Community discussions

 
magnavox
Member
Member
Topic Author
Posts: 339
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:03 pm

CCR-1036 and SFP+ 10G perfomances

Thu Feb 08, 2018 6:37 pm

Hello to all.

I m testing in LAB a link between two CCR1036-8G-2S+ and SFP+ 10G (Mikrotik S+85DLC03DI)

BTEST not more 1GB in TCP and 2.5GB in UDP.

- ROS 6.41.1 (latest version)
- SFP+ autonegotation disabled and fixed to 10G

Where are wrong?

Best regards.
Best Regards...
 
User avatar
Steveocee
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1110
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2015 10:09 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: CCR-1036 and SFP+ 10G perfomances

Thu Feb 08, 2018 7:38 pm

You should not use the Mikrotik tool. It is inefficient and does not use multi cores.

Connect a machine either side and do a “real” throughout test.
Steve "Steveocee" Carter
PC Gamer, Airsofter, MikroTik Nerd
My Website - My MikroTik Tutorials
 
magnavox
Member
Member
Topic Author
Posts: 339
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:03 pm

Re: CCR-1036 and SFP+ 10G perfomances

Thu Feb 08, 2018 10:58 pm

You should not use the Mikrotik tool. It is inefficient and does not use multi cores.

Connect a machine either side and do a “real” throughout test.
I agree with you, the BTEST can be inefficient, but I also tried whit 3 CCR linked via 10G SPF+... CCR_01<>CCR_02<>CCR_03 same results.
Can you suggest some >1GB testing machine?

LINUX box + Iperf?

Tnx
Best Regards...
 
User avatar
townet
just joined
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2017 11:40 pm
Contact:

Re: CCR-1036 and SFP+ 10G perfomances

Wed Oct 03, 2018 9:52 am

Hello,
why have you S+85DLC03DI SFP+ modules ?
The correct PN is S+85DLC03D, whitout "I".
"I" version have less distance capacity and other shortcomings.

Regards
http://twidunode.com the best UPS PoE injector, solar, battery, 24/48, gigabit, canBUS, 1Wire. All together !!
Image
 
magnavox
Member
Member
Topic Author
Posts: 339
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:03 pm

Re: CCR-1036 and SFP+ 10G perfomances

Wed Oct 03, 2018 2:58 pm

Hello,
why have you S+85DLC03DI SFP+ modules ?
The correct PN is S+85DLC03D, whitout "I".
"I" version have less distance capacity and other shortcomings.

Regards
TNX!
Best Regards...
 
Guntis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 1:40 pm

Re: CCR-1036 and SFP+ 10G perfomances

Wed Oct 03, 2018 4:26 pm

You should not use the Mikrotik tool. It is inefficient and does not use multi cores.

Connect a machine either side and do a “real” throughout test.
I agree with you, the BTEST can be inefficient, but I also tried whit 3 CCR linked via 10G SPF+... CCR_01<>CCR_02<>CCR_03 same results.
Can you suggest some >1GB testing machine?

LINUX box + Iperf?

Tnx
Iperf would work, another option is to use Traffic Generator.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests