Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
shielder
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 221
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 7:09 pm
Location: Indonesia

Need help with Stand-alone outdoor AP configuration

Thu Sep 15, 2005 5:33 am

Hi, recently i purchased RB500 + atheros card and i wish to use that on the following scenario :

RouterOS --> Rb500+Atheroes --> Client


As i have already have a RouterOS with 1.8 Ghz as the basic router, i wish my RB500 to ack as a outdoor Wireless AP only, without any routing needed for it. I wish my RB500 to have just 1 ip (just as the other outdoor AP). How can i configure that? Do i need to bridge between the ether1 and wireless interface? Please help me. Thank you very much
 
sten
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 919
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 12:10 pm

Thu Sep 15, 2005 4:10 pm

Have you tried bridging ether and wlan?
 
shielder
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 221
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 7:09 pm
Location: Indonesia

Thu Sep 15, 2005 5:08 pm

No, i haven't tried bridged the unit yet, because i am not really expert in that. If you could please give me detail instruction on how to setup it. Thank you very much
 
Gradius
just joined
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

Thu Sep 15, 2005 5:16 pm

It is my experience that when you bridge the 2 interfaces, you will lose a considerable amount of throughput. We are still testing this though.
 
User avatar
stephenpatrick
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 702
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 12:26 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Thu Sep 15, 2005 5:27 pm

Bridge the ethernet and wireless interfaces.
Works great on the AP for non-MT clients.

(you can't do this on a station without WDS though)

Regards
 
Gradius
just joined
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

Thu Sep 15, 2005 5:30 pm

We've tested going from MT to MT on our backbone and at every hop we've been losing 1Mb-1.5Mb throught the bridged interfaces. But like I said, we are still testing.
 
User avatar
stephenpatrick
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 702
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 12:26 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Thu Sep 15, 2005 5:33 pm

The wireless interface always shows more "traffic" than the ethernet interface where the real traffic level to measure is.

I always quote them on the ethernet interface OUT of the router - the input side where the bandwidth tester source is always reads too high also.

Regards
 
carus
just joined
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 11:49 pm

Thu Sep 15, 2005 6:06 pm

This is exactly what I'm trying to do.

I already have an MT Router, works great, I've been using a CB3 as an AP and want to replace it. So I have an MT 532 now - straight out of the box, nothings really configed. I have an Atheros mini-PCI. I setup the AP under WIRELESS -> INTERFACES - I've added IP's to the Ether1 and WLAN1 interfaces, which devices on my network can ping, I can see the SSID with my laptop and connect and the WIRELESS TABLES -> REGISTRATION shows my laptop connecting. But I can't ping anything from or to my laptop. :(

Wirelessly everything looks like it's connecting, but network wise it doesn't seem to work. Do I need to add some firewall rules or bridge some interface?

All I want is for this MT device to act like an AP - no special routing (unless I have to) or anything.

Thanks all

-Carus
 
User avatar
stephenpatrick
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 702
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 12:26 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

  [SOLVED]

Thu Sep 15, 2005 6:59 pm

Setup a bridge (say "bridge1")

make sure Ethernet and WLAN are members of the bridge

Bingo.
 
carus
just joined
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 11:49 pm

Thu Sep 15, 2005 7:17 pm

I love you ...... in a purely platonic soft of way . :roll:

I was thinking that even without a bridge I shoud be able to ping the WLAN1 interface, but oh well - yeah it works.

Now on to the more difficult stuff. :)

-Carus

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 24 guests