Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
steger
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Topic Author
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 9:17 am

MT-60GHz level 3 license

Mon Jan 25, 2021 5:30 pm

hi there,

i have tried to setup an MT-60GHz "bridge" and "station-bridge" together. - back to back was successful and was working in the lab.
now i have installed both on the field (approx 800m distance with open visibility) and both devices not connecting any more.
any power limits due the level 3 license? on both ends? (or do i need the level 4 license on the "bridge" and set it to "ap-bridge" ?)
any other hints? -> sw version: 6.46.8

thank you!

christian
 
User avatar
bpwl
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2984
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2019 1:16 am

Re: MT-60GHz level 3 license

Mon Jan 25, 2021 6:20 pm

Level 3 limits you to "bridge" versus "AP bridge", that is one client versus many clients.
I have not seen any limitation on power with level 3. So level 4 should make no difference.

In the hardware list, not all 60 GHz devices can handle 800 meter. (And "up to" usually means in ideal situation not in all circumstances).
https://i.mt.lv/cdn/product_files/ptp_210150.pdf
 
r00t
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 672
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2017 2:14 am

Re: MT-60GHz level 3 license

Mon Jan 25, 2021 6:23 pm

no, level 3 license only limits number of clients that can connect to the AP (ie. you can use bridge and not create AP for multiple clients).
There is no difference in power limit or anything else.
Your problem is probably too long distance for small antennas, inaccurate pointing or using channel with high water vapor attenuation (try the highest channel).
 
steger
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Topic Author
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 9:17 am

Re: MT-60GHz level 3 license

Mon Jan 25, 2021 7:03 pm

no, level 3 license only limits number of clients that can connect to the AP (ie. you can use bridge and not create AP for multiple clients).
There is no difference in power limit or anything else.
Your problem is probably too long distance for small antennas, inaccurate pointing or using channel with high water vapor attenuation (try the highest channel).
thank you for your fast answer!

great!

christian

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests