
Location: Sweden

Re: v6.42rc [release candidate] is released!

Sun Feb 25, 2018 12:10 pm

Ok So I did see the wiki was updated to state the fact of HW offload on crs3xx series. So I did a new test and:
23 I H ether24                      bridge1                   yes   64     0x80         10                 10       none
24   H Core                         bridge1                   yes   64     0x80         10                 10       none
[admin@labb-mgmt-1] /interface bridge port> 
Shurely it states that the Bond in my case named Core show hardware offload....
But!:

Setting admit only taged vlan, making it part of the vlans as taged member. Adding IP and accessing stuff works for most part from bridge to other but other to bridge sort of comes and goes.
I see one odd thing in the export:
/interface ethernet
set [ find default-name=sfp-sfpplus2 ] mac-address=6C:3B:6B:ED:F8:46
/interface bridge
add igmp-snooping=yes name=bridge1 protocol-mode=none pvid=64 vlan-filtering=yes
/interface bonding
add lacp-rate=1sec min-links=1 mode=802.3ad name=Core slaves=sfp-sfpplus1,sfp-sfpplus2 transmit-hash-policy=\
    layer-3-and-4
Why do the system change the mac'adddres one of the lacp member ports? the Unit should advertise its chassiID in its LACP BDPU's but then the individual links is surly individual links. There is, as far as I can se, in winbox or cli not any way to see the lacp state is this by design or misstake or is it not ready yet.

Could you please expose lacp states to cli and winbox!.

Edit: If I activate one port 1-24 on the bridge then the switch is reachable from bonding (sfp-sfppluss1,sfp-sfpluss2) but if I remove the cable from port 1-24 the switch does not answer from bridge bonding interface anymore. Is this a bug due to new hardware offload that bridge doesn't think of the bundle as to enable the bridge ip's.
@Mikrotik do you need me to create support case or is this relevant information to do you tests?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests