Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
nelson6069
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 203
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 5:56 pm

is CCR1016-12G able to handle this?

Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:59 pm

is CCR1016-12G able to handle this?
the environment is hostel. so i have max 400 concurrent users.
i will using this router to do this jobs:
1)Load balancing with 4 X 20Mbps(Download/upload)-dynamic ip address from ISP
2)NAT
3)Qos
4)Hotspot authentication with limited time (all wireless access)
5)DHCP server
6)Equal bandwidth base on active users.
7)remote access

is CCR1016-12G able to handle this?
or any recommendation?
 
User avatar
shahbazian
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 169
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 6:22 pm
Location: Iran
Contact:

Re: is CCR1016-12G able to handle this?

Tue Mar 05, 2013 12:21 am

I think this is the router for you.
Because we've done some similar projects and the amount of load is somewhat less than that, We don't had problems with this router and the RB1100AHx2 been responsive.
But I think to ensure more and the ability to upgrade in the future better use of the CCR1036-12G-4S.
 
nelson6069
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 203
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 5:56 pm

Re: is CCR1016-12G able to handle this?

Tue Mar 05, 2013 7:49 pm

I think this is the router for you.
Because we've done some similar projects and the amount of load is somewhat less than that, We don't had problems with this router and the RB1100AHx2 been responsive.
But I think to ensure more and the ability to upgrade in the future better use of the CCR1036-12G-4S.

so you think 1pcs of router is enough or need split into 2?

if split into 2:
1st router jobs
1)Load balancing with 4 X 20Mbps(Download/upload)-dynamic ip address from ISP
2)NAT
3)DHCP server
4)remote access

2nd router jobs
1)Equal bandwidth base on active users.
2)Qos
3)Hotspot authentication with limited time (all wireless access)

may i know which will use more CPU?
 
Dobby
Member
Member
Posts: 399
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 12:07 am
Location: Hogwarts

Re: is CCR1016-12G able to handle this?

Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:10 pm

Deleted because not related.
Last edited by Dobby on Mon Mar 11, 2013 12:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
 
beta2000
just joined
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 11:13 am

Re: is CCR1016-12G able to handle this?

Sat Mar 09, 2013 10:00 pm

Hi Nelson,

I think CCR series is better than RB series in your case. Here is an example which with 5x20Mbps load balance, policy route, about 100 users, hotspot and qos. It's using x86 version ROS with an Intel E2140 1.6GHz x2 and 512MB RAM.
QQ截图20130310034828.jpg
QQ截图20130310034911.jpg
QQ截图20130310034900.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
User avatar
shahbazian
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 169
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 6:22 pm
Location: Iran
Contact:

Re: is CCR1016-12G able to handle this?

Sat Feb 15, 2014 8:21 pm

Hi nelson6069
I think if you use CCR1036, You can use all config in one router. You may even use CCR1016.
So I recommend CCR136 for that
 
User avatar
Kreacher
Member
Member
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 3:58 pm
Location: Hogwarts

Re: is CCR1016-12G able to handle this?

Fri Feb 28, 2014 8:44 am

Hello nelson6069,
the environment is hostel. so i have max 400 concurrent users.
Are they all at the same time online I suggest you also to take a bigger one
or you have the time to wait until all cores are smooth working on ROS
it would be the router for you I think, but the CCR1036 would be a better choice for you
1)Load balancing with 4 X 20Mbps(Download/upload)-dynamic ip address from ISP
Pretty sure it will.
2)NAT
Yes it will if you setting up a netfilter rule first and then a second one that tells
all other rules using the netfilter rule first, you also have SPI in the game! ;-)
3)Qos
If massively QoS rules will be used the entire router performance
can be really narrowed down, but this is also pending on the multi core
usage that is not really running now, as I see it.
4)Hotspot authentication with limited time (all wireless access)
5)DHCP server
6)Equal bandwidth base on active users.
7)remote access
No problem I think.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests