You don't need external radio. 5ghz is implemented in same cpu with 60ghz. So, only feed!Only a 5 ghz feed to use with external radio
Well its just for testing purposes, nothing else. Its not even stable....i was just curious how far can it get. Usable distance with pair of LHGs is about 1800m at 66GHz or 1400m with 64,8GHz. Stable in rain about 50mm/h. But for now we need protective cover for whole LHG because the grid of LHG is nicely holding snow and kills every longer link.Congratulations Gemb! How much time did You spent on aligning? I have another 5130 meters link and didn't want even to try, but Gemb give me something to think about
is better to use frequency: 66000 for long distance ? do you have any experience with your tests ?As You can see, both links are working on 66.000! On the central location. antennas are almost back to back, and it looks like it doesn't bother them I tried shorter link at 64ghz, but connection was not stable. I assume that is misalignment related.
Not exactly true -66GHz is mandatory on 2200+ meters!
so ? I can use 66Ghz for 900m link also for better performance.Not exactly true -66GHz is mandatory on 2200+ meters!
connected: yes
frequency: 64800
remote-address: 04:D6:AA:AF:D3:C6
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 80
rssi: -57
distance: 2409.94m
Great info! I correct myself So, what is maximum theoretical distance for 64800?Not exactly true -66GHz is mandatory on 2200+ meters!
connected: yes
frequency: 64800
remote-address: 04:D6:AA:AF:D3:C6
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 80
rssi: -57
distance: 2409.94m
from our experience, the most important thing is to put a good amount of traffic over the link during the alignment. If you don't, the readings are not updated fast enough. Even in alignment mode.Hello
A colleague tried to install the Wireless Wire Dish kit (RBLHGG-60ADKIT), from mainland to an island. Mounted at 3 and 6 meter height, 700 meter over a lake, clear sight and so forth.
Also tried a different kit, same results. Default configuration, but no connection at all. Kits works without problems if next to each other. (ROS within 6.43.*). Used a couple of hours trying to align them with no success at all.
0.7 km with 60 Ghz should give maximum 0.93 m radius on the freznel zone ?
(Freznel zone calculator / formula).
How accurate must the alignment be for a successfull link to take place?
Other than alignment issues what could the problem be?
I would expect to see contact/link after trying long enough, even just for a short while ?
Next try we'll keep these tips in mind:
- Better mounting kits and/or lasers
- Disable beamforming: /interface w60g set 0 tx-sector=36
- Using CLI alignment (quicker/too quick): /interface w60g align wlan60-1
If You could try downgrade to 6.43rc17 and see if it helps, I stumbled on very similar situation and downgrade to rc17 works like a charm.Hello
Also tried a different kit, same results. Default configuration, but no connection at all. Kits works without problems if next to each other. (ROS within 6.43.*). Used a couple of hours trying to align them with no success at all.
please check if scan-list on "station-bridge" device includes frequencies you are trying to use. Alignment needs to be very precise for connection to be established.Yup also using the latest beta. On two separate links of +-1800m and 2000m cannot even make a single link. Using 64800 and 66000. You would think after aiming for a while there would at least be a connection - a bad one at least.
Upcoming Beta version (will be released today or tomorrow) will include rolling avg of RSSI value - "10s-average-rssi"
- With alignment-mode:
Signal varies A LOT! I wrote a script that averages the RSSIs of the last 10s to be able to see anyhing...
and relasedUpcoming Beta version (will be released today or tomorrow) will include rolling avg of RSSI value - "10s-average-rssi"
+1Wherever I can I use second grounding cable in combination with Schrack outdoor s/ftp cable. Anyhow, for me grounding is a must - regardless what many others are telling.
@ Distance XXX????Does anyone have some experience in the use of LHG 60G with wAP 60G AP ?
Yes. I suppose there will be less gain, perhaps 6dB less, so I could suppose a reduction of 50% in distance, 1500m-> 750m. In 750m there is also less fading, so I could suppose that a link from wAP 60G and one or more LHG 60Gs over 500-800m could work at least the same than a 1500m link composed by two LHG 60Gs. Is it right?@ Distance XXX????Does anyone have some experience in the use of LHG 60G with wAP 60G AP ?
Depends on needs for Link,Yes. I suppose there will be less gain, perhaps 6dB less, so I could suppose a reduction of 50% in distance, 1500m-> 750m. In 750m there is also less fading, so I could suppose that a link from wAP 60G and one or more LHG 60Gs over 500-800m could work at least the same than a 1500m link composed by two LHG 60Gs. Is it right?@ Distance XXX????Does anyone have some experience in the use of LHG 60G with wAP 60G AP ?
So, you divided distances by two? Why? Did you experienced a completely down link during rain over nominal distances (ex 200m wap to wap)? Or did you experienced only a reduction in Throughput? And what about wap to SXTsq lite 60?Depends on needs for Link,Yes. I suppose there will be less gain, perhaps 6dB less, so I could suppose a reduction of 50% in distance, 1500m-> 750m. In 750m there is also less fading, so I could suppose that a link from wAP 60G and one or more LHG 60Gs over 500-800m could work at least the same than a 1500m link composed by two LHG 60Gs. Is it right?@ Distance XXX????Does anyone have some experience in the use of LHG 60G with wAP 60G AP ?
with WAP to WAP wo go to 100m
With WAP to LHG we go to 300m
With LHG to LHG we go to 600m
all this cases without Backup link, we saw no drops in rain with this distances, waiting for some snow.....
I have SXTsq 60 here but not deployed, gain difference to WAP60 is unknown.So, you divided distances by two? Why? Did you experienced a completely down link during rain over nominal distances (ex 200m wap to wap)? Or did you experienced only a reduction in Throughput? And what about wap to SXTsq lite 60?Depends on needs for Link,Yes. I suppose there will be less gain, perhaps 6dB less, so I could suppose a reduction of 50% in distance, 1500m-> 750m. In 750m there is also less fading, so I could suppose that a link from wAP 60G and one or more LHG 60Gs over 500-800m could work at least the same than a 1500m link composed by two LHG 60Gs. Is it right?@ Distance XXX????Does anyone have some experience in the use of LHG 60G with wAP 60G AP ?
with WAP to WAP wo go to 100m
With WAP to LHG we go to 300m
With LHG to LHG we go to 600m
all this cases without Backup link, we saw no drops in rain with this distances, waiting for some snow.....
WAP to WAP will drop every rain /snowThe price in this case is not very important, because the difference is not big. I understand that if you put two directional antenna LHG, then accessibility will have to be 99.9999%
But what will be the availability if you put two WAP or WAP-LHG
Shure it will work, but it drop every rain66000 GHz is working on 4000+. Tested in real life...
We have seen snow is a killer for 60GHz. Even light snow fall killed our 1200m link completely.Shure it will work, but it drop every rain66000 GHz is working on 4000+. Tested in real life...
[admin@lhg60-ap] > int w6 monitor wlan60-1
connected: yes
frequency: 58320
remote-address: 24:18:1D:
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 95
rssi: -55
tx-sector: 1
tx-sector-info: left 1 degrees, down 1.4 degrees
distance: 1167.48m
tx-packet-error-rate: 0%
ok. Whats rain? Range for nice day is ok but bad day?66000 GHz is working on 4000+. Tested in real life...
Please, post printscreen Link LHG 60GHz of real +4000mFor my links, falling snow was not issue at all. Only that sticky snow that got stuck on antenna is causing trouble. And of course that You need 5ghz backup for 60ghz link
Please use search or go to viewtopic.php?f=7&t=133374&sid=47ddbc29 ... 00#p699697Please, post printscreen Link LHG 60GHz of real +4000mFor my links, falling snow was not issue at all. Only that sticky snow that got stuck on antenna is causing trouble. And of course that You need 5ghz backup for 60ghz link
My humbly opinion is that oxygen absorption is an obstacle to build devices with bigger dish. I hope that I am wrong. But there is no obstacle to implement 5ghz backup in same device...
pease Givme your Skype or viber plesaePlease use search or go to viewtopic.php?f=7&t=133374&sid=47ddbc29 ... 00#p699697Please, post printscreen Link LHG 60GHz of real +4000mFor my links, falling snow was not issue at all. Only that sticky snow that got stuck on antenna is causing trouble. And of course that You need 5ghz backup for 60ghz link
BR...
I've heard that Mikrotik has released the new LHG 60 Ghz R2 reviewMy humbly opinion is that oxygen absorption is an obstacle to build devices with bigger dish. I hope that I am wrong. But there is no obstacle to implement 5ghz backup in same device...
Pitaj Jocu da ti da moj broj - ja sam Deki iz firme DDNet...pease Givme your Skype or viber plesaePlease use search or go to viewtopic.php?f=7&t=133374&sid=47ddbc29 ... 00#p699697Please, post printscreen Link LHG 60GHz of real +4000mFor my links, falling snow was not issue at all. Only that sticky snow that got stuck on antenna is causing trouble. And of course that You need 5ghz backup for 60ghz link
BR...
Pitaj Jocu da ti da moj broj - ja sam Deki iz firme DDNet...pease Givme your Skype or viber plesaePlease use search or go to viewtopic.php?f=7&t=133374&sid=47ddbc29 ... 00#p699697Please, post printscreen Link LHG 60GHz of real +4000mFor my links, falling snow was not issue at all. Only that sticky snow that got stuck on antenna is causing trouble. And of course that You need 5ghz backup for 60ghz link
e pa da, pricao mije da tebe da ima odlicna iskustva
063/7320073
kuckamo se tamo na Vieru
BR...
Pitaj Jocu da ti da moj broj - ja sam Deki iz firme DDNet...pease Givme your Skype or viber plesaePlease use search or go to viewtopic.php?f=7&t=133374&sid=47ddbc29 ... 00#p699697
Please, post printscreen Link LHG 60GHz of real +4000m
e pa da, pricao mije da tebe da ima odlicna iskustva
kuckamo se tamo na Vieru
BR...
autostoper76 ?????I've heard that Mikrotik has released the new LHG 60 Ghz R2 review
for range up to 6000m and embedded wifi 5GHZ
Pitaj Jocu da ti da moj broj - ja sam Deki iz firme DDNet...pease Givme your Skype or viber plesaePlease use search or go to viewtopic.php?f=7&t=133374&sid=47ddbc29 ... 00#p699697
Please, post printscreen Link LHG 60GHz of real +4000m
e pa da, pricao mije da tebe da ima odlicna iskustva
kuckamo se tamo na Vieru
BR...
I can't find anything on a new R2 version. Do you have any more information? We run 5GHZ backup paths on every LHG60, but an integrated backup would be so much easier.I've heard that Mikrotik has released the new LHG 60 Ghz R2 review
for range up to 6000m and embedded wifi 5GHZ
Pitaj Jocu da ti da moj broj - ja sam Deki iz firme DDNet...pease Givme your Skype or viber plesaePlease use search or go to viewtopic.php?f=7&t=133374&sid=47ddbc29 ... 00#p699697
Please, post printscreen Link LHG 60GHz of real +4000m
e pa da, pricao mije da tebe da ima odlicna iskustva
kuckamo se tamo na Vieru
BR...
Please, Ask Mikrotik Directly about the more detailsI can't find anything on a new R2 version. Do you have any more information? We run 5GHZ backup paths on every LHG60, but an integrated backup would be so much easier.I've heard that Mikrotik has released the new LHG 60 Ghz R2 review
for range up to 6000m and embedded wifi 5GHZ
@MT take my moneyPlease, Ask Mikrotik Directly about the more detailsI can't find anything on a new R2 version. Do you have any more information? We run 5GHZ backup paths on every LHG60, but an integrated backup would be so much easier.I've heard that Mikrotik has released the new LHG 60 Ghz R2 review
for range up to 6000m and embedded wifi 5GHZ
The new LHG 60GHz R2
Have a distance of about 6,000 metar and More...
MIKROTIK is in the testing phase of the new R2 version
there are people on the forum who know more details
The biggest change is in the antenna - the construction
RX and TX
Resistance to rain, snow ...
prices will be twice as expensive
UBNT take my money (If MTK60G end up like 802.11ac)@MT take my moneyPlease, Ask Mikrotik Directly about the more detailsI can't find anything on a new R2 version. Do you have any more information? We run 5GHZ backup paths on every LHG60, but an integrated backup would be so much easier.I've heard that Mikrotik has released the new LHG 60 Ghz R2 review
for range up to 6000m and embedded wifi 5GHZ
The new LHG 60GHz R2
Have a distance of about 6,000 metar and More...
