Yes. Maybe we have to accept some latency in the 40-60 range@chadd
I will try the settings 8 to 10 the next days on two APs 12 clients and 35 clients.
then reporting here the results here.
with 2 or 4 as tdma-period-size I got stable latency from AP to clients about 20-30ms.
with 8 it increases latency to 40ms but stable
Any profund knowledge to NV2 welcome!
AP 4.16 Clients 5.0rc7 and 4.16
TDMA period size 4 / 6 / 8 marginal better throughput higher latancy - but really not good comparing nstreme
after upgrading the AP to 4.16 swichting back nstreme = clients keep not connected some fluctuating randomly.
with nv2 it is stable.
This is old post now I think 80-90% of nv2 problems are fixed, have more than 30 links + 8 PTMP sector with more than 30 clients on each after MT v5.9 I can say nv2 is faster than nstreemthere are news about NV2?
I'm going to activate a new PTMP sector for business clients.
i would use the best mk solution. I thought NV2 + 802.11n.
what is the best solution at the moment?NV2 +802.11n, NV2 + 802.11g, nstreme+802.11n, or nstreme + 802.11g ?
Thanks and Merry Christmas
hi sonnyNobody uses NV2 in PTMP?
This is a real world traffic AP 12900 connections 12 APS connedted to sector
after switching form NV2 to nstreme (sunday 21.00h)