https://fccid.io/TV7CPGI52XL
i hope this one will come with wifiwave2 as standard.
hell, it could be the first wifi6 device from Mikrotik if it is IPQ6018 (2x2+2x2) or IPQ8074 (8x8+4x4) based...
Same IPQ4018 according to the photos.if it is IPQ6018 (2x2+2x2) or IPQ8074 (8x8+4x4) based...
With announcement of RB5009 I hoped better hardware with WIFI will soon follow... but apparently not.
I saw a photo of the new wAP AC and it does seem to have changed to PCB antennas, I wonder how much of a difference these are compared to the plate antennas?Looking forward to a wAP AC XL too with similar 'internals'
MikroTik has the ability to jump the queue, often that involves paying more
Be realistic, we are in the midst of a global chip shortage with lead times from Qualcomm on some WiFi products at 60 weeks..
I agree. There is no point trying to beat no-name cheap white-label junk. There is nothing to win.MikroTik needs to stop scraping the bottom of the barrel and focus on better products, charge more money for them and make it worth it, but its just not worth saving a few pennies when its harmful to the end customers deployments
Now that the cat is out of the bag: Will the mounting plate of the cAP ac be compatible with the cAP XL ac? That would make for an easy upgrade path.
I didn't buy a cap XL AC. There is no way I would continue to deploy radios that can't even be updated to 2016 standards.Damn, that review does not look good. Wonder how it can be so much worse than the original? Maybe you got a bad model.
Aye it's not a terrible product, it's just the competition in this space has hotted up and moved the game forward so much from 10-15 years ago.Yes it's the best performance I have seen from a Mikrotik radio... But it's still years behind the times. Especially with this annoying group key update coming around again.
We realistically can't use it for more than one SSID and have to log into each radio... Like it's Linksys WRT, 15 years ago.