MIKROTIK is in the testing phase of the new R2 version
there are people on the forum who know more details
The biggest change is in the antenna - the construction
RX and TX
Resistance to rain, snow ...
prices will be twice as expensive
support up to 6,000 meter !!!So Mikrotik is making an "R2" (release 2?) version of the LHG-60 dish that will support up to 4,000 meter (2.5 mile)? Complete new design on dish, that allows higher gain and harder to align?
UBNT gets *nothing* finished these days. LHG60 works great.UBNT take my money (If MTK60G end up like 802.11ac)@MT take my moneyPlease, Ask Mikrotik Directly about the more detailsI can't find anything on a new R2 version. Do you have any more information? We run 5GHZ backup paths on every LHG60, but an integrated backup would be so much easier.I've heard that Mikrotik has released the new LHG 60 Ghz R2 review
for range up to 6000m and embedded wifi 5GHZ
The new LHG 60GHz R2
Have a distance of about 6,000 metar and More...
MIKROTIK is in the testing phase of the new R2 version
there are people on the forum who know more details
The biggest change is in the antenna - the construction
RX and TX
Resistance to rain, snow ...
prices will be twice as expensive
I wonder if its only backup failover, or you can agregate 2 links 60+5ghz at the same time for bigger throughput along for instant failover.Yes LHG60 is great hardware with improved distance and 5 GHZ backup it 'll be a must for 2019 wating for more info
what do you expect more if you bond 5ghz+60ghz? anyway there is 1gbps ethernet port, i dont get your idea (:
my point, just to get ANY connection during bad weather, okay let it be at least 100mbps for snow fall or heavy rain, so the customers would not fuck up to red our phones
What if you go a bit out of range or a little bad weather hits and u dont have 1gb anymore, like have 800mbit, 5ghz would push that 200mbit back giving you full 1gbs again, doesnt matter if u go over 1gbs combined 60+5ghz during ideal conditions which would saturate your gigabit ethernt port, its about quality of service and failover.what do you expect more if you bond 5ghz+60ghz? anyway there is 1gbps ethernet port, i dont get your idea (:
my point, just to get ANY connection during bad weather, okay let it be at least 100mbps for snow fall or heavy rain, so the customers would not fuck up to red our phones
WOW, this looks great. Much cheaper then the solution from Poland. I can't wait to try itI see everybody suggesting a specific 3rd party precision alignment mount but nobody suggested the Mikrotik solidMount
https://mikrotik.com/product/solidmount
It does look proper for the job and it is actually half price from the 3rd party one. Has anybody got any experience with it? Is it any good?
I waiting to get it....I see everybody suggesting a specific 3rd party precision alignment mount but nobody suggested the Mikrotik solidMount
https://mikrotik.com/product/solidmount
It does look proper for the job and it is actually half price from the 3rd party one. Has anybody got any experience with it? Is it any good?
No problem for the short one use a WAG60+WAG60, for the middle two use WAG60+LHG60 and for the last 2 use LHG60+LHG60
if the 5 links are on the same tower remember that 64800 MHz overlaps partially 66000 MHz so you have to separate LHGs in angle and distance.
Use higher channel for longer links
Hi, we have 3 different installations,I have 5 different PtP links that I would like to upgrade to 60GHz.
The distances are:
40m
160m
185m
460m
1280m
There is never any snow and heavy rains are rear. I was planning to use LHG60 wireless wire dish for all of them but somebody suggested that the dish would not be good for the 40m link and that I should possibly use the wAP60G for the short links.
.................
Dear DJ Volt,..
Forget about the 5GHz backup in the same device Our solution will be with 2 x RPSMA
Hi, we have 3 different installations,I have 5 different PtP links that I would like to upgrade to 60GHz.
The distances are:
40m
160m
185m
460m
1280m
There is never any snow and heavy rains are rear. I was planning to use LHG60 wireless wire dish for all of them but somebody suggested that the dish would not be good for the 40m link and that I should possibly use the wAP60G for the short links.
.................
Fisrt- 1.183 mtrs. above 60 percent of signal where both sites are visible each other.
Second- 806 mtrs same conditions before, no more 80% of signal
Third- 679 mtrs same as before 80% of signal.
The best speed in TCP is 500Mb upload and donload in send/recive mode, with 80%, in 60% we are talking about 150 Mb in both directions at same time.
But we have a problem, at first group, with default configuration, and both 60G connected, do not ping response
What do I have to do for repair this? Please help me.
Thanks
PD: We speak Spanish too
BTest or iperf? On that distances you must have 940/940Mbps TCP/IP... BTest use only one core!!!!!!Hi, we have 3 different installations,
Fisrt- 1.183 mtrs. above 60 percent of signal where both sites are visible each other.
Second- 806 mtrs same conditions before, no more 80% of signal
Third- 679 mtrs same as before 80% of signal.
The best speed in TCP is 500Mb upload and donload in send/recive mode, with 80%, in 60% we are talking about 150 Mb in both directions at same time.
But we have a problem, at first group, with default configuration, and both 60G connected, do not ping response
What do I have to do for repair this? Please help me.
Thanks
PD: We speak Spanish too
I do it again todayCan you read at all my posts?????
Frequency: 64800, I write to you that YOU MUST CHANGE 66000 to 64800 on that distance on ALU dishes !!!!
ALU 400 works extremely great on 64800 up to 1500meters
So you are in wrong and you make the basic mistakes my friend
DJ voltCan you read at all my posts?????
Frequency: 64800, I write to you that YOU MUST CHANGE 66000 to 64800 on that distance on ALU dishes !!!!
ALU 400 works extremely great on 64800 up to 1500meters
So you are in wrong and you make the basic mistakes my friend
Finally some wise wordsYou can't just make a random aluminum dish and expect it to be better just because of material. There are calibrations done, specifically for the original grid. Antenna design is a precise science, not a form of metallurgy.
Indeed. Especially remember that the higher the frequency (hence, the shorter the wavelength) the most precision needed.You can't just make a random aluminum dish and expect it to be better just because of material. There are calibrations done, specifically for the original grid. Antenna design is a precise science, not a form of metallurgy.
Best is to use the heat of the radio/board itself. We see problems with snow on the longer links even if it does not hang to the antenna. Seems to have more influence on 60GHz than rain.Indeed. Especially remember that the higher the frequency (hence, the shorter the wavelength) the most precision needed.You can't just make a random aluminum dish and expect it to be better just because of material. There are calibrations done, specifically for the original grid. Antenna design is a precise science, not a form of metallurgy.
The only solution I imagine for the ice problems is heating and/or some water repellent treatment. There are specific PTFE based sprays for that. Or maybe something like silicone based lubricant.
I'm waiting for some snow here to try but in 50 years I've seen less than 5 serious snow events.
Yes, problematic with the LHG though, I doubt the dish gets warm enogh.Best is to use the heat of the radio/board itself. We see problems with snow on the longer links even if it does not hang to the antenna. Seems to have more influence on 60GHz than rain.
Still connected? Signal 40 and 700meters is still connected??? Where is 1500 meters???LEDs in your picture show that it's still connected
Eh Normis, I understand your frustration, but our product does not criticize your product, our product helps in the sale of your product like LHG60 etcI understand that selling your product kind of relies on you criticizing the original product, but this is getting ridiculous. Please stop.
Hello aismeI did a quick test link today between LHG60s and distance 167m. The link came up and was connected but I assume it needed further adjustment because the values were all low: MCS 3 and phy-rate 923mbps. RSSI -65.
The frequency was at 58Ghz and just for testing I changed it to 66000 manually on both sides. The link immediately dropped and never came back.
Does anybody know why the link disconnected because of the frequency change?
Hi Dear Normis,I understand that selling your product kind of relies on you criticizing the original product, but this is getting ridiculous. Please stop.
Please.Eh Normis, I understand your frustration, but our product does not criticize your product, our product helps in the sale of your product like LHG60 etcI understand that selling your product kind of relies on you criticizing the original product, but this is getting ridiculous. Please stop.
We have only upgrades for your products that improves your products, not whole products...
Like Mercedes and AMG, AMG helps to sell Mercedes so LHG60 is Mercedes but AMG is Alu Dish + Front Cover + feeder + electronic from whole LHG60, thats all
Instead of helping us, you will still be angry :{
Like in AC on arm so NEVER I think better solution will be IgniteNet with Alu Dishes, no problem to transfer 2,5GHi Dear Normis,I understand that selling your product kind of relies on you criticizing the original product, but this is getting ridiculous. Please stop.
when will the new Wireless Link 60ghz ? or 24 GHz or 80 GHz
Yes of course: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_cont ... 8On7sLnv_kPlease.
Is there any test of Alu400 ?
What are your experiences?
ALU400 vs Original 60GHz
To be honest, I thought about it, and at the time of writing the post I translated it for 66000 so far. We'll see / observeMaybe check 66G or downgrade to 6.42.11
I've found out that a small amount of radioactivity is more effective. I am testing by fixing a piece of Tungsten-Thorium welding electrode. The beta particles emitted by the decay from Ra-228 to Ac-228 seem to help repel the water molecules from sticking to the surface.Now we project the heater for our alu dishes, alu dish will be always warm <15 degree I think will be 24V, on the back will be waterproof gland with LAN port like in alu dishes Gen2
/interface w60g monitor 0
connected: yes
frequency: 64800
remote-address: 24:18:1D:63:62:56
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 85
rssi: -53
tx-sector: 36
tx-sector-info: center
distance: 395.18m
tx-packet-error-rate: 0%
This is only 400meters, the power is to strange with alu dishes, without limit the power this link I think will be unstable. Please set beamforming to 36, if doesnt help please downgrade to last stable version like 6.42.11 and set tx-power to 5Update for ALU vs LHG dish:
The ALU dish has a strange behaviour: RSSI is good, Signal ist good, but MCS is unstable!
With LHG-dish, i see a stable MCS of 8 (PHY Rate: 2.3 Gbps). With the upgrade-kit, MCS goes up and down from 4 to 8.
Do you have any other idea, to make the LHG "snow-proof"?
[admin@client1] > int w60g monitor wlan60-1
connected: yes
frequency: 64800
remote-address: 04:
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 80
rssi: -62
tx-sector: 29
tx-sector-info: right 0.6 degrees, down 0.2 degrees
distance: 359.63m
[admin@client2] > interface w60g monitor wlan60-1
connected: yes
frequency: 64800
remote-address: 04:
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 80
rssi: -63
tx-sector: 21
tx-sector-info: right 0.6 degrees, down 0.6 degrees
distance: 540.6m
I fully support your opinion.I think it's highest time for Mikrotik to properly illuminate some essential features of his 60 GHz products. To date, we do not know the LHG and WAP60g exact radiation characteristics (even in frequency dependence), which is at least unusual and suggests that radiative patterns will not be so nice, but they should not be secret to users.
Further, I believe that this device would necessarily needed mode "align" which are temporarily turned off all functions counterproductive when setting up the connection (beamforming-center or off, constant TX power, MCS, etc ..). Many of the problems mentioned here are directly related to the incorrect setting of both sides of the link and consequent frustration by degraded climatic conditions (I do not think snow).
I agree in everything.Mikrotik has such a GREAT product with the LHG60G, but details are just too "cheap".
A "LHG-60G-PRO" with weather-proof, professional layout and better align-feature would open the doors to new customers for mikrotik. For short links, LHG-60G-PRO could be as good or better than UBNT AirFiber, etc.
If you have a time please downgrade to 6.42.11 and test again with adjusting tx-powerSome info:
SIde A is slightly badly aligned, but connection is very stable
connected: yes
frequency: 64800
remote-address: 04:D6:AA:AE:C8:11
tx-mcs: 2
tx-phy-rate: 770.0Mbps
signal: 65
rssi: -63
tx-sector: 63
tx-sector-info: right 1.4 degrees, up 1.4 degrees
distance: 2101.63m
tx-packet-error-rate: 0%
connected: yes
frequency: 64800
remote-address: 04:D6:AA:AE:C8:11
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 80
rssi: -61
tx-sector: 63
tx-sector-info: right 1.4 degrees, up 1.4 degrees
distance: 2101.63m
tx-packet-error-rate: 0%
Stril I's with You. I's waiting for JH-LHG from Jirous....
Perhaps, its a better idea to only add a cover and not to change the dish...
To short link for ALU No TX-POWER control... While will be available change this and set properly tx-sector and MCS the link will be extremely stable...Hi!
There are just too many variables and modifying the hardware makes it any harder...
I have a 400m link. With lower frequencies, RSSI ist better than with high frequencies, BUT: MCS is unstable!
58GHz: RSSI=48, MCS is going up and down (on stable weather conditions)
64GHZ: RSSI=54, MCS stable on "8"
BUT: that happens with ALU-dish and LHG...
Perhaps, its a better idea to only add a cover and not to change the dish...
With 6.44 beta61Still need these Chris?What are the commands to set 66000 and add 66000 in the scan list on the client and AP sides?
Mikrotik 60Ghz CLI commands
STA
/interface w60g set wlan60-1 frequency-list=58320,60480,62640,64800,66000
AP
/interface w60g set wlan60-1 frequency=66000
thats veeery good. seems that now somehow option for winter is available.For all those who struggle these days with devices being snowed up - available solution of radome covering for harsh meteo conditions:
https://www.wifihw.cz/default.asp?cls=s ... ng&lngid=1
+1But this is also only plastic, expensive plastic Mikrotik should provide such cover for free: P
+1+1 for channel sizes
100mhz or 200mhz steps will be better, at least 500mhz steps. not all need 1gb in ptp and in PTMP ( 8 online ) for sure
But the regulatory allows it?+1+1 for channel sizes
100mhz or 200mhz steps will be better, at least 500mhz steps. not all need 1gb in ptp and in PTMP ( 8 online ) for sure
Hi Mikrotik, is it possible? channel sizes 500 MHz
Try theseWhen installing the LHG60 dishes I used Ubiquiti TouchCable terminated with Ubiquiti ToughConnectors and using the Ubiquiti surge arrestors. As per instructions this requires a short cable to connect the LHG60 to the surge arrestor. Then the surge arrestor connected to the long run of toughcable and close to source another surge arrestor and another short cable from the surge arrestor to the network switch. Field termination of the toughcable is a royal pain and I would like to minimise it at just the long cable run. Does any body know of a good source of outdoor rated, S/FTP, solid core, patch cords to use?
I've found a company in the US selling toughcable based patch cords terminated with toughconnectors but I am searcing something in Europe and it does not have to be made with Ubiquiti cable as long as the cable use includes a proper drain wire and not just the foil wrap.
Any information highly appreciated.
But both use IEEE 802.11 ad standard correct?No way man, different vendors
SXTsq60 - antenna gain 10-13,5dBi,(depending on channel, lowest gain is on 62GHz), tx power max 363mW / 25,6dBmHi All
I have a question there is an hardware power tx difference from WAP60G and LHG60G?
How did you get this Informations?SXTsq60 - antenna gain 10-13,5dBi,(depending on channel, lowest gain is on 62GHz), tx power max 363mW / 25,6dBmHi All
I have a question there is an hardware power tx difference from WAP60G and LHG60G?
WAP60G - antenna gain 10-13,5dBi (depending on channel, lowest gain is on 62GHz), tx power max 147mW / 21,67dBm
LHG60Lite - antenna gain 42dBi, tx power max 3mW / 4,77dBm
LHG60G - antenna gain 42dBi, tx power max 17mW / 12,3dBm
WAP60G and LHG60G use the same Electronics, the same PCB, all the same.SXTsq60 - antenna gain 10-13,5dBi,(depending on channel, lowest gain is on 62GHz), tx power max 363mW / 25,6dBmHi All
I have a question there is an hardware power tx difference from WAP60G and LHG60G?
WAP60G - antenna gain 10-13,5dBi (depending on channel, lowest gain is on 62GHz), tx power max 147mW / 21,67dBm
LHG60Lite - antenna gain 42dBi, tx power max 3mW / 4,77dBm
LHG60G - antenna gain 42dBi, tx power max 17mW / 12,3dBm
WAP60G and LHG60G use the same Electronics, the same PCB, all the same.SXTsq60 - antenna gain 10-13,5dBi,(depending on channel, lowest gain is on 62GHz), tx power max 363mW / 25,6dBmHi All
I have a question there is an hardware power tx difference from WAP60G and LHG60G?
WAP60G - antenna gain 10-13,5dBi (depending on channel, lowest gain is on 62GHz), tx power max 147mW / 21,67dBm
LHG60Lite - antenna gain 42dBi, tx power max 3mW / 4,77dBm
LHG60G - antenna gain 42dBi, tx power max 17mW / 12,3dBm
if we put PCBA from WAP60G to LHG60G
we will get a range more 6000m
WAP60G TX = 21.67dB+ LHG DISH 42dB = 63.67dB WOW !!!
Doesnt works, max 1521 meters on ros 6.42.1, we had this link on two waps and two alu dishes... LHG60 is much better. If we get beamforming calibration with tx-power settinga we do this after that...In this time, no way man to use it > 1500mWAP60G and LHG60G use the same Electronics, the same PCB, all the same.SXTsq60 - antenna gain 10-13,5dBi,(depending on channel, lowest gain is on 62GHz), tx power max 363mW / 25,6dBmHi All
I have a question there is an hardware power tx difference from WAP60G and LHG60G?
WAP60G - antenna gain 10-13,5dBi (depending on channel, lowest gain is on 62GHz), tx power max 147mW / 21,67dBm
LHG60Lite - antenna gain 42dBi, tx power max 3mW / 4,77dBm
LHG60G - antenna gain 42dBi, tx power max 17mW / 12,3dBm
if we put PCBA from WAP60G to LHG60G
we will get a range more 6000m
WAP60G TX = 21.67dB+ LHG DISH 42dB = 63.67dB WOW !!!
Sure. But it's been said multiple times my mikrotik that these devices are calibrated. So will it work?
Try it and let us know
Did anyone else besides autostoper and djvolt himself tried those alu dishes? Autostoper is having problems with them, and djvolt is telling him that everything should work. Please we need more info from other people. Djvolt, You should have info from Your customers, so please ask them if they can confirm that Your equipment is working. But please, only genuine customers - not some bots.Does anyone use ALU400 DISH fpr LHG60 ?
please REAL INFO, print SCR ...
thank you for replay6.42.11 - stable
STATION
/interface w60g set wlan60-1 frequency-list=58320,60480,62640,64800,66000
AP
/interface w60g set wlan60-1 frequency=66000
what exactly is not stable?All links works stable in heavy snow in Poland, our customers have 400mm and 600mm alu dishes. They use ros 6.42.11, 6.43.8 is not stable...
"auto" does not include 66000MHzthank you for replay
when test it
it put frequency=auto
and no connection ??
what you think about it
hello .....thank's for replaywhat exactly is not stable?All links works stable in heavy snow in Poland, our customers have 400mm and 600mm alu dishes. They use ros 6.42.11, 6.43.8 is not stable..."auto" does not include 66000MHzthank you for replay
when test it
it put frequency=auto
and no connection ??
what you think about it
beamforming during heavy snowfall on auto mode. after reboot once it is rssi -51, once it is -65, and yet there is -70what exactly is not stable?All links works stable in heavy snow in Poland, our customers have 400mm and 600mm alu dishes. They use ros 6.42.11, 6.43.8 is not stable...
frequency-list was renamed to scan-list in one of beta releases.how can fixed it
Signal is fine. is this PtP or PtMP setup? Is latest version used on both sides? Are devices mounted on fixed / stable pole?we try alignment many times but this is best, why rssi not below -49... whats your suggestions for this distance ?
hello antonsb,Signal is fine. is this PtP or PtMP setup? Is latest version used on both sides? Are devices mounted on fixed / stable pole?
thnx djvolt, now I'm going to test it also, distance was not so far that's why I could not think change frequency I believe that for long distance high frequency needed on 60GHzMaybe try 64800
No, I didn't find the option for that frequency. I've heard it is a good option for long distance links. Will 66000 be better in rain?osalom have you tried the 66 GHz channel?
Thanks. I will try different frequencies during rainy season. Lets see what frequencies hold better then.You have to set it from the terminal
client:
/int w60g set scan-list=58320,60480,62640,64800,66000 0
AP.
/int w60g set frequency=66000 0
In short, I realized that the stable version is not very stable and good either.
The question is why it has been renamed and why you will not allow - instead of renaming only - experienced users to set up TX power, MCS, etc manually. You do not like experienced users ?? But that would mean something serious ...frequency-list was renamed to scan-list in one of beta releases.how can fixed it
Thanks for sharing winbox data, show the other side of the link please. Finally, somebody understood that the LHG60 parabolic beam had a harsh beam pattern, and for longer distances it had to slash up to one degree from the axis. In this situation, no automation is able to set the link to a maximum of 1.5km or more, but the installer should know the correct TX-sector (not the center). Mikrotik, please finally post the LHG60 emission diagrams, please!So.... whats the LHG60 PTP distance record so far? I just put one in today that is 1.6 miles! I won't know until springtime how much rain will fade it. It's for a small micropop site we have that will have a 5Ghz UBNT AC fail-over. If this works, I'd like to install several WAP60G AP's to get 1Gb services to the neighborhood, and deploy at other sites.
So far, 2.3Gb capacity and 80 signal, 2521m.
Also it is SNOWING here HEAVY right now, doesn't seem to effect signal by even the slightest.
Anyone have any OID's I can create probes in the dude so I can now graph the PHY rate, RSSI, etc.?
+1
should know the correct TX-sector (not the center). Mikrotik, please finally post the LHG60 emission diagrams, please!
is it possible to update Ap and one station a time, via wireless link?All latest firmwares 'd solve the disconnection issue
Solid mount is way way way better for 60G! I had a problem with quickmount when winter came. It was fastened during the summer, and in the winter couple of LHG's was pointing to the ground! Plastic shrink in winter, and screws got loose. Since I have solidmounts for 60G, I used it's mounts (now called and sold as LHG mount https://mikrotik.com/product/lhg_mount) to fix those loose LHG.Has anyone compared these two mounts both by Mikrotik?
https://mikrotik.com/product/solidmount
and
https://i.mt.lv/cdn/rb_files/quickMount ... 113333.pdf
The bottom model for LHG.
SolidMount is great product and way cheaper then Your product. Also, me and other people are waiting info from Your customers about performance of You Alu dishes for LHG60. For now we only have unchecked info from You, and very bad info's from guys in forum...This is slightly better, because is more stable, two U-bolts and bigger flat surface... http://24.multimediahd.pl/en/60ghz/110- ... r-alu.html
Buy and try itself like other productsSolidMount is great product and way cheaper then Your product. Also, me and other people are waiting info from Your customers about performance of You Alu dishes for LHG60. For now we only have unchecked info from You, and very bad info's from guys in forum...This is slightly better, because is more stable, two U-bolts and bigger flat surface... http://24.multimediahd.pl/en/60ghz/110- ... r-alu.html
autostoper76 is using those and he is not happy Untill now, we don;t have any proof that those devices are working OK. Just words - no pictures/viideos
Does anyone use ALU 400?
........Hi,
Earlier today a network loop was introduced in our internal network. While investigating the source of the loop we disconnected the 4 links with other buildings that we have using LHG60s and a link with wAP60. While rebooting one of the LHG60 links the devices never really came back.
I thought it had to do with the network loop and did not pay attention. When the loop was discovered and elliminated (someone connected two adjacent network sockets by mistake) all links and devices came immediately back and I could access their interface except from a specific link.
When I try to ping their IP I get a couple of pings and then maybe 10-15 requests timed out and the same things repeats. At the beginning I thought that maybe one of the antennas has died but the strange thing is that BOTH master and slave behave the same way.
Even when pinging the devices from their respective side the same thing happens which leads me to suspect that something else is the underlying cause.
When checking the LED lights on the devices the pattern is equally strange. Upon rebooting the power LED switches on and then the ethernet LED switches on and blinks as expected however as soon as the wireless link is apparently established and the wifi LED is on then the ethernet LED starts blinking really slow instead of the typical fast rate blinking when traffic is going through.
Any suggestions? Or should I RMA them and replace them? I bought these like 6 weeks ago.
Yes and they do it right from the beginning, integrated 5 GHz Backup....Bad news for mikrotik
60ghz.png
please original link ???Bad news for mikrotik
60ghz.png
This is early access shop, you need to be registered and allowed to see thisplease original link ???Bad news for mikrotik
60ghz.png
i am registeredThis is early access shop, you need to be registered and allowed to see thisplease original link ???Bad news for mikrotik
60ghz.png
Hi,
Earlier today a network loop was introduced in our internal network. While investigating the source of the loop we disconnected the 4 links with other buildings that we have using LHG60s and a link with wAP60. While rebooting one of the LHG60 links the devices never really came back.
I thought it had to do with the network loop and did not pay attention. When the loop was discovered and elliminated (someone connected two adjacent network sockets by mistake) all links and devices came immediately back and I could access their interface except from a specific link.
