Fri May 05, 2006 10:56 pm
Umm... in that test, they had 4x RB 532's in parallel, each handling 1/4 the traffic - the aggregate was handled by P4's according to the information on the website. Still, that would be an impressive 75Mbps per RB532 on ethernet<>wireless (have never seen anything like that myself on RB532's using Nstreme - probably it was without)
I don't have an "ethernet-only" (non-wireless) figure for RB532s, best to post the question on the "general networking" section. See below on routing complexity though.
The limitation is generally the CPU on the main board - the 564 just adds more ports to the PCI bus, increases the aggregate potential traffic, all of which has to go throught the CPU.
Adding wireless will slow you down. "atheros processing" as I tend to call it, seems to take more CPU cycles than wired ethernet ports, especially if you have security and/or Nstreme enabled.
At the price, I'd suggest buy an RB532 and stress-test it in your application. The degree of routing complexity etc and packet sizes all make a difference to throughput.
If it isn't enough, there are plenty of solutions for faster routers. We build Pent-M and AMD boxes for example, and you can get ~1Gbps through a wired ethernet interface with some of those.
Good luck -
Regards
CableFree Solutions