Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
R1CH
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1101
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 11:44 pm

WDS without the W

Sat Apr 14, 2007 6:33 am

Hi all,
I'm hoping to install some APs to cover a large complex with wireless. Users will be using laptops and so will be roaming from one AP to another quite often. However, I do not want to use WDS as there is already Cat5 running through the buildings and I can simply have each AP connected directly, minimizing any performance losses associated with going through many WDS links.

However, would seamless roaming still work in this scenario? It's a requirement that the clients are able to walk around and roam from one AP to another without losing connectivity.
 
gtrappmann
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:42 am
Location: germany
Contact:

Sat Apr 14, 2007 8:21 am

hi....

shure you can....you only have to prevent overlapping channels...


regards

gerd
 
R1CH
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Topic Author
Posts: 1101
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 11:44 pm

Sat Apr 14, 2007 8:27 am

So if everything is configured with the same ssid, roaming is automatic? If the APs are on different channels, I don't see how a client can seamlessly roam without having to change frequencies to check for a new AP...
 
0ldman
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1465
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 5:01 am

Sat Apr 14, 2007 3:41 pm

Roaming is more a function of the client than the AP.
The difference in frequency isn't going to be as much of an issue as DHCP client.

When set to static IP, I can swap between AP's without ever missing a beat playing an MP3 over a network share. When set to DHCP, it drops connection for at least 1 second releasing and renewing the IP.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests