Don't you have istalled dude package, do you?Its been rebooted now so it doesn't show 100%. When it is at 100% I can't pull up anything but profiler shows management as the process.
Don't you have istalled dude package, do you?Its been rebooted now so it doesn't show 100%. When it is at 100% I can't pull up anything but profiler shows management as the process.
No.Don't you have istalled dude package, do you?Its been rebooted now so it doesn't show 100%. When it is at 100% I can't pull up anything but profiler shows management as the process.
How much time you use same SoftwareID?Hello.
I read all posts here, but did not found that someone face same issue too.
I have a wide range of CCR1016 routers and routerOS based virtual routers.
The issue what i faced now is:
my cload core CCR1016-12G was able to be upgraded to newest 6.27 version with out any problems.
The upgrade was done from v6.24 to v6.27 on CCR1016
But now on virtual machines the upgrade fail.
My virtual routerOS are running v6.24 and v6.21.1.
When i go to system>packages>check for updates>download and upgrade, it tries to get latest v6.27 version, but during download it says it failed to download
isdn package.
Well this package i do not need, so i uninstalled it from mine virtual routers.
Then i repeat upgraded, download is successfull, it reboots for upgrade to be installed.
In console it writes it does the update.
No errors are given out by command line GUI.
But once router loads, and i log in to it, i see my old version v6.21.1 or v6.24
So it does not upgrade, and does not give any error.
Do not simply leave email, this is not one direct support service, open new thread and post your config.ccr1036 12G-4s v6.27 hotspot not working.i didn't look the login web. my email 2338953@qq.com
How much time you use same SoftwareID?Hello.
I read all posts here, but did not found that someone face same issue too.
I have a wide range of CCR1016 routers and routerOS based virtual routers.
The issue what i faced now is:
my cload core CCR1016-12G was able to be upgraded to newest 6.27 version with out any problems.
The upgrade was done from v6.24 to v6.27 on CCR1016
But now on virtual machines the upgrade fail.
My virtual routerOS are running v6.24 and v6.21.1.
When i go to system>packages>check for updates>download and upgrade, it tries to get latest v6.27 version, but during download it says it failed to download
isdn package.
Well this package i do not need, so i uninstalled it from mine virtual routers.
Then i repeat upgraded, download is successfull, it reboots for upgrade to be installed.
In console it writes it does the update.
No errors are given out by command line GUI.
But once router loads, and i log in to it, i see my old version v6.21.1 or v6.24
So it does not upgrade, and does not give any error.
You use Software ID downloaded from Internet?
Did you pay for license for each individual copy?Physical cloadcores run each of them with lic preinstalled.
Virtual mikrotiks, they are clones of each other.
I am using them already for couple years, and did not experienced any problems till now.
So this means if i try to get software upgrade with same ID, it will fail?
How much time you use same SoftwareID?Hello.
I read all posts here, but did not found that someone face same issue too.
I have a wide range of CCR1016 routers and routerOS based virtual routers.
The issue what i faced now is:
my cload core CCR1016-12G was able to be upgraded to newest 6.27 version with out any problems.
The upgrade was done from v6.24 to v6.27 on CCR1016
But now on virtual machines the upgrade fail.
My virtual routerOS are running v6.24 and v6.21.1.
When i go to system>packages>check for updates>download and upgrade, it tries to get latest v6.27 version, but during download it says it failed to download
isdn package.
Well this package i do not need, so i uninstalled it from mine virtual routers.
Then i repeat upgraded, download is successfull, it reboots for upgrade to be installed.
In console it writes it does the update.
No errors are given out by command line GUI.
But once router loads, and i log in to it, i see my old version v6.21.1 or v6.24
So it does not upgrade, and does not give any error.
You use Software ID downloaded from Internet?
How much time you use same SoftwareID?Hello.
I read all posts here, but did not found that someone face same issue too.
I have a wide range of CCR1016 routers and routerOS based virtual routers.
The issue what i faced now is:
my cload core CCR1016-12G was able to be upgraded to newest 6.27 version with out any problems.
The upgrade was done from v6.24 to v6.27 on CCR1016
But now on virtual machines the upgrade fail.
My virtual routerOS are running v6.24 and v6.21.1.
When i go to system>packages>check for updates>download and upgrade, it tries to get latest v6.27 version, but during download it says it failed to download
isdn package.
Well this package i do not need, so i uninstalled it from mine virtual routers.
Then i repeat upgraded, download is successfull, it reboots for upgrade to be installed.
In console it writes it does the update.
No errors are given out by command line GUI.
But once router loads, and i log in to it, i see my old version v6.21.1 or v6.24
So it does not upgrade, and does not give any error.
You use Software ID downloaded from Internet?
interface,warning 3_WIFI: bridge port received packet with own address as source address, probably loopDo not simply leave email, this is not one direct support service, open new thread and post your config.ccr1036 12G-4s v6.27 hotspot not working.i didn't look the login web. my email 2338953@qq.com
If someone want help you, you get help.
All users must benefit from helping you.
+100If you are happy with your setup, don't touch it.
interface,warning 3_WIFI: bridge port received packet with own address as source address, probably loopDo not simply leave email, this is not one direct support service, open new thread and post your config.ccr1036 12G-4s v6.27 hotspot not working.i didn't look the login web. my email 2338953@qq.com
If someone want help you, you get help.
All users must benefit from helping you.
why i got a lot of the warming message?how to fix
my ccr1036-12g-4s and a lot of other hardware buy only one week,,how to got Technical Support?
Please provide us more information about your setup. The AP or this Client router stopped working?I just upgraded to 6.27 on my RB711-5HnD and upgraded the routerboard to 3.22.
It looked good at the start so I ran a speed test at http://www.speedtest.net/.
The router disconnected, then I ran a wireless scan it shows no ap's at all.
Rebooting makes it reconnect but it disconnects as soon as I try a speed test.
Downgrading back to 6.23 make everything work again.
0 R name="wlan1" mtu=1500 mac-address=XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX arp=enabled interface-type=Atheros AR92xx mode=station-pseudobridge ssid="" frequency=5300
band=5ghz-a/n channel-width=20/40mhz-ht-below scan-list=default wireless-protocol=any wds-mode=disabled wds-default-bridge=none wds-ignore-ssid=no
bridge-mode=enabled default-authentication=yes default-forwarding=yes default-ap-tx-limit=0 default-client-tx-limit=0 hide-ssid=no
security-profile=default compression=no
If queue type is "default" Try to change default queue type to another eg from pfifo to RED. and write here if it helps.Queue Tree queues does not work in 6.27 (all counters stays on 0) (at least for GRE tunnel interfaces)
Very poor performance for single TCP flow over GRE tunnel.
simaskkk - Does problem persist if you disable/enable queues? Do you have scripts/schedulers or something else which might change queue settings while they are working?
It's possible that system didn't manage to get correct info or get anything at all from eeprom/ddmi on transceiver. In cases like that after several attempts system will give up and leave those fields empty. Replugging the module, reboot or power cycle might help.It seems that SPF status is broken on CRS-125, with no info shown except 'module present' (S-31DLC20D).
Module works correctly nevertheless.
YES! YES! YES!rextended - We finally managed to fix crash when PPPoE was being configured over EoIP. Fix should be included in 6.28rc5 and later versions of RouterOS.
Changing l2mtu on any interface of my ccr 1036-12G-4S cause port flapping, shutting down all interface, someone had same problem?What's new in 6.7 (2013-Nov-29 13:37):
*) fixed l2mtu changing on CCRs - could cause port flapping;
Although similar, this behaviour (one all interface reload after L2MTU changes) is not related to the problem in v6.7.Changing l2mtu on any interface of my ccr 1036-12G-4S cause port flapping, shutting down all interface, someone had same problem?What's new in 6.7 (2013-Nov-29 13:37):
*) fixed l2mtu changing on CCRs - could cause port flapping;
This behaviour still persist on 6.27!
The release date changed because we added "smips" RouterOS version for the hAP lite boards in the website. There are no other changes.Funny i just noticed on the download package from this site that the 6.27 software has been updated (release date is now 23-02-2015 where it was 11-02-2015) however i just cant find any changes in the changelog. And why hasnt the version number not been altered ?
Normis ?
Well last night i was try to upgrade my x86 ROS to v6.27 ...
Userman is give error like "radius server not responding" so i must fast downgrade to v6.26.
On other routerboard devices it looks that all is fine.
Can someone try to upgrade device with userman ?
same problem on two x86 routers. Local access is ok but print anything go to crash or not print. Router is not function. Same is fresh install 6.27 is same problem on same router.This is the third time
when i open winbox and goto the Interfaces
the router crash
i use simple script/scheduler to turn off interfaces on specific time
Having three mipsbe routers connected to internet:
A: running SSTP server accepting SSTP conections from B and C
B: running SSTP server and client, connecting to A and accepting connections from C
C: running SSTP client and connecting to A and B
A had 6.25, B had 6.18, C had 6.25 and everything worked fine.
Decided to update A from 6.25 to 6.27. Result: Connection from B was fine. C was not able to establish connection.
Decided to update C from 6.25 to 6.27. Result: C is not able to establish connections both to A and B. The disk1 that was working in 6.25 was renamed to disk3 and new disk1 appeared – this should not happen!
And what is more: not running SSTP clients show incoming packets and data in interface overview. How to? Torch is blank…
Reverting both A and C to 6.25 and waiting a correction. After downgrade both A and C to 6.25 everything works correctly like before.
Supout was sent to support, ticket nr. [Ticket#2015021466000104]
You dont need to add filters in firewall to gain access to your cameras.! In what LAN port is connected your camera? Are you sure that port is properly forwarded?hi guys I have a problem with this can you help me?
I didn't know how to make topic nor did I fine an appropriate place to post it so if you can help me or direct me to the best location I would appreciate it. thanks
first of all after I enable DDNS, in the status section it tells me that:
"DDNS server received request from ip ...(the public ip adress)... but your local ip was 192.168.1.6 (which is my gateway ip). DDNS service might not work."
and I can't ping the DNS name it gives me 100% timeout then I've added this command:"/ip firewall filter add action=accept chain=input disabled=no dst-port=8291 protocol=tcp place-before=0"
but this didnt help either!
what should I do?
I have ip cameras in my work place and I want to watch them from home via this feature.
can you help me?
all cameras plus computers and server are attached to a switch and one cable from switch is attached to ether 2 of my mikrotik and one cable from the dsl modem is attached to the ether1 of my mikrotik.You dont need to add filters in firewall to gain access to your cameras.! In what LAN port is connected your camera? Are you sure that port is properly forwarded?hi guys I have a problem with this can you help me?
I didn't know how to make topic nor did I fine an appropriate place to post it so if you can help me or direct me to the best location I would appreciate it. thanks
first of all after I enable DDNS, in the status section it tells me that:
"DDNS server received request from ip ...(the public ip adress)... but your local ip was 192.168.1.6 (which is my gateway ip). DDNS service might not work."
and I can't ping the DNS name it gives me 100% timeout then I've added this command:"/ip firewall filter add action=accept chain=input disabled=no dst-port=8291 protocol=tcp place-before=0"
but this didnt help either!
what should I do?
I have ip cameras in my work place and I want to watch them from home via this feature.
can you help me?
For me it works faster...MikroTik 951G-2HnD.
RouterOS v6.23
RouterOS v6.27
Awesome improvement MikroTik!
305mbit to 345mbit...
Are you sure your speedtest.net server gives full speed?
Dude open a new thread, and will found the solution for your problem. This is not right thread for this problem.all cameras plus computers and server are attached to a switch and one cable from switch is attached to ether 2 of my mikrotik and one cable from the dsl modem is attached to the ether1 of my mikrotik.You dont need to add filters in firewall to gain access to your cameras.! In what LAN port is connected your camera? Are you sure that port is properly forwarded?hi guys I have a problem with this can you help me?
I didn't know how to make topic nor did I fine an appropriate place to post it so if you can help me or direct me to the best location I would appreciate it. thanks
first of all after I enable DDNS, in the status section it tells me that:
"DDNS server received request from ip ...(the public ip adress)... but your local ip was 192.168.1.6 (which is my gateway ip). DDNS service might not work."
and I can't ping the DNS name it gives me 100% timeout then I've added this command:"/ip firewall filter add action=accept chain=input disabled=no dst-port=8291 protocol=tcp place-before=0"
but this didnt help either!
what should I do?
I have ip cameras in my work place and I want to watch them from home via this feature.
can you help me?
my internet is working on mikrotik gateway and I can ping 8.8.8.8 from winbox plus I've enabled ip cloud and it gave me the dns but I cant use it, it gave me 100% timeout. so I dont know what to do!
LaZyLion - Since 6.27 "/system package update check-for-updates" is dynamic and gives output to console. That has caused changes.
You can use command like this:
:put ([/system package update check-for-updates once as-value ] -> "current-version")
:put [/system resource get version ]
:put ([/system package update check-for-updates once as-value ] -> "latest-version")
:put ([/system package update check-for-updates once as-value ] -> "status")
resolving upgrade.mikrotik.com
/tool fetch url="something.mikrotik.com/something"
hi guys I have a problem with this can you help me?
I didn't know how to make topic nor did I fine an appropriate place to post it so if you can help me or direct me to the best location I would appreciate it. thanks
first of all after I enable DDNS, in the status section it tells me that:
"DDNS server received request from ip ...(the public ip adress)... but your local ip was 192.168.1.6 (which is my gateway ip). DDNS service might not work."
and I can't ping the DNS name it gives me 100% timeout then I've added this command:"/ip firewall filter add action=accept chain=input disabled=no dst-port=8291 protocol=tcp place-before=0"
but this didnt help either!
what should I do?
I have ip cameras in my work place and I want to watch them from home via this feature.
can you help me?
You dont need to add filters in firewall to gain access to your cameras.! In what LAN port is connected your camera? Are you sure that port is properly forwarded?
all cameras plus computers and server are attached to a switch and one cable from switch is attached to ether 2 of my mikrotik and one cable from the dsl modem is attached to the ether1 of my mikrotik.
my internet is working on mikrotik gateway and I can ping 8.8.8.8 from winbox plus I've enabled ip cloud and it gave me the dns but I cant use it, it gave me 100% timeout. so I dont know what to do!
Dude open a new thread, and will found the solution for your problem. This is not right thread for this problem.
For me 6.27 work faster than 6.24 and previous version used (USED, not only TESTED) on all my network infrastructureFor me it works faster...MikroTik 951G-2HnD.
RouterOS v6.23
RouterOS v6.27
Awesome improvement MikroTik!
305mbit to 345mbit...
Are you sure your speedtest.net server gives full speed?
I can confirm that I also had a speed hit on V 6.27. BAck to 6.19 all good again. I also noticed a degrading of voip quality. This was on a 1100AH. Personally for me with the config I use 6.19 is still the most stable. It is possibe the upgrade is not taking properly somewhere and a fresh install would be fine but I have not tested this
Hi,For anyone with the same issues. I have contacted support. I expect to hear from them soon. Below is an excerpt of what was sent.
I have a RB912UAG-5HPnD w/a Mikrotik 802.ac card with ROS 6.27 installed with the wireless-fp package active.
Ok, misspelled and fixed, thanksWhere are the seconds? I see 3 minutes difference...
So you're saying that he couldn't possibly have two devices and just swapped the devices?
the strange thing on pictures:
no one notice the differencies on minutes between the two images?
reboot the machine to start new RouterOS, and start and complete the test again after only 3 minutes???
Or I have misunderstand the images?
I save the picture for not be removed or altered: P.S.
FOR ALL USERS:
I suggest to STOP TO USE SPEEDTEST FOR DO THE TEST (if you not are the owner of the other side...)
Use two other machine to do the test properly. On this way you can also test different packet size and tipology of traffic.
You have never the warranty than the service, on the other side, are overcharged from other users...
I do not think than the various "speedtest" servers have unlimited & warranted bandwidth for you and the all the other users.
Yes is possible, but the test must be done also crossing version and routeboards, or the test are incomplete...So you're saying that he couldn't possibly have two devices and just swapped the devices?
LaZyLion - We fixed print function for "/system package update" in latest 6.28rcX versions. Now something like this might work for you:
{
/system package update check-for-updates once
delay 5
:put [/system package update get latest-version ]
}
First function will force RouterOS to check for a latest version. Delay can be reduced but must be longer than time needed to find out latest version. Last function will give latest available version of RouterOS.
[admin@my-router] > /system package update check-for-updates once
current-version: 6.27
status: resolving upgrade.mikrotik.com
[admin@my-router] > :put [/system package update get latest-version ]
input does not match any value of value-name
[poi@HotSpotAs] > sys resource print
uptime: 1h48m46s
version: 6.27
build-time: Feb/11/2015 13:24:13
free-memory: 3784.0KiB
total-memory: 32.0MiB
cpu: MIPS 24Kc V7.4
cpu-count: 1
cpu-frequency: 300MHz
cpu-load: 19%
free-hdd-space: 43.6MiB
total-hdd-space: 64.0MiB
write-sect-since-reboot: 21992
write-sect-total: 62832584
bad-blocks: 0.8%
architecture-name: mipsbe
board-name: RB450
platform: MikroTik
[poi@HotSpotAs] >
[poi@HotSpotAs] >
[poi@HotSpotAs] >
[poi@HotSpotAs] > tool profile
action timed out - try again, if error continues contact MikroTik support and send a supout file (13)
[poi@HotSpotAs] >
+1. Good question...Why 6.28rc13 has been removed?
Good question, but bad topic:+1. Good question...Why 6.28rc13 has been removed?
nop, i can't connet...poizzon, did you do what this log line asked?
I get lots of this messages on my setup ... I use capsmanv2 with multiple APs configured to provide same said over a building ... this warning pops up when client goes from one AP to another ... sometimes RSTP disables the port long enough to make CAP drop connection due to timeout and loose all of its clients which is annoying.interface,warning 3_WIFI: bridge port received packet with own address as source address, probably loop
why i got a lot of the warming message?how to fix
my ccr1036-12g-4s and a lot of other hardware buy only one week,,how to got Technical Support?
Just to let you know. This problem was confirmed by mikrotik to be an error finally.Having three mipsbe routers connected to internet:
A: running SSTP server accepting SSTP conections from B and C
B: running SSTP server and client, connecting to A and accepting connections from C
C: running SSTP client and connecting to A and B
A had 6.25, B had 6.18, C had 6.25 and everything worked fine.
Decided to update A from 6.25 to 6.27. Result: Connection from B was fine. C was not able to establish connection.
Decided to update C from 6.25 to 6.27. Result: C is not able to establish connections both to A and B. The disk1 that was working in 6.25 was renamed to disk3 and new disk1 appeared – this should not happen!
And what is more: not running SSTP clients show incoming packets and data in interface overview. How to? Torch is blank…
Reverting both A and C to 6.25 and waiting a correction. After downgrade both A and C to 6.25 everything works correctly like before.
Supout was sent to support, ticket nr. [Ticket#2015021466000104]
To this ticket. I received today info from Mikrotik support that I should have all involved ros devices at the same level (6.27). But the ticket was also about the SSTP not working between two 6.27 devices. So the advice was false.
I found the solution myself: it is the PFS option that is not documented. Correct settings allows communication between both 6.27 as between different versions (for example 6.27-6.18 or 6.27-6.25 in my case).
Mikrotik should take care about the documentation if changing/adding anything!
+1 for this.so when all_packages torrent/zip will be back?
Please contact support@mikrotik.com so we could check the configuration of the board and setup environment. Then we could try to reproduce this problem in the lab with the AC boards.hi,
I have a problem starting nstream to be unusable with ac hardware. I have swapped a RB912 with a netbox5 on a place were nstream was working really good (uptimes of clients ofthen 10-20 days before getting a not polled for too long), now it disconnects ALL clients simultainously every hour or so (not polled for too long).
wireless-fp package
a/n mode
please make nstream working stable again, for most of my sites it gives AT LEAST double tcp performace at the client side than NV2. I'm worried now about using the newest hardware as this is even less usable with nstreme than old hardware.
I can't simply downgrade all my clients to just 50% of the bandwidth just for using another protocol.
thanks
ps.: btw I have around 450 mikrotiks in use here, and I'm doing wisp since 2000
What ports do you have on bridge?interface,warning 3_WIFI: bridge port received packet with own address as source address, probably loop
why i got a lot of the warming message?how to fix
my ccr1036-12g-4s and a lot of other hardware buy only one week,,how to got Technical Support?
An error, which I don't know the meaning of, occasionally appears in the log.
I would be greateful if you could tell me if this error occurs due to a configuration fault or if someone is trying to connect but I am unable to see the IP from which it is coming from.
This started happening after upgrade 6.27, but before the update I didn't see the error.
20:32:31 ipsec,error failed to get valid proposal.
20:32:31 ipsec,error failed to pre-process ph1 packet (side: 1, status 1).
20:32:31 ipsec,error phase1 negotiation failed.
20:32:41 ipsec,error failed to get valid proposal.
20:32:41 ipsec,error failed to pre-process ph1 packet (side: 1, status 1).
20:32:41 ipsec,error phase1 negotiation failed.
20:32:51 ipsec,error failed to get valid proposal.
20:32:51 ipsec,error failed to pre-process ph1 packet (side: 1, status 1).
20:32:51 ipsec,error phase1 negotiation failed.
20:33:01 ipsec,error failed to get valid proposal.
20:33:01 ipsec,error failed to pre-process ph1 packet (side: 1, status 1).
20:33:01 ipsec,error phase1 negotiation failed.
20:33:05 ipsec,error phase1 negotiation failed due to time up X.X.X.X[500]<=>Z.Z.Z.Z[500] 5654bdb3a0805b43:00000000000000
20:33:05 ipsec,error failed to get valid proposal.
20:33:05 ipsec,error failed to pre-process ph1 packet (side: 1, status 1).
20:33:05 ipsec,error phase1 negotiation failed.
Do you have any SNAT on the network path from SSTP client to SSTP server which is configured out of SSTP client?Just to let you know. This problem was confirmed by mikrotik to be an error finally.
After my further investigation, it is not linked to PFS nor to ros versions mismatch nor to SSTP only, as it also happens to L2TP. The basic of the problem lies in the dynamically assigned IP to the client device that suddenly becomes ivalid without any obvious reason at the clients ip address list.
For those who suffer by this problem like me, you can switch off the sstp/l2tp client, remove the invalid addresses from address lists, reboot the client and switch on the sstp/l2tp client. Then it should behave good at least for some time...
I have got a message that it was passed to programmers for correction. Hope it will be included in 6.28.
Hey, can we please have the .torrent files back for ALL RouterOS. I don't believe that I am the only one that uses the .torrent to download RouterOS. I myself support multiple different hardware flavors and to download each file separately can be a pain.
Thanks!
Hey, can we please have the .torrent files back for ALL RouterOS. I don't believe that I am the only one that uses the .torrent to download RouterOS. I myself support multiple different hardware flavors and to download each file separately can be a pain.
Thanks!
Not only are you! Mikrotik: please come back torrent download!
I did copying the .npk file as always, I have no way to do netinstall from remote location where I am some 500km from the device.Steen, did you try Netinstall or just copying .npk files?
For me, 6.27 is a good release. I have it running on couple of routerboards and on those never had kernel panics, sudden reboots or resets. Everything that i have set on earlier releases (5.x) working like a charm. Big plus from me!
And the reason is in Log, isn't it?I had cases where i copy .npk files and then after reboot, device simply wont upgrade
If you can netinstall the router I would do that. If not, you might try upgrading to 6.25 and then go to 6.27.Hello Folks!
Trying to upgrade CCR1016 from 6.24 to 6.27 failed due to kernel panic, and it reverted back to 6.24 again and support was generated. I put up a support case to MT with support file.
Anyone who have seen this and or know how to mitigate it ?
Try -please help me, someone can tell me where I find the download version 6.27 parael npk ccr1036-12G -4S