Community discussions

 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24268
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

v6.28 final RC testing

Wed Mar 18, 2015 1:45 pm

We have fixed most important issues and the version will be released this week, if possible, please test this version and let us know of any remaining issues, so we can address them. Thanks!

Tilera: http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... latest.npk
smips for hAP: http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... latest.npk
mips: http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... latest.npk
x86: http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... latest.npk
ppc: http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... latest.npk
all: http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... latest.zip

What's new in 6.28rc14 (2015-Mar-17 15:41):

*) tile - rare situation when CCR devices failed to auto-negotiate ethernet link (introduced in v6.25);
*) route - using ldp could cause connected routes with
invalid interface nexthop;
*) added support for SiS 190/191 PCI Ethernet adapter;
*) made metarouter work on boards with 802.11ac support or usb LTE;
*) sstp server - allow ADH only when no certificate set;
*) make fat32 disk formatting support disks bigger than 134GiB;
*) fixed tunnels - could crash when clamp-tcp-mss was enabled;
*) added basic counters for ipv4/bridge fast path, also show status weather fast
path is active at all;
*) console - added 'comment' parameter for '/system script'
*) api - return sentences can have property ~.section~ that groups values
from commands such as ~monitor~, ~traceroute~,
~print~ (with non-zero 'interval' value);
*) cloud - add time zone detection feature ~/system clock time-zone-autodetect~;
*) cloud - rename ~/ip cloud enabled~ to ~/ip cloud ddns-enabled~;
*) cloud - make ~/ip cloud update-time~ independent from ~/ip cloud ddns-enabled~
*) cloud - when setting ~/ip cloud ddns-enabled~ to ~no~ router will send
message to server to disable DNS name for this routerboard;
*) cloud - ~/ip cloud force-update~ command now will work also when
~/ip cloud ddns-enabled = no~. usefull if user wants to disable DDNS;
*) RB4xxGL - improved ethernet throughput (less dropped packets);
*) trafflow: - fixed crash on disable;
*) pppoe - fixed crash when big ppp packets with were sent over EOIP;
*) tilegx - fixed memory leak when queue settings are changed;
*) ar9888 - fixed crash when hw reports invalid rate;
*) console - fixed "in" operator in console;
*) console - make "/system package update print" work again.
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
User avatar
boen_robot
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2411
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 4:43 pm
Location: europe://Bulgaria/Plovdiv

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Wed Mar 18, 2015 2:35 pm

The change log is STILL very broken, in that it says things from 6.27. Compare
What's new in 6.27 (2015-Feb-11 13:24):

*) console - added 'comment' parameter for '/system script'
*) api - return sentences can have property ".section" that groups values
from commands such as "monitor", "traceroute",
"print" (with non-zero 'interval' value);
*) cloud - add time zone detection feature "/system clock time-zone-autodetect";
*) cloud - rename "/ip cloud enabled" to "/ip cloud ddns-enabled";
*) cloud - make "/ip cloud update-time" independent from "/ip cloud ddns-enabled"
*) cloud - when setting "/ip cloud ddns-enabled" to "no" router will send
message to server to disable DNS name for this routerboard;
*) cloud - "/ip cloud force-update" command now will work also when
"/ip cloud ddns-enabled = no". usefull if user wants to disable DDNS;
*) RB4xxGL - improved ethernet throughput (less dropped packets);

*) RouterBOARD - fixed health reporting;
*) check-installation: fixed wrong kernel crc on powerpc boards
*) watchdog: fix software watchdog for x86
*) ssh - check conn state before sending disconnect message;
*) ipsec - fixed crash that happened in specific situation;
with
What's new in 6.28rc14 (2015-Mar-17 15:41):

*) tile - rare situation when CCR devices failed to auto-negotiate ethernet link (introduced in v6.25);
*) route - using ldp could cause connected routes with
invalid interface nexthop;
*) added support for SiS 190/191 PCI Ethernet adapter;
*) made metarouter work on boards with 802.11ac support or usb LTE;
*) sstp server - allow ADH only when no certificate set;
*) make fat32 disk formatting support disks bigger than 134GiB;
*) fixed tunnels - could crash when clamp-tcp-mss was enabled;
*) added basic counters for ipv4/bridge fast path, also show status weather fast
path is active at all;
*) console - added 'comment' parameter for '/system script'
*) api - return sentences can have property ~.section~ that groups values
from commands such as ~monitor~, ~traceroute~,
~print~ (with non-zero 'interval' value);
*) cloud - add time zone detection feature ~/system clock time-zone-autodetect~;
*) cloud - rename ~/ip cloud enabled~ to ~/ip cloud ddns-enabled~;
*) cloud - make ~/ip cloud update-time~ independent from ~/ip cloud ddns-enabled~
*) cloud - when setting ~/ip cloud ddns-enabled~ to ~no~ router will send
message to server to disable DNS name for this routerboard;
*) cloud - ~/ip cloud force-update~ command now will work also when
~/ip cloud ddns-enabled = no~. usefull if user wants to disable DDNS;
*) RB4xxGL - improved ethernet throughput (less dropped packets);

*) trafflow: - fixed crash on disable;
*) pppoe - fixed crash when big ppp packets with were sent over EOIP;
*) tilegx - fixed memory leak when queue settings are changed;
*) ar9888 - fixed crash when hw reports invalid rate;
*) console - fixed "in" operator in console;
*) console - make "/system package update print" work again.
PEAR2_Net_RouterOS(1.0.0b6) - My API client in PHP
(Rate my posts? If you want... no pressure...)
 
User avatar
bajodel
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 545
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2013 8:30 am
Location: Italy

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Wed Mar 18, 2015 3:28 pm

On x86 winbox (2/3) log window shows only 1 row (sometimes more ..but unreliable).
 
jarda
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 7604
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:46 pm

v6.28 final RC testing

Wed Mar 18, 2015 5:32 pm

Could you provide a list of ticket numbers you believe that were corrected in this release? We should know if testing worths because you do not provide change lists in full.
 
User avatar
eworm
Member
Member
Posts: 402
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 9:23 am
Location: Oberhausen, Germany
Contact:

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Wed Mar 18, 2015 6:14 pm

Sending e-mail is still broken for me. The issue is described here:
System Error sending email timeout occurred

Any chance to get that fixed?
Manage RouterOS scripts and extend your devices' functionality: RouterOS Scripts
 
ethernet
just joined
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 1:44 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Wed Mar 18, 2015 9:22 pm

Sending e-mail is still broken for me. The issue is described here:
System Error sending email timeout occurred

Any chance to get that fixed?
+1
Still not working
 
Sob
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 4798
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:11 pm

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Wed Mar 18, 2015 10:54 pm

@jarda: As usual, download, install and hope for the best, sometimes you get lucky. I did today. A little. But yeah, some kind of notification would be nice.

"Good news, dear user! We think that we fixed your ticket. Sincerely, your support."
People who quote full posts should be spanked with ethernet cable. Some exceptions for multi-topic threads may apply.
 
jarda
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 7604
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:46 pm

Wed Mar 18, 2015 11:19 pm

This is not the way I work.
 
User avatar
bajodel
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 545
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2013 8:30 am
Location: Italy

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Thu Mar 19, 2015 1:53 pm

Problem in system health on 2011UAS v6.28rc15 (not tested on other boards)

1) From gui menu I see an empty window

2) config export stuck on that with ..
..(cut)..
set time-zone-autodetect=no time-zone-name=Europe/Rome
#error exporting /system health
/system identity
..(cut)..
 
User avatar
bajodel
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 545
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2013 8:30 am
Location: Italy

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Thu Mar 19, 2015 1:58 pm

just checked ..on CRS125-24G-1S v6.28rc15 /system health is ok
 
User avatar
bajodel
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 545
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2013 8:30 am
Location: Italy

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Thu Mar 19, 2015 6:11 pm

Problem in system health on 2011UAS v6.28rc15 (not tested on other boards)

1) From gui menu I see an empty window

2) config export stuck on that with ..
..(cut)..
set time-zone-autodetect=no time-zone-name=Europe/Rome
#error exporting /system health
/system identity
..(cut)..
Rebooting 2 times "solve" the problem.
 
givemesam
newbie
Posts: 49
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:49 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Fri Mar 20, 2015 8:44 am

There are no dates on the posts in this thread.

When will .28 be released?

Just updated to .27 from .23 and immediately adopted an Ethernet negotiating issue on my ccr1036.....

After two hours it just went off line. Has some FCS errors on my Cooper sfp. No asking of reboots or unplugging recovered it until it randomly decided to come up.

Not good.... .23 was very stable but hey, it's good to update right?
 
jcem
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 4:41 pm
Location: Grebbestad, Sweden

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Fri Mar 20, 2015 12:46 pm

Hi!

Error when opening inbox "Couldn't start - profile already running (6)"

When opening inbox with ROS6.28RC15 CRS125 with profile running
from previous session

RGDS
Jörgen
 
fallenwrx
newbie
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 10:59 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Sat Mar 21, 2015 4:10 am

RB951G running 6.28rc15 poor performance with ipad mini 2 running 8.1 web pages fail to load but no issues with windows computers on the same wireless network
 
alexjhart
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 192
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 8:03 pm

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Sat Mar 21, 2015 7:33 am

tile - rare situation when CCR devices failed to auto-negotiate ethernet link (introduced in v6.25);
Can you tell me more about that please?
-----
Alex Hart

The Brothers WISP
 
givemesam
newbie
Posts: 49
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:49 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Sat Mar 21, 2015 7:58 am

me too. i upgraded to 6.27 last night, and 2 hrs later had FCS errors on the uplink/wan port connecting to upstream isp. This resulted in an outage that was devastating. rebooting did not help, reseating did not help. nothing helped. it randomly came back an hour later.......... Very concerned it was this 'rare' issue, but it happened within 2 hours so who knows.

from v23 to v27 did the driver become more sensitive to cabling, have a lower tolerance to cable issues? etc.....

using CCR1026 16GB, uplink was sfp+ mikrotik copper module.

basically been waiting for 6.28 and cancelled a trip to make sure i load it in person 'this week' as posted in the 1st commend.

Normis, can we still expect it this week? you guys push new updates on saturdays?

thanks you
 
givemesam
newbie
Posts: 49
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:49 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:19 pm

Is this the x27 (introduced in .25) port flapping issue? Taken off upstream switch cisco me3600x, ethernet port, connected to mikrotik sfp+ port on ccr1036 16GB via mikrotik copper sfp

Also note: their port is set to no autonegotiation / 1000M Full
My port would not sync up on autonegotiation unchecked when we first installed it with r23, advertising at 10,100,100M Full only. 2 hours after upgrading to x27 we had the logs occur below. We also saw some FCS errors on the microtik log. We changed MT to only advertise at 1000M Full, still no fixed rate port support.

lasted exactly 1 hour, then came back up without much issue...... Is this the bug that is fixed in r28? that was introduced in r25 where r23 was free from this flapping issue?

====
Mar 19 18:06:32.507 MDT: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/3, changed state to down
Mar 19 18:06:33.567 MDT: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/3, changed state to down
Mar 19 18:06:39.707 MDT: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/3, changed state to up
Mar 19 18:06:40.707 MDT: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/3, changed state to up
Mar 19 18:08:30.924 MDT: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/3, changed state to down
Mar 19 18:08:31.980 MDT: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/3, changed state to down
Mar 19 18:23:00.743 MDT: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/3, changed state to up
Mar 19 18:23:01.743 MDT: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/3, changed state to up
Mar 19 18:23:08.063 MDT: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/3, changed state to down
Mar 19 18:23:09.123 MDT: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/3, changed state to down
Mar 19 19:01:52.168 MDT: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/3, changed state to up
Mar 19 19:01:55.112 MDT: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/3, changed state to down
Mar 19 19:06:07.153 MDT: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/3, changed state to up
Mar 19 19:06:08.153 MDT: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/3, changed state to up
===
 
User avatar
SQx
just joined
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:31 pm

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Sat Mar 21, 2015 11:41 pm

On Mikrotik RB751U-2HnD see next, maybe best way is hide this option?:
Image
MCP, CCNA, CCNP
 
User avatar
BartoszP
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1717
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2014 1:13 pm
Location: Poland

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Sun Mar 22, 2015 1:37 am

It is much better than @ 6.22 :-)
Voltage.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Real admins use real keyboards.
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 24268
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Mon Mar 23, 2015 2:04 pm

errors occuring while opening plz help.
what kind of errors :) ?
No answer to your question? How to write posts
 
DjM
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 111
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 2:44 pm

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Mon Mar 23, 2015 3:08 pm

Hello MikroTik support team,

[Ticket#2015032266000169]

It is not possible to add comment for "/ip dhcp-server alert" object via CLI. Adding comment via Winbox is working fine, but comment added via Winbox is also not visible via CLI.

Tested on: ROS 6.27, RB2011, RB951

Update:
Based on information from support team this issue is fixed in 6.28 release.
 
ATROX
newbie
Posts: 44
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 2:10 pm

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Tue Mar 24, 2015 1:24 pm

I have 15 IPsec tunnels.
Sometimes IPsec tunnels is down!
Kill connections, flush installed SAs, reboot - no help!!!
Please fix IPsec!
Image
Developers big request - fix IPsec errors...
 
User avatar
ziegenberg
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 11:14 am
Location: Vienna
Contact:

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Tue Mar 24, 2015 4:34 pm

I'm missing the Capsman2 v6.28 package. Where can I download it?
 
User avatar
honzam
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2292
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:27 pm
Location: Czech Republic

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Tue Mar 24, 2015 6:52 pm

I'm missing the Capsman2 v6.28 package. Where can I download it?
http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ ... mipsbe.npk
LAN, FTTx, Wireless. ISP operator
 
albersag
just joined
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 10:29 pm

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Tue Mar 24, 2015 8:20 pm

Hi.

and multicast for 6.28rc16?
 
coolspot
just joined
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:31 pm

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Wed Mar 25, 2015 12:06 am

What about the latest PayPal handshake failure issue present in the current release? It occurred today and surely is present in the version you are now promoting. Get it together MT, this payment solution needs sorting, integration of custom merchants or ipn protocols to better paypal control.
 
ALEJANDROgordon
just joined
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 12:53 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Thu Mar 26, 2015 3:50 pm

hi i need help, one port on my ccr router, it gives me an error fcs, which makes it not work and still disconnected still been running.
Image

Image
in this pictures the port is disconnected, but the state is still running.
the actual version is 6.28rc17, firmware 3.22.
I'm try to force, put the link spee to 100 mbps, but in the port 1gps is set ¿why?
 
wispwest
Member
Member
Posts: 477
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 3:48 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Thu Mar 26, 2015 11:49 pm

We have a bunch of NetMetal radios in place as a "backup link" for our AirFiber24 which drops out during rain. We had the first heavy rain since I upgraded the backup links to Mikrotik AC, and it performed horrible. I thought maybe upgrading to 6.27 would help, but nope. I thought that 866/866 data rates would pickup backhaul traffic that pushes 250-300mb through AirFiber.

What's interesting, is when the link FIRST establishes connection after reboot or forced disable/renable of WLAN, the traffic spiked up to almost 250-300mb, then after a few seconds, maybe a minute, dropped to 80-90mb. It's obvious this is just something Mikrotik needs to tweak on.

Another implementation that should be addressed, you can ONLY chose 20/40/or 80mhz channel. I've seen with UBNT products on PtP, that 50 & 60mhz channel widths work MUCH better than 80mhz, especially if there's any noise. Really would be nice to be able to use 30/50/60 channel widths.

There are some SERIOUS issues with 802.11ac still, and I really wish Mikrotik would address these.

Data Rates: 866/866 (maxed out) but drop almost in 1/2 with NV2
NV2 throughput: 80-90mb
Nstreme throughput: 180-200mb
802.11 throughput: 120-150mb
 
User avatar
NathanA
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 801
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 9:01 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Fri Mar 27, 2015 10:17 am

basically been waiting for 6.28 and cancelled a trip to make sure i load it in person 'this week' as posted in the 1st commend.

Normis, can we still expect it this week? you guys push new updates on saturdays?
What's the rush? If 6.27 causes you problems, downgrade back to 6.23. Don't cancel trips based on when they might release it...just wait until you are back and then schedule a proper maintenance window to do the rollout with.

I for one applaud MikroTik for not rushing this release, and only releasing it "when it's ready."

-- Nathan
 
mars
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 228
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 1:43 pm

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Fri Mar 27, 2015 2:09 pm

We have a bunch of NetMetal radios in place as a "backup link" for our AirFiber24 which drops out during rain. We had the first heavy rain since I upgraded the backup links to Mikrotik AC, and it performed horrible. I thought maybe upgrading to 6.27 would help, but nope. I thought that 866/866 data rates would pickup backhaul traffic that pushes 250-300mb through AirFiber.

What's interesting, is when the link FIRST establishes connection after reboot or forced disable/renable of WLAN, the traffic spiked up to almost 250-300mb, then after a few seconds, maybe a minute, dropped to 80-90mb. It's obvious this is just something Mikrotik needs to tweak on.

Another implementation that should be addressed, you can ONLY chose 20/40/or 80mhz channel. I've seen with UBNT products on PtP, that 50 & 60mhz channel widths work MUCH better than 80mhz, especially if there's any noise. Really would be nice to be able to use 30/50/60 channel widths.

There are some SERIOUS issues with 802.11ac still, and I really wish Mikrotik would address these.

Data Rates: 866/866 (maxed out) but drop almost in 1/2 with NV2
NV2 throughput: 80-90mb
Nstreme throughput: 180-200mb
802.11 throughput: 120-150mb

+1000.....
 
plentyofbug
just joined
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 1:22 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Sat Mar 28, 2015 11:23 pm

We have a bunch of NetMetal radios in place as a "backup link" for our AirFiber24 which drops out during rain. We had the first heavy rain since I upgraded the backup links to Mikrotik AC, and it performed horrible. I thought maybe upgrading to 6.27 would help, but nope. I thought that 866/866 data rates would pickup backhaul traffic that pushes 250-300mb through AirFiber.

What's interesting, is when the link FIRST establishes connection after reboot or forced disable/renable of WLAN, the traffic spiked up to almost 250-300mb, then after a few seconds, maybe a minute, dropped to 80-90mb. It's obvious this is just something Mikrotik needs to tweak on.

Another implementation that should be addressed, you can ONLY chose 20/40/or 80mhz channel. I've seen with UBNT products on PtP, that 50 & 60mhz channel widths work MUCH better than 80mhz, especially if there's any noise. Really would be nice to be able to use 30/50/60 channel widths.

There are some SERIOUS issues with 802.11ac still, and I really wish Mikrotik would address these.

Data Rates: 866/866 (maxed out) but drop almost in 1/2 with NV2
NV2 throughput: 80-90mb
Nstreme throughput: 180-200mb
802.11 throughput: 120-150mb

+1000.....
+10000
 
User avatar
dimi
just joined
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:32 am
Location: Ukraine

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Sun Mar 29, 2015 2:30 am

We have a bunch of NetMetal radios in place as a "backup link" for our AirFiber24 which drops out during rain. We had the first heavy rain since I upgraded the backup links to Mikrotik AC, and it performed horrible. I thought maybe upgrading to 6.27 would help, but nope. I thought that 866/866 data rates would pickup backhaul traffic that pushes 250-300mb through AirFiber.

What's interesting, is when the link FIRST establishes connection after reboot or forced disable/renable of WLAN, the traffic spiked up to almost 250-300mb, then after a few seconds, maybe a minute, dropped to 80-90mb. It's obvious this is just something Mikrotik needs to tweak on.

Another implementation that should be addressed, you can ONLY chose 20/40/or 80mhz channel. I've seen with UBNT products on PtP, that 50 & 60mhz channel widths work MUCH better than 80mhz, especially if there's any noise. Really would be nice to be able to use 30/50/60 channel widths.

There are some SERIOUS issues with 802.11ac still, and I really wish Mikrotik would address these.

Data Rates: 866/866 (maxed out) but drop almost in 1/2 with NV2
NV2 throughput: 80-90mb
Nstreme throughput: 180-200mb
802.11 throughput: 120-150mb

+1000.....
+10000
+100000
 
madmax
just joined
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 2:20 pm

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Mon Mar 30, 2015 3:08 pm

+10000[/quote]

+100000[/quote]

+1000000
 
rodolfo
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 543
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 11:50 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Mon Mar 30, 2015 4:44 pm

pppoe - fixed crash when big ppp packets with were sent over EOIP;

Could explain the symptoms of this issue?
rodolfo
IZ0UQV
 
User avatar
strods
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 1409
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:22 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Mon Mar 30, 2015 5:27 pm

pppoe - fixed crash when big ppp packets with were sent over EOIP;

Could explain the symptoms of this issue?
Your router could either have a high memory usage or reboot itself.
 
TomosRider
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 202
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 1:51 pm

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Mon Mar 30, 2015 5:31 pm

No info on release date of .28?
 
jondavy
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 11:14 pm
Location: Brasil

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Mon Mar 30, 2015 10:08 pm

Do not forget the BGP optimization, not leave it to last
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=94241

here in Brazil when it comes to BGP multipeer everyone is going to other solutions because everyone is getting scared
 
_saik0
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 127
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 11:18 pm

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Tue Mar 31, 2015 11:05 pm

pppoe - fixed crash when big ppp packets with were sent over EOIP;

Could explain the symptoms of this issue?
Your router could either have a high memory usage or reboot itself.
Hmmm... just upgraded from 5.14 to 6.27 and had two sudden reboots in the last 3 days.
I do have a pppoe client session towards my ISP, but no EoIP.
Rather concerned... 5.14 was rock solid with uptimes only being disrupted by power loss. :/
 
warn1ng
just joined
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 3:12 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Wed Apr 01, 2015 2:43 pm

Using v6.28rc18 i found this diff between what i see on "Interfaces" and what i see on "Torch".

ScreenShot : https://www.dropbox.com/s/sj5c6252bz1yy ... 2.png?dl=0
 
User avatar
eworm
Member
Member
Posts: 402
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 9:23 am
Location: Oberhausen, Germany
Contact:

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Thu Apr 02, 2015 3:36 pm

Sending e-mail is still broken for me. The issue is described here:
System Error sending email timeout occurred

Any chance to get that fixed?
This is fixed in version 6.28rc20. Thanks a lot MikroTik!
Manage RouterOS scripts and extend your devices' functionality: RouterOS Scripts
 
athlonxp78
just joined
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 4:17 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Thu Apr 02, 2015 4:43 pm

I´m downloading the changelog, but since RC16 everytime is the same outdated "routeros_devnote.txt"... someone have the latest changes? Thanks guys
 
pbr3000
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 74
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:31 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Thu Apr 02, 2015 6:35 pm

I´m downloading the changelog, but since RC16 everytime is the same outdated "routeros_devnote.txt"... someone have the latest changes? Thanks guys
Good point. I would to know the changes before testing new versions. Mikrotik team?
 
uldis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 3425
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 2:55 pm

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Thu Apr 02, 2015 7:24 pm

The changelog is updated to the v6.28rc20
The version is going into the final testing phase - we hope to make a full v6.28 release next week. Please report to support@mikrotik.com if you see any problem in the latest RC version.
 
ALEJANDROgordon
just joined
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 12:53 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:33 pm

hi i need help, one port on my ccr router, it gives me an error fcs, which makes it not work and still disconnected still been running.
Image

Image
in this pictures the port is disconnected, but the state is still running.
the actual version is 6.28rc17, firmware 3.22.
I'm try to force, put the link spee to 100 mbps, but in the port 1gps is set ¿why?
 
