Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Fri Jun 28, 2019 12:01 am

Hello,

I recently purchased a pack of Microtik Wireless Dish.
I have configured the master / slave pack with master (192.168.88.2) and slave (192.168.88.3).
The distance to which they are installed is 71.2 meters and there is no misalignment in the antennas.
Firmware version is 6.44.3 (stable).

The problem is that when I do a bandwith test (random data) from the master to the slave I get UDP with a bandwidth of approximately 945Mbps in both Tx and RX simultaneously. But, when I chose to do the test with TCP (random data) the bandwidth drops to 254Mbps Tx / Rx

Can someone tell me if this is normal?
If there is an error, I will post the configuration files of the master and the slave.

Can someone help me?

Greetings to all
 
antonsb
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2016 3:12 pm
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Fri Jun 28, 2019 4:51 pm

Btest is limited by device resources. Please run Btest on other, powerfull devices through created 60GHz link
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Sat Jun 29, 2019 1:21 pm

Thank you very much for your reply

This performance problem with the bandwith test seems to be common in most of your hardware. Maybe you should make a warning in both Webfig and Winbox to avoid questions and / or questions to the technical support service or the forum community.

I will do the test with two PCs on both sides of the link and I will comment the results here.

Do you have a Btest version for Windows?

Thank you all,
 
igpetkov
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2014 10:27 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Sat Jun 29, 2019 2:01 pm

 
DanAtCommon
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2019 5:58 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Mon Jul 01, 2019 3:54 am

71.2 meters is really close for these dishes. Unfortunately there’s no more tx-power control so a pair of the original Wireless Wires is a better choice.

Question for Mikrotik: can we get tx-power control back?
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Mon Jul 01, 2019 11:45 am

Hi,

Effectively, but when I bought the equipment I assumed that -at least- they would have a power regulation of emission for less power in case of short distances or oversaturation.

The Microtik documentation should be more extensive and of higher quality. It would be a good boost for your sales.

Later I will post some performance tests with iperf3

Thanks
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Mon Jul 01, 2019 5:09 pm

Network Escheme

MacBook Pro 2,53 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo <==> Switch/Router <==> Wireless Wire Dish <=== Wireless Link ===> << Wireless Wire Dish ==> Switch/Router <===> Man Mini i7

192.168.4.121 <===> 192.168.88.2 <=== Wireless Link ===> 192.168.88.3 <===> 192.168.6.41

192.168.88.2
Captura de pantalla 2019-07-01 a las 16.04.05.png
192.168.88.3
Captura de pantalla 2019-07-01 a las 16.03.26.png

iperf3 for OSX

With UDP

Mac-Mini-i7:Downloads TPF$ ./iperf3 -c 192.168.4.121 -u -fm
Connecting to host 192.168.4.121, port 5201
[ 4] local 192.168.6.41 port 53986 connected to 192.168.4.121 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 4] 1.00-2.01 sec 128 KBytes 1.04 Mbits/sec 16
[ 4] 2.01-3.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 4] 9.00-10.01 sec 128 KBytes 1.04 Mbits/sec 16
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-10.01 sec 1.25 MBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 4] Sent 0 datagrams

With TCP

Mac-Mini-i7:Downloads TPF$ ./iperf3 -c 192.168.4.121 -fm
Connecting to host 192.168.4.121, port 5201
[ 4] local 192.168.6.41 port 53515 connected to 192.168.4.121 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 92.9 MBytes 779 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 1.00-2.01 sec 4.47 MBytes 37.3 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 2.01-3.00 sec 695 KBytes 5.72 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 30.1 MBytes 252 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 89.5 MBytes 751 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 5.00-6.01 sec 23.1 MBytes 192 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 6.01-7.00 sec 5.78 MBytes 48.8 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 83.4 MBytes 699 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 35.6 MBytes 297 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 9.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-10.01 sec 365 MBytes 306 Mbits/sec sender
[ 4] 0.00-10.01 sec 364 MBytes 306 Mbits/sec receiver

What do you think about this?

I ask for opinions and suggestions


Thanks to everyone

Thomas
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
antonsb
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2016 3:12 pm
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Mon Jul 01, 2019 5:23 pm

please add multiple parallel streams with -P option, for UDP, you have to set transfer speed as well.
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Mon Jul 01, 2019 6:19 pm

Hello,

Mac-Mini-i7:Downloads TPF$ ./iperf3 -c 192.168.4.121 -u -fm -P125
Connecting to host 192.168.4.121, port 5201
.....
[SUM] 0.00-10.01 sec 156 MBytes 131 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
iperf Done.

Complete result file:
results.txt

Please indicate to me what options (command line) I should execute specifically for iperf3 test.

Best regards and Thanks,
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Mon Jul 01, 2019 6:41 pm

Hi,

Mac-Mini-i7:Downloads TPF$ ./iperf3 -c 192.168.4.121 -u -fm -P 125 -b 1000
....
[SUM] 0.00-10.01 sec 98.6 MBytes 82.7 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)

Best regards,

Thomas
 
DanAtCommon
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2019 5:58 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Mon Jul 01, 2019 6:48 pm

-P with UDP isn’t needed, and will just create n number of streams at the specified bandwidth. Try ‘-b 1G’ and don’t use ‘-fm’ as I believe it outputs as mebibits despite the “Mbps” designation.
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Mon Jul 01, 2019 7:01 pm

Hi,

[Mac-Mini-i7:Downloads TPF$ ./iperf3 -c 192.168.4.121 -u -b 1G
Connecting to host 192.168.4.121, port 5201
[ 4] local 192.168.6.41 port 64050 connected to 192.168.4.121 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 88.0 MBytes 738 Mbits/sec 28032
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 93.5 MBytes 784 Mbits/sec 27660
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 93.0 MBytes 780 Mbits/sec 25281
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 94.1 MBytes 789 Mbits/sec 26721
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 99.0 MBytes 830 Mbits/sec 26206
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 95.1 MBytes 798 Mbits/sec 26109
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 94.2 MBytes 790 Mbits/sec 24198
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 96.5 MBytes 810 Mbits/sec 26987
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 95.1 MBytes 798 Mbits/sec 24603
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 93.7 MBytes 786 Mbits/sec 24352
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 942 MBytes 790 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 4] Sent 0 datagrams

iperf Done.



[Mac-Mini-i7:Downloads TPF$ ./iperf3 -c 192.168.4.121 -b 1G
Connecting to host 192.168.4.121, port 5201
[ 4] local 192.168.6.41 port 55129 connected to 192.168.4.121 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 99.1 MBytes 831 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 66.9 MBytes 561 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 404 KBytes 3.31 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 44.8 MBytes 376 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 54.6 MBytes 458 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 61.6 MBytes 518 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 99.9 MBytes 836 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 49.7 MBytes 418 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 477 MBytes 400 Mbits/sec sender
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 477 MBytes 400 Mbits/sec receiver

iperf Done.

