Community discussions

MUM Europe 2020
 
firebat
Member
Member
Topic Author
Posts: 390
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 8:38 am

RB532A vs RB230 performance?

Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:53 am

Is there some documents that show the performance differences between the RB532A and RB230? The RB230 has a lot more memory but what about thoughput performance, CPU util, etc?
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 24422
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:08 pm

RB500 is faster. They are different platforms, 230 is X86, 500 is MIPS. they can't be directly compared, they perform differently at different tasks.
 
firebat
Member
Member
Topic Author
Posts: 390
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 8:38 am

Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:02 am

I'm looking for benchmark comparisons betweent he two. If an RB230 is behind an AP doing queuing and forwarding, will it be faster/slower than a 532? How about in core routing implementation at higher data throughput? The CPU architecture is completely different but that should not affect a benchmark comparison. Is there some data somewhere?
 
Dryanta
newbie
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 7:39 pm

Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:54 am

A good rule of thumb is more ram is better for backhauls and more cpu is good for aps.
 
Diganet
Member
Member
Posts: 349
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 9:30 pm
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:44 am

A good rule of thumb is more ram is better for backhauls and more cpu is good for aps.
Exactly why is RAM good for backhaul links?

/Henrik
 
firebat
Member
Member
Topic Author
Posts: 390
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 8:38 am

Wed Jan 24, 2007 3:44 am

RAM would be good for congested backhauls as well as AP queueing.


Are there some non n-stream throughput/benchmark performance data just for the 532A?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests