Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
kazanova
Member
Member
Topic Author
Posts: 406
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 11:52 am

128+128=256???

Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:52 pm

could be have 128+128=256
pcc no any other can??? bonde???
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8709
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: 128+128=256???

Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:57 pm

yesss, bonding in RR mode =) but only on low-latency links, and only if you control both sides of the link
 
kazanova
Member
Member
Topic Author
Posts: 406
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 11:52 am

Re: 128+128=256???

Tue Jun 22, 2010 9:00 pm

peleas explaen more about low-latency and control both sides

so the bonding better than pcc ????!!!
 
User avatar
Chupaka
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 8709
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:15 pm
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Contact:

Re: 128+128=256???

Tue Jun 22, 2010 9:04 pm

if those links are between your routers - you may bond them. if you use RR mode on high-latency links, packet reordering may occur. it's bad =)

PCC and bonding are for different goals. bonding has nothing to do with load balancing

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests