original poster says hAP ac3 can't be replaced by hAP ax3 because it lacks SFP port. But hAP ac3 did not have SFP port
Is this ChatGPT post?
Hello,
I don't know if comparing me to Chat GPT is a compliment or not, but the post was written by a human (and a bit of translator...).
And now I would like to write how I meant it:
- I bought hAPac3 years ago because it suited me.
- now that fiber and faster speeds are common, I would need (as your videos also suggest) to upgrade. That's why I'm looking for a replacement for the original router, but no mikrotik offers a higher level of the original router with SFP.
I think it's not enough to just upgrade the 802.11ac radio to ax (and a usb 3.0 port, 2.5Gbps port). As a replacement for the hAPac3, I would prefer the L009UiGS-2HaxD-IN, even though it only has a 2.4GHz radio. Well, however, I looked at the performance (Ethernet test result on Mtik page) and I was disappointed, it does not reach the performance of hAPax3 (what I would expect). I understand that the L009 is a successor to another product, the RB2011 (but there was also no hAPac3 at the time, as far as I know).
The L009 was supposed to have an IPQ-6010 processor and 1GB of RAM, which would make it the right replacement for the hAPac3, but at the same time it would attack the position of the RB5009UG. (anyway, in my mind I think that's how the techs designed it. $20 extra wouldn't hurt.)
It is not enough to just upgrade the products (innovate the already created feature packages), I think and recommend redesigning the feature packages.
PS: I don't even like the visual design of the box for the hAPxx3 product. I just wanted to draw attention to the different meanings of the word design - proposal and design - visual.
Otherwise, great work, I just didn't want to criticize.