+1I am still waiting for a descent alignment procedure. This is the biggest downfall.
Still need these Chris?What are the commands to set 66000 and add 66000 in the scan list on the client and AP sides?
Thanks guys.New beta versions has alignment mode included (it will update information much faster)
to use run from CLI:
/interface w60g align wlan60-1
https://www.ip-sa.com.pl/doc/datasheet/LHG_Lite60.pdf3.png
Pictures and Specifications.... Please.
At 370m with good alignment a couple of LHG 'd work close to gigabit FD due to alignment problem with the standard bracket I suggest to you to use this http://www.cdr.pl/p6418,uchwyt-precyzyj ... adkit.htmlDear users, what is Your real world bandwidth usage?
Is lhg60 in short distance ptp scenario really able to push ~1gbps ?
I just put up a 370m link to feed few hundred users from 1gb/s fiber and I wonder if it's gonna work or should I look for more sophisticated FDX solution?
artferrrWe use LHG-60G on link ~900 meters. We have 1 gbit/sec in duplex mode bandwith-test. We try to establish link in 1.5km - fail.
How did I miss that. Nice Blue nice alignment I was going to test 2000m next week.My working link is 2205m. Rain haven't fall in more than a month, so I don't know how it will behave. 5GHz is backup.
Please look at this post:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=133374&start=50#p680529
I am looking at RSSI.For all of you that don't seem to be dropping, how are you aligning your LHG's and even WAP60G's if using those. My disconnects have to be coming from an alignment issue.
Are you using Signal, RSSI, sector info?
These long-range links use a non-standard and illegal 66000 frequency. Any chance for MT to implement 66960 and possibly 69120 too? Still illegal in many parts of the world, but at least standard (channels 5 and 6), doesn't interfere with 64800 which may need to work at the same location too. Or is this beyond the capabilities of current hardware?
Is the Left/Right - Up/Down - Center alignment working properly using this with latest 6.44Beta28 ?New beta versions has alignment mode included (it will update information much faster)
to use run from CLI:
/interface w60g align wlan60-1
I don't believe what it reports. I am looking only at RSSI. It is tricky to align it without precise alignment kit, but spend a little more time than usual since beam is very narrow (that is a good thing).Is the Left/Right - Up/Down - Center alignment working properly using this with latest 6.44Beta28 ?New beta versions has alignment mode included (it will update information much faster)
to use run from CLI:
/interface w60g align wlan60-1
1/ not at the timeThanks for reply, but I see it quite expensive bracket. And with my brick chimney 50m high, windload gives a lot of instability overall.
So i'm not sure if it will help.
1/As for now I see signal 90-105 and mcs 8 to 11, are higher mcs even possible?
2/And what about pps or tcp is this arm cpu capable of doing 1gbps TCP traffic? I've seen some iperf test to fill 950mbps of tcp but seen only tests.
3/Anybody use this gear in real world and achieves such bandwidth?
This is what I am seeing when running the align test from the Bridge unit:Is the Left/Right - Up/Down - Center alignment working properly using this with latest 6.44Beta28 ?New beta versions has alignment mode included (it will update information much faster)
to use run from CLI:
/interface w60g align wlan60-1
I found the problem... Do Not go to QuickSet screen to check on frequency or try to select the 64800 frequency. If you do, you will notice that 64800 is not listed. And if you then exit the QuickSet screen by selecting OK, the radio will revert back to Auto and select a different frequency. You have to go back to wlan60-1 interface and select the 64800 frequency there. Or go to Wireless interface to select 64800 frequency. - - I believe that you should look at having the 64800 show up in the drop down of the QuickSet screen.This is what I am seeing when running the align test from the Bridge unit:Is the Left/Right - Up/Down - Center alignment working properly using this with latest 6.44Beta28 ?New beta versions has alignment mode included (it will update information much faster)
to use run from CLI:
/interface w60g align wlan60-1
connected: yes
frequency: 64800
remote-address: xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 90
rssi: -57
tx-sector: 36
tx-sector-info: center
distance: 1473.14m
tx-packet-error-rate: 0%
However, after I ran the align test, the Bridge unit defaulted back to Frequency 58320... Why does it change frequency?
connected: yes
frequency: 58320
remote-address: xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 90
rssi: -54
tx-sector: 27
tx-sector-info: center
distance: 1473.19m
tx-packet-error-rate: 0%
Dude read the fcking post here. I've post that I have 399m link working 1Gbps and no disconnect with HEAVY RAIN. We talking Noah Ark biblical rain here right.Trying to work out if I should waste my time trying a 320 metre link with a pair of Wireless Wires?
Don't need 1Gbit - I'd be happy with 200 bit. Is this going to fly based on people's experience with latest firmware?
Uh... your link is 400m. I certainly hope that it won't drop with such a short distance. Most problems start with links above 1km. 60Ghz is nothing like 5Ghz: the signal fades _a lot_ faster with distance. That's why you can't do long distances and that's why there is little or no interferences between two links.I'm just want to share my experience with PtP W60G link.
We've deployed this link about 45 days ago. Since then we have experience HEAVY rain (2 days non-stop) and light snowing. Link hasn't disconnected once and lowest MCM was 6.
I've read that people have problems with allignment but we all have because it's not easy and even 0.5 degree can make a difference. You should use terminal to see both sides and everytime you make change wait about 20-30s until information is updated. Also use ping to see if the link is table and once you feel like you got it just do BT Test.
RSSI: -55
Distance:399m
Not really professional or appropriate to speak to other people that way when they are asking for help.Dude read the fcking post here. I've post that I have 399m link working 1Gbps and no disconnect with HEAVY RAIN. We talking Noah Ark biblical rain here right.Trying to work out if I should waste my time trying a 320 metre link with a pair of Wireless Wires?
Don't need 1Gbit - I'd be happy with 200 bit. Is this going to fly based on people's experience with latest firmware?
So read my post and like Nike commercial says "just do it".
Especially since he says Wireless Wire (i.e. Wap60) and not Wireless Wire Dish (LHG60). To answer, no. I would not use Wireless Wire at that distanceDude read the fcking post here. I've post that I have 399m link working 1Gbps and no disconnect with HEAVY RAIN. We talking Noah Ark biblical rain here right.Trying to work out if I should waste my time trying a 320 metre link with a pair of Wireless Wires?
Don't need 1Gbit - I'd be happy with 200 bit. Is this going to fly based on people's experience with latest firmware?
So read my post and like Nike commercial says "just do it".
