Not bad for 106 KM :)
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2015 6:25 am
I must say im impressed. I was hoping to get around 30 Mbps. Was also not expecting this signal strength event though RadioMobile was spot on.! -58 both chains.!
I have to confess that i get half these results with same gear in semi urban environment at a third of the distance.!
Why? what benefit will that give?Test with TCP and post results
TCP test is closer to real life dataWhy? what benefit will that give?Test with TCP and post results
OMG not again!TCP test is closer to real life dataWhy? what benefit will that give?Test with TCP and post results
it was true 10+ years ago, when i was in university Professors repeated this over and over again...TCP test is closer to real life data
could you please give an example of "real life TCP" ?TCP test is closer to real life data
How can you tell?while i was writing this post on my main gateway - 73,6% of client's traffic was UDP, 21.2% was TCP, rest was GRE, ICMP.
I created passthrough rules for TCP, UDP and ICMP and one rule for all traffic, that quickly found out that GRE was also present, it is easy to set up.How can you tell?
Also check the CPU on the routerboard when running TCP test, it usually maxes out, so your TCP test is ONLY limited to what the CPU can handle. I've done TCP tests over PtP links on the radios themselves, and seen horrible results, but then test with RB1100AHx2 boards behind each end, and seen 300mb/s, whereas the ptp radios can only handle 80-120Synthetic test TCP on mikrotik gives more credible results for passing data over wireless links. This is my opinion based on my personal experience. I have seen speeds over 500Mbps when using UDP, but TCP is near 200Mbps - that is big difference. So i expect on this particular link TCP speed test should be around 110Mbps, which is actualy OK.