Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
cookednoodles
just joined
Topic Author
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 3:49 pm

Is this what i'm after ?

Tue Nov 16, 2010 4:19 pm

I'm looking to forward a lot of ports and our 'dumb' switches can't do it. So I'm looking to put something in front the The RB450G looks like an ideal choice, and more adapted than an atom based machine.

I'm looking to forward around 300 ports on different ip addresses, however I saw somewhere it had a limit of 32 rules ? Can I have others at non wire speed or is it just not possible ?

Thanks
 
User avatar
Ibersystems
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1686
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Cabrils, Barcelona - Spain
Contact:

Re: Is this what i'm after ?

Thu Nov 18, 2010 11:51 pm

What limit? 32 rules where? Uh?

This replyes you? xD
 
User avatar
sergejs
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 6695
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 3:33 pm
Location: Riga, Latvia
Contact:

Re: Is this what i'm after ?

Fri Nov 19, 2010 2:37 pm

I'm looking to forward around 300 ports on different ip addresses, however I saw somewhere it had a limit of 32 rules ? Can I have others at non wire speed or is it just not possible ?
There is no any limit for RB450G.
 
xxiii
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 234
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 12:55 am

Re: Is this what i'm after ?

Fri Nov 19, 2010 7:29 pm

The 32 rules is specifically for the switch chip (in some of the routerboard models) on-board rules. If you use the regular RouterOS rules, you're probably only limited by the memory and cpu and how efficiently you write the rules.
 
cookednoodles
just joined
Topic Author
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 3:49 pm

Re: Is this what i'm after ?

Sun Nov 21, 2010 6:56 pm

Thanks for the replies, it would make sense to put my most used rules on the switch and the rest via the cpu.

I know this is a vague question, and depends on the traffic streams, type etc... but would the routerboard be able to sustain 20-30mbps of traffic of traffic switched with a lot of forwarding rules depending on the ip / port.

Traffic coming in via the first port, and passed to the second port.
 
xxiii
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 234
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 12:55 am

Re: Is this what i'm after ?

Mon Nov 22, 2010 7:41 pm

The switch chip is mainly geared to layer-2 stuff, and has pretty limited capabilities compared to the regular routerOS rules.

If they (mikrotik) approached the underlying implementation correctly (I don't know, but I would assume/hope so) since your forwards rely on IP address as well as the port, it should be able to handle 300 forwards just as easily 1 forward.

It should be able to handle 20-30mbit, unless possibly they are all small packets; or you have a bunch of additional rules, in which case it would depend.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests