ROS delay than the UBNT gap is too big

it is because of different parameters that cmd uses for ping and what mikrotik does.

it is because of different parameters that cmd uses for ping and what mikrotik does.

----------------------
I want to say

use nv2 of mikrotik is get high delay

and use ubnt it'is not this ping delay

Nv2 ping times are higher, try using nstreme instead. But yeah, it's sad ubnt outperforms MT with TDMA

Nv2 ping times are higher, try using nstreme instead. But yeah, it's sad ubnt outperforms MT with TDMA

I often wonder is the higher ping times on NV2 due to all the stuff the Mikrotik has on each device even after removing unneeded packages, could it be a processor issue and is there lower ping times with a faster processor?

Nv2 ping times are higher, try using nstreme instead. But yeah, it's sad ubnt outperforms MT with TDMA

no tdma for ubnt in that picture

tdma UBI

Nv2 ping times are higher, try using nstreme instead. But yeah, it's sad ubnt outperforms MT with TDMA

no tdma for ubnt in that picture

Agreed.

It isn't a valid comparison to use TDMA on one and not the other.

tdma UBI

airmax is disabled, so no tdma

I would prefer to test the functionality. NV2 is useless in most cases. UBNT beat MK, both in response and in functionality.

Yeah. And that is sad. It seems that they need so little to make their already great product just perfect..

I would prefer to test the functionality. NV2 is useless in most cases. UBNT beat MK, both in response and in functionality.

I find NV2 very good it will be better when latency is reduced and is far for useless.