Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
believewireless
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 231
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 6:30 pm

High CPU Utilization on RB532

Sat Apr 15, 2006 8:03 pm

We have two SR5s in a RB532. One is providing backhaul and the other is connecting 7 wireless clients. Both SR5s are acting as APs using WDS. We are seeing about 70-85% CPU load even when nearly no traffic is going across the link! This RB532 is running 2.9.20 w/330MHz CPU frequency set.

The other end of the backhaul is a RB512 running at 330MHz and shows 30-40% CPU load. This is running NStreme on all routerboards.

The bridge interface on the RB532 is showing less than 10Kbps of traffic and less than 10p/s!

Why is the CPU utilization so high?

The link is still able to pass >20Mbps of traffic and we plan on moving the backhaul to a dedicated routerboard in the near future but we want to make sure everything is working well.
 
Alex
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 214
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 11:07 am

Mon Apr 17, 2006 10:08 am

turn off nstreme.for nstreme you need at least 800 Mhz x86 CPU
 
User avatar
NetTraptor
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 76
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 4:12 pm
Location: Athens Greece
Contact:

Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:56 am

turn off nstreme.for nstreme you need at least 800 Mhz x86 CPU
I can not confirm that ... I have a P3 600 running 2 nstream 802.11a and 1 normal 802.11a just fine. No peaks at 100% CPU utilization with full blast traffic.

What i have noticed is that if you turn on nstream, depending on CPU you use, you constantly have a proportional % overhead on CPU utilization no matter what. On the other hand when you traffic test or you have the link going at full blast you will only see a bit of extra utilization (% again proportional to the CPU used).

What i can agree to is that RBs are not that fast but they perform well with 2 802.11a max 3 links (always thinking that you will never need the full blast of 802.11a) or a nstream for backbone and one or maybe more b AP interfaces. Always have in mind that some b cards utilize more the processor than others.

MT we need power on RBs. It whould be nice to have something around 1GHz, with a daughter board for more IFs. :D Nice powerfull and compact... :wink:

I would like to hear some comments from others… share your experiences :)
 
User avatar
Alessio Garavano
Member
Member
Posts: 306
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 12:49 am
Location: Corrientes, Argentina
Contact:

Tue Apr 18, 2006 7:27 am

Yeah, may be good a RB with a power mobile CPU like a Centrino, Sempron or a new Viiv ;)
 
ericsooter
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 285
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Oklahoma USA

Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:13 am

I use Nstreme on Routerboard 532's. It works pretty good as long as you are not wanting to push more than 17-20 mbit. Anyway, as for high CPU usage; if nstreme is for a point-to-point link then turn polling off and set framer-policy to best-fit. It will significantly reduce your CPU usage.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure you only need polling if you are running point-to-multipoint.

Eric
Last edited by ericsooter on Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
 
User avatar
Alessio Garavano
Member
Member
Posts: 306
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 12:49 am
Location: Corrientes, Argentina
Contact:

Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:18 am

Check here... at the little new RB100 can work with nstreme, a 800Mhz CPU is required if you need traffic about 80Mbps ;)

http://forum.mikrotik.com//viewtopic.php?t=7582

Regards!
Alessio

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests