any model with at least 64mb ram?Oh my God!
hAP = 2.4 ГГц, MIMO 2x2, 802.11n (b/g/n) + 650 MHz + 100Mbit + PoE (in/out) + USB
hAP ac lite = 2.4 ГГц, MIMO 2x2, 802.11n (b/g/n) + 5 ГГц, 1 канал, 802.11ac + 650 MHz + 100Mbit + PoE (in/out) + USB
hAP ac = 2.4 ГГц, MIMO 2x2, 802.11n (b/g/n) + 5 ГГц, 3 канала, 802.11ac + 720 MHz + 1000Mbit + PoE (in/out) + USB + SFP
Oh my God!
hAP = 2.4 ГГц, MIMO 2x2, 802.11n (b/g/n) + 650 MHz + 100Mbit + PoE (in/out) + USB
hAP ac lite = 2.4 ГГц, MIMO 2x2, 802.11n (b/g/n) + 5 ГГц, 1 канал, 802.11ac + 650 MHz + 100Mbit + PoE (in/out) + USB
hAP ac = 2.4 ГГц, MIMO 2x2, 802.11n (b/g/n) + 5 ГГц, 3 канала, 802.11ac + 720 MHz + 1000Mbit + PoE (in/out) + USB + SFP
any model with at least 64mb ram?
Your best bet would be to run the hotspot captive portal on another device, then bridge the wireless of the hAP to the interface of the device running the hotspotIt seems like a nice Router. Having RouterOS with such a low price is tempting which leads me to buy this very soon.
But before buying it, I wanted to ask few questions from those who have it already:
1. My main purpose for buying it is using "hot spot" functionality. I saw npk packages available for this new architecture and hotspot was included. but how is the performance? Good enough for max 10 users with limited speed and total bandwidth?
2. since enabling hotspot creates some files on Router's limited storage (html files, etc), am i gonna have problems on storage capacity?
3. Is it possible to use/create some lightly modified hotspot pages? i need to make one in my language and little more info on the page.
4. Am I gonna have storage issues after few months (growing size of default enabled logs, if any?)?
5. Looking at Product's page, I see wifi tx is 20dbm for 6mbps (21.5 considering antenna). this is impressive when compared to RB951-2n and mAP-2n which are weaker and have twice the price. Is it as impressive as it seems? no typo on product page?
Sorry for asking lots of questions. Thanks in advance for anyone who read this far
The only thing I see there is lack of RAM and storage. I'm not sure how powerfull CPU is there in sense of VPN encrypting, or L7 detection, but L7 and shaping should like RAM, am I wrong? Not huge RAM, right, but I see some like 1-2 Mb free...It is working perfectly with this
You can do traffic shapping, priorities, L7, VPN (I am using one for IPSEC/L2TP client),
NetInstall, I think... but this isn't a good way, yes.I'd prefer to have some way to downgrade or upgrade firmwares.
I think upgrades (and maybe downgrades too) are made from ram.Got strange expression for this small device: it have no flash to downgrade ROS version!
May I please ask for which way can I do that? I used to use drag&drop files into Winbox window, and I suspect it goes directly into /flash.I think upgrades (and maybe downgrades too) are made from ram.Got strange expression for this small device: it have no flash to downgrade ROS version!
Just put the NPK into the main folder (instead of /flash) and there you go.
+1What is there to be disappointed. It is a small device with little RAM. Do you miss NTP server on a home router? Than you can always chose RB951Ui-2HnDI compared contents of the software and was disappointed.
As Caci99 say:
It have 32MB RAM and only 16MB NAND. There is no space for LCD, NTP server, Calea, multicast and others...
It is low cost wifi router for home use. Only $21.95 !
If you need - there is RB951Ui or RB951G
Something that needed to be written in bold font on Download page, isn't it?One of he most common mistakes of a beginner RouterOS user, is to install all the packages. You don't need even half of them.
You don't even need the routing package, it is only for OSPF/BGP, and home user doesn't need it on the hAP.
- LCD package is not needed for ANY RouterBOARD because they don't support the parallel port LCD modules that the package is made for.
- NTP package is needed only to run the server.
- you can't use CALEA on the hAP because it doesn't support external drives
This is not my case. I install always only the packages I need. I also do not understand why mikrotik preinstalls the not necessary packages during the manufacturing process and just disables them. There should be only packages advanced tools, dhcp, security, system and wireless-fp (if applicable) installed on the newly distributed devices and let the users to install additional packages if they need. But it is not so normally.One of he most common mistakes of a beginner RouterOS user, is to install all the packages. You don't need even half of them.
You don't even need the routing package, it is only for OSPF/BGP, and home user doesn't need it on the hAP.
- LCD package is not needed for ANY RouterBOARD because they don't support the parallel port LCD modules that the package is made for.
- NTP package is needed only to run the server.
- you can't use CALEA on the hAP because it doesn't support external drives
So why are you not selling the devices like that?what is 'default' and what is 'extra' depends on the device. RB750 may not need Wireless, but others do need it.
for standard operation of a router without wireless - only the system package is needed.
Maybe the router is simply not fit for your purpose? If 32MB of RAM is not enough, you simply need a stronger device. hAP works fine for a home or small office environment, it doesn't need more than this amount of RAM.This is not my case. I install always only the packages I need. I also do not understand why mikrotik preinstalls the not necessary packages during the manufacturing process and just disables them. There should be only packages advanced tools, dhcp, security, system and wireless-fp (if applicable) installed on the newly distributed devices and let the users to install additional packages if they need. But it is not so normally.One of he most common mistakes of a beginner RouterOS user, is to install all the packages. You don't need even half of them.
You don't even need the routing package, it is only for OSPF/BGP, and home user doesn't need it on the hAP.
- LCD package is not needed for ANY RouterBOARD because they don't support the parallel port LCD modules that the package is made for.
- NTP package is needed only to run the server.
- you can't use CALEA on the hAP because it doesn't support external drives
Above that I need only PPP mostly. And with this package combination the 32MB of ram is just not enough manytimes.
I'd really say it is tricky for newcomers to "feel" the way Mikrotik community member should live.Here is some more info about the package functions:
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Sy ... S_packages
download package has been slightly updated to improve usability.I'd really say it is tricky for newcomers to "feel" the way Mikrotik community member should live.Here is some more info about the package functions:
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Sy ... S_packages
If home devices are for no-brainer setup and easy maintain afterward why not to renew site (at least for 'home' devices) so people won't need to read whole wiki (including outdated posts) to catch the idea behind ROS approach.
I've just login to some 941 device I have setup for a friend of mine. I see the following packages enabled:I have some rb941s, they work so far good, even I am not excited by them, but for the price... This discussion about the preinstalled combined packages is quite other topic. Maybe you should reduce the content of combined packages, or stop using them at all and install only few individual packages as I suggested above.
Yes is it, and mostly this is so. But as someone mentioned before if we need to work with huge sized certificates we may need more RAM. But ok, this is not the Mikrotik fault9MB is completely OK for the normal operation of the hAP lite.
Just tried, but it says I can not uninstall bundled package (which is reasonable). I'd love to so save some flash, but...You cannot disable system. Security only affects SSH and secure Winbox. See manual: http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:System/Packages
Actually uninstall could be better than just disable. Will also free some space.
1) Just to check my mind: if I get "extra" zip, upload only "system", and reboot the device, the flash will be free from "main" solid image completely?Yes, to get rid of the bundle, next time you upgrade to a new version, do it by hand, using only the "extra packages" zip file, and upload only "system" + what you need
Just tried. No good at all, the device image stay intact. Any trick that I forgot?1. yes
Do you have version archive so I can get older version for my device, downgrade it, the upload "system" from newer (current) version so I reach the same result without waiting for the next versionyou need a newer version. uploading current version will give result "already installed"
Can confirm this works. I've downgraded my router to 6.28 (which I found in the recent downloads on PC), then uploaded 6.29.1 system module only and after the reboot I got nicely stripped version of firmware. Thanks!Easier just to upgrade to the RC: http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... .30rc7.zip
Yes, it is so, but I see no "CAP" button in CAPsMAN window when wireless-cm2 is installed. Without wireless-cm2 there is no CAPsMAN link in menu at all. At the same time I see "Manager" button in that window, so it looks like this device can only be controller, which is silly idea to believe ).wireless-cm2 package is in the hAP lite by default
it is also inside the all-packages.zip file (or "extra packages" on our download page)
Winbox only, and I have only system, ppp, dhcp and winreless modules enabled. There is no second wireless module of any kind. Should I supply screenshots? I've just disconnected the router but I'll start it again if any.do you use Webfig, Winbox or console? make sure you don't have multiple wireless packages installed at once
Sorry, I was wrong. I was seeking 'CAP' button in CAPsMAN window while it was in Wireless (of course!).wireless is the wrong package, you need wireless-cm2. Yes, please post a screenshot
Or at least some Small POE powered VDSL modems, it seems there is not a POE DSL modem, maybe they're to power hungry for that?MIkrotik would not produce ADSL product but I will realy like to see some.
Hate to have 2 devices ADSL(bridge) + Mikrotik at client place.
I had 6.30rc13 at the time of the test with wireless-cm2 package.In first message I stated that I'd finally copied those rules from dynamically created (i.e. UPNP created) 'dummy' ones. Via button 'Copy' in Winbox. And had checked many times it identical in content. And UDP version of rules seems working (packet counter grows up).
BTW, which soft version is on your box? Is it 941-2nd?
If you face a serious trouble, mostly it means the reason of it simply stupid. My provider actually gives me a local IP instead of static. All ports were closed all the time on incoming traffic. uTorrent network state detection obviously working incorrectly by showing open port when it was actually closed. That's misleads me from real trouble source. Thanks anyway for your kindness and willingness to help.I had 6.30rc13 at the time of the test with wireless-cm2 package.
your NAT observations are mystery to me, sorry!
I tried the iPhone charger and I still have the broken wifi issue. I switched "Wireless Protocol" from "Any" to "802.11" and all my devices reconnected.I'm having an issue with my hap lite. It appears to be very sensitive to power issues. Whenever power is restored and the UPS switches back from battery to mains, the wifi on the hap lite stops working properly. Nothing else connected to the UPS is affected (computer doesn't reboot. DSL modem doesn't restart, etc). The hap's log shows nothing strange, it doesn't restart or anything. BUT after mains is restored, all devices connected by wifi drop the wifi connection and doesn't reconnect. When manually trying to connect an iPhone again to the wifi, I am asked for a password (even though the stored password is correct and worked a few seconds ago) and then, after entering the password, I get "Incorrect Password". All my devices and computers do this. I disabled en re-enabled the wlan1 wireless interface but the "Incorrect password" problem still persist. So far I've only found two ways to fix the problem. Clicking "Reset Configuration" on wlan1 and redoing the wifi configuration is one way that works. The other way is to completely remove power and reconnect it.
I can understand that there might be some strange power artefact when the UPS switches back to mains (even though nothing else is affected), but I find it strange that only the wifi stops working on the hap.
I'm going to try using an iPhone charger's USB instead of the factory supplied power adapter tomorrow and report back.
That's my thoughts too. Going to buy one for this exact purpose.I think it is a perfect tool in my travel bag...
With two chains is it possible to use the hAP lite as WLAN AP and WLAN client at the same time?Has one less Ethernet port, but two Wireless chains instead of One. It is also cheaper and has faster CPU.
Noup is not possible. Radio can work in one state in one time. So if work as AP, CPE mode is disabled and cannot be used and backward.With two chains is it possible to use the hAP lite as WLAN AP and WLAN client at the same time?Has one less Ethernet port, but two Wireless chains instead of One. It is also cheaper and has faster CPU.
Because I would like to buy the "hAP lite" for traveling. I would like to let the hAP connect to the foreign WLAN and then connect all my devices with my own WLAN.
Thanks
That is not related with hAP Lite. RouterOS support MESH topology, and is available in hAP Also. So you can use hAP lite for MESH networking.Does the hAP lite support MESH networking? I would like to setup several of these in a mesh sensor network. thanks.
I'm considering to get one for myself, but I'm still undecided because I read somewhere that wifi coverage is not so good. Can you tell me your experience?I had to temporarily put it on my home network while my RB493G was out of action due to a bad power supply. I was really surprised to see it handles my home traffic fine. Even at only 5 volts.
I'm buy this a week ago. This device is small, but powerfull enough to deliver wifi on my home 200m2 (divided by 8 area with cement+stone partition). My house is 1 floor which consist of:I'm considering to get one for myself, but I'm still undecided because I read somewhere that wifi coverage is not so good. Can you tell me your experience?I had to temporarily put it on my home network while my RB493G was out of action due to a bad power supply. I was really surprised to see it handles my home traffic fine. Even at only 5 volts.
I did something bad and I can´t join to the routerboard. With this procedure I recover the access to my hAP lite MUMco editionto reset, do it like this:Anybody can help me i tried many time to reset i hold button for 15 second and even more but still my router redirect to hotspot even to access main ip 192.168.88.1 and also i cant ping 192.168.88.1 at all. please help me any way i can reset hap lite directly on board if reset button not work like my situation !!
- turn off hAP (unplug)
- push reset button and hold it
- plug power (turn on hAP)
- keep holding button until you see one of the LEDs flashing
- release button
you can also try to start holding the button right AFTER plugging power.
Thanks Normis,RB951Ui-2HnD has small metallic antennas inside. hAP lite has PCB antennas on the board. RB951 should have slightly better coverage, but for a hotel room, hAP Lite would be better, because it is smaller, and coverage is already more than enough. RB951Ui could be too strong for one room only.
xDSL is a technology from the day before yesterday.A routerboard xDSL modem would be awesome!
I didn't mean to offend you, sorry if I did.I really despise it when people 'downvote' feature (or hardware in this case) requests just because they don't need them personally.
None taken. It's just that I generally don't 'downvote' (in quotes, since it wasn't really a proper feature request) stuff that I don't use or care about, unless they will interfere with my workflow. So when I see people being negative about other peoples' requests I just don't get it. Sorry if I was offensive too, I just get frustrated when this happens.I didn't mean to offend you, sorry if I did.
xDSL is a technology from the day before yesterday.A routerboard xDSL modem would be awesome!
I don't think Mikrotik has any market prospects in this area.
+1xDSL is a technology from the day before yesterday.A routerboard xDSL modem would be awesome!
I don't think Mikrotik has any market prospects in this area.
totally agree i think gpon its much more important, of course xdsl has a millions of users but its legacy
New case for hAP lite.
Very NICE Mikrotik
hAP Lite RB941 2nD TC
Me for example. And I wrote that already on this forum.New case for hAP lite.
Very NICE Mikrotik
hAP Lite RB941 2nD TC
Is anyone else disappointed by this? I love the hAP, but this forces it to be a vertical device, which I rarely ever see actually used -- at least not in the hundreds of users I support.
I loved the original hAP case, but this is too consumerish for my tastes. Just my opinion.
Ok, thanks. When I'm enterring my login and password of PPPoE-connection, the "pppoe status" shows that "couldn't connect to pppoe-server". All other specifications - default.Yes, of course. Right from the QuickSet page:
of courseIs the ISP internet cable plugged into the first port of the device?
I, for one like that he new version. They seem more stable on the desktop and in vogue. Kudos to Tik!I am glad I got my hands on the 'old cased' hAP!
It fits like a charm behind my laptop screen. The new design is cumbersome.
One of the reasons many manufacturers go with the standing design, is to encourage people to use the device in open space, to improve your wireless signal and decrease noise. When hidden behind walls inside a metal cabinet, next to your electricity breaker, the wireless connection will not be great, and the user will just complainI don't wanna see it on furniture, i'd rather have it stuffed it behind on a wall
I always assumed hAP Lite is a pure entry-level consumer device. Cheap and with limited resources on board. And QuickSet, while not perfect, allows to quickly set it up by a non-professional in a typical consumer scenarios.Really wish they'd have both. The new one is way too consumer looking. Is that really the market here?
You're right, but not everyone uses it like thisOne of the reasons many manufacturers go with the standing design, is to encourage people to use the device in open space, to improve your wireless signal and decrease noise. When hidden behind walls inside a metal cabinet, next to your electricity breaker, the wireless connection will not be great, and the user will just complain
If it needs to stand, chances are, you will put it outside a wall cabinet, on a desk somewhere. Having a wall mountable unit, increases chance of use inside a metal wall cabinet, next to electricity breaker somewhere.Having the sphere antenna characteristics, there is no need to have the box in the standing position.
We are happy to announce our new low cost home AP, the hAP lite:
http://routerboard.com/RB941-2nD
Recommended list price is $21.95
Not at all. You are not able to reach it too? I see it normally when backups run, for example. Quite common situation.Blowhard
mAP 2n is much-much better for on-the-road needs. The only advantage of hAP lite is it's price tag, but I doubt that would be a deciding factor for an average frequent traveler.For me, I think hAP lite is a perfectly suitable for on-the-road needs, more than for a household with more demands that are likely to stretch its capacity. Viewed in this way, standing up does no more useful purposes than 'sitting down' of the original case.
Can use integrated traffic per user in Hotspot without user menager.Ok. For this case you would need userman. Look for some other (not smips) routerboard.
Hi,
is the hAP lite enough powerful for internet link 50Mbit/s / 5Mbit/s used by the five home users?
Thank you in advance.
RouterOS 6.32.3 ? Wlan 2GHz-B/G/N, 20/40MHz ?Hello
I brought RB941-2n.
But I noticed that I cannot connect with some (cheap) phones and tablets.
I’m not sure about the reason but there is an issue with this board and some phones.
Also if you are in Europe or somewhere that allows the use of channels 12,13 make sure you're not actually using them, some devices forget that not everywhere prohibits their use.Change to 20 MHz only and see the difference! Some phones dont understand 40 MHz.
Just remove fasttrack rules from your firewall configuration.On the new model , stand upright ,can not to configure my queue tree correctly.
dec/30/2015 01:20:26 system,error,critical System rebooted because of kernel failure
dec/30/2015 01:20:26 system,error,critical Out of memory condition was detected
dec/30/2015 01:20:26 system,error,critical router was rebooted without proper shutdown
dec/30/2015 09:28:27 system,error,critical router was rebooted without proper shutdown by watchdog timer
That post was for the older version(without -tc) and I was hoping they changed it for the new version.@rrwakc: no metarouter option is available in Winbox for RB-941-2nd-tc. I checked with my unit. It's also been mentioned earlier in this thread iirc.
I just bought a hAP ac router. I couldn't log into it's default IP @ and had to go through this factory-reset-like procedure... not so great first impression on a new product I'm afraid... hopefully just "bad luck"to reset, do it like this:Anybody can help me i tried many time to reset i hold button for 15 second and even more but still my router redirect to hotspot even to access main ip 192.168.88.1 and also i cant ping 192.168.88.1 at all. please help me any way i can reset hap lite directly on board if reset button not work like my situation !!
- turn off hAP (unplug)
- push reset button and hold it
- plug power (turn on hAP)
- keep holding button until you see one of the LEDs flashing
- release button
you can also try to start holding the button right AFTER plugging power.
You are confusing MikroTik RouterOS (which is the operating system) with the Routerboard brand (which is the hardware you bought).I just bought a hAP ac router. I couldn't log into it's default IP @ and had to go through this factory-reset-like procedure... not so great first impression on a new product I'm afraid... hopefully just "bad luck"
I did follow the very simple instructions step by step The factory reset procedure solved the issue (did not connect to another port...). I'm not judging the HW. Actually I'm pretty satisfied with it after spending some time exploring the configurations. It's a pretty impressive small box.You are confusing MikroTik RouterOS (which is the operating system) with the Routerboard brand (which is the hardware you bought).I just bought a hAP ac router. I couldn't log into it's default IP @ and had to go through this factory-reset-like procedure... not so great first impression on a new product I'm afraid... hopefully just "bad luck"
You can't judge the hardware based on the default configuration of the OS (which works perfectly fine btw - if you follow the instructions)
It's like judging a new laptop by the pre-installed crapware it comes with by its vendor!
Most likely you didn't follow the instructions and connected your computer on the first port which is the 'wan' port using the default configuration.
Eitherway, doing a netinstall on a brand new routerboard is standard procedure for me.
Like when buying a new laptop and re-installing Windows (or Linux) from scratch
hAP lite's wireless is very low powered, and keeping the device vertical somewhat improves the signal. May be that's why they redesigned its' case and made it vertical.Please bring back the old case design. The new standup case looks so silly. Also, does not wall mount well.
Not to be argumentative, but do you expect users to keep it in the right orientation? I found a seller who has the older case design, so I'm happy to be getting them.hAP lite's wireless is very low powered, and keeping the device vertical somewhat improves the signal. May be that's why they redesigned its' case and made it vertical.
You can't make topics in the Accouncement section. Please make a new topic in one of the other sectionsSorry, but I no more see how post a new topic...
I have Fiber or xDSL line > RB3011 (NAT/masquerade) > Ubiquiti CPE with no problem with NAT for DVRs, hAP lite port 80.
Only port 8291 for winbox it seems impossible to access from external. I am sure, based on tests, that it's Ubiquiti that stops it, but WHY?
HAP ports setup is OK also because as default. Winbox and hAP FW last versions. Where is the stop then? Thanks to all
please be more specific as to what kind of problem you are facing when configure multi-wanGood morning, I am new with respect to Mikrotik, and bought a HAP-2nd RB941-TC Lite and I've tried everything to make it work with 2 Wan ports and a Lan and Wifi. Follow various procedures router configuration-OS and everything seems ok, but does not work the 2 wan ports. Someone with this model managed to configure 2 wan ports with fail-over or loadbalance?
In Switch, all ports are whith state as: "vlan mode disabled" and the bridge is the Wireless whith the Lan.Remove the ports from switch / bridge to have them alone. Otherwise you cannot use them independently as wan ports.
please be more specific as to what kind of problem you are facing when configure multi-wanGood morning, I am new with respect to Mikrotik, and bought a HAP-2nd RB941-TC Lite and I've tried everything to make it work with 2 Wan ports and a Lan and Wifi. Follow various procedures router configuration-OS and everything seems ok, but does not work the 2 wan ports. Someone with this model managed to configure 2 wan ports with fail-over or loadbalance?
is configured on eth1 (wan) with the name of 01net, eth2 (lan) with 02lan in bridge with the wlan, eth3 (wan2) as 03gvt and eth4 (not used) as ether4. It turns out that when the wan 01net falls, users no longer have internet access over the wan 03gvt even though on the routes the pcc
Are you sure about this one :All credentials are fake like sdfadfasdf
/ppp secret add name=vpn password=dudako346456
OK, sorry for the insistence.it isn't dudako346456
Can you please tellme were my setup is wrong pleaseIt's not a problem of modele but of setup
Envoyé de mon SM-G925F en utilisant Tapatalk
Several things:Can you please tellme were my setup is wrong please
/interface ethernet switch port
set 0 default-vlan-id=1
set 2 default-vlan-id=2
/ip address
add address=10.1.1.2/24 comment=defconf interface=02lan network=10.1.1.0
Yeah hAP Lite can do itI have AP (groove, L4) with home LAN & internet access. Now I would like to add another AP which can bridge LAN to this WiFi and work as AP + isolated AP (for guests) at the same time. Is hAP lite OK for such task?
Can anyone send me an functional export of a harp lite with 2 wan a lan in bridge wit the wifi and the loadbalance and failover functional?
It is. But always take into account that all ethernets share common 100Mbit lane to the CPU and the CPU is not the fastest ever at all...Can this box be use to do a Dual WAN? Switch/ over/ Failover and /or Bandwidth Bonding? - Is that a function of the Router OS Level rather the box? Please guide. Thanks.
We have a 1 or 2 machines at a remote dusty workshop type location (where the DSL is crappy & the backup 3G USB modem is nothing better either) where putting anything expensive or complex (subject to maintenance) is out of the question.
Thanks. True. The performance wont be phenomenal, but the location does not have the bandwidth anyways. So, at the cost of a consumer router I'd prefer the HabLite.It is. But always take into account that all ethernets share common 100Mbit lane to the CPU and the CPU is not the fastest ever at all...Can this box be use to do a Dual WAN? Switch/ over/ Failover and /or Bandwidth Bonding? - Is that a function of the Router OS Level rather the box? Please guide. Thanks.
We have a 1 or 2 machines at a remote dusty workshop type location (where the DSL is crappy & the backup 3G USB modem is nothing better either) where putting anything expensive or complex (subject to maintenance) is out of the question.
The bridge is trivial, the fail over is not difficult, but multi WAN is a thorny issue regardless of what router you select. You cannot simply configure the router to route traffic to either WAN indiscriminately, because it breaks stateful protocols such as HTTPS and others. You must sit down and manually make decisions as to what traffic will normally use which WAN, either by traffic type, source, or target; and then configure mangle rules and discretionary routing tables to ensure that all of this type of traffic goes to the same WAN all the time (subject to fail over). Everyone has to make these choices for himself depending on his own traffic characteristics, which is why there is no cookbook answer to this problem.If possible to do the above, I'd love to partake in this as well. Thanks.Can anyone send me an functional export of a harp lite with 2 wan a lan in bridge wit the wifi and the loadbalance and failover functional?
Thanks. Also, is there a chart for the various models that compares/ shows WAN to LAN throughout performance so people may choose appropriate device?The bridge is trivial, the fail over is not difficult, but multi WAN is a thorny issue regardless of what router you select. You cannot simply configure the router to route traffic to either WAN indiscriminately, because it breaks stateful protocols such as HTTPS and others. You must sit down and manually make decisions as to what traffic will normally use which WAN, either by traffic type, source, or target; and then configure mangle rules and discretionary routing tables to ensure that all of this type of traffic goes to the same WAN all the time (subject to fail over). Everyone has to make these choices for himself depending on his own traffic characteristics, which is why there is no cookbook answer to this problem.If possible to do the above, I'd love to partake in this as well. Thanks.Can anyone send me an functional export of a harp lite with 2 wan a lan in bridge wit the wifi and the loadbalance and failover functional?
Since this topic is not specific to the hAP lite, you should search the forum for other threads that deal with it, and discuss it there.
Not all in one place, I think, but at routerboard.com every device has a data sheet that shows bit and packet throughput for various configurations. In general, you get what you pay for.is there a chart for the various models that compares/ shows WAN to LAN throughout performance so people may choose appropriate device?
Of course, but wouldn't a product matrix + benchmarks be favorable for prospective and existing customers (and the Product seller/ Maker) so that they can easily choose the product of the right fit and scale. Going through each data sheet is like saying that we wont have a unified view on our product portfolio.Not all in one place, I think, but at routerboard.com every device has a data sheet that shows bit and packet throughput for various configurations. In general, you get what you pay for.is there a chart for the various models that compares/ shows WAN to LAN throughout performance so people may choose appropriate device?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lowest cost MikroTik cased unit with gigabit and multiple ports is hAP ac2. There are none powered by USB +5V. Go to https://mikrotik.com/products/group/wir ... and-office#! and use the filters in the left column to choose gigabit.Just got one, I haven't tested it out yet but I like the form factor a lot.
It's great for temp. use / live event / field testing or troubleshooting. No need to worry whether there's spare outlet, great for IoT. If there's a USB port it will work.
I did think about mAP but this has just enough RJ45 ports for simple port mirroring, or act as a switch to control several things together, ie LED display panel.
I really hope it has Gigabit Eth ports, as some of my gear must use them, otherwise it won't even connect and get an IP address. Is it the price point or the 5V USB supply keeping GbE ports away from it? I would really like to hear.
I work in a SI company offering professional audio/video-engineering solutions, so I think this is a great product for field deployment, as well as a great tool to learn the underlying protocols, how my things actually works
Lowest cost MikroTik cased unit with gigabit and multiple ports is hAP ac2. There are none powered by USB +5V. Go to https://mikrotik.com/products/group/wir ... and-office#! and use the filters in the left column to choose gigabit.Just got one, I haven't tested it out yet but I like the form factor a lot.
It's great for temp. use / live event / field testing or troubleshooting. No need to worry whether there's spare outlet, great for IoT. If there's a USB port it will work.
I did think about mAP but this has just enough RJ45 ports for simple port mirroring, or act as a switch to control several things together, ie LED display panel.
I really hope it has Gigabit Eth ports, as some of my gear must use them, otherwise it won't even connect and get an IP address. Is it the price point or the 5V USB supply keeping GbE ports away from it? I would really like to hear.
I work in a SI company offering professional audio/video-engineering solutions, so I think this is a great product for field deployment, as well as a great tool to learn the underlying protocols, how my things actually works
Power consumption of GbE chipsets.Just want to know why USB power and GbE don't mix together, is it because of the price, or technical challenges like 5V simply not sufficient for GbE? Since it seems all USB-powered only have FE available (mAP, mAP lite and hAP lite)
It is only a matter of time. As things get smaller power consumption will eventually decrease and passive cooling will be possible.Ever wondered why there is no passively cooled 10G switches?
Oh I see......hope they'll release one with USB-C in futurePower consumption of GbE chipsets.Just want to know why USB power and GbE don't mix together, is it because of the price, or technical challenges like 5V simply not sufficient for GbE? Since it seems all USB-powered only have FE available (mAP, mAP lite and hAP lite)
Ever wondered why there is no passively cooled 10G switches?
Thanks for that Link & Filter. Atleast something positive in terms of "Product Filtering"Lowest cost MikroTik cased unit with gigabit and multiple ports is hAP ac2. There are none powered by USB +5V. Go to https://mikrotik.com/products/group/wir ... and-office#! and use the filters in the left column to choose gigabit.Just got one, I haven't tested it out yet but I like the form factor a lot.
It's great for temp. use / live event / field testing or troubleshooting. No need to worry whether there's spare outlet, great for IoT. If there's a USB port it will work.
I did think about mAP but this has just enough RJ45 ports for simple port mirroring, or act as a switch to control several things together, ie LED display panel.
I really hope it has Gigabit Eth ports, as some of my gear must use them, otherwise it won't even connect and get an IP address. Is it the price point or the 5V USB supply keeping GbE ports away from it? I would really like to hear.
I work in a SI company offering professional audio/video-engineering solutions, so I think this is a great product for field deployment, as well as a great tool to learn the underlying protocols, how my things actually works
Or, if amount of RAM and storage offered by RB450Gx4 is not needed, a RBD52G (with wireless disabled) might be considered as well ... comes with a case and lower price-tag while offering same wired performance.Something like RB450Gx4 ...?
So how would I troubleshoot a RB951-2nD that keeps booting on its own-I cannot log in to them even after a hard reset. Also others have 'internet port'-port 1, blinking even with no ethernet cable plugged in. Another which seem not to be getting enough juice i am assuming the power supply on the PCB has an issue?yes, it is a SMIPSAny word on NAND storage? Is it going to be like a normal RouterBoard with somewhere between 32-64MiB minimum, or is it going to be more like an mAP in that respect, with the same kind of software update procedure as an mAP?
-- NathanCode: Select alltotal-hdd-space: 16.0MiB
Based on this and this Why people pair UBNT APs with MikroTik routers? Then..And after 6 years still the same ...we don't have any beamforming products yet.