When I try to ping their IP I get a couple of pings and then maybe 10-15 requests timed out and the same things repeats. At the beginning I thought that maybe one of the antennas has died but the strange thing is that BOTH master and slave behave the same way.
Even when pinging the devices from their respective side the same thing happens which leads me to suspect that something else is the underlying cause.
When checking the LED lights on the devices the pattern is equally strange. Upon rebooting the power LED switches on and then the ethernet LED switches on and blinks as expected however as soon as the wireless link is apparently established and the wifi LED is on then the ethernet LED starts blinking really slow instead of the typical fast rate blinking when traffic is going through.
Any suggestions? Or should I RMA them and replace them? I bought these like 6 weeks ago.
This Device only needs 2-3w if this is RF Tower it could be induction to your cables, or different earth potentialI am reporting some weird findings. The device is connected on an HP A5500 48port PoE+ switch worth 7,000+ euros. There are 3 other LHG60 on the same switch all working properly/normally. There are 35 VoIP phones on the same switch all working properly.
Even when switching off the PoE power from the switch port the antenna stays on! Or at least its LEDs are on.
It will only go off when disconnecting the ground cable!
The weird findings continue. When disconnecting the ground cable the problematic antenna comes back to life and the link works. When connecting back the ground cable it goes crazy again.
The same ground is used for all the other 4 LHG60s on that roof and the rest behave/work normally.
Should I use the ground or not? Is it better to use the Ubiquiti surge arrestors instead of the ground? Should I use both?
I had people check the earthing itself and it is fine.
I could not find documentation on the matter
Hi,
Earlier today a network loop was introduced in our internal network. While investigating the source of the loop we disconnected the 4 links with other buildings that we have using LHG60s and a link with wAP60. While rebooting one of the LHG60 links the devices never really came back.
I thought it had to do with the network loop and did not pay attention. When the loop was discovered and elliminated (someone connected two adjacent network sockets by mistake) all links and devices came immediately back and I could access their interface except from a specific link.
When I try to ping their IP I get a couple of pings and then maybe 10-15 requests timed out and the same things repeats. At the beginning I thought that maybe one of the antennas has died but the strange thing is that BOTH master and slave behave the same way.
Even when pinging the devices from their respective side the same thing happens which leads me to suspect that something else is the underlying cause.
When checking the LED lights on the devices the pattern is equally strange. Upon rebooting the power LED switches on and then the ethernet LED switches on and blinks as expected however as soon as the wireless link is apparently established and the wifi LED is on then the ethernet LED starts blinking really slow instead of the typical fast rate blinking when traffic is going through.
Any suggestions? Or should I RMA them and replace them? I bought these like 6 weeks ago.
Why?Mikrotik is wasting 18 months of advantage on 60 GHZ, is it possible to know if there is any hardware with 5 ghz backup in the close future?
LHG60 is great and available (for a while now). It runs ROS which is way better than AirOS. So wrong thread to blame them sleeping. This new gear looks very small. So I guess gain is between WAP 60G and LHG60G. If you need 5GHz Backup use SXT or combine LHG60G with af5xhd using a powerbox pro.Why?Mikrotik is wasting 18 months of advantage on 60 GHZ, is it possible to know if there is any hardware with 5 ghz backup in the close future?
UBNT will deliver such product, and there would be an AP as well, so why ask them here thinks that they now from the beginning of there
60 GHz Productlinie.
Again, Mikrotik Wireless is dead end, they are sleeping!
Client side is 3 times hardware and a lot of configuration.... for the backhauling is the double and the colocation on the tower is not for freeLHG60 is great and available (for a while now). It runs ROS which is way better than AirOS. So wrong thread to blame them sleeping. This new gear looks very small. So I guess gain is between WAP 60G and LHG60G. If you need 5GHz Backup use SXT or combine LHG60G with af5xhd using a powerbox pro.
Doing backhaul + backup with one Antenna in one direction is not a good idea anyway.Client side is 3 times hardware and a lot of configuration.... for the backhauling is the double and the colocation on the tower is not for freeLHG60 is great and available (for a while now). It runs ROS which is way better than AirOS. So wrong thread to blame them sleeping. This new gear looks very small. So I guess gain is between WAP 60G and LHG60G. If you need 5GHz Backup use SXT or combine LHG60G with af5xhd using a powerbox pro.
Mostly it's rain backup... OK I 'll wait for ubiquitiDoing backhaul + backup with one Antenna in one direction is not a good idea anyway.
May take a while ...Mostly it's rain backup... OK I 'll wait for ubiquitiDoing backhaul + backup with one Antenna in one direction is not a good idea anyway.
There is more stuff on the road. MT announced to do Terragraph. This is a 60GHz Mesh solution and I guess it will be 802.11ay.On 60GHz WAP radio PCB, there is place for 5GHz radio chips, but it was never used. Mikrotik appears to be just sleeping, while competition is creeping closer and closer and may beat them at their own 60GHz game...
Hopefully this will be a wakeup call and we will see some new 60GHz gear soon. They must have known about Ubiquity releasing their 60GHz solution for some time.
Next months will tell us more.
- if we see new 60GHz radios with real new features and improvements, there is still hope MIkrotik R&D have been actually doing something for past months. Question is how long it will take to get new devices certified and released to the market
- if no new devices are announced or they just release minor updated version (let's make a dish metal and call it a day...) it's probably not very good sign. At that point all that Mikrotik can do is they can start lowering the prices of existing 60GHz gear when Ubiquity releases their 60GHz hardware, but that would mean they have nothing new and all they can do is to lower prices to stay in the game... not good.
The range will depend on the used antennas. PTP links will be part of the mesh. I hope different Vendors will be compatible as Radwin and Cambium has announced terragraph, too.While Terragraph sounds interesting, it certainly can't replace P2P links (whitepaper says range is about 250m, using small antennas).
NO NO NO, autostoper have 400mm, NOT 600mm and please DO NOT put people in the wrong place ok?....autostoper76 is using those and he is not happy Untill now, we don;t have any proof that those devices are working OK. Just words - no pictures/viideos
I understand however this is just the roof of the building without any RF tower on it. All the cables going up to the roof are 35-40m Ubiquiti Touch cable. 4 LHG60s doing PTP links. All connected to the same ground. All working fine except this oneThis Device only needs 2-3w if this is RF Tower it could be induction to your cables, or different earth potential
You need to point very well, and the money for solid mount is a good investment,Hej guys, I have 750m PTP link to do and three small 230V wires by the road between these two points. Is it ok to use LHG60 kit ? I don't need 1Gbps throughput, 300Mbps will be ok. What about rain and snow, I want to sleep well
Snow is a problem. Expect to get problems in winter. Do a 5GHz Backup.Hej guys, I have 750m PTP link to do and three small 230V wires by the road between these two points. Is it ok to use LHG60 kit ? I don't need 1Gbps throughput, 300Mbps will be ok. What about rain and snow, I want to sleep well
Yes. Do a plain bridge and do no tagging then all packets go through.Hi!
Can you give me a hint on how to transfer ALL vlans through a LHG-Link? Do I have to configure the VLANs, or is it enough to leave "VLAN Filtering" disabled on the bridge?
Thank you for your help!
Thank you!Yes. Do a plain bridge and do no tagging then all packets go through.Can you give me a hint on how to transfer ALL vlans through a LHG-Link? Do I have to configure the VLANs, or is it enough to leave "VLAN Filtering" disabled on the bridge?
I'm not quite sure about the full compatibility between LHG and WAP60g. WAP60g seems to have some internal distance limit between clients, which Mikrotik is gradually and secretly extending, without any informations for the users who purchased the device. All we have to do is to firmly believe that Mikrotik (before the competition comes up with something better) quickly releases the FW, which again allows (at least for the initial setup of the link) fixed settings not only for TX-sector, but also for TX power, MCS, ACK, etc .All Mikrotik 60G hardware is so far compatible, so you can mix LHGs and WAPs as you like. But don't expect it to work with other vendors, even if it uses common 802.11ad platform. Everyone is playing on it's own playground, there is no intercompatibility due to customized protocols and different vendors design devices to lock you in on their platform to buy their devices... nothing new.
The smart vendor includes compatibility with other vendors equipment when possible, kinda like how Russian rifles were designed to use Russian bullets but also NATO bullets.All Mikrotik 60G hardware is so far compatible, so you can mix LHGs and WAPs as you like. But don't expect it to work with other vendors, even if it uses common 802.11ad platform. Everyone is playing on it's own playground, there is no intercompatibility due to customized protocols and different vendors design devices to lock you in on their platform to buy their devices... nothing new.
guys please. Vanilla 802.11ad is just like vanilla 802.11b or n.The smart vendor includes compatibility with other vendors equipment when possible, kinda like how Russian rifles were designed to use Russian bullets but also NATO bullets.All Mikrotik 60G hardware is so far compatible, so you can mix LHGs and WAPs as you like. But don't expect it to work with other vendors, even if it uses common 802.11ad platform. Everyone is playing on it's own playground, there is no intercompatibility due to customized protocols and different vendors design devices to lock you in on their platform to buy their devices... nothing new.
So smart!!
this error rate is way too high. also notice that the AP side uses lower modulation scheme (7 vs .tx-packet-error-rate: 12%
|( - - - - - )|( - - - - - )|
| | |
| | |
Hello ,Colleagues, tell me, there is a line at 1,500 m., We were reducing antennas, but I noticed that after 30 minutes, the indicators just hang in one place and do not move, it only helps to reboot the devices or to tear the radio link.
I understand that the question will sound silly, but even so, I will ask it.Hello ,Colleagues, tell me, there is a line at 1,500 m., We were reducing antennas, but I noticed that after 30 minutes, the indicators just hang in one place and do not move, it only helps to reboot the devices or to tear the radio link.
I' don't know what's the probs, but you need better aiming.
brasileottanta
RBLHGG-60adkit
fell from a height of 10 meters to the ground and never broke but
When connected to electricity
only power led it works (PWR led on)
but all another led not work (ETH ,USR , Wireless ,align left right ............)
i try to connect it to my computer
The computer has never seen the network cable
What is the problem and what is the solution ?????
You have a solution to this problemHi,
We had the same problem.(without fell down) RMA..
RBLHGG-60adkit
fell from a height of 10 meters to the ground and never broke but
When connected to electricity
only power led it works (PWR led on)
but all another led not work (ETH ,USR , Wireless ,align left right ............)
i try to connect it to my computer
The computer has never seen the network cable
What is the problem and what is the solution ?????
You have a solution to this problemHi,
We had the same problem.(without fell down) RMA..
RBLHGG-60adkit
fell from a height of 10 meters to the ground and never broke but
When connected to electricity
only power led it works (PWR led on)
but all another led not work (ETH ,USR , Wireless ,align left right ............)
i try to connect it to my computer
The computer has never seen the network cable
What is the problem and what is the solution ?????
What do you suggest
Ah, I'm experiencing exactly the same! I had this with my first link (500 meters) and spent a lot of time adjusting and aiming. In the end, I let it settle for about two days and it seemed to lock to a certain sector. Signal steady at 80 and rssi -51. I then picked a center sector (36) and locked to that on both antennas (I was just trying things out)....
It ran solid that way for about 24 hours and then once again, for no apparent reason, the TX-Sector suddenly shifted causing the signal to drop to 50 and the RSSI to jump to -70. But, even with the poor RSSI, the MCS stayed at 8 (PHY 2.3). I let it run that way for a couple of hours and during that time there appeared to be no loss in throughput and no significant latency. The link remained rock solid despite the odd readings. Eventually, though I toggled it from auto TX-Sector to manual and back again forcing it to realign, after which it settled at about -64, with a signal of 80.
As I said previously,the first time this happened I suspected wind gusts as we noted some guts around the same time period, but in all of the subsequent shifts, there have been no significant weather changes.
One other interesting observation is that when it makes this shift, the link does not drop (which is good). I am polling the data once every minute (as well as logging it) and note that it just seems to suddenly jump from one sector to another, with no searching or hoping around.
Which ROS? Beamforming Auto or Manual?
Thanks for spending you time trying to find this info. The link to the FCC's list of Mikrotik certifications was, however, posted up-thread already. It may also serve as a small window into future Mikrotik products that they have yet to announce(or do they announce them when the FCC posts the certs?).....For all those questions regarding EIRP and TX power and all the other technical information..I, me, the one, have answers....Ok enough suspense (3 hours of searching)
BAM!
https://fccid.io/TV7LHGG60AD/Test-Repor ... rt-3767854
Your Welcome