Keep dreamingand poe on all ether ports
CCR2004 no switch chip.RB3011 is too big.
There is absolutely no need to combine router with the switch for devices of this grade.The main problem is, If there is switch in CCR2004 people won't buy CRS309 or such devices.
DDR3 memory is really cheap today. Currently released WIFI wave 2 driver only works for ARM devices with more than 256 MB of RAM. It will take MT a lot of time to modify the driver to fit that tiny RAM. Time to market is the core advantage of a company's products. Don't waste of time. Others are working on wifi6 and wifi6e. Maybe WIFI7 is coming soon."HAP AC2 lack memory"
What you need more memory for on that tiny thing?
What are the alternatives? The Ubiquiti Edgerouters lack features while being slightly slower and higher priced, TP-Link Omada is junk, Cisco co$t$ thou$and$, and making a Pf/OPNsense thing would break the bank compared to the RB4011's cool $150 pricetag.If you need your "RB5011" then either look around and see if some available devices may do what you need or just don't buy Mikrotik at all.
Guess what? Performance doesn't come for free.What are the alternatives?If you need your "RB5011" then either look around and see if some available devices may do what you need or just don't buy Mikrotik at all.
I just want the features that the RB4011 has (compact size, no-fuss OS system) but I don't want it 3 years outdated.Guess what? Performance doesn't come for free.
If you need performance because you have high speed WAN link for which you spend considerable amount of money, then spend some on decent router as well.
I don't want it 3 years outdated.
The processor could be a lot better. It uses Cortex A15 CPUs, which were released way back in 2012, 9 years ago!Which part of RB4011 is 3 years outdated?
Fast path means nothing to me anyway, since to use queues you need to disable it.But why can't it be implement on x86 ? I known there is no HWNAT in Tilera chipset but It indeed have fast path.
You known, as lack of some key features such as Fast-path & Fast-track. X86 is treated as a second-line product by MT. It can’t even support the old platform like J1900 well (USB not working). So the "insanely long support time" is a joke.Fast path means nothing to me anyway, since to use queues you need to disable it.But why can't it be implement on x86 ? I known there is no HWNAT in Tilera chipset but It indeed have fast path.