MECHEGUREN
just joined
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 4:30 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Fri Apr 03, 2015 5:37 am

Normis... you can fix the https://www.google.com error in hot spot ???????????????
 
mars
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 228
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 1:43 pm

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Fri Apr 03, 2015 7:28 am

The changelog is updated to the v6.28rc20
The version is going into the final testing phase - we hope to make a full v6.28 release next week. Please report to support@mikrotik.com if you see any problem in the latest RC version.

will there be improvements for ac
 
Juta
just joined
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 12:04 pm

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Fri Apr 03, 2015 9:57 am

What about SMTP HELO problem discussed in http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=93902 ?
 
akschu
newbie
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:09 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Sat Apr 04, 2015 12:21 am

Fixing the fetch ssl bug would be fantastic since it makes /tool fetch unusable for me:

http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=95576
 
User avatar
Masyanich
newbie
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 8:19 am
Location: Russian province
Contact:

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:39 am

IGMP snooping PLZ!
 
poizzon
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 113
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:53 pm

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Tue Apr 07, 2015 10:48 am

sometimes winbox disconnecting, in log getting errors :

10:40:23 script,error script error: action timed out - try again, if error continues contact MikroTik support and send a supout file (13)
10:44:01 script,error script error: action timed out - try again, if error continues contact MikroTik support and send a supout file (13)
--
poi
 
User avatar
rextended
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2946
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:49 pm
Location: Capalbio, Tuscany, Italy

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Tue Apr 07, 2015 2:57 pm

Please put a disclaimer inside 6.27/6.28:

"ac" models wlan work only with "wireless-fp" package enabled.
using "wireless" package on ac models cause wlan to not be recognized from the system.

RB922UAGS-5HPacD S.N.:5F820473960B
I'm Italian, not English. Sorry for my imperfect grammar.
 
jondavy
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 11:14 pm
Location: Brasil

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Tue Apr 07, 2015 3:36 pm

the key event DEL (delete) stopped working, not delete any item when selected in any table within winbox
 
DrDeft
just joined
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 2:16 pm

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Wed Apr 08, 2015 9:14 am

RB1100AHx2 v6.27

http://puu.sh/h5LXn/32a96e0e88.png

There is no cable connected to ether10, but log tells that link on ether10 is up/down often.

MAC adresses on ether10 and LANs_bridge are the same - 00:D4:FF:6D:53:10

No problems are detected, but I can't understand why is it happening with port10 on RB1100AHx2 in log
 
rpingar
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 541
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 2:46 pm
Location: Italy

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:33 am

we get kernle panic on rc20 (and previous) on a p-mp wireless ap using NV2+WDS when there one or more clients that get frquent disconnection.

We opened the ticket Ticket#2015040866000167 where there is the supout attached.

regards
Ros
 
santa
newbie
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 10:53 pm
Location: POLAND, Gdansk

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Wed Apr 08, 2015 11:18 am

Switches mikrotik without igms snooping and DHCP snooping is cheap toys ! Why these toys you produce?
+1
 
DrDeft
just joined
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 2:16 pm

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Wed Apr 08, 2015 11:39 am

Switches mikrotik without igms snooping and DHCP snooping is cheap toys ! Why these toys you produce?
+1
 
User avatar
bclewl1ns
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 60
Joined: Sat Jul 06, 2013 7:38 am
Contact:

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Wed Apr 08, 2015 11:57 pm

We are still seeing a big problem with Tcp traffic. When NV2 With 6.28RC20 and previous

When using NV2 if any link the the chain is not negotiated at GigE full our upload TCP traffic is 10 Meg. This happens on AC and on N devices. This has created a huge problem with customer traffic.

We tested in the following way.

PTP Testing

PTP A End ---> PTP B End. Bend at 100 Meg A end at Gige 10 Meg up 12 meg down
With both ends and GigE full speed

PTMP AP ->>> CPE . CPE at 100 Meg AP at GigE. 10 meg up 10 Meg down.

If we move to NStream No problem except disconnect. (Disconnects are bad)
Brett

What is understood need not be discussed.
 
sasbibic
just joined
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:12 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Thu Apr 09, 2015 10:14 am

SSTP tunnel fails to connect:

Clinet V6.25 -> Server V6.28rc20 - fails
CLient V6.28rc20 -> Server V6.25 - fails

Client V6.25 -> Server V6.25 - works OK.
Client V6.28rc20 -> Server V6.28rc20 - no test.

I use SSTP connections from clients for management access, so You can imagine where the problem is ?

/Sas
 
santa
newbie
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 10:53 pm
Location: POLAND, Gdansk

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Thu Apr 09, 2015 10:22 am

Why are you testing different using versions of ROS? Just check if "V6.28rc20 -> Server V6.28rc20" is OK.
 
sasbibic
just joined
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:12 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Thu Apr 09, 2015 10:25 am

Why are you testing different using versions of ROS? Just check if "V6.28rc20 -> Server V6.28rc20" is OK.

How can I upgrade geographicali dispersed routers at once ? If there will be no other solution I'll be forced to do that, but breaking compatiblity betwen versions is very BAD.
 
santa
newbie
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 10:53 pm
Location: POLAND, Gdansk

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Thu Apr 09, 2015 10:28 am

Yes, I agree that this is BAD, unfortunately this is not the first time :). But I know what answer will give you the Support team. Upgrade both ends and then make a test.
 
sasbibic
just joined
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:12 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Thu Apr 09, 2015 10:42 am

Yes, I agree that this is BAD, unfortunately this is not the first time :). But I know what answer will give you the Support team. Upgrade both ends and then make a test.
I'll solve this, but when someone like me relays on management over sstp link and begins upgrade on false end .....

/Sas
 
computercolin
just joined
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 11:57 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Fri Apr 10, 2015 10:12 am

CRS125 ingress-port-policer is not working in v6.28rc20. Cannot do more than 1-5Mbps when set.
/interface ethernet switch ingress-port-policer add burst=100k port=ether24-slave-local rate=60M
iperf does 1-5Mbps. Not 60M, 1-5M.
If I delete ingress-port-policer, goes back to normal and iperf does 900Mbps.
 
User avatar
paoloaga
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 222
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:52 am
Location: Vaprio d'Agogna (NO) - Italy
Contact:

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Fri Apr 10, 2015 12:49 pm

CRS125 ingress-port-policer is not working in v6.28rc20. Cannot do more than 1-5Mbps when set.
/interface ethernet switch ingress-port-policer add burst=100k port=ether24-slave-local rate=60M
iperf does 1-5Mbps. Not 60M, 1-5M.
If I delete ingress-port-policer, goes back to normal and iperf does 900Mbps.
This happens to me with 6.24, 6.25 and 6.27 also (not tested on other versions).
 
User avatar
docmarius
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1219
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: Timisoara, Romania
Contact:

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Fri Apr 10, 2015 1:04 pm

Shouldn't that burst value be higher? The moment it goes in burst mode, it will send at 100k, than back to 60M, again burst mode at 100k and so on. Maybe burst = 100M?
Torturing CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+, RB450G, RB750GL, RB951G-2HnD, RB960PGS, RB260GSP, OmniTIK 5HnD and NetMetal 922UAGS-5HPacD + R11e-5HnD in my home network.
 
User avatar
NathanA
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 801
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 9:01 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Fri Apr 10, 2015 3:00 pm

Why are you testing different using versions of ROS? Just check if "V6.28rc20 -> Server V6.28rc20" is OK.
How can I upgrade geographicali dispersed routers at once ? If there will be no other solution I'll be forced to do that, but breaking compatiblity betwen versions is very BAD.
Who said anything about upgrading actual in-production SSTP servers? Pull a router out of stock and configure it as a temporary/test SSTP server. If you have no spare RouterBoards sitting around, fire up a copy of x86 RouterOS on a spare PC, or heck, even as a VM inside of VMware or something. There are TONS of options open to you that wouldn't require you to install a beta version of the OS on production routers!

-- Nathan
 
sasbibic
just joined
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:12 am

Fri Apr 10, 2015 5:31 pm

I've figured out this by using test equipment, but at some point I'll eventually do an upgrade. I was actuality posting test resoults hopeing to spare someone's problems if upgrading at false end.

/Sas
 
akschu
newbie
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:09 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Fri Apr 10, 2015 8:02 pm

Fixing the fetch ssl bug would be fantastic since it makes /tool fetch unusable for me:

http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=95576
Got this back from support:
Re: [Ticket#2015040666000483] Bug with /tool fetch and https.
Hello,

Its due to bug in ssl library. Next release will have the fix.

Regards,
Maris B.
Hopefully we will see this in the RC? Normis, can you confirm?

schu
 
computercolin
just joined
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 11:57 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Sat Apr 11, 2015 1:35 am

Shouldn't that burst value be higher? The moment it goes in burst mode, it will send at 100k, than back to 60M, again burst mode at 100k and so on. Maybe burst = 100M?
I do not know how burst is working.

What I see suggests 1) CRS interval between rate-limit-check or 2) CRS method of drop packets is not good.

TCP congestion control will adjust and send at maximum limit allowed. All CRS needs to do is 1) monitor ingress rate and 2) drop packets in granular way (RED?).

Instead, it appears CRS opens flood gate wide, closes flood gate completely, opens flood gate again, closes, etc.
This breaks TCP congestion control =o

Also, what I really want to do is ingress-port-policer at 550Mbps and I cannot set burst this high:
Image
 
jthorpe
just joined
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 3:17 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Sat Apr 11, 2015 4:39 am

Does anyone know if SSTP will be fixed in 6.28?

I have two CRS125s running 6.27 as SSTP servers and a RB951Ui-2HnD as a client.

The first time I set this up, SSTP worked perfectly, but since rebooting the client, I can almost never get the SSTP to work again. The SSTP connection comes up, but the associated interfaces on the client never enter a "Running" state.

For instance:

----
/interface sstp-client> print
Flags: X - disabled, R - running
0 ;;; SSTP via Internode
name="sstp-out1" max-mtu=1500 max-mru=1500 mrru=disabled connect-to=server1:4430 http-proxy=0.0.0.0:443 certificate=client1 verify-server-certificate=yes
verify-server-address-from-certificate=no user="user" password="password" profile=default keepalive-timeout=60 add-default-route=no dial-on-demand=no authentication=mschap2 pfs=yes

1 ;;; SSTP via Telstra
name="sstp-out2" max-mtu=1500 max-mru=1500 mrru=disabled connect-to=server2:4430 http-proxy=0.0.0.0:443 certificate=client1 verify-server-certificate=yes
verify-server-address-from-certificate=no user="user" password="password" profile=default keepalive-timeout=60 add-default-route=no dial-on-demand=no authentication=mschap2 pfs=yes
----

SSTP sessions are ok:

----
/interface sstp-client> monitor 0
status: connected
uptime: 8m56s
encoding: AES256-CBC
mtu: 1500
local-address: 192.168.255.18
remote-address: 192.168.255.17

/interface sstp-client> monitor 1
status: connected
uptime: 10m47s
encoding: AES256-CBC
mtu: 1500
local-address: 192.168.255.22
remote-address: 192.168.255.21
----

I have tried combinations of pfs=yes and no (making sure they match on the server end as well) to no avail.

I've opened ticket 2015041166000026 with MikroTik regarding the issue.

Is anyone aware of a workaround or if this will be fixed in 6.28?
 
User avatar
avenn
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 79
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 11:59 pm
Location: Burnley UK
Contact:

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Sat Apr 11, 2015 1:38 pm

Hello,

I`ve been following Mikrotik ROS updates for a long time and this one seems to have stalled / slowed down?

Usually when around RC20 released soon.

I hope this means far more testing and taking of time at Mikrotik?

Regards

Aidan
MTCRE - MTCNA - MTCTCE
 
poizzon
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 113
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:53 pm

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Sat Apr 11, 2015 5:20 pm

[admin@MikroTik] > system resource print
uptime: 8m13s
version: 6.28rc18
build-time: Mar/30/2015 15:41:08
free-memory: 40.7MiB
total-memory: 64.0MiB
cpu: MIPS 24Kc V7.4
cpu-count: 1
cpu-frequency: 400MHz
cpu-load: 4%
free-hdd-space: 6.6MiB
total-hdd-space: 16.0MiB
write-sect-since-reboot: 953
write-sect-total: 17952
bad-blocks: 0%
architecture-name: mipsbe
board-name: mAP
platform: MikroTik
[admin@MikroTik] > sys health print

action timed out - try again, if error continues contact MikroTik support and send a supout file (13)
[admin@MikroTik] >
--
poi
 
avantwireless
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 3:04 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing TORCH broken!!!

Sat Apr 11, 2015 6:40 pm

Well in the final rc candidate Torch is again broken showing wildly less traffic than is really on the link, to the point that torch is unuseable...



Sending e-mail is still broken for me. The issue is described here:
System Error sending email timeout occurred

Any chance to get that fixed?
This is fixed in version 6.28rc20. Thanks a lot MikroTik!
 
User avatar
IPANetEngineer
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 1053
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:46 am
Location: Jackson, MS, USA
Contact:

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Sun Apr 12, 2015 5:58 pm

@MikroTik

Can you give us any timeframe on when 6.28 will be released?
Global - MikroTik Support & Consulting - English | Francais | Español | Portuguese +1 855-645-7684
https://iparchitechs.com/services/mikro ... l-support/ mikrotiksupport@iparchitechs.com
 
Clauu
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 205
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:27 pm
Location: RO

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Sun Apr 12, 2015 7:38 pm

Let them properly check for problems tickets and so on, better 1major update instead of giving us 2 buggy updates in a month
Btw Happy Easter to all! :)
Having fun with RB850Gx2, RB2011UiAS-2HnD, RB260GSP, RB751U-2HnD, CRS112, RB3011UiAS, hAP ac, cAP ac and hAP ac². More others on the way :-)
 
User avatar
avenn
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 79
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 11:59 pm
Location: Burnley UK
Contact:

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Mon Apr 13, 2015 11:52 am

Clauu

+1000
MTCRE - MTCNA - MTCTCE
 
jdog
newbie
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2015 3:40 pm

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Mon Apr 13, 2015 3:52 pm

I agree. I would rather time spent and get a quality release, instead of rushing and releasing garbage.

That said, I would like some more communication as to how the fixes are proceeding.

IE - We now have SSTP fixed, working on BGP this week, and we want to make sure OSPF is good before we release this one.
(Just an example)
 
User avatar
IPANetEngineer
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 1053
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:46 am
Location: Jackson, MS, USA
Contact:

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:07 pm

I agree. I would rather time spent and get a quality release, instead of rushing and releasing garbage.

That said, I would like some more communication as to how the fixes are proceeding.

IE - We now have SSTP fixed, working on BGP this week, and we want to make sure OSPF is good before we release this one.
(Just an example)
It would definitely be helpful to have some kind of release timeline. I certainly don't want the releases rushed or buggy, but it's very beneficial to know roughly when the new code will come out for testing and maintenance window planning.
Global - MikroTik Support & Consulting - English | Francais | Español | Portuguese +1 855-645-7684
https://iparchitechs.com/services/mikro ... l-support/ mikrotiksupport@iparchitechs.com
 
User avatar
bclewl1ns
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 60
Joined: Sat Jul 06, 2013 7:38 am
Contact:

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:21 am

I agree. I would rather time spent and get a quality release, instead of rushing and releasing garbage.

That said, I would like some more communication as to how the fixes are proceeding.

IE - We now have SSTP fixed, working on BGP this week, and we want to make sure OSPF is good before we release this one.
(Just an example)
It would definitely be helpful to have some kind of release timeline. I certainly don't want the releases rushed or buggy, but it's very beneficial to know roughly when the new code will come out for testing and maintenance window planning.
+1
Brett

What is understood need not be discussed.
 
avantwireless
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 3:04 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing One for the books... Ce vs eC

Tue Apr 14, 2015 8:24 am

So I have two devices that I just upgraded to 6.28 because of superior ethernet performance... One is an RB911G-HPnD the other is a RB912UAG-HPnD. They are about 1.4 miles apart with signals in the low 50/high 40's. I noticed that they were see a 20 mhz channel negotiation with channel set to 20/40 eC Figured there was interference so I tried Ce. Still couldn't get better than 144mb negotiation... On a whim, I changed one side to eC and left the other at Ce... Now running at 300/400mb/s and a 40mhz channel. What is up with that?
 
User avatar
bclewl1ns
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 60
Joined: Sat Jul 06, 2013 7:38 am
Contact:

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Tue Apr 14, 2015 10:02 am

So i was going to upgrade my CCR's to v 6.28rc20 However i noticed that the rc20 is no longer on the filename. Does this mean 6.28 is final and launched??
Brett

What is understood need not be discussed.
 
TomosRider
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 202
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 1:51 pm

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Tue Apr 14, 2015 10:05 am

Who said anything about upgrading actual in-production SSTP servers? Pull a router out of stock and configure it as a temporary/test SSTP server. If you have no spare RouterBoards sitting around, fire up a copy of x86 RouterOS on a spare PC, or heck, even as a VM inside of VMware or something. There are TONS of options open to you that wouldn't require you to install a beta version of the OS on production routers!

-- Nathan
Well said Nathan. I have similar thoughts on tons of complaints here. Use stable versions that work for you, test the hell out of newer versions of ROS on some backup or spare router...simple as that.
 
User avatar
bclewl1ns
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 60
Joined: Sat Jul 06, 2013 7:38 am
Contact:

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Tue Apr 14, 2015 10:07 am

Who said anything about upgrading actual in-production SSTP servers? Pull a router out of stock and configure it as a temporary/test SSTP server. If you have no spare RouterBoards sitting around, fire up a copy of x86 RouterOS on a spare PC, or heck, even as a VM inside of VMware or something. There are TONS of options open to you that wouldn't require you to install a beta version of the OS on production routers!

-- Nathan
Well said Nathan. I have similar thoughts on tons of complaints here. Use stable versions that work for you, test the hell out of newer versions of ROS on some backup or spare router...simple as that.
+1
Brett

What is understood need not be discussed.
 
uldis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 3425
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 2:55 pm

Re: v6.28 final RC testing One for the books... Ce vs eC

Tue Apr 14, 2015 2:59 pm

So I have two devices that I just upgraded to 6.28 because of superior ethernet performance... One is an RB911G-HPnD the other is a RB912UAG-HPnD. They are about 1.4 miles apart with signals in the low 50/high 40's. I noticed that they were see a 20 mhz channel negotiation with channel set to 20/40 eC Figured there was interference so I tried Ce. Still couldn't get better than 144mb negotiation... On a whim, I changed one side to eC and left the other at Ce... Now running at 300/400mb/s and a 40mhz channel. What is up with that?
Could you please tell us what center frequencies you were using on both ends? Could you provide support output files to support@mikrotik.com?
 
avantwireless
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 3:04 am

Re: v6.28 final RC testing One for the books... Ce vs eC

Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:35 pm

My bad, I didn't understand that the client follows the AP regardless of client settings on Ce or eC...


