Hello,
in many places i've experienced, that good old Nstreme has much better thruput in noisy environment than NV2.

NV2 have a bunch of nice features, and i know, its much different, but in many areas i have to switch back to nstreme, because nstreme simply outperforms the new protocol, even if CCQ parameters seems good.

for example
NV2 downstream ~55mbps upstream ~20mbps (NOT in the same time)
Nstreme downstream ~65mbps upstream ~45mbps (NOT in the same time), and happily do 50/20mbps tcp (btest, with both directions)

Yes, where air is "clean" nv2 works well, now improvements coming (like dynamic/static downstream percentage, sync between aps), but why robustness gone away?

reduce power - and nv2 should perform better.

where to reduce power?
On client TX or AP TX ?