2.jpgROS delay than the UBNT gap is too big
it is because of different parameters that cmd uses for ping and what mikrotik does.
I often wonder is the higher ping times on NV2 due to all the stuff the Mikrotik has on each device even after removing unneeded packages, could it be a processor issue and is there lower ping times with a faster processor?Nv2 ping times are higher, try using nstreme instead. But yeah, it's sad ubnt outperforms MT with TDMA
I find NV2 very good it will be better when latency is reduced and is far for useless.I would prefer to test the functionality. NV2 is useless in most cases. UBNT beat MK, both in response and in functionality.