Very nice But do they come with a integrated antenna box? (Like the RIC522C). If that is the case I want the new rb411. If not I am afraid we have to stick with the rb133c in the RIC522C option.
the RB400 is many many times faster ...
Yes, but you don't anymore and is the 133's not a replacement for the 112's. It could have been the 111b and 132b.it's because we used to have a 111 and 112
Hey Bill. Did you ever get round to testing a couple of 411's back to back? Seems the 411 outperforms both the old RB532 and the RB333 so going to run some tests to see how close to the RB600 they get on wireless performance.have as yet to try two 411's together as a bridge but tests so far tell us we are going to use 411's for backhaul links as they really do push hard for their price and out performing a 333 in this mode with nstreme is a no brainer.
Single ethernet is a bit of an issue as it would make it difficult to swap out some of our older 532 based AP's and the 433's are just a bit too big. Are the ones on your 20km link 411's or 411a's? Also, are you running NStreme, WDS and turbo on that link as that should really test the CPUhi,
yep got two as a 20km link bridge, goes as fast as the radios will go.
CPU doesn't hit full load at all.
could really do with a 412 with the 133 layout (opposing dual mini pci slots), ideal for gateways!