I try to avoid those when possible for obvious reasons.How do you handle DFS events, @holvoetn? Or don't you use any DFS channels?
Not buying that as the two laptops are fairly new and none of the devices have the issue on my Hap AX3.It's not a bug if your AP uses a frequency which the client devices can not use. That's a client device problem.
E.g. for a client installation I have Symbol warehouse scanners only able to use 5Ghz 5180-5240. Nothing else.
So I needed to set all 15 APs to use those frequencies (in a non-overlapping pattern) only and nothing else.
I NEVER use auto frequency not even at home.
I ALWAYS set frequencies manually for each AP after doing a scan of the environment. It rarely requires a change for the devices under my control.
Original setup is full auto configuration for both 2G and 5G WiFi, Skip DFS Channels set to 10min CAC. All other setting are left to whatever Mikrotik has assigned.How do you handle DFS events, @holvoetn? Or don't you use any DFS channels?
/interface/wifi/actual-configuration/print
/interface/wifi/print detail
And you can tell with 100% certainty both AX2 and AX3 were using the same frequency ? I doubt it.Not buying that as the two laptops are fairly new and none of the devices have the issue on my Hap AX3.
This is happening on Linux Mint 21.3 5.15.0-107-generic x86_64 bits as well as Win 11 with latest updates.Can you report the output of the following commands?
(possibly by disabling WPA3, first)Code: Select all/interface/wifi/actual-configuration/print /interface/wifi/print detail
What linux distribution do you have?
Maybe you missed the fact that the system was working fine before changing the config to switch/AP mode. Yes the same laptops worked fine before that even though the Wifi for 5GHz was setup in exactly the same way after the reconfig.And you can tell with 100% certainty both AX2 and AX3 were using the same frequency ? I doubt it.Not buying that as the two laptops are fairly new and none of the devices have the issue on my Hap AX3.
Unless you set the frequency yourself, you don't know what will be used.
I have seen devices not 1 or 2 year old unable to connect to higher wifi bands whereas my 4 year old Samsung S20 has no problems doing so.
You probably missed my first part. Could you please provide that report?This is happening on Linux Mint 21.3 5.15.0-107-generic x86_64 bits as well as Win 11 with latest updates.Can you report the output of the following commands?
(possibly by disabling WPA3, first)Code: Select all/interface/wifi/actual-configuration/print /interface/wifi/print detail
What linux distribution do you have?
iw list
Information requested is in attachment.Also the output of the command
on one of the laptops is useful. Mint should have it.Code: Select alliw list
That was my post and my problem was with a Lenovo laptop too. Probably both using the Realtek chipset. I think on these chipsets, it's a failure to implement 802.11d correctly. They don't set the country correctly and block connecting to 5745 and above. On a Windows laptop, you can try disabling 802.11d in the device manager, if the option is available.Lenovo Intel Evo Thinkpad 1 year old
Lenovo Intel Evo Slim7 3 years old
Both are running the Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 hardware, and worked fine before changing the Hap's function from router to switch/AP mode.That was my post and my problem was with a Lenovo laptop too. Probably both using the Realtek chipset. I think on these chipsets, it's a failure to implement 802.11d correctly. They don't set the country correctly and block connecting to 5745 and above. On a Windows laptop, you can try disabling 802.11d in the device manager, if the option is available.Lenovo Intel Evo Thinkpad 1 year old
Lenovo Intel Evo Slim7 3 years old
Yes, indeed. I don't believe that switching from router to switch/AP is the reason.There should be no logical reason why it's different between being configured as a router and a switch/access point. The main difference being lack of firewall and NAT on the later. But that shouldn't really affect Wi-Fi.
Q.E.D.I've read the output of the commands and there is a chance that the AX2 chose a frequency >= 5845 (channel >= 169) which is permitted in the US (at least according to ROS) but disabled on the laptop (according to iw list).
This also explains why the issue disappeared when the frequencies were explicitly set.
Choosing those frequencies appears to be reasonable, since they allow high transmission power and no DFS. I don't think we have elements for suspecting a bug (not yet, at least).