Thank you

Thomas
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Mon Jul 01, 2019 7:41 pm

Hello,

I just tried a transfer through the wireless link with SMB protocol between a Macbook Pro (192.168.4.121) and a NAS Synology DS918 + (192.168.6.10) out of a total of 57.63GB (23 files) and the average speed has been 40.96 MB / s

What do you think?

Greetings to all
 
DanAtCommon
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2019 5:58 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Mon Jul 01, 2019 7:52 pm

Your client (Mac-Mini-i7) seems to be limited in the number of packets it can generate. You should be seeing closer to 940 Mbps on the client output.
Try `./iperf3 -c 192.168.4.121 -P4` for the TCP test. TCP will ramp up and use as much bandwidth as possible during the test, so you don't have to specify bandwidth for the test.
The drop-outs are most concerning. What do the radio stats look like during the test? Run `/interface w60g monitor 0` on the radios while running the test and check the signal levels and MCS.
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:09 pm

Hello,

Mac-Mini-i7:Downloads TPF$ ./iperf3 -c 192.168.4.121 -P4
Connecting to host 192.168.4.121, port 5201
[ 4] local 192.168.6.41 port 56609 connected to 192.168.4.121 port 5201
[ 6] local 192.168.6.41 port 56610 connected to 192.168.4.121 port 5201
[ 8] local 192.168.6.41 port 56611 connected to 192.168.4.121 port 5201
[ 10] local 192.168.6.41 port 56612 connected to 192.168.4.121 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 12.2 MBytes 102 Mbits/sec
[ 6] 0.00-1.00 sec 46.1 MBytes 387 Mbits/sec
[ 8] 0.00-1.00 sec 7.03 MBytes 59.0 Mbits/sec
[ 10] 0.00-1.00 sec 10.8 MBytes 90.7 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 0.00-1.00 sec 76.2 MBytes 639 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 1.00-2.01 sec 3.86 MBytes 32.2 Mbits/sec
[ 6] 1.00-2.01 sec 51.4 MBytes 429 Mbits/sec
[ 8] 1.00-2.01 sec 7.08 MBytes 59.0 Mbits/sec
[ 10] 1.00-2.01 sec 2.29 MBytes 19.1 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 1.00-2.01 sec 64.6 MBytes 539 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 2.01-3.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
[ 6] 2.01-3.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
[ 8] 2.01-3.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
[ 10] 2.01-3.00 sec 24.4 MBytes 206 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 2.01-3.00 sec 24.4 MBytes 206 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 2.58 MBytes 21.5 Mbits/sec
[ 6] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.75 MBytes 14.6 Mbits/sec
[ 8] 3.00-4.00 sec 4.25 MBytes 35.5 Mbits/sec
[ 10] 3.00-4.00 sec 54.7 MBytes 457 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 3.00-4.00 sec 63.3 MBytes 529 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
[ 6] 4.00-5.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
[ 8] 4.00-5.00 sec 27.5 MBytes 231 Mbits/sec
[ 10] 4.00-5.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
[SUM] 4.00-5.00 sec 27.5 MBytes 231 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 2.36 MBytes 19.7 Mbits/sec
[ 6] 5.00-6.00 sec 2.38 MBytes 19.9 Mbits/sec
[ 8] 5.00-6.00 sec 55.1 MBytes 460 Mbits/sec
[ 10] 5.00-6.00 sec 4.76 MBytes 39.8 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 5.00-6.00 sec 64.6 MBytes 540 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 5.84 MBytes 49.2 Mbits/sec
[ 6] 6.00-7.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
[ 8] 6.00-7.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
[ 10] 6.00-7.00 sec 21.3 MBytes 179 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 6.00-7.00 sec 27.1 MBytes 228 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 7.00-8.01 sec 22.2 MBytes 185 Mbits/sec
[ 6] 7.00-8.01 sec 1.52 MBytes 12.7 Mbits/sec
[ 8] 7.00-8.01 sec 2.82 MBytes 23.6 Mbits/sec
[ 10] 7.00-8.01 sec 38.3 MBytes 320 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 7.00-8.01 sec 64.9 MBytes 541 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 8.01-9.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
[ 6] 8.01-9.00 sec 2.75 MBytes 23.1 Mbits/sec
[ 8] 8.01-9.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
[ 10] 8.01-9.00 sec 11.5 MBytes 96.6 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 8.01-9.00 sec 14.2 MBytes 120 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
[ 6] 9.00-10.00 sec 37.7 MBytes 316 Mbits/sec
[ 8] 9.00-10.00 sec 7.84 MBytes 65.8 Mbits/sec
[ 10] 9.00-10.00 sec 55.2 MBytes 463 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 9.00-10.00 sec 101 MBytes 844 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 49.0 MBytes 41.1 Mbits/sec sender
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 48.7 MBytes 40.9 Mbits/sec receiver
[ 6] 0.00-10.00 sec 144 MBytes 120 Mbits/sec sender
[ 6] 0.00-10.00 sec 143 MBytes 120 Mbits/sec receiver
[ 8] 0.00-10.00 sec 112 MBytes 93.6 Mbits/sec sender
[ 8] 0.00-10.00 sec 111 MBytes 93.5 Mbits/sec receiver
[ 10] 0.00-10.00 sec 223 MBytes 187 Mbits/sec sender
[ 10] 0.00-10.00 sec 223 MBytes 187 Mbits/sec receiver
[SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 527 MBytes 442 Mbits/sec sender
[SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 526 MBytes 441 Mbits/sec receiver

iperf Done.

192.168.88.2

frequency: 58320
remote-address: 6C:C7:EC:9E:D2:C6
tx-mode: dmg
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 95
rssi: -50
tx-sector: 59
tx-sector-info: left 0.2 degrees, up 1.4 degrees
distance: 71.79m
tx-packet-error-rate: 0%
-- [Q quit|D dump|C-z pause]


192.168.88.3

frequency: 58320
remote-address: 6C:C7:EC:9E:D2:BD
tx-mode: dmg
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 80
rssi: -48
tx-sector: 59
tx-sector-info: left 0.2 degrees, up 1.4 degrees
distance: 71.72m
tx-packet-error-rate: 0%
-- [Q quit|D dump|C-z pause]

Signal and RSSI and MCS seem to be correct.

Thanks very much
 
DanAtCommon
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2019 5:58 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:21 pm

That should be great. Something is interrupting the flows, but it's really hard to tell what. Mikrotik might have a better answer for you, but all I can think of is the signal is too hot at that distance.
Of course, we have no way of turning down the power. If you can, try a pair of the original Wireless Wires at that distance and see if it's any better.

P.S. I'm don't see the remote report on your UDP tests, so you're only seeing the amount of traffic generated, not the amount that made it to the other side. Try to monitor the output of the iperf3 server on the other end to get an idea of packet loss. Are you able to ping the other side and measure packet loss and latency that way?
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Mon Jul 01, 2019 9:07 pm

Thank you very much for your reply

Tomorrow I will do the new tests and post the results.

Thanks again
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Tue Jul 02, 2019 5:17 pm

Hello,

Sender
Captura de pantalla 2019-07-02 a las 16.13.14.png
Mac-Mini-i7:Downloads TPF$ ./iperf3 -c 192.168.4.121 -P4
Connecting to host 192.168.4.121, port 5201
[ 4] local 192.168.6.41 port 61353 connected to 192.168.4.121 port 5201
[ 6] local 192.168.6.41 port 61354 connected to 192.168.4.121 port 5201
[ 8] local 192.168.6.41 port 61355 connected to 192.168.4.121 port 5201
[ 10] local 192.168.6.41 port 61356 connected to 192.168.4.121 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 4.46 MBytes 37.4 Mbits/sec
[ 6] 0.00-1.00 sec 873 KBytes 7.15 Mbits/sec
[ 8] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.67 MBytes 14.0 Mbits/sec
[ 10] 0.00-1.00 sec 3.56 MBytes 29.8 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 0.00-1.00 sec 10.5 MBytes 88.4 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 546 KBytes 4.47 Mbits/sec
[ 6] 1.00-2.00 sec 4.36 MBytes 36.6 Mbits/sec
[ 8] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.01 MBytes 8.48 Mbits/sec
[ 10] 1.00-2.00 sec 3.92 MBytes 32.9 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 1.00-2.00 sec 9.83 MBytes 82.4 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 273 KBytes 2.23 Mbits/sec
[ 6] 2.00-3.00 sec 4.41 MBytes 36.9 Mbits/sec
[ 8] 2.00-3.00 sec 2.96 MBytes 24.8 Mbits/sec
[ 10] 2.00-3.00 sec 285 KBytes 2.33 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 2.00-3.00 sec 7.92 MBytes 66.2 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.57 MBytes 13.2 Mbits/sec
[ 6] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.91 MBytes 16.0 Mbits/sec
[ 8] 3.00-4.00 sec 2.81 MBytes 23.6 Mbits/sec
[ 10] 3.00-4.00 sec 2.05 MBytes 17.2 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 3.00-4.00 sec 8.35 MBytes 70.0 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 2.99 MBytes 25.2 Mbits/sec
[ 6] 4.00-5.00 sec 2.99 MBytes 25.2 Mbits/sec
[ 8] 4.00-5.00 sec 1.92 MBytes 16.2 Mbits/sec
[ 10] 4.00-5.00 sec 3.03 MBytes 25.5 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 4.00-5.00 sec 10.9 MBytes 92.0 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 3.34 MBytes 28.0 Mbits/sec
[ 6] 5.00-6.00 sec 2.79 MBytes 23.4 Mbits/sec
[ 8] 5.00-6.00 sec 2.40 MBytes 20.2 Mbits/sec
[ 10] 5.00-6.00 sec 786 KBytes 6.44 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 5.00-6.00 sec 9.30 MBytes 78.1 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 2.06 MBytes 17.3 Mbits/sec
[ 6] 6.00-7.00 sec 3.92 MBytes 32.9 Mbits/sec
[ 8] 6.00-7.00 sec 2.00 MBytes 16.8 Mbits/sec
[ 10] 6.00-7.00 sec 867 KBytes 7.10 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 6.00-7.00 sec 8.82 MBytes 74.0 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 5.14 MBytes 43.1 Mbits/sec
[ 6] 7.00-8.00 sec 2.84 MBytes 23.8 Mbits/sec
[ 8] 7.00-8.00 sec 121 KBytes 991 Kbits/sec
[ 10] 7.00-8.00 sec 1.42 MBytes 11.9 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 7.00-8.00 sec 9.52 MBytes 79.8 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 5.26 MBytes 43.9 Mbits/sec
[ 6] 8.00-9.00 sec 1.14 MBytes 9.51 Mbits/sec
[ 8] 8.00-9.00 sec 2.61 MBytes 21.8 Mbits/sec
[ 10] 8.00-9.00 sec 740 KBytes 6.04 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 8.00-9.00 sec 9.73 MBytes 81.3 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 4.74 MBytes 39.9 Mbits/sec
[ 6] 9.00-10.00 sec 3.10 MBytes 26.1 Mbits/sec
[ 8] 9.00-10.00 sec 368 KBytes 3.02 Mbits/sec
[ 10] 9.00-10.00 sec 676 KBytes 5.56 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 9.00-10.00 sec 8.86 MBytes 74.6 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 30.4 MBytes 25.5 Mbits/sec sender
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 30.2 MBytes 25.4 Mbits/sec receiver
[ 6] 0.00-10.00 sec 28.3 MBytes 23.8 Mbits/sec sender
[ 6] 0.00-10.00 sec 28.2 MBytes 23.6 Mbits/sec receiver
[ 8] 0.00-10.00 sec 17.9 MBytes 15.0 Mbits/sec sender
[ 8] 0.00-10.00 sec 17.7 MBytes 14.9 Mbits/sec receiver
[ 10] 0.00-10.00 sec 17.2 MBytes 14.5 Mbits/sec sender
[ 10] 0.00-10.00 sec 17.1 MBytes 14.4 Mbits/sec receiver
[SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 93.8 MBytes 78.7 Mbits/sec sender
[SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 93.3 MBytes 78.3 Mbits/sec receiver

iperf Done.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Receiver
Captura de pantalla 2019-07-02 a las 16.13.22.png
Mac-Book-Pro:Downloads Administrador$ clear; ./iperf3 -s
-----------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on 5201
-----------------------------------------------------------
Accepted connection from 192.168.6.41, port 61352
[ 5] local 192.168.4.121 port 5201 connected to 192.168.6.41 port 61353
[ 7] local 192.168.4.121 port 5201 connected to 192.168.6.41 port 61354
[ 9] local 192.168.4.121 port 5201 connected to 192.168.6.41 port 61355
[ 11] local 192.168.4.121 port 5201 connected to 192.168.6.41 port 61356
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 4.28 MBytes 35.9 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 0.00-1.00 sec 747 KBytes 6.12 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.54 MBytes 12.9 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 0.00-1.00 sec 3.43 MBytes 28.8 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 0.00-1.00 sec 9.98 MBytes 83.7 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 602 KBytes 4.93 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 1.00-2.00 sec 4.33 MBytes 36.4 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.01 MBytes 8.49 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 1.00-2.00 sec 3.87 MBytes 32.5 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 1.00-2.00 sec 9.81 MBytes 82.3 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 273 KBytes 2.23 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 2.00-3.00 sec 4.38 MBytes 36.7 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 2.00-3.00 sec 2.96 MBytes 24.8 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 2.00-3.00 sec 335 KBytes 2.74 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 2.00-3.00 sec 7.94 MBytes 66.4 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.57 MBytes 13.2 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.97 MBytes 16.6 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 3.00-4.00 sec 2.80 MBytes 23.5 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 3.00-4.00 sec 2.05 MBytes 17.2 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 3.00-4.00 sec 8.39 MBytes 70.4 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 2.99 MBytes 25.1 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 4.00-5.00 sec 2.98 MBytes 25.0 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 4.00-5.00 sec 1.92 MBytes 16.1 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 4.00-5.00 sec 2.98 MBytes 25.1 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 4.00-5.00 sec 10.9 MBytes 91.3 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 3.34 MBytes 28.0 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 5.00-6.00 sec 2.77 MBytes 23.3 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 5.00-6.00 sec 2.40 MBytes 20.1 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 5.00-6.00 sec 834 KBytes 6.83 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 5.00-6.00 sec 9.32 MBytes 78.2 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 2.06 MBytes 17.3 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 6.00-7.00 sec 3.90 MBytes 32.7 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 6.00-7.00 sec 2.03 MBytes 17.1 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 6.00-7.00 sec 863 KBytes 7.07 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 6.00-7.00 sec 8.83 MBytes 74.1 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 5.14 MBytes 43.1 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 7.00-8.00 sec 2.85 MBytes 23.9 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 7.00-8.00 sec 120 KBytes 979 Kbits/sec
[ 11] 7.00-8.00 sec 1.42 MBytes 11.9 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 7.00-8.00 sec 9.53 MBytes 79.9 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 5.21 MBytes 43.5 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 8.00-9.00 sec 1.17 MBytes 9.78 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 8.00-9.00 sec 2.59 MBytes 21.6 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 8.00-9.00 sec 747 KBytes 6.09 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 8.00-9.00 sec 9.70 MBytes 81.0 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 4.71 MBytes 39.7 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 9.00-10.00 sec 3.10 MBytes 26.1 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 9.00-10.00 sec 382 KBytes 3.15 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 9.00-10.00 sec 669 KBytes 5.51 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 9.00-10.00 sec 8.84 MBytes 74.5 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 10.00-10.01 sec 85.8 KBytes 126 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 10.00-10.01 sec 1.41 KBytes 2.07 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 10.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
[ 11] 10.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
[SUM] 10.00-10.01 sec 87.2 KBytes 128 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 30.2 MBytes 25.4 Mbits/sec receiver
[ 7] 0.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec sender
[ 7] 0.00-10.01 sec 28.2 MBytes 23.6 Mbits/sec receiver
[ 9] 0.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec sender
[ 9] 0.00-10.01 sec 17.7 MBytes 14.9 Mbits/sec receiver
[ 11] 0.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec sender
[ 11] 0.00-10.01 sec 17.1 MBytes 14.4 Mbits/sec receiver
[SUM] 0.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec sender
[SUM] 0.00-10.01 sec 93.3 MBytes 78.2 Mbits/sec receiver

Best regards and thank you very much.

Thomas
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
DanAtCommon
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2019 5:58 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Tue Jul 02, 2019 6:17 pm

What about UDP?
Is that with the small Wireless Wires or the dishes?
This test is worse than ever. The fact that it never gets above 100 Mbps is concerning; are the cables on both ends OK?
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Tue Jul 02, 2019 6:26 pm

This is LHG60 Wireless Dish.

The wiring gives me the impression that it is fine.

Something must be failing in the configuration because this is not normal.

UDP fails?

Mac-Mini-i7:Downloads TPF$ ./iperf3 -c 192.168.4.121 -u -P4
Connecting to host 192.168.4.121, port 5201
[ 4] local 192.168.6.41 port 64681 connected to 192.168.4.121 port 5201
[ 6] local 192.168.6.41 port 64576 connected to 192.168.4.121 port 5201
[ 8] local 192.168.6.41 port 56585 connected to 192.168.4.121 port 5201
[ 10] local 192.168.6.41 port 63724 connected to 192.168.4.121 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 6] 0.00-1.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 8] 0.00-1.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 10] 0.00-1.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[SUM] 0.00-1.00 sec 512 KBytes 4.18 Mbits/sec 64
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 6] 1.00-2.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 8] 1.00-2.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 10] 1.00-2.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[SUM] 1.00-2.00 sec 512 KBytes 4.19 Mbits/sec 64
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 6] 2.00-3.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 8] 2.00-3.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 10] 2.00-3.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[SUM] 2.00-3.00 sec 512 KBytes 4.20 Mbits/sec 64
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 6] 3.00-4.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 8] 3.00-4.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 10] 3.00-4.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[SUM] 3.00-4.00 sec 512 KBytes 4.20 Mbits/sec 64
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 6] 4.00-5.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 8] 4.00-5.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 10] 4.00-5.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[SUM] 4.00-5.00 sec 512 KBytes 4.19 Mbits/sec 64
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 6] 5.00-6.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 8] 5.00-6.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 10] 5.00-6.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[SUM] 5.00-6.00 sec 512 KBytes 4.19 Mbits/sec 64
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 6] 6.00-7.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 8] 6.00-7.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 10] 6.00-7.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[SUM] 6.00-7.00 sec 512 KBytes 4.21 Mbits/sec 64
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 6] 7.00-8.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 8] 7.00-8.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 10] 7.00-8.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[SUM] 7.00-8.00 sec 512 KBytes 4.19 Mbits/sec 64
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 6] 8.00-9.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 8] 8.00-9.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 10] 8.00-9.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[SUM] 8.00-9.00 sec 512 KBytes 4.19 Mbits/sec 64
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 6] 9.00-10.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 8] 9.00-10.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[ 10] 9.00-10.00 sec 128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 16
[SUM] 9.00-10.00 sec 512 KBytes 4.20 Mbits/sec 64
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.25 MBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 4] Sent 0 datagrams
[ 6] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.25 MBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 6] Sent 0 datagrams
[ 8] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.25 MBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 8] Sent 0 datagrams
[ 10] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.25 MBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 10] Sent 0 datagrams
[SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 5.00 MBytes 4.19 Mbits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)

iperf Done.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Mac-Book-Pro:Downloads Administrador$ clear; ./iperf3 -s

-----------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on 5201
-----------------------------------------------------------
Accepted connection from 192.168.6.41, port 62732
[ 5] local 192.168.4.121 port 5201 connected to 192.168.6.41 port 59473
[ 6] local 192.168.4.121 port 5201 connected to 192.168.6.41 port 49996
[ 8] local 192.168.4.121 port 5201 connected to 192.168.6.41 port 51823
[ 10] local 192.168.4.121 port 5201 connected to 192.168.6.41 port 55581
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 6] 0.00-1.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 8] 0.00-1.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 10] 0.00-1.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[SUM] 0.00-1.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 6] 1.00-2.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 8] 1.00-2.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 10] 1.00-2.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[SUM] 1.00-2.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 6] 2.00-3.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 8] 2.00-3.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 10] 2.00-3.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[SUM] 2.00-3.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 6] 3.00-4.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 8] 3.00-4.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 10] 3.00-4.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[SUM] 3.00-4.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 6] 4.00-5.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 8] 4.00-5.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 10] 4.00-5.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[SUM] 4.00-5.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 6] 5.00-6.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 8] 5.00-6.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 10] 5.00-6.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[SUM] 5.00-6.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 6] 6.00-7.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 8] 6.00-7.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 10] 6.00-7.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[SUM] 6.00-7.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 6] 7.00-8.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 8] 7.00-8.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 10] 7.00-8.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[SUM] 7.00-8.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 6] 8.00-9.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 8] 8.00-9.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 10] 8.00-9.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[SUM] 8.00-9.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 6] 9.00-10.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 8] 9.00-10.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 10] 9.00-10.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[SUM] 9.00-10.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 10.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 6] 10.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 8] 10.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 10] 10.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[SUM] 10.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 6] 0.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 8] 0.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[ 10] 0.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
[SUM] 0.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.000 ms 0/0 (0%)
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Tue Jul 02, 2019 6:30 pm

Yesterday, I did a test transferring 57.63GB from a NAS (12.168.6.10) to the MacBook Pro (192.168.4.121) and it took 24 minutes which is equivalent to 40.96MB / s.
Half of the theoretical 1Gbit / s of the link.

Now I'm doing a similar test and see what the results are (For now six times slower).

I think it's going to be a matter of burning the equipment to the fire... :-(
Greetings
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Tue Jul 02, 2019 6:44 pm

192.168.88.3

[admin@MikroTik] /interface w60g> monitor
numbers: 0
connected: yes
frequency: 58320
remote-address: 6C:C7:EC:9E:D2:BD
tx-mode: dmg
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 80
rssi: -50
tx-sector: 7
tx-sector-info: right 1.4 degrees, down 1.4 degrees
distance: 71.56m
tx-packet-error-rate: 1%
-- [Q quit|D dump|C-z pause]

192.168.88.2

[admin@MikroTik] /interface w60g> monitor
numbers: 0
connected: yes
frequency: 58320
remote-address: 6C:C7:EC:9E:D2:C6
tx-mode: dmg
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 95
rssi: -50
tx-sector: 17
tx-sector-info: left 1 degrees, down 0.6 degrees
distance: 71.79m
tx-packet-error-rate: 23%
-- [Q quit|D dump|C-z pause]
 
DanAtCommon
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2019 5:58 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Tue Jul 02, 2019 6:49 pm

Are both sides’ Ethernet ports negotiating at 1 Gbps?
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Tue Jul 02, 2019 7:27 pm

Hello,

Yes, according to microtik equipment.
Captura de pantalla 2019-07-02 a las 18.25.27.png
Best regards,
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
DanAtCommon
just joined
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2019 5:58 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Tue Jul 02, 2019 7:45 pm

Well I'm out of ideas. Try a different channel? The 23% packet error rate isn't great. Still makes me think the signal's too hot.
@antons?
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Tue Jul 02, 2019 7:52 pm

I post some tests between the two Wireless Dish by means of bandwith test (that will not be the best) but in UDP it reaches the maximum performance of the link and in TCP it remains in 250-300Mbit / s.

I put the screens in send, receive an both.
Captura de pantalla 2019-07-02 a las 18.39.11.png
Captura de pantalla 2019-07-02 a las 18.39.53.png
Captura de pantalla 2019-07-02 a las 18.40.18.png
If you notice, in one direction the router is capable of general traffic to reach 800Mbit / s in TCP. When it falls to 250/300 it is when we try it in both directions, I suppose due to lack of processing capacity.

Greetings to all,
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Tue Jul 02, 2019 10:19 pm

Please,

Any suggestions and / or help from the Microtik support department?

Best regards,
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Wed Jul 03, 2019 2:08 am

Hello,

I upgraded to the latest version 6.45beta62 and used as a 66,000MHz link frequency

I have done some additional tests this night and discover that by doing a bandwith test receiving TCP 100 connections I get 734Mbits of performance. But be careful, I was simultaneously making a copy from a NAS (6.10) to a MacBook (4.121) of 36.64GB and the speed of this last data transfer did not suffer too much.

I think there may be a problem with Macs that are not able to give enough data flow for tests with iperf and others. I will try next days to try two x86 PCs with i5 and i7 processors and Intel cards to see if the problem could be in the Mac. I hope so and I will avoid having to throw the Microtik Wire Dish in the trash.

In any case, I reiterate that Microtik's documentation is very scarce and poorly organized. You should dedicate an Engineer for at least one year to prepare a coherent and didactic documentation on RouterOs.

All opinions and suggestions are welcome to see if we can solve this performance problem.

Greetings to all and especially to those who have contributed in this post.

Thomas
 
antonsb
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2016 3:12 pm
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Wed Jul 03, 2019 10:57 pm

Well I'm out of ideas. Try a different channel? The 23% packet error rate isn't great. Still makes me think the signal's too hot.
@antons?
Signal may be too hot, but in this case it seems that this is caused somewhere else.
Is there any other devices in between PCs and Wireless Wire dishes?
My first guess was that traffic generation was bottle necking Mac mini single core as well, adding -P argument and multiple parallel streams should give some improvement.
edit:
based on this:
https://github.com/esnet/iperf/issues/289
it seems that -P isn't much help.
As a workaround try opening multiple servers and multiple tests in parallel

You can also set-up traffic-generator (more resource friendly UDP test)
if addresses are still - master (192.168.88.2) and slave (192.168.88.3)

in master device terminal paste:
/tool traffic-generator packet-template
add ip-dst=192.168.88.2 ip-gateway=192.168.88.3 udp-dst-port=0-100 name=test1
/tool traffic-generator stream
add mbps=900 name=str0 packet-size=1500 tx-template=test1

before each test refresh template by running:
/tool traffic-generator packet-template set [find]
and run test:
/tool traffic-generator quick mbps=900

this will create bi-directional (loopback) UDP packet stream.
More information available here:
https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:T ... _Generator

Documentation is written by following KIS (Keep It Simple) design principles, it may not include in depth tutorials, but will be based on absolute minimum information to get users started.
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Thu Jul 04, 2019 2:09 pm

Good morning,

In 192.168.88.2 (bridge)

[admin @ MikroTik] / interface w60g> / tool
[admin @ MikroTik] / tool> traffic-generator packet-template
[admin @ MikroTik] / tool traffic-generator packet-template> add ip-dst = 192.168.88.2 ip-gateway = 192.168.88.3 udp-dst-port = 0-100 name = test1
[admin @ MikroTik] / tool traffic-generator packet-template> ..
[admin @ MikroTik] / tool traffic-generator> stream
[admin @ MikroTik] / tool traffic-generator stream> add mbps = 900 name = str0 packet-size = 1500 tx-template = test1
[admin @ MikroTik] / tool traffic-generator stream> ..
[admin @ MikroTik] / tool traffic-generator> packet-template set [find]
[admin @ MikroTik] / tool traffic-generator> quick mbps = 900

SEQ ID TX-PACKET TX-RATE RX-PACKET RX-RATE RX-OOO RX-BAD-CSUM LOST-PACKET LOST-RATE LOST-RATIO LAT-MIN LAT-AVG LAT-MAX JITTER
39 0 75 002 900.0Mbps 0 0bps 0 75 002 900.0Mbps 100.%
40 0 74 999 899.9Mbps 0 0bps 0 74 999 899.9Mbps 100.%
41 0 74 996 899.9Mbps 0 0bps 0 74 996 899.9Mbps 100.%
42 0 75 006 900.0Mbps 0 0bps 0 75 006 900.0Mbps 100.%
43 0 74 998 899.9Mbps 0 0bps 0 74 998 899.9Mbps 100.%
44 0 74 999 899.9Mbps 0 0bps 0 74 999 899.9Mbps 100.%
45 0 74 997 899.9Mbps 0 0bps 0 74 997 899.9Mbps 100.%
46 0 74 999 899.9Mbps 0 0bps 0 74 999 899.9Mbps 100.%
47 0 75 004 900.0Mbps 0 0bps 0 75 004 900.0Mbps 100.%
48 0 75 003 900.0Mbps 0 0bps 0 75 003 900.0Mbps 100.%
49 0 74 943 899.3Mbps 0 0bps 0 74 943 899.3Mbps 100.%
50 0 75 051 900.6Mbps 0 0bps 0 75 051 900.6Mbps 100.%
51 0 74 789 897.4Mbps 0 0bps 0 74 789 897.4Mbps 100.%
52 0 75 216 902.5Mbps 0 0bps 0 75 216 902.5Mbps 100.%
53 0 74 995 899.9Mbps 0 0bps 0 74 995 899.9Mbps 100.%
54 0 75 006 900.0Mbps 0 0bps 0 75 006 900.0Mbps 100.%
55 0 74 998 899.9Mbps 0 0bps 0 74 998 899.9Mbps 100.%
56 0 74 997 899.9Mbps 0 0bps 0 74 997 899.9Mbps 100.%
57 0 75 007 900.0Mbps 0 0bps 0 75 007 900.0Mbps 100.%
TOT 0 4 274 954 899.9Mbps 0 0bps 0 4 274 954 899.9Mbps 100.%

[admin @ MikroTik] / tool traffic-generator> / interface w60g monitor
numbers: 0
             connected: yes
             frequency: 58320
         remote-address: 6C: C7: EC: 9E: D2: C6
             tx-mcs: 3
            tx-phy-rate: 962.0Mbps
             signal: 40
             rssi: -49
             tx-sector: 50
         tx-sector-info: left 0.6 degrees, up 1 degrees
             distance: 71.84m
   tx-packet-error-rate: 15%


In 192.168.88.3 (station bridge)

[admin @ MikroTik]> interface w60g
[admin @ MikroTik] / interface w60g> monitor 0
             connected: yes
             frequency: 58320
         remote-address: 6C: C7: EC: 9E: D2: BD
             tx-mcs: 4
            tx-phy-rate: 1155.0Mbps
             signal: 40
             rssi: -49
             tx-sector: 18
         tx-sector-info: left 0.6 degrees, down 0.6 degrees
             distance: 71.77m
   tx-packet-error-rate: 28%
- [Q quit | D dump | C-z pause]

Best regard,
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Thu Jul 04, 2019 2:19 pm

Anton,

Effectively there are different equipment (switches and routers) between the wireless dish and the PCs or Macs.

Yesterday I did more tests and got a performance of 54MB / s with transfer of NFS files (v3 TCP) between two NAS Synology.

But the funny thing was that when I wanted to connect the NAS to each other through the NFS (v3 UDP) the connection did not come to occur.

For the tests I have done:

1) The quality of the signal fluctuates a lot from one day to the next. Yesterday signal80 / MCS8 and today signal40 / MCS4. The antennas are in the same position as yesterday.

2) It seems that there is some problem to transfer UDP traffic.

I will try this afternoon a simpler type connection:

PC (88.121) <==> Switch unmanaged <==> LHG60 (88.2) <------> LHG60 (88.3) <==> Switch unmanaged <==> PC (88.41)

and we will see what happens.

Would it be useful for you to send the configuration files of the two LHG60?

Regards, and thank you very much.
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Thu Jul 04, 2019 2:40 pm

Now the signals and MCS of both teams are about 95/8 and the UDP traffic between both via Bandwith test I think is good.

Attached the graph.

Captura de pantalla 2019-07-04 a las 13.37.43.png

Any suggestions?

Thomas
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Thu Jul 04, 2019 2:43 pm

192.168.88.2

[admin@MikroTik] /interface w60g> monitor 0
connected: yes
frequency: 58320
remote-address: 6C:C7:EC:9E:D2:C6
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 95
rssi: -48
tx-sector: 12
tx-sector-info: right 0.2 degrees, down 1 degrees
distance: 71.84m
tx-packet-error-rate: 20%



192.168.88.3

[admin@MikroTik] /interface w60g> monitor 0
connected: yes
frequency: 58320
remote-address: 6C:C7:EC:9E:D2:BD
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 80
rssi: -48
tx-sector: 54
tx-sector-info: right 1 degrees, up 1 degrees
distance: 71.77m
tx-packet-error-rate: 21%
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Thu Jul 04, 2019 5:56 pm

Try this afternoon a simpler type connection:

Mac BookPro (88.121) <==> Switch unmanaged <==> LHG60 (88.2) <------> LHG60 (88.3) <==> Switch unmanaged <==> Mac i7 (88.41)

192.168.88.41
Mac-Mini-i7:Downloads root# ./iperf3 -c 192.168.88.121
Connecting to host 192.168.88.121, port 5201
[ 4] local 192.168.88.41 port 49182 connected to 192.168.88.121 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 112 MBytes 941 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 112 MBytes 939 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 940 Mbits/sec sender
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 940 Mbits/sec receiver
iperf Done.

192.168.88.41
Mac-Book-Pro:Downloads root# ./iperf3 -s
-----------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on 5201
-----------------------------------------------------------
Accepted connection from 192.168.88.41, port 49181
[ 5] local 192.168.88.121 port 5201 connected to 192.168.88.41 port 49182
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 111 MBytes 932 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 112 MBytes 939 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 10.00-10.01 sec 867 KBytes 944 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 1.09 GBytes 939 Mbits/sec receiver

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

192.168.88.41
Mac-Mini-i7:Downloads root# ./iperf3 -c 192.168.88.121 -d
send_parameters:
{
"tcp": true,
"omit": 0,
"time": 10,
"parallel": 1,
"len": 131072,
"client_version": "3.1.3"
}
Connecting to host 192.168.88.121, port 5201
SO_SNDBUF is 131072
[ 4] local 192.168.88.41 port 49189 connected to 192.168.88.121 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 112 MBytes 939 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 111 MBytes 931 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 112 MBytes 941 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
send_results
{
"cpu_util_total": 37.289556,
"cpu_util_user": 5.644793,
"cpu_util_system": 31.644674,
"sender_has_retransmits": 0,
"streams": [{
"id": 1,
"bytes": 1173902096,
"retransmits": -1,
"jitter": 0,
"errors": 0,
"packets": 0
}]
}
get_results
{
"cpu_util_total": 17.469540,
"cpu_util_user": 1.721357,
"cpu_util_system": 15.748175,
"sender_has_retransmits": -1,
"streams": [{
"id": 1,
"bytes": 1173574624,
"retransmits": -1,
"jitter": 0,
"errors": 0,
"packets": 0
}]
}
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 112 MBytes 939 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 939 Mbits/sec sender
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.09 GBytes 939 Mbits/sec receiver
iperf Done.

192.168.88.121
Mac-Book-Pro:Downloads root# ./iperf3 -s
-----------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on 5201
-----------------------------------------------------------
Accepted connection from 192.168.88.41, port 49188
[ 5] local 192.168.88.121 port 5201 connected to 192.168.88.41 port 49189
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 111 MBytes 932 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 112 MBytes 939 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 112 MBytes 941 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 111 MBytes 931 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 112 MBytes 941 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 112 MBytes 940 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 112 MBytes 939 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 10.00-10.01 sec 766 KBytes 928 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 1.09 GBytes 938 Mbits/sec receiver

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

192.168.88.41
Mac-Mini-i7:Downloads root# ./iperf3 -c 192.168.88.121 -u -b256M
Connecting to host 192.168.88.121, port 5201
[ 4] local 192.168.88.41 port 63471 connected to 192.168.88.121 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 27.9 MBytes 234 Mbits/sec 3576
[ 4] 1.00-2.01 sec 30.5 MBytes 256 Mbits/sec 3906
[ 4] 2.01-3.01 sec 30.6 MBytes 257 Mbits/sec 3917
[ 4] 3.01-4.01 sec 30.4 MBytes 255 Mbits/sec 3887
[ 4] 4.01-5.01 sec 30.6 MBytes 257 Mbits/sec 3914
[ 4] 5.01-6.01 sec 30.5 MBytes 256 Mbits/sec 3910
[ 4] 6.01-7.00 sec 30.5 MBytes 256 Mbits/sec 3903
[ 4] 7.00-8.01 sec 30.6 MBytes 256 Mbits/sec 3911
[ 4] 8.01-9.01 sec 30.6 MBytes 256 Mbits/sec 3912
[ 4] 9.01-10.01 sec 30.5 MBytes 256 Mbits/sec 3906
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 4] 0.00-10.01 sec 303 MBytes 254 Mbits/sec 0.056 ms 465/38741 (1.2%)
[ 4] Sent 38741 datagrams
iperf Done.

192.168.88.121
Accepted connection from 192.168.88.41, port 49198
[ 5] local 192.168.88.121 port 5201 connected to 192.168.88.41 port 63471
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 27.6 MBytes 231 Mbits/sec 0.053 ms 39/3575 (1.1%)
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 30.1 MBytes 252 Mbits/sec 0.063 ms 57/3906 (1.5%)
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 30.1 MBytes 253 Mbits/sec 0.054 ms 62/3917 (1.6%)
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 30.0 MBytes 250 Mbits/sec 0.058 ms 50/3887 (1.3%)
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 30.2 MBytes 254 Mbits/sec 0.059 ms 52/3914 (1.3%)
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 30.2 MBytes 253 Mbits/sec 0.058 ms 39/3910 (1%)
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 30.1 MBytes 253 Mbits/sec 0.048 ms 51/3903 (1.3%)
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 30.2 MBytes 254 Mbits/sec 0.058 ms 40/3911 (1%)
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 30.2 MBytes 253 Mbits/sec 0.058 ms 50/3912 (1.3%)
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 30.3 MBytes 255 Mbits/sec 0.056 ms 25/3906 (0.64%)
[ 5] 10.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.056 ms 0/0 (0%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Jitter Lost/Total Datagrams
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0.056 ms 465/38741 (1.2%)
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Thu Jul 04, 2019 6:20 pm

Hello,

Now I just made a 20GB transfer of files between the two Macs via SMB protocol (Microsoft) and the performance was 56MB/s.

Half the theoretical bandwidth of the link.

Best regards,
 
dirks
just joined
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2019 9:54 am

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Thu Jul 04, 2019 9:56 pm

I have nearly the same issue as you with the Wireless Wire Kit. It's a 88m link and UDP Iperf3 shows ~950 mbit/s TCP is about ~350 mbit/s to any device on the remote side. Honestly i expected to get also via TCP around 1 gbit/s, but it might be not true.

Signal is 90 and MCS 8. Bandwithtest between the devices is showing the full possible speed.

Regards
Dirk
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Thu Jul 04, 2019 11:20 pm

Dirk

Can you make a brief summary of your network connections to see if we can help each other?

Is your model the Wireless Dish LHG60?

Regards

Thomas
 
dirks
just joined
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2019 9:54 am

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Fri Jul 05, 2019 12:08 am

Hi Thomas,

no not the dish. RBwAPG-60ad devices, the small ones.

AP:
/interface w60g> monitor 0
connected: yes
frequency: 58320
remote-address: 04:D6:AA:A9:AD:60
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 90
rssi: -55
tx-sector: 27
tx-sector-info: center
distance: 88.7m
tx-packet-error-rate: 0%


Station:
/interface w60g> monitor 0
connected: yes
frequency: 58320
remote-address: 04:D6:AA:A8:0E:6B
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 90
rssi: -56
tx-sector: 34
tx-sector-info: right 11.4 degrees, up 3.8 degrees
distance: 88.71m
tx-packet-error-rate: 0%
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Fri Jul 05, 2019 11:03 am

Hi Dirk,

The only thing I see here is that the tx-sector-info of the Station has a bit / a lot of misalignment.

Another thing, AP and Station are in the same network segment (Class C)?

Do you have different networks on each side of the link (as is my case) or is it a single network?

Best regards,

Thomas
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Fri Jul 05, 2019 12:50 pm

Hi,

Upgraded to 6.46beta6

192.168.88.2
[admin@MikroTik] > interface w60g monitor 0
connected: yes
frequency: 58320
remote-address: 6C:C7:EC:9E:D2:C6
tx-mcs: 3
tx-phy-rate: 962.0Mbps
signal: 40
rssi: -48
tx-sector: 4
tx-sector-info: right 0.2 degrees, down 1.4 degrees
distance: 71.73m
tx-packet-error-rate: 7%
-- [Q quit|D dump|C-z pause]

192.168.88.3
[admin@MikroTik] > interface w60g monitor 0
connected: yes
frequency: 58320
remote-address: 6C:C7:EC:9E:D2:BD
tx-mcs: 8
tx-phy-rate: 2.3Gbps
signal: 80
rssi: -48
tx-sector: 54
tx-sector-info: right 1 degrees, up 1 degrees
distance: 71.8m
tx-packet-error-rate: 7%
-- [Q quit|D dump|C-z pause]

Since this morning the 88.2 has low signal and mcs.

I have changed from 58GHz to 62.640MHz and the signal has improved.

In any of the two frequencies and with different levels of signal and MCS, the transfer tests using SMB protocol continue to give 48MB/s

Regards,
 
jellex
just joined
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2019 10:32 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Mon Jul 15, 2019 9:42 pm

How is your LOS?

I tested the dishes with 200 meters on the street, good LOS. Point was I only used 1 meter high poles and couldnt get the throughput right. The links even went down sometimes. So, I just didnt account for the fresnel enough (the street was too close obviously). I placed the same dishes on rooftops now with good fresnel and they are running perfectly for months now. There is 500 meters in between and signal/MCS etc just doesn't change with any rain (haven't had snow yet). Using 58GHZ freq.

These dishes are used for a 200MBit uplink to a student house with 250 students. There has been continuous use on the link for many months now. No problems at all.
PS: I also used the link for a three day hackathon (simultanuous with students) with 800 people/1200 devices and had no problems with the link. At peak times (800+MBit/sec) the error rate would rise to max 4%.

About the short distance; I had the test-link running for two days at 7 meters. I did a TCP duplex throughput-test for two days continuously with an iperf3 thread with 120 streams. I did not loose 1 packet while also pinging the other side. Average throughput, after two days, on servers on both ends was 930MBit/sec, the max they could achieve.

So again, how is your fresnel and LOS with the dishes?
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Mon Jul 15, 2019 11:26 pm

Hello,

I understand by LOS Line of Sight. It is perfect, without any obstacle.

With regard to the fresnel issue (I understand fresnel zone) here, there could be problems because I did not know this effect until you mentioned it.

The antennas are located 1.5 meters above the floor of the respective roofs attached to a side wall by a metal "U" support that leaves them about 15 centimeters from the wall and 1.5 meters above the floor. Tomorrow I will post pictures of the two antennas here.

On the other hand, during these days setting in the bridge interface

IGMP Snooping ON
DHCP Snooping ON
Add DHCP Option 82 ON
Fast Forward ON

and in bridge port 0 (Ethernet)

Unknown Unicast Flood ON
Unknown Multicast Flood ON
Broadcast Flood ON
Trusted Blank
Hardware Offload ON

It seems that the speed has almost doubled.

Today, for example, from a NAS on one end to a MacBookPro on the other I have transferred 300GB with SMB protocol with a performance of 83MB / s (61minutes) when before these changes the maximum obtained was 48MB / s.

I thank you very much for your interest in helping me. Tomorrow I will post detailed pictures of the installation of antennas.

Regards,
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Wed Jul 17, 2019 10:01 pm

Hello,

Photographs of the installation of the "bridge" equipment and direct line of sight to the antenna of the "station bridge". In the photo there is a red arrow indicating where is the "station bridge" antenna.

20190717_201236.jpg
Sorry, You have to turn the photo towards the right
20190717_201329 copia.jpg
20190717_201338 copia.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Wed Jul 17, 2019 10:04 pm

Hello,

Photographs of the installation of the "station-bridge" equipment and direct line of sight to the antenna of the "bridge". In the photo there is a red arrow indicating where is the "
bridge" antenna.
20190716_154208.jpg
20190716_154252.jpg
20190716_154340 copia.jpg

Do you think they are well installed?

Best regards,
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
 
jellex
just joined
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2019 10:32 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Wed Jul 17, 2019 11:20 pm

Thanks for the clear photos. Since your AP is aiming away from the wall and the STA (station) is aiming up, there shouldn't be a problem with the fresnel zone in this setup IMO. (since the fresnel for 60ghz is really narrow, especially for this distance)

But, I can't help but seeing that at least the STA is not perfectly vertical. Please check with a 'bubble level' if both dishes are perfectly vertical/horizontal mounted.
Please help the community by reporting back your findings. Thanks!
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Wed Jul 17, 2019 11:45 pm

Goodnight,

The dishes are at different heights. The bridge is approximately 5m higher on the horizontal than the station-bridge.

I made the alignment with the small pointing accessory provided by Microtik. The data that I posted a few messages back obtained with "monitor" indicated:

bridge
tx-sector-info: right 0.2 degrees, down 1.4 degrees
distance: 71.73m

station-bridge
tx-sector-info: right 1 degrees, up 1 degrees
distance: 71.8m

For what I believe should not be misaligned. But hey, I'm new to this type of antenna and this frequency and maybe I'm wrong.

The tests that I continued to carry out today through SMB protocol transmission between a NAS and a MacBookPro have yielded 74.91MB/s and 74.33MB/s for transfers of 386.27GB and 418.11GB.

Now I will have to be close to a week without doing tests for office infrastructure issues, but next Tuesday or there I will return to the load. What I would like to investigate is whether the unicast, multicast, broadcast and blocking packages have something to do with the increase in performance and also how the link with iperf TCP behaves in both directions simultaneously.

Jellex, thank you very much and we keep in touch. If you need any more information or suggest or suggest an experiment, do not hesitate to ask for it.

Best regards,
 
jellex
just joined
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2019 10:32 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Thu Jul 18, 2019 1:13 am

The monitor command only shows you 2 out 4 possible angles, the aiming angles; left-right and up-down. These can be adjusted with the mounting brackets.

While mounting you should also account for the pole being perfectly vertical and thus the antenna itself should be vertical. Else your polarization will be off. This cannot be adjusted with the mounting brackets and you should adjust the pole itself or tweak the antenna mount a bit so that the antenna is vertical.
Your STA doesn't seem to be vertical, looking at the two upper bars of the antenna, you see?

(I'm also quite new with these antennas so I'm looking for others who are testing them out, thanks for sharing!
In two weeks I'll be mounting another pair over 330 meters. I'll post an update on those)
 
TPF1963
newbie
Topic Author
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 4:56 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Thu Jul 18, 2019 11:13 am

Hello,

Okay. I have already understood the vertical / horizontal polarization. I'll check in a couple of days and I'll tell you how they are.

Best regards,
 
jellex
just joined
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2019 10:32 pm

Re: Performance Microtik Wireless Dish

Wed Oct 02, 2019 3:35 pm

Did you fix your problem?
I have fixed unstable connections with the LHG60ad by using other frequencies.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests