Community discussions

MikroTik App
  4. RouterOS
  5. Wireless Networking

RouterBOARD 112 Wireless Performance test

Locked
 
uldis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Topic Author
Posts: 3446
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 2:55 pm

RouterBOARD 112 Wireless Performance test

Mon Mar 27, 2006 12:03 pm

The test results using bandwidth test in Mbps can be found here: http://www.mikrotik.com/download/rb112test.pdf
Top
 
aviper
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 196
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 5:48 pm

Tue Mar 28, 2006 3:40 pm

Could you post the link to the old 532 test? I can't find it.
Top
 
jober
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 690
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 12:16 pm
Location: Louisiana,USA

Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:45 am

Yes, Please do!

It would be nice if the same test was done on a 533Mhz VIA, 1.2Ghz PentiumM and a 3Ghz P4.
I'm about to build a ptp link with a CeleronM 1.5Ghz CPU and I sure hope I'm not pissing away the money on this if it doesn't go any faster.
Top
 
aviper
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 196
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 5:48 pm

Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:35 am

I wanted to say that there where 532a tests around, but I lost the link.

P.S. Can you share the confs, soo if we make tests they will be comparealbe.

P.P.S. I found it: http://www.mikrotik.com/Documentation/wireless_test.pdf , but the test is with 2.9rc7 :).
Top
 
dsovereen
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 7:54 pm
Location: Michigan, USA
Contact:
Contact dsovereen

Sun May 07, 2006 11:26 pm

Does anyone know why the performance is better with Framing Policy equal to None vs Framing Policy set to Dynamic Size = 3200 bytes? What is the recommended Nstreme configuration for PtP applications? And for PtMP?

Dave
Top
 
User avatar
stephenpatrick
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 702
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 12:26 pm
Location: UK
Contact:
Contact stephenpatrick

Mon May 08, 2006 2:02 am

Probably because it's CPU limited. One setting uses more CPU cycle than the other.

Would be nice to hear from other users which the "preferred" nstreme framer setting is -

Regards
Top
 
User avatar
macgaiver
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1764
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 5:57 pm
Location: Sol III, Sol system, Sector 001, Alpha Quadrant

Tue Jun 20, 2006 11:50 am

It depends on many things, on average packet size, packets per second number, e.t.c.

You must try each policy and then, and only then you will be able to make a decision.
Top
 
maxfava
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 225
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 12:30 am

Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:55 am

I have tested bandwith with FTP download from a local server with two CM9 cards installed on RB112.
The total bandwith of the single card is 18 Mbit.
But if I download at the same time from two clients connected one to first CM9 and one to the second CM9 the total bandwith is about 20 Mbit instead of 36 Mbi.
Last edited by maxfava on Mon Oct 23, 2006 1:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
 
User avatar
chvdr
Member
Member
Posts: 403
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 8:53 pm

did you ever make any tests with sr9

Fri Oct 06, 2006 1:20 pm

did you ever make any tests with sr9 and RB 112
Top
 
maxfava
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 225
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 12:30 am

Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:56 am

No only 2.4G e 5Ghz with CM9 and Senao ETSI
Top
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests
  4. RouterOS
  5. Wireless Networking