im looking at the hexgr3, hapac2, rb4011 and rb5009
will be doing mostly simple queues on clients
1 client = 1 parent simple queue and 2-3 sub queues
wifi will be disabled purely routing
64 byte (Routing 25 simple queues)
device | kpps | mbps
hexgr3 | 171 | 87
hapac2 | 506 | 256
rb4011 | 960 | 491
rb5009 | 1001 | 544
based on the performance above
hapac2 is 3x more cpu than hexgr3. correct?
rb4001 is 2x more cpu power than hexgr3. correct?
rb5009 has a very slight performance increase vs the rb4001. correct?
local prices i can add around ~10usd to the hexgr3 price to get the hapac2
the cost of 3 hapac2 can buy only 1 rb4011
and around the cost of 4 hapac2 for 1 rb5009
So the hapac2 looks to be the best bang for the buck. Correct?