Not really professional or appropriate to speak to other people that way when they are asking for help.
lol Eliot you wrote " PtP W60G link." gr0mit wrote "Wireless Wires" so I m confused there is LHG60G and wAP-60GDude read the fcking post here. I've post that I have 399m link working 1Gbps and no disconnect with HEAVY RAIN. We talking Noah Ark biblical rain here right.Trying to work out if I should waste my time trying a 320 metre link with a pair of Wireless Wires?
Don't need 1Gbit - I'd be happy with 200 bit. Is this going to fly based on people's experience with latest firmware?
So read my post and like Nike commercial says "just do it".
So does this mean if I have it @ 200m or 20m I should see -20db? When I was testing in our office (we can get up to 25m) I was only ever able to get them to -49db, at 426m I am sitting around -58db on the 58320 frequency.Uh... your link is 400m. I certainly hope that it won't drop with such a short distance. Most problems start with links above 1km. 60Ghz is nothing like 5Ghz: the signal fades _a lot_ faster with distance. That's why you can't do long distances and that's why there is little or no interferences between two links.I'm just want to share my experience with PtP W60G link.
We've deployed this link about 45 days ago. Since then we have experience HEAVY rain (2 days non-stop) and light snowing. Link hasn't disconnected once and lowest MCM was 6.
I've read that people have problems with allignment but we all have because it's not easy and even 0.5 degree can make a difference. You should use terminal to see both sides and everytime you make change wait about 20-30s until information is updated. Also use ping to see if the link is table and once you feel like you got it just do BT Test.
RSSI: -55
Distance:399m
At 400m, you can just align by sight and get a pretty good result. In fact, -55db for 400m is not a good signal. You should be able to get much better.
With the dish (LHG60G)? Should probably be around -30/-35. At 400m, it should be around -45 and at 1km, -55 (with channel 4). With channel 1, it's probably going to drop to -55 for 400m and -65 for 1km.So does this mean if I have it @ 200m or 20m I should see -20db? When I was testing in our office (we can get up to 25m) I was only ever able to get them to -49db, at 426m I am sitting around -58db on the 58320 frequency.
Problem is with beamforming, but there's tun of tutorials on internet to show you how to do it if you know how to google. As for my PtP link I didn't do beamforming and link is stable, that's why I've post my experience since this Topic is named "LHG 60G experience".So does this mean if I have it @ 200m or 20m I should see -20db? When I was testing in our office (we can get up to 25m) I was only ever able to get them to -49db, at 426m I am sitting around -58db on the 58320 frequency.Uh... your link is 400m. I certainly hope that it won't drop with such a short distance. Most problems start with links above 1km. 60Ghz is nothing like 5Ghz: the signal fades _a lot_ faster with distance. That's why you can't do long distances and that's why there is little or no interferences between two links.I'm just want to share my experience with PtP W60G link.
We've deployed this link about 45 days ago. Since then we have experience HEAVY rain (2 days non-stop) and light snowing. Link hasn't disconnected once and lowest MCM was 6.
I've read that people have problems with allignment but we all have because it's not easy and even 0.5 degree can make a difference. You should use terminal to see both sides and everytime you make change wait about 20-30s until information is updated. Also use ping to see if the link is table and once you feel like you got it just do BT Test.
RSSI: -55
Distance:399m
At 400m, you can just align by sight and get a pretty good result. In fact, -55db for 400m is not a good signal. You should be able to get much better.
I've been running down through the thread, where is the disable beam forming at? I will try to align without it, I am guessing we have been impatient with the alignment process, or beamforming is causing us to have a poorly aligned link and correcting it for us. its the set tx-sector=0 ?
Honzam how is 4173m link, any luck with the rain is it stable?
No you will need backupHonzam how is 4173m link, any luck with the rain is it stable?
Thanks.
what is dublex mode ? on LHG 60 you have choice for full dublex and half-dublex ?We use LHG-60G on link ~900 meters. We have 1 gbit/sec in duplex mode bandwith-test. We try to establish link in 1.5km - fail.
One of your ethernet may be connected at 100mbit speed.Thanks for fast replys. You are deploying that tool for us, so you really should expect us to use it
But as we know from other installations and devices that can test there throughput we never expect such tests to be real. So yeah, we tried actual traffic - maybe it was a misspoke here. We tested file transfer with a folder and round about 70 GB of Files with different sizes. Also we had iperf running which was also match with our tested data.
Totally forgot about to mention the version we are using: We run them with 6.43.4
I think we will have a look on our alignment again.
@server8
Is this a set of 2 or do we need to order it twice?
What about 3km link, if I use 66Ghz do I need backup?No you will need backupHonzam how is 4173m link, any luck with the rain is it stable?
Thanks.
One of your ethernet may be connected at 100mbit speed.Thanks for fast replys. You are deploying that tool for us, so you really should expect us to use it
But as we know from other installations and devices that can test there throughput we never expect such tests to be real. So yeah, we tried actual traffic - maybe it was a misspoke here. We tested file transfer with a folder and round about 70 GB of Files with different sizes. Also we had iperf running which was also match with our tested data.
Totally forgot about to mention the version we are using: We run them with 6.43.4
I think we will have a look on our alignment again.
@server8
Is this a set of 2 or do we need to order it twice?
I tried to use align option for alignment the links and update devices to beta version and it's seems broken... when I use align in cli mode rssi and signal change so rapid for ex 50- to -58 but so quick when use monitor its better. which one should I use ?Unfortunately no! They broke it! Use terminal for all of the information...
AP A;I don't use align for same reason - to fast and all-over-the-place update of data. Use normal monitor, but be patient. Move lhg slightly and then wait couple of seconds. I look only at RSSI...
thanks mistry7 for your helpAP side is not aligned 100%
Client shows - 48 and AP -54 so there is a little difference
Hi!https://www.aliexpress.com/item/10000m- ... a4f512def4
1. Install just the LHG mount
2. Allign the mount with the laser
3. Install the dish to the mount.
4. Enjoy
Hi!Maybe with the precision kit the alignment tool works well
http://www.cdr.pl/p6418,uchwyt-precyzyj ... adkit.html
Apparently you do not direct the antenna. We previously worked with SIKLU so there is experience.My 2.6Km link does not want to link up. I'm using 64800 as not totally sure about legalities of 66Ghz in the UK yet. Little bit gutted as I expected at least something.
15M & 20M AGL at the 2 locations with very clear LOS. The Siklu links we have were easier than this!Apparently you do not direct the antenna. We previously worked with SIKLU so there is experience.My 2.6Km link does not want to link up. I'm using 64800 as not totally sure about legalities of 66Ghz in the UK yet. Little bit gutted as I expected at least something.
The main thing that would be direct visibility and accurate guidance. There are more people who have if the link and 4 km.
That's it. Must be the toxicity of the climate of this damn island. You got room for Me+5 at yours right?Hi Steve,
Just send me the airline tickets and I will be glad to stand at one end of the connection to move things around. I am really lucky
On the other hand the fetid vapours of intoxicated Brits (on warm beer) may be a cloud to dense for your traffic ;-PP
We should be getting up to 70 GHz in the UK , will the hardware support this i wonder? There is no "country code" option at the moment. 70GHz would be nice to use.My 2.6Km link does not want to link up. I'm using 64800 as not totally sure about legalities of 66Ghz in the UK yet. Little bit gutted as I expected at least something.
You are completely right:Each version of RouterOS includes a lot of changes, it would help us, if you write versions you are using.
Does it work on 66Ghz?First problems with snow. Links on 800m distances are down
https://translate.google.cz/translate?s ... t=&act=url
Hi!Try to use this http://www.cdr.pl/p6418,uchwyt-precyzyj ... adkit.html to align with better rssi
-48 is very good rssi !!Hi!Try to use this http://www.cdr.pl/p6418,uchwyt-precyzyj ... adkit.html to align with better rssi
I am already using this kit on both sides, but its really strange:
I can see a wide window, where RSSI is about -50db! I just cannot get more than -40 to -50 - no matter if "perfectly alligned" or not.
One more, strange thing:
With 6.43.4, PHY-RATE is sometimes going down, IF there is no traffic on the link. If I start the bandwidth-tester, phys-rate is stable at 2.3 Gbps. Without traffic, it is fluctuating...
And what kind of RSSI do you expect at this distance?!? o.OHi!
Today, I tried to install my first LHG 60G - with not so much success...
399m, perfect LOS. No rain.
RSSI is only -48 NO MATTER, if it is really centered or no, NO matter which frequency. I could not get more than -48.
I found that post and thought, -50db is not good for 400m...With the dish (LHG60G)? Should probably be around -30/-35. At 400m, it should be around -45 and at 1km, -55 (with channel 4). With channel 1, it's probably going to drop to -55 for 400m and -65 for 1km.
I found that post and thought, -50db is not good for 400m...With the dish (LHG60G)? Should probably be around -30/-35. At 400m, it should be around -45 and at 1km, -55 (with channel 4). With channel 1, it's probably going to drop to -55 for 400m and -65 for 1km.
If -50db is o.k.: Do you have any idea, why I do not get a stable tx-phy-rate, although RSSI is good? I tried different channels, beta-firmware and stable-firmware, with and without beam-forming.
I am also confused, that RSSI is the same - no matter, if I align the antenna to center or some degrees left/right and that it is not very stable. It goes up and down all the time for +- 2-3 db
Those values were based on theoretical values for another device and adjusted to LHG based on real life experience. If you have more than -50dB, that's fine. The line won't start to drop before around -70dB so that's plenty margin.I found that post and thought, -50db is not good for 400m...
If -50db is o.k.: Do you have any idea, why I do not get a stable tx-phy-rate, although RSSI is good? I tried different channels, beta-firmware and stable-firmware, with and without beam-forming.
I am also confused, that RSSI is the same - no matter, if I align the antenna to center or some degrees left/right and that it is not very stable. It goes up and down all the time for +- 2-3 db
Do you run Data over the link when you see this?Hi!
But do you have any idea, why the phys-rate is not stable although RSSI is good?
It is best at 64800 MHz, but not perfect stable at 2.3 Gbps.
At lower frequencies, RSSI is still at -50, but phys-rate drops sometimes to 386 Mbps
I tried it with and without traffic. After some time of traffic, phys-rate is mostly 2.3 Gbps but not always. Do you see drops without traffic?Do you run Data over the link when you see this?Hi!
But do you have any idea, why the phys-rate is not stable although RSSI is good?
It is best at 64800 MHz, but not perfect stable at 2.3 Gbps.
At lower frequencies, RSSI is still at -50, but phys-rate drops sometimes to 386 Mbps
Wow! Congratulations!Another record!
Master side:
connected: yes
frequency: 66000
remote-address: 04:D6:AA:XX:XX:XX
tx-mcs: 4
tx-phy-rate: 1155.0Mbps
signal: 50
rssi: -62
tx-sector: 58
tx-sector-info: left 0.6 degrees, up 1.4 degrees
distance: 4332.52m
tx-packet-error-rate: 0%
Slave side:
connected: yes
frequency: 66000
remote-address: 04:D6:AA:XX:XX:XX
tx-mcs: 3
tx-phy-rate: 962.0Mbps
signal: 40
rssi: -65
tx-sector: 22
tx-sector-info: right 1 degrees, down 0.6 degrees
distance: 4332.49m
tx-packet-error-rate: 0%
Wow! Congratulations! +1Another record!
Master side:
connected: yes
frequency: 66000
remote-address: 04:D6:AA:XX:XX:XX
tx-mcs: 4
tx-phy-rate: 1155.0Mbps
signal: 50
rssi: -62
tx-sector: 58
tx-sector-info: left 0.6 degrees, up 1.4 degrees
distance: 4332.52m
tx-packet-error-rate: 0%
Slave side:
connected: yes
frequency: 66000
remote-address: 04:D6:AA:XX:XX:XX
tx-mcs: 3
tx-phy-rate: 962.0Mbps
signal: 40
rssi: -65
tx-sector: 22
tx-sector-info: right 1 degrees, down 0.6 degrees
distance: 4332.49m
tx-packet-error-rate: 0%
You don't need external radio. 5ghz is implemented in same cpu with 60ghz. So, only feed!Only a 5 ghz feed to use with external radio
Well its just for testing purposes, nothing else. Its not even stable....i was just curious how far can it get. Usable distance with pair of LHGs is about 1800m at 66GHz or 1400m with 64,8GHz. Stable in rain about 50mm/h. But for now we need protective cover for whole LHG because the grid of LHG is nicely holding snow and kills every longer link.Congratulations Gemb! How much time did You spent on aligning? I have another 5130 meters link and didn't want even to try, but Gemb give me something to think about
is better to use frequency: 66000 for long distance ? do you have any experience with your tests ?As You can see, both links are working on 66.000! On the central location. antennas are almost back to back, and it looks like it doesn't bother them I tried shorter link at 64ghz, but connection was not stable. I assume that is misalignment related.
Not exactly true -66GHz is mandatory on 2200+ meters!
so ? I can use 66Ghz for 900m link also for better performance.Not exactly true -66GHz is mandatory on 2200+ meters!
connected: yes
frequency: 64800
remote-address: 04:D6:AA:AF:D3:C6
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 80
rssi: -57
distance: 2409.94m
Great info! I correct myself So, what is maximum theoretical distance for 64800?Not exactly true -66GHz is mandatory on 2200+ meters!
connected: yes
frequency: 64800
remote-address: 04:D6:AA:AF:D3:C6
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 80
rssi: -57
distance: 2409.94m
from our experience, the most important thing is to put a good amount of traffic over the link during the alignment. If you don't, the readings are not updated fast enough. Even in alignment mode.Hello
A colleague tried to install the Wireless Wire Dish kit (RBLHGG-60ADKIT), from mainland to an island. Mounted at 3 and 6 meter height, 700 meter over a lake, clear sight and so forth.
Also tried a different kit, same results. Default configuration, but no connection at all. Kits works without problems if next to each other. (ROS within 6.43.*). Used a couple of hours trying to align them with no success at all.
0.7 km with 60 Ghz should give maximum 0.93 m radius on the freznel zone ?
(Freznel zone calculator / formula).
How accurate must the alignment be for a successfull link to take place?
Other than alignment issues what could the problem be?
I would expect to see contact/link after trying long enough, even just for a short while ?
Next try we'll keep these tips in mind:
- Better mounting kits and/or lasers
- Disable beamforming: /interface w60g set 0 tx-sector=36
- Using CLI alignment (quicker/too quick): /interface w60g align wlan60-1
If You could try downgrade to 6.43rc17 and see if it helps, I stumbled on very similar situation and downgrade to rc17 works like a charm.Hello
Also tried a different kit, same results. Default configuration, but no connection at all. Kits works without problems if next to each other. (ROS within 6.43.*). Used a couple of hours trying to align them with no success at all.
please check if scan-list on "station-bridge" device includes frequencies you are trying to use. Alignment needs to be very precise for connection to be established.Yup also using the latest beta. On two separate links of +-1800m and 2000m cannot even make a single link. Using 64800 and 66000. You would think after aiming for a while there would at least be a connection - a bad one at least.
Upcoming Beta version (will be released today or tomorrow) will include rolling avg of RSSI value - "10s-average-rssi"
- With alignment-mode:
Signal varies A LOT! I wrote a script that averages the RSSIs of the last 10s to be able to see anyhing...
and relasedUpcoming Beta version (will be released today or tomorrow) will include rolling avg of RSSI value - "10s-average-rssi"
+1Wherever I can I use second grounding cable in combination with Schrack outdoor s/ftp cable. Anyhow, for me grounding is a must - regardless what many others are telling.
@ Distance XXX????Does anyone have some experience in the use of LHG 60G with wAP 60G AP ?
Yes. I suppose there will be less gain, perhaps 6dB less, so I could suppose a reduction of 50% in distance, 1500m-> 750m. In 750m there is also less fading, so I could suppose that a link from wAP 60G and one or more LHG 60Gs over 500-800m could work at least the same than a 1500m link composed by two LHG 60Gs. Is it right?@ Distance XXX????Does anyone have some experience in the use of LHG 60G with wAP 60G AP ?
Depends on needs for Link,Yes. I suppose there will be less gain, perhaps 6dB less, so I could suppose a reduction of 50% in distance, 1500m-> 750m. In 750m there is also less fading, so I could suppose that a link from wAP 60G and one or more LHG 60Gs over 500-800m could work at least the same than a 1500m link composed by two LHG 60Gs. Is it right?@ Distance XXX????Does anyone have some experience in the use of LHG 60G with wAP 60G AP ?
So, you divided distances by two? Why? Did you experienced a completely down link during rain over nominal distances (ex 200m wap to wap)? Or did you experienced only a reduction in Throughput? And what about wap to SXTsq lite 60?Depends on needs for Link,Yes. I suppose there will be less gain, perhaps 6dB less, so I could suppose a reduction of 50% in distance, 1500m-> 750m. In 750m there is also less fading, so I could suppose that a link from wAP 60G and one or more LHG 60Gs over 500-800m could work at least the same than a 1500m link composed by two LHG 60Gs. Is it right?@ Distance XXX????Does anyone have some experience in the use of LHG 60G with wAP 60G AP ?
with WAP to WAP wo go to 100m
With WAP to LHG we go to 300m
With LHG to LHG we go to 600m
all this cases without Backup link, we saw no drops in rain with this distances, waiting for some snow.....
I have SXTsq 60 here but not deployed, gain difference to WAP60 is unknown.So, you divided distances by two? Why? Did you experienced a completely down link during rain over nominal distances (ex 200m wap to wap)? Or did you experienced only a reduction in Throughput? And what about wap to SXTsq lite 60?Depends on needs for Link,Yes. I suppose there will be less gain, perhaps 6dB less, so I could suppose a reduction of 50% in distance, 1500m-> 750m. In 750m there is also less fading, so I could suppose that a link from wAP 60G and one or more LHG 60Gs over 500-800m could work at least the same than a 1500m link composed by two LHG 60Gs. Is it right?@ Distance XXX????Does anyone have some experience in the use of LHG 60G with wAP 60G AP ?
with WAP to WAP wo go to 100m
With WAP to LHG we go to 300m
With LHG to LHG we go to 600m
all this cases without Backup link, we saw no drops in rain with this distances, waiting for some snow.....
WAP to WAP will drop every rain /snowThe price in this case is not very important, because the difference is not big. I understand that if you put two directional antenna LHG, then accessibility will have to be 99.9999%
But what will be the availability if you put two WAP or WAP-LHG
Shure it will work, but it drop every rain66000 GHz is working on 4000+. Tested in real life...
We have seen snow is a killer for 60GHz. Even light snow fall killed our 1200m link completely.Shure it will work, but it drop every rain66000 GHz is working on 4000+. Tested in real life...
[admin@lhg60-ap] > int w6 monitor wlan60-1
connected: yes
frequency: 58320
remote-address: 24:18:1D:
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 95
rssi: -55
tx-sector: 1
tx-sector-info: left 1 degrees, down 1.4 degrees
distance: 1167.48m
tx-packet-error-rate: 0%
ok. Whats rain? Range for nice day is ok but bad day?66000 GHz is working on 4000+. Tested in real life...
Please, post printscreen Link LHG 60GHz of real +4000mFor my links, falling snow was not issue at all. Only that sticky snow that got stuck on antenna is causing trouble. And of course that You need 5ghz backup for 60ghz link
Please use search or go to viewtopic.php?f=7&t=133374&sid=47ddbc29 ... 00#p699697Please, post printscreen Link LHG 60GHz of real +4000mFor my links, falling snow was not issue at all. Only that sticky snow that got stuck on antenna is causing trouble. And of course that You need 5ghz backup for 60ghz link
My humbly opinion is that oxygen absorption is an obstacle to build devices with bigger dish. I hope that I am wrong. But there is no obstacle to implement 5ghz backup in same device...
pease Givme your Skype or viber plesaePlease use search or go to viewtopic.php?f=7&t=133374&sid=47ddbc29 ... 00#p699697Please, post printscreen Link LHG 60GHz of real +4000mFor my links, falling snow was not issue at all. Only that sticky snow that got stuck on antenna is causing trouble. And of course that You need 5ghz backup for 60ghz link
BR...
I've heard that Mikrotik has released the new LHG 60 Ghz R2 reviewMy humbly opinion is that oxygen absorption is an obstacle to build devices with bigger dish. I hope that I am wrong. But there is no obstacle to implement 5ghz backup in same device...
Pitaj Jocu da ti da moj broj - ja sam Deki iz firme DDNet...pease Givme your Skype or viber plesaePlease use search or go to viewtopic.php?f=7&t=133374&sid=47ddbc29 ... 00#p699697Please, post printscreen Link LHG 60GHz of real +4000mFor my links, falling snow was not issue at all. Only that sticky snow that got stuck on antenna is causing trouble. And of course that You need 5ghz backup for 60ghz link
BR...
Pitaj Jocu da ti da moj broj - ja sam Deki iz firme DDNet...pease Givme your Skype or viber plesaePlease use search or go to viewtopic.php?f=7&t=133374&sid=47ddbc29 ... 00#p699697Please, post printscreen Link LHG 60GHz of real +4000mFor my links, falling snow was not issue at all. Only that sticky snow that got stuck on antenna is causing trouble. And of course that You need 5ghz backup for 60ghz link
e pa da, pricao mije da tebe da ima odlicna iskustva
063/7320073
kuckamo se tamo na Vieru
BR...
Pitaj Jocu da ti da moj broj - ja sam Deki iz firme DDNet...pease Givme your Skype or viber plesaePlease use search or go to viewtopic.php?f=7&t=133374&sid=47ddbc29 ... 00#p699697
Please, post printscreen Link LHG 60GHz of real +4000m
e pa da, pricao mije da tebe da ima odlicna iskustva
kuckamo se tamo na Vieru
BR...
autostoper76 ?????I've heard that Mikrotik has released the new LHG 60 Ghz R2 review
for range up to 6000m and embedded wifi 5GHZ
Pitaj Jocu da ti da moj broj - ja sam Deki iz firme DDNet...pease Givme your Skype or viber plesaePlease use search or go to viewtopic.php?f=7&t=133374&sid=47ddbc29 ... 00#p699697
Please, post printscreen Link LHG 60GHz of real +4000m
e pa da, pricao mije da tebe da ima odlicna iskustva
kuckamo se tamo na Vieru
BR...
I can't find anything on a new R2 version. Do you have any more information? We run 5GHZ backup paths on every LHG60, but an integrated backup would be so much easier.I've heard that Mikrotik has released the new LHG 60 Ghz R2 review
for range up to 6000m and embedded wifi 5GHZ
Pitaj Jocu da ti da moj broj - ja sam Deki iz firme DDNet...pease Givme your Skype or viber plesaePlease use search or go to viewtopic.php?f=7&t=133374&sid=47ddbc29 ... 00#p699697
Please, post printscreen Link LHG 60GHz of real +4000m
e pa da, pricao mije da tebe da ima odlicna iskustva
kuckamo se tamo na Vieru
BR...
Please, Ask Mikrotik Directly about the more detailsI can't find anything on a new R2 version. Do you have any more information? We run 5GHZ backup paths on every LHG60, but an integrated backup would be so much easier.I've heard that Mikrotik has released the new LHG 60 Ghz R2 review
for range up to 6000m and embedded wifi 5GHZ
@MT take my moneyPlease, Ask Mikrotik Directly about the more detailsI can't find anything on a new R2 version. Do you have any more information? We run 5GHZ backup paths on every LHG60, but an integrated backup would be so much easier.I've heard that Mikrotik has released the new LHG 60 Ghz R2 review
for range up to 6000m and embedded wifi 5GHZ
The new LHG 60GHz R2
Have a distance of about 6,000 metar and More...
MIKROTIK is in the testing phase of the new R2 version
there are people on the forum who know more details
The biggest change is in the antenna - the construction
RX and TX
Resistance to rain, snow ...
prices will be twice as expensive
UBNT take my money (If MTK60G end up like 802.11ac)@MT take my moneyPlease, Ask Mikrotik Directly about the more detailsI can't find anything on a new R2 version. Do you have any more information? We run 5GHZ backup paths on every LHG60, but an integrated backup would be so much easier.I've heard that Mikrotik has released the new LHG 60 Ghz R2 review
for range up to 6000m and embedded wifi 5GHZ
The new LHG 60GHz R2
Have a distance of about 6,000 metar and More...
MIKROTIK is in the testing phase of the new R2 version
there are people on the forum who know more details
The biggest change is in the antenna - the construction
RX and TX
Resistance to rain, snow ...
prices will be twice as expensive
support up to 6,000 meter !!!So Mikrotik is making an "R2" (release 2?) version of the LHG-60 dish that will support up to 4,000 meter (2.5 mile)? Complete new design on dish, that allows higher gain and harder to align?
UBNT gets *nothing* finished these days. LHG60 works great.UBNT take my money (If MTK60G end up like 802.11ac)@MT take my moneyPlease, Ask Mikrotik Directly about the more detailsI can't find anything on a new R2 version. Do you have any more information? We run 5GHZ backup paths on every LHG60, but an integrated backup would be so much easier.I've heard that Mikrotik has released the new LHG 60 Ghz R2 review
for range up to 6000m and embedded wifi 5GHZ
The new LHG 60GHz R2
Have a distance of about 6,000 metar and More...
MIKROTIK is in the testing phase of the new R2 version
there are people on the forum who know more details
The biggest change is in the antenna - the construction
RX and TX
Resistance to rain, snow ...
prices will be twice as expensive
I wonder if its only backup failover, or you can agregate 2 links 60+5ghz at the same time for bigger throughput along for instant failover.Yes LHG60 is great hardware with improved distance and 5 GHZ backup it 'll be a must for 2019 wating for more info
what do you expect more if you bond 5ghz+60ghz? anyway there is 1gbps ethernet port, i dont get your idea (:
my point, just to get ANY connection during bad weather, okay let it be at least 100mbps for snow fall or heavy rain, so the customers would not fuck up to red our phones
What if you go a bit out of range or a little bad weather hits and u dont have 1gb anymore, like have 800mbit, 5ghz would push that 200mbit back giving you full 1gbs again, doesnt matter if u go over 1gbs combined 60+5ghz during ideal conditions which would saturate your gigabit ethernt port, its about quality of service and failover.what do you expect more if you bond 5ghz+60ghz? anyway there is 1gbps ethernet port, i dont get your idea (:
my point, just to get ANY connection during bad weather, okay let it be at least 100mbps for snow fall or heavy rain, so the customers would not fuck up to red our phones
WOW, this looks great. Much cheaper then the solution from Poland. I can't wait to try itI see everybody suggesting a specific 3rd party precision alignment mount but nobody suggested the Mikrotik solidMount
https://mikrotik.com/product/solidmount
It does look proper for the job and it is actually half price from the 3rd party one. Has anybody got any experience with it? Is it any good?
I waiting to get it....I see everybody suggesting a specific 3rd party precision alignment mount but nobody suggested the Mikrotik solidMount
https://mikrotik.com/product/solidmount
It does look proper for the job and it is actually half price from the 3rd party one. Has anybody got any experience with it? Is it any good?
No problem for the short one use a WAG60+WAG60, for the middle two use WAG60+LHG60 and for the last 2 use LHG60+LHG60
if the 5 links are on the same tower remember that 64800 MHz overlaps partially 66000 MHz so you have to separate LHGs in angle and distance.
Use higher channel for longer links
Hi, we have 3 different installations,I have 5 different PtP links that I would like to upgrade to 60GHz.
The distances are:
40m
160m
185m
460m
1280m
There is never any snow and heavy rains are rear. I was planning to use LHG60 wireless wire dish for all of them but somebody suggested that the dish would not be good for the 40m link and that I should possibly use the wAP60G for the short links.
.................
Dear DJ Volt,..
Forget about the 5GHz backup in the same device Our solution will be with 2 x RPSMA
Hi, we have 3 different installations,I have 5 different PtP links that I would like to upgrade to 60GHz.
The distances are:
40m
160m
185m
460m
1280m
There is never any snow and heavy rains are rear. I was planning to use LHG60 wireless wire dish for all of them but somebody suggested that the dish would not be good for the 40m link and that I should possibly use the wAP60G for the short links.
.................
Fisrt- 1.183 mtrs. above 60 percent of signal where both sites are visible each other.
Second- 806 mtrs same conditions before, no more 80% of signal
Third- 679 mtrs same as before 80% of signal.
The best speed in TCP is 500Mb upload and donload in send/recive mode, with 80%, in 60% we are talking about 150 Mb in both directions at same time.
But we have a problem, at first group, with default configuration, and both 60G connected, do not ping response
What do I have to do for repair this? Please help me.
Thanks
PD: We speak Spanish too
BTest or iperf? On that distances you must have 940/940Mbps TCP/IP... BTest use only one core!!!!!!Hi, we have 3 different installations,
Fisrt- 1.183 mtrs. above 60 percent of signal where both sites are visible each other.
Second- 806 mtrs same conditions before, no more 80% of signal
Third- 679 mtrs same as before 80% of signal.
The best speed in TCP is 500Mb upload and donload in send/recive mode, with 80%, in 60% we are talking about 150 Mb in both directions at same time.
But we have a problem, at first group, with default configuration, and both 60G connected, do not ping response
What do I have to do for repair this? Please help me.
Thanks
PD: We speak Spanish too
I do it again todayCan you read at all my posts?????
Frequency: 64800, I write to you that YOU MUST CHANGE 66000 to 64800 on that distance on ALU dishes !!!!
ALU 400 works extremely great on 64800 up to 1500meters
So you are in wrong and you make the basic mistakes my friend
DJ voltCan you read at all my posts?????
Frequency: 64800, I write to you that YOU MUST CHANGE 66000 to 64800 on that distance on ALU dishes !!!!
ALU 400 works extremely great on 64800 up to 1500meters
So you are in wrong and you make the basic mistakes my friend
Finally some wise wordsYou can't just make a random aluminum dish and expect it to be better just because of material. There are calibrations done, specifically for the original grid. Antenna design is a precise science, not a form of metallurgy.
Indeed. Especially remember that the higher the frequency (hence, the shorter the wavelength) the most precision needed.You can't just make a random aluminum dish and expect it to be better just because of material. There are calibrations done, specifically for the original grid. Antenna design is a precise science, not a form of metallurgy.
Best is to use the heat of the radio/board itself. We see problems with snow on the longer links even if it does not hang to the antenna. Seems to have more influence on 60GHz than rain.Indeed. Especially remember that the higher the frequency (hence, the shorter the wavelength) the most precision needed.You can't just make a random aluminum dish and expect it to be better just because of material. There are calibrations done, specifically for the original grid. Antenna design is a precise science, not a form of metallurgy.
The only solution I imagine for the ice problems is heating and/or some water repellent treatment. There are specific PTFE based sprays for that. Or maybe something like silicone based lubricant.
I'm waiting for some snow here to try but in 50 years I've seen less than 5 serious snow events.
Yes, problematic with the LHG though, I doubt the dish gets warm enogh.Best is to use the heat of the radio/board itself. We see problems with snow on the longer links even if it does not hang to the antenna. Seems to have more influence on 60GHz than rain.
Still connected? Signal 40 and 700meters is still connected??? Where is 1500 meters???LEDs in your picture show that it's still connected
Eh Normis, I understand your frustration, but our product does not criticize your product, our product helps in the sale of your product like LHG60 etcI understand that selling your product kind of relies on you criticizing the original product, but this is getting ridiculous. Please stop.
Hello aismeI did a quick test link today between LHG60s and distance 167m. The link came up and was connected but I assume it needed further adjustment because the values were all low: MCS 3 and phy-rate 923mbps. RSSI -65.
The frequency was at 58Ghz and just for testing I changed it to 66000 manually on both sides. The link immediately dropped and never came back.
Does anybody know why the link disconnected because of the frequency change?
Hi Dear Normis,I understand that selling your product kind of relies on you criticizing the original product, but this is getting ridiculous. Please stop.
Please.Eh Normis, I understand your frustration, but our product does not criticize your product, our product helps in the sale of your product like LHG60 etcI understand that selling your product kind of relies on you criticizing the original product, but this is getting ridiculous. Please stop.
We have only upgrades for your products that improves your products, not whole products...
Like Mercedes and AMG, AMG helps to sell Mercedes so LHG60 is Mercedes but AMG is Alu Dish + Front Cover + feeder + electronic from whole LHG60, thats all
Instead of helping us, you will still be angry :{
Like in AC on arm so NEVER I think better solution will be IgniteNet with Alu Dishes, no problem to transfer 2,5GHi Dear Normis,I understand that selling your product kind of relies on you criticizing the original product, but this is getting ridiculous. Please stop.
when will the new Wireless Link 60ghz ? or 24 GHz or 80 GHz
Yes of course: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_cont ... 8On7sLnv_kPlease.
Is there any test of Alu400 ?
What are your experiences?
ALU400 vs Original 60GHz
To be honest, I thought about it, and at the time of writing the post I translated it for 66000 so far. We'll see / observeMaybe check 66G or downgrade to 6.42.11
I've found out that a small amount of radioactivity is more effective. I am testing by fixing a piece of Tungsten-Thorium welding electrode. The beta particles emitted by the decay from Ra-228 to Ac-228 seem to help repel the water molecules from sticking to the surface.Now we project the heater for our alu dishes, alu dish will be always warm <15 degree I think will be 24V, on the back will be waterproof gland with LAN port like in alu dishes Gen2
/interface w60g monitor 0
connected: yes
frequency: 64800
remote-address: 24:18:1D:63:62:56
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 85
rssi: -53
tx-sector: 36
tx-sector-info: center
distance: 395.18m
tx-packet-error-rate: 0%
This is only 400meters, the power is to strange with alu dishes, without limit the power this link I think will be unstable. Please set beamforming to 36, if doesnt help please downgrade to last stable version like 6.42.11 and set tx-power to 5Update for ALU vs LHG dish:
The ALU dish has a strange behaviour: RSSI is good, Signal ist good, but MCS is unstable!
With LHG-dish, i see a stable MCS of 8 (PHY Rate: 2.3 Gbps). With the upgrade-kit, MCS goes up and down from 4 to 8.
Do you have any other idea, to make the LHG "snow-proof"?
[admin@client1] > int w60g monitor wlan60-1
connected: yes
frequency: 64800
remote-address: 04:
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 80
rssi: -62
tx-sector: 29
tx-sector-info: right 0.6 degrees, down 0.2 degrees
distance: 359.63m
[admin@client2] > interface w60g monitor wlan60-1
connected: yes
frequency: 64800
remote-address: 04:
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 80
rssi: -63
tx-sector: 21
tx-sector-info: right 0.6 degrees, down 0.6 degrees
distance: 540.6m
I fully support your opinion.I think it's highest time for Mikrotik to properly illuminate some essential features of his 60 GHz products. To date, we do not know the LHG and WAP60g exact radiation characteristics (even in frequency dependence), which is at least unusual and suggests that radiative patterns will not be so nice, but they should not be secret to users.
Further, I believe that this device would necessarily needed mode "align" which are temporarily turned off all functions counterproductive when setting up the connection (beamforming-center or off, constant TX power, MCS, etc ..). Many of the problems mentioned here are directly related to the incorrect setting of both sides of the link and consequent frustration by degraded climatic conditions (I do not think snow).
I agree in everything.Mikrotik has such a GREAT product with the LHG60G, but details are just too "cheap".
A "LHG-60G-PRO" with weather-proof, professional layout and better align-feature would open the doors to new customers for mikrotik. For short links, LHG-60G-PRO could be as good or better than UBNT AirFiber, etc.
If you have a time please downgrade to 6.42.11 and test again with adjusting tx-powerSome info:
SIde A is slightly badly aligned, but connection is very stable
connected: yes
frequency: 64800
remote-address: 04:D6:AA:AE:C8:11
tx-mcs: 2
tx-phy-rate: 770.0Mbps
signal: 65
rssi: -63
tx-sector: 63
tx-sector-info: right 1.4 degrees, up 1.4 degrees
distance: 2101.63m
tx-packet-error-rate: 0%
connected: yes
frequency: 64800
remote-address: 04:D6:AA:AE:C8:11
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 80
rssi: -61
tx-sector: 63
tx-sector-info: right 1.4 degrees, up 1.4 degrees
distance: 2101.63m
tx-packet-error-rate: 0%
Stril I's with You. I's waiting for JH-LHG from Jirous....
Perhaps, its a better idea to only add a cover and not to change the dish...
To short link for ALU No TX-POWER control... While will be available change this and set properly tx-sector and MCS the link will be extremely stable...Hi!
There are just too many variables and modifying the hardware makes it any harder...
I have a 400m link. With lower frequencies, RSSI ist better than with high frequencies, BUT: MCS is unstable!
58GHz: RSSI=48, MCS is going up and down (on stable weather conditions)
64GHZ: RSSI=54, MCS stable on "8"
BUT: that happens with ALU-dish and LHG...
Perhaps, its a better idea to only add a cover and not to change the dish...
With 6.44 beta61Still need these Chris?What are the commands to set 66000 and add 66000 in the scan list on the client and AP sides?
Mikrotik 60Ghz CLI commands
STA
/interface w60g set wlan60-1 frequency-list=58320,60480,62640,64800,66000
AP
/interface w60g set wlan60-1 frequency=66000
thats veeery good. seems that now somehow option for winter is available.For all those who struggle these days with devices being snowed up - available solution of radome covering for harsh meteo conditions:
https://www.wifihw.cz/default.asp?cls=s ... ng&lngid=1
+1But this is also only plastic, expensive plastic Mikrotik should provide such cover for free: P
+1+1 for channel sizes
100mhz or 200mhz steps will be better, at least 500mhz steps. not all need 1gb in ptp and in PTMP ( 8 online ) for sure
But the regulatory allows it?+1+1 for channel sizes
100mhz or 200mhz steps will be better, at least 500mhz steps. not all need 1gb in ptp and in PTMP ( 8 online ) for sure
Hi Mikrotik, is it possible? channel sizes 500 MHz
Try theseWhen installing the LHG60 dishes I used Ubiquiti TouchCable terminated with Ubiquiti ToughConnectors and using the Ubiquiti surge arrestors. As per instructions this requires a short cable to connect the LHG60 to the surge arrestor. Then the surge arrestor connected to the long run of toughcable and close to source another surge arrestor and another short cable from the surge arrestor to the network switch. Field termination of the toughcable is a royal pain and I would like to minimise it at just the long cable run. Does any body know of a good source of outdoor rated, S/FTP, solid core, patch cords to use?
I've found a company in the US selling toughcable based patch cords terminated with toughconnectors but I am searcing something in Europe and it does not have to be made with Ubiquiti cable as long as the cable use includes a proper drain wire and not just the foil wrap.
Any information highly appreciated.
But both use IEEE 802.11 ad standard correct?No way man, different vendors
SXTsq60 - antenna gain 10-13,5dBi,(depending on channel, lowest gain is on 62GHz), tx power max 363mW / 25,6dBmHi All
I have a question there is an hardware power tx difference from WAP60G and LHG60G?
How did you get this Informations?SXTsq60 - antenna gain 10-13,5dBi,(depending on channel, lowest gain is on 62GHz), tx power max 363mW / 25,6dBmHi All
I have a question there is an hardware power tx difference from WAP60G and LHG60G?
WAP60G - antenna gain 10-13,5dBi (depending on channel, lowest gain is on 62GHz), tx power max 147mW / 21,67dBm
LHG60Lite - antenna gain 42dBi, tx power max 3mW / 4,77dBm
LHG60G - antenna gain 42dBi, tx power max 17mW / 12,3dBm
WAP60G and LHG60G use the same Electronics, the same PCB, all the same.SXTsq60 - antenna gain 10-13,5dBi,(depending on channel, lowest gain is on 62GHz), tx power max 363mW / 25,6dBmHi All
I have a question there is an hardware power tx difference from WAP60G and LHG60G?
WAP60G - antenna gain 10-13,5dBi (depending on channel, lowest gain is on 62GHz), tx power max 147mW / 21,67dBm
LHG60Lite - antenna gain 42dBi, tx power max 3mW / 4,77dBm
LHG60G - antenna gain 42dBi, tx power max 17mW / 12,3dBm
WAP60G and LHG60G use the same Electronics, the same PCB, all the same.SXTsq60 - antenna gain 10-13,5dBi,(depending on channel, lowest gain is on 62GHz), tx power max 363mW / 25,6dBmHi All
I have a question there is an hardware power tx difference from WAP60G and LHG60G?
WAP60G - antenna gain 10-13,5dBi (depending on channel, lowest gain is on 62GHz), tx power max 147mW / 21,67dBm
LHG60Lite - antenna gain 42dBi, tx power max 3mW / 4,77dBm
LHG60G - antenna gain 42dBi, tx power max 17mW / 12,3dBm
if we put PCBA from WAP60G to LHG60G
we will get a range more 6000m
WAP60G TX = 21.67dB+ LHG DISH 42dB = 63.67dB WOW !!!
Doesnt works, max 1521 meters on ros 6.42.1, we had this link on two waps and two alu dishes... LHG60 is much better. If we get beamforming calibration with tx-power settinga we do this after that...In this time, no way man to use it > 1500mWAP60G and LHG60G use the same Electronics, the same PCB, all the same.SXTsq60 - antenna gain 10-13,5dBi,(depending on channel, lowest gain is on 62GHz), tx power max 363mW / 25,6dBmHi All
I have a question there is an hardware power tx difference from WAP60G and LHG60G?
WAP60G - antenna gain 10-13,5dBi (depending on channel, lowest gain is on 62GHz), tx power max 147mW / 21,67dBm
LHG60Lite - antenna gain 42dBi, tx power max 3mW / 4,77dBm
LHG60G - antenna gain 42dBi, tx power max 17mW / 12,3dBm
if we put PCBA from WAP60G to LHG60G
we will get a range more 6000m
WAP60G TX = 21.67dB+ LHG DISH 42dB = 63.67dB WOW !!!
Sure. But it's been said multiple times my mikrotik that these devices are calibrated. So will it work?
Try it and let us know
Did anyone else besides autostoper and djvolt himself tried those alu dishes? Autostoper is having problems with them, and djvolt is telling him that everything should work. Please we need more info from other people. Djvolt, You should have info from Your customers, so please ask them if they can confirm that Your equipment is working. But please, only genuine customers - not some bots.Does anyone use ALU400 DISH fpr LHG60 ?
please REAL INFO, print SCR ...
thank you for replay6.42.11 - stable
STATION
/interface w60g set wlan60-1 frequency-list=58320,60480,62640,64800,66000
AP
/interface w60g set wlan60-1 frequency=66000
what exactly is not stable?All links works stable in heavy snow in Poland, our customers have 400mm and 600mm alu dishes. They use ros 6.42.11, 6.43.8 is not stable...
"auto" does not include 66000MHzthank you for replay
when test it
it put frequency=auto
and no connection ??
what you think about it
hello .....thank's for replaywhat exactly is not stable?All links works stable in heavy snow in Poland, our customers have 400mm and 600mm alu dishes. They use ros 6.42.11, 6.43.8 is not stable..."auto" does not include 66000MHzthank you for replay
when test it
it put frequency=auto
and no connection ??
what you think about it
beamforming during heavy snowfall on auto mode. after reboot once it is rssi -51, once it is -65, and yet there is -70what exactly is not stable?All links works stable in heavy snow in Poland, our customers have 400mm and 600mm alu dishes. They use ros 6.42.11, 6.43.8 is not stable...
frequency-list was renamed to scan-list in one of beta releases.how can fixed it
Signal is fine. is this PtP or PtMP setup? Is latest version used on both sides? Are devices mounted on fixed / stable pole?we try alignment many times but this is best, why rssi not below -49... whats your suggestions for this distance ?
hello antonsb,Signal is fine. is this PtP or PtMP setup? Is latest version used on both sides? Are devices mounted on fixed / stable pole?
thnx djvolt, now I'm going to test it also, distance was not so far that's why I could not think change frequency I believe that for long distance high frequency needed on 60GHzMaybe try 64800
No, I didn't find the option for that frequency. I've heard it is a good option for long distance links. Will 66000 be better in rain?osalom have you tried the 66 GHz channel?
Thanks. I will try different frequencies during rainy season. Lets see what frequencies hold better then.You have to set it from the terminal
client:
/int w60g set scan-list=58320,60480,62640,64800,66000 0
AP.
/int w60g set frequency=66000 0
In short, I realized that the stable version is not very stable and good either.
The question is why it has been renamed and why you will not allow - instead of renaming only - experienced users to set up TX power, MCS, etc manually. You do not like experienced users ?? But that would mean something serious ...frequency-list was renamed to scan-list in one of beta releases.how can fixed it
Thanks for sharing winbox data, show the other side of the link please. Finally, somebody understood that the LHG60 parabolic beam had a harsh beam pattern, and for longer distances it had to slash up to one degree from the axis. In this situation, no automation is able to set the link to a maximum of 1.5km or more, but the installer should know the correct TX-sector (not the center). Mikrotik, please finally post the LHG60 emission diagrams, please!So.... whats the LHG60 PTP distance record so far? I just put one in today that is 1.6 miles! I won't know until springtime how much rain will fade it. It's for a small micropop site we have that will have a 5Ghz UBNT AC fail-over. If this works, I'd like to install several WAP60G AP's to get 1Gb services to the neighborhood, and deploy at other sites.
So far, 2.3Gb capacity and 80 signal, 2521m.
Also it is SNOWING here HEAVY right now, doesn't seem to effect signal by even the slightest.
Anyone have any OID's I can create probes in the dude so I can now graph the PHY rate, RSSI, etc.?
+1
should know the correct TX-sector (not the center). Mikrotik, please finally post the LHG60 emission diagrams, please!