On it's way in a few minutes...

Ticket#2015041466000208
So I have two devices that I just upgraded to 6.28 because of superior ethernet performance... One is an RB911G-HPnD the other is a RB912UAG-HPnD. They are about 1.4 miles apart with signals in the low 50/high 40's. I noticed that they were see a 20 mhz channel negotiation with channel set to 20/40 eC Figured there was interference so I tried Ce. Still couldn't get better than 144mb negotiation... On a whim, I changed one side to eC and left the other at Ce... Now running at 300/400mb/s and a 40mhz channel. What is up with that?
Could you please tell us what center frequencies you were using on both ends? Could you provide support output files to support@mikrotik.com?
Last edited by avantwireless on Tue Apr 14, 2015 6:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
Bergante
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:27 pm
Location: Bilbao, Spain

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Tue Apr 14, 2015 5:49 pm

Updated a rb2011.

[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface> set 5 l2mtu=1600 mtu=1540
action timed out - try again, if error continues contact MikroTik support and send a supout file (13)
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface>
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface>
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface>
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface>
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface> print


(And after the print it seems to be hanging).

I had to change the MTU manually because it lost the original MTU after the update.


And the router has crashed. I can no longer access it.

Latest version grabbed 5 minutes ago.
 
User avatar
Bergante
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:27 pm
Location: Bilbao, Spain

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Tue Apr 14, 2015 5:57 pm

Interesting. Lost IP access to it, but it responds to ARP. So not completely crashed.

I'll try to revive it when I can get physical access.
 
uldis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 3425
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 2:55 pm

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Tue Apr 14, 2015 6:05 pm

Updated a rb2011.

[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface> set 5 l2mtu=1600 mtu=1540
action timed out - try again, if error continues contact MikroTik support and send a supout file (13)
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface>
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface>
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface>
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface>
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface> print


(And after the print it seems to be hanging).

I had to change the MTU manually because it lost the original MTU after the update.


And the router has crashed. I can no longer access it.

Latest version grabbed 5 minutes ago.
We just tried the same command and it didn't crash the board. From what RouterOS version you made the upgrade?
What device is connected to that port?
Were you connected to that port you modified?
Are you able to connect to the board via MAC-Winbox connection or Console?
 
User avatar
Bergante
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:27 pm
Location: Bilbao, Spain

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Tue Apr 14, 2015 6:29 pm

Update made from 6.27.

The port connects to an OmniTIK running 6.27. I am using MPLS, OSPF and BGP-VPLS. Some time ago I suffered a similar problems, somehow my MTUs got crazy.

Yes, I have been able to do a mac telnet.

A reboot made ospf come back temporarily but something went wrong again. I have problems to print an interface list or even to do an export

[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface> print
Flags: D - dynamic, X - disabled, R - running, S - slave
# NAME TYPE ACTUAL-MTU L2MTU
0 S ether1 ether 1500 1598
1 S ether2 ether 1500 1598
2 ether3 ether 1500 1598
3 ether4 ether 1500 1598
4 S ether5 ether 1500 1598
5 R ether6 ether 1540 1600
6 ether7 ether 1500 1598
7 ether8 ether 1500 1598
8 ether9 ether 1500 1598
9 ether10 ether 1500 1598
10 sfp1 ether 1500 1598
11 S wlan1 wlan 1500 1600
12 R bridge-ektel bridge 1500 1598
13 R bridge-ektin bridge 1500 1598
14 R bridge1 bridge 1500 1598
15 R guest bridge 1500 65535
16 R loopback bridge 1500 65535
17 D vpls5 vpls
18 D vpls6 vpls
19 D vpls7 vpls
20 D vpls8 vpls
21 D vpls9 vpls
22 D vpls10 vpls
23 D vpls11 vpls
24 D vpls12 vpls

[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface>
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface>
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface>
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface>
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface>
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface>
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface>
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface>
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface> set 15 mtu=1500
interrupted
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface>
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface>
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface>
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface> vpls
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface vpls> bgp-vpls
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface vpls bgp-vpls> print
Flags: X - disabled, I - inactive
# NAME ROUTE-DISTINGUISHER SITE-ID BRIDGE
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface vpls bgp-vpls>
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface vpls bgp-vpls>
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface vpls bgp-vpls> print
Flags: X - disabled, I - inactive
# NAME ROUTE-DISTINGUISHER SITE-ID BRIDGE
[admin@rb2011-despa] /interface vpls bgp-vpls> export
# apr/14/2015 17:24:45 by RouterOS 6.28
# software id = PCAE-WQ4F
#
 
User avatar
Bergante
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:27 pm
Location: Bilbao, Spain

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Tue Apr 14, 2015 6:31 pm

(Sorry I wasn't more explicit, notice the 65535 MTU for the "guest" and "local" bridges which are obviously wrong)
 
User avatar
Bergante
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:27 pm
Location: Bilbao, Spain

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Tue Apr 14, 2015 6:55 pm

Whatever, the configuration was somewhat corrupted when doing the update. I think it happened some time ago with another version and I had to rebuild. Alas, as it was something I was doing while paying attention to something else, I didn't end up reporting it. My fault.

I will try to rebuild and pay proper attention when updating the next one.
 
User avatar
Bergante
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:27 pm
Location: Bilbao, Spain

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Wed Apr 15, 2015 9:09 am

I managed to go back to 6.27 and it begun working with the same configuration.

The symptom: Unless I stopped OSPF propagating routes (which wouldn't allow BGP, hence BGP-VPLS to work) the router experienced some kind of freeze that made many commmands failt such as a "print" froze.

I have a couple of supout files, I presume you'd like to have a look at them.
 
User avatar
sergejs
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 6616
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 3:33 pm
Location: Riga, Latvia
Contact:

Re: v6.28 final RC testing

Wed Apr 15, 2015 10:34 am

<b>Bergante</b>, please contact MikroTik support with attached support output files, when you have issues with 6.28 version.


Thank you very much for the help.
Please post your replies about 6.28 here.

http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